ML13352A517
| ML13352A517 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2013 |
| From: | Higgins K - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 78FR56775 00461, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51 | |
| Download: ML13352A517 (3) | |
Text
1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From:
RulemakingComments Resource Sent:
Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:13 PM To:
Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc:
RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:
0904 higgins.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRCOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/15/13 TITLE: Waste ConfidenceContinued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00461
Hearing Identifier:
Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number:
485 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433AE4764)
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date:
12/18/2013 3:13:03 PM Received Date:
12/18/2013 3:13:04 PM From:
RulemakingComments Resource Created By:
RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients:
"RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/18/2013 3:13:04 PM 0904 higgins.pdf 78996 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On: NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document: NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-0904 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: kevin higgins Address: United States, General Comment Why is it that we as citizens are told by fastfood resturants that cetain fats are not healthy for us? Because they are bad for us. If there are guidelines for fastfood resturants then why is there no regulations for Nuclear Power stations? They release radiation into the air each month "Batch releases" yet the general public has no idea on how much radiations is being released. Why? We should know how radiation affects us as citizens. We should have monthly reports on the radiations levels being released each month this is especially true for individuals such as myself who live directly down wind from a nuclear facitily. How is it possible that San Onofre powe station will be used for a nuclear waste dump when we dont even know how much radiation was being released when it was fully operational? Please understand that I started a facebook page in which there are high levels of deseases in the Riverside county areas especially Temecula, Fallbrook, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore Etc... These areas are directly 22 miles away from San Onofre power station. Hopefully a billion dollar industry would protect the citizens over profits, but let's face the facts Southern California Edison fired Gregory Jaczko for telling the truth. He stated that to build a 25 billion dollar nuclear power station, does protect a 300 billion accident. It's obvious the nuclear industry protects the nuclear industry and can give a shit about human safety. Thanks Kevin Higgins PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 17, 2013 Received: December 15, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1jx-89bb-uu4k Comments Due: December 20, 2013 Submission Type: Web Page 1 of 1 12/17/2013 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000064814c138d&am...