ML13358A425

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (00647) of Stephanie Jennings on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A425
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/19/2013
From: Jennings S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
78FR56775 00647, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51
Download: ML13358A425 (3)


Text

1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From:

RulemakingComments Resource Sent:

Tuesday, December 24, 2013 9:46 AM To:

Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc:

RulemakingComments Resource

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:

1129 jennings.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRCOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/19/13 TITLE: Waste ConfidenceContinued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00647

Hearing Identifier:

Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number:

666 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433C49FE0)

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date:

12/24/2013 9:46:07 AM Received Date:

12/24/2013 9:46:07 AM From:

RulemakingComments Resource Created By:

RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients:

"RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/24/2013 9:46:07 AM 1129 jennings.pdf 77212 Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On: NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document: NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1129 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Stephanie Jennings Address:

2244 29th st san diego, CA, 92104 Email: stjennings@ucsd.edu General Comment No fukishima's in southern california! We DO NOT want the nuclear waste of san onofre stored on site! It is the worst possible place to store radiation. On a fault line and at the oceans edge. You are public servants & need to put the publics safety first. Costs to industry pale in comparison to costs of a nuclear accident in the backyard of 8 million people. I don't care if the industry goes bankrupt. Though this would be an economic crisis it pales in comparison to the humanitarian crisis that would rest on your shoulders! Have some guts!

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 20, 2013 Received: December 19, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1jx-89dv-qy50 Comments Due: December 20, 2013 Submission Type: Web Page 1 of 1 12/20/2013 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000064814cc27f&am...