ML14006A378

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (00835) of Yoko Collin on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A378
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/2013
From: Collin Y
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
78FR56775 00835, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51
Download: ML14006A378 (3)


Text

1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:04 PM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc: RulemakingComments Resource

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:

1246 collin.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/20/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00835

Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 871 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014435D730AA)

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 1/6/2014 2:04:21 PM Received Date: 1/6/2014 2:04:22 PM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 1/6/2014 2:04:22 PM 1246 collin.pdf 76783 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:

NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:

NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1246 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Yoko Collin General Comment I'd like to express my opinion about spent fuel storage at San Onofre Nuclear Generating station.

We shouldn't storage high radioactive spent fuels at San Onofre Nuclear Generating station. It is within such high density populated areas in Southern California. Also, it's within Tsunami zone and San Andreal fault near by. California is a earthquake state.

I've seen what happened at reactor #4 at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant where had spent fuel cooling pool and the building had exploded 2 years and 9 months ago. We, public know about its danger, even just storing high radioactive nuclear fuels. We can't take a chance. We need to remove the spent fuels from the SONGS as soon as possible. We can't wait 20 or more years to remove them. Spent fuel storage is our nation's big problem and have to put all the wisdom together to find the best solution possible.

NRC has to work hard for its duty of protecting people, but not prioritize big corporation's gain.

So, I'll ask each of NRC staff people to work its noble mission hard and put priority first on public safety.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: January 02, 2014 Received:

December 20, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1jx-89em-vm67 Comments Due:

December 20, 2013 Submission Type:

Web Pa ge 1of 1 01/02/2014 htt ps://www.fdms.

g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814d046a&am

...