ML18158A276

Comment (070) from Daniel Dowden on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

ML18158A276
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	06/05/2018
From:	Dowden D - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY/RAS
References
83FR12504 00070, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8
Download: ML18158A276 (2)

Text

PUBLIC SUBMISSIONAs of: 6/6/18 8:59 AMReceived: June 05, 2018Status: Pending_PostTracking No. 1k2-93k1-1ybsComments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelDocument: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0071Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776Submitter InformationName: Daniel DowdenAddress: 25341 Via De AnzaLaguan Niguel, CA, 92677Email: danieldowden@gmail.comSubmitter's Representative: no third party Organization: no third partyGeneral CommentSee attached file(s)AttachmentsSan OnofrePage 1 of 106/06/2018https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483343d64&format=xml&showorig=false Storing nuclear waste next to a water source such as a large river risks spreading leaking radiation widely through the river and water table. More on point for San Onofre, storing nuclear waste at or near San Onofre, next to the Pacific Ocean (the largest in the world) and a large human population within 50 miles is INSANELY dangerous and irresponsible. Don't get me started on the earthquake faults under and very near the storage location at San Onofre. Altogether, perhaps it would be more concise of me to sum it up by saying it would be a criminal act to set so many people up for the harm San Onofre's Fukushima's event will bring us.