ML18157A371

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:03, 28 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (054) from Joel Goldstein on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A371
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/2018
From: Goldstein J
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
83FR12504 00054, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18157A371 (1)


Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 3:55 PM Received:

June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1k2-93ju-qdpg Comments Due:

June 05, 2018

Submission Type:

WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:

NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:

NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0057 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Joel Goldstein General Comment The present SONGS storage plan is too dangerous to be permitted to conti nue. The containers are too thin and only guaranteed for 20 years. The site is too close to th e ocean and too close to sea-level. There is an eart hquake fault in the immediate area. The proposal to move the storage site to one across the I-5 freeway and to much higher, dryer ground makes sense. The government already owns the land

. Do not gamble with the safe ty of 8.5 million people in Southern California. Do not enda nger our Marine base and Navy facilities in proximity to the present site; this is thus a matter of National security. Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fd ms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483341716&format=xml&showorig=false