NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562
ML14071A065
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A065 (35)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of Status: YrNI U-]Equipment ID No. QIG31HOQIB Equip. Class' 21 P Equipment Description SPENT FUEL. POOL HEA T EXCHANGER TRAIN A Location:

Bldg. AOYL FloorEEl.

Room, Area 4 67 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

-1 7&7(o48 Itr ,1:o 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

&A Q 01. 56~Ate+/ý

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YýIN] UC" N/A-Y&`N UC1 N/AO A Yff NC UC N/A" Y13NO UC N/AD'Y10/N[IU0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 91 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fI-3Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIG31HOOIB Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HEA T EXCHANGER TRAIN A Sheet 2 O Status: Y~rj[ u[]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM KNO UQ N/AO 4 Nn UD N/AUUK N/AO YbNV1 U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NVIO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) sr-gV IVIA, gý &-../ CU Evaluated by:, Ou~l ),peLA~~i-Date: 9, Z 9 ZO 2Z-LL2 /Z6 12-J/ %-- l Page 92 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS w1 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 93 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 94 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of ] o I Status: Yi NM-] UOl[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH11NGASC2506C Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET C Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NI]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[2"NEi ur N/A-Y[3/NO UD N/AD YEJ NO UD N/AD/5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[E NE] U- N/A'-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

4AtCH044A4, CaWer't. V"Ip't) L'S S u & v zHtII I AAC 250ob Do,, C QZ141f Wk PIC, 56 $A (VMW17I- co(WrOO2.IA*R1)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Nn" U[J potentially adverse seismic conditions?

]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 95 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F.-3A Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, GIHIINGASC2506C Equip. Class Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET 4 Sht t 2 of91'9 41K 1, status: 7 N 1o C'Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y9'N] UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y(Ni" UQ NIAQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y Ni"NO U] /A 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[' NO Ui-]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YG(NOD UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cgmments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Ti~ed '4VPJ Dt:_______

-1, ý, k~i lox 4 Dae I- -1 Page 96 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 i Page 97 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1~1 UJ Page 98 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 99 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 mom-0000 Page 100 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 101 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 T W-n Page 102 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 103 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofy r Status: Y[3 NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIHIINGB2504J Equip. Class_Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET J Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorame 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y3/NO UC] N/ACD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[2f NO] UC N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YCZNO UC] NIAC]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YG'NC] UC] N/AC](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

~ &2A'(4 ~/7,Q¶ Vt9A- t>) A(i/~ .~j~~t, I~'4 ~ 4 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[2]/No UC]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.

Page 104 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofK r Status: &NO U0 Fl- 37 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment

[1D No. QIH11NGB2504J Equip. Class_Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET J Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masomy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE/NC UC N/AO Yj NO UC N/AC Y("/NC UC N/AC Y2/NC UC Other Adverrse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[Y NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

CoaMents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: -ýYL)A At Date: __ _ _ _ _Page 105 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-ri-4 (A'I S Page 106 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 (A 4 Page 107 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'a Page 108 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i 2r 3L4 Status: YZ N[:] UO[ JIV(Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH11NGN1S25O3A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description NIS Excore Detector Cabinet Location-Bldg. Au~x Floor El. 155' Room. Area _________________

Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructiors for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardwar'e?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UC N/AC YZ NO UL- N/A[4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ No UC' N/A" 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurations were verified against the configurations of SEWS for QIHI 1NGNIS2503A and Q2H1 1NGNIS2503A.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NC UC N/AC YN NCI U-'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 109 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 j= [-3 1!Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 OfX (/Status: Y0 NQl 4114141 Equipment ID No. QIHIINGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 2Q Equipment Description NIS Excore Detector Cabinet Interaetion Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UrJ N/ACl YZ NO U- N/AC YO NO U- N/Al YS N" U" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO Ur" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessamy) 1,-A I ~I Rvaluated hv~ ~t~nhnn Vuan Paul Miktus Date: 08-21-12 08-21-12 Page 110 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 111 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 112 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 113 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofw /Z Status: Y N-] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QIHI1NGPIC2505C Equip., Equipment Description Process Protectfion Cabineg t Channel 3 Location:

Bldg. Aux Floor El. 155' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3, Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurations were verified against the configurations in SEWS for Q1H1 1NGPIC2505C, Q1HI 1NGPIC2505H and QIHI 1NGSSP2506J.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NO U- N/A-YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO NIA-YO NO U- N/A" YO NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 114 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofkl Status: Y0 NE UEI FI-3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIHI INGPIC2505C Equip. Class, Q Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet Channel 3 Intera~ction Ef fects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NE UD N/AD Y0@ NO UD N/AD YZ ND UQ N/AD YZ NO U-Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated b : P-11 kfikh-I Stephen Yuan b~J( L& 1~ X Date: 08-21-12 08-21-12 Page 115 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-n 7 Page 116 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 117 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 (,J C'Page 118 of 562 A ffl~ f4 trfOiflkI

') A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. )tNl i-o-rmr i-u 1, vR-n,' ,.,)A Page 119 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 120 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 121 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'A E Page 122 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0\1 tN Page 123 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 124 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 125 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-14-0249,_Joseph_M._Farley,_Unit_1,_Enclosure_2,_Updated_Farley_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic_Through_Attachment_3_Page_91_of_562_Through_125_of_562&oldid=877024"