ML14071A080
| ML14071A080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/2014 |
| From: | Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-14-0249 | |
| Download: ML14071A080 (54) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
. I Sheet 1 Of 5 Status: Yo N:] U-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0IR16B00Q6 Equip. Class' Equipment Description 600V Load Center 10 Location: Bldg. Ai R
Floor El. 139' Room, Area 335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
AnchoraLe I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage In the front of the panel was veriffed in walkdowns dated 8/28112. Anchorage In rear of panel was added to reaolve IPEEE outlier.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
The anchorage in the front and rear of the panel is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO ND Y91 Nr' U-3 N/All Y09 NO U[3 N/AO
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YCM NO Un N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage in front of panel Is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/27/94. Welds attaching load center to steel embeds in rear of panel (Bays 2 5, and 6, EW) were observed as being added to resolve IPEEE outlier.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, Is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO Ui3 NIA-YO NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 108 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[
Nr] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR16B0006 Equip. Class' Equipment Description 600V LoAl Center 1D Interaction Effects
- 7. Ar. soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO Un N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NE Uo N/AQ YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions 1I.
Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The front panels of the 600V Load Center were opened to review the anchorage of the internal components. Ad equipment was adequately restrained with no oose connections and no missing bolts.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC originally completed on 8/28/12. Anchorage in the rear of the cabinet has been provided to resolve IPEEE concerns and was verified by looking through the slats in the back panel of the Load Center. Final walkdown performed to Inspect cabinet internals and complete anchorage verification.
Area walk-by Is located in Folder FI-98 (8/28/2012).
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay
- QJ*T/O
- T.
Terri, Alan M Date:
'iL/3 Page 109 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 110 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 111 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a
Sheet 5 of 5 Page 112 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: YO N[] Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIRI7BO001 Equip.
Equipment Description MCC 1A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified on 8/29/12 per SEWS package dated 5/25/94
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO U0 N/AO YO NOI UO] N/AOI
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Yo NO3 UF" N/All
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified on 8/29/12 per SEWS package dated 5/25/94
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NOI U-] N/AQ YO N0 U0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 113 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO ND ul Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OIR17BO001 Equip. Class, Equipment Description MPCC 1A
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO UD N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl NO UOF N/AF and masonry block walls no( likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
Internals Inspection shows that all Internal lines have adequate flex and do not cause a seismic concern.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Interaction effects were walked down on 8/29/12 with no Interaction effects.
YlU NO u0 NIAO YO NO UO Page 114 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
'Ft-,%qt Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R1780001 Equip.
Equipment Description MCC 1A Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YO ND Ufl Other Advee Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internals Inspection has been performed and the following condition has been documented in CR 719207:
While performing the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown for Farley Unit 1 for 1A MCC, there were two Instances identified where selsmically qualified Agastat Relays were Installed with only three of the four required mounting screws. This condition has previously been evaluated for the 2A MCC, reference TE 640206 for the evaluation, and it has been determined that the current mounting configuration does not adversely Impact the functionality of any of the relays In any of its operating modes (before, during, and after a DBE). The U2 evaluation has been reviewed and is bounding for the conditions found on UI 1A MCC. Therefore, the condition does not bring Into question the operability or functionality of the relays.
Although the relays remain functional and operable, the relays should be reinstalled with the intended mounting configuration of four screws at the earliest opportunity to return margin to the relays.
The relays associated breaker cubicle locations and affected loads are documented below:
BKR FAJ4R - Agastat Relays for BKR FAJ5 (1C CTMT POST ACCIDENT AIR MIXING FAN)
BKR FAJ4L - Agastat Relays for BKR FAIS (ID CTMT POST ACCIDENT AIR MIXING FAN)
Based on the evaluation for the as-found condition of the Agastat relays being acceptable, this condition does not represent an adverse seismic condition.
Y0R NO UO Comments (Addilional pages may be added as necessary)
External insection performed 8/29/12.
Second walidown performed on 10/16/13 to Inspect cabinet Internals. No adverse seismic conditions were noted during the final walkdown.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson
';ý Nikole Arrnant L A a_
Date: 10/11613
!0/16(13 Page 115 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-M8N (WR17BOOO1)
Sheet 4 of 7 Page 116 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-084N (Q11R178O001)
Sheet 5 of 7 Page 117 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-084N (QIR17BO001)
Sheet 6 of 7 Page 118 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-084N (Q1R17BO001)
Sheet 7 of 7 Page 119 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-o0-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R17BO02 Equip. Class' Equipment Description MCCB 1
Sheet i of 8 Status: YN NEI urI Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121!
Room, Area M0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of Ihe following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Ref. SEWS dated 5/26/1994
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO YI NO UI N/AD YO NEI UO N/AI
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Yo NO U] N/A'
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified against SEWS for 0IR17BO02 dated for 5/26/94 during walkdown performed on 9/10/12
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 9/10/12 YIN NO UO N/AF YO NO UO
' Enter the equipment clas name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipmenm Page 120 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YS N[l U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R17B002 Equip. Class Equipment Description MCCJ1B Interaction Effecs
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YI NEI Un N/All
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UQ N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment'?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO U[
N/Al YO NO UQ Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internal connections and outed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed originally on 9/10/12.
IPEEE Outiler was verified to be resolved on 9/12/12.
Final walkdown performed on 2/5/13 to inspect cabinet internals. No adverse seismic conditions were noted.
Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Tn-vIj Ynrrnhlrj;d U- ý'
Date:
Page 121 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet *q of 8 Page 122 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 8 4.
Page 123 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 8 Page 124 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 8 Page 125 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 8 I
/i Page 126 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 8 of 8 Page 127 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECK Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0IR17B0504 Equip.
Equipment Description MCC 1K NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YO NO U"]
Location: Bldg. SWlS Floor El. 188' Room, Area 72E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NEI Ur N/Ar YO NEI UO N/AO YO NO Ul N/AO YO NO Ul NIAO YO NEI UO
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of EquipmenL Page 128 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seimia Wulkdown Chwoldist (SWC)
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 status: YO NEI tiE EqulpmeatIlD No. 2MRI 7350 qulp.
Equlpme~ Description MAcQ 1K
- 7. Are soafk uw free from im t by narby equlpmet or aUcturms?
YO ND UE3 N/AD
- 8. Are overhad dpmLt, dlm'budon systns, calling dies and lighting, YE N[3 U3 bVAD and mIasory block walls not likely to collusa onto th equipment?
- 9. Do aitached lines have adequae flexiblilty to avoid dumsp?
Werymab hwpuclwi show~ tit aI# bteraIli k m ho adeqma law and d not ipoe a ew* coem.
- 10. Bamed on the above seimic nterhmdon evalutdons, Is equipment fiie of potentially adverse seisde interaction effects?
h*a m
- efift wwr tmu ddmo n I/20/1 No rmW
-ffl Ft wokd YB NO U1 N/AD YO ND JE]
II. Hls you looked for and faoud no Oer seismic codidon tha could YE NO3.[3 adversely a~ect the sfay hctions of th equdpment?
to be W ad &* 1h good oolo.
o adae Amenl on*wm nood CIMil p*ltln MmI mIj be added as mmaIp Etma 11frs11: pwamw an w1 Wl/2 Wakvm wd SW perwmed orualy on WV/1713 has been n ed anwd ee Or f
tor.*
This SWC supersedes the SWC contained In Attachment 3 (Pages 347-348).
- 2.
tr2l~ot Evaluated br.
AMWA AnanItýA T~hvin Ymubkod 4 14Q~.c DM&
hz zq4i2Aqb
(ýv i
Page 129 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-086N (Q1R17B0504)
Sheet 3 of 4 MCG I K T R 17 R5 I I Page 130 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-086N (Q11R17B0504)
Sheet 4 of 4 Page 131 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 "11 -Of9'A)
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR17BO507 Equip.
Equipment Description MCC IN Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ ND UD Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 60 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AD YN NO UD N/AD YO NO Ur N/A9 YN NDE U0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 132 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-0V7A)
Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y0 N[3 U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo. 01R1780507 Equip. Class, Equipment Description M1CC IN Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Interaction effects walked down during external Inspection on 8/29/12.
YO NO UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO UC N/AC YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All cables have adequate flex. The leftmost Termnal block in cabinet FNB1 is missing one of the lower mounting screws. This is judged to not be a seismic concern due to the minimal weight of the block (<10 Ibs). Three of four screws are Intact and in good condition. CR 722630 has been written to document this condition and request replacement.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
External inspection performed on 8/29/12.
Anchorage modification has been performed to resolve IPEEE vulnerability. Cabinet has been bolted to back wall to enhance anchorage.
Second walkdown to Inspect internals on 10/18/13 found no adverse seismic conditions.
Secondary walkdown and SWC performed 10/18/13 has been retyped for clarity.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson 1 5ae Nikole Arran( N&ý Dt: 2- /. Zp Page 133 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-087N (Q1111713OS07)
Sheet 3of 6 Page 134 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-087N (Q11117130507)
Sheet 4of 6 Page 135 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-087N (Q01R17B0507)
Sheet S of 6 Page 136 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-087N (Q1R17BOSO7)
Sheet 6of 6 Page 137 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YO NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R18B0029 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description Power Disconnect Switch Location: Bldg. AU Floor El.
A!3 Room, Area W, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of requipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results orjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO N1
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
The anchorage Is free from potentially adverse seismic condilons.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO UQ" N/AD YO NO UO N/AO
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YO NO UO N/AQ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YFI NOI UO NIAO YS NO UO
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 138 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y9 NE uD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R18B029 Equip. Class' Equipment Description Power Disconnect Switch Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO N[
UO NIAO
- 8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIg NO Ur N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO U-N/A-YN NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0R NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All equipment inside the disconnect switch was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC originally completed on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect disconnect switch internals and complete anchorage verification.
Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.
Evaluated by: Laura Macla, Ter Alan Mulle...
Date:
-/13 WOO~ 13
\\J\\,i V C
Page 139 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Page 140 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 141 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YO NEI U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R18B0031 Equip. Class Equipment Description Circuit Breaker Box Location: Bldg. A@
Floor El. la3 Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoru I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO
- 2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
The anchorage is free from potentially adverse seismic condlons.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NEI UD N/Al YO NO U-N/A-
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YO NO U" N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO UF N/AO YO Ni UO
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 142 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y10 NEI Uf-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 010180=31 Equip. Class' Equipment Description C-Irziut Weke Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO UO NIAI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
YO NO U-NIAQ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All equipment inside the circuit breaker box was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC originally completed on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect circuit breaker box internals and complete anchorage verification.
Area walk-by completed 8/29/12..
Evaluated by: Laura Macia C4 Terr Alan Mullel\\1.o Date:
i h -3 f Z013 V &,v Page 143 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 144 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 145 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[
NFI UEF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OIR18B035 Equip.
Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area
!21 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional hut recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorafe I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one or the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified using SEWS dated 3/20/95 on 9/10/12
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verfied to match SEWS on 9/10/12
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 YO N[3 YO Nr-UO N/AI YO Nil UI-N/AI YO NO' UO] N/AQl YO N[3 UO-N/AQ-YO NEl UF" I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes or Equipment.
Page 146 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YI N[ U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Classý Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NOI UO NIAD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO UO N/AQ YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yj@ NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 9/10/12.
Final walkdown performed to inspect cabinet internals.
Area walk-by completed 9/1012012 Evaluated by: Laura Maclaid
-C Y
1 1AA Ten-vAlan M-U&le/
LaQ k..
tDI Date:
Kýi KJ '*' -1 (-I Page 147 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 148 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 149 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y0 N[i UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. O1R21BOOlA Equip. Class Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY. Floor El. 1,V Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorsee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one or the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10&25/12
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10125/12
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10125/12
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10/25/12 YO NO UD N/AQ YO NO Ul N/AQ YO NR UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 150 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] u[r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOOIA Equip. Class' Equipment Description yVTALAC BREAKER BOX Interaction Effeefti
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YS NO UO N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UF' N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO uo N/AQ YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YOl NO UEO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 10/25/12.
Final walkdown performed to inspect cabinet internals.
Area walk-by completed 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: Laura Maclav 4W Ter rAlan M In Date:
I/*l'l Page 151 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Page 152 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 153 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of"4 Status: Y; N[] U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R21E2 Equip. Class' 14 E-quipmnent Description INVERTER 1C Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121' Room, Area 226 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions rot Completing aCecklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may he used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end or this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NOI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YCR NO Ul N/AO YO NO U-I N/AQ
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Ylg NO U-I NIAO
- 5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration verified on 9/WI/12 per SEWS package dated 5124(94.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YS NO UO N/AO Y0 NO U-1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clases or Equipmet.
Page 154 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/-e1g-Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Yo No u[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIRRIEO009C Equip.
Equipment Description INVERffTER IC Interaction Effect%
- 7. Are sort targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO NO UED N/AO3 YO NO UO' N/AD YO NO' Ur3 N/AD Y0NO UIO Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI[
NO 1.u13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All cards, relays, and other sensitive equipment Is adequatey mounted and In good condition. All cables have adequate flex. No adverse seismic condtlons were noted.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson l
Nikole Arrant Q 2 h_
c Date:
!/
/1 I
r Page 155 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-092 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 156 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-092 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 157 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO.,'
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0Q1S 11 Equip. Class,.
Equipment Description !L1KVY SW1*ARIL2 X SURGE ARRESTOR SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Yi Nil UO3 w
Location: Bldg. DES&
, Floor El. 1 HM Room, Area g=I6 Manuracturer. Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)
I o
for Completing C cklis This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findinis. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
afukmn I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (I.e, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y0 NO
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Conm dSAT OnILIWf 1/30/2013 \\,
1'1101
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is mom than mild surface oxidation?
0w
,8A T m 1.43*r113012013*
-2,jt3)21+-
- 4. Is the anchorap free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Co*YmdSATon4A 2"130/2013 a
- -x I 131Wt
- 5. Is the anchore configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorap configuration verification Is required.)
SEWa Pacag daded S&6194. Ve~*d4. 11 d&t &lW wah in t0 muewl.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ConfnrdSATwnJAVft* 1/30/2013 q*b~u -a I;loWi
,Ea i equiaa cldo nae from Appoix B: Osum of EquiumL YN NO UO NIAO YNO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AD YO NO UO N/AO YONE3UO Page 158 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y0 NO" U["
Equipment ID No. 01R36A511 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IL SURGE ARRESTOR Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
There are three cables in the panel, only two are restrained with zip ties (see picture). However, this does not pose a seismic risk as there is adequate clearance around the unrestrained cable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YO Ni3 UDI N/AD-YO N[3 Url N/All YCM N[3 U[3 N/AD YC! Nil Ul" Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC9 NDI UED adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinet door was opened and Internals were inspected and found to pose no adverse conditions. All cables were adequately restrained, no loose connections and no missing bolts were noted.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed originally on 8/24/12.
Final walkdown performed to inspect cabinet internals and complete anchorage verification on 1/30/13.
Area walk-by completed with Q2R1 18507.
Evaluated by:
ra M Tern-AMatn Muleiý, 42 f...
Date:
2/12,/ 1, 1 /
\\11"Y V -
U Page 159 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 160 of 217
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 i
Page 161 of 217 I