|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2018-0017, Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel2018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2772018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (060) from Marion Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2762018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (070) from Daniel Dowden on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2702018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (064) from Mary Jo Poole on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3792018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3782018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (052) from Carmela Price on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3742018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (057) from Arturo Torres on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3732018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (056) from Irwin Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3722018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (055) from Paula Colby on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3712018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (054) from Joel Goldstein on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3622018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (049) from Scott Chamberlin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3572018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (044) from Sheryl Arruda on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2792018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (062) from Jonathan Adler on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3682018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (042) of Jo Panitch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3672018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (041) of Anne Clorite on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3662018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (040) from Susan and David Dearing on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3652018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (039) of Berton Moldow on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3642018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (038) of Laura Lynch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3562018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (043) of Mary Steele on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A2992018-06-0101 June 2018 Comment (034) from an Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3002018-05-31031 May 2018 Comment (033) from Patricia Borchmann on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18150A6392018-05-29029 May 2018 Comment (029) from Donna Shanske on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18149A6012018-05-25025 May 2018 Comment (019) from Cord Bauer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18094A7852018-04-0303 April 2018 Comment (003) from Ken Berg on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18094A7732018-04-0202 April 2018 Comment (002) from Ron Rodarte on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18100A3522018-04-0202 April 2018 Comment (012) of Steve Schlesinger on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML16082A0072016-03-18018 March 2016 Comment (112) of Charles R. Langley on Behalf of Public Watchdogs on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16060A5112016-02-29029 February 2016 Comment (043) of Sara Kaminske on Behalf of Orange County, CA on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16053A4532016-02-0101 February 2016 Comment (036) of Ron Roberts and Dianne Jacob on Behalf of the County of San Diego, CA, Board of Supervisors on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML13360A3582013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00685) of Ray Lutz on Behalf of Citizens Oversight, Inc. on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14007A0332013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00868) of Patricia Holloway on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A4422013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00845) of G. Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A4382013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00841) of Bruce Lieberman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A3782013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00835) of Yoko Collin on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0572013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00786) of Alan Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0052013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00736) of Valerie Burchfield Rhodes on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13365A3372013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00717) of Laurenn Barker on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4162013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00632) of Christina Imhoof on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14002A0042013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00801) of Jim Powers on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14002A0002013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00797) of Kevin Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0372013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00766) of Ed Maher on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0362013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00765) of Juniel Worthington on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0252013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00754) of Margaret Kuchnia on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13357A8322013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00601) of Roger Johnson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13359A0022013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00648) of Grace Van Thillo on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4262013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00639) of Kim Stanick on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4252013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00647) of Stephanie Jennings on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A3512013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00615) of John Dolegowski on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13352A5172013-12-15015 December 2013 Comment (00461) of Kevin Higgins on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13336A5512013-11-18018 November 2013 Comment (00269) of Bill Hannaman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel 2018-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 3:43 PM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc: RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:
1277 holloway.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/20/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00868
Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 904 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014435D73180)
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 1/6/2014 3:42:59 PM Received Date: 1/6/2014 3:43:55 PM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 1/6/2014 3:43:55 PM 1277 holloway.pdf 80817 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:
NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:
NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1277 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Patricia Holloway Address: 62 Via Santa Maria San Clemente, CA, 92672 Email: pat13holloway@gmail.com General Comment December 20, 2013 To the NRC:
My family lives in San Clemente, California, approximately 6 miles from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. I am writing to thank you for shutting down the nuclear plant, and to implore you to move the tons of radioactive waste accumulating on site to a safer location far from population centers.
In the 40 years since SONGS has been operating, the number of people living within 50 miles of the plant has grown exponentially representing one of the most populous areas in the state. This includes 65,000 residents now living in San Clemente within 10 miles of San Onofre. Since 9-11 Americans are acutely aware of the ongoing threat of a terrorist attack on a facility like this, and all southern Californians know that a major earthquake in our region is long overdue. The disaster at Fukushima is yet another reminder of our vulnerability to earthquakes, tsunamis, and circumstances beyond human control.
When I learned this past year that nuclear waste at San Onofre is being cooled in pools and then stored in casks indefinitely on site I couldnt believe it. Given the dangerous nature of the fuel and the above mentioned risks, how can this be tolerated?
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: January 02, 2014 Received:
December 20, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1jx-89ep-6sxu Comments Due:
December 20, 2013 Submission Type:
Web Pa ge 1of 2 01/02/2014 htt ps://www.fdms.
g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814d0b40&am
...
The NRC and the federal government must take immediate steps to address this hazardous situation and move all radioactive material to a remote location as soon as it is safe to do so. This has to become the top priority and primary mission of the NRC.
The problem of safely storing nuclear waste for hundreds if not thousands of years may never be solved. Yet until that day comes, no more nuclear plants should be built in this country. The economic, social, and environmental costs are far too hi g h, especiall y now that safer technolo gies for g eneratin g power are available.
Pa ge 2of 2 01/02/2014 htt ps://www.fdms.
g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814d0b40&am
...