ML14071A067

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562
ML14071A067
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A067 (36)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet iofY4 S iF1" Status: Y[O NI] UfI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0QH21E005-1 3 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWMTCHGEAR 1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area _ --._--

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorace

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y& NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NO' UE N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y] No- UV N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y16 NEo Uri N/AF-1 CINC  ;ý ý "'N C x Vx Qix V, ( -

(>)~ 'ý*

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-] NO UE N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yr-] NEU potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 161 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2of "q Status: Yi ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H21EO05 Equip. ClassW 20 Equipment Description 4.1J6KV SWITCHGEAR 1G LOCALCONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YQ NO UO N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y16 NCI UI N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yt NC UC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y1 NM UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by- D T_ I(--Q Date: QL ý_ IZý- _

/ ~ ~ JLj<C~l~)hrAT 6-JcýZ A Page 162 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 163 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

/

Page 164 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofZ fl-Ii-L Status: YE] NE- UJ01 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Waikdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

P.~?rSC SF-VAS, Ack.,c S 124 (ck

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UR(N/A0 CV,0, 6L ,-03 C. V 6C v c ,-;D%*,* 0 04*,, -- ' w u,,A -

-to c->r- cc,6,-.a*4- -a,, -ces" a-.cl-r*-oje.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U/0 N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YQ NO U1 "N/AQ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO Uyl'N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UP, potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 (a

Status: Sheet 2 of 2-Y[E] Nr!] U0' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) S Equipment ID No. 01H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yp3NO UO N/AQ 1 -K '/

4' 4 * . 7.-nv... - - e.

&C 44- ' X*1 pj 41L.. ~tI.- 4o~ Ac 4er~e nics 4'4- Cccf%&VI- reAAW.v*. 1 41ýe pm,,1 Asn "L' I6rak4 -js 'tAlc)4 rc~~v, 44-.~~ ~ ~o~ i- ý.t 4,o 41-t ~wa. P

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling dies and lighting, Y4 NO U N/IAO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

4-.jrCtcc>A;,eiýe ,NA-. -sv 4cA-c~; l: ,, 4c '

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y*'N[I UO N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yq'NO UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y,**No UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,f*ya." 14.A, s Date: '45A.-zC

/0 /5 Page 166 of 562

CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN I-% 1 c

'a.,1 t.14

(

(i" "2 /

1777 7 Page 167 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 go Page 168 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 lF.-44 - S"-.4 I rrow bebw is to show the cwentabon jwheh points from Floor to Ced Page 169 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 170 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F' 4s, Sheet I of 19 Status: YO NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E506 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area -72,*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y51 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NOI U/I* N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO Uý' N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UX NiAO Y171I NMl Uý' N/AII
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 171 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of %4 FO-'iS Status: YI NO UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E506 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NE UO N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yý NO U- N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? ý NO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yk NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could A NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) fp~sl oMarv'-'

Evaluated b-/ l,!tA, Date: 15lz0,/2-1 L

lcI\I AMU~~ TnQOhlLeii C Page 172 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

~11

~r.

C'

£ Page 173 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,f..q-,. (%siEe) ....... ..... ........

kr ti Page 174 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of Xf Status: YD NE] U@

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H21E527 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area C.Cf Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y3Q NEI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

loot- vis bt. cd.* -Hr"C o& wial43own.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YC77 NC U0 N/A"
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO] NC UA N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U3 N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NC U[I5 N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO' NEI U2 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 175 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 P1Iiqf Sheet 2 of "

Status: YLI NEI uO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y% NO ur-] N/A[

4p~e~i c AVI-L ~* A-4k Wb~e4WrM e.-j

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y$ NEI U- N/A]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

CIm t IV3

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YNO uo N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NO UO-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N i U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? /

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

. ."S0

- - - N=ý Evaluated'  : 2 / ~ 4.IlJ.(LL~yeDate: B~

'I

ýýia L~Q&L~ r\Acte4a~f Q'-Z'+-jrz 6-Page 176 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 177 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 CA E:

Page 178 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fýt 7 Sheet 1of 'r-.

Status: Y[] N1 U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH21NBAFP2605A Equip.

Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 7( Z*-54 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NCI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? I-
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Ya NC UC N/ACI
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y- NCI UCI N/A[]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YU NCI UC N/AC Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YA NC UC] N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification isrequired.)

Ie-ves-vc.?ny-W8C, 6/q4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 179 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of/

FVP1 Status: Y[] NT3U[1]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH21NBAFP2605A Equip.

Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y14NDNOU N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UD" N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y1 NE UO N/AD
10. Based on the above.seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y;ND NOID of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] N LD U

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A cabCrym- t4nor my or bPCO ThAa MAines *g is /dde CoMmenUts(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: JUUA& "QY *o

  • tc¶ 4GW.UW-C* Madcq*I Date: [,9/L/ILZ Page 180 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 7N Page 181 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,1~ - i-I

/ i', .1-Page 182 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 183 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of WO5 Status: YE] NO U[1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH22LOOIE, PkA Equip. Class, 20 FI-48 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 1E Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 139 Room, Area 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N] UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] UQ N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YCD NEI U-I N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y] NO UD N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

4 spring nuts used to mount panel to unistrutsupport.cannot find associateddrawing.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 184 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of0 "

Status: YE] NW IU[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q¢H22LOOIE Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 1E Interaction Effects

,/

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N,[*JC U 0 N/AD

-- IU

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y\*, ND U(] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NND UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD Ný UD" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yi4N'- UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? /-'

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.4 Date: 2P zell..

Evaluatedl'Y: Te fayA Ltki~r Page 185 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

  • ~1 N

Page 186 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 187 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Flq.. 9Cs w,,-)

Page 188 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 S heau of - 4 Status:-~NO U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH22LO02 Equip. Clasal 20 Equipment Description TRAN-MFER RELAY CABINET I Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El, SWW 01AW Root Manufactuer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completiag Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

4 U-st- & 014IL G-Z&-?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y/N6 U- N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface "*KO3 UI N/AQ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? VU /N[3UN/AU
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y " NO Ur N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YLY4NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment clas name fIom Appendix 8: Classes of EquipmCnL Page 189 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 p-I d)-

4 Sheet 2 ofX Status: YeNO UCO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01H22L002 Equip. Class' 2a Equipment Descnption TRANSFER RELAY CABINET I

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YV UO N/AD3
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution sysmt , ceiling tile. and lighting, U13 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

"*I]u0 ,:

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? UO N/A[]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditons

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could *1N U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A/

AA 10 Wý.4-a.. V *wea*,* vj

~4If~

o W1+

ý/d I~I j X F..;, ý

~~10 PA W .

Date: 9. 2 f(, 2tZ.1 I

TM Llý YAA*&Lo-D ,..-A &JA/ *=Q -

Page 190 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ij Page 191 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r-f' qoq

-/ y Page 192 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FvI t)

Sheet 1of 4-Status: YE[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIH22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Descri

  • LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1B

-DIESEL Location: Bldg. _________ Floor El. 155 Room, Area SP__ _

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YFNO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Afhc*ýCn G IS 11siAe Of- CAl`,d't CI d 'u

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO Ulg N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UEA N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YDI NO U[1 N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U1 N/AD]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Rcf- . ¢-W-t#* pctCk.,:ij (jQ.4 J-2.4-9 .

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Nn UX potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 193 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of$4 S1- so Seismic Watkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: YE] N[] Uf4 Equipment ID No. QtH22L503 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YCM NO UO N/AO "A"" 10C wte41ae(4 \2 eL V*1 A46 wkkiaj A-~ aA 4T
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo No UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y% ND UO N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[b NO U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

~a~Oh 16DY- Mohrv% 59 %5. V~v-fhc% 1 ~ C ~

Evaluated by: M ýý~k UL4ara M CIVWacV Date: S f 2-(I F" T1iwj4w4 F1L4A lwi.ntI\

6,-1V,4 -(Z-

/ (V-  !

Page 194 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 195 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 196 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A067&oldid=2453525"