ML14071A079

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217
ML14071A079
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A079 (51)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 8 F1-644 Status: YoJ N10 Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class',20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DEISEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (oplional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verifiedper SEWS package dated 5&24/94.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U[3 N/A
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U[3 N/AQ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U[] N/A[]

Several of the anchors have missing grout in a cone-shaped configuration. This condidon was noted In the SEWS package. See Comment 2.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO' UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified per SEWS package dated &24/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Several anchors are missing grout. See Comment 2

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 57 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 8 FJ-o0.4 Status: YO NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H21E527 Equip. Class' W .

Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 LOCAL CONT PANEL interuction E17ects,

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI@ NO 110 N/AO
8. Arc overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YJR NO url NIAO All Internal and external lines areroutedsuch that no adverse seismic condition exists.
10. Based on the above seismic inleraction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO U-0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. External Inspection completed 8/24112. Internals Inspection and anchorage vetfilcatNon performed 1M9/13.
2. As noted In Question 4. several of the anchorbolts aremissing grout In a cone-shaped configuration.This was noted In the SEWS package (&24194) anda subsequentdelaied evaluation showed this condition does not presentan Immediate operablityconcern. Several enhancements have been made to the anchorage incudlag:shlmdrrnga gap between the panel and groutpad; additIonal 3S expansion anchorson the back (North)side of the cabinet; anda 114' plate welded to the frame which Is anchoredby (2)3/8" expansionanchorsnear the font (South) side of the panel. Therefore, this condition Is judged by the SWEs to not be an Immedat concern. However, repairsshould be made to the existinggrout nearthe cast-in-placeanchors.

(Ref. CR 716676)

Page 58 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1 6q(, Sheet 3of 8 Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Daw: I,,/I*---.?

Niko,' Arm,,t /0/9/13 Page 59 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527) Sheet 4 of 8 Page 60 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-046 (QlH21E527) Sheet 5of 8 Page 61 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl1.046 (Q1H21ES27) Sheet 6of 8 Page 62 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527) Sheet 7 of 8 Page 63 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527) Sheet 8 of 8 Page 64 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: YO NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH21NBAFP2605A Equip. Class Equipment Description HOT SW*fJPWN PANEL A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoran-e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration verificationcompleted on 8/28/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UO N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/A-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO Ni3 Ur NlAO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified on 8/28/12 againstSEWS package dated5/94

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on /28/12-IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 65 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YI NE uEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O1H21NBAFP2605A Equip. Class' Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A InteractionEfet

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U[3 NIAO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl9 NE UlI NIAO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO Url NIAn
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N[3 UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetinternalswere Inspected andno missing fasteners were observed. The HSDPcontains a large amount of active andspare cables. All cables were observed to be bundled togetherin sections wih several largeplastic tie wraps and containadequateflex with their currentrouting. The tie wraps siue are large enough to notprevent a risk of cutting the cables duringa seismic event No adverse seismic conditionshave been Identifitd.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed onginalyon 8/28/12.

FInal walkdo~wn performed on 1/25/13 to Inspectcabinet internalsand complete anchorage verification. No adverse seismic conditionsnoted.

Page 66 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos- Date:

I.*

, hSlI3 Tayl/or YounjebI od y ý Page 67 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Page 68 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 69 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 70 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 Of 7 Page 71 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 7 FI.-14%

Status: YO NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H22LOOIE Equip.,

Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET IE .

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND U- N/Al oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO NWAS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/28/12

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 72 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H221.IE Equip. Class Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 1E Interactdon Effects

7. Are soft targm free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YR NO UD NIAD

\ Walkdown performed on 8128/2012 noted possible interaction effects due to a 1-1/2" dla. conduit within 1/4" of the relay cabinet (CR 508376 documents this condition).

This condition has been evaluated in TE 540860 and found to not cause a seismic 2lInteraction concern.

s [L2

_ S. Ae overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI ND3 UDl N/AU3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do aUwched lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damag? YO Nn Un N/An
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y19 NO U3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

AdvYerse Conditions

! . Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[3 U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabiet eale wete kpee and no mss fstwmers wWe observed Thefs Is a loose label on the lower left kirnal tenmnnal This

"&don not pow a bratto Oe moolae equ*nent dkita a seiut1 event Ackhwonsly,apsis camble are bundle at dos botta of the cabne TMese also do not mpresent an advem condltn. AN ntea connectons and routedmbles have been determinedto be adequate and poae no adkierse sefsmic concftkn.

Cmusets(Additonal paoes may be added as necessay)

SWC completed crtglnal on &28/12.

Final wakdown perfrmed on 1/25&13 to Inspect cabinethntmTals No adverseseiic conditions noted.

Page 73 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Dale:

TaylIor Ygunpblinnd eLe.1 '*L~~Q V V- U 112rlL 3 Page 74 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 Of 7 Page 75 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 76 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 77 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Page 78 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YZND [3U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H22LO02 Equip. Class; Equipment Description TR-A&NSFER RELAY CABINET 1 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 347 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO3 U[3 N/AQl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NOi UI- N/AI-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y* NO UEJ N/A[]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/28112 againstSEWS dated

&f26194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI@ N[] UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/28/12.

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 79 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N[3 UDi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H22L ,0Equip. Class, Equipment Description RA-NSiFER- RMAY QABINE 1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 NO UQ NIAIJ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIN NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI@ NE UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO Ni UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetinternals were Inspected and no missing fasteners were observed All internalconnectionsand routedcableshave been determninedto be adequateand pose no adverse seismic condition.

Cormeats (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed orginallyon 8/28/12.

Finalwaikdown performed on 1/25/13 to Inspect cabinetInternals. No adverse seismic conditions noted Addtonalfy, the IPEEEOutlierfrom the IPEEEwalkdowns has been verified to be resolved. The outlierwas to bolt the panel to the adjacentMCC. This has been resolved.

Evaluated by: Ryan Haros el.tlm.111" 9.

Date: j lzrt Taylor Youngbiodd-XI a I Page 80 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet a of s Page 81 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 82 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 83 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ No U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) T-1--15 Equipment ID No. 01H22L503 Equip. Class' Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 16 Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area M Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y19 N[3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package dated 5/24/94. Anchorage Is internalto cabinet.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UD N/AQ
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo N[] U[] NIAQ-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U0 N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified using SEWS for 0 1H22L503, dated 5/24/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 84 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H22L503 , Equip. Class Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1B Interaction Effects

7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N[ UO N/A[
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NC' Ur] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NO UO NlArQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UlI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Ui]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 8/24/12. Second performance being pedormed to inspect cabinet internals andperform anchorageverification.

Cabinet internalsinspectedand anchorageverificationperfbrmed on 1/17/13. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaua~ited hv: flu-nHqrj-...- Date: -- Ib, I 4 Page 85 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 86 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 5 Fl-0S3 Status: YN NEI Ul]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QlN11PT0476 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR IA DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 462 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UC N/An Insulationwas moved to the extent necessaryto Inspect all hardware.

Mounting bofts and otherhardwareare Intact and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y* NiO UC N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO NIAr
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE Un N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 87 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI ul]

Seismic Wtlkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QINIIPT0476 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 1A DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO NIAO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur NIAQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UO~ NIAQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Interaction effects evaluatedduring initial walkdown 8/29/12. No other adverse seismic conditions were noted.

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yfa NO" UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All mountng hardwareIs Intact and In good condition. All cables have adequateflexibility to not pose an adverse seismic condion.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

External Inspecion pedormed on 8/29/12.

Second walkdown performed to inspect Internals and anchoragefound no adverse seismic condtions.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Date: 10/16/13 Nikole Arrant ( . c 10/16/13 Page 88 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-053 (QINllPT0476) Sheet 3 of 5 Page 89 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-053 (Q1N11PTO476) Sheet 4 of S Page 90 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-OS.3 (QI.N11PT0476) Sheet 5 of 5 Page 91 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Fl-0e&3 Status: YS Nr- U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP13HV28670 Equip. Class, 7 ---

Equipment I-scription CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOLATION INSIDE CTMT VALVE Location: Bldg. QTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area 129' ELEVATION Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[3 NE3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inie Cagponen - No anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U- N/A0 Inline Component - No anchorage
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO3 U- N/AI oxidation?

InlIne Component - No anchorage

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE! NE! U[ N/A0 Inllne Component - No anchorage
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YQ3 N[3 UE! N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Inline Component - No anchorage

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Ni U[3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

6Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clames of Equipment.

Page 92 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 F1- 10& 3 Status: YZ No ur0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP13HV2867D Equip. Class'_7_

Hquipment Description CONTAINMENT PURGEISOLATION INSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NO UD N/AI No soft targets were Identified which could be impactedby components or structuresin the area.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO U- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overheadequipment Is adequately supportedandnot likely to cause an adverse seismic condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO U- N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO Nr UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No conditions were Identified which would resultIn a potentially adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area Walk By performed In conjunction with this SWC for Containment 129' Elevation.

Evaluated by: Bran Ne Date: 9 z.,I/

5?oI?

Nikole Ar-r-ant Page 93 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 94 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 95 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ N[ UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01PI6G517B Equip. Class' 2,,,,,0, .

Equipment Description TURBBLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOX Location: Bldg. QDESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area QQ00.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions For Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% or SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS dated 5f25194

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NOI U3 N/AO3 Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UO NIAI oxidation?

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U[3 N/AQI Anchorage confirmed SATan 9/10/12
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U[3 N/AOl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12

' Enter the equipumm class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 96 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01P16G517B Equip. Class' -,20 Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 NO UO NIAO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt9 NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIV NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed SAT originally on 9/10/12.

Finalwalkdown pertomed to inspect cabinetinternals.

Area Walk-by is in FolderF2-89 Evaluated by: Laura M/ 10agwou 0 Date: IJPjL3*

Terr lAulenill& -

Page 97 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Status: YO NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmren ID No. Q1P16G517B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Decription W". 3LD09.WJ _ VALVE RELAYBOX Page 98 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 99 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 8 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status; Y0 NOi u Equipment ID No. 1R1A8M Equip. Class'- 3 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR W Location: Bldg. DIESEL. Floor El. 155' Room, Area 56C Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting results of judgments and other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- Nil UO N/AI Anchorage Is welded to embedded steel perdesign.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UD N/A" oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U[3 N/AU Sea Comment 2
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See Comment 2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See Comment 2 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 100 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YN NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIRISA 504 -- Equip. Class, Equipment Description 4.16K-V SWITC-HGEAR IJ Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UDI N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NiJ Un N/AO' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UD] NIAO3
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NOU[3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEIUO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Internals inspectionperformed to the extent possible. All visible mounting hardware is Intact and in good condtin. See Comment 2 Page 101 of 217

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 3 of 8 F/'-083S" Status: YO NO U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R15AS04 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1.External Inspectionperformed on 9/10/12.

2.Internals Inspection and anchorageverification was performed to the extent possible. All front and rearpanels were removed and Inspected; however, a second, internalpanel was not removed In the rearof the swltchgear. A review of the associatedSEWS packages for 4.16 kV Switchgear shows that QIR15AS04 (WJ) Is bounded by SEWS package for Q1R15A505 (1K), which is the governingpackage for all 4.16 kV Swltchgear. As statedin the SEWS package for Q1R15A503 (1H), additionalInspections were performed to provide a level of confidence that all4.16 kV Switchgearwere installedproperly. An additionalconservative anchoragecalculation(S0-93 8685-001) was performed for six othersimilarswltchgearusing GIP criteriato prove all units had acceplableanchorage.In total, eight switchgearhad visual verification of anchrage which provides a high level of confidence that all swltchgearwere Installedproperly.

3. SWC performed and signed originally on 10/11/13. Revised and re-signed to provide additional Information on anchorageverification.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson m g

  • Date: -Y Nikole Arant(U h~~iJ2 onJ Page 102 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-08S (Q.1R15AS04) Sheet 3 of 7 Page 103 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi-08S (QlRl5A504) Sheet 4of 7 Page 104 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-085 (Q1R15AS04) Sheet 5 of 7 Page 105 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi-OS (Q1R15AS04) Sheet 6 of 7 Page 106 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-085 (Q1R15A504) Sheet 7 of 7 Page 107 of 217

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A079&oldid=2051808"