(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance
- Supplement
|
MONTHYEARML1006401882010-03-0505 March 2010 Charter for the Groundwater Contamination Task Force Project stage: Request SBK-L-10077, Application for Renewed Operating License2010-05-25025 May 2010 Application for Renewed Operating License Project stage: Request ML1016203312010-06-0101 June 2010 Drawing LR-001 Through Drawing PID-1-CO-LR20423, Rev. 14 Project stage: Request ML1016203332010-06-0101 June 2010 Drawing PID-1-CO-LR20426, Rev. 30, Through Drawing PID-1-DW-LR20600, Rev. 11 Project stage: Request SBK-L-10095, Drawing PID-1-MAH-LR20497, Rev. 9, Through Drawing PID-1-SF-LR204822010-06-0101 June 2010 Drawing PID-1-MAH-LR20497, Rev. 9, Through Drawing PID-1-SF-LR20482 Project stage: Request ML1016203342010-06-0101 June 2010 Drawing PID-1-DW-LR20601, Rev. 1, Through Drawing PID-1-MAH-LR20496, Rev. 12 Project stage: Request ML1016203292010-06-0101 June 2010 Drawing PID-1-SF-LR20483, Rev. 15, Through Drawing PID-1-WT-LR20041, Rev. 7 Project stage: Request ML1016803692010-06-17017 June 2010 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-10-14) Project stage: Request ML1022205712010-08-10010 August 2010 License Renewal Process Overview and Scoping Public Meeting Slides Project stage: Meeting ML1024200372010-08-19019 August 2010 Comment (1) of Maggie Hassan on Behalf of Constituents Different Opinion on the Relicensing of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant Project stage: Request ML1025202072010-08-19019 August 2010 Transcript for Evening Public Scoping Meeting ISO Seabrook LRA SEIS Project stage: Request ML1025201832010-08-19019 August 2010 Transcript for Afternoon Public Scoping Meeting ISO Seabrook LRA SEIS, August 19, 2010. Pp 1-88 Project stage: Request ML1025002712010-08-23023 August 2010 Comment (2) of William R. Harris, on Behalf of Self, on Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Application for Renewal of License for Seabrook Project stage: Request ML1024200432010-08-25025 August 2010 Comment (3) of William Harris, Additional Reference Document for Seabrook Relicensing Environmental Review - Threat Assessment of Emp for Critical Infrastructure Project stage: Request ML1024505252010-09-0101 September 2010 Comment (4) of Geordie Vining on Behalf of Himself Opposing Relicensing Seabrook Plant for the Years 2030-2050 Project stage: Request ML1026504862010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (6) of Joseph W. Fahey on Behalf of Amesbury on Environmental Impact & Mitigation Scoping for Relicensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant Project stage: Request ML1026403712010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (6) of Joyce Kemp, Opposing NRC-2010-0206-0002, Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, Etc.: Nextera Energy Seabrook; Seabrook Station (Unit 1) Project stage: Request ML1026603312010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (7) of Andrew R. Port on Behalf of City of Newburyport Office of Planning & Development on Environmental Scoping Review Regarding Application for an Operating License Extension for Seabrook, Unit 1 from Year 2030 to Year 2050 Project stage: Request ML1025202222010-09-20020 September 2010 Summary of Public License Renewal Overview and Environmental Scoping Meeting Related to the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. ME3959 and ME4028) Project stage: Meeting ML1028612172010-10-29029 October 2010 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application Environmental Review Project stage: RAI ML1030808802010-11-0404 November 2010 Letter from Nhdes to NextEra Energy Seabrook Czma Compliance for the Seabrook LRA Project stage: Request ML1030700562010-11-0808 November 2010 Environmental Project Manager Change for the License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1 Project stage: Other ML1029502712010-11-10010 November 2010 10/05-07/2010-Summary of Site Audit Related to the Review of the License Renewal Application for Seabrook Station, Unit 1 Project stage: Approval ML1030902152010-11-16016 November 2010 Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application-SAMA Review Project stage: RAI ML1033701692010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 2, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033603262010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 6, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI SBK-L-10185, Attachment 1 to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report.2010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 1 to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report. Project stage: Response to RAI SBK-L-10190, Response to Request for Additional Information, Submittal of Cultural Resource Plan in Accordance with 36 CFR 800.11 (C)2010-11-23023 November 2010 Response to Request for Additional Information, Submittal of Cultural Resource Plan in Accordance with 36 CFR 800.11 (C) Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033506392010-11-23023 November 2010 Seabrook Station - Response to Request for Additional Information - NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report Project stage: Response to RAI ML1101003122010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 1, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1101003112010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 1, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033701672010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 3 to SBK-L-10185 -Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information, NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033700922010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 3, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033603112010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 2, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033603062010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 4, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033603002010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 7, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1033602982010-11-23023 November 2010 Attachment 2, Vol. 5, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit Project stage: Response to RAI ML1029806932010-12-21021 December 2010 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on 10/21/10 Btw the USNRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application Project stage: RAI ML1033602122010-12-31031 December 2010 NUREG-1437 Supplement 38 Vol 2, (3:3) Appendix A-761 - End Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Public Comments Project stage: Other ML1033602092010-12-31031 December 2010 NUREG-1437 Supplement 38 Vol 2, (2:3) Appendix A-454 - A-760 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Public Comments Project stage: Other ML1033504382010-12-31031 December 2010 NUREG-1437 Supplement 38 Vol 2, (1:3) Cover - Appendix A-453 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Public Comments Project stage: Acceptance Review ML1033504422010-12-31031 December 2010 NUREG-1437 Supplement 38 Vol 3 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Public Comments Continued, Appendices Project stage: Acceptance Review ML1035704012011-01-0303 January 2011 12/21/2010-Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, Concerning the RAI Pertaining to the Seabrook Station, License Renewal Application Project stage: RAI SBK-L-11001, Response to Request for Additional Information, NextEra Energy License Renewal Application2011-01-13013 January 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information, NextEra Energy License Renewal Application Project stage: Response to RAI SBK-L-11031, Environmental Permit Renewals2011-02-18018 February 2011 Environmental Permit Renewals Project stage: Request ML1104901652011-02-28028 February 2011 02/15/2011 Summary of Telephone Conference Call with the USNRC and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, to Clarify the Responses to the RAIs Pertaining to the SAMA Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application Project stage: RAI ML1105603622011-03-0101 March 2011 2/3/11 Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Held Between the USNRC and Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC, to Clarify Information Pertaining to the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application Project stage: Approval ML1101001132011-03-0101 March 2011 Issuance of Environmental Scoping Summary Report Associated with the Staff'S Review of the Application by Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC for Renewal of the Operating License for Seabrook Station Project stage: Approval ML1105906382011-03-0404 March 2011 Schedule Revision and Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Seabrook Station License Renewal Application Environmental Review Project stage: RAI SBK-L-11044, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Environmental Report2011-03-16016 March 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Environmental Report Project stage: Response to RAI 2010-08-10
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML17059D1202017-02-22022 February 2017 Comment (1) of Kat Mcghee on Seabrook Power Plant ML14171A4052014-06-17017 June 2014 Comment (6) of James M. Petro, on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2014-XX, Tornado Missile Protection. ML13190A0112013-06-30030 June 2013 Comment(1) of William R. Harris on Behalf of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on the 2nd Supp Environmental Impact Statement for Seabrook Station No. Unit 1 ML13189A1282013-06-28028 June 2013 Comment (2) of Timothy Timmermann on Behalf of Environmental Protection Agency on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 46 Regarding Seabrook ML13207A1062013-06-27027 June 2013 Comment (137) of Timothy W. Drew on Behalf of State of Nw, Dept. of Environmental Services, on Supplemental Environmental Impacts Statement -NH Des ML13190A0082013-05-31031 May 2013 Comment (32) of Douglas E. Grout on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish and Game Department on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1 ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012 Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012 Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012 Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12132A1332012-05-0707 May 2012 Comment (31) of William R. Harris of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Relating to the Prevention and Mitigation of Station Blackout ML12125A2632012-04-29029 April 2012 Comment (30) of William R. Harris on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1, for the Term April 1, 2030 Through March 31, 2050 ML12094A0952012-03-21021 March 2012 Comment (29) of Susan Kepner Opposing NextEra Energy Resources LLC for Licensing from 2030-2050 of the Seabrook Power Plant in Seabrook, Nh ML12083A0562012-03-12012 March 2012 Comment (28) of Donald Tilbury Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant ML11304A0592011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (17) of Timothy Timmerman, on Behalf of H. Curtis Spalding, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear P ML11304A2432011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (16) of Mary Lampert, Raymond Shadis, & David Agnew, on Seabrook NUREG-1437, Supplement 46, Section 5.0 - October 26, 2011 ML11304A0552011-10-26026 October 2011 Comments (21) of William R. Harris & Thomas S. Popik, on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies, on NRC-2010-0206, Seabrook Station License Renewal for March 2030-March 2050 ML11304A0582011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (18) of Kelvin Allen Brooks on Behalf of Nh Dept of Justice, Office of the Attorney General on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML11304A0542011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (22) of Steven Athearn on Behalf of Self on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML11304A0522011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (24) of Richard A. Knight on Behalf of Himself Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License for Another 20 Years ML11304A0562011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (20) of Doug Bogen on Behalf of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML11304A0572011-10-26026 October 2011 Comment (19) of Peter Colosi, on Behalf of National Marine Fisheries Service, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants & Public Meetings for License Ren ML11301A0992011-10-25025 October 2011 Comment (15) of Andrew Raddant, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, Notice of Availability of Draft 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Rene ML11304A0532011-10-25025 October 2011 Comment (23) of Robin D. Willits, on Deis of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire ML11301A0742011-10-25025 October 2011 Comment (13) of Timothy W. Drew, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Environmental Services, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement fo ML11301A0752011-10-25025 October 2011 Comment (14) of Ilse Andrews, on Behalf of Sapl on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License ML11301A0732011-10-24024 October 2011 Comment (12) of Douglas E. Grout, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Marine Fisheries Division, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statemen ML11300A0102011-10-23023 October 2011 Comment (11) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for Li ML11300A0092011-10-23023 October 2011 Comment (10) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 496 to the Generic EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Renewal of Seabrook ML11305A0112011-10-20020 October 2011 Comment (25) of Donald E. Tilbury, on Behalf of Himself, Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License ML11308A0312011-10-20020 October 2011 Comment (27) of Filson and Shirley Glanz Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant ML11287A0382011-10-12012 October 2011 Comment (9) of Mary Broderick, on Seabrook Station, Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Division of License Renewal, NRC-2010-0206 ML11266A1532011-09-22022 September 2011 Comment (5) of Max Abramson, on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Division of License Renewal ML11265A2202011-09-20020 September 2011 Comment (4) of Sandra Koski Re NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for the License Renewal of Se ML11279A1192011-09-15015 September 2011 Comment (8) of William R. Harris on Environmental Risk Management & Mitigation Issues That Are Essential for NRC to Analyze in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Relicensing of Seabrook Station Unit 1 ML11257A0882011-09-0101 September 2011 Comment (2) of Brona Simon of State of Ma, Historical Commission on Seabrook Station License Renewal Application ML11242A1112011-08-17017 August 2011 Comment (1) of Edna Feighner on Behalf of New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Seabrook Station License Renewal ML1108005362011-03-18018 March 2011 Comment (7) of Larry Nicholson, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary, Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages. ML1026603312010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (7) of Andrew R. Port on Behalf of City of Newburyport Office of Planning & Development on Environmental Scoping Review Regarding Application for an Operating License Extension for Seabrook, Unit 1 from Year 2030 to Year 2050 ML1026403712010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (6) of Joyce Kemp, Opposing NRC-2010-0206-0002, Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, Etc.: Nextera Energy Seabrook; Seabrook Station (Unit 1) ML1026504862010-09-20020 September 2010 Comment (6) of Joseph W. Fahey on Behalf of Amesbury on Environmental Impact & Mitigation Scoping for Relicensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant ML1024505252010-09-0101 September 2010 Comment (4) of Geordie Vining on Behalf of Himself Opposing Relicensing Seabrook Plant for the Years 2030-2050 ML1024200432010-08-25025 August 2010 Comment (3) of William Harris, Additional Reference Document for Seabrook Relicensing Environmental Review - Threat Assessment of Emp for Critical Infrastructure ML1025002712010-08-23023 August 2010 Comment (2) of William R. Harris, on Behalf of Self, on Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Application for Renewal of License for Seabrook ML1024200372010-08-19019 August 2010 Comment (1) of Maggie Hassan on Behalf of Constituents Different Opinion on the Relicensing of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant ML0931002132009-10-19019 October 2009 Comment (8) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on NRC-2008-0122 Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations, Proposed Rule ML0919003682009-07-0101 July 2009 Comment (1) of David Egonis on Behalf of NextEra Energy Seabrook Station on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222 ML0319704012003-07-14014 July 2003 Comment (6) by R.S. Kundalkar Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Requirements for Steam Generator Tube Inspection - 68 Fr 25909 2017-02-22
[Table view] |
Text
ea Amesbury Joseph W. Fahey Director, Community and Economic Development Tel: (978) 388-8110 Fax: (978) 388-6727 joQAmnesburxma.gov J 62 Friend Street Second Floor Amesbury, MA 01913 September 20,2010 113 Mr. Jeremy Susco- /6 A?, Environmental Project Manager Division of License Renewal " Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Nuclear Regulatory Commission W4shington, D.C. 20555 Re.- Nu& er rv Commission
-Environmental Impact & M0l4aton ScMtng for Rellcenulnn' of the Seabrook Nuclear pint, Docket NRC-20.! 02O6 Renewal of Onvwatino Lie&ow NAa VPF..R6 )Vkrtra En-ora, Xahrmak LLC Daeket Nn. 50.443.C--(J-w U:>.-77.
Dear Mr. Susco,
As you are well aware, MassDOT is preparing to replace the Whittier Bridge-which crosses the Merrimack River between Amesbury and Newburyport, MA along Interstate 1-95. The Whittier Bridge represents a key bottleneck and vulnerability point between the two communities and the estimated 75,000 vehicle trips per day that move between New Hampshire and Massachusetts.
As part of the licensing requirements in 1990 when the Plant was originally permitted, evacuation capabilities for the resident population largely depend upon Route 110 In Amesbury and Salisbury as well as 1-95 southbound across the Whittier Bridge. As. such, recent advances in the US DOT "intelligent transportation" technologies provide significant opportunities for automated traffic signal synchronization
-. using remotely signaled algorithms for contra flow evacuations, and for changes in red/green ratios for other highway connectors.
Thus, there are opportunities to now model arterial vehicular networks, and identify and eliminate bottlenecks for evacuation, Given the significant traffic flows and transportation-related improvements being designed for the arterial backbone of Seabrook's evacuation plan we are requesting that the re-licensing hearing consider new environmental and safety impacts. This is first real opportunity for federal re-evaluation of Evacuation Plans for communities within 10 miles of the Plant since 1990, when Massachusetts Governor Dukakis refused to accept the evacuation plan because it was inadequate and impractical.
Beach populations In summer are roughly double what they were in year 1990.As a result, we are requesting that the regional communities participate in a Demonstration Program, sponsored by USDOT, that would:* Incorporate emergency traffic modeling on a regional basis. Some of these modeling and traffle signalization capabilities have the added benefit of improving regional traffic flow during summer peaking and weekend peaking demand for vehicular travel in the region -while also improving emergency management;
- Our region has near-saturation ofcoastal roadways, and at times total saturation during"beach" visitation surges. See the Whittier Bridge traffio projections, increasing from about 77,000 trips per day in coming decades. MassDOT's draft EIR is pending for this.project which will provide additional baseline data for modeling;6/U'SJ A' Page 2 of 2* Incorporate improved near-real-time "plume analysis" for radiation contingencies as considered generically in NUREG-1555,Section V (pp 513 -547);* Harness improved, declassified plume modeling techniques of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which that agency would make available to the NRC or the Department of Homeland Security in an emergency, for selection of evacuation zones by stages and non-evacuation zones under an Incident Commander;
- Augment the existing 18 (Geiger Counter) sensor and reporting system in northeastern Massachusetts communities, including the Town of Amesbury.
Supplement the 18 existing sites with about 32 additional sites, mainly in southern New Hampshire, thereby improving near-real-time radiation monitoring and most likely reducing the zones requiring evacuation, making the evacuation plan more realistic and less likely to expose evacuees in stalled vehicles to radiation without building protection for occupants; 0 Improve the reliability of regional radiation monitoring capabilities by identifying low-cost redundant capabilities (e.g. backup batteries for each of the 18 existing sensor sites)and redundant data links so an incident commander could obtain near-real-time radiation monitoring reports even if Seabrook produces no net electrical power and if the regional electric grid is temporarily inoperable;
- Improve emergency coordination between Northern Massachusetts and Southern New Hampshire, both at the state-to-state level and through a Demonstration Program involving the local municipalities in the region of the Seabrook station. Utilize the U.S.Dept of Transportation Modeling Capabilities (Office of Emergency Operations in US DOT) and use the "lessons learned" from Hurricane contra flow operations; and a Supporting Regional planning whereby utilizing expansion of 1-95 from 3 to 4 lanes to the New Hampshire border (8 or 9 lanes of contra flow compared to 5 or 6 now) will induce further growth pressures and traffic congestion.
The study should harness the existing technologies for synchronized traffic signalization for all Merrimack River crossings, for Highways 110 and 286, and ramp improvements for 1-95 and 1-495 at the Highway I 10 connectors now under modernization.
The same technologies
-- using solar panel rechargeable LED signals with remotely re-programmable software -- could assure more effective contra flow evacuation and save lives of law enforcement personnel
--who need not be exposed to direct traffic that can be done by synchronized signals in most hot spots along the corridor.
Signal synchronization software also reduce vehicle congestion stops, fuel usage, air pollution, and economic losses due to regional transportation congestion.
In closing, we are seeking to lay out a proposal that will meet the federal "requirements" for relicensing and we are providing a foundation for Regional Traffic Congestion
& Emergency Evacuation Grant opportunities for our community and the surrounding region. In designating our Region a "Model Evacuation Demonstration Grant Area", we are seeking U.S. DOT support to use state-of-the-art traffic management support, build upon our regional planning capabilities, and fund this regional transportation mitigation and management effort, I thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions regarding this request.WRe ectfui a , Director Office of ommunity and Economic Development cc: Mayor Thatcher W. Kezer III Richard Plasse, Safety Project Manager -Division of License Renewal richard.plasse(nrc.gov