ML14071A072

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562

ML14071A072
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A072 (41)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/ 5 1Jvp Status: YO NEI UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R17BO02 Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 10 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 72O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[2/N]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YECN/NO U- N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[2'/N0 UO N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y4 ND U] N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI[ NO U[ N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

~~~&E ~ r fA.T, A e

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[d NO U'-

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 351 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F -F7 Sheet 2 of 2I¢' -10 Status: Yo N[O U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiDNo. QIREf7fe2 Equip. i Equipment Description MCC 18 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd ND UD N/AD 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[2fANO U- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yr/ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y4ND UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

0 mnL~dtoa ae may be added as necessary) r L/ 4v I Q~*Jt~ ML~,(T Evaluated by:. ~.Yu'AO Date: 7/to 1/1,P11,~v iv)I (K~) 11/t01tV z

Page 352 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of:;3 ,tkolt 90 Status: Yj'NL-] UF'I]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR178002 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC 1B Photographs I T* dP WF~C 00J THE2ýT~ W~4--

To ppVE=P E-W JAOVe MjMtA 97 t~E:10 TfH.E M~cC LQC-ATACI)0k TI I iEAOT A~J AT Mep- 1 AFthMrC C~)~ ~T C~

Note: Note:

~jn, ~/

Note: Note:

Page 353 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 354 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 355 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 356 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 357 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1\

-,J r

- '%esm Page 358 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 359 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-'3

-J Page 360 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 "T--I -V.n Page 361 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-3

-'t- N-. ,

Page 362 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 363 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 TI

- x ýZ-'

Page 364 of 562

nki 11 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. lalNG io4-mr I-U0, vr'ru Page 365 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,%X she of Status: Y9 NEI U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR178507-A Equip. Classý Equipment Description MCC IN Location: Bldg. DIESEl Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one EI* NUI" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9'Nr1 UlI N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YjN3UQ N/ADJ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE'ND U-] N/AID

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO ND UD N/Alf (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y& NO Ul potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 366 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rC ~

Status: uE%ýINJ U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0IR17B507-A Equip. Class, Equipment Description MCC 1N Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd"NQ U N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI*C]N UI] N/AC]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[2/NE3 UC] N/AC]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*rNC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Plwc-Evaluated' ~-, -z-t [I

-1161- Iq a" M frw"014v.

Page 367 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

.4 Page 368 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r-I I --

i . , I I Page 369 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofsfx' Staturs Y~dNI U1'N]u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class'-2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECTSWITCH Location: Bldg. AUIYU1ARY Floor E. ,*/j4.. Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N§1"1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YNF'<0 U1) N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Ye"NO Ul- N/AQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&NO UID N/Ar

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U- N/AID "

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yrb/NO 1)0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 370 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 CAL Sheeat of Status: YE N[-] U[']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class, 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIV<DOUEJ N/ACJ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[tNF[] U--1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yb/ND U0- N/AQ 1;C'e t-T& r*i or'4Q V-V POT~ -JjC AI r a-XC Z t CV* 10.-'Baed on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yt*"N[o UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE4<cD UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AJVDVf Evaluated by: .... k "* " Date: X - zo'Z-( Y~yk~( x~1a <Z/

Page 371 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 372 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 373 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of Status: YI*N'*"1 UEJ Seismic Walkcdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R168031 Equip. Class, o .

Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[C NEý '

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Ye* U['U N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface */N- U" N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&<CJ UEJ N/AQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO1 Nil UC NI5",

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y1140$F UQ]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 374 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 She~t 2 ofV"1 Status: Yt NEI UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR18B031 Equip. Class2 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects 4

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y3, 1( UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[frlND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y .-'ND- UD N/AD COt,roo T A 00 5-5/ v,ý ,.-.fs,-w, ,.,,,Jj' t- k.,,W .t.. IT-s ,,'C.-

40,, W_-T- O's- hct 5N1C tktkVC . 1& i5j ...

- --ýCL,

- 0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[*-fq" UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y&ýN[]UD]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V6 A.>;

Evaluated by: G1 DX-ýfUAýý

-1 04 1 Date: V.z /.

r. u4¶i4 A_________

Page 375 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 376 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 377 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r14 F~I-Sheet I of 3 Status: YEý N[] Ur"I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area - 3/Z Ai)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) I ,

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y8-N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

sewvALdd.. 3 - Z-o-q 5

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[tA ur- N/A-1

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface U0 N/A]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? ýýNO U!] N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yt< NO UI] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

-5& po-- &e p rd", A,4cAd-- ýt --r Av c, e

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N0"] U!]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 378 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: 71NO] U0[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O1R18B035 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects YA6NO- U["3 N/AD3

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

16N/NH UEJ N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS.-N)D UD] N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free " ~U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NQ UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4 .02 Evaluated by: 5a*a*- 77 1f*.* Date: 9,/o. 2_0/12 L.JA . Hg," ci. tOL' Page 379 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 380 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 S

Sheet 1 of-dý Status: YMN-3 U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOO1A Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yid NOI Ur N/AQ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y,0 NO UO N/AQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yy"NO UO N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/APf (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y)1No UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 381 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of Status: NI- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R21BOO1A Equip. Class, Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER Box Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y)1NO UO N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y) NO UI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NEI U= N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yf ND UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y -NO U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

CommentS (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 2.ZAP Evaluated by Evaluated byDae Date:

clý LLD L-1 (Y

Page 382 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 383 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 384 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 385 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of "L t ',

Status: Y[:f NO uf1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR21EOO9C Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC ,,W.., fio,,* ..

Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. # /it/ Room, Area  ! p/t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NU of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE/INC UO N/AC

/

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[WN" U- N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? /UNO UC N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[* NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Vel~ie'l~b £!OIIIOLVAANWOO ct *QHA2CtoMe FC7z5WS TOP-Q2IR2 w 9C " C,,IIZZI eO9A7 'PAT&V 'W/24/-9* (N07)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y60t"No UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 386 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r, 11 6? ý)ý- fl Sheet 2 off ;jrP1 Status: YiA' N[] UrI] J11dF7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR21EO09C Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIN" UEJ N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[V/NO U"I N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[VN-I UCI N/ACl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ 4/N'- UCI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS(ND Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MOVE Evaluated by:. RWPMKl5 fi &J Date: __ __ __ __

I. 70AI / 'I L/ 9 ,//Ox-

/- 1 1 - I Page 387 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 388 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 389 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 390 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I

a I ~1 Page 391 of 562