|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML17059D1202017-02-22022 February 2017
Comment (1) of Kat Mcghee on Seabrook Power Plant
ML14171A4052014-06-17017 June 2014
Comment (6) of James M. Petro, on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary 2014-XX, Tornado Missile Protection.
ML13190A0112013-06-30030 June 2013
Comment(1) of William R. Harris on Behalf of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on the 2nd Supp Environmental Impact Statement for Seabrook Station No. Unit 1
ML13189A1282013-06-28028 June 2013
Comment (2) of Timothy Timmermann on Behalf of Environmental Protection Agency on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 46 Regarding Seabrook
ML13207A1062013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (137) of Timothy W. Drew on Behalf of State of Nw, Dept. of Environmental Services, on Supplemental Environmental Impacts Statement -NH Des
ML13190A0082013-05-31031 May 2013
Comment (32) of Douglas E. Grout on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish and Game Department on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12132A1332012-05-0707 May 2012
Comment (31) of William R. Harris of the Foundation for Resilient Societies on Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Relating to the Prevention and Mitigation of Station Blackout
ML12125A2632012-04-29029 April 2012
Comment (30) of William R. Harris on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies on Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Relicensing of Seabrook, Unit 1, for the Term April 1, 2030 Through March 31, 2050
ML12094A0952012-03-21021 March 2012
Comment (29) of Susan Kepner Opposing NextEra Energy Resources LLC for Licensing from 2030-2050 of the Seabrook Power Plant in Seabrook, Nh
ML12083A0562012-03-12012 March 2012
Comment (28) of Donald Tilbury Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML11304A0592011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (17) of Timothy Timmerman, on Behalf of H. Curtis Spalding, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear P
ML11304A2432011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (16) of Mary Lampert, Raymond Shadis, & David Agnew, on Seabrook NUREG-1437, Supplement 46, Section 5.0 - October 26, 2011
ML11304A0552011-10-26026 October 2011
Comments (21) of William R. Harris & Thomas S. Popik, on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Societies, on NRC-2010-0206, Seabrook Station License Renewal for March 2030-March 2050
ML11304A0582011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (18) of Kelvin Allen Brooks on Behalf of Nh Dept of Justice, Office of the Attorney General on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0542011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (22) of Steven Athearn on Behalf of Self on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0522011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (24) of Richard A. Knight on Behalf of Himself Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License for Another 20 Years
ML11304A0562011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (20) of Doug Bogen on Behalf of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1
ML11304A0572011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (19) of Peter Colosi, on Behalf of National Marine Fisheries Service, on Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants & Public Meetings for License Ren
ML11301A0992011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (15) of Andrew Raddant, on Behalf of Us Dept of Interior, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, Notice of Availability of Draft 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Rene
ML11304A0532011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (23) of Robin D. Willits, on Deis of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire
ML11301A0742011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (13) of Timothy W. Drew, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Environmental Services, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement fo
ML11301A0752011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (14) of Ilse Andrews, on Behalf of Sapl on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License
ML11301A0732011-10-24024 October 2011
Comment (12) of Douglas E. Grout, on Behalf of New Hampshire Fish & Game, Marine Fisheries Division, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to Generic Environmental Impact Statemen
ML11300A0102011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (11) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for Li
ML11300A0092011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (10) of Randall Kezar, on NRC-2010-0206-0013, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 496 to the Generic EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for License Renewal of Seabrook
ML11305A0112011-10-20020 October 2011
Comment (25) of Donald E. Tilbury, on Behalf of Himself, Opposing the Extension of Seabrook Operating License
ML11308A0312011-10-20020 October 2011
Comment (27) of Filson and Shirley Glanz Opposing the Re-Licensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML11287A0382011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (9) of Mary Broderick, on Seabrook Station, Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Division of License Renewal, NRC-2010-0206
ML11266A1532011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (5) of Max Abramson, on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Division of License Renewal
ML11265A2202011-09-20020 September 2011
Comment (4) of Sandra Koski Re NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 46 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meetings for the License Renewal of Se
ML11279A1192011-09-15015 September 2011
Comment (8) of William R. Harris on Environmental Risk Management & Mitigation Issues That Are Essential for NRC to Analyze in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Relicensing of Seabrook Station Unit 1
ML11257A0882011-09-0101 September 2011
Comment (2) of Brona Simon of State of Ma, Historical Commission on Seabrook Station License Renewal Application
ML11242A1112011-08-17017 August 2011
Comment (1) of Edna Feighner on Behalf of New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Seabrook Station License Renewal
ML1108005362011-03-18018 March 2011
Comment (7) of Larry Nicholson, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary, Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages.
ML1026603312010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (7) of Andrew R. Port on Behalf of City of Newburyport Office of Planning & Development on Environmental Scoping Review Regarding Application for an Operating License Extension for Seabrook, Unit 1 from Year 2030 to Year 2050
ML1026403712010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (6) of Joyce Kemp, Opposing NRC-2010-0206-0002, Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, Etc.: Nextera Energy Seabrook; Seabrook Station (Unit 1)
ML1026504862010-09-20020 September 2010
Comment (6) of Joseph W. Fahey on Behalf of Amesbury on Environmental Impact & Mitigation Scoping for Relicensing of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant
ML1024505252010-09-0101 September 2010
Comment (4) of Geordie Vining on Behalf of Himself Opposing Relicensing Seabrook Plant for the Years 2030-2050
ML1024200432010-08-25025 August 2010
Comment (3) of William Harris, Additional Reference Document for Seabrook Relicensing Environmental Review - Threat Assessment of Emp for Critical Infrastructure
ML1025002712010-08-23023 August 2010
Comment (2) of William R. Harris, on Behalf of Self, on Nextera Energy Seabrook, LLC Application for Renewal of License for Seabrook
ML1024200372010-08-19019 August 2010
Comment (1) of Maggie Hassan on Behalf of Constituents Different Opinion on the Relicensing of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant
ML0931002132009-10-19019 October 2009
Comment (8) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Company, on NRC-2008-0122 Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations, Proposed Rule
ML0919003682009-07-0101 July 2009
Comment (1) of David Egonis on Behalf of NextEra Energy Seabrook Station on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222
ML0319704012003-07-14014 July 2003
Comment (6) by R.S. Kundalkar Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Requirements for Steam Generator Tube Inspection - 68 Fr 25909
2017-02-22
[Table view] |
Text
Gallagher, Carol From: Sent: To: Kathy McGhee <kmcghee257@g'mail.com>
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:33 PM Gallagher, Carol
Subject:
Attachments:
[External_Sender]
Public Comment on Docket NRC 2017-0003 Seabrook Power Station Untitled.docx
\ I recently heard about the open period for public comment on NH Pubic Radio. It was very difficult to find out 'how' to make a public comment -so perhaps that is something that could be remedied in the future when you are asking the public to reach you.
Dear Ms. Gallagher,
_; Attached please find my public comment on Docket# NRC 2017-0003.
Please let me know that this has reached you and will be posted to the record. Thank you, Kat McGhee c:i/7 fa;.7_ (
71,0/ '(!) r----------------1:__
____ --SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 ,
/{dbe4/;;
.;(_., Wte3) 1 r JJ --i ; *-, ., I _; .. ..... "'-.'.: -'* ....... --i I i
-*-**1 . I ... _ .. / i'-J * .t:::.: :D c r--' c ... ' r --
&'. ,,, I RE: Docket #NRC2017-0003 February 22, 2017
Dear Ms. Gallagher,
My husband and I are New Hampshire residents and I have lived in New England my entire life. Since our marriage, I have learned a great deal about nuclear energy from my husband, Dr. John McGhee, who is a nuclear engineer.
John worked for Los Alamos National Labs in New Mexico for 15 years, before spinning off his own company in the field of radiation transport numerical modeling software.
That project ended up focused primarily on nuclear medicine, but suffice to say, he has vast expertise regarding nuclear energy. Though John does not work in power plants,his extensive knowledge in the field, combined with our shared concern for the energy decisions being made in the US and around the yvorld prompt me to write in favor of the NRC's relicensing of this work-horse that benefits our region. Seabrook has met it promised goals in providing the regional grid with 1300 MWe's of clean, reliable base load year after year since its inception.
When does a call for mainten.ance become a fitting excuse for pulling the plug on a project of such significance and long term investment?
Only when hysteria is allowed to trump logic. The benefits far outweigh any risk posed by the minor flaws of an aging infrastructure.
If we had no plan to maintain this plant, we should not have undertaken the original endeavor.
Seabrook played another critical role in that it provides us with a line of defense against a predatory gas industry seeking to monopolize the regional energy markets. Increasing our gas reliance beyond the 52% it holds today, means reversing our 'diverse energy portfolio' and undoing efforts to reduce reliance on fossil fuels into the future. Its not simplylurning off a power plant that can easily be replaced.
Its putting an end to an era that was designed to push us in a new
-that is tightly entwined with our children's well-being and the health of the planet. Not to mention the sunk-cost that was also made, to gain us a brighter, emissions-free future. The reported problem with the cement at the power plant is both manageable and threatening according to the engineering reviews. Relicensing Seabrook would certainly present lower risk to our economy and our clean energy portfolio than not relicensing it. As long as adequate plans are in place to address ongoing maintenance of the cement housings and walls, we are very much in,favor of continuing our support of Seabrook.
For the reasons stated above and because the original concern over global warming that prompted our investment in Seabrook has not been addressed, I write in favor of re-licensure.
\ Thank you for your consideration iri posting this comment as part of Docket NRC. 2017-0003:
Regards, Kathy McGhee, M.Ed, PMP Hollis, NH 03049 '
