|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2018-0017, Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel2018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2772018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (060) from Marion Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2762018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (070) from Daniel Dowden on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2702018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (064) from Mary Jo Poole on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3792018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3782018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (052) from Carmela Price on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3742018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (057) from Arturo Torres on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3732018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (056) from Irwin Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3722018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (055) from Paula Colby on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3712018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (054) from Joel Goldstein on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3622018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (049) from Scott Chamberlin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3572018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (044) from Sheryl Arruda on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2792018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (062) from Jonathan Adler on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3682018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (042) of Jo Panitch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3672018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (041) of Anne Clorite on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3662018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (040) from Susan and David Dearing on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3652018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (039) of Berton Moldow on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3642018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (038) of Laura Lynch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3562018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (043) of Mary Steele on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A2992018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (034) from an Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3002018-05-31031 May 2018
Comment (033) from Patricia Borchmann on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18150A6392018-05-29029 May 2018
Comment (029) from Donna Shanske on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18149A6012018-05-25025 May 2018
Comment (019) from Cord Bauer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18094A7852018-04-0303 April 2018
Comment (003) from Ken Berg on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18094A7732018-04-0202 April 2018
Comment (002) from Ron Rodarte on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18100A3522018-04-0202 April 2018
Comment (012) of Steve Schlesinger on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML16082A0072016-03-18018 March 2016
Comment (112) of Charles R. Langley on Behalf of Public Watchdogs on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16060A5112016-02-29029 February 2016
Comment (043) of Sara Kaminske on Behalf of Orange County, CA on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16053A4532016-02-0101 February 2016
Comment (036) of Ron Roberts and Dianne Jacob on Behalf of the County of San Diego, CA, Board of Supervisors on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML13360A3582013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00685) of Ray Lutz on Behalf of Citizens Oversight, Inc. on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14007A0332013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00868) of Patricia Holloway on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A4422013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00845) of G. Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A4382013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00841) of Bruce Lieberman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A3782013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00835) of Yoko Collin on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0572013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00786) of Alan Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0052013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00736) of Valerie Burchfield Rhodes on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13365A3372013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00717) of Laurenn Barker on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4162013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00632) of Christina Imhoof on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14002A0042013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00801) of Jim Powers on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14002A0002013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00797) of Kevin Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0372013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00766) of Ed Maher on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0362013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00765) of Juniel Worthington on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0252013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00754) of Margaret Kuchnia on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13357A8322013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00601) of Roger Johnson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13359A0022013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00648) of Grace Van Thillo on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4262013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00639) of Kim Stanick on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4252013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00647) of Stephanie Jennings on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A3512013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00615) of John Dolegowski on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13352A5172013-12-15015 December 2013
Comment (00461) of Kevin Higgins on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A5512013-11-18018 November 2013
Comment (00269) of Bill Hannaman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
2018-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 3:55 PM Received:
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1k2-93ju-qdpg Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
Submission Type:
Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0057 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Joel Goldstein General Comment The present SONGS storage plan is too dangerous to be permitted to conti nue. The containers are too thin and only guaranteed for 20 years. The site is too close to th e ocean and too close to sea-level. There is an eart hquake fault in the immediate area. The proposal to move the storage site to one across the I-5 freeway and to much higher, dryer ground makes sense. The government already owns the land. Do not gamble with the safe ty of 8.5 million people in Southern California. Do not enda nger our Marine base and Navy facilities in proximity to the present site; this is thus a matter of National security. Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fd ms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483341716&format=xml&showorig=false
