|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML17059D1202017-02-22022 February 2017
Comment (1) of Kat Mcghee on Seabrook Power Plant
ML14171A4052014-06-17017 June 2014
Comment (6) of James M. Petro, on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2014-XX, Tornado Missile Protection.
ML13190A0112013-06-30030 June 2013
Comment(1) of William R. Harris on Behalf of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on the 2nd Supp Environmental Impact Statement for Seabrook Station No. Unit 1
ML13189A1282013-06-28028 June 2013
Comment (2) of Timothy Timmermann on Behalf of Environmental Protection Agency on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 46 Regarding Seabrook
ML13207A1062013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (137) of Timothy W. Drew on Behalf of State of Nw, Dept. of Environmental Services, on Supplemental Environmental Impacts Statement -NH Des
ML13190A0082013-05-31031 May 2013
Comment (32) of Douglas E. Grout on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish and Game Department on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12132A1332012-05-0707 May 2012
Comment (31) of William R. Harris of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Relating to the Prevention and Mitigation of Station Blackout
ML12125A2632012-04-29029 April 2012
Comment (30) of William R. Harris on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1, for the Term April 1, 2030 Through March 31, 2050
ML12094A0952012-03-21021 March 2012
Comment (29) of Susan Kepner Opposing NextEra Energy Resources LLC for Licensing from 2030-2050 of the Seabrook Power Plant in Seabrook, Nh
ML12083A0562012-03-12012 March 2012
Comment (28) of Donald Tilbury Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML11304A0592011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (17) of Timothy Timmerman, on Behalf of H. Curtis Spalding, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear P
ML11304A2432011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (16) of Mary Lampert, Raymond Shadis, & David Agnew, on Seabrook NUREG-1437, Supplement 46, Section 5.0 - October 26, 2011
ML11304A0552011-10-26026 October 2011
Comments (21) of William R. Harris & Thomas S. Popik, on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies, on NRC-2010-0206, Seabrook Station License Renewal for March 2030-March 2050
ML11304A0582011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (18) of Kelvin Allen Brooks on Behalf of Nh Dept of Justice, Office of the Attorney General on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0542011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (22) of Steven Athearn on Behalf of Self on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0522011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (24) of Richard A. Knight on Behalf of Himself Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License for Another 20 Years
ML11304A0562011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (20) of Doug Bogen on Behalf of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0572011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (19) of Peter Colosi, on Behalf of National Marine Fisheries Service, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants & Public Meetings for License Ren
ML11301A0992011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (15) of Andrew Raddant, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, Notice of Availability of Draft 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Rene
ML11304A0532011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (23) of Robin D. Willits, on Deis of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire
ML11301A0742011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (13) of Timothy W. Drew, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Environmental Services, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement fo
ML11301A0752011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (14) of Ilse Andrews, on Behalf of Sapl on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License
ML11301A0732011-10-24024 October 2011
Comment (12) of Douglas E. Grout, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Marine Fisheries Division, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statemen
ML11300A0102011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (11) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for Li
ML11300A0092011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (10) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 496 to the Generic EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Renewal of Seabrook
ML11305A0112011-10-20020 October 2011
Comment (25) of Donald E. Tilbury, on Behalf of Himself, Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License
ML11308A0312011-10-20020 October 2011
Comment (27) of Filson and Shirley Glanz Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML11287A0382011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (9) of Mary Broderick, on Seabrook Station, Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Division of License Renewal, NRC-2010-0206
ML11266A1532011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (5) of Max Abramson, on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Division of License Renewal
ML11265A2202011-09-20020 September 2011
Comment (4) of Sandra Koski Re NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for the License Renewal of Se
ML11279A1192011-09-15015 September 2011
Comment (8) of William R. Harris on Environmental Risk Management & Mitigation Issues That Are Essential for NRC to Analyze in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Relicensing of Seabrook Station Unit 1
ML11257A0882011-09-0101 September 2011
Comment (2) of Brona Simon of State of Ma, Historical Commission on Seabrook Station License Renewal Application
ML11242A1112011-08-17017 August 2011
Comment (1) of Edna Feighner on Behalf of New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Seabrook Station License Renewal
ML1108005362011-03-18018 March 2011
Comment (7) of Larry Nicholson, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary, Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages.
ML1026603312010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (7) of Andrew R. Port on Behalf of City of Newburyport Office of Planning & Development on Environmental Scoping Review Regarding Application for an Operating License Extension for Seabrook, Unit 1 from Year 2030 to Year 2050
ML1026403712010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (6) of Joyce Kemp, Opposing NRC-2010-0206-0002, Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, Etc.: Nextera Energy Seabrook; Seabrook Station (Unit 1)
ML1026504862010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (6) of Joseph W. Fahey on Behalf of Amesbury on Environmental Impact & Mitigation Scoping for Relicensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML1024505252010-09-0101 September 2010
Comment (4) of Geordie Vining on Behalf of Himself Opposing Relicensing Seabrook Plant for the Years 2030-2050
ML1024200432010-08-25025 August 2010
Comment (3) of William Harris, Additional Reference Document for Seabrook Relicensing Environmental Review - Threat Assessment of Emp for Critical Infrastructure
ML1025002712010-08-23023 August 2010
Comment (2) of William R. Harris, on Behalf of Self, on Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Application for Renewal of License for Seabrook
ML1024200372010-08-19019 August 2010
Comment (1) of Maggie Hassan on Behalf of Constituents Different Opinion on the Relicensing of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant
ML0931002132009-10-19019 October 2009
Comment (8) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on NRC-2008-0122 Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations, Proposed Rule
ML0919003682009-07-0101 July 2009
Comment (1) of David Egonis on Behalf of NextEra Energy Seabrook Station on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222
ML0319704012003-07-14014 July 2003
Comment (6) by R.S. Kundalkar Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Requirements for Steam Generator Tube Inspection - 68 Fr 25909
2017-02-22
[Table view] |
Text
S.
RULES i RULSriVES NextEra Energy Resources LLC October 20, 201 700 Universe Blvd Juno Beach, FL 33408 C7 " _ 1V i ?: 2 1
ýýkl,;2011
Subject:
Seabrook N.H. Nuclear Power Plant
/_ýZj During the NRC/Seabrook Power Plant puicearing, I attended here in Hampton on Sept 15, I became awakened to what is happening in the nuclear power business. It led me to investigate it, the NRC, and your company. I can't believe nuclear is better for making electricity than other methods. In general, because it's dangerous, complicated, too costly, storage problems, monitoring requirements, etc. I believe I read that only a fraction of the heat generated is needed with the rest going into the atmosphere. If so then it is inefficient, At Seabrook, I understand there are aquatic problems as well. Cracks have been found and at this writing cooling pumps have caused a shut-down. I am concerned.
It is beyond my comprehension that nuclear was allowed to invade us here in the first place. Mostly because New Hampshire has a very small coastline as compared to our neighbors. Just about all 20 miles of it is sunny beach area's that attract thousands of summer tourists. It didn't make sense initially and still doesn't because the area exit roads are not adequate to evacuate the beaches and towns in the event of a serious problem at the plant (specially during the summer months-150,000 to 200,000). Today's area population is now 2 2 x what it was 20 years ago, so the problem is exacerbated. Also, the beach has nearly completed multi-million updating facilities and infrastructure, which will attract even more visitors in coming years. If you, the owner, and the NRC members haven't visited our beaches during a summer weekend, you should and try to envision an evacuation.
See if you can continue to ignore this impossibility.
- I see that NextEra is a leader in alternative energy sources--44% wind, for instance. Great! I hope you can keep your status. Perhaps one way would be for you to consider Seabrook an OPPORTUNITY. A chance for NextEra to show the world that they do care for people and their concern about preserving where they live--by retracting your request for re-licensing and start making plans for safe alternative retrofit.
,5t__
Regarding licensing, I also question why the NRC would even consider your request this far ahead (2030-2050). The public didn't want it back in the 60's, 70's, and 80's, as the history of it shows by the demonstrations and arrests made, yet it got built. It still is not wanted. This, now, becomes an OPPORTUNITY for the NRC, too, to show that they are concerned with the public and the communities affected here in the Seabrook area--by denying your request for re-license (should you continue to press for one).
Fukushima is in the news as well as it should be. It is a horrible situation. A more detailed description of the grim ongoings is written up in the October 17, 2011 issue of The NEW YORKER magazine. Something like that could happen in Seabrook, whereas it also built on a fault line, whether you want to believe or not. IF it did, our whole area would be similarly destroyed. We don't want to gamble any longer than we have to. Alternative methods are already available and others are being developed. Wind is a consideration but perhaps something tidal. I/we ask that you make change!
What can one man do by writing a letter? I'll have to wait and see. I could get 1000 signatures easily, if I want and will if it would help my effort? I would like a personal response, please--not just a form letter. Thank you!!
Respectfully, Donald Tilbury 603-926-6804 15 Bride Hill Drive tilburydonald@comcast.net Hampton, N H 03842 Cc: NRC
r SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (LICENSE TO OPERATE FROM 2030 TO 2050) Wha???
NRC (SAYS NO PROBLEM)
Except for:
Possible earthquake*
(Plant built on fault line)
Impossible evacuation Plan" (Area population much greater now.
Over-storage of spent fuel rods already . -
(Now what?)
Plant near end of age it was designed for (Structural problems found. Why gamble longer?)
Aquatic problems already (From reactor ocean cooling water)
- Earthquake: In this regard we've been lucky for 20 years. We were forced to accept the plant initially. Now they want to force us again to be subjected to this very real possibility for many more tense years?
- Evacuation: Everyone who lives in this area knows it would impossible to evacuate 100,000 to 200,000 beach-goers and residents just from the beach on summertime weekends.
I feel nuclear has been tried, but it is too costly, complex, and dangerous to continue, especially here in this heavy tourist area. It's time close the plant or at least convert it to a SAFE option for making electricity.
Don Tilbury Hampton, NH
