IR 05000261/1992020
| ML14174B014 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1992 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Watson R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9211100047 | |
| Download: ML14174B014 (32) | |
Text
OCT 3 0992 FILE COPY Docket No.: 50-261 License No.: DPR-23 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. R. A. Watson Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REPORT NO. 50-261/92-20 This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
Report for your Robinson facility which was sent to you on September 8, 1992; our meeting of September 24, 1992, at which we discussed the report; and your written response dated October 28, 1992. Enclosed is our summary of the September 24, 1992 meeting and a copy of the slides used during this meetin Also enclosed is a revision to the Initial SALP Report and constitutes the Final SALP Repor We have reviewed your written response and find that no changes to the Initial SALP Report are needed. No reply to this letter is necessary; however, should you have any further questions concerning this matter, I will be pleased to discuss them with yo
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Stewart D. Ebneter Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator
Enclosures:
1. Meeting Summary SALP Slides 3. CP&L Letter dated October 28, 1992 4. Revision Sheet
REGION II==
ORGANIZATION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR S. EBNETER DEPUTY L.REYES I
_
__I DIVISION OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS REACTOR SAFETY RADIATION SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS DIR. E. MERSCHOFF DI A. GIBSON DI J. STOHR DEPUTY J. JOHNSON DEPUTY (VACANT)
DEPUTY B. MALLETT
DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS ORGANIZATION DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS DIR. E. MERSCHOFF DEPUTY J. JOHNSON REACTOR PROJECTS BRANCH NO. 1 CHIEF D. VERRELLI PROJECTS SECTION PROJECTS SECTION NO. 1A NO. 1B CHIEF CHIEF H. CHRISTENSEN F. CANTRELL BRUNSWICK HARRIS ROBINSON-SRI L. GARNER GRAND GULF SUMMER
NRR ORGANIZATION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION DIR. T. MURLEY ASSOC. DIRECTOR FOR ASSOC. DIRECTOR FOR PROJECTS INSPECTION AND J. PARTLOW TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS 1/11 DIVISION OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS S. VARGA, DIR. 1/Il ASSESSMENT G. LAINAS, ASST. DIR. II E. ADENSAM, DIR. Il-i rDIVISION OF E S REACTOR INSPECTION AND SAFEGUARDS B. L. MOZAFARI, PROJ MGR, ROBINSON I
DIVISION OF RADIATION PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DIVISION OF DIVISION OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE AND REACTOR PROJECTS III/IV/V QUALITY EVALUATION AND SPECIAL PROJECTS SYTES OL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
w3ERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS FOR OPERATING REACTORS A. PLANT OPERATIONS B. RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS C. MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE D. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS E. SECURITY F. ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT G. SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION
AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 1 LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED IN A SUPERIOR LEVEL OF PERFORMANC NRC WILL CONSIDER REDUCED LEVELS OF INSPECTION EFFOR AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 2 LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED IN A GOOD LEVEL OF PERFORMANC NRC WILL CONSIDER MAINTAINING NORMAL LEVELS OF INSPECTION EFFOR AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 3 LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED IN AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE; HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE NRC'S CONCERN THAT A DECREASE IN PERFORMANCE MAY APPROACH OR REACH AN UNACCEPTABLE LEVEL, NRC WILL CONSIDER INCREASED LEVELS OF INSPECTION EFFOR EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AND CONTROL IN ASSURING QUALITY 2. APPROACH TO IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT 3. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY 4. REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION OF REPORTABLE EVENTS 5. STAFFING (INCLUDING MANAGEMENT)
6. TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALIFICATION
ROBINSON MARCH 31, 1991 - JUNE 27, 1992 (CYCLE 10)
COMP FAILURE 20%
OPERATING 3 OTHER
.
10%
PERSONNEL IA 40%
TEST/CALIB 5 DESIGN/
CONST %
PERSONNEL TOTAL (8)
(20)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LERs)
OPERATIONS (CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF OPERATIONS IMPROVED TO EXCELLENT STRENGTHS
- PLANT PERFORMANCE
- OPERATOR PERFORMANCE
- CONTROL OF OUTAGE ACTIVITIES
- MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
- FIRE PROTECTION CHALLENGE
- ROUTINE OPERATIONS
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS REMAINED EXCELLENT STRENGTHS
- PEOPLE
-
MANAGEMENT AND STAFF
- ALARA
- PERFORMANCE
-
CONTAMINATED AREA
-
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
-
PERSONNEL EXPOSURE
-
RADWASTE MANAGEMENT
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CATEGORY 1)
(CONT'D)
CHALLENGES
- AUDITS AND ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION
- CONTRACT TECHNICIAN TRAINING
MAINTENANCE/
SURVEILLANCE (CATEGORY 2)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF MAINTENANCE/
SURVEILLANCE REMAINED GOOD STRENGTHS
- PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
- MATERIAL CONDITION
- MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT CHALLENG ES
- EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE
- STAFFING
- CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CATEGORY 2 IMPROVING)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REMAINED GOOD WITH AN IMPROVING TREND NOTED STR ENGTHS
- MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
- PERSONNEL
- PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
- CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPROVEMENTS
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CATEGORY 2 IMPROVING)
(CONT'D)
CHALLENGES
- EXERCISE PERFORMANCE-NOTIFICATIONS-DAMAGE CONTROL TEAM MANAGEMENT-DOSE ASSESSMENT/
PROJECTION-PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS
SECURITY (CATEGORY 1, DECLINING)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF SECURITY REMAINED EXCELLENT, WITH A DECLINING TREND NOTED STRENGTHS
- MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
- PROGRAMS
- PERFORMANCE CHALLENGE
- CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
ENGINEERING/
TECHNICAL SUPPORT (CATEGORY 2)
PERFORMANCE REMAINED GOOD IN THE ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT AREA STRENGTHS
- SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
- PERFORMANCE
- TRAINING CHALLENGES
- DESIGN ERRORS
- PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT
- EROSION/CORROSION PROGRAM
SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION (CATEGORY 2)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA OF SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION REMAINED GOOD STRENGTHS
- MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
- SAFETY INITIATIVES
- ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM-INSPECTION GUIDE FOR STRUCTURES-DBD-IPE
- LICENSING ACTIVITIES
SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION (CATEGORY 2)
(CONT'D)
CHALLENGES
- NAD EFFECTIVENESS
- CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
SALP RATING SUMMARY SALP CYCLES 9 AND 10 FUNCTIONAL RATING RATING AREA LAST PERIOD THIS PERIOD OPERATIONS
1 RAD CONTROL
1 MAINT/SURV
2 EMER PREP
2 (IMPROVING)
SECURITY
1 (DECLINING)
ENGR/TECH
2 SA/QV
2
ENCLOSURE 3 CP&L Carolina Power & Light Company ROiMlNSO NUCLEAR PROJECT DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 790
.iA.k'T iLLE, iOUTH CAROLINA 29550 Robinson File No.. 13510C Serial: RNPD/92-2849 United States Nuclear Regulatory Corrnissicn Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 H. B. ARnson steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-261 License No. DPR-23 R o tor
.'stemAtic Assessmernt of Licensee Performarce Gentlemen:
Carolina Power and Lin Cofr.pa (CP&L has received and reviewed the Systematic Assessrient of Licensee Perfortnace (ALPx:
a:,;:ted b, let-er dated September 8, 1992. This report provided results from the evalat period of March 31 through June 27, 1992. Also, CP&L had the benefit of comment and discuss-in-r N:RC p:esentat~on of the SALP Report at our faility on September 24, 199 CP&L is pleased witht quanutt.v ratings of the SALP Board which reflect that the overall performance of H, 3. Ruoinsonf wa good az is Inproving. It is encouraging that acknowledgment was made of sigrdficant improvement in th< area of plant operations and sustained superior performance in radiological controls and plint securit The staff at H. B. Robinson Ur", Z A. aware 3f the functional areas where perf)romance was characterized as "mixed", and a6--.:wledge that further management focus and attention is necessary to obtain superior peiranx i i
iuse areis. We recognize that the SALP ratings received dcpend to a certain degree or. ehective.a1d.im y imilenentation of future corrective actions, and we are committed to meeting theSe obrligVicas. Fc r areas where corrective actions are being developed or issues are being addressed, we de ddicated to completing these activities and providing auditable result F Fl. ti
~
I.~E
- '
K'
P~ ri 1, : :'
F'2
united States NuL-ear Reaulitor)' Commrission Serial:. RMI)/92-2849 Page 2 of 2 In dsing th ob~r~~~ r~
- innddons (-f the SALT' Board are appreciated, n ilb used in our con~nuiaie piruces& of e-valuiting and improving overall performance. CP&L1 will continue to strive for excellienC -e the afe -;d-reliabl - operation of H. B. Robinson UnAi Very truly yours, C. R. Dietz Vice President Robinson Nuclear Project Department RDCsgk cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. L W. Garner FROM F
% fl'2 p
- '~M:C P
ENCLOSURE 4 Revision Sheet Page Line Initial Report Reads Final Report Reads Coversheet
Initial SALP Report Final SALP Report
ENCLOSURE INITIAL SALP REPO U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATO COMMISSION
REGION I
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT LICENSEE PERFORMANCE INSPECTIO REPORT NUMBER-261/92-20 CAROLI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY B. ROBINSON UNIT 2 M CH 31, 1991 -
JUNE 27, 1992
ENCLOSURE FINAL SALP REPORT U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE INSPECTION REPORT NUMBER 50-261/92-20 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY H. B. ROBINSON UNIT 2 MARCH 31, 1991 -
JUNE 27, 1992