ML18158A276
| ML18158A276 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2018 |
| From: | Dowden D - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY/RAS | |
| References | |
| 83FR12504 00070, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8 | |
| Download: ML18158A276 (2) | |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/6/18 8:59 AM Received: June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93k1-1ybs Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Comment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0071 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Daniel Dowden Address:
25341 Via De Anza Laguan Niguel, CA, 92677 Email: danieldowden@gmail.com Submitter's Representative: no third party Organization: no third party General Comment See attached file(s)
Attachments San Onofre Page 1 of 1 06/06/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483343d64&format=xml&showorig=false 70 PRM-72-8 83 FR 12504
Storing nuclear waste next to a water source such as a large river risks spreading leaking radiation widely through the river and water table.
More on point for San Onofre, storing nuclear waste at or near San Onofre, next to the Pacific Ocean (the largest in the world) and a large human population within 50 miles is INSANELY dangerous and irresponsible.
Don't get me started on the earthquake faults under and very near the storage location at San Onofre.
Altogether, perhaps it would be more concise of me to sum it up by saying it would be a criminal act to set so many people up for the harm San Onofre's Fukushima's event will bring us.