ML13358A416
| ML13358A416 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/19/2013 |
| From: | Imhoof C - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 78FR56775 00632, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51 | |
| Download: ML13358A416 (3) | |
Text
1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From:
RulemakingComments Resource Sent:
Tuesday, December 24, 2013 8:41 AM To:
Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc:
RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:
1127 imhoof.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRCOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/19/13 TITLE: Waste ConfidenceContinued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00632
Hearing Identifier:
Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number:
657 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433C49F9E)
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date:
12/24/2013 8:40:35 AM Received Date:
12/24/2013 8:40:35 AM From:
RulemakingComments Resource Created By:
RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients:
"RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/24/2013 8:40:35 AM 1127 imhoof.pdf 79092 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On: NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document: NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1127 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Christina Imhoof Address:
6271 Lakewood Street San Diego, CA, 92122 Email: cimhoof@msn.com General Comment
Dear NRC:
your proposed decision with regard to storage of nuclear waste at San Onofre shows that you are not being professional or competent in your duties! Your sworn duty is to protect the public, not to rubber-stamp the industry agenda. If you're only going to rubber-stamp, then why are you in this job? --- Protecting the public means conducting a professional analysis of the individual site conditions and determining satety in light of hazards such as the possibility of earthquakes, potential dangers to populations in the area, to public transportation close to the facility, and other factors. You are supposed to do your due diligence in this regard, and I am appalled that you have not done so! Be prepared for lots of legal actions against you! We do not want you to jeapardize our children's future! DO YOUR JOB!
Very Sincerely, Christina Imhoof PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 20, 2013 Received: December 19, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1jx-89dv-ivqc Comments Due: December 20, 2013 Submission Type: Web Page 1 of 1 12/20/2013 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000064814cc2fd&am...