|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14051A7342014-02-20020 February 2014 Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 NL-14-0249, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 22014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 2 ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachme2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0812014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217 ML14071A0802014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 ML14071A0792014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 ML14071A0742014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 ML14071A0772014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 ML14071A0752014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0732014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 ML14071A0722014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0672014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-71 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of '4 Status: YrfNRIU Equipment ID No. Q1P16V579 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description B TRAIN SERVICE WATER MINIFLOW Location:
Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area J2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YI- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YFJ NO UD N/A$)Yr NO UFC] Yrll NO UI- YO NE UO N/A#ý NO UC I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 273 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 H-~ /Sheet 2 ofW Status: Yo N] U07 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP26Y57L.
Equip. Class)Equipment Description 8 TRAIN SERVICE WA TERR MIA!FOW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yý NO UO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý N171 UO N/AOl Yý NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[NE U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A Isc i f ewre Evaluatedby:
... .Date: q/iji2 Page 274 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a1plo-V579 Z Page 275 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 276 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y2 NEI] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. QIP17HOOIC Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CCW HEA T EXCHANGER TRAIN A Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area IR 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- D 2z oG 5' 7 OZ r. (o.o 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible. cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YNQýNO UO N/AO YeNO U- N/A'Y`NO UI- N/A" NYWO U- N/A0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 277 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet92 of 3 Status: Y1 Ni] U[M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17HOO1C Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER TRA)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?ND U" N/AD YXNN- ULD N/AD]tND U" N/AD Y NDU[D Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y/ND UDI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) do VZA S~Ir I~,W &2A -(.--Evaluated by: Date: 2 Z7 _.It1YL~(~4011-S-6 7 6.) 1 -Z/V. *-'r Page 278 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 279 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 f$A Status: NEI U0]F 1- 7. s Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment]ID No. Q IP1 7HV3045 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 0 , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] NO/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE] NE] UE N/A3/YE NE] UE] N/AO'4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[E] NE] UE] N/AE<5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO] N1 UO] N/ANI YE] NE] UE]8n',Sq\ 3rh WIQ ob&O-. o cfEqim nt'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 280 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Status: NJN U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3045 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yt ND UD N/A]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yt NEI U-] N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yd1 NEI UDI N/AD Y[ý NM U-Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[?1 ND UD'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
<-Evaluated by: Date:- z I It 9
- a,- .37 1-.Page 281 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 282 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0ý,A F-U 3 j'I 11 Page 283 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0~.l.Sheet o S .tatus: Yd NO] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QWP17HV3067 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area C a Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchornee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N/25 Yn NE UO N/A" YO0 NO UM NIAV" YO0 NO UQ /A YOE NO UQ N/A@t*YijNEI SA -eIp C nmfoAe 0B: o A'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 284 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Status: Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3067 Equip. Class .7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y['NO UC N/A[YRNCI UIC N/AC YV/NC UC N/AO Yj'NE U1:C Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yjý NC' UCI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date: L&I I I.__521/1 L'-[. al ......Page 285 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOMWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee 3 of 3 Status: N[ U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3067 Equip. Class, 7 Equipmtet Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN PhotovraDhs N" "J Note: Note: Note: Page 286 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofg 7TYr-Status: YE] NJý UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ED No. Q1P17HV3096%.
I. Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW NON-SAFETY ISOLA TION Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Root Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
tYVknfQ yi-'.r YEI NEI UE] N/AEJ YE] NE] Un N/A0'4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/A[0I1 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE] NE] UE] N/A[r YE'NO UE I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 287 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofl "7 Status: YEI N1 UE3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment
]D No. QIPI7HV3096B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW NON-SAFETY ISOLATION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO- NZ'UC N/AQ Or)fq Vscl an kQAf~W o Q 4Y~cj%.LA
'S ý00-D -tc .Qm 'j\NQ. u-Sq t-0 0. ,ý,Q (ýzV6-Alw; Ak\i dmf Q~Y~r 1ý ck1Q&ca ti'o~ Oldc" 01Q0fal sl efl e~t 00,Q" Z>Ock Cqjj 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YUONE- ur N/A " and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 1 rd ta YE] N[E'UO N/AO.Based on te a~iove seismic interaction evafaions, is equipment ree YIJ NO UI 5 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YQ/N- U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: .' -, Date; _ -.-QaL... ~1~ Ill, ~ s'*Lg~ 'Page 288 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 289 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I'I'Page 290 of 562 L ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-+-I --I<Ii Page 291 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 t Page 292 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 293 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofr 'ýStatus: Y&J NO UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3052 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW TO RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 0903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N)of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Entr eui cas ne fm AI.Enter the equipment c[ass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YE) NE) UE) N/A YE) NE UE) N/A[g/YE) NE) UE) N/AW/YE) NE UE N/A)Y4NE) UrE Page 294 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 W-') (-, Sheet 2 ofXLA Status: YtZ NI" UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3052 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CCW TO RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIA ND UD N/AD Yfý- NDI U N/AD YEJ ND LiD N/AD YEZ N' UD Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[j ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: .- 'Date: .Page 295 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 296 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 1: 1 -') c NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ,*t .Aw L-A-Page 297 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 f tll1 Shee 0of3 Status: N U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV31858 Equip, Class, 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEA T EXCHANGER NO 2 Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 1 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorne 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOM1 ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO] NO UO N/A/2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?I ý') -L- I t" F-ý C"kA P L) I,) f- P4 T-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO] NO U- N/AE" 7 YO] NO UC N/Aml7 YO] NO U] NIA YUVNO UO/II b LIN ((0 ?ov j f- --NT I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 298 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[TNE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3.85B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO 2 I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y1NC U- N/AD YENI- U- N/AEI YEN[--O UEI N/AE Y/ UE]Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 16N " U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
J'Jt4...,)Evaluated by: S *% A "(4, Date: z _ ._..__g/2 J2-ya Page 299 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-I Page 300 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0/She 1 of 5 Status: Yý N UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QIP17POOIB Equip. Class!Equipment Description CCW PUMP 1B SWING PUMP Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100 Room, Area ___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
u t ( ( (- Z' /-V 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yjý/NC Y)'*N[ U-" N/ACU'- N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y"KNI" UE] N/AD]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y/NC UC- N/AC]YINI-I UE]' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 301 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of5,6 Status: YEf NO] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, Q1P17POOIB Equip. Class'Equipment Description CCW PUMP 1B SWING PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YPN/-- U0 N/AP-'UD N/AD1 Y9/NO0 U[" N/A Yk/0UO Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZNO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cgmments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: I-WAI 1.& ZS: J,'40J Date: Is. Z,/, zc'/.-I2/ zJ 6 ,,...1 I Page 302 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ART ENPD .DISTANCES E. f SHOULDER AND~IN hAI LIMIT END FLOAT & L OIL LEVUt IN. ABOVE BOTTOM GF FEET 0c CL Page 303 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 304 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'CT Dcc Page 305 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofy" 1 Status: Yd N[ UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17TO01 Equip. Class'Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW)Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 179 Room, Area 0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd 1 No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE4/NE] UD N/A[Yd NE U) N/AC 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YC' NCI UO N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y9/N[] U[C N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO'NC UC-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 306 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y[I N[-] Ur-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP17TO01 Equip. Class, Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y 1ý/NC] U[] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ý'N"] U'] N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[ NEI UO N/AC]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[f NEI UC]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE[/NC] UC]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Date: -') ni -12..-29 -I Z Page 307 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 308 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 A I'1 S Page 309 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 310 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 311 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 312 of 562