IR 05000269/1979024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-269/79-24,50-270/79-22 & 50-287/79-24 on 790821-24 & 0905-07.Major Areas Inspected:Security Organization & Physical Barriers.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML19211A901
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/27/1979
From: Howell J, John W, Moore D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:
Shared Package
ML19211A887 List:
References
50-269-79-24, 50-270-79-22, 50-287-79-24, NUDOCS 7912210283
Download: ML19211A901 (1)


Text

Ff,T7.'?.t T"3"U"TT 3 !Tl!!TH

- *

d

+pa "'ag C;;;il."; 2J. 2. :.% ~;l UNITED STATES l'

c*t, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$g)

E REGION 11

.

'#

oK 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 303o3

SEP 271979 Report Nos. 50-269/79-24, 50-270/79-22 and 50-287/79-24 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 rf q s

License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 7 g.

_[

Ccpics

_

.,

Licensee: Duke Power Company

'" '. ;h re---

422 South Church Street r

ific p'._ _ l..

_I Charlotte, North Catolina 20247

"'~'

-- -

Facility Name: Oconee 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at: Oconee site near Seneca, South Carolina Inspection conducted: August 21-24 and September 5-7, 1979 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit: April 9-13, 1979 Type of Ins est ion-Unannounced Physical Security Inspe ors'

h

7 4.' '

' ore, ec y'InspectM D6te Aigned

~

P/24/79 j. C. Irosell,'$ecurity Inspector Date Signed f

Accompanied by:

N. E. Ervin, DSI, IE:HQ Approved by:_

.(

7 e7 ? 94.

..

W. J. Tobin, A ting Chief, S&I Section, DAte Sfgned Safeguards ranch Inspection Summary Areas Inspected:

Included review of security organization, physical barriers, response, locks / keys, testing / maintenance, records / reports and licensee action on previous inspection findings.

The inspection involved 67 inspector hours on site by three NRC inspectors. The inspection was begun during an offshift period; 10 inspection hours were accomplished during offshift periods.

Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the seven areas examined during the inspection except for the following two items:

1.

Physical barrier - Air conditioning duct work provided access into a vital area from the protected area (Infraction 79-24-01).

2.

Records and reports - Individuals working in vital area failed to record required information in vital area log (Deficiency 79-24-02).

,

,

,

!vs.

.,

EATERI?.tTard'S!'.:iT:3 IEGIITH Jggy

]f)

CONTAliiS 2Z31;;CIM D

g