ML14001A057

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (00786) of Alan Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A057
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/2013
From: Korsen A
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
78FR56775 00786, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51
Download: ML14001A057 (3)


Text

1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:34 PM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc: RulemakingComments Resource

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:

1180 korsen.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/20/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00786

Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 812 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433C4A1A5)

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 12/26/2013 4:33:37 PM Received Date: 12/26/2013 4:33:37 PM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/26/2013 4:33:37 PM 1180 korsen.pdf 78682 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:

NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:

NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1180 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Alan Korsen Address: 245 Calle Familia San Clemente, CA, 92672 Email: akorsen@cox.net General Comment My family and I have lived in San Clemente next to SONGS since 1976. I was a Councilman when the plant was licensed and have spoken publicly at many FEMA hearings about the impossibility of evacuating the population of San Clemente and the surrounding communities within the 10 mile radius and it is unbelievable to think of evacuating a 50 mile radius as was requested after the Fukushima disaster. We have a unique geographical problem with limited egresses and no way out for a population of over 8 million people. We must have a separate EIR.

Since the evacuation plan for SONGS was erroneously approved by FEMA in the early 1980's until today no new evacuation routes have been made available, no plan to adequately evacuate the students has been formulated, a major railroad line and highway that links two major cities of Los Angeles and San Diego still run immediately adjacent to the plant. The plant is still in an earthquake zone and stands on a bluff that is susceptible to Tsunamis. Lastly, the repository for the spent fuel has never approved and it appears as though it never will be. The waste should be transferred to dry cask storage and moved away from this heavily populated

area to a location away from the coast ASAP.

Please don't allow this Southern California coastal community to live with the thread of a nuclear disaster a day lon g er than absolutel y necessar y. PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 20, 2013 Received:

December 20, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1jx-89e9-7ljd Comments Due:

December 20, 2013 Submission Type:

Web Pa ge 1of 1 12/20/2013 htt ps://www.fdms.

g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814cd964&am

...