ML15127A190

Oyster Creek - Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2014

ML15127A190
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	04/30/2015
From:	Dostal J P Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RA-1 5-034
Download: ML15127A190 (173)

Text

1N Exelon GenerationTechnical Specification 6.9.1 .eRA-1 5-034April 30, 2015U. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Document Control DeskWashington, DC 20555-0001Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating StationRenewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16NRC Docket No. 50-219

Subject:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report -2014Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report forcalendar year 2014 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. This submittal is madein accordance with Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specification6.9.1 .e, "Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report."If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact John Renda at609-971-2572.Sincerely,Plant Manager -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

Enclosure:

2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reportcc: Administrator, USNRC Region IUSNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster CreekUSNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster CreekCraig Stewart, American Nuclear Insurers Docket No: 50-219OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATIONUNIT IAnnual RadiologicalEnvironmental Operating Report1 January Through 31 December 2014Prepared ByTeledyne Brown EngineeringEnvironmental ServicesAw Exelon Generation.,Oyster Creek Generating StationForked River, NJ 08731April 2015 Table of ContentsI. Sum m ary and Conclusions .......................................................................................... 1II. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3A .O bjectives of the REM P .................................................................................. 3B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 4C. Discussion ..................................................................................................... 4III. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7A. Sam ple Collection ......................................................................................... 7B. Sam ple Analysis ............................................................................................ 9C .Data Interpretation ...................................................................................... 10D. Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11E. Program Changes ......................................................................................... 12IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 12A. Aquatic Environm ent ..................................................................................... 12B. Atm ospheric Environm ent ........................................................................... 17C. Am bient G am m a Radiation ......................................................................... 21D. Land Use Survey .......................................................................................... 22E. Summary of Results -Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 23V. References ................................................................................................................... 26V I. E rra ta ........................................................................................................................... 2 7i AppendicesAppendix ATablesTable A-1Appendix BTablesTable B-1Table B-2Table B-3FigquresFigure B-1Figure B-2Figure B-3Appendix CTablesTable C-1. 1Table C-1.2Table C-11.1Table C-1I.2Table C-11.3Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report SummaryRadiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary forthe Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection &Analytical MethodsLocation Designation and Identification System for the Oyster CreekGenerating StationRadiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations,Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Summary of SampleCollection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station,2014Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radius of the Oyster CreekGenerating Station.Locations of REMP Stations within a I to 5-mile radius of the OysterCreek Generating Station.Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 miles from the OysterCreek Generating Station.Data Tables and Figures -Primary LaboratoryConcentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gross Beta in Drinking Water Samples Collected inthe Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.ii Table C-I1.4Table C-111.1Table C-1II.2Table C-IV.1Table C-IV.2Table C-V. 1Table C-VI.1Table C-VI.2Table C-VI.3Table C-VI.4Table C-VII.1Table C-VIII.1Table C-IX. 1Table C-IX.2Table C-IX.3FiguresFigure C-1Figure C-2Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collectedin the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder(Fish) Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek GeneratingStation, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected inthe Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected inthe Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations in AirParticulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Strontium in Air Particulate Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinityof Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in VegetationSamples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station,2014.Quarterly OSLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Mean Quarterly OSLD Results for the Site Boundary, Intermediate,Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek GeneratingStation, 2014.Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 2014.Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Clams Oyster Creek GeneratingStation, 1983 -2014.Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 1984 -2014.iii Figure C-3Figure C-4Figure C-5Figure C-6Figure C-7Appendix DTablesTable D-1.1Table D-1.2Table D-11.1Table D-11.2Table D-11.3Table D-Ill.1Table D-Ill.2Table D-IV.1Table D-V.1Table D-VI.1Mean Cesium-1 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 1984 -2014.Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates OysterCreek Generating Station, 2008 -.2014.Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates OysterCreek Generating Station, 1984 -2014.Mean Quarterly OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station,2014.Mean Quarterly TLD/OSLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek GeneratingStation, 1990 -2014.Data Tables -QC LaboratoryConcentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in theVicinity Of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Drinking Water Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of 1-131 in Drinking Water Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Drinking Water SamplesCollected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collectedin the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in theVicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected inthe Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in VegetationSamples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station,2014.iv Appendix ETablesTable E-1Table E-2Table E-3Table E-4Table E-5Appendix FAppendix GInter-Laboratory Comparison ProgramAnalytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program TeledyneBrown Engineering, 2014ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program TeledyneBrown Engineering, 2014DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014ERA (a) Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing ProgramEnvironmental, Inc., 2014DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)Environmental, Inc., 2014Errata DataAnnual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report(ARGPPR)v

1. Summary and ConclusionsThis report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by Exelon Nuclearcovers the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. During that timeperiod, 1716 analyses were performed on 1248 samples. In assessing all thedata gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, itwas concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impacton the environment.REMP designated surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations oftritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium, fission or activation productswere detected in any of the surface water samples collected as part of theRadiological Environmental Monitoring Program during 2014.REMP designated drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations ofgross beta, tritium, 1-131, and gamma emitting nuclides. The preoperationalenvironmental monitoring program did not include analysis of drinking water forgross beta. No tritium, 1-131, or fission or activation products were detected inany of the drinking water samples collected.REMP designated groundwater samples were analyzed for concentrations oftritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No tritium and no fission or activationproducts were detected in REMP groundwater samples.Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples wereanalyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No OCGS-producedfission or activation products were detected in fish, clams or crabs. Cesium-137was not detected in any sediment samples.Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, gammaemitting nuclides, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90. Gross beta and cosmogenicBe-7 were detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years.No fission or activation products were detected. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. AllStrontium-89 and Strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectableactivity.High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. Allresults were less than the minimum detectable concentration.Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, Strontium-89,and Strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistentwith those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products weredetected. All Strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity.Strontium-90 activity was detected at levels consistent with those detected inprevious years at both control and indicator stations, and can be attributed tohistorical nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.1 Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly usingOptically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD). Exelon changed thedosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year 2012,Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use of Thermo LuminescentDosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons for this change. First, OSLDs arenot subject to "fade". Fade is where the dose on the dosimeter drifts lower overtime. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero afterthey are read. Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previousyears. The maximum dose to any member of the public attributable toradioactive effluents and direct radiation from the OCGS was less than the 25mrem/year limit established by the United Stated Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA).2 II. IntroductionThe Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling waterreactor owned and operated by Exelon, is located on the Atlantic Coastal PlainPhysiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south ofNewark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It liesapproximately 2 miles inland from the Barnegat Bay. The site, coveringapproximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesserextent, in Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passingthrough the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance ofthe property west of the highway. The station is about % mile west of thehighway and 1 / miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site propertyextends about 21/2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shorearea with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwatermarshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side ofthe site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side.A preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) forOCGS was established in 1966, and continued prior to the plant becomingoperational in 1969. This report covers those analyses performed by TeledyneBrown Engineering (TBE), Landauer and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) onsamples collected during the period 01 January 2014 through 31 December2014.A. Objectives of the REMPThe objectives of the REMP are to:1. Determine whether any significant increase occurs in theconcentration of radionuclides in major pathways.2. Identify and evaluate the buildup, if any, of radionuclides in thelocal environment, or any changes in normal background radiationlevels.3. Verify the adequacy of the plant's controls for the release ofradioactive materials.4. Fulfill the obligations of the radiological surveillance sections ofOyster Creek's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).3 B. Implementation of the ObjectivesThe implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:1 .Identifying significant exposure pathways.2. Establishing baseline radiological data for media within thosepathways.3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Stationoperation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man andthe environment.C. Discussion1 .General ProgramThe Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) wasestablished in 1966, before the plant became operational. Thispreoperational surveillance program was established to describeand quantify the radioactivity, and its variability, in the area prior tothe operation of OCGS. After OCGS became operational in 1969,the operational surveillance program continued to measureradiation and radioactivity in the surrounding areas.A variety of environmental samples are collected as part of theREMP at OCGS. The selection of sample types is based on theestablished pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through theenvironment to humans. The selection of sampling locations isbased on sample availability, local meteorological and hydrologicalcharacteristics, local population characteristics, and land usage inthe area of interest. The selection of sampling frequencies for thevarious environmental media is based on the radionuclides ofinterest, their respective half-lives, and their behavior in both thebiological and physical environment.2. Preoperational Surveillance ProgramThe federal government requires nuclear facilities to conductradiological environmental monitoring prior to constructing thefacility. This preoperational surveillance program is aimed atcollecting the data needed to identify pathways, including selectionof the radioisotope and sample media combinations to be includedin the environmental surveillance program conducted after facilityoperation begins. Radiochemical analyses performed on the4 environmental samples should include not only those nuclidesexpected to be released during facility operation, but should alsoinclude typical radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing andnatural background radioactivity. All environmental media with apotential to be affected by facility operation as well as those mediadirectly in the major pathways, should be sampled on at least anannual basis during the preoperational phase of the environmentalsurveillance program.The preoperational surveillance design, including nuclide/mediacombinations, sampling frequencies and locations, collectiontechniques, and radioanalyses performed, should be carefullyconsidered and incorporated in the design of the operationalsurveillance program. In this manner, data can be compared in avariety of ways (for example, from year to year, location to location,etc.) in order to detect any radiological impact the facility has on thesurrounding environment. Data collection during the preoperationalphase should be planned to provide a comprehensive database forevaluating any future changes in the environment surrounding thenuclear facility.OCGS began its preoperational environmental surveillanceprogram three years before the plant began operating in 1969.Data accumulated during those early years provide an extensivedatabase from which environmental monitoring personnel are ableto identify trends in the radiological characteristics of the localenvironment. The environmental surveillance program at OCGSwill continue after the plant has reached the end of its economicallyuseful life and decommissioning has begun.3. Consideration of Plant EffluentsEffluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity releasedto the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and doesnot exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operationof monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling andanalyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent andenvironmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects ofeffluent and environmental monitoring.Both radiological environmental and effluent monitoring indicatethat the operation of OCGS does not result in significant radiationexposure of the people or the environment surrounding OCGS andis well below the applicable levels set by the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) and the EPA.5 There were liquid radioactive effluent releases during 2014 ofconcentrations of tritium too low to detect at an LLD of 200picocuries per liter (pCi/L) at the New Jersey Pollution DischargeElimination System (NJPDES) permitted main condenser outfall.The releases were part of nearly continuous pumping ofgroundwater at approximately 70 gpm containing low levels oftritium and no detectable gamma. Exelon and the State of NewJersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) agreed tothis remediation action instead of natural attenuation to addressconcentrations of tritium in groundwater. Well 73 and supportingequipment and piping were installed to pump groundwater to theintake structure at the inlet of the main circulating water pumps.Provisions were established for both batch and continuousreleases of groundwater. Continuous releases occurredapproximately 230 days in 2014. The nearly continuous releasesoccurred from March 12, 2014 through December 31, 2014 with atotal of 2.31 E+07 gallons of groundwater pumped resulting in1.74E-01 Ci of tritium released to the discharge canal. The dose tothe most limiting member of the public due to the release ofgroundwater was 8.28E-07 mrem.Utilizing gaseous effluent data, the maximum hypothetical dose toany individual during 2014 was calculated using a mathematicalmodel, which is based on the methods defined by the U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission. These methods accurately determine thetypes and quantities of radioactive materials being released to theenvironment.The maximum calculated organ dose (Bone) from iodines, tritium,carbon-14 (C-14), and particulates to any individual due to gaseouseffluents was 4.78E-01 mrem, which was approximately 3.19E+00percent of the annual limit of 15 mrem. The maximum calculatedgamma air dose in the UNRESTRICTED AREA due to noble gaseffluents was 1.62E-02 mrad, which was 1.62E-01 percent of theannual 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, As Low As Reasonably Acheivable(ALARA) limit of 10mrad. The majority of organ dose from gaseouseffluents was due to C-14. The maximum hypothetical calculatedwhole body dose to any individual due to noble gas effluents was2.18E-03 mrem (0.00218 mrem) which was 4.36E-02 percent ofthe annual limit of 5 mrem.The total maximum organ dose (Bone) due to all radiologicaleffluents of 4.94E-01 mrem (0.494 mrem) received by anyindividual from gaseous effluents from the Oyster CreekGeneratingStation for the reporting period is more than 607 times lower than6 the dose the average individual in the Oyster Creek area during thesame time period. The background radiation dose averagesapproximately 300 mrem per year in the Central New Jersey area,which includes approximately 200 mrem/year from naturallyoccurring radon gas.During 2014, the maximum direct radiation dose to the most likelyexposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC potentially attributable to theoperation of Oyster Creek beyond the site boundary in the westsector, as shown by offsite OSLD readings at station 55 was 5.09mrem. The nearest member of the public is considered a part-timeresident that works 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> per year at a warehouse locatedwest of the plant.Environmental sampling of airborne iodine and particulates showedno radioactivity attributable to the operation of OCGS.Ill. Program DescriptionA. Sample CollectionSamples for the OCGS REMP were collected for Exelon by on-sitepersonnel and Normandeau Associates, Incorporated. This sectiondescribes the general collection methods used to obtain environmentalsamples for the OCGS REMP in 2014. Sample locations and descriptionscan be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-1, B-2, and B-3,Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.Aquatic EnvironmentThe aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiologicalanalyses on samples of surface water, drinking water, groundwater, fish,clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon water samples were collectedmonthly from two surface locations (33 and 94), semiannually at twosurface water locations (23 and 24), monthly from six drinking water wells(1 N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114) and quarterly from 2 groundwater stations(MW-24-3A and W-3C). Control locations were 94 and 37. All sampleswere collected in plastic bottles, which were rinsed at least twice withsource water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of twogroups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannually at threelocations (33, 93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected semiannuallyfrom three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)). Two annual crab sampleswere collected from two locations (33 and 93). Sediment samples werecollected at four locations semiannually (23, 24, 33, and 94 (control)).7 Atmospheric EnvironmentThe atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiologicalanalyses on samples of air particulate and airborne iodine. Airborneiodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed weekly ateight locations (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, 73, and 111). The control locationwas C. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at eachlocation, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filtersattached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rateof approximately one cubic foot per minute. The filters were replacedweekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.Terrestrial EnvironmentThe terrestrial environment was evaluated by performing radiologicalanalyses on samples of garden vegetation. No commercial dairyoperations and no dairy animals producing milk for human consumptionare located within a 5 mile radius of the plant. Therefore, vegetationsamples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples werecollected, when available, at four locations (35, 36, 66, and 115). Station36 was the control location. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" newunused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.Ambient Gamma RadiationDirect radiation measurements were made using A1203:C OpticallyStimulated Luminescence Dosimetry (OSLD). Exelon changed thedosimetry used for environmental monitoring. Beginning in calendar year2012, Exelon began using OSLDs and discontinued the use ofThermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD). There were two main reasons forthis change. First, OSLDs are not subject to "fade". Fade is where thedose on the dosimeter drifts lower over time. Second, OSLDs may be re-read if necessary. TLDs are reset to zero after they are read. The OSLDswere placed on and around the OCGS site and were categorized asfollows:An inner ring consisting of 19 locations (1, T1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57,58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 112, and 113) near the site boundary.An outer rinq consisting of 31 locations (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 22, 46, 47, 48, 68,73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106, 107, 109, and 110) extending to approximately 5miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-inpopulation.8 Special interest stations consisting of 9 locations (3, 11, 71, 72, 81, 88,89, 90, and 92) representing special interest areas such as populationcenters, state parks, etc.Background (Control) stations consisting of two locations (C and 14)greater than 20 miles distant from the site.Indicator OSLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station ineach of 16 meteorological compass sectors in the general area of the siteboundary. OSLDs were also placed in each meteorological sector in the1 to 5 mile range, where reasonable highway access would permit, inareas of public interest and population centers. Background locationswere located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS andgenerally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.Two OSLDs were placed at each location approximately three to eightfeet above ground level. The OSLDs were exchanged quarterly and sentto Landauer for analysis.B. Sample AnalysisThis section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBEand Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmentalsamples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2014. The analyticalprocedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes thefollowing analyses:1. Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates and drinkingwater.2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface, drinking water,groundwater, fish, clams, crabs, sediment, air particulates andvegetation.3. Concentrations of tritium in REMP designated surface, drinkingwater and groundwater.4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges and drinking water.5. Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.6. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the9 OCGS.C. Data InterpretationFor trending purposes, the radiological and direct radiation data collectedduring 2014 were compared with data from past years. The results ofenvironmental sampling show that radioactivity levels have not increasedfrom the background radioactivity detected prior to the operation ofOCGS. The operation of OCGS continues to have no measurableradiological impact upon the environment.Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable ConcentrationThe lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallestconcentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield anet count (above background) that would be detected with only a5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observationrepresents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the factestimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure andsample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presenceof activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the requiredOCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined abovewith the exception that the measurement is an after the factestimate of the presence of activity.2. Net Activity Calculation and Reportingq of ResultsNet activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting backgroundactivity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measuresextremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment,background variations may result in sample activity being lowerthan the background activity, which results in a negative number.An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was notdetected.Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample weregrouped as follows:For surface, drinking water, and groundwater -12 nuclides: Mn-54,Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137,Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.10 For fish -eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65,Cs-134, and Cs-1 37 were reported.For clams -eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60,Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.For crabs -eight nuclides: K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60,Zn-65, Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.For sediment -seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60,Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.For air particulate -six nuclides: Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60,Cs-1 34, and Cs-1 37 were reported.For air iodine cartridges -one nuclide: 1-131 was reported.For vegetation -seven nuclides: Be-7, K-40, 1-131, Cs-1 34,Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. Thestandard deviations represent the variability of measured results fordifferent samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.D. Program ExceptionsFor 2014 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.Exceptions are listed below:Drinking Water1. Station 39 (Lacey Twp., MUA Pump Station) was not collectedJanuary 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The station was offline for this time period.2. Station 1S -Offline January through August and the month ofDecember.3. Station 38 -Month of January was a composite for 3 of the 4weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 1/5.4. Station 1S -Month of September was a composite for 2 of the 4weeks. Well was out of service for the weeks of 9/7 and 9/14.11

5. Station 114 -Month of October was a composite for 4 of the 5weeks. Well was out of service for the week of 10/19.Dosimetry1. Week 16 (4/20/14 -4/26/14) -One of two dosimeters at Station 57was found on the ground. Both dosimeters at Station 68 werefound on the ground.2. Week 42 (10/19/14 -10/25/14) -One of the dosimeters at Station85 was missing. One of the dosimeters at Station 90 was found onthe ground.Air1. Week 10 (3/5/14 -3/12/14) -The fuse on the main breaker box atStation 20 failed and had to be replaced. Not enough samplevolume was collected to be considered a valid sample.2. Week 30 (7/23/14 -7/30/14) -The AP filter at Station 3 had a fewsmall holes in it. Suspect holes were due to a severe storm.3. Week 32 (8/6/14 -8/13/14) -The AP filter at Station 73 had a verysmall hole in it. Suspect hole was due to a severe storm.Program exceptions are tracked and investigated to understand thecauses of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors arereviewed with the personnel involved to prevent recurrence.The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriateprocedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable programimplementation.E. Program ChangesThere are no program changes for 2014.IV. Results and DiscussionA. Aquatic Environment1. Surface WaterSamples were taken via grab sample methodology at two locations(33 and 94) on a monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples were12 collected semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24). Of theselocations 23, 24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected byOyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses wereperformed:TritiumSamples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (TableC-1.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. Data fromthis year indicates that surface water tritium concentrations remainvery low and not significantly different from recent previous years.Gamma SpectrometrySamples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emittingnuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than theMDC.Surface water sampling began in 1966, and the samples wereanalyzed for tritium as well as other radioactivity. During thispreoperational program, tritium was detected at an averageconcentration of 1.05E+3 pCi/liter. At that time, countinginstrumentation was not as sensitive as it now, and the minimumdetectable concentration was 1 E+3 pCi/liter versus 2E+2 pCi/literused today. By comparing the 2014 sampling results to the decaycorrected average preoperational concentration reported in the2007 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report(1.11 E+2 pCi/liter), it can be seen that the inventory of tritium in theenvironment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclearweapons testing and Chernobyl, and is decreasing with time.2. Drinking waterMonthly samples were composited from monthly grab samplesfrom six drinking water wells (1N, 1S, 37, 38, 39, and 114). Station1, because it is located on the OCGS site, could potentially beaffected by radioactive releases from the plant. Station 1 was splitinto two separate locations, 1N and 1S. Station 38, the OceanTownship Municipal Utility Authority Well, could potentially beaffected by effluent releases from the OCGS. Given its distancefrom the facility (1.6 miles) and depth (approximately 360 feet),however, the probability of any OCGS related impacts is very small.Stations 37 and 39, Lacey Township Municipal Utility Authoritywells, are not likely to be impacted by effluents from the OCGS.These wells are located generally up-gradient of the regional13 groundwater flow direction (southeast). In addition, because of theirdepth (> 200 feet) and distance from the site (2.2 and 3.5 milesrespectively), they are unlikely to be affected by OCGS operations.The following analyses were performed:TritiumMonthly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity(Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected.Drinking water was sampled during the preoperational program andthroughout the 43 years of the plant's operational program. Tritiumsampling results during the preoperational years, yielded results allless than the minimum detectable concentration of 1 E+3 pCi/liter.2014 results are all less than the current MDC of 2E+2 pCi/liter.Gross BetaMonthly samples from all locations were analyzed forconcentrations of total gross beta activity (Tables C-11.2, AppendixC). Gross beta was detected in 41 of 51 samples, and is expecteddue to natural sources and fallout residual from previous bombtesting. The values ranged from 1.8 to 21.1 pCi/I.The investigation level for gross beta in water is 15 pCi/I. Drinkingwater sample 1 N result for gross beta exceeded the investigationlevel beginning in January 2012.The initial result for gross beta was 15.1 pCi/I in 2012. This issuewas entered into our Corrective Action Program (CAP) and aninvestigation initiated. The 1 N water sample was analyzed forknown beta emitters Sr-89, Sr-90, Fe-55 and Ni-63. Theseanalyses results were all <MDC. It was also identified that the 1 Nwell treatment system was upgraded the previous month and apotassium chloride softener system was added as part of theupgrade. Samples were obtained pre and post treatment. Thepre-treatment result for gross beta was 3.6 pCi/I, which is a valuethat has been seen previously in drinking water samples. Thepost-treatment sample result for gross beta was 22.2 pCi/I.Based on the fact that there were no typical plant produced betaemitters detected and that natural potassium is a known betaemitter along with the results of the pre and post sampling, thegross beta values obtained for 1 N can be attributed to the additionof the water softener system installed during the system upgrade inDecember of 2011.14 IodineMonthly samples from all locations were analyzed for 1-131 by thelow level method to detect down to 1 pCi/L (Table C-11.3, AppendixC). All results were less than the MDC.Gamma SpectrometrySamples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emittingnuclides (Table C-11.4, Appendix C). All nuclides were less thanthe MDC.3. GroundwaterThe following analyses were performed:TritiumSamples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (TableC-I11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected.Gamma SpectrometrySamples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emittingnuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less thanthe MDC.4. FishFish samples comprised of bottom feeder (silver perch, whiteperch, and summer flounder) and predator (American Eel, stripedbass, and bluefish) were collected at three locations (33, 93, and94) semiannually. Locations 93 and 33 could be affected by OysterCreek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:Gamma SpectrometryThe edible portions of fish samples from three locations wereanalyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C).Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations andranged from 3,219 to 5,340 pCi/kg wet and was consistent withlevels detected in previous years. No fission or activation productswere found.15 No fish were sampled during the preoperational sampling programfor OCGS.5. Clams and CrabsClams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94)semiannually. Crabs were collected at two locations (33 and 93)annually. Locations 23, 24, 33, and 93 could be affected by OysterCreek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:Gamma SpectrometryThe edible portions of clam samples from all three locations wereanalyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C).Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations andranged from 1,235 to 1,944 pCi/kg wet and was consistent withlevels detected in previous years. No fission or activation productswere found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in FigureC-1, Appendix C.Preoperational clam sample results for naturally occurringPotassium-40 ranged from 600 to 9,800 pCi/kg wet, which areconsistent with current sample results.The edible portions of crab samples from two locations wereanalyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.2, Appendix C).Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at both stations andranged from 1,950 to 2,186 pCi/kg wet and was consistent withlevels detected in previous years. No fission or activation productswere found.Crabs were not sampled during the preoperational years of theOCGS environmental monitoring program.6. SedimentAquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24,33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek'seffluent releases. The following analysis was performed:Gamma SpectrometrySediment samples from all four locations were analyzed for gammaemitting nuclides (Table C-V.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring16 Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 783 to14,800 pCi/kg dry. Cesium-137 was not detected in any of thesamples. No fission or activation products were found. Figure C-3,Appendix C graphs Cs-1 37 concentrations in sediment from 1984through 2014 and figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2014.The requirement for sampling sediment is a requirement of ODCM3.12.1, Table 3.12.1-1.d. ODCM Table 3.12.1-2, Reporting Levelsfor Radioactive Concentrations in Environmental samplesReporting Levels does not include requirements for sediment.CY-AA-170-1000, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programand Meteorological Program Implementation, Attachment 1,Analytical Results Investigation Levels, includes sedimentinvestigation level for Cs-1 37 of 1000 pCi/kg, dry.While aquatic sediment sampling was part of the preoperationalprogram, samples were not analyzed for gamma emitting nuclidesuntil 1981.In conclusion, the 2014 aquatic monitoring results for surfacewater, drinking water, fish, clams and crabs showed only naturallyoccurring radioactivity and were consistent with levels measuredprior to the operation of OCGS, and with levels measured in pastyears. No radioactivity attributable to activities at OCGS wasdetected in any aquatic samples during 2014 and no adverselong-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data.B. Atmospheric Environment1 .Airbornea. Air ParticulatesContinuous air particulate samples were collected from eightlocations on a weekly basis. The eight locations wereseparated into three groups: Group I represents locationsnear the OCGS site boundary (20, 66 and 111), Group IIrepresents the locations at an intermediate distance from theOCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group III represents thecontrol and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (Cand 3). The following analyses were performed:17 Gross BetaWeekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of betaemitters (Table C-VI.1 and C-VI.2, Appendix C).Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.Comparison of results among the three groups aids indetermining the effects, if any, resulting from the operationof OCGS. The results from the Site Boundary locations(Group I) ranged from 6 to 39 E-3 pCi/m3 with a mean of 14E-3 pCi/m3.The results from the Intermediate Distancelocations (Group II) ranged from 6 to 34 E-3 pCi/m3 with amean of 14 E-3 pCi/m3.The results from the Distantlocations (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 27 E-3 pCi/m3 with amean of 13 E-3 pCi/m3.The similarity of the results from thethree groups indicates that there is no relationship betweengross beta activity and distance from OCGS. These resultsare consistent with data from previous years and indicate noeffects from the operation of OCGS (Figures C-4 and C-5,Appendix C).Air sample filters have been analyzed for gross beta activitysince the inception of the preoperational environmentalmonitoring program in 1966. The preoperational data valuesranged from 1.90E-2 to 2.77E-1 pCi/m3. 2014 gross betaactivity values ranged from <6E-3 to 39E-3 pCi/m3. The2014 results are consistent with historical operational data(Figure C-5, Appendix C) and fall within the range of resultsobserved during the preoperational period.Strontium-89 and Strontium-90Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzedfor strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VI.3, AppendixC). No strontium was detected in any of the samples. Theseresults are consistent with historical operational data. Thepreoperational environmental monitoring program did notinclude analysis of air samples for strontium-89 andstrontium-90.Gamma SpectrometryWeekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzedfor gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VI.4, Appendix C).Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity wasdetected in all samples. The values ranged from 35 to 10618 E-3 pCi/m3.All other nuclides were less than the MDC.These results are consistent with historical operational data.The preoperational environmental monitoring program didnot include analysis of air samples for gamma emittingnuclides.b. Airborne IodineContinuous air samples were collected from eight (C, 3, 20,66, 71, 72, 73, 111) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131(Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). Consistent with historicaloperational data, all results were less than the MDC for1-131.The preoperational environmental monitoring program forOCGS did not include analysis of air media for iodine-1 31.In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data areconsistent with preoperational and prior operational data andshow no long-term trends in the environment attributable tothe operation of OCGS.2. Terrestriala. VegetationSamples were collected from four locations (35, 36, 66, and115) when available. The following analyses wereperformed:Strontium-89 and Strontium-90Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed forconcentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less thanthe MDC. Strontium-90 was detected in 24 of 60 samples.The values ranged from 1.3 to 9.5 pCi/kg wet, which isconsistent with historical data.The following information on Strontium 90 is available on theNRC web page under "Backgrounder Radiation Protectionand the "Tooth Fairy" Issue" published in December of 2004.The largest source of Sr-90 in the environment (,-,99%) isfrom weapons testing fallout. Approximately 16.8 million19 curies of strontium-90 were produced and globally dispersedin atmospheric nuclear weapons testing until 1980. As aresult of the Chernobyl accident, approximately 216,000curies of Sr-90 were released into the atmosphere. With a28 year half-life, Sr-90 still remains in the environment atnominal levels.The total annual release of strontium-90 into theatmosphere from all 103 commercial nuclear power plantsoperating in the United States is typically 1/1000th of acurie. (NUREG/CR-2907 Vol.12). At an individual nuclearpower plant, the amount of Sr-90 is so low that it is usuallyat or below the minimum detectable activity of sensitivedetection equipment.Oyster Creek did not report any Sr-90 released in the AnnualRadioactive Effluent Release Report as all analyses for Sr-90performed were less than the minimum detectable activity.Gamma SpectrometryVegetation samples from locations 35, 36, 66, and 115 wereanalyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides(Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40activity was found in all samples and ranged from 2,313 to10,020 pCi/kg wet. Naturally occurring Be-7 was detected in18 of 60 samples and ranged from 105 to 1,982 pCi/kg wet.All other nuclides were less than the MDC.Preoperational vegetation sample analyses did not includestrontium analyses or gamma spectroscopy.Oyster Creek conducted a Cs-1 37 study in 2006/2007. Areport was generated titled "Evaluation of Cesium-1 37 inEnvironmental Samples from the Amergen Property East ofthe Oyster Creek Generating Station". Below is an excerptfrom that report:The levels of Cs-1 37 observed in the soil and vegetationsamples are consistent with environmental concentrationsknown to be attributable to fallout from historic nuclearweapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. In addition, thevariability of Cs-1 37 concentrations in soil and vegetation onthe farm property appears to be driven by a number ofenvironmental factors. Cs-137 concentrations in soil werenon-detectable. Vegetation samples exhibited Cs-13720 concentrations from non-detectable to 0.130 pCi/g, with amean concentration of 0.078 pCi/g. For comparison, in theyear 2000, as part of the confirmatory release survey for theadjacent Forked River site to the west of OCGS, the NRCreported that the maximum observed soil concentration of0.53 pCi/g was not distinguishable from the variation in Cs-137 in the environment due to these fallout sources. TheNRC also reported background Cs-1 37 concentrations inNew Jersey coastal plain soils as high as 1.5 and 2.8 pCi/g.In addition, decay-corrected historic REMP data from apredominantly upwind location, nearly four miles from theOCGS, yields present-day Cs-1 37 concentrations rangingfrom 0.862 to 1.68 pCi/g.There was no Cs-1 37 identified in REMP soil and vegetationsamples in 2014, but it is not unusual for Cs-1 37 to beidentified given the known environmental levels of thisradionuclide attributable to atmospheric nuclear weaponstesting and the Chernobyl accident.In conclusion, terrestrial monitoring results for vegetationsamples during 2014 showed only naturally occurringradioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout frompast atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl.The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levelsmeasured in past years, and no radioactivity attributable toactivities at OCGS was detected in any terrestrial samples.The terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-termtrends in the terrestrial environment.C. Ambient Gamma RadiationAmbient gamma radiation levels were measured using OpticallyStimulated Luminenscence Dosimeters (OSLD). Sixty-one OSLDlocations were monitored around the site. Results of non-backgroundcorrected OSLD measurements are summarized in Tables C-IX.1 toC-IX.3 and Figures C-6 and C-7.The non-background corrected OSLD measurements ranged from 4.9 to16.0 mR/standard quarter. In order to correct these results for backgroundradiation, the mean of the dose rates measured at the background OSLDstations (C and 14) was subtracted from the dose measured at eachindicator station. The maximum annual background corrected dose was22.3 mR/year at Station 55, located near the site boundary, 0.3 miles westof the OCGS. This OSLD is located in an area where public access is21 restricted but the nearest member of the public for direct radiation isconsidered an individual that works in the warehouse west of the site.The individual is assumed to work 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> per year at this location.The preoperational environmental monitoring program utilized filmbadges, the results of which are not comparable with the doses measuredusing thermoluminescent dosimeters or optically stimulated dosimetersduring the operational REMP. In conclusion, the 2014 OSLD results areconsistent with past operational measurements of direct radiation, anddemonstrate that the OCGS continues to be in compliance with the 40CFR 190 limit on maximum dose to the public.D. Land Use SurveyA Land Use Survey, conducted in August 2014 around the Oyster CreekGenerating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates,Inc. for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey is to identify within adistance of 5 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors ofthe nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden ofgreater than 500 ft2 producing broad leaf vegetation. The census shallalso identify within a distance of 3 miles the location in each of the 16meteorological sectors all milk animal and all gardens greater than 500square feet producing broadleaf vegetation. For animals producing milkfor human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors outto a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS, none were observed. Thedistance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Buildingwere determined using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology.There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of thissurvey. The results of this survey are summarized below.22 Distance in Feet from the OCGS Reactor BuildingSector Residence Garden*(ft) (ft)1 N 5,655 8,2242 NNE 3,240 3,5413 NE 3,245 5,1154 ENE 5,704 6,4455 E 6,549 1,7586 ESE 3,189 2,0817 SE 3,073 2,3218 SSE 4,666 8,3419 S 7,971 9,01110 SSW 8,344 20,13011 SW 9,285 9,77612 WSW 10,713 14,80213 W 22,191 None14 WNW None None15 NW 27,985 None16 NNW 7,506 14,487*Greater than 500 ft2 in size producing broad leaf vegetationE. Summary of Results -Inter-laboratory Comparison ProgramThe primary and secondary laboratories analyzed PerformanceEvaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetationand water matrices (Appendix F). The PE samples, supplied by AnalyticsInc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed AnalytePerformance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against thefollowing pre-set acceptance criteria:1. Analytics Evaluation CriteriaAnalytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of TBE's result andAnalytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned byAnalytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internalQC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.2. ERA Evaluation CriteriaERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for controland warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptancelimits are established per the USEPA, the National EnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), state specificperformance testing (PT) program requirements or ERA's SOP for23 the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable.The acceptance limits are either determined by a regressionequation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limitpromulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.3. DOE Evaluation CriteriaMAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range withassociated flag values.The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable(flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and NotAcceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptablewhen a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of thereference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when amean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the referencevalue (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, theresults are deemed not acceptable.In reviewing our environmental inter-laboratory crosscheck programs, weidentified 1) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2)that we are performing crosscheck samples on some matrices andisotopes that we do not perform for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP isdesigned to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyzefor radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, theneeded changes were made to the MAPEP program. Therefore, thefollowing isotopes were removed from the MAPEP program:Soil -gamma -will be provided by Analytics twice per year, starting in2015. For 2014, one soil gamma is provided by MAPEP, the 2nd soilgamma is provided by Analytics.AP -gamma -is currently provided by Analytics.Water -gamma, H-3, Sr-90, uranium, gross alpha and gross betacurrently provided by ERA.MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they werereported in the previous series.For the TBE laboratory, 163 out of 169 analyses performed met thespecified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-131 inwater, and two Sr-90s and one Gross Alpha in AP samples) did not meetthe specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Ni-63 in waterresult of 32.7 +/- 1.69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data24 but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 -44.2 Bq/L.NCR 14-042. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 K-40 in waterresult of 1.63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the databut would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-043. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2014 1-131 in waterresult of 15.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L,falling below the lower acceptance limit of 16.8. The result wasevaluated as failed with a found to known ratio of 0.778. No causecould be found for the slightly low result. All previous ERA 1-131evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-084. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2014 Sr-90 in APresult of 0.822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.18Bq/sample, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 0.83Bq/sample. The reanalysis result was still low, but fell within thelower acceptance range of 0.836. The reanalysis result wasstatistically the same number as the original result. No cause couldbe found for the slightly low results. NCR 14-045. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 inAP result of 0.310 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of0.703 Bq/sample. The gravimetric yield of 117% was very high (wenormally see yields of 60% to 70%) and could account for the lowactivity. The reanalysis result of 0.508 was still low, but fell withinthe lower acceptance range of 0.492. No cause could be found forthe slightly low results. NCR 14-096. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2014 Gr-Alphain AP result of 0.153 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of0.53 Bq/sample. The AP sample was counted on the wrong side.The AP was flipped over and recounted with acceptable results.TBE does not perform the gross alpha analysis in support of REMPprograms. All effluent AP samples are digested and analyzed as aportion of the total volume (typically 10%). In conclusion, this errorcould not be duplicated on client effluent APs, because the MAPEPAP is counted as a whole and the client effluent AP sample isdigested. TBE routinely performs Analytics AP gross alpha blindsample analysis with no issues. NCR 14-09For the EIML laboratory, 85 of 90 analyses met the specified acceptancecriteria. Five analyses (Water -Pu-238, Pu-239, Fe-55; AP -Co-57; Soil-Cs1 34) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the followingreasons:25

1. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014water Pu-238 result of 1.28 Bq/L was higher than the known valueof 0.83 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 1.08 Bq/L. Thehigh bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from anewly purchased standard. The result of the reanalysis with thenew tracer was 0.68, which fell within the acceptance criteria.2. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014water Pu-239/240 result of 0.91 Bq/L was higher than the knownvalue of 0.68 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 0.88 Bq/L.The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from anewly purchased standard. The result of reanalysis with the newtracer was 0.66 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.3. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014AP Co-57 result of 1.60 +/- 0.05 Bq/total sample failed the falsepositive test. Interference from the Eu-152 resulted in themisidentification of Co-57.4. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP February 2014soil Cs-1 34 result of 6.10 +/- 1.80 Bq/kg failed the false positive test.Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturallyoccurring Bi-214 in the sample matrix with a close spectral energy.5. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratory's MAPEP August 2014water Fe-55 result of 55.10 +/- 14.80 Bq/L was higher than theknown value of 31.50 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of41.00 Bq/L. The result of the reanalysis of Fe-55 was 32.63 +16.30 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.V. References1 .Exelon Nuclear. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for Oyster CreekGenerating Station, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position,An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1,November 1979.3 Pre-Operational Environmental Radiation Survey, Oyster Creek NuclearElectric Generating Station, Jersey Central Power and Light Company, March1968.26 VI. ErrataCorrections to the 2012 AREORThe value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in thereport as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to atelephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standardquarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas ofthe report:1. Page A-14, TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FOR THE OYSTERCREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 -the mean for the indicatorstations is listed as 19.8 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be19.9 millirem/standard quarter.2. Page C-21, TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTERCREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 -The mean for station 113 islisted as 15.7 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.9millirem/standard quarter.3. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FORTHE SITE BOUNDARY, INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST ANDCONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2012 -the mean for the Site Boundary for APR-JUN is listed as19.5 millirem/standard quarter and the value should be 20.6millirem/standard quarter.4. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3 SUMMARY OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRYPROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 -TheSite Boundary Period Minimum is listed as 0.0 millirem/standard quarterand the value should be 18.3 millirem/standard quarter.5. Page C-22, TABLE C-IX.3 SUMMARY OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRYPROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012 -TheSite Boundary Period Mean is listed as 20.9 millirem/standard quarter andthe value should be 21.2 millirem/standard quarter.27 APPENDIX ARADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING REPORT SUMMARY TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONSURFACE WATER(PCIIrTER)H-32828200 <LLD<LLD0GAMMAMN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65NB-95ZR-9515 <LLDI5 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD00000001-1310(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONSURFACE WATER(PCI/LITER)CS-134CS-137BA-140LA-140DRINKING WATER(PCI/LITER)H-3GR-B1-131GAMMAMN-545151515115 <LLD18 <LLD60 <LLD15 <LLDNA <LLD4 6(36/39)(1.8/21.1)1 <LLD15 <LLD15 <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD2(5/12)(2/3)<LLD<LLD<LLD000000013(12/12)(1.8/21.1)I N INDICATORON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS0.2 MILES N OF SITE00CO-58(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F.) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONDRINKING WATER(PCI/LITER)FE-59CO-60ZN-65NB-95ZR-95CS-134CS-137BA-140LA-14030 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD18 <LLD60 <LLD15 <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD000000(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONGROUNDWATER(PCI/LITER)H-388200 <LLDNA0GAMMAMN-54FE-59CO-60ZN-6515 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD30 <LLD15 <LLD15 <LLDNANANANANANANANA00000000NB-95ZR-951-131CS-134(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M.) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION 4 REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONGROUNDWATER(PCI/LITER)CS-137BA-140LA-140GAMMAK-4018 <LLD60 <LLD15 <LLDNANANA000BOTTOM FEEDER(PCI/KG WET)4NA 4622(3/3)(3838/5340)MN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65130 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD3714(I/I)<~LLD<LLD<~LLD<~LLD<~LLD4622(3/3)(3838/5340)33 INDICATOREAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE000000(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONBOTTOM FEEDER(PCI/KG WET)PREDATOR(PCI/KG WET)CS-134CS-137GAMMAK-40MN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65CS-134130 <LLD150 <LLD<LLD<LLD007NA 3919(4/4)(3219/4883)4577(3/3)(3457/5287)4883(1/1)33 INDICATOREAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE130 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD130 <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD000000(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONPREDATOR(PCI/KG WET)CLAMS(PCI/KG WET)CS-137GAMMAK-40MN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65CS-134150 <LLD<LLD06NA 1600(4/4)(1235/1944)130 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD100 <LLD1oo <LLD1756(1/2)<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD1859(2/2)(1774/1944)23 INDICATORBARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE00000000CS-137(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (Mf) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONCRABS(PCI/KG WET)00GAMMAK-40MN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65CS-134CS-137GAMMABE-7NA 2068(2/2)(1950/2186)130 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD130 <LLD260 <LLD100 <LLD100 <LLDNA <LLDNANANANANANANANA2186(1/1)33 INDICATOREAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE000000002SEDIMENT(PCI/KG DRY)<LLD0(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONSEDIMENT(PCI/KG DRY)K-40MN-54,>0CO-58NA 4814(6/6)(783/9740)NA <LLDNA <LLDNA <LLD150 <LLD180 <LLD14005(2/2)(13210/14800)14005(2/2)(13210/14800)<LLD094 CONTROLGREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE0<LLD0CO-60<LLD0CS-134<LLD0CS-137<LLDAIR PARTICULATE(E-3 PCI/CU.METER)GR-B41510 14(301/311)(6/39)1314(100/104) (51/52)(6/27) (7/37)11I INDICATORFINNINGER FARM0.3 MILES ENE OF SITE0(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONAIR PARTICULATE(E-3 PCI/CU.METER)SR-893210 <LLD<LLD0SR-90GAMMABE-73210 <LLD<LLD0,>32MN-54CO-58NA 56(24/24)(35/106)NA <LLDNA <LLDNA <LLD50 <LLD55(8/8)(36/74)<LLD65(4/4)(35/106)FINNINGER FARM ON SOUTH SIDE ACCESS ROAD0.7 MILES E OF SITE20 INDICATOR00<LLD0CO-60<LLDCS-134<LLD0(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONAIR PARTICULATE(E-3 PCI/CU.METER)AIR IODINE(E-3 PCI/CU.METER)VEGETATION(PCI/KG WET)CS-13760 <LLD<LLD0GAMMA1-131SR-8941570 <LLDZLLD06025 <LLD<LLD0SR-90GAMMABE-760605 4.6(15/45)(1.5/7.8)NA 471(17/45)(105/1982)NA 4721(45/45)(2316/10020)60 <LLD5.6(9/15)(1.3/9.5)339(I/15)5.6(9/15)(1.3/9.5)561(7/15)(208/1982)4942(15/15)12316/7555)36 CONTROLU-PICK FARM -NEW EGYPT NJ23.1 MILES NW OF SITE066 INDICATOR 0EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHARGE0.4 MILES SE OF SITEK-401-1314387(15/15)(2313/6549)115 INDICATOREAST OF SITE, ON FINNINGER FARM0.3 MILES E OF SITE00<LLD(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014NAME OF FACILITY: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 2014LOCATION OF FACILITY: OCEAN COUNTY, NJMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT LOCATIONS, LOCATION, NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) (F) (F) (F) NAME MEASUREMENTSRANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTIONVEGETATION(PCI/KG WET)CS-134CS-137BA-140LA-14060 <LLD80 <LLDNA <LLDNA <LLDNA 8.4(236/236)(4.9/16.0)<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD00000DIRECT RADIATION(MLLIREM/STD.MO.)OSLD-QUARTERLY2449.2(8/8)(7.9/10.8)14.8(4/4)(13.1/16.0)55 INDICATORSOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE0.3 MILES W(M) THE MEAN VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(F) FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES APPENDIX BLOCATION DESIGNATION,SAMPLE COLLECTIONDISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND& ANALYTICAL METHODS TABLE B-I: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek GeneratingStationSample MediumStation CodeDistanceAzimuthDescriptionAPT = Air Particulate Clam = ClamAIO = Air Iodine OSLD = Optically StimulatedDW = Drinking Water DosimetryVEG = Vegetation Fish = FishSWA = Surface Water Crab = CrabAQS = Aquatic Sediment GW = Ground WaterSStation's Designation-Distance from the OCGS in milesSAzimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees-Meteorological sector in which the station is located and anarrative descriptionB-I TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014,ZSampleMediumOSLDDWDWAPT, AIO, OSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDAPT, AIO, OSLDOSLDOSLDAPT, AIOOSLDSWA, CLAM, AQSSWA, CLAM, AQSSWA, AQS, FISH,CRABVEGVEGStationCode1is1N345689C111420222324333536Distance(miles)0.40.10.26.04.64.22.12.32.024.78.220.80.71.63.62.10.40.423.1Azimuth(degrees)219209349972133531317723031315229514564101123111319DescriptionSW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJOn-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJOn-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJEast of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State ParkSSW of site, Route 554 and Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJNorth of site, at Garden State Parkway Rest Area, Forked River, NJNNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJSouth of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJWSW of site, west of where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meet,Waretown, NJNW of site, JCP&L office in rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJSSE of site, 80te and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJNorth of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJEast of site, on Finninger Farm on south side of access road, Forked River, NJSE of site, on Long John Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJENE of site, Bamegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of"Flashing Light 1"East of site, Bamegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of "Flashing Light 3"ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge in OCGS Discharge CanalESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River,NJNW of site, at "U-Pick" Farm, New Egypt, NJ TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Sample Station Distance AzimuthMedium Code (miles) (degrees) DescriptionDW 37 2.2 18 NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJDW 38 1.6 197 SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown,NJDW 39 3.5 353 North of Site, Trenton Ave. off Lacey Rd, Lacey Twp. MUA Pump Station, ForkedRiver, NJOSLD 46 5.6 323 NW of site, on Lacey Road, adjacent to utility pole BT 259 65, Forked River, NJOSLD 47 4.6 26 NNE of site, Route 9 and Harbor Inn Road, Bayville, NJOSLD 48 4.5 189 South of site, at intersection of Brook and School Streets, Bamegat, NJOSLD 51 0.4 358 North of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJOSLD 52 0.3 333 NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJOSLD 53 0.3 309 NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site, ForkedRiver, NJOSLD 54 0.3 288 WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJOSLD 55 0.3 263 West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard,Forked River, NJOSLD 56 0.3 249 WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGSSwitchyard, Forked River, NJOSLD 57 0.2 206 SSW of site, on Southem Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJOSLD 58 0.2 188 South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJOSLD 59 0.3 166 SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJOSILD61 0.3 104 ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014SampleMediumOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDStationCode62Distance(miles)0.2Azimuth(de8rees)8363 0.2 7064 0.3 4265 0.4 1966 0.4 133APT, AIO,OSLD, VEGOSLD'APT, AIO,OSLDAPT, AIO,OSLDAPT, AIO,OSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLDOSLD6871727374757879811.3 2661.6 1641.9 251.8 108DescriptionEast of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road,Forked River, NJNE of site, on Route 9 North at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJNNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJSE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence,Waretown, NJWest of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 71.7, Lacey Township,NJSSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJNNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJEast of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maui Drive, Forked River, NJNorth of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJSSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive, Waretown, NJSSW of site, on Rose Hill Road at intersection with Barnegat Boulevard, Bamegat,NJNE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJNNW of site, on Lacey Road, 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on sirenpole, Lacey Township, NJWSW of site, on Route 532, just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown, NJSW of site, on Route 554, 1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway, Bamegat, NJSE of site, eastern end of 3rd Street, Bamegat Light, NJESE of site, Job Francis residence, Island Beach State Park1.82.01.82.93.58871216020182 4.4 3684 4.4 332858688893.95.06.66.1250224125108 TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Sample StationMedium CodeOSLD 90OSLD 92FISH, CRABSWA, AQS, CLAM, 94FISHOSLD 98OSLD 99OSLD 100OSLD 101OSLD 102OSLD 103OSLD 104OSLD 105OSLD 106OSLD 107OSLD 109OSLD 110APT, AIO 111OSLD 112Distance(miles)6.39.00.120.01.61.51.41.71.62.41.82.8Azimuth(degrees)75462421983183104349344337221222DescriptionENE of site, parking lot A-5, Island Beach State ParkNE of site, at Guard Shack/Toll Booth, Island Beach State ParkWSW of site, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9,Forked River, NJSSW of site, in Great Bay/Little Egg HarborNW of site, on Garden State Parkway North at mile marker 73, Lacey Township, NJNW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJNE of site, Yacht Basin Plaza South off Lakeside Dr., Lacey Township, NJNE of site, end of Lacey Rd. East, Lacey Township, NJNNW of site, end of Sheffield Dr., Bamegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJNNW of site, Llewellyn Pkwy., Barnegat Pines, Lacey Township, NJSW of site, Rt. 532 West, before Garden State Parkway, Ocean Township, NJSW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 69.6, Ocean Township,NJWNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.2, LaceyTownship, NJWNW of site, Garden State Parkway North beside mile marker 72.5, LaceyTownship, NJSE of site, Lighthouse Dr., Waretown, Ocean Township, NJSE of site, Tiller Dr. and Admiral Way, Waretown, Ocean Township, NJENE of site, Finninger Farm property along access road, Lacey Township, NJS of site, along southern access road1.2 2881.3 3011.21.50.30.214112764178 TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014SampleMediumOSLDDWVEGOSLDGWGWStation Distance AzimuthCode (miles) (derees)113 0.3 90114 0.8 267115 0.3 96T1 0.4 219MW-24-3A 0.8 97W-3C 0.4 112DescriptionE of site, along Rt. 9, NorthWell at Bldg 25 on Forked River siteE of Site, on Finninger FarmSW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJESE of site, Finninger Farm on South side of access road, Lacey Township, NJESE of site, Finninger Farm adjacent to Station 35, Lacey Township, NJ TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014,=Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure NumberMediumDrinking Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysisradiological analysisEnv. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters byCY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection gamma spectroscopyprocedure -well waterDrinking Water Tritium Monthly samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquidradiological analysis scintillationCY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (directprocedure -well water method)Drinking water Iodine Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2031 Radioiodine in drinking waterwater samples for radiological analysisEnv. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in water byCY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection an ion exchangeprocedure -well waterDrinking Water Gross Beta Monthly Samples ER-OCGS-06, Collection of 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity inwater samples for radiological analysis various matricesCY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection Env. Inc., W(DS)-01 Determination of gross alpha and/orprocedure -well water gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)Env. Inc., W(SS)-02 Determination of gross alpha and/orgross beta in water (suspended solids)Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysisradiological analysisEnv. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters bygamma spectroscopySurface Water Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquidradiological analysis scintillationEnv. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (directmethod)Groundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-14 analysis by liquidradiological analysis scintillationGroundwater Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of water samples for 1 gallon TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysisradiological analysisFish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples ER-OCGS-14, Collection of fish samples for 250 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysiscollected via hook and radiological analysisline technique and traps Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters bygamma spectroscopyClams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual ER-OCGS-16, Collection of clam and crab 300 grams (wet) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysisCrabs samples collected using samples for radiological analysisclam tongs and traps. Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters byI 1_ _1_ 1gamma spectroscopy TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure NumberMediumSediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab ER-OCGS-03, Collection of aquatic sediment 1000 grams (dry) TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysissamples samples for radiological analysisEnv. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters bygamma spectroscopyAir Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha and/or beta activity incontinuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic meters various matricesthrough glass fiber filter weekly)paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/orgross beta in air particulate filtersAir Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples 13 filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysiseach station (approximately 4000Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing air cubic meters) Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters byparticulate filters for gamma spectroscopic gamma spectroscopyanalysisAir Particulates Strontium-89/90 Quarterly composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 13 filters TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ioneach station particulate samples for radiological analysis (approximately 4000 exchangecubic meters)Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy One-week composite of ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air 1 filter (approximately TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysiscontinuous air sampling particulate samples for radiological analysis 300 cubic metersthrough charcoal filter weekly) Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoalcanisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysisgrowing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiologicalanalysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters bygamma spectroscopyVegetation Strontium-89/90 Grab sample during ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and 1000 grams TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchangegrowing season broadleaf vegetation samples for radiologicalanalysisOSLD Optically Stimulated Quarterly OSLDs ER OCGS-02, Collection/Exchange of Field 2 dosimeters Landauer IncorporatedLuminescence comprised of two Dosimeters for Radiological AnalysisDosimetry A1203:C LandauerIncorporated elements.,0 Oyster Creek Generating StationREMP Sample Locationswithin a I Mile Radius0.3 01" a 003Figure B-1Locations of REMP Stations within a 1-mile radiusof the Oyster Creek Generating StationB-9 Figure B-2Locations of REMP Stations within a 1 to 5-mile radiusof the Oyster Creek Generating StationB-10 Oyster Creek Generating StationREMP Sample Locationsover a 5 Mile Radius5.5 2VS 0& WTFigure B-3Locations of REMP Stations greater than 5 milesfrom the Oyster Creek Generating StationB-II APPENDIX CDATA TABLES AND FIGURESPRIMARY LABORATORY Table C-I.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTEDIN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIOD01/09/14 -01/28/1402/06/14 -02/27/1403/05/14 -03/26/1404/16/14 -04/16/1405/09/14 -05/28/1406/06/14 -06/25/1407/02/14 -07/31/1408/08/14 -08/27/1409/29/14 -09/29/1409/30/14 -10/29/1411/07/14 -12/03/1412/12/14 -12/30/1423 24 33 94< 167< 188< 168 << 188 <193170200189157166188162179160185160185173167186158165188161180162188166MEANC-I Table C-I.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODMn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-14023 U4/16i14 -U4/16/14 < 409/29/14 -09/29/14 < 5MEAN<4 <lU <b<6 <9 <4<5 <13 <4<6 <12 <4<9 <5 <8 <13 <4 <4 <27 <10<11 <6 <8 <15 <5 <6 <30 <824 04116114 -04/16(14 < 509/29/14 -09/29/14 < 5<10 <5 <9 <14<11 <5 <10 <15<4 <5 <32 <10<5 <5 <35 <13MEAN33 01/08114 -01/28/14 < 202/06/14 -02/27/14 < 603/05/14 -03/26/14 < 404102/14 -04/30/14 < 205/07/14 -05/28/14 < 406/06/14 -06/25/14 < 507/02/14 -07/30/14 < 408/08/14 -08/27/14 < 709/03/14 -09/24/14 < 309/29/14 -10/29/14 < 711/07/14 -12/03/14 < 412/10/14 -12/30/14 < 6MEAN<2<6<4<2<5<5<5<6<3<7<4<6<2<5<3<2<9<7<3<7<3<7<5<6<5 <2<13 <6<10 <5<5 <2<10 <5<13 <6<10 <5<13 <6<6 <3<15 <6<9 <4<12 <6<6 <2<9 <5<9 <4<5 <2<11 <8<12 <5<5 <3<13 <5<11 <4<18 <9<10 <4<13 <5<4< 13<8<4<10*13< 11<11<5< 13<9<12<4<9<7<4< 16<13<4< 11<9<16<9< 13<2<5<4<2<5<5<5<6<3<6<4<6<3<5<4<2<8<7<2<6<4<6<5<6<3 <13< 10 < 15<8 <15<4 <8<9 <8< 12 < 12<7 <14< 12 < 13<5 <9< 10 < 10<7 <8<10 <11<4 <14<7 <12<7 <14<4 <7< 12 < 12< 11 < 11<4 <6<9 <12<8 <13<13 <9<8 <9< 13 < 12<2<5<4<2<6<7<5<6<2<7<4<5<2<4<3<2<6<5<2<5<4<7<5<6<2<6<4<2<6<7<5<7<3<9<5<6<2<5<4<2<7<5<2<6<4<7<5<5<21 <6<34 <10<28 < 11<17 <4<21 <8<28 < 11< 30 <9< 37 <8<16 <5<31 <9< 23 <8< 26 <7<24 <9< 28 <9< 27 <9<15 <5< 35 <9<28 <8<16 <5< 28 < 10<25 < 11< 28 < 11< 23 <9< 33 <994 01/09/14 -01/28/14 < 202/06/14 -02/27/14 < 503/05/14 -03/26/14 < 404/04/14 -04/30114 < 205/09/14 -05/28/14 < 706/06114 -06/25/14 < 607/02/14 -07/31/14 < 208/08/14 -08/27114 < 509/03/14 -09/24114 < 409/30/14 -10/29/14 < 811/07/14 -12/03/14 < 512/12/14 -12/30/14 < 6MEAN Table C-I1.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIOD114IN1s37383901/15/14 -U01/281402/06/14 -02/27/1403/05/14 -03/26/1404/04/14 -05/01/1405/09/14 -05/28/1406/06/14 -06/26/1407/02/14 -07/31/1408/08/14 -08/27/1409/17/14 -09/23/1410/01/14 -10/29/1411/07/14 -12/03/1412/12/14 -12/30/14< 18< 175< 185< 183< 153< 192< 188< 165< 181< 161 (1)< 186< 163< 187< 177< 164< 188< 159< 159< 188< 166< 180< 164< 186< 185(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)< 181 (1)< 161< 185(1)< 189< 173< 169< 186< 158< 184< 186< 165< 180< 160< 187< 162< 166< 166< 166< 184< 157< 192< 188< 165< 180< 160< 187< 164(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)MEANTable C-11.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIOD114IN iS37383901/15/14 -01/28/1402/06/14 -02/27/1403/05/14 -03/26/1404/04/14 -05/0111405/09/14 -05/28/1406/06/14 -06/26/1407/02/14 -07/31/1408/08/14 -08/27/1409/17/14 -09/23/1410/01/14 -10/29/1411/07/14 -12/03/1412/12/14 -12/30/143.2 +3.4 +/-4.5 +3.1 +/-3.5 +/-< 1.93.0 +4.0 +3.7 +3.4 +4.4 +5.5 +/-1.31.81.41.31.21.31.41.41.3 (1)1.41.49.9 +/- 2.015.4 +/- 2.58.3 +/- 1.61.8 +/- 1.221.1 +/- 2.313.6 +/- 2.012.6 _ 1.914.9 + 2.215.3 + 2.114.4 + 2.017.1 +/-2.113.2 + 1.9(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)< 1.8 (1)3.3 +/- 1.32.7 +/- 1.3(1)< 1.9< 2.62.3 +/- 1.2< 1.62.8 +/- 1.1< 1.72.4 +/- 1.2< 1.9< 1.71.8 +/- 1.1< 1.62.4 +/- 1.12.3 +/- 1.1< 2.41.8 +/- 1.12.1 +/- 1.23.2 +/- 1.12.3 +/- 1.32.2 +/- 1.22.5 +/- 1.32.6 +/- 1.22.3 +/- 1.12.1 +/- 1.23.3 +/- 1.2(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)MEAN3.8 +/- 1.5 13.1 +/- 9.7 3.0 +/- 0.9 2.4 +/- 0.7 2.4 +/- 0.9Table C-11.3CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIOD114IN1s37383901/15/14 -01/28/1402/06/14 -02/27/1403/05/14 -03/26/1404/04/14 -05/01/1405/09/14 -05/28/1406/06/14 -06126/1407/02/14 -07/3111408/08/14 -08/27/1409/17/14 -09/23/1410/01/14 -10/29/1411/07/14 -12/03/1412/12/14 -12/30/14< 0.8< 0.7< 0.6< 0.8< 0.7< 0.5< 0.4< 0.7< 0.6< 0.9 (1)< 0.9< 0.6< 0.7< 0.9< 0.5< 0.8< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.7< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.4(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)< 0.9 (1)< 0.6< 0.7(1)< 0.8< 0.7< 0.7< 0.6< 0.8< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.4< 0.5< 0.9< 0.7< 0.7< 0.6< 0.8< 0.5< 0.5< 0.7< 0.6< 0.5< 0.7< 0.5(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)MEAN ---THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC-3 Table C-II.4 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODMn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140114 01/09i14 -01/2/14 < 202/06/14 02/27/14 < 403/05/14 03/26/14 < 404/04/14 04/30/14 < 205/09/14 05/28/14 < 306/06/14 06/26/14 < 507/02/14 07/31/14 < 308/08/14 08/27/14 < 509/03/14 09/24/14 < 310/01/14 10/29/14 (1) < 411/07/14 12/03/14 < 512/12/14 12/30/14 < 4MEAN<2<4<4<2<4<6<4<6<3<4<5<4<2<5<4<2<6<6<3<5<3<6<3<8<4< 10<8<4<7< 12<9<8<8<9< 10< 10<5<9<8<5< 11< 11<6<9<6<8<8< 12<2<4<5<2<4<6<4<6<3<6<4<5<2<4<3<2<5<6<2<4<3<6<3<5< 3 <2<8 <5<9 <5<4 <2<7 <4<13 <7<7 <5<11 <6<9 <4<8 <4<8 <5<10 <5<4 <2<9 <4<8 <4<4 <2<11 <6<10 <6<5 <3<8 <4<6 <4<10 <5<7 <3<15 <7< 3<7<8<4<6< 10<8< 10<5<8<7<8<4<8<5<4<8<9<5<9<6< 11<6< 10< 1<4<4<2<4<6<4<6<3<4<4<4<2<4<3<2<6<5<2<5<3<6<3<6<2<5<5<2<4<8<4<6<4<5<4<5<2<4<4<2<6<5<3<4<3<6<4<8<19 <b<29 <8<31 <9<15 <4<16 <5<31 < 10<28 < 10<28 <7<24 <9<21 <5<31 <8<25 <7<23 <7<33 <8<32 <11< 12 <4<27 <6<29 < 10<18 <6<26 <7<26 <8<24 <8<18 <6< 36 < 121IN 01/07/14 -01/27/14 < 202/04/14 -02/25114 < 403/04/14 -03/25/14 < 304/01/14 -04/30/14 < 205/06/14 -05/27/14 < 406/03/14 -06/24/14 < 507/01/14 -07/29/14 < 208/04/14 -08/26/14 < 509/02/14 -09/23/14 < 310/01/14 -10/28/14 < 511/04/14 -12/03/14 < 312/03/14 -01/06/15 < 8MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION Table C-II.4CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIOD1S 01/09/14- 01/28/14 (1)02/06/14- 02/27/14 (1)03/05114 -03126114 (1)04/04/14 -04/30/14 (1)05/09114 -05/28/14 (1)06/06/14 -06/25114 (1)07102114 -07/31114 (1)08/08/14 -08127/14 (1)09/17/14 -09/23/14 (1)10/01/14 -10/28/1411/04/14 -12/02/1412/02/14 -12/30/14 (1)Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140MEAN<3<6<4<2<3<4<2<6<5<4<7<4<7<4<6<4<6<3<2<4<4<2<6<5<4<7<4<6<4<6<8< 12<7<4<8< 10<4< 18<9<9< 16<9<12<9<15<4<6<3<7<11<7<4<6<3<2<4<4<2<7<5<4<8<4<7<4<6<6< 10<6<3<6<7<4< 12<8<7<15<8<13<8< 12<3<6<3<2<3<4<2<7<4<3<7<4<8<4<6<3<7<3<2<3<4<2<9<4<4<8<4<7<4<6* 28* 29*18* 20* 22* 29*15< 39* 28* 25* 42* 28* 30* 22< 33<9<9<637 01/09/14- 01/28/1402/06/14- 02/27/1403/05/14- 03/26/1404/04/14- 04130/1405/09/14 -05128/1406/06/14 -06/25/1407/02114 -07/31/1408/08/14 -08/27/1409/03/14 -09/24/1410/01/14 -1012911411/05/14 -12/0411412/12/14 -12/30114<2<4<4<2<6<5<4<7<3<6<4<8<3<7<8<4< 11<8<6<17<8< 12<8< 16<5<8<10<4<9<9<8< 11<8<8<6< 14MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION Table C-II.4CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMAMn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140SITE COLLECTIONPERIOD38 01115/14 -01/2802106/14- 0212703/05/14- 03/2604104/14- 05/0105/07/14- 0512806/06114- 06/2607/02/14- 07/3108/08/14- 08/27/09/03/14- 09/24.10/01114 -10/2911105/14- 12/0412/10/14 -12/30/14114'14/14/14/14/1414114114114/14<2<4<4<2<7<6<4<5<5<5<4<5<2<4<4<2<8<7<5<5<4<5<4<6<5<9<8<5< 12< 13< 10< 12< 10< 11<8< 11<2<4<4<2<6<7<4<5<5<5<4<5<4<8<8<4< 12< 14< 10<6<9< 10<8<9<2<5<4<2<6<7<5<5<4<6<4<5<4<8<7<4< 13< 12<9< 10<8< 11<8<8<2<4<3<2<6<7<4<5<5<8<4<4<2<5<4<2<6<8<5<5<5<6<4<6< 21< 25< 33< 15< 35< 36< 27< 29< 30< 26< 23< 27<6<7<7<4<8< 10<9<9< 10<5<7<7MEAN39 01/07/14-02/04/14 -03/04/14 -04/01/14 -05/06/14 -06/03/14 -07/01/14 -08/04/1409/02/1410101/1411/04/14 -12/03/1401/27/1402/25/1403/25/1404/30/1405/27/1406/24/1407129/1408/26/1409/23/1410/28/1412/03/1401/06/15(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION Table C-III.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTEDIN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIODMW-24-3AW-3C01/15i14 -U1011404/08/14 -04/08/1407/23/14 -07/23/1410/16/14 -10/16/14< Itu< 148< 159< 160< 1v< 163< 155< 158MEANC-7 Table C-111.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODMW-24-3A 01115/14 -01/1504/08/14 -04/0807/23/14 -07/2310/16/14 -10/16Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-14053 50 5(114 < 53/14 < 4/14.< 3/14 < 3MEAN<6<3<4<2<5<4<5< 10<5<6<4<9<7< 12< 2<5<3<4<2< 5<"4<5<53<9<6<7<3< 11<8<11<5<3<4<2<5<4<5<10<5<6<3< 10<6<9<11<5<10<7<8<6<11<5 <6<3 <3<3 <45 l10* 27<16< 24<14* 23<17* 28<8<3<8<4<9<6< 11W-3C 01/15/1404/08/1407/23/1410/16/14MEAN-01/15/14-04/08/14-07/23/14-10116/14<2<4<4<4<2<5<4<5<2<5<4<600 Table C-IV.1CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOMFEEDER (FISH) SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTERCREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIOD33 PREDATOR05/29/14K-40Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-1374883 +/- 876 < 69 <67 < 166 < 64 < 142 < 76 < 68MEAN33 BOTTOM FEEDER09/29/1409/29/14 409/29/14MEAN 43838 +/- 14651687 +/- 1187340 +/- 14131622 +/- 1506< 100< 76< 57< 94 < 213< 72 < 191< 70 < 96< 75 < 213< 26 < 179< 83 < 145< 74 < 81< 70 < 67< 63 < 7293 PREDATOR04/14/1409/29/1410/01/14MEAN94 PREDATOR04/15/1409/30/1409/30/14MEAN4044 +/- 9313219 +/- 12473530 +/- 11223598 +/- 833< 65< 89< 91< 71< 75< 102< 167< 182< 254< 68< 88< 121< 136< 160< 220< 64 < 71< 84 < 86< 94 < 805287 +/-4988 +/-3457 +/-978954826< 42< 65< 54< 63 < 135< 64 < 119< 45 < 111< 55 < 136< 44 < 130< 60 < 108< 50 < 49< 58 < 58< 55 < 554577 +/- 196394 BOTTOM FEEDER04/15/14 31714 +/- 846 < 49 < 51< 151 < 57 < 126 < 58 < 66MEANC-9 Table C-IV.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODK-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs- 134 Cs-13723CLAMSCLAMS04/16/1409/29/141944 +/- 634 < 39 < 39 < 92 < 26 < 591774 +/- 658 <48 <43 < 117 < 57 < 92< 36 < 42< 54 < 56MEAN1859 +/- 24024CLAMS 04/16/14CLAMS 09/29/14MEAN1449 +/- 554 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 821235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98< 41 < 44< 68 < 641342 +/- 30333CRAB93CRAB09/29/142186 +/- 762 < 53 < 56 < 131 < 48 < 122 < 58 < 60MEAN09/29/141950 +/- 595 < 33 < 35 < 73< 45 < 91< 29 < 44MEAN94CLAMS 04/15/14CLAMS 09/30/141756 +/- 554 < 41 < 43 < 93 < 41 < 85 < 40 < 44< 472 < 64 < 72 < 161 < 72 < 111 < 58 < 65MEANTHE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUESC-IO Table C-V.1CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTION Be-7K-40Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137PERIOD23 04/16/14 < 49409/29/14 < 7472096 +/- 634 < 503842 +/- 906 < 46< 49< 55< 41 < 49 < 58< 42 < 52 < 68MEAN2969 +/- 246924 04/16/14 < 36109/29/14 < 956783 +/- 401 < 319740 +/- 1425 < 86< 33 < 36 < 30 < 30< 111 < 83 < 76 < 91MEAN5261 +/- 1266833 04/14/14 < 62409/29/14 < 7217428 +/- 1101 < 614994 +/- 978 < 64< 55< 67< 63 < 63 < 79< 51 < 37 < 69MEAN6211 +/- 344294 04/15/14 < 628 14800 +/- 1688 < 7909/30/14 < 1160 13210 +/- 2003 < 85< 72 < 74 < 73 < 89< 113 < 76 < 98 < 106MEAN14005 +/- 2249C-1I Table C-VI.1CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIODGROUP II2001/02/14 -01/08/14 1501/08/14 -01/15/14 1501/15/14 -01/23/14 1201/23/14 -01/29/14 1001/29/14 -02/06/14 1302/06/14 -02/12/14 3902/12/14 -02/19/14 1802/19/14 -02/27/14 1102/27/14 -03/05/14 2503/05/14 -03/12/1403/12/14 -03/19/14 2203/19/14 -03/26/14 1503/26/14 -04/02/14 1404/02/14 -04/09/14 1204109/14 -04/16/14 1404/16/14 -04/23/14 1704/23/14 -05/01/14 705/01/14 -05/07/14 1205/07/14 -05/14/14 1505/14/14 -05/21/14 1105/21/14 -05/28/14 1605/28/14 -06/04/14 906/04/14 -06/11/14 1306/11/14 -06/18/14 1506/18/14 -06/25/14 906/25/14 -07/02/14 1107102/14 -07/09/14 1507/09/14 -07/16/14 1507/16/14 -07/23/14 1107/23/14 -07/30/14 1007/30/14 -08/06/14 908/06/14 -08/13/14 1408/13/14 -08/20/14 1608/20/14 -08/27/14 808/27/14 -09/03/14 1009/03/14 -09/10/14 1309/10/14 -09/17/14 909/17/14 -09/24/14 1309/24/14 -10/01/14 1410/01/14 -10/08/14 1110/08/14 -10/14/14 1310/14/14 -10/22/14 910/22/14 -10/29/14 1610/29/14 -11/05/14 1311/05/14 -11/12/14 1911/12/14 -11/19/14 1111/19/14 -11/25/14 2211/25/14 -12/03/14 1612/03/14 -12/10/14 1312/10/14 -12/17/14 2112/17/14 -12/23/14 912/23/14 -12/30/14 11t+/-5t+/-5t+/-4t+/-6t+/-4t+7+5+/-4+/-651+5+/-5+5+/-5+5+/-4+/-6+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-4+/-5+/-5+/-5+5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-5t+/-5+/- 5t+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-6+/-4+/-t5+/-5+/-5+/-5+/-6+/-4+/-5+/-5+/-6+/-56613 +/-516 +/-520 513 +/-612 +/-424 +/-616 +/-511 +/-421 +/-619 +/-518 +/-511 +/-515 511 +/-517 +/-515 +/-57+/-410 +/-616 +/-56+/-314 +/-510 512 +/-512 +/-58+/-59+/-513 +/-518 +/- 518 +/- 59+/-511 +/-512 +/-513 +/-510 +/-516 +/- 610 +/- 58+/-517 +/-519 +/-515 +/-513 +/-611 +/-514 +/-513 +/-518 +/-511 520 +/- 616 +/- 59+/-521 +/-6<812 +/-514 514 +/-519 +/-518 +/-613 +/-437 +/-716 +/-413 +/-427 +/-721 +/-519 +/-514 513 +/-511 517 511 +/-58+/-414 +/-617 +/-510 +/- 515 +/- 59+/-59+/-511 +/-58+/-512 +/-515 +/-520 510 +/-58+/-59+/-517 +/-513 59+/-516 +/-611 5<712 +/-516 +/-512 +/-517 +/-67+/-414 +/-522 +/-614 513 +/-522 +/-617 +/-512 525 +/-69+/-611 +/-57112 +/- 512 +/- 519 +/- 516 +/- 69+/-434 +/-712 +/-411 +/-428 +/-719 +/-517 +/-518 +/-512 +/-513 +/-518 +/-514 59+/-515 +/-616 +/-512 +/-518 +/-512 +/-511 +/-58+/-57+/-511 +/-515 +/-516 +/-512 +/-511 +/-510 +/-514 512 +/-57+/-4< 713 +/-5< 717 +/- 516 +/- 512 +/- 515 +/- 6< 617 +/- 511 +/-517 +/-513 +/-519 +/-616 +/-511 +/-519 +/-59+/-67+/-5GROUP 117217 +/-516 +/-515 +/-412 +/-614 +/-431 +/-719 +/-512 +/-424 +/-619 521 512 +/-512 +/-411 +/-518 +/-512 +/-57+/-49+/-517 +/-513 520 +/-58+/-46+/-49+/-410 +/-515 +/-412 +/-517 +/-510 +/-412 +/-511 +/-517 +/-512 +/-49+/-48+/-511 +/-59+/-414 +/-515 +/-59+/-414 +/-611 +/-419 517 +/-517 +/-514 +/-421 +/-518 +/-410 +/-519 5<712 +/-57318 +/- S13 +/- 516 +/- 516 +/- 611 +/-426 +/-713 +/-48+/-428 +/-621 519 +/-515 +/-512 +/-510 +/-517 514 57+/-412 t 615 +/- 512 +/- 518 +/- 58+/-413 +/-511 +/-5<713 +/-58+/-512 +/-512 +/-5< 715 +/-511 +/-512 +/-56+/-312 +/-511 5< 713 +/-513 +/-513 +/-517 +/-68+/-415 +/-513 +/-514 +/-513 +/-521 +/- 618 +/- 511 +/- 519 t 5< 812 +/- 5316 +/- 516 +/- 511 +/-414 +/-611 +/-425 +/-617 +/-520 +/-425 +/-618 +/-513 +/-413 +/-512 +/-48+/-314 +/-411 +/-56+/-414 +/-514 +/-57+/-516 +/-56+/-47+/-48+/-46+/-410 +/-413 +/-412 +/-5< 7 (1)< 6(1) 14 +/- 510 +/- 47+/-47+/-511 59+/-47+/-412 +/-410 +/-517 +/-69+/-314 513 +/-517 +/-511 +/-421 +/-514 +/-49+/-520 +/- 510 +/- 510 +/- 4P IIIC18 +/- 516 +/- 518 +/-514 +/-617 +/-421 +/-618 +/-513 +/-427 +/-621 +/-521 +/-513 513 i. 411 +/-418 +/-515 57+/-421 +/-915 +/-512 +/-513 +/-514 +/-410 +/-412 +/- 59+/-512 +/-414 +/-514 i 49+/-414 +/-511 +/-516 t 515 +/- 58+/-t413 t 59+/-t59+/-415 +/-515 +/-519 +/-514 +/-68+/-415 +/-59+/-422 +/-510 +/-419 +/-514 +/-411 +/-520 +/-5<713 +/-5UMEAN14+/-t10 14 +/-8 14 +/-11 14 +/-1014 +/-10 14 +/-9 12 +/-9 14+/- 9THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC-I12 Table C-VI.2MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIRPARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMAGROUP I -ON-SITE LOCATIONSGROUP II -INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONSGROUP III -CONTROL LOCATIONSCOLLECTIONPERIOD01/02/1401/29/1402/27/1404/02/1405/01/1406/04/1407/02/1407/30/1409/03/1410/01/1410/29/1412/03/14-01/29/14-02/27114-04/02/14-05/01/14-06/04/14-07/02/14-07/30/14-09/03/14-10/01/14-10/29/14-12/03/14-12/30/14MIN MAX MEAN+/-2SD10 20 15 +/- 611 39 19 +/- 1911 27 18 +/- 97 17 12 +/- 76 17 12 +/- 68 15 11 +/- 58 20 13 +/-88 17 12 +/- 68 19 13 +/- 77 17 13 +/- 611 22 16 +/- 89 25 14 +/- 116 39 14 +/- 10COLLECTIONPERIODMIN MAX MEAN+/-2SDCOLLECTIONPPRIODMIN MAX MEAN+/-,q1n01/02/1401/29/1402/27/1404/02/1405/01/1406/04/1407/02/1407/30/1409/03/1410/01/1410/29/1412/03/140112911402/27/1404/02/1405/01/1406/04/1407/02/1407/30/1409/03/1410/01/1410/2911412/03/1412/30/141281278686981171934281820151717171921191517181214101211131416135181187556576901/02/1401/29/1402/27/1404/02/1405/01/1406/04/1407/02/1407/30/1409/03/1410/01/1410/29/1412/03/14-01/29/14-02/27/14-04/02/14-05101/14-06/04/14-07/02/14-07/30/14-09/03/14-10/01/14-10/29/14-12/03/14-12/30/1411111266697789918252718211214161519222015 +/- 518 +/- 917 +/- 1111 +813 89+/-512 +411 +/-711 +613+/- 715 +/-913 901/02/14 -12/30/1401/02/14 -12/30/146 34 14 +/- 901/02/14 -12/30/146 27 13 +/-9 Table C-VI.3CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER 12 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIOD3 01/02/14 -04/02/1404/02/14 -07/02/1407/02/14 -10/01/1410/01/14 -12/30/14MEANSR-89SR-90<9<5<9<5<2<5<2<2SITE COLLECTIONPERIOD72 01/02/14 -04/02/1404/02/14 -07/02/1407/02/14 -10/01/1410/01/14 -12/30/14SR-89SR-90<9<5< 10<4<2<6<2<2MEAN20 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14<9<7<7<5<2<5<2<273 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14<7<7<8<9<2<6<2<2MEANMEAN66 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14<8<7<7<8<2<6<2<2111 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30114<8<6<6< 10<2<7<2<3MEANMEAN71 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14<9<7<7<9<3<6<2<2C 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14< 10<7<9<5<2<6<1<2MEANMEANC-14 Table C-VI.4CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIOD3 01/02/14 -04/02/1404/02/14 -07/02/1407/02/14 -10/01/1410/01/14 -12/30/14MEANBe-7Mn-54 Co-58Co-60Cs-134 Cs-13774614343+/- 24+/- 32+ 16_+1955 +/- 3020 01/02/1404/0211407/02/1410/01/14MEAN66 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14MEAN71 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14MEAN72 01/02/1404/02/1407/0211410/01/14MEAN73 01102/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14MEAN111 01/02/1404/02/1407/02/1410/01/14MEANC 01/0211404/0211407/02/1410/01/14MEAN-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02114-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02/14-07/02114-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14-04/02/14-07/02/14-10/01/14-12/30/14811063537+/- 22+/- 25+/- 21+/- 2065 +/- 7064425462+/- 17+/- 20+/- 31+/- 2955 t 1974604265+/- 22+/- 25+/- 27+/- 2360 +/- 27<3<3<2<2<3<3<3<2<2<3<4<4<2<3<4<3<3<2<4<2<3<3<3<2<4<4<2<4<2<2<2<2<4<4<2<2<3<4<2<2<3<3<4<4<3<3<5<4<4<2<4<2<3<3<3<3<4<4<3<4<2<3<2<3<3<4<3<3<3<3<3<2<3<3<6<2<3<3<6<3<2<3<4<1<3<3<2<2<4<5<3<5<2<2<3<2<4<4<2<2<3<2<3<3<2<3<4<3<3<3<4<3<3<4<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<5<2<3<2<5<3<3<1<3<2<2<3<2<2<4<4<2<4<2<1<2<267554745_+_+++/-2622321753 +/- 204232333357 +/-35 +/-46 +/-52 _1818191748 +/- 1975 +/-52 +/-46 +/-46 +/-30281833<3<5<3<455 +/- 2870 +/-68 +/-48 +/-36 +/-22261622223255 +/- 32C-15 Table C-VII.1CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIOD01/02/14 -01/08/1401108/14 -01/15/1401/15/14 -01/23/1401/23/14 -01/29/1401/29/14 -02/06/1402/06/14 -02/1211402/12/14 -02/19/1402/19/14 -02/27/1402/27/14 -03/05/1403105/14 -03/12/1403/12/14 -03/19/1403/19/14 -03/26/1403/26/14 -04/02/1404/02/14 -04/09/1404/09/14 -04/16/1404/16/14 -04/23/1404/23/14 -05/01/1405/01/14 -05/07/1405/07/14 -05/14/1405/14/14 -05/21/1405/21/14 -05/28/1405/28/14 -06/04/1406/04/14 -06/11/1406/11/14 -06/18/1406/18/14 -06/25/1406/25/14 -07/02/1407/02/14 -07/09/1407/09/14 -07/16/1407/16/14 -07/23/1407/23/14 -07/30/1407/30/14 -08/06/1408/06/14 -08/13/1408/13/14 -08/20/1408/20/14 -08/27/1408/27/14 -09/03/1409/03/14 -09/10/1409/10/14 -09/17/1409/17/14 -09/24/1409/24/14 -10/01/1410/01/14 -10/08/1410/08/14 -10/14/1410/14/14 -10/22/1410/22/14 -10/29/1410/29/14 -11/05/1411/05/14 -11/12/1411/19/14 -11/25/1411/25/14 -12/03/1412/03/14 -12110/1412/10/14 -12/17/1412/17/14 -12/23/1412/23/14 -12/30/14U20* 23* 35* 34* 60* 40* 68* 65* 36* 68(1)* 68* 41* 39* 30* 42* 43* 44* 59* 45*51*24* 43* 62* 53* 37*50*62* 44* 66*50*42* 49* 63* 66* 56* 67* 64* 69* 26* 47* 60* 41* 46*51*62*16* 64* 32* 35* 58* 67* 62GROUP 166* 59* 37* 43* 60* 27* 56* 55* 36* 67* 45* 69* 41* 40* 31* 43* 61* 17* 53* 46* 53* 69* 39* 70* 56* 41* 44* 68*51* 64* 69* 41* 40* 65* 69* 22* 67* 66* 65* 70* 63* 62* 34* 46* 59* 48* 17* 66* 33* 36* 70* 69* 70i11* 56* 35* 32* 58* 38* 54* 62* 34* 67* 45* 70* 41* 40* 30* 43* 60* 45* 53* 46* 53* 68* 39* 64* 56* 41* 52* 67*51*68*70* 44* 40* 65* 67* 57* 67* 13* 65* 70* 49* 61* 34* 46* 59* 48*z 17* 66* 33* 36* 69* 69* 7071* 58* 36* 42* 59* 27* 56* 55* 35.* 67* 19* 68* 41* 16* 18* 43* 61* 44* 53* 46* 20* 68* 39* 69* 56* 40* 45* 67*50* 64* 68* 16* 40* 64* 69* 56* 66* 66* 64* 69* 62* 24* 33* 46* 59* 48* 17* 66* 13* 14* 69* 69* 69GROUP 1172* 58* 34* 14* 58* 40*67* 64* 36*62*40*63*38*42*40*40* 39* 35* 55*38*62* 54*40*24* 49* 34* 45*58*40*60*46* 39* 45*65*60* 53*62*62*64*62* 43*25*38*42* 47* 57*15* 59* 35* 33*67*69* 5773* 59* 37* 43*60*27* 57*56*36*65* 44*67*40* 39*30*16*60* 43*52* 45*51*67*38*68* 55* 39* 44*66* 49*63*67*40*39 (1)*25*67* 55*65*64*63*68*61*60* 33* 45*58* 47*17*65*32* 35*68*30< 68I GROUPHII3*60* 35* 34* 57<11*65*58* 34*63*13* 57* 39*42*40*40* 39*36*56*38*62* 54*40*58* 49*15*64*58*41* 55*48 (1)*40*46*66*62* 53*63*63*65*63*18*60*16*42*48*58*15* 59* 35* 34*67*68*58C*58* 35* 34* 54* 33*68* 34* 34*62* 37*56*38*42*40*40* 37* 37* 39*38*62*64*40*58*52* 35*63*58*41*50*48*42*46*65*62*50*64*63*64*63* 47* 59*38*18*48* 57*15* 59* 35* 33* 67* 70* 58MEAN----(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC- 16 Table C-VIII.1CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATIONSAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODSR-89SR-90Be-7K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140La-140115 0i30i11406/30/1406/30/1407/30/1407/30/1407/30/1408/20/1408/20/1408/20/1409/16/1409/16/1409/16/1410/22/1410/22/1410/22/14MEANCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKale<9<9< 9< 15< 10< 14< 15< 15< 16<8<9< 10< 16< 17< 15< 10<9< 11< 13< 12< 12< 23< 20< 16<9<9< 13< 22< 24< 201.b +/- U.6< 1.1< 1.5< 2.93.9 +/- 1.51.9 + 1.1< 1.75.9 + 1.14.8 +/- 1.2< 2.07.7 +/- 2.07.8 +/- 1.8< 1.3< 2.0< 1.6< 126< 130< 173< 173< 195105 +/- 52< 127< 171< 168< 161< 266< 218233 +/- 109961 +/- 177476 +/- 1276939 +/- 4U05467 +/- 3677319 +/- 3863279 +/- 4137555 +/- 6705846 +/- 1492316 +/- 2975828 +/- 4314816 +/- 4292921 +/- 3485414 +/- 6264434 +/- 5163000 +/- 2424327 +/- 2924671 +/- 309< 24< 36< 41< 43< 57< 58< 57< 53< 43< 52< 52< 58< 59< 544.8 +/- 5.1 444 +/- 755 4942 +/- 3243 -<lij< 12< 19< 18< 19<5< 14< 16< 13< 18< 26< 18<11* 13* 10* 24<10<13< 18* 27* 24<11<14<15* 28<3< 21< 10< 13<11<ilb< 14< 18< 20< 23<6* 15*17<13<17* 25<19<12<12<12< 26<11* 16< 21* 25* 28* 16* 16<15< 24<3< 24< 14< 13< 10* 68< 65< 90< 116< 102< 77< 117< 113< 105< 96< 141< 129< 107< 115< 101* 105< 54< 84< 102< 109< 141< 108< 111< 120< 169< 64< 107< 121< 91< 97< z1< 19< 21< 22< 26< 22< 33< 30< 31< 26< 40< 27< 28< 32< 28< 42< 14< 22< 35< 37< 31< 26< 37< 30< 56< 14< 34< 29< 16< 2635 06/30/1406/30/1406/30/1407/30/1407/30/1407/30/1408/20/1408/20/1408/20/1409/16/1409/16/1409/16/1410/22/1410/22/1410/22/14< 1.51.6 +/- 0.8< 1.6< 2.17.3 +/- 2.15.2 +/- 1.9< 2.4< 2.1< 1.6< 2.6< 3.3< 4.7< 1.95.3 +/- 1.6< 1.6< 177< 92174 +/- 120< 180< 254< 267< 141212 +/- 118< 165< 252217 +/- 81< 254491 +/- 143891 +/- 226322 +/- 1134767 +/- 5725394 +/- 29410020 +/- 5112332 +/- 3585077 +/- 5214333 +/- 5052467 +/- 3214244 +/- 3624559 +/- 3272784 +/- 4803014 +/- 1453384 +/- 5134075 +/- 3973153 +/- 4384921 +/- 304< 37< 21< 29< 39* 50< 55< 52< 54< 56< 57< 59< 54< 46< 44< 55MEAN 4.8 +/- 4.8 384 +/- 547 4302 +/- 3726 -THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUESC-17 Table C-VIII.1CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATIONSAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODSR-89SR-90Be-7K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140La-140Control36 06/30/1406/30/1406/30/1407/30/1407/30/1407/30/1408/20/1408/20/1408/20/1409/16/1409/16/1409/16/1410/31/1410/31/1410/31/14MEANCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKaleCabbageCollardsKale<9<10<11<7<15<9<18<15<19<8<15* 10<7< 10<11<11<11* 10* 18<8<12<13* 14<10<9< 10<9* 16* 20* 191.3 +/- 0.7* 2.6<2.14.1 +/- 1.48.7 +/- 1.82.4 +/- 1.56.0 +/- 1.44.7 +/- 1.29.5 +/- 1.7* 2.29.0 +/- 3.25.1 +/- 2.1* 1.3* 1.7* 1.8* 134* 224* 171* 197< 228339 +/- 131* 163* 119* 155* 233* 231* 280* 156* 198* 1972972 +/- 2946549 +/- 6485388 +/- 4573231 +/- 3655191 +/- 5045046 +/- 5012313 +/- 3374493 +/- 2855654 +/- 3912400 +/- 4634560 +/- 4975017 +/- 6673361 +/- 2864477 +/- 4235160 +/- 352* 27* 51* 40< 49< 59* 52* 60< 59< 59* 58* 52< 59* 52* 58< 575.6 +/- 5.9 -4387 +/- 2510 -* 13* 25* 16<16* 21* 20* 16<11* 13* 21* 24< 24* 14* 17*19* 24* 24< 27* 24* 28* 19< 13<15< 15<17* 21* 22* 14<12*13*12* 26< 16<19* 22* 18<16* 12* 16* 24* 20* 29<15* 20* 18* 23* 24* 30* 25* 23<19<15* 14* 14<15* 27* 24<13<15<15< 74* 134* 100* 114* 145* 135* 114* 107* 136* 151* 108* 141* 104* 145* 125< 97* 125< 143* 132* 120* 98* 110* 105* 115* 102* 126* 130< 99* 103* 118* 18< 43< 24< 37< 37* 26* 38* 25* 32* 41* 32* 38* 36* 32* 23< 38* 27< 39< 31< 24< 27* 28* 28< 33* 24<41* 40* 26* 28< 3366 06/30/1406/30/1406/30/1407/30/1407/30/1407/30/1408/20/1408/20/1408/20/1409/16/1409/16/1409/16/1410/22/1410/22/1410/22/142.7 +/- 0.8* 2.02.1 +/- 0.96.6 +/-2.1* 2.8* 1.9* 1.4* 1.4* 1.45.2 +/- 1.1* 3.2< 3.3* 1.5* 1.8* 1.7* 213* 209* 291* 270* 265* 191* 135480 +/- 155208 +/- 154* 164312 +/- 194214 +/- 141271 +/- 1141982 +/- 218461 +/- 1536274 +/- 6608322 +/- 5006084 +/- 7094950 +/- 6566382 +/- 6693859 +/- 4143191 +/- 3405349 +/- 4294079 +/- 4033738 +/- 4155197 +/- 6893674 +/- 4283503 +/- 3104875 +/- 3744305 +/- 422* 41* 46< 53< 59< 49* 36* 58* 56< 57* 41< 59< 49< 52< 49< 51MEAN4.1 +/- 4.2 561 +/- 1272 4919 +/- 2794THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUESC-18 Table C-IX.1Tabl C-X.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONSTATION MEAN JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL -SEP OCT -DECCODE +/- 2 S.D.1 10.4 +/- 1.9 10.4 +/- 2.7 11.3 +/- 0.4 9.1 +/- 0.3 10.8 +/- 0.63 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.3 +/- 0.4 6.5 +/- 0.6 .5.7 +/- 1.3 7.9 +/- 0.14 9.1 +/- 2.8 10.4 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.0 7.1 +/- 0.8 9.7 +/- 2.85 13.8 +/- 1.5 14.3 +/-0.6 13.1 +/- 2.8 14.6 +/- 2.0 13.3 +/- 4.76 8.4 +/-0.5 8.2+/-2.5 8.7 +/-0.3 8.3 +/-1.6 8.2 +/-0.68 7.6 +/-1.3 8.4+/-0.5 7.9 +/-1.2 6.9+/-t0.9 7.3 +/-1.09 6.3 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/-3.1 6.1 t 2.1 5.3 +/- 1.3 6.8 t 1.3C 8.5 +/-1.0 8.9+/-1.1 7.9 +/-1.3 8.2 +/-1.4 8.9 +/-1.711 8.0 +/- 1.0 7.6 +/-0.8 8.1 +/- 2.1 7.6 +/- 1.4 8.6 +/- 1.414 9.9 +/- 1.6 8.9 t 1.6 10.8 +/- 2.3 9.9 +/- 1.6 9.8 +/- 0.722 7.1 +/- 0.9 6.7 +/- 0.3 7.0 +/- 0.7 7.0 +/- 0.1 7.8 +/- 1.346 6.3 +/- 2.0 7.2 +/- 0.4 7.0 +/- 0.0 5.7 +/- 0.7 5.2 +/- 0.447 7.9 +/- 1.7 8.3 +/- 0.7 7.3 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 4.9 8.8 +/- 0.348 8.3 +/- 1.2 9.1 +/- 2.0 8.5 +/- 0.0 7.7 +/- 0.6 8.0 +/- 2.351 10.7 +/- 2.2 11.5 t 2.4 9.8 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 2.1 11.8 +/- 2.152 11.9 +/- 2.8 11.1 +/- 4.5 11.5 +/- 1.1 11.1 +/- 2.8 14.0 +/- 2.153 10.4 +/- 2.7 10.9 +/- 0.6 12.0 +/- 0.6 8.9 +/- 0.3 9.7 +/- 0.754 7.6 +/- 2.5 9.3 +/- 1.1 7.8 +/- 0.4 6.6 +/- 2.8 6.8 +/- 0.455 14.8 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.1 14.8 +/- 1.3 15.2 +/- 1.3 16.0 +/- 1.156 13.0 +/- 2.1 13.3 +/- 0.3 14.0 +/- 1.0 11.5 +/- 2.4 13.1 +/- 0.657 9.3 +/- 1.5 10.2 +/- 1.0 9.6 +/- 2.7 (1) 8.4 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.358 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.9 +/- 0.7 8.8 +/- 2.4 7.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.359 9.1 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 0.6 10.1 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 1.8 9.0 +/- 1.361 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.8 +/- 0.0 7.1 +/- 0.3 6.8 +/- 1.662 8.3 +/- 1.6 8.6 +/- 0.8 8.3 +/- 1.7 7.2 +/- 2.3 9.1 +/- 0.163 7.8 +/- 0.9 8.1 +/- 0.3 7.2 +/- 1.7 7.7 +/- 0.1 8.1 +/- 1.664 8.5 +/- 1.5 9.6 +/- 1.8 7.9 +/- 0.4 8.2 +/- 1.4 8.3 +/- 2.765 8.6 +/- 2.2 8.6 +/- 1.7 7.6 +/- 0.4 7.9 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.066 7.1 +/- 0.5 7.3 +/- 0.9 7.2 +/- 0.8 6.9 +/- 1.3 6.8 +/- 1.868 6.7 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 2.7 6.9 +/- 3.4 (1) 6.1 +/- 1.0 6.3 +/- 2.571 8.5 +/- 3.0 9.9 +/- 1.7 6.4 +/- 6.1 9.0 +/- 0.3 8.5 +/- 1.772 8.2 +/- 0.6 8.4 +/- 1.0 7.8 +/- 1.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 8.1 +/- 0.373 7.6 +/- 1.9 8.8 +/- 4.0 7.2 +/- 0.1 6.6 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.774 7.8 +/- 1.2 8.3 +/- 5.1 8.2 +/- 0.0 7.0 +/- 0.8 7.5 +/- 1.175 9.3 +/- 1.8 9.4 +/- 3.5 8.5 +/- 0.7 10.5 +/- 2.7 8.7 +/- 0.478 8.4 +/- 1.5 8.8 +/- 0.8 8.4 +/- 0.8 7.3 +/- 2.3 9.0 +/- 0.779 9.2 +/- 0.9 8.8 +/- 0.9 9.0 +/- 2.4 9.0 +/- 0.9 9.8 +/- 1.581 7.6 +/- 1.3 8.3 +/- 2.0 7.4 +/- 3.4 6.8 +/- 1.4 7.8 +/- 0.382 8.3 +/- 1.1 7.5 +/- 1.0 8.4 +/- 0.0 8.5 +/- 1.3 8.7 +/- 0.484 8.1 +/- 1.4 7.7 +/- 2.0 7.6 +/- 0.1 9.1 +/- 0.3 8.1 +/- 0.485 7.2 +/- 2.4 8.8 +/- 3.1 6.2 +/- 0.7 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.4 +/- 0.6 (1)86 8.5 +/- 2.1 10.0 +/- 2.0 7.9 +/- 0.6 7.7 +/- 1.0 8.3 +/- 1.688 6.4 +/- 1.8 7.4 +/- 2.3 7.0 +/- 0.4 5.6 +/- 1.8 5.7 +/- 1.089 6.1 +/- 1.9 6.7 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 0.8 5.2 +/- 2.0 7.0 +/- 0.790 6.8 +/- 2.6 7.8 +/- 0.0 4.9 +/- 1.0 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.4 +/- 0.3(1)92 8.4 +/- 1.3 8.8 +/- 1.7 8.8 +/- 0.3 7.4 +/- 2.3 8.6 +/- 0.198 7.5 +/- 0.7 8.0 +/- 2.5 7.3 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 0.1 7.2 +/- 1.399 6.7 +/-1.9 7.9 +/-1.8 6.1 +/-1.1 5.8 +/-1.3 7.0 +/-2.0(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC-i19 Table C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONSTATION MEAN JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL -SEP OCT -DECCODE +/- 2 S.D.T1 9.7 +/- 2.1 10.6 +/- 0.7 10.1 +/- 2.3 8.2 +/- 0.3 9.9 +/- 1.7100 7.1 +/- 1.7 7.1 +/- 2.0 8.2 +/- 0.4 6.2 +/- 3.7 6.9 +/- 0.8101 6.9 +/- 1.3 7.8 +/- 1.8 6.3 +/- 0.1 6.8 +/- 0.1 6.5 +/- 1.1102 8.9 +/- 2.3 10.0 +/- 3.5 9.4 +/- 1.8 7.3 +/- 1.0 8.9 +/- 0.1103 7.7 +/- 1.5 8.3 +/- 1.0 7.0 +/- 0.4 7.1 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 0.6104 8.5 +/- 1.9 9.3 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 3.1 7.4 +/- 2.3 9.3 +/- 0.6105 5.9 +/- 1.4 6.8 +/- 2.5 5.4 +/- 0.4 5.3 +/- 1.1 5.9 +/- 0.3106 6.9 +/- 1.2 7.4 +/- 1.8 6.8 +/- 1.4 6.1 +/- 4.0 7.3 +/- 1.1107 7.1 +/- 1.1 7.4 +/- 1.1 6.3 +/- 1.3 7.3 +/- 0.1 7.5 +/- 0.4109 8.5 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 2.4 8.4 +/- 4.1 8.1 +/- 0.1 9.2 +/- 0.1110 7.4 +/- 1.2 8.1 +/- 0.1 7.6 +/- 4.1 6.8 +/- 0.6 7.0 +/- 0.6112 11.1 +/- 0.8 11.6 +/- 2.5 10.9 +/- 0.7 11.1 +/- 0.6 10.7 +/- 0.3113 7.4 +/- 1.1 7.3 +/- 2.8 7.4 +/- 0.0 6.8 +/- 1.4 8.1 +/- 0.4C-20 TABLE C-IX.2MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY,INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOROYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM PER STANDARD QUARTER +2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATACOLLECTIONPERIODSITE BOUNDARY+/- 2 S.D.INTERMEDIATESPECIAL INTERESTCONTROLJAN-MARAPR-JUNJUL-SEPOCT-DEC9.8 +/- 3.69.7 +/- 4.58.8+/-4.39.8+/-5.08.4 +/- 2.97.7 +/- 2.87.4 +/- 3.58.0 +/- 3.08.1 +/- 1.86.9 +/- 2.67.0 +/- 2.67.7 +/- 1.98.9 +/- 0.09.4 +/- 4.19.1 +/-2.49.4 +/- 1.3TABLE C-IX.3SUMMARY OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/STD. QUARTERLOCATIONSAMPLES PERIOD PERIODANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUMPERIOD MEAN+/-2 S.D.SITE BOUNDARYINTERMEDIATESPECIAL INTERESTCONTROL761243686.65.24.97.916.014.69.910.89.5 +/- 4.47.9 +/- 3.17.4 +/- 2.49.2 +/- 1.9SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS -1,112,113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61,62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TIINTERMEDIATE STATIONS- 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,109,110, 22, 4,46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS -11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92CONTROL STATIONS -14, CC-21 FIGURE C-1MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMSOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 -201420 .............................................................................................................................................................0 INDICATOR STATION9-BACKGROUND STATION15I->S10 ........................................................................................................000 0nYEARThe year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number ofsampling periods per year.

FIGURE C-2MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENTOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 -2014350 ...........................................................................................................................................................-INDICATOR STATION MEAN300 ...... .. ................................................................................ ..BACKGROUND STATION MEAN1 0 0 .. ............ ... ................... ........................................................................................................250...... ....... ........................................................................................I-&Rn 200- (2oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON-0 ~ -q e4YEARThe year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number ofsampling periods per year.

FIGURE C-3MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENTOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 -20140c- INDICATORM 1DA &'?C D ITn11TX~600 -------------------------------------------------------------E2 00400. ... ..... .....-. .- --.-- --.- -.--- ---.- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----0._0tn t- 00 Choo 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON 00 NYEARThe year designations on the x-axis reflect multiple sampling periods in a given year, as well as historical changes in the number ofsampling periods per year.

gz-)picoCuries per cubic meter1/9/20084/9/20087/9/200810/8/20081/6/20094/8/2009_ =7/8/200910/7/20091/6/20104/7/20 107/7/201010/6/20101/5/20114/6/20117/6/2011OT10/5/20111/4/20124/4/20127/3/201210/3/20121/2/20134/3/20137/2/201310/2/20131/2/20144/2/20147/2/201410/1/2014 -.12/30/2014>C) -C)za FIGURE C-5MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONSIN AIR PARTICULATESOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 -20140.18 ICHERNOBYL ACCIDENT0.16 ......!................................................................................I...-. IDIAO.SAIN0.1 ---- -- -- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- --- -- -- --- -- ---* -- --- -- -- --- -- --- -- -- --- -- --- -- -- --- --R SIDI AT RISAT O N-- BACKGROUND STATION *c ~0.12 ...............................................................................................................................0.10 .............................................................................................................................."C 0.08 ...............................................................................................................................00.04 ----------------------------------------------------. .....-------- I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0.02 I0.0000.04 ----------A.YEA R ..... .....* Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996 FIGURE C-6MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD GAMMA DOSEOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 201430 125 41~Ci222 0 ---- -- -- ----- ---- ------ ---- --- ---- -- ------ ------ ----- -- ------ -- -- --- -- -- -- ------ ------- ---- --- -- -- --- ----- ----15 4.....................................................................---------------------------------------------10-50............................................................................................................................................................................... ..................I0OTO 2 MLES2 TO 5 MILESOVER 5 MILESDISTANCE RING FROM PLANTI 1Q14 12Q14 *3Q14 W 4Q14Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012.

FIGURE C-7MEAN QUARTERLY TLD/OSLD GAMMA DOSEOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1990 -2014*70.0Ia nE ------------------------------------------------------------- -- -C T k.FA'---------------------------U BACKGROUND MEAN6_6L.2,6U. ICIV----------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- ---- -------------------------------40.030.0In n---- -------------------- ----- ---- ------- ------- --- -------- --- --- ------------- -------- ---- ------- --------------------- ---10.00.0 mImih iollI11MMIII1i11,l MbhMe4 -n -t- -e -\ eq en4 e'\ t ý CP Z I"Year-Oyster Creek's dosimetry changed from TLD to OSLD in 2012.-In order for Oyster Creek to align with the new ANSI N13.37-2014 Environmental Dosimetry -Criteria for System Design and Implementation,the data was reviewed back to the beginning of 2007 and updated per the guidance in the ANSI Standard.

APPENDIX DDATA TABLESQC LABORATORY The following section presents the results of data analysis performed by the QC laboratory,Environmental Inc. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split betweenthe primary laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and the QC laboratory. Comparisons of theresults for all media were within expected ranges.D-1 TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTION 24 QCA QCBPERIOD04/16/14 < 168 < 165 < 14409/29/14 < 188 < 186 < 149MEAN ---D-2 TABLE D-1.2SITE COLLECTIONPERIOD24 04/16/1409/29/14MEANQCA 04/16/1409/29/14MEANQCB 04/16/1409/29/14MEANCONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTEDIN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMAMn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137<5 <5 <13 <4 <10 <5 <9 <14 <4 < 5<5 <6 <12 <4 <11 <5 <10 <15 <5 <5Ba-140* 32< 35La-140* 10* 13<4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <4<4 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5<8 <12 <3 <5 <28 <10<8 <12 <4 <5 <23 <7<4<2<2<2<4<4<2<2<6<3<2<2<6<3<7<4<2 <4<2 <3<10 <3<10 <2 TABLE D-II.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIODIN1s QCB INQCB 1S01/07/14 -01/27/1402/04/14 -02/25/1403/04/14 -03/25/1404/01/14 -04/30/1405/06/14 -05/27/1406/03/14 -06/24/1407/01/14 -07/29/1408/04/14 -08/26/1409/02/14 -09/23/1410/01/14 -10/28/1411/04/14 -12/03/1412/03/14 -01/06/15< 187< 177< 164< 188< 159< 159< 188< 166< 180< 164< 186< 185(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)< 181< 161< 185(1)< 144< 139< 145< 143< 140< 142< 131< 173< 173< 169< 172< 198(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)149169172(1)MEANTABLE D-II.2CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONPERIODIN1s QCB 1NQCB 1s01/07/14 -01/27/1402/04/14 -02/25/1403/04/14 -03/25/1404/01/14 -04/30/1405/06/14 -05/27/1406/03/14 -06/24/1407/01/14 -07/29/1408/04/14 -08/26/1409/02/14 -09/23/1410/01114 -10/28/1411/04/14 -12/03/1412/12/14 -12/30/14<0.7< 0.9< 0.5< 0.8< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.7< 0.6< 0.6< 0.6< 0.4(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)< 0.9< 0.6< 0.7(1)< 0.5< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.3< 0.4< 0.4< 0.4< 0.2< 0.4< 0.4< 0.3< (1)< (1)< (1)< (1)< (1)< (1)< (1)< (1)< 0.5< 0.3< 0.3(1)MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIOND-4 TABLE D-II.3CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMAMn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95SITE COLLECTIONPERIODZr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140WN 01107114 -01127114 < 202104114 -02/25/14 < 403/04/14 -03/25/14 < 304/01/14 -04/30/14 < 205/06/14 -05/27/14 < 406/03/14 -06/24/14 < 507/01/14 -07/29/14 < 208/04/14 -08/26/14 < 509102/14 -09/23/14 < 310/01/14 -10/28/14 < 511/04/14 -12/03/14 < 312/03/14 -01/06/15 < 8<2<5<4<2<6<6<3<5<3<6<3<8<5 <2<9 <4<8 <3<5 <2<11 <5<11 <6<6 <2<9 <4<6 <3<8 <6<8 <3<12 <5<4 <2<9 <4<8 <4<4 <2<11 <6<10 <6<5 <3<8 <4<6 <4<10 <5<7 <3<15 <7<4<8<5<4<8<9<5<9<6<11<6< 10<2<4<3<2<6<5<2<5<3<6<3<6<2<4<4<2<6<5<3<4<3<6<4<8<23 < 7<33 < 8<32 < 11<12 <4<27 < 6< 29 < 10<18 <6<26 < 7<26 < 8<24 < 8<18 <6< 36 < 12MEAN1s 01/09/14 -01/28/14 (1)02/06/14 -02/27114 (1)03/05/14 -03/26/14 (1)04/04/14 -04/30/14 (1)05/09/14 -05/28/14 (1)06106/14 -06/25/14 (1)07/02/14 -07131/14 (1)08/08/14 -08/27/14 (1)09/17/14 -09/23/14 < 310/01/14 -10/28/14 < 611/04/14 -12/02/14 < 412/02/14 -12/30/14 (1) -<4<6<3<8 <4<12 <6<7 <3<7 <4 <6 <3<11 <6 <10 <6<7 <3 <6 <3<3<7<3<28 < 9<29 < 9<18 <6MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION TABLE D-11.3CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTIONPERIODQOCB 1N 01/07/14 -01/27/1402/04/14 -0212511403/04/14 -03/25/1404/01/14 -04/30/1405/06/14 -05/27/1406/03/14 -06/24/1407/01/14 -07/29/1408/04/14 -08/26/1409/02/14 -09/23/1410/01/14 -10/28/1411/04/14 -12/03/1412/03/14 -01/06/15Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140<1<2<2<2<2<3<3<3<3<5<3<4<1<1<3<2<3<3<4<2<2<2<2<3<2<4<3<4<5<3<5<4<4<3<4<3<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<3<2<3<2<4<2<4<5<5<7<5<5<3<4<3<1<2<2<2<3<2<4<2<3<2<3<4<2<4<4<4<5<3<6<3<5<8<5<4<2<3<4<2<2<2<4<3<3<3<3<3<1<3<3<3<3<3<5<2<3<4<3<4<9<8< 12<10<13< 12< 20< 14<7< 13< 13< 10<3<3<2<2<2<3<4<1<2<3<1<2MEANQCB 1S 01/09/1402/06/1403/05/1404/04/1405/09/1406/06/1407/02/1408/08/1409/17/1410/01/1411/04/1412/02/14-01/28/14 (1)-02/27/14 (1)-03/26/14 (1)-04/30/14 (1)-05/28/14 (1)-06/25/14 (1)-07/31/14 (1)-08/27/14 (1)-09/23/14-10/28/14-12/02/14-12/30/14 (1)<2<3<2<1<2<3<2<4<4<2<4<2<2<3<5<3<3<3<4<3<6<2<3<4<2<3<2<15 <3<14 <2<15 <2MEAN(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION TABLE D-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN.THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTION W-3C QCBPERIOD01/15/14 < 179 < 15204108/14 < 163 < 14207/23/14 < 155 < 13810/16/14 < 158 < 150MEAN --D-7 TABLE D-Ill.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTEDIN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58PERIODW-3C 01115/14 < 2 < 204/08/14 < 4 < 507/23/14 < 4 < 410/16/14 < 4 < 5Fe-59 Co-60

• Zn-65Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140<4 <2 <3<9 <5 <11<7 <4 <8<12 <5 <11<2<5<4<531069<7<8<6<11<2<5<4<5<2<5<4<6<14* 23<17* 28<4<9<6<11MEANQCB 01/15/1404/08/1407/23/1410/16/14MEAN<2<2<2<3<2<1<3<3<2<2<4<4<2<2<1<1<4<6<3<5<3<2<2<35532<7<3<15<6<2<3<1<2<3<2<2<3<13<9* 22<17<1<3<3<500 TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137PERIOD24 04/16/14 1449 +/- 553.6 < 39 < 44 < 73 < 38 < 82 < 41 < 4409/29/14 1235 +/- 732 < 67 < 59 < 123 < 56 < 98 < 68 < 64QCA 04/16/14 2010 +/- 446 < 31 < 27 < 58 < 30 < 57 < 26 < 33QCB 04116114 1785 +/- 97 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 8 < 6 < 4MEAN 1620 +/- 690 ------

TABLE D-V.1CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMASITE COLLECTION Be-7PERIODK-40Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34Cs-137Ra-226Th-228I24 04/16/14 < 36109/29/14 < 956MEAN*QCA 04/16/14 < 40709/29/14 < 818MEAN* -QCB 04/16/14 < 10909/29/14 < 186MEAN* -783 +/- 401 < 31 < 33 < 369740 +/- 1425 < 86 < 111 < 835261 +/- 12668852 +/-464 < 40 < 38 < 3513000 +/- 1700 < 85 < 95 < 72< 30< 76< 42< 62< 10< 17< 30< 91< 43< 81< 11< 151331 +/- 970941 +/- 716< 1300< 3161069 +/- 402426 +/- 61199 +/- 83686 +/- 105392 +/- 831988 +/- 587 211 +/- 651674 +/- 1366 642 +/- 1176926 +/- 8590,0511 +/- 185 < 126535 +/- 480 < 15< 10 < 8< 10 < 13< 951< 12903523 +/- 8519* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE D-VI.1CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLESCOLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/-2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90K-401-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140PERIOD36 CabbageCollardsKaleQCA CabbageCollardsKaleQCB CabbageCollardsKale0713011407/30/1407/30/14MEAN*07/3011407/30/1407/30/14MEAN*07/30/1407/30/1407/30/14MEAN*<* 4.1 +/-< 15 8.7 +/-<9 2.4 +/-1.41.81.53231 +/- 36b5191 +/- 5045046 +/- 501-5.0 +/- 6.5 4489 +/- 2184< 11 5.0 +/- 1.7< 13 <3.5< 16 < 4.02620 +/- 317 <5130 +/- 500 <4830 +/- 512 <495952395959281536< 16 < 19 < 114< 21 < 22 < 145< 20 < 18 < 135< 13 < 15 < 92< 21 < 23 < 126< 22 < 22 < 150< 31< 37< 26< 26< 33* 36<3<8<52.0 + 1.04.0 + 2.07.0 + 2.04193 +/- 27422845 +/- 2904711 +/- 3424179 +/- 364<7 <10 <53 <6< 5 < 12 < 42 < 15< 11 < 10 < 64 < 124.3 + 5.0 3912 +/- 1923* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES APPENDIX EINTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM TABLE E-1ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAMTELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 1 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value(a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)March 2014 E10854E10855El 0857E10856MilkMilkSr-89Sr-901-131Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60pCi/L 95.1 91.7pCi/L 10.9 15.1pCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCi96.611244918625024829223031232153.023210012212213511114018798.511949121025326829721932333753.922395.311512113599.3147153AP Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-137Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60Charcoal 1-131Water Fe-55June 2014E10858E10913E10914E10916E10915E10917pCi 74.1 76.4pCi/L 2090 1760pCi/L 85.9 91.3pCi/L 13.8 14.51.040.720.980.940.910.890.990.930.981.050.970.950.981.041.051.061.011.001.120.951.220.971.190.940.950.950.901.010.911.030.940.991.041.000.971.031.131.001.061.050.990.951.021.071.000.93AWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAMilkMilkSr-89Sr-901-131Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-I 37Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60pCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCi86.5ill25514712310515510625121895.121512295.188.711572.619317990.912425316212011215610225222492.619012289.884.111676.7189168AP Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60Charcoal 1-131Water Fe-55pCi 85.6 85.2pCi/L 1680 1810AE-1 TABLE E-1ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAMTELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 2 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)September2014 E10946E10947E10949E10948MilkMilkSr-89Sr-901-131Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-137Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60pCi/L 90.7 96.9pCi/L 14.0 16.4pCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCi92.011728114118613713816275.228697.821210613185.792.811353.220297.612628815819314314215873.029782.118810312693.092.310347.5193AP Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60Charcoal 1-131Water Fe-55pCi 83.9 89.8pCi/L 2010 17200.940.850.940.930.980.890.960.960.971.031.030.961.191.131.031.040.921.011.101.121.050.931.171.120.940.931.090.931.161.021.081.020.900.830.900.940.990.950.980.940.981.050.970.95AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAE10950E10951SoilDecember 2014 El 1078El1079MilkMilkCe-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-137Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60Sr-89Sr-901-131Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-137Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60pCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/gpCi/g0.2080.3980.2160.3980.1970.2420.2380.1170.4470.1860.4250.2330.3650.2110.2090.2330.1080.438pCi/L 85.7 95.7pCi/L 12.9 15.6pCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/LpCi/L85.920540215619412222018328722495.1219406164198130225175297235E-2 TABLE E-1ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAMTELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 3 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)December 2014 El 1081AP Ce-141Cr-51Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-58Mn-54Fe-59Zn-65Co-60Charcoal 131Water Fe-55pCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCipCi96.417173.199.057.510774.214411410219076.992.660.810581.61391100.950.900.951.070.951.020.911.041.040.950.89AAAAAAAAAAAEl 1080El 1082pCi 93.5 98.2pCi/L 1760 1970(a)(b)(C)(d)Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetnc and/orvolumetric measurements made during standard preparation.Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0. 80-1.20.W-Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0. 70-0 80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reportedresult falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30.E-3 TABLE E-2ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAMTELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 1 OF 1)Identification Reported Known AcceptanceMonth/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation (c)May 2014RAD-97MRAD-20Water Sr-89Sr-90Ba-1 33Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-60Zn-65Gr-AGr-B1-131U-NatH-3Filter Gr-AWater Sr-89Sr-90Ba-133Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-60Zn-65Gr-AGr-B1-131U-NatH-3Filter Gr-ApCi/L 38.25pCi/L 24.65pCi/L 89.1pCi/L 45.55pCi/L 91.15pCi/L 65.10pCi/L 244pCi/L 45.65pCi/L 27.95pCi/L 23.75pCi/L 9.61pCi/L 8435pCi/filter 28.0pCi/L 30.4pCi/L 18.6pCi/L 46.8pCi/L 88.0pCi/L 99.0pCi/L 92.5pCi/L 325pCi/L 29.9pCi/L 27.5pCi/L 15.8pCi/L 5.74pCi/L 6255pCi/filter 27.336.726.587.944.389.164.223561.033.025.710.2877027.5 -43.619.2-30.974.0 -96.735.5 -48.780.2- 10157.8 -73.1212 -27531.9 -75.821.4-40.721.3- 30.37.95- 11.87610-9650AAAAAAAAAAAAA46.0 15.4-71.4November 2014 RAD-9931.421.849.189.898.892.131037.627.420.35.80688022.8-38.115.6-25.740.3 -54.573.7 -98.888.9-11182.9- 104279 -36219.4-48.117.3-35.316.8-24.44.34 -6.965940 -7570AAAAAAAAAN(1)AAMRAD-2136.9 12.4- 57.3A(1) The Iodine-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of 0. 778. No cause could be found for the slighly low activity. TBE would evaluate this asacceptabile with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-131 decay. All ERA Iodine- 131 evaluations since 2004 havebeen acceptable. NCR 14-08(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/orvolumetric measurements made during standard preparation.(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result fallsoutside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.E-4 TABLE E-3DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 1 OF 2)Identification Reported Known AcceptanceMonth/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)March 2014 14-MaW3014-MaS30Water Am-241Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-57Co-60H-3**Mn-54Ni-63Pu-238Pu-239/240K-40Sr-90**U-234/233**U-238"*Zn-65Bq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kg0.76420.728.026.515.6NR13.5NR0.9110.751NRNRNRNR-0.2012.02130010691.3215106694.147630.72023.128.927.516.032113.934.00.8280.6768.510.2251.4512389661.2214306226950.504 -0.93616.2-30020.2 -37.619.3 -35.811.2-20.8225-4179.7- 18.123.8 -44.20.580 -1.0760.473 -0.879(1)5.96- 11.060.158 -0.2931.02-1.89(1)(1)867 -1609676 -1256(2)1001 -1859435 -809(1)487 -904SoilCs-134Cs-137Co-57Co-60Mn-54K-40Sr-90Zn-65AAAAAN(3)AN (3)N (3)N (3)N (3)N(3)AAAAAAAAAN (3)N (3)N(3)N (3)N (3)N (3)N (3)AA14-RdF3014-GrF3014-RdV30AP Cs-134**Cs-1 37"*Co-57"*Co-60**Mn-54**Sr-90Zn-65**AP Gr-AGr-BVegetation Cs-1 34Cs-1 37Co-57Co-60Mn-54Sr-90Zn-65Bq/sample NRBq/sample NRBq/sample NRBq/sample NRBq/sample NRBq/sample 0.8220Bq/sample NRBq/sample 0.606Bq/sample 0.7507Bq/sample 5.96Bq/sample 5.06Bq/sample 11.8Bq/sample 7.34Bq/sample 8.95Bq/sample 1.23Bq/sample 8.911.91 1.34 -2.481.76 1.23-2.29(1)1.39 0.97 -1.81(1)1.18 0.83-1.53(1)1.77 0.53-3.010.77 0.39-1.166.044.7410.16.938.621.467.864.23 -7.853.32-6.167.1 -13.14.85 -9.016.03 -11.211.02-1.905.50- 10.22AAAAAAAE-5 TABLE E-3DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014(PAGE 2 OF 2)Identification Reported Known AcceptanceMonth/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)September 2014 14-MaW3114-MaS31Water Am-241Cs-1 34***Cs-1 37***Co-57***Co-60"**Mn-54***Ni-63Pu-238Pu-239/240K-40*Zn-65***Bq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/LBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kgBq/kg0.705NRNRNRNRNR24.070.5910.0153NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR694NR0.88 0.62-1.14(1)18.4 12.9-23.924.7 17.3-32.112.4 8.7-16.114.0 9.8-18.224.6 17.2-32.00.618 0.433 -0.8030.0048 (2)161 113-20910.9 7.6- 14.2SoilCs-I 34***Cs-i 37~***Co-57***Co-60***Mn-54***K-40**'Sr-90Zn-65***62211167791009824858541435-809(1)781-1451545-1013706-1312577-1071601-1115379-703AN (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)AAAN (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)N (4)AN (4)N (4)N (4)A14-RdF3114-GrF31AP Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.310 0.703 0.492 -0.914September 2014 14-RdV31AP Gr-AGr-BVegetation Cs-134Cs-1 37Co-57Co-60Mn-54Sr-90Zn-65Bq/sampleBq/sampleBq/sampleBq/sampleBq/sampleBq/sampleBq/sample7.318.9310.86.317.760.7387.16Bq/sample 0.153 0.53 0.16-0.90Bq/sample 0.977 1.06 0.53- 1.597.388.149.26.117.100.856.425.17-9.595.70- 10.586.4- 12.04.28 -7.944.97 -9.230.60-1.114.49 -8.35AAAAAAA* The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients.These nuclides are no longer part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performedfor clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.All future gamma cross check samples for these isotopes will be provided by Analytics.(1) False positive test.(2) Sensitivity evaluation.(3) Water, Ni-63 overlooked when reporting, but the result of 32.7 +- 1.69 would have passed the acceptance criteria. NCR 14-04Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting, but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-04AP, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The original and rerun results were statistically the same. Nocause could be identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 14-04For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-04(4) AP, Sr-90 gravimetric yield was very high at 117%. Could indicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fumingHNO 3 separation would be required to remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09AP, Gr-Alpha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-09(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetnc and/orvolumetnic measurements made during standard preparation.(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.E-6 TABLE E-4ERA (a) STATISTICAL SUMMARY PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM'ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014(Page 1 of 1)Concentration (pCi/L)Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA ControlResult b Result c Limits AcceptanceERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-89 40.29 +/- 5.76 36.70 27.50 -43.60 PassERW-1384 04/07/14 Sr-90 24.08 +/- 2.35 26.50 19.20 -30.90 PassERW-1 385 04/07/14 Ba-1 33 78.23 +/- 3.93 87.90 74.00 -96.70 PassERW-1385 04/07/14 Co-60 62.75 +/- 3.53 64.20 57.80 -73.10 PassERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-134 44.97 +/- 3.99 44.30 35.50 -48.70 PassERW-1385 04/07/14 Cs-137 88.54 +/- 4.93 89.10 80.20 -101.00 PassERW-1385 04/07/14 Zn-65 249.1 +/- 10.44 235.0 212.0 -275.0 PassERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Alpha 56.70 +/- 2.47 61.00 31.90 -75.80 PassERW-1388 04/07/14 Gr. Beta 32.10 +/- 1.20 33.00 21.40 -40.70 PassERW-1391 04/07/14 1-131 25.52 +/- 1.12 25.70 21.30 -30.30 PassERW-1394 04/07/14 Uranium 10.76 +/- 0.74 10.20 7.95 -11.80 PassERW-1397 04/07/14 H-3 8982 +/- 279 8770 7610 -9650 PassERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-89 29.40 +/- 5.32 31.40 22.80 -38.10 PassERW-5382 10/06/14 Sr-90 19.19 +/- 1.85 21.80 15.60 -25.70 PassERW-5385 10/06/14 Ba-133 43.54 +/- 4.54 49.10 40.30 -54.50 PassERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-134 81.95 +/- 7.49 89.80 73.70 -98.80 PassERW-5385 10/06/14 Cs-137 95.76 +/- 5.50 98.80 88.90 -111.00 PassERW-5385 10/06/14 Co-60 90.25 +/- 2.77 92.10 82.90 -104.00 PassERW-5385 10/06/14 Zn-65 327.4 +/- 23.3 310.00 279.0 -362.0 PassERW-5388 10/06/14 Gr. Alpha 30.88 +/- 8.05 37.60 19.40 -46.10 PassERW-5388 10/06/14 G. Beta 20.47 +/- 4.75 27.40 17.30 -35.30 PassERW-5392 10/06/14 1-131 19.58 +/- 2.35 20.30 16.80 -24.40 PassERW-5394 10/06/14 Uranium 5.51 +/- 0.37 5.80 4.34 -6.96 PassERW-5397 10/06/14 H-3 6876 +/- 383 6880 5940 -7570 Passa Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiencytesting in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limitsas provided by ERA.E-7 TABLE E-5DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014(Page 1 of 2)Concentration aKnown ControlLab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c AcceptanceMAW-1140 02/01/14 Gr. AlphaMAW-1 140 02/01/14 Gr. BetaMAW-1184MAW-1184MAW-1 184MAW-1184MAW-1184MAW- 1184MAW-1 184MAW-1 184MAW-1 184MAW-1 184MAW-1 184MAW- 1184MAW-1 184MAW-1 184MAW-1184MAVE-i 148MAVE-i 148MAVE-1148MAVE-1148MAVE-1148MAVE-1148MAAP-1151MAAP-1 151MAAP-1 151MAAP-1 151MAAP-1151MAAP-1 151MAAP-1151MAAP-1 154MAAP-1 154MASO-1 146MASO-1 146MASO-1 146MASO-1 146MASO-1 146MASO-1146MASO-1 146MASO-1 146MASO-1 14602/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/1402/01/14Fe-55H-3Ni-63Pu-238Pu-239/240Sr-90U-233/234U-238Co-57Co-60Cs-134Cs-137K-40Mn-54Zn-65Co-57Co-60Cs-134Cs-1 37Mn-54Zn-650.77 +/- 0.064.31 +/- 0.080.40 +/- 3.20345.10 +/- 10.6032.40 +/- 3.201.28 +/- 0.120.91 + 0.107.00 +/- 0.700.20 +/- 0.071.25 +/- 0.1827.86 +/-15.99 +/-21.85 +/-28.74 +/-1.80. +/-14.06 +/-0.00 +/-11.63 +/-7.28 +/-6.29 +/-5.18 +/-9.22 +/-8.59 +/-1.60 +/-1.38 +1.75 +1.81 +/-0.01 +-0.24 *1.11 +0.380.270.540.492.000.400.190.190.180.290.200.260.400.050.080.110.100.030.090.140.854.190.00321.0034.000.830.688.510.231.4527.5016.0023.1028.900.0013.900.0010.106.936.044.748.627.86-0.01225.0023.800.580.475.960.161.0219.3011.2016.2020.200.009.70-0.017.104.854.233.326.035.500.26 -1.442.10 -6.29-2.00-417.00-44.20-1.08-0.88-11.06-0.29-1.89-35.80-20.80-30.00-37.60-10.00-18.10-0.00-13.10-9.01-7.85-6.16-11.21-10.22PassPassPassPassPassFail (1)Fail (1)PassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassFail (2)PassPassPassPassPassPassCo-57Co-60Cs-134Cs-137Mn-54Zn-65Sr-900.001.391.911.760.000.001.181.770.77NA0.97 -1.811.34 -2.481.23 -2.29NA-0.50 -1.000.83 -1.530.53 -3.010.39 -1.16Gr. AlphaGr. Beta0.56 +/- 0.060.98 +/- 0.06PassPassNi-63Co-57Co-60Cs-134Cs-137K-40Mn-54Zn-65Sr-904.80 +/-1064.50 +/-1.70 +/-6.10 +/-1364.30 +/-728.90 +/-1588.00 +/-763.50 +/-1.23 +/-15.303.600.501.805.3015.906.006.801.370.00966.001.220.001238.00622.001430.00695.000.00NA676.00 -1256.00(3)NA867.00 -1609.00435.00 -809.001001.00 -1859.00487.00 -904.00NAPassPassPassFail (4)PassPassPassPassPassE-8 TABLE E-5DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014(Page 2 of 2)Concentration aKnown ControlLab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c AcceptanceMASO-4439MASO-4439MASO-4439MASO-4439MASO-4439MASO-4439MASO-4439MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-4431MAW-443108/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/14Ni-63Sr-90Cs-134Co-57Co-60Mn-54Zn-65Am-241Cs-137Co-57Co-60H-3Fe-55Mn-54Zn-65771.62 +778.34 +520.60 +/-1135.00 +/-768.20 +/-1050.70 +/-407.89 +/-0.79 +/-18.62 +/-24.85 +/-12.27 +/-207.20 +/-55.10 +/-14.36 +/-11.46 +/-23.2917.827.097.407.7012.6015.030.080.540.420.3810.6014.800.530.78980.00858.00622.001116.00779.001009.00541.000.8818.4024.7012.40208.0031.5014.0010.901.406.50686.00601.00435.00781.00545.00706.00379.001274.001115.00809.001451.001013.001312.00703.000.62 -1.1412.90 -23.9017.308.70146.0022.109.807.6032.1016.10270.0041.0018.2014.20PassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassFail (5)PassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassPassMAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. AlphaMAW-4493 08/01/14 Gr. BetaMAAP-4433MAAP-4444MAAP-4444MAVE-4436MAVE-4436MAVE-4436MAVE-4436MAVE-443608/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/1408/01/14Sr-90Sr-89Sr-90Cs-134Co-57Co-60Mn-54Zn-650.93 +/- 0.076.31 +/- 1.350.74 +/- 0.107.82 +/- 0.520.76 +/- 0.107.49 +/- 0.1811.20 +/- 0.196.84 +/- 0.178.11 +/- 0.267.76 +/- 0.430.709.400.767.389.206.117.116.420.42 -2.383.25 -9.750.49 -0.916.60 -12.200.53 -0.995.176.404.284.974.499.5912.007.949.238.35a Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).b Laboratory codes as follows: MAW (water), MAAP (air filter), MASO (soil), MAVE (vegetation).MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) andcontrol limits as defined by the MAPEP. A known value of "zero" indicates an analysis was included in the testingseries as a "false positive". MAPEP does not provide control limits.(1) The high bias on the plutonium crosscheck samples was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard.The results of reanalysis with replacement tracer purchased from NIST:MAW-1184 Pu-238 0.68 +/- 0.10 Bq / LMAW-1184 Pu-239/240 0.66 + 0.10 Bq / L(2) Interference from Eu-1 52 resulted in misidentification of Co-57.(3) Provided in the series for "sensitivity evaluation". MAPEP does not provide control limits.(4) False positive test. Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occuring Bi-214 in sample matrixwith a close spectral energy.(5) Result of reanalysis Fe-55 32.63 +/- 16.30 Bq/LE-9 APPENDIX FERRATA DATA Corrections to the 2012 AREORThe value for direct radiation at station 113 for the second quarter is listed in thereport as 0.0 millirem/standard quarter since the dosimeters were attached to atelephone pole that was removed due to road construction. The value of 0.0millirem/standard quarter is correct, the error is that the 0.0 millirem/standardquarter value was used to determine the mean values in the following areas ofthe report:F-I Docket No: 50-219OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATIONUNIT 1Annual RadiologicalEnvironmental Operating Report1 January Through 31 December 2012Prepared ByTeledyne Brown EngineeringEnvironmental Services~ Exelon Generation,Oyster Creek Generating StationForked River, NJ 08731April 2013F-2 Original Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD), MEASUREMENTSVEGETATION(PCI/KG WET)LA- 140CS-134CS-137BA-140LA-140NA <LLD60 <LLD<LLD80 64.2(3/23)(61.5/67.8)NA <LLDNA <LLDNA 19.8(236/236)(0/27.6)NANANANA64.2(3/12)(61.5/67.8)115 INDICATOREAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM0.3 MILES E OF SITE00000DIRECT RADIATION(MILLIREM/STD.MO.)OSLD-QUARTERLY24420.6(8/8)(18.3/22.2)26.6(4/4)(25.5/27.6)55 INDICATOR 0SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE0.3 MILES W* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUESFRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

Corrected Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMARY FORTHE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2012INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTEDMEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTSVEGETATION(PCI/KG WET)LA-140CS-134CS-137BA-140LA-140NA <LLD60 <LLD80 64,2(3/23)(61.5/67.8)NA <LLDNA <LLDNA 19.9(236/236)(0/27.6)NANANANA0<LLD64.2(3/12)(61.5/67.8)115 INDICATOREAST OF SITE ON FINNINGER FARM0.3 MILES E OF SITE000DIRECT RADIATION(MILLIREM/STD.MO.)OSLD-QUARTERLY24420.6(8/8)(I8.3/22.2)26.6(4/4)(25.5/27.6)55 INDICATOR 0SOUTHERN AREA STORES SECURITY FENCE0.3 MILES W* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUESFRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

Original Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONSSTATION MEAN JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL -SEP OCT -DECCODE +/- 2 S.D.107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3113 15.7 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC-21 F-5 Corrected Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONSSTATION MEAN JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL -SEP OCT -DECCODE +/- 2 S.D.107 18.8 +/- 1.1 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 +/- 0.0 19.2 +/- 1.5109 19.9 +/- 2.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 3.0 19.2 +/- 0.6 21.0 +/- 0.3110 19.2 +/- 1.3 18.6 +/- 0.6 18.9 +/- 1.5 19.2 +/- 0.0 20.1 +/- 0.3112 22.1 +/- 1.7 21.3 +/- 3.9 21.3 +/- 0.9 22.8 +/- 2.4 22.8 +/- 0.3113 20.9 +/- 21.2 19.2 +/- 1.2 0.0 +/- 0.0 23.1 +/- 0.9 20.4 +/- 0.3(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONC-21 F-6 Original Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE C-IX.2MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY,INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTERCREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATACOLLECTIONPERIODSITE BOUNDARY+/-2 S.D.INTERMEDIATE SPECIAL INTERESTCONTROLJAN-MARAPR-JUNJUL-SEPOCT-DEC21.2 +/- 3.819.5 +/- 10.321.0 +/- 4.721.9 +/- 3.919.5 +/- 3.018.6 +/- 3.118.9 +/- 2.620.2 +/- 2.619.8 +/- 2.018.0 +/- 2.818.5 +/- 2.220.1 +/- 3.320.9 +/- 3.019.7 +/- 3.820.6 +/- 3.021.2 +/- 3.0TABLE C-IX.3SUMMARY OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATALOCATIONSAMPLES PERIOD PERIODANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUMPERIOD MEAN+/-2 S.D.SITE BOUNDARYINTERMEDIATESPECIAL INTERESTCONTROL75 0.0124 16.536 16.28 18.327.624.924.022.220.9 +/- 6.419.3 +/- 3.119.1 + 3.120.6 +/- 2.7SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS -1,112, 113, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61,62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TiINTERMEDIATE STATIONS -100, 101,102,103,104, 105, 106,107, 109, 110, 22, 4,46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS -11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92CONTROL STATIONS -14, CC-22 F-7 Corrected Page -Oyster Creek 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating ReportTABLE C-IX.2MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY,INTERMEDIATE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTERCREEK GENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATACOLLECTIONPERIODSITE BOUNDARY+/- 2 S.D.INTERMEDIATESPECIAL INTERESTCONTROLJAN-MARAPR-JUNJUL-SEPOCT-DEC21.2 +/- 3.820.6 +/- 10.321.0 +/- 4.721.9 +/- 3.919.5 +/- 3.018.6 +/- 3.118.9 +/- 2.620.2 +/- 2.619.8 +/- 2.018.0 +/- 2.818.5 +/- 2.220.1 +/- 3.320.9 +/- 3.019.7 +/- 3.820.6 +/- 3.021.2 +/- 3.0TABLE C-IX.3SUMMARY OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2012RESULTS IN UNITS OF MREM/STANDARD QUARTER +/- 2STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATALOCATIONSAMPLES PERIOD PERIODANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUMPERIOD MEAN+/-2 S.D.SITE BOUNDARYINTERMEDIATESPECIAL INTERESTCONTROL75 18.3124 16.536 16.28 18.327.624.924.022.221.2 +/- 6.419.3 +/- 3.119.1 +/- 3.120.6 +/- 2.7SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS -1,112,113, 51,52, 53,54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61,62, 63, 64, 65, 66, TIINTERMEDIATE STATIONS -100, 101,102,103,104,105,106, 107, 109, 110,22, 4,46, 47, 48, 5, 6, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 8, 82, 84, 85, 86, 9, 98, 99SPECIAL INTEREST STATIONS -11, 3, 71, 72, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92CONTROL STATIONS -14, CC-22 F-8 APPENDIX GANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATERPROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR)

Docket No: 50-219OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATIONUNIT 1Annual RadiologicalGroundwater Protection Program Report1 January Through 31 December 2014Prepared ByTeledyne Brown EngineeringEnvironmental Services,'" Exelon Generation.Oyster Creek Generating StationForked River, NJ 08731April 2015 Table of ContentsI. Sum m ary and Conclusions .............................................................................................. II1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3A. O bjectives of the RG PP .................................................................................. 4B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives .................................................................. 6C .Program Description ...................................................................................... 6D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3) ...................................................................... 7I1l. Program Description ................................................................................................ 7A. Sam ple Analysis .............................................................................................. 7B. Data Interpretation .......................................................................................... 8C. Background Analysis ..................................................................................... 9IV. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 11A .Program Exceptions ..................................................................................... 11B. G roundwater Results ..................................................................................... 12C .Surface W ater Results .................................................................................. 13D. Precipitation W ater Results ......................................................................... 14E. Summary of Results -Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ...................... 14F. Leaks, Spills, and Releases ........................................................................ 15G .Trends .......................................................................................................... 15H. Investigations ................................................................................................ 15I. Actions Taken ................................................................................................ 15V. References ................................................................................................................... 16 AppendicesAppendix ATablesTable A-1FiguresFigure A-1Location DesignationAppendix BTablesTable B-1.1Table B-1.2Table B-1.3Table B-11.1Table B-11.2Table B-11.3Table B-Ill.1Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Sampling locations -Selected Cohansey and Cape May FormationWells, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Security-Related Information: Detailed maps of the Oyster CreekGenerating Station have been withheld from public disclosure under 10CFR 2.390 and N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1Data TablesConcentrations of Tritium, Strontium, Gross Alpha and Gross Beta inGroundwater Samples Collected as Part of the RadiologicalGroundwater Protection Program, Oyster Creek Generating Station,2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collectedin the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Groundwater SamplesCollected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected as Partof the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water SamplesCollected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of "Hard-To-Detects" in Surface Water SamplesCollected as Part of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program,Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014.Concentrations of Tritium in Precipitation Water Samples Collected asPart of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, OysterCreek Generating Station, 2014.ii Summary and ConclusionsThis report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP)conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by ExelonGeneration Company LLC (Exelon) covers the period 01 January 2014 through31 December 2014.This report covers groundwater and surface water samples collected from theenvironment, both on and off station property in 2014. In 2014, 1,275 analyseswere performed on 498 samples from 63 locations.There were three inadvertent releases of contaminated water into thegroundwater during 2009. There is a plume located west of the turbine buildingand is monitored via a series of monitoring wells.Gamma-emitting radionuclide K-40 was detected in nine of the 54 groundwaterwell samples. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248 pCi/L. Potassium-40was detected in 264 of 266 surface water samples. The concentrations rangedfrom 89 to 580 pCi/L.In the case of tritium, Exelon specified that its laboratories achieve a lower limitof detection 100 times lower than the drinking water limit specified by the UnitedStates Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (200 pCi/I versus 20,000pCi/I).As expected, tritium was detected in groundwater samples. The 2014 Tritiumconcentrations varied from <200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with the highestconcentration was MW-561. The flow of groundwater is in the direction of theintake and discharge canals.No detectable tritium (greater than the MDC) was found in surface water orprecipitation samples collected from onsite and offsite monitoring locationsduring 2014.Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any groundwater samplesduring 2014.Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved and suspended fractionswere performed on groundwater samples during the second quarter sampling in2014.There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations. Gross Alpha(dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and ranged from 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. GrossAlpha (suspended) was detected in 20 samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1pCi/L. Gross Beta (dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to 29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samples and rangedfrom 1.8 to 215 pCi/L."Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group of groundwaterlocations. The analyses for groundwater included Fe-55, Ni-63, Am-241,Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234and U-238 were detected in three of eight samples. The concentrations ofU-234 and U-238 ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L,respectively. All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC.Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected and are consideredbackground.

II. IntroductionThe Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station consists of a single boiling waterreactor (BWR) and turbine generator capable of producing 650 megawatts ofelectricity. The Station operates under Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)renewed facility operating license number DPR-16. Brackish water fromBarnegat Bay is supplied to the circulating water system. The circulating watersystem is designed to supply a continuous flow of water from Barnegat Baythrough the plant to remove the waste heat released by the power cycle in theMain Condenser. The circulating water system is comprised of the intake canalfrom Barnegat Bay to the plant, the Main Condenser Circulating Water System,the dilution plant, and the discharge canal to Barnegat Bay. The dilution plantportion of the system minimizes the adverse effects of hot discharge water onaquatic life in the discharge canal and Barnegat Bay to meet the conditions ofthe Oyster Creek New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination system (NJPDES)Permit No. NJ0005550. Approximately 1 million gallons per minute of water arewithdrawn from the intake canal for dilution and station use and returned to thedischarge canal.The Station is located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province.Topography in the region of the Station is a slightly undulating coastal plainhaving low relief. The land surface gradually rises from sea level at BarnegatBay, which is located east of the Station, to approximately 50 feet above meansea level (AMSL) 2 miles inland. This region of the coastal plain has numeroustidal marshes and is incised by easterly flowing streams and creeks. Elevationsat the Station property west of Route 9 range from approximately 0 to 15 feetAMSL immediately adjacent to the intake and discharge canals to slightly morethan 30 feet AMSL in the northwest portion of the Station property. The132-acre developed portion of the Site located within the "horseshoe" formed bythe intake and discharge canals west of Route 9 has an approximate averageelevation of 20 feet AMSL. In the immediate vicinity of the intake and dischargecanals, the Station property slopes steeply down to the canal. The averageelevation of the surface water level in the intake and discharge canals isapproximately 1-foot AMSL. The remaining 637-acre portion of the Stationlocated east of Route 9 is primarily vegetated and undeveloped. The groundsurface is relatively level except for the steep slopes at areas adjacent to theintake and discharge canals.The three shallowest stratigraphic units in the vicinity of the Oyster Creek area indescending order are the Cape May Formation, the Cohansey Formation, andthe Kirkwood Formation. Some of the Station structures are constructed todepths of approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs). Excavations werecompleted from grade, through the fill, Cape May Formation, Upper Clay, andinto the Cohansey Formation during construction. Consequently, the bottoms of some Station structures are completed within the Cohansey Formation and somestructures breach the Upper Clay.The Cape May Formation regionally has an average thickness of 40 feet and atOCGS, the Cape May is described as a light gray to tan, medium- to fine-grainedsand, with trace to some silt and occasional coarse sand. It is generally poorlycompacted. The Cape May Formation varies from 0 to 21 feet in thicknessbased on historical boring logs. The variation principally is due to the varyingamount of material excavated and replaced by fill during Station construction.When present, the thickness of the Cape May generally ranges from15 to 20 feet thick. The base of the Cape May generally is defined by thepresence of a dark clay unit referred to as the Upper Clay unit. The Upper Clay isa stiff to hard, gray, plastic organic clay containing inclusions (also described aslenses or partings) of dense fine sand with trace to some organic silt. Thedeposits of fine sand within the Upper Clay layer have high relative densities andoccur as lenses or inclusions.The Cohansey Formation is primarily composed of a light-colored, fine- to verycoarse-grained quartzose sand with lenses of silt and clay. Although mostborings at the Station do not penetrate the entire Cohansey Formation, thisformation appears to be approximately 60 to 80 feet thick at OCGS. A claysequence, referred to at the Station as the "Lower Clay", marks the base of theCohansey, which generally is present to approximately 90 to 100 feet bgs. Thelower clay is a dense gray medium- to fine-grained sand containing trace tosome organic silt and layers or inclusions of very stiff to hard gray organic clay.The thickness of the lower clay is estimated to be approximately 10 to 20 feet inthe vicinity of OCGS.The Cohansey Formation is underlain by the Kirkwood Formation which consistsof several stratigraphic units. The Kirkwood Formation is described as amedium- to fine-grained sand with trace silt. The thickness of this formationbeneath the Station is unknown. The south domestic supply well terminates inthe Kirkwood at a depth of 310 feet bgs. The Kirkwood thickness in OceanCounty ranges from approximately 300 to 400 feet.This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering(TBE) and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected in 2014.A. Objectives of the RGPPThe long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows:* Ensure that the site characterization of geology and hydrologyprovides an understanding of predominant ground water gradientsbased upon current site conditions.

" Identify site risk based on plant design and work practices." Evaluate all SSCs that contain or could contain licensed materialand for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensedmaterial to reach groundwater." Evaluate work practices that involve licensed material and for whichthere is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reachgroundwater." Perform on-site monitoring to ensure timely detection of inadvertentradiological releases to ground water." Understand background concentrations of radioactive analytesoutside of the REMP, as required." Evaluate return/re-use of previously discharged radioactiveeffluents in gaseous or liquid effluents that are returned from theenvironment to the operating nuclear power facility." Ensure controls are established for the selection, installation andretirement of monitoring wells." Perform remediation protocols to prevent migration of licensedmaterial off-site and to minimize decommissioning impacts." Ensure that records of leaks, spills, remediation efforts are retainedand retrievable to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(g)." Ensure periodic communications are held on the RGPP with thedesignated State/Local officials." Ensure timely verbal and written reporting occurs if there is aninadvertent release of licensed materials to the soil, groundwater orsurface water." Document and report all applicable RGPP data." Identify and resolve deficiencies via the Corrective Action Processas delineated in PI-AA-120 "Issue Identification and ScreeningProcess"." Perform program oversight to ensure effective implementation ofthe voluntary RGPP.

B. Implementation of the ObjectivesThe objectives identified have been implemented at the Oyster CreekGenerating Station through compliance with approved procedures EN-AA-408-4000, Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Implementationand site specific procedure EN-OC-408-4160, RGPP Reference Materialfor Oyster Creek Generating Station.C. Program DescriptionSamples for the OCGS site were collected for Exelon by on-site personneland Normandeau Associates, Inc. This section describes the generalcollection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGSRGPP in 2014. Sample locations can be found in Table A-i, Appendix A.1. Sample CollectionSamples of water are collected, managed, transported andanalyzed in accordance with approved procedures. Bothgroundwater and surface water are collected. Sample locations,sample collection frequencies and analytical frequencies arecontrolled in accordance with approved station procedures.Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection,preservation management, and shipment of samples, as well as indocumentation of sampling events.2. Sample AnalysisSamples are analyzed in accordance with approved proceduresthat are based on industry standards.3. Quality ControlAnalytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assuranceprograms, industry cross-check programs, nuclear industry audits,as well as being certified by the State of New Jersey.4. Data InterpretationStation personnel review and evaluate all analytical datadeliverables as data is received. Analytical data results arereviewed by both station personnel and independent consultants,including a hydrogeologist, for adverse trends or changes tohydrogeologic conditions.

D. Characteristics of Tritium (H-3)Tritium (chemical symbol H-3) is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. Themost common form of tritium is tritium oxide, which is also called "tritiatedwater." The chemical properties of tritium are essentially those of ordinaryhydrogen.Tritiated water behaves the same as ordinary water in both theenvironment and the body. Tritium can be taken into the body by drinkingwater, breathing air, eating food, or absorption through the skin. Oncetritium enters the body, it disperses quickly and is uniformly distributedthroughout the body. Tritium is excreted primarily through urine with aclearance rate characterized by an effective biological half-life of about 10days.Tritium is produced naturally in the upper atmosphere when cosmic raysstrike air molecules. Tritium is also produced during nuclear weaponsexplosions, as a by-product in reactors producing electricity, and in specialproduction reactors. Also, tritium was released into the atmosphere fromChernobyl in 1986. Like normal water, tritiated water is colorless andodorless. Tritiated water behaves chemically and physically like non-tritiated water in the subsurface, and therefore tritiated water will travel atthe same velocity as the average groundwater velocity.Tritium has a half-life of approximately 12.3 years. It decaysspontaneously to helium-3 (He-3). This radioactive decay releases a betaparticle (18.6 keV low-energy electron). The radioactive decay of tritium isthe source of the health risk from exposure to tritium. Tritium is one of theleast dangerous radionuclides because it emits very weak radiation andleaves the body relatively quickly. Since tritium is almost always found aswater, it goes directly into soft tissues and organs. The associated dose tothese tissues is generally uniform and is dependent on the water contentof the specific tissue.Ill. Program DescriptionA. Sample AnalysisThis section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBEto analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the OysterCreek Generating Station RGPP in 2014. The sampling frequencies areincreased if activity is detected.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes thefollowing analyses for groundwater, surface water, and precipitation water:1. Gamma emitters2. Strontium-89 and Strontium-903. Tritium4. Gross Alpha, Dissolved and Suspended and Gross Beta, Dissolvedand Suspended5. Selected transuranics6. Fe-557. Ni-63B. Data InterpretationThe radiological data collected prior to Oyster Creek Generating Stationbecoming operational, as well as background data from publicly availabledatabases, were used as a baseline with which these operational datawere compared. For the purpose of this report, Oyster Creek GeneratingStation was considered operational at initial criticality. Several factorswere important in the interpretation of the data:1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable ConcentrationThe lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallestconcentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield anet count (above background) that would be detected with only a5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observationrepresents a "real" signal. The LLD is intended as a before the factestimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure andsample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presenceof activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the requiredOCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined as thesmallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample thatwould yield a net count (above background) that would be detectedwith only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blankobservation represents a "real" signal as an after the fact estimateof the presence of activity.

2. Laboratory Measurements UncertaintyThe estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium inenvironmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of themeasurement value.Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as arange with a stated level of confidence. The convention is to reportresults with a 95% level of confidence. The uncertainty comesfrom calibration standards, sample volume or weightmeasurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelonreports the uncertainty of a measurement created by statisticalprocess (counting error) as well as all sources of error (TotalPropagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two valuescalculated. Exelon reports the TPU by following the result with plusor minus (+/-) the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, thatis obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty inmeasurements.Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level.C. Background Analysis1 .Background Concentrations of TritiumThe purpose of the following discussion is to summarizebackground measurements of tritium in various media performedby others. Additional detail may be found by consulting references.a. Tritium ProductionTritium is created in the environment from naturally occurringprocesses both cosmic and subterranean, as well as fromanthropogenic (i.e., man-made) sources. In the upperatmosphere, "cosmogenic" tritium is produced from thebombardment of stable nuclides and combines with oxygento form tritiated water, which will then enter the hydrologiccycle. Below ground, "lithogenic" tritium is produced by thebombardment of natural lithium present in crystalline rocksby neutrons produced by the radioactive decay of naturallyabundant uranium and thorium. Lithogenic production oftritium is usually negligible compared to other sources due tothe limited abundance of lithium in rock. The lithogenictritium is introduced directly to groundwater.

A major anthropogenic source of tritium and strontium-90comes from the former atmospheric testing of thermonuclearweapons. Levels of tritium in precipitation increasedsignificantly during the 1950s and peaked in 1963 with thesigning of the limited test ban treaty. The Canadian heavywater nuclear power reactors, other commercial powerreactors, nuclear research and weapons production continueto influence tritium concentrations in the environment. Also,tritium was released into the atmosphere from Chernobyl in1986.b. Precipitation DataPrecipitation samples are routinely collected at stationsaround the world for the analysis of tritium and otherradionuclides. One publicly available database that providestritium concentrations in precipitation is the USEPA'sRadNet database. RadNet provides tritium precipitationconcentration data for samples collected at stationsthroughout the U.S. from 1978 up to and including 1996.Tritium concentrations in precipitation in New Jersey from1978 through 1996 have ranged from 600 pCi/I in 1979 to 0pCi/I in 1996, with an average of 185 pCi/I. Tritiumconcentrations in wells may still be above the 200 pCi/Idetection limit from the external causes described above.Water from previous years and decades is naturallycaptured in groundwater, so some well water sources todayare affected by the surface water from the 1960s that waselevated in tritium.c. Surface Water DataTritium concentrations are routinely measured in surfacewater bodies, including Oyster Creek and the DelawareRiver. New Jersey surface water data between 1978 and1998 averaged 185 pCi/I.The USEPA RadNet surface water data typically has areported 'Combined Standard Uncertainty' of 2 standarddeviations. This corresponds to a +/- 36 to +/-100 pCi/Iconfidence bound on each given reported measurement sothat the typical surface water background data provided byRadNet may be subject to measurement uncertainty of up to100 pCi/I.

The radio-analytical laboratory counts tritium results to anExelon specified LLD of 200 pCi/I with a typical uncertaintyof +/-100 pCi/I. Therefore, sample results reported by TBEnear this LLD can not be distinguished from naturalbackground concentrations in surface water.IV. Results and DiscussionA. Program Exceptions1. Sample AnomaliesThere are no sample anomalies in 2014.2. Missed SamplesExelon maintains a Radiological Groundwater Protection Program(RGPP) as part of the nuclear industry's voluntary groundwaterprotection initiative as described in NEI 07-07. As part of this program,samples are obtained routinely from monitoring wells and surfacewaters at Oyster Creek based on the frequencies outlined in stationprocedures. The following samples were not obtained as required byprocedure:MW-51-Tritium, monthly-Gamma, semi-annually-Gross alpha, annually-Gross beta, annually-Select transuranics, annually-Iron-55, annually-Nickel-63, annually-Strontium-89, annually-Strontium-90, annuallyImmediate actions taken:MW-51 was dry 12 out of 12 months during sampling events. MW-51is checked for water each sampling event and no additional actionsare required.

3. LLDs Not MetRequired LLDs for Surface and GroundwaterIsotope pCi/literH-3 200Mn-54 15Co-58 15Fe-59 30Co-60 15Zn-65 30Nb-95 15Zr-95 301-131 15Cs-134 15Cs-137 18Ba-140 60La-140 15Pu-241 50Fe-55 200Ni-63 5Sr-89 10Sr-90 1Gross Alpha (diss) 3Gross Alpha (susp) 10Gross Beta (diss) 4Gross Beta (susp) 4Transuranics 0.2Indicated LLDs for shorter lived radionuclides were not met due to atime lag between taking the samples and analyzing the samples asindicated on table B-1.2 and B-11.2.B. Groundwater ResultsSamples were collected from on-site locations in accordance withthe station radiological groundwater protection program. Asreported in CRA's 2011 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report,groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Torus Water Storage Tankand the Condensate Storage Tank is towards the intake anddischarge canals.TritiumSamples from 54 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1, Appendix B). Tritium was detected in 29 of 209 samples.The values ranged from < 200 to 26,835 pCi/I. The well with thehighest concentration was MW-561 (Table B-1.1, Appendix B).StrontiumStrontium-89 and strontium-90 were not detected in any locationsampled in 2014. (Table B-1.1, Appendix B)Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended)Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved andsuspended fractions were performed on groundwater samplesduring the second sampling in 2014.There were 48 samples taken from 43 groundwater well locations.Gross Alpha (dissolved) was detected in 11 samples and rangedfrom 0.4 to 4.7 pCi/L. Gross Alpha (suspended) was detected in 20samples and ranged from 1.4 to 29.1 pCi/L. Gross Beta(dissolved) was detected in 41 samples and ranged from 1.6 to29.4 pCi/L. Gross Beta (suspended) was detected in 22 samplesand ranged from 1.8 to 215 pCi/L.Gamma EmittersGamma emitting nuclide K-40 was detected in nine of 54 samplesanalyzed during 2014. The concentrations ranged from 35 to 248pCi/L. (Table B-1.2, Appendix B)."Hard-To-Detect""Hard-To-Detect" analyses were performed on a select group ofgroundwater locations. The analyses for groundwater includedFe-55, Ni-63, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243/244, Pu-238, Pu-239/240,U-234, U-235, and U-238. U-234 and U-238 were detected inthree of eight samples. The concentrations of U-234 and U-238ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 pCi/L and 0.13 to 1.30 pCi/L, respectively.All other Hard-To-Detect analyses were less than the MDC.Occasionally the isotopes of U-234 and U-238 are detected andare considered background (Table B-1.3, Appendix B).C. Surface Water ResultsSamples were collected from on-site locations in accordance withthe station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.TritiumSamples from 4 locations were analyzed for tritium activity (TableB-11.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD)was found in any surface water samples collected from onsite andoffsite monitoring locations.Gross Alpha and Gross Beta (dissolved and suspended)Gross Alpha and Gross Beta analyses in the dissolved andsuspended fractions are not required on a routine basis and werenot analyzed in 2014.Gamma EmittersGamma emitting nuclide, naturally occurring potassium-40, wasdetected in 264 of 266 samples analyzed. The concentrationsranged from 89 to 580 pCi/L. (Table B-11.2, Appendix B)"Hard-To-Detect""Hard-To-Detect" analyses are not required on a routine basis andwere not analyzed in 2014.D. Precipitation Water ResultsPrecipitation samples were collected from onsite and offsitelocations in accordance with the station radiological groundwaterprotection program. Analytical results and anomalies arediscussed below.TritiumSamples from five locations were analyzed for tritium activity (TableB-Ill.1, Appendix B). No detectable tritium (greater than the LLD)was found in any precipitation water samples collected from onsiteand offsite monitoring locations.E. Summary of Results -Inter-Laboratory Comparison ProgramInter-Laboratory Comparison Program results for TBE and EnvironmentalInc. (Midwest Labs) are presented in the 2014 Oyster Creek AREOR.

This report is part of the AREOR.F. Leaks, Spills, and ReleasesThere were no abnormal liquid releases during 2014.G. TrendsActive remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills that occurredin 2009 was initiated in October 2010. Trending of the data due to activeremediation is on-going. Overall, the station has seen a decreasing trendin tritium values.H. InvestigationsConestoga Rovers and Associates performed an independentassessment of the tritium plume. The results of their assessment can befound in References 1, 2 and 3.I. Actions Taken1. Compensatory ActionsActive remediation of tritium in groundwater due to the spills thatoccurred in 2009 was initiated in October, 2010.2. Installation of Monitoring WellsThe following wells were installed in 2010 to better characterize andmonitor the tritium plume and site hydrology.Well Number Formation Well Installation DateW-581 Cohansey JulyW-591 Cohansey MarchW-601 Cohansey JulyW-61 I Cohansey JulyW-62 Cape May MarchW-631 Cohansey JulyW-64 Cape May MarchW-65 Cape May MarchW-661 Cohansey JulyWell Number Formation Well Installation DateW-67 Cape May MarchW-681 Cohansey JulyW-691 Cohansey July15-W-701 Cohansey JulyW-71 Cape May AugustW-72 Cape May AugustW-73Pumping well Cohansey October3. Actions to Recover/Reverse PlumesOyster Creek Generating Station is currently addressing the tritium ingroundwater through pumping of groundwater out of W-73 into theintake structure.V. References1. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Hydrogeologic Investigation Report,Fleetwide Assessment, Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, NewJersey, Ref. No. 055875 (6), April 20112. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Site Investigation Report, Oyster CreekGenerating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (4), August20093. Conestoga Rovers and Associates, Remedial Investigation Workplan, OysterCreek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey, Ref. No. 055875 (5),October 2009 APPENDIX ALOCATION DESIGNATION TABLE A-1:Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListSample Well GPS RGPP Tritium Aquifer orIdentification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Alert WaterNumber (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Value BodyDesignation MonitoredNorth 35837333 2000DWN Domestic 574672.98 300.0 B p2i/L KirkwoodWellSouthDWS Domestic 356955.90 145.0 B 2,000 KirkwoodWel574616.69 pCi/'LWellE of ISFSILW-- 357632.49 21.0 2,000 Cape May(microwave 575569.96 pCi/Lzone)E of ISFSILW-2 357645.30 21.0 2,000 Cape May(microwave 575581.92 pCi/Lzone)E of ISFSI357630.20 21.0 D 2000 Cape MayLW-3 (microwave 575575.52 pCi/Lzone)East ofLW-4 ISFSI -357652.78 49.0 D 2,000 Cohansey(microwave 575573.75 pCi/Lzone)SW of 357380.76 2000MW-1A-2A MFOT 575043.44 24.0 D Cape MayMoatEast ofMW-1G-1A fueling 358551.94 20.0 2,000 Cape Maystation 575308.91 pCi/L358550.57 45.0 2,000East of ChneMW-1G-1B fueling 575316.19 pCi/L CohanseystationRoadway- 357598.17 2,000MW-1i-1A NW of 574412.70 pi/L Cape MayTWSTRoadway -357574.80 2,000MW-1i -2A SE of 574493.50 17.5 D pCi/L Cape MayTWSTIntak 57449.50 9.0 D2,000MaMW-15K-1A Roadway -357297.90 19.0 D Cape MayIntake 574469.50 pCi/LYard-W 357573.30 2,000MW-16D of MAC 574746.50 25.0 D P&L Cape MayBuildingA-1 TABLE A-1 :Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWell GPS RGPP Aquifer orSample CoodiatS Depth Sample TritiumIdentification Location Coordinates (ft) Point Alert WaterNumber (Northing/Easting) Desint Value BodyNum rDesignation V e MonitoredFinninger 2000MW-24-2A Farm -356838.52 18.0 Cape Maynear DSB 579470.94 pCi/LFinninger 356828.49 2,000MW-24-3A Farm -17.0 1 pCi/L Cape Maynear DSB 578969.05MainMCD Condenser N/A N/A Weekly* H-3 2,000 SurfaceDischarge pCi/L WaterIntake SW/Weekly* 2,000 SurfaceCanal H-3 pCi/L WaterRT 9 2,000 SurfaceSW-2 South N/A N/A SW pCi/L2 WaterBridgeSW-3 Fire Pond N/A N/A SW 2,000 SurfacepCi/L WaterDilutionW-1 Pump 357029.86 50.0 2,000 CohanseyArea -574140.61 pCi/LWest BankNorth Yard 358311.70 50.0 2,000 CohanseyW-1A Area 574679.00 pCi/LW-1 B North Yard 358312.80 20.0 2000 Cape MayArea 574685.40 p2i/LWest end 357149.22 60.0 2,000W-lC of backsite 572741.00 pCi/L CohanseyW-1 K West end 357151.55 150.0 2,000 Kirkwoodof backsite 572728.77 pCi/LW-2 S of EDG 356965.65 57.0 2,000 CohanseyBldg 574555.73 pCi/LField-W 358105.00 5.000W-2A of North 578105.60 50.0 2,000 CohanseyYard Bldg 574348.60A-2 TABLE A-1:Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWell GPS Tt Aquifer orSample Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium WaterIdentification Location (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert BodyNumber Designation Value MonitoredField -W of 358110.302,000W-2B North Yard 574348.50 20.0 B pCi/L Cape MayBuildingForked 357923.67 60.0 2,000W-2C River CT 57389.92pei/Site 573809.92 pCi/LForked 358030.88 150.0 2,000 KirkwoodW-2K River CT 573762.54 pCi/LSiteIntake -73.00 24.0 2,000W-3 Access 574499.10 D pCi/L Cape MayRoadPlant 358067.92 50.0 2,000 CohanseyW-3A Access 575664.22 pCi/LRoadPlant 358070.582,000W-3B Access 575656.25 20.0 1 pCi/LRoadFinninger 356595.30 60.0 2,000W-3C Farm -N of 576663.33 pCi/L CohanseyDischargeFinninger 356602.17 2,000W-3K Farm -N of 100.0 KirkwoodDshre 576675.04 pCi/LDischargeIntake -357176.40 2,000W-4 Access 574497.70 55.0 D P611- CohanseyRoadSE of 356913.30W-4A OCAB 575387.10 50.0 B p20i/L ohanseyBuildingSE of2,0W-4B OCAB 356916.40 2,000Building 575388.90 20.0 B pCi/L Cape MayFinninger 359305.61 60.0 2,000W-4C Farm -S of 575867.58 pCi/L CohanseyIntakeFinninger 359321.83 2,000W-4K Farm -S of 575874.07 100.00 pCi/L KirkwoodIntakeA-3 TABLE A-1:Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWelllePWeDepth RGPP Aquifer orSample CoordinatS Det Sample WateruIdentification Location Coordinates WaterNumber (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert BodyDesignation Value Monitored*NW Yardarea, near 357510.95 2,000 Cape MayFire Water 574374.05 pCi/LTankFinningerFarm -E 356758.59 60.0 B 2,000 Cohanseyof dredge 580642.26 pCi/LspoilsFinningerW-5K Farm -E 356743.81 150.0 B 2,000 Kirkwoodof dredge 580646.48 p1KLdspoilsNW Yard -W-6 near Fire 357514.02 52.0 D 2,000 CohanseyWater 574373.77 p5i/L2CohaneTankW-7 NE -357074.46 20.0 D 2000 Cape MayBuilding 4 574713.08 pCi/LRoadway- 357289.29 2000W-9 NE of SAS 574892.74 20.0 Dp2i/L,BuildingW-10 NW of SAS 357286.29 60.0 D 2,000 CohanseyBuilding 574890.61 pCi/LYard-NW 357669.10 2,000W-12 of DWPC 574755.60 20.0pCi/L Cape MayBuildingYard -NW 357666.00 2000W-13 of DWPC 574755.90 50.0 D pCi/L CohanseyBuildingYard -SW 357702.41Warehouse 575018.75 53.0 0 pCi/L CohanseyWarehouseYard -Sw 357705.83 2,000DCape MayW-15 of 575017.70 pCi/LWarehouseW-16 Yard -E of 357967.26 20.0 D 2000 Cape MayLLRW 574933.03 pCi/LW-17 Road/ Exit 358078.05 150.0 1 2,000 KirkwoodNear W-3A 575667.14 pCi/LA-4 TABLE A-1 :Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWell GPS RGPP Aquifer orSample ation Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium WaterIdentification Lcto oriae aeNumber (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert BodyDesignation Value MonitoredNear200ICpMaNear 357005.78 2,000W-18 EDG 574621.6 20.0 1piL Cape MayBuilding pCi/LNear 357077.91 2,000W-19 EDG 574633.23 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape MayBuildingSW of 356927.46 2,000W-20 EDG 574542.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape MayBuildingNear 2,000W-21 EDG 357009.15 20.0 1 2,000 Cape MayBuilding 574518.22pi/BuildingNear2,0NEDG 357024.50 2,000 Cape MayW-22 Building 574590.19 39.0 1 pCi/LNear 357054.89 2,000W-23 EDG 57454.88 20.0 1 p Cape MayBuilding 574564.88 pCi/LSouth ofTBW-24 Wof old 357128.94 2,000Machine 574650.77 19.0 D pCi/L Cape MayShopNear 356962.59 2,000W-25 EDG 574677.59 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape MayBuildingNear 357006.60 2,000W-26 EDG 574644.03 20.0 1 pCi/L Cape MayBuildingNear 357042.43 2,000W-27 EDG 574636.35 20.0 1 pCiIL Cape MayBuildingNear 356991.292000W-28 EDG 574573.64 19.5 Cape MayBuilding 574573CapepMayNear 357012.62 2,000W-29 EDG 574568.69 19.5 1 pCi/L Cape MayBuildingNear 357058.00 2,000W-30 EDG 574516.71 19.52 Cape MayBuildingA-5 TABLE A-1:Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWell GPS RGPP Aquifer orSample Coodiats Depth Sample TritiumIdentification LocationWaterIdnumbera Lo(NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Alert BodyNumber Designation Value MonitoredNear EDG 357051.78 2,000W-31 Building 574495.62 pCi/LW-32 Near EDG 356978.58 19.5 1 2,00 Cape MayBuilding 574528.44 pCi/LW-33 Near EDG 357026.93 19.5 2000 Cape MayBuilding 574499.17 pCi/LSouth ofTBTB 3719.142,000W-34 W of old 357196.14 40.0 pi/L CohanseyMachine 574649.43 42, C nShopBetweenMW-50 CST and 357368.21 20.0 E2000 Cape MayIntake 574436.80 pCi/LStructureMW-Si Near CST 357378.30 20.0 E 2,000 Cape May574480.80 pCi/LNearNear 35740.902,000MW-52 Intake 357400.90 20.0 D 2,000 Cape MayStructure 574353.00 pCi/LNear endof CW 357272.80 20.0 2000 Cape MayMW-53 discharge 574447.60 pCi/LpipingNear 357276.20MW-54 Intake 574311.70 20.0 E 2,000 Cape MayStructure pCi/LBetweenMW-55 CST and 357354.88 30.0 2000 Cape MayIntake 574440.07 pCi/LStructureMW-561 By NaOCI 357305.30 52.0 Cohanseytanks 574465.50 pCi/LNearNear 35733.712,000MW-571 Intake 357343.71 50.0 pCi/L CohanseyStructure 674373.89 pElaNearNear 35736.702,000MW-581 Intake 357346.70 72.0 D pCi/L CohanseyStructure 574377.28 7DhnA-6 TABLE A-1 :Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListWell GPS RGPP Aquifer orSample WelGS Depth Sample Tritiumidentification Location Coordinates Deth Sampl Art WaterNumber (Northing/Easting) (ft) Point Alert BodyrDesignation Value MonitoredIntakeMW-591 Roadway 357422.14 44.0 D 2,000 Cohansey-NW of 574406.38 pCi/LCSTNear 357346.55MW-601 Intake 574373.88 92.0 D 2,000Structure pCi/L CohanseyBetweenMW-611 CST and 357328.64 72.0 E 2,000Intake 574444.45 pCiIL CohanseyStructureNWMW-62 Corner of 357467.93 25.0 D Cape MayTurbine 574524.10 pCi/LBldgBetweenMW-631 CST and 357329.40 92.0 D 2000 CohanseyIntake 574447.67 pCi/LStructureNearMW-64 Intake 357343.96 2,000Structure 574377.88 25.0 E pCi/L Cape MayIntakeMW-65 Roadway 357421.00 2000-NW of 574402.55 25.0 D p2i/L Cape MayCSTSE of 357320.44MW-661 Reactor 574889.18 80.0 D 2,000Bldg pCi/L CohanseyWest side 357401.99MW-67 of Turbine 574540.38 25.0 E 2,000 Cape MayBldg 574540CapepMaySE of 357323.83MW-681 Reactor 574897.64 100.0 D 2,000Bldg pCi/L CohanseyYard -NW of 357664.03 78.0 D 2,000MW-691 DWPC 574760.93 pCi/L CohanseyBuildingYard -MW-701 NW of 357670.57 98.0 D 2,000DWPC 574759.18 pCi/L CohanseyBuildingS of 357365.52MW-71 Reactor 574841.89 25.0 D 2,000 Cape MayBldg p7I41 Cae/aA-7 TABLE A-1:Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2014Oyster Creek Generating Station RGPP Sample Point ListSample Well GPS RGPP Aquifer orIdentification Location Coordinates Depth Sample Tritium WaterNumber (NorthinglEasting) (ft) Point Alert BodyDesignation Value MonitoredMW-72 N of Reactor 357549.87 25.0 DCape MayBldg 574788.52 pCi/LMW-73 Remediation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASystem* Tritium sampling frequency based upon agreement made with the NJDEP on 4/26/13.D = DailyW = WeeklyM = MonthlyS = Semi-annualB = BiennialA-8 u-i,.~%m~ 3/4/W.I9.~~jW~IK ZI OF BRIDGE"ýwkFigure A-1Sampling Locations -Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 2014A-9 Figure A-1Sampling Locations -Selected Cohansey and Cape May Formation Wells, Oyster CreekGenerating Station, 2014A-10 APPENDIX BDATA TABLES TABLE B-I.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICALGROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONDATESITEH-3Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)UWNDWSLW-3LW-3LW-3LW-3LW-3LW-3LW-4LW-4LW-4LW-4MW-15K-1AMW-15K-lAMW-15K-1AMW-15K-1AMW-16DMW-16DMW-16DMW-16DMW-IA-2AMW-iA-2AMW-1A-2AMW-IA-2AMW-11-1AMW-11-1AMW-11-1AMW-11-1iAMW-1 I-2AMW-1 I-2AMW-1 I-2AMW-1 I-2AMW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-50MW-52MW-52MW-52MW-52MW-53MW-53MW-53MW-53MW-53MW-53MW-54MW-54MW-540410911404/09/1401/15/1404/10/1407/17/1410/17/1410/17/1410/17/1401/15/1404/10/1407/17/1410/17/1401/13/1404/09/1407/15/1410/14/1401/15/1404/08/1407/22/1410/15/1401/15/1404/11/1407/22/1410/15/1401/15/1404/08/1407/21/1410/15/1401/15/1404/08/1407/21/1410/15/1401/14/1401/14/1401/14/1404/08/1404/08/1404/08/1407/15/1407/15/1407/15/1410/14/1401/14/1404/09/1407/16/1410/13/1401/15/1401/15/1401/15/1404/10/1407/17/1410/14/1401/14/1404/09/1407/16/14TBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIML< 191* 189* 183* 175* 191* 157* 151* 150* 172* 173* 194* 159* 199* 195* 153* 176* 183* 177* 156* 172* 178* 176* 153* 191* 180* 174* 151* 174* 180* 170* 154* 1764650 +/- 5135090 +/- 5564648 +/- 2043450 +/- 3943320 +/- 3823456 +/- 1814600 +/- 5015330 +/- 5735371 +/- 2162830 +/- 343* 178* 190* 156* 175* 193* 193* 142* 196* 160* 177* 191* 194* 172< 6.5 < 0.8 < 0.4< 5.8 < 0.7 < 0.4< 6.1 < 0.7 < 1.5< 6.1 < 0.7 < 4.7< 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.2< 6.7 < 0.8 < 0.6< 5.3 < 0.7 < 0.5* 1.0* 0.9* 0.8* 1.0* 1.0< 0.8<2.12.1 +/- 0.6 < 1.911.2 +/- 1.4 2.8 +/- 1.317.0 +/- 1.9 < 2.06.8 +/- 1.2 2.1 +/- 1.43.4 +/- 1.3 2.0 +/- 0.6 4.0 +/- 1.5< 0.92.1 +/- 0.6 < 2.0<5.1< 6.3* 0.8< 0.6* 0.6* 0.6* 1.3* 0.52.8 +/- 1.6 8.3 +/- 1.2 5.4 + 1.61.7 +/- 1.1 7.7 +/- 1.3 3.4 + 1.3< 5.3 < 0.6 < 0.8< 6.8 < 0.7 < 1.7< 6.4 < 0.8 < 4.2< 0.6< 0.67.0 +/- 1.0 < 1.67.8 +/- 1.4 < 1.610.2 +/- 5.8 29.4 +/- 3.9 43.2 +/- 8.0B-I TABLE B-I.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICALGROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMW-54MW-54MW-54COLLECTIONDATE10/14/14 Ori10/14/14 Re10114114 H-3Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus)Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)ginal 320 +/- 129count 331 +/- 141analysis 459 +/- 145MW-55MW-55MW-55MW-55MW-55MW-55MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-571MW-571MW-571MW-571MW-571MW-571MW-581MW-581MW-581MW-581MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-591MW-601MW-601MW-601MW-611MW-611MW-611MW-611MW-62MW-62MW-62MW-62MW-631MW-631MW-631MW-631MW-6401/14/140 1/14/1401/14/1404/0811407/15/1410/14/1401/13/1404/09/140410911404/09/1407/15/1407/15/1407/15/1410/14/1410/14/1410/14/1412/11/140111411401/14/1401/14/1404/09/1407/15/1410/13/1401/14/1404/09/1407/15/1410/13/1401/14/1404109/1404/09/1404/09/1407/16/1407/16/1407/16/1410/13/1401/14/1404/09/1407/15/1401/13/1404/10/1407/16/1410/14/1401/14/1404/08/1407/16/1410/14/1401/13/1404/10/1407/16/1410/14/1401/14/14TBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIML180188142187 < 6.3 < 0.61020 +/- 154420 +/- 13618800 +/- 19208820 +/- 925 < 5.6 < 0.58320 +/- 877 < 8.4 <0.88859 +/- 276 < 1.1 <0.85130 +/- 5534360 +/- 4765496 +/- 21825600 +/- 261026200 +/- 267026835 +/- 4977140 +/- 75714500 +/- 149013500 +/- 139015161 +/- 3539930 +/- 1040 < 6.7 < 0.95750 +/- 6146390 +/- 6980.9 +/- 0.6 < 0.67.3 +/- 1.3 < 1.6< 0.5< 0.21.5 +/- 1.0 3.8 +/- 0.7 3.3 +/- 1.21.7 +/- 1.0 3.1 +/- 0.7 2.8 +/- 1.20.8 +/- 0.4 2.3 +/- 1.1 15.0 +/- 1.3 3.8 +/- 1.4TBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIML< 175< 192< 158< 174< 184< 189< 167< 144< 157< 153< 137< 189< 181< 189< 158< 188< 184< 158< 178< 191< 188< 158< 174< 174< 191< 156< 194< 175< 4.8 < 0.6 0.5< 5.3 < 0.5 < 0.4< 5.8 < 0.5 0.5< 0.8 < 0.6< 4.6 < 0.7 < 0.4+/- 0.3 < 1.1< 1.2+/- 0.3 < 0.91.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.72.4 +/- 0.7 < 2.52.7 +/- 0.7 < 3.014.4 +/- 3.3 1.8 +/- 0.6 52.0 +/- 3.74.6 +/- 1.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 7.8 +/- 1.7< 5.6 < 0.9 < 0.5< 6.3 < 0.6 < 0.4< 4.5 < 1.0 < 0.9<0.78.7 +/- 1.2 < 1.78.1 +/- 2.8 6.0 +/- 1.1 31.9 +/- 3.1B-2 TABLE B-1.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICALGROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONSITE DATEH-3Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus)Gr-8 (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)MW-64MW-64MW-64MW-65MW-65MW-65MW-65MW-661MW-661MW-661MW-661MW-67MW-67MW-67MW-67MW-67MW-67MW-681MW-681MW-681MW-681MW-691MW-691MW-691MW-691MW-701MW-701MW-701MW-701MW-701MW-701MW-701MW-71MW-71MW-71MW-71MW-71MW-72MW-72MW-72MW-72W-10W-10W-10W-10W-12W-12W-12W-12W-13W-13W-13W-13W-14W-1404/09/1407/15/1410/13/1401/14/1404/09/1407/16/1410/13/1401/14/1404/11/1407/16/1410/15/140111411404/08/1407/15/1407/22/1408/27/1410/14/1401/14/1404/11/1407/16/1410/15/1401/14/1404/07/1407/16/1410/15/1401/14/1404/07/1404/07/140711611410/15/1410/15/1410/15/1401/14/1404/11/1404/11/1407/16/1410/15/1401/14/1404/08/1407/16/1410/16/1401/15/1404/11/1407/21/1410/15/1401/15/1404/07/1407/22/1410/15/1401/15/1404/07/1407/22/1410/15/1401/15/1404/07114* 185* 155* 176* 182* 193* 157* 176* 175* 182* 156* 1938770 +/- 9178600 +/- 90520900 +/- 21305200 +/- 5582990 +/- 3411790 +/- 250* 178< 6.7 < 0.6< 2.0 < 0.7< 0.94.5 +/- 2.5 14.3 +/- 1.7 8.5 +/- 3.01.4 +/- 0.8 11.1 +/- 1.5 < 1.7< 5.8 < 0.7 < 1.9< 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.4< 0.9< 6.4< 0.73.6 +/- 0.9 2.9 +/- 1.43.6 +/- 0.6 < 1.59.3 +/- 1.1 3.0 +/- 1.61.8 +/- 0.6 < 1.5< 190< 158< 180< 193< 188< 155< 195< 178Original < 188Recount< 157TBE < 175TBE < 173EIML < 150< 172Original < 184Recount< 156< 194< 192< 188< 153< 153< 183< 176< 198< 178< 181< 176< 177< 176< 183< 177< 153< 177< 174< 181< 7.8 < 0.7 < 0.3< 5.3 < 0.9 < 0.4< 6.4 < 0.5 < 0.4< 0.92.6 +/- 1.5 2.0 +/- 0.6 9.0 +/- 1.8<1.1< 5.8 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 1.4< 7.5 < 0.7 < 0.6 < 0.99.3 +/- 0.9 4.5 _ 1.44.1 +1.89.3 +/- 1.3 3.4 _ 1.45.1 +1.87.0 +/- 0.9 < 1.51.7 +/- 0.6 < 1.6< 6.4 < 0.9< 5.2 < 0.8< 5.4 < 0.7 << 5.8 < 0.8B-30.5 +/- 0.2 < 0.7+/- 1.4 29.1 +/- 13.4 < 4.2215 +/- 20< 0.72.3 +/- 0.7 < 1.63.1 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/- 1.41.4 + 0.4 4.4 + 1.4 TABLE B-I.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICALGROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONSITE DATEH-3Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus)Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)W-14W-14W-15W-15W-15W-15W-16W-16W-16W-16W-16W-16W-16W-1AW-24W-24W-24W-24W-24W-24W-24W-24W-2BW-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-34W-34W-34W-34W-4W-4W-4W-4W-4AW-4BW-5W-5W-5W-5W-5CW-5KW-5KW-5KW-6W-607/21/1410/17/1401/15/1404/07/1407/21/1410/17/1401/15/1404/08/1407/21/1410/16/1410/16/1410/16/1410/16/1404/11/1401/15/1404/10/1404/10/1404/10/1407/15/1407/16/1407/16/1410/14/1404/18/1401/13/1401/13/1401/13/1404/10/1404/10/1404/10/1407/16/1407/16/1407/16/1410/1411410/14/1410/14/1401/15/1404/10/1407/21/1410/17/1401/13/1404/10/1407/16/1410/14/1404/11/1404/11/1401/14/1404/08/1407/16/1410/15/1404/08/1404/08/1404/08/1404/08/1401/14/1404/08/14TBETBEEIMLEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIMLTBETBEEIML< 191< 158< 179< 177< 154< 159< 181< 163< 155< 157< 154< 150< 150< 177< 180< 189< 181< 144< 171< 157< 137< 177< 178< 177< 179< 142< 184< 195< 146< 169< 155< 137< 177< 175< 151< 181< 186< 184< 184< 175< 188< 156< 176< 176< 172< 182< 193< 158< 177< 172< 173< 178< 144< 182< 189< 5.0 < 0.7 < 0.8< 5.1 < 0.6 < 0.3 <C< 4.8< 5.1< 0.9< 4.4< 7.2< 0.8< 0.7< 0.5< 0.7< 0.5< 0.7< 0.70.4 +/- 0.2<0.5 <1<4.4 <0<4.7 <30.7 +0.5 < 04.4 +/- 2.0 7.3 +/- 1.4 5.1 +/- 2.6).7 3.1 +/- 1.2 < 1.61.4 +/- 0.8 2.0 +/- 0.6 < 1.6.0 3.3 +/- 0.8 < 1.7.9 14.7 +/- 1.8 1.8 +/- 1.01.1 12.0 +/- 4.8 < 8.21.7 13.5 +/- 1.4 < 1.6< 4.7 < 0.9< 4.9 < 0.4 < 0.8< 6.3 < 0.7 < 0.54.9 +/- 1.7 4.7 +/- 1.0 8.2 +/- 1.71.7 +/- 1.0 2.3 +/- 0.7 < 2.1< 6.9B-4< 0.52.7 +/- 0.6 5.8 +/- 2.45.3 +/- 0.8 5.7 +/- 1.8 TABLE B-I.CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM, GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICALGROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATINGSTATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMACOLLECTIONDATESITEH-3Sr-89 Sr-90 Gr-A (Dis) Gr-A (Sus) Gr-B (Dis) Gr-B (Sus)W-6W-6W-7W-7W-7W-7W-7W-7W-9W-9W-9W-907/16/1410/15/1401/15/1404/10/1407/21/1410/17/1410/1711410/17/1401/15/1404/11/1407/22/1410/15/14TBETBEEIML< 154< 176< 179< 174< 186< 156< 156< 150< 182< 168< 155< 177< 4.8 < 0.8 < 3.4< 4.8 < 0.7 < 1.06.1 +/- 2.1 22.9 +/- 2.4 7.2 +/- 2.3< 0.96.1 +/- 1.0 < 2.0B-5 TABLE B-1.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7DATEK-40 Mn-54 Co-58Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137Ba-140 La-140DWN 04109/14 < 21 < 44 < 2 < 2DWS 04/09/14 < 16 < 31 < 2 < 2LW-3 04/10/14 < 19 < 19 < 2 < 2LW-4 04/10/14 < 14 < 31 < 1 < 2MW-15K-1A 04/09/14 < 15 < 25 < 1 < 2MW-16D 04/08/14 < 21 < 20 < 2 < 2MW-1A-2A 04/11/14 < 16 < 17 < 2 < 2MW-1i-lA 04/08/14 < 19 < 16 < 2 < 2MW-1I-2A 04/08/14 < 14 < 12 < 1 < 1MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 18 < 16 < 2 < 2MW-50 04/08/14 TBE < 24 45 +/- 30 < 2 < 2MW-50 04/08/14 EIML < 24 < 33 < 3 < 3MW-50 10/14/14 < 59 < 32 < 5 < 5MW-52 04/09/14 < 10 < 8 < 1 < 1MW-53 04/10/14 < 19 < 37 < 2 < 2MW-54 04/09/14 < 19 < 15 < 2 < 2MW-54 10/14/14 < 54 < 48 < 5 < 5MW-55 04/08/14 < 17 < 13 < 1 < 2MW-55 10/14/14 < 43 < 45 < 4 < 5MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 20 < 34 < 2 < 2MW-561 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 40 < 2 < 2MW-561 04/09/14 EIML < 25 < 63 < 1 < 2MW-561 10/14/14 < 50 121 t 79 < 5 < 5MW-571 04/09/14 < 24 < 22 < 2 < 3MW-571 10/13/14 < 55 < 113 < 6 < 6MW-581 04/09/14 < 22 < 42 < 2 < 2MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 15 < 13 < 1 < 1MW-591 04/09/14 TBE < 22 < 17 < 2 < 2MW-591 04/09/14 EIML < 27 < 56 < 3 < 2MW-601 04/09/14 42 t 17 < 34 < 2 < 2MW-611 04/10/14 < 17 < 14 < 2 < 2MW-611 10/14/14 < 33 < 35 < 4 < 4MW-62 04/08/14 < 18 < 13 < 2 < 2MW-631 04/10/14 < 23 < 41 < 2 < 2MW-64 04/09/14 < 15 < 26 < 1 < 1MW-64 10/13/14 < 54 < 95 < 5 < 6MW-65 04/09/14 < 22 74 t 26 < 2 < 2MW-661 04/11/14 < 20 < 46 < 2 < 2MW-67 04/08/14 < 21 42 +/- 25 < 2 < 2MW-67 10/14/14 < 36 < 86 < 4 < 4MW-681 04/11/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 2MW-691 04/07/14 < 20 < 17 < 2 < 2MW-701 04/07/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 2MW-71 04/11/14 < 21 65 +/- 24 < 2 < 2<5<4<4<3<4<5<4<4<3<5<6<4< 10<3<4<4<13<4<9<5<5<5< 11<6<13<6<4<5<4<4<4<8<4<5<3<11<5<5<5<9<6<4<5<5<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<4<1<2<2<6<2<5<2<2<2<5<2<6<2<1<2<1<2<2<4<1<2<1<5<2<2<2<4<2<2<2<2<4 <2 <4<3 <2 <3<4 <2 <3<3 <2 <3<3 <2 <3<5 <2 <4<3 <2 <3<4 <2 <4<3 <1 <3<3 <2 <3<5 <3 <4<5 <3 <4<9 <6 <10<2 <1 <2<3 <2 <3<4 <2 <4< 11 < 6 < 10<3 <2 <3<9 <5 <8<4 <2 <4<4 <2 <4<3 <4 <5< 10 < 6 < 10<5 <3 <5< 13 < 6 < 11<5 <2 <4<3 <2 <3<4 <2 <4<4 <3 <3<3 <2 <4<3 <2 <3<8 <4 <7<3 <2 <3<4 <2 <4<3 <2 <3< 12 < 6 < 10<4 <2 <4<4 <2 <4<4 <2 <4<8 <4 <7<4 <2 <4<3 <2 <3<4 <3 <4<4 <2 <4<12 <2 <2<10 <2 <2<6 <2 <2<4 <1 <1<10 <1 <1<7 <2 <2<5 <2 <2<7 <2 <2<5 <1 <1<11 <2 <2<16 <2 <2<12 <3 <2<21 <6 <6<7 <1 <1<12 <2 <2<12 <2 <2<16 <5 <6<11 <1 <2<13 <4 <5<12 <2 <2<15 <2 <2<10 <3 <3<15 <5 <5<13 <2 <2<19 <6 <6<13 <2 <2<9 <1 <1<13 <2 <2<6 <3 <2<11 <2 <2<8 <2 <2<11 <3 <4<12 <2 <2<12 <2 <2<10 <1 <1<19 <5 <6<14 <2 <2<9 <2 <2<15 <2 <2<12 <4 <4<10 <2 <2<12 <2 <2<14 <2 <2<11 <2 <2<20 <7<17 <5<12 <5<10 <3<16 <6<16 <6<11 <4<14 <4<11 <3<19 <7<26 <9<17 <4<42 <6<11 <4<20 <6<20 <6< 38 < 10<17 <6< 31 < 10<21 <7<24 < 8<21 <3<36 <11<24 < 8<46 <14<23 < 7<15 <5<22 <6<16 <4<20 <6<14 <5<25 < 7<19 <5<21 <6<16 <5< 41 < 12<22 < 7<17 <5<24 < 7< 27 <8<19 <7<19 <5<23 <7<20 < 5BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-I.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7DATEK-40 Mn-54 Co-58Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131Cs-134 Cs-137Ba-140 La-140MW-72W-10W-12W-13W-14W-15W-16W-1AW-24W-24W-24W-2BW-3W-3W-3W-34W-4W-4AW-4BW-5W-5CW-5KW-5KW-5KW-6W-7W-904/08/14 < 22 52 +/-22 < 2 <204/11/14 < 16 < 29 < 2 < 204/07/14 76+/- 22 248 +/- 31 < 1 < 104/07/14 < 21 < 18 < 2 < 204/07/14 < 17 < 31 < 2 < 204/07/14 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 204/08114 < 20 < 18 < 2 < 204/11/14 < 12 < 22 < 1 < 104/10/14 TBE < 13 <8 < 1 < 104/10/14 TBE < 18 <32 <2 <204/10/14 EIML < 34 < 28 < 3 < 204/18/14 < 17 < 18 < 2 < 204/10/14 TBE < 13 < 10 < 1 < 104/10/14 TBE < 14 35 18 < 1 < 104/10/14 EIML < 35 < 48 < 2 < 304/10/14 < 20 < 15 < 2 < 204/10/14 < 23 < 22 < 2 < 304/11/14 < 17 < 35 < 2 < 204/11/14 < 19 < 39 < 2 < 204/08/14 < 22 < 19 < 2 < 204/08/14 < 19 < 44 < 2 < 204/08/14 TBE < 17 < 16 < 2 < 204/08/14 TBE < 17 < 17 < 2 < 204/08/14 EIML < 20 < 28 < 2 < 204/08/14 < 19 46 26 < 2 <204/10/14 < 14 < 14 < 2 < 204/11/14 < 13 < 11 < 1 < 1<4<4<3<5<4<5<5<3<2<5<4<4<3<3<4<4<6<4<4<5<4<4<4<3<4<3<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<1<4<3<3<4<3<4<4<2<2<3<3<4<2<3<5<4<5<4<4<4<4<4<4<4<4<3<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<4<2<1<2<3<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<1<4<3<3<4<3<4<4<2<2<4<4<3<3<3<4<3<5<4<4<4<4<3<3<5<3<3<2< 13<7< 10< 13< 10< 11< 10<3<6< 10<6< 10<8<8<6<9< 11<5<5< 14<6<5<6<9< 12<5<6<2 <2<2 <2<1 <1<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<1 <1<1 <1<2 <2<3 <3<2 <2<1 <1<1 <1<4 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <2<2 <3<2 <2<1 <2<1 <1<21 <5<14 <5<15 <3<22 < 7<17 <5<19 <6<19 <7<8 <3<11 <2<17 <6<16 <3<18 <5<14 <4<13 <4<18 <3<17 <5<23 <7<12 <4<12 <4<23 < 7<14 <4<12 <4<13 <4<20 < 3<19 <6<10 <3<11 <3BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-1.3CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATERPROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Am-241DATECm-242 Cm-243/244 Pu-238Pu-239/240 U-234 U-235U-238 Fe-55Ni-63MW-buMW-50MW-50MW-54MW-55MW-561MW-561MW-561MW-571MW-611MW-64MW-67U4/U0/1404/08/1404/08/1404/09/1404/08/1404/09/1404/09/1404/09/1404/09/1404/10/1407/15/1404/08/14IBE <TBE <EIML <TBE <TBE <EIML <u.u90.140.080.190.100.120.170.080.160.020.090.10< U.U4< 0.06< 0.11< 0.05< 0.04< 0.11< 0.06< 0.02< 0.09< 0.07< U.ut< 0.10< 0.29< 0.11< 0.09< 0.12< 0.11< 0.13< 0.09< 0.02< 0.05< 0.07< U.12< 0.09< 0.18< 0.05< 0.04< 0.02< 0.04< 0.18< 0.06< 0.02< 0.03< 0.08< U.uZ< 0.07< 0.25< 0.03< 0.09< 0.09< 0.07< 0.18< 0.05< 0.14< 0.03< 0.13< u.1u< 0.160.65< 0.06< 0.07< 0.17< 0.130.27< 0.11< 0.190.81< 0.15< U.Ub< 0.05+/- 0.18 -< 0.15< 0.07< 0.05< 0.17+/- 0.15 -< 0.17< 0.15+/- 0.39 < 0.08< 0.18< U.UM< 0.100.19< 0.03< 0.04< 0.12< 0.160.13< 0.08< 0.151.30< 0.10< lb2< 87+/- 0.10 < 756< 150< 50< 104< 62+/- 0.10 < 760< 110< 58+/- 0.50 < 105< 93< 4.b< 4.7* 157< 4.3< 4.5< 3.5< 4.7< 128< 4.8<5< 4.8< 4.9,0 TABLE B-11.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTIONPROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDCOLLECTIONDATE01/15/1403/12/1403/13/1403/14/1403/15/1403/16/1403/17/1403/18/1403/19/1403/20/1403/21/1403/22/1403/23/1403/24/1403/25/1403/26/1403/27/1403/28/1403/29/140313011403/31/1404/01/1404/02/1404/03/1404/04/1404/05/1404/06/1404/07/1404/08/1404/09/1404/10/1404/11/1404/12/1404/13/1404/14/1404/15/1404/16/1404/17/1404/18/1404/19/1404/20/1404/21/1404/22/1404/23/1404/24/1404/25/1404/26/1404/27/1404/28/1404/29/1404/30/1405/01/1405/02/1405/03/1405/04/1405/05/14H-3< 179< 182< 184< 186< 189< 192< 184< 179< 187< 170< 172< 170< 171< 174< 170< 178< 177< 173< 175< 174< 177< 172< 173< 174< 175< 193< 191< 193< 192< 193< 196< 194< 198< 195< 197< 195< 188< 191< 187< 193< 191< 193< 195< 190< 194< 193< 192< 196< 196< 193< 196< 192< 195< 194< 193< 193B-9 TABLE B-II.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTIONPROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDCOLLECTIONDATE05/06/1405/07/1405/08/1405/09/1405/10/1405/11/1405/12/1405/13/1405/14/1405/15/1405/16/1405/17/1405118/1405/19/1405/20/1405/21/1405/22/1405/23/1405/24/1405/25/1405/26/1405/27/1405/28/1405/29/1405/30/1405/31/1406/01/1406/02/1406/03/1406/04/1406/05/1406/06/1406/07/1406/08/1406/09/1406/10/1406/11/1406/12/1406/13/1406/14/1406/15/1406/16/1406/1711406/18/1406/19/1406/20/1406/21/1406/22/1406/23/1406/24/1406/25/1406/26/1406/27/1406/28/1406/29/1406/30/14H-3* 193* 196* 193* 187* 192* 189* 185* 190* 189* 187* 185* 187* 184* 188* 189* 175* 189* 188* 190* 190* 193* 194* 172* 171* 172* 172* 172* 171* 170* 168* 167* 172* 172* 170* 172* 170* 171* 176* 171* 177* 178* 175* 175* 177* 175* 177* 176* 179* 175* 178* 173* 175* 171* 175* 157* 157B-1O TABLE B-II.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTIONPROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITSOF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDCOLLECTIONDATE07/01/1407102/1407/03/1407/04/1407/05/1407/06/1407/07/1407/08/1407/09/1407/10/1407/11/1407/12/1407/13/1407/14/1407/15/1407116/1407/17/1407/18/1407/19/1407/20/1407/21/1407/22/1407/23/1407/24/1407/25/1407126/1407/27/1407/28/1407/29/1407/30/1407/31/1408/01/1408/02/1408/03/1408/04/1408/0511408/06/1408/07/1408/08/1408/09/1408/10/1408/11/1408/12/1408/13/1408/14/1408/15/1408/16/1408/17/1408/18/1408/19/1408/20/1408/21/1408/22/1408/23/1408/24/1408/26/14H-3< 158< 156< 159< 156< 159< 156< 175< 174< 173< 173< 174< 174< 173< 174< 175< 175< 168< 185< 181< 182< 184< 182< 183< 181< 183< 183< 184<184< 182< 183< 184< 157< 159< 158< 160< 163< 164< 163< 165< 163< 164< 166< 168< 167< 163< 165< 165< 166< 169< 167< 165< 162< 165< 176< 168< 173B-il TABLE B-II.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTIONPROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDCOLLECTIONDATE08/27/1408/28/1408/29/1408/30/1408/31/1409/01/1409/02/1409/03/1409/04/1409/05/1409/06/1409/07/1409/08/1409/09/1409/10/1409/11/1409/12/1409/13/1409/14/1409/15/1409/16/1411/07/1411/08/1411/09/1411/10/1411/25/1411/26/1411/27/1411/28/1411/29/1411/30/1412/01/1412/02/1412/03/1412/04/1412/05/1412/06/1412/07/1412/08/1412/09/1412/10/1412/11/1412/12/1412/13/1412/14/1412/15/1412/16/1412/17/1412/18/1412/19/1412/20/1412/21/1412/22/1412/23/1412/24/1412/25/14H-3< 157< 154< 156* 158< 157* 159* 159< 159* 160< 156< 155* 160< 159* 155* 160< 157< 159< 170< 157< 156< 152* 143* 153* 148* 152* 150* 149* 152* 152* 153* 154* 154* 155* 154* 154* 154* 155* 155* 153* 153* 153* 190* 189< 188< 184< 188< 187* 191< 190< 186* 191< 167< 179< 172< 173< 173B-12 TABLE B-II.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTIONPROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDsw-isw-lSw-1sw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-isw-isw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-isw-iSw-iSw-isw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-isw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSw-iSW-2SW-2SW-2SW-2SW-3SW-3SW-3SW-3COLLECTIONDATE12/26/1412/27/1412/28/1412/29/1412/30/1412/31/1401/15/1403/12/1403/19/1403/27/1404/02/1404/09/1404/09/1404/16/1404/23/1405/01/1405/07/1405/14/1405/21/1405/28/1406/04/1406/11/1406/18/1406/25/1407/02/1407/09/1407/16/1407/23/1407/30/1408/06/1408/13/1408/20/1408/27/1409/03/1409/10/1411/26/1412/03/1412/10/1412/17/1412/24/1412/31/1401/15/1404/07/1407/17/1410/14/1401/15/1404/07/1407/17/1410/14/14H-3* 173* 167* 179* 172* 169* 167* 170* 187* 194* 176* 175* 176* 193* 195* 192* 193* 191* 193* 193* 172* 174* 174* 175* 171* 174* 174* 172* 173* 172* 173* 171* 166* 173* 170* 171* 156* 150* 152* 180* 179* 179* 179* 183* 170< 178< 182< 182< 195< 176B-13 TABLE B-1I.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7DATEK-40 Mn-54 Co-58Fe-59 Co-60Zn-65 Nb-95Zr-95 1-131Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140La-140MCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCD03/12/14 < 2403/13/14 < 1803/14/14 < 2303/15/14 < 2903/16/14 < 2703/17/14 < 2503/18/14 < 2603/19/14 < 2003/20114 < 1303/21/14 < 2303/22/14 < 2403/23/14 < 2303/24/14 < 1803/25/14 < 2603/26/14 < 2403/27/14 < 1803/28/14 < 2003/29/14 < 1503/30/14 < 2003/31/14 < 1304/01/14 < 2104/02/14 < 1804/03/14 < 2304/04/14 < 2104/05/14 < 2104/06/14 < 2104/07/14 < 1604/08/14 < 1804/09/14 < 1004/10/14 < 1704/11/14 < 1604/12/14 < 1304113114 < 1704/14/14 < 1704/15/14 < 1604116/14 < 1504/17/14 < 1504/18/14 < 1804/19/14 < 2004/20/14 < 20229 +/- 51 < 1231 +/- 50 < 1336 +/- 45 < 1249 +/- 40 < 2153 +/-64 < 2224 +/- 69 < 2246 +/- 72 < 1206 +/- 51 < 1277 +/- 42 < 1197 +/- 59 < 2227 +/- 74 < 2298 +/- 76 < 2237 +/- 54 < 2285 +/- 93 < 2329 +/- 80 < 2336 +/- 64 < 2386 +/- 67 < 2280 +/- 57 < 2288 +/- 54 < 2281 +/- 42 < 1245 +/- 62 < 2295 +/- 76 < 2284 +/- 79 < 2337 +/- 75 < 2340 +/- 78 < 2363 +/- 69 < 2342 +/- 64 < 2298 +/- 57 < 2234 +/- 41 < 1204 +/- 67 < 2290 +/- 69 < 2243 +/- 49 < 1245 +/- 69 < 2338 +/- 71 < 2226 +/- 55 < 2292 +/- 63 < 1297 +/- 59 < 1221 +/- 44 < 1263 +/- 55 < 2263 +/- 59 < 2<2<2<2<3<3<3<3<2<1<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<6 <2<5 <1<5 <2<8 <2<6 <2<6 <2<6 <2<4 <1<3 <1<5 <2<6 <2<5 <2<4 <2<7 <3<6 <2<4 <2<4 <2<3 <2<4 <2<3 <1<4 <2<4 <2<5 <3<5 <2<4 <3<4 <2<4 <2<4 <2<2 <1<4 <2<4 <2<3 <1<4 <2<4 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<4 <1<5 <1<5 <1<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<5 <3<3 <3<3 <3<4 <3<3 <2<2 <2<3 <2<4 <2<4 <3<3 <2<5 <3<5 <3<3 <2<4 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <1<3 <2<3 <2<5 <2<4 <2<4 <2<4 <2<3 <2<4 <2<2 <1<3 <2<4 <2<3 <1<3 <2<4 <2<4 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2< 4 < 120<3 <86<4 <97<6 < 169< 5 < 118< 5 < 108<4 < 100<3 <77<3 <20<4 < 26<5 < 32<4 <27<3 <19<6 <25<4 <22<3 <16<4 <16<3 <11<3 <14<2 <9<4 <12<3 <10<5 <12<4 <11<4 <10<4 <9<3 <7<3 <7<2 <4<3 <6<3 <6<2 <4<3 <4<4 <4<3 <4<3 <3<3 <3<3 <41<4 <43<4 <36<1<1<1<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2< 73< 63< 70< 111< 97< 77< 74< 60< 24< 34< 39<36* 24* 38< 33< 23* 25* 16* 21* 14* 21* 18* 23* 23* 20* 18* 13* 15<9* 14* 12<9< 12* 12* 10<9<9< 35< 43* 38< 21< 18< 17< 34< 25< 28< 23<15<6<11<9<11<7< 10<11<6<7<6<5<4<6<3<7<7<6<6<4<4<3<3<3<2<4<3<3<3<2< 11< 14< 13BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-1I.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K-40 Mn-54Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140DATE,'MCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCD04121114 < 2904/22114 < 2804/23114 < 2904/24/14 < 2804/25/14 < 2404/26/14 < 2804/27/14 < 2504/28/14 < 1704/29/14 < 2204/30/14 < 2105/01/14 < 2705/02/14 < 2805/03/14 < 2705/04/14 < 2405/05/14 < 2505/06/14 < 3005/07/14 < 2505/08/14 < 2105/09/14 < 2405/10/14 < 2605/11/14 < 2805/12/14 < 2905/13/14 < 3905/14/14 < 3705/15/14 < 2705/16/14 < 3705/17/14 < 4705/18/14 < 4905/19/14 < 5605/20/14 < 6005/21/14 < 7105/22/14 < 7705/23/14 < 8705/24/14 < 7505/25/14 < 8105/26/14 < 11105/27114 < 8505/28/14 < 3305/29/14 < 2505/30/14 < 32306 +/- 78 < 2345 +/- 71 < 2317 +/- 81 < 2295 +/- 75 < 2320 +/- 75 < 2290 +/- 91 < 2300 +/- 75 < 2243 +/- 51 < 2313 +/- 65 < 2225 +/- 64 < 2266 +/- 78 < 2363 +/- 79 < 2228 +/- 78 < 3286 +/- 82 < 2263 +/- 76 < 2337 +/- 77 < 3301 +/- 78 < 2273 +/- 73 < 3306 +/- 92 < 2379 +/- 98 < 3385 +/- 97 < 3329 +/- 89 < 3265 +/- 97 < 4314 +/- 93 < 4232 +/- 89 < 3292 +/- 114 < 3282 +/- 82 < 5308 +/- 82 < 5196 +/- 106 < 7249 +/- 112 < 6323 +/- 122 < 8505 +/- 163 < 9299 +/- 133 < 9265 126 < 9334 +/-136 < 9< 134 < 12286 177 < 11216 65 < 2222 63 < 2297 80 < 2<3<3<2<3<2<3<2<2<2<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<2<3<3<3<4<4<3<3<5<6<8<6<9<9<9<9<11<11<9<3<2<3<7<7<7<6<6<7<6<4<5<5<7<5<6<6<5<7<5<5<5<6<7<6<8<7<6<9<11< 10< 14< 13< 18< 18< 19< 17< 19< 23< 25<8<6<9<2<4<3<2<2<3<3<1<1<2<3<3<2<3<2<3<2<2<3<4<2<3<4<4<3<3<5<6<8<6<9<9<9< 10< 11<9< 10<2<2<2<4<5<4<4<4<5<4<3<3<4<4<5<5<5<4<5<4<5<5<5<6<6<7<7<6<7<11<11< 14< 13< 20< 20< 21< 21< 20< 21< 21<4<3<5<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<2<2<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<2<3<3<3<3<4<4<3<4<6<6<7<7<9< 10< 10< 10< 10< 11< 11<3<3<3<5<5<5<5<5<6<5<3<4<3<4<5<5<5<5<6<5<4<5<5<5<6<6<6<5<8<9<11<11<11< 14< 17< 16< 17< 17< 21< 18<6<5<6< 49< 53< 42< 40< 35< 35< 29< 20< 26< 18< 24< 26< 23< 18< 18< 21< 14< 11< 12< 14< 12< 12< 13< 14<9<9< 14< 15< 15< 13< 14< 14< 14< 13< 13< 13< 10< 284< 206< 216<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<3<.3<3<3<4<3<4<5<5<7<7<8<9< 10<9< 10< 11< 10<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<3<3<3<4<5<3<4<5<6<8<7<8< 10< 10< 10< 12< 11< 12<2<2<2< 47< 56< 53<46< 41< 44< 41< 27< 31< 29< 32< 38< 32<34< 32< 34< 24< 21< 20< 25< 25< 24< 27< 29< 21< 26< 33< 32< 35< 35< 38< 46< 44< 44< 42< 39< 36< 158< 113< 142< 17< 13< 15< 15<8< 16< 10<8<9<8<6<7<8< 10<8< 10<7<8<8<6<5<6<5<8<7<7< 10< 13< 11<8< 10< 15< 12< 12< 12< 11< 13<46< 35< 52BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-11.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K-40 Mn-54 Co-58Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140La-140DATEONMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCD05/31/14 < 2106/01/14 < 2806/02/14 < 2306/03/14 < 2906/04/14 < 1806/05/14 < 2006/06/14 < 2706/07/14 < 3406/08/14 < 2806/09/14 < 2406/10/14 < 2606/11/14 < 2706/12/14 < 41.06/13/14 < 3106/14/14 < 3406/15/14 < 2306/16/14 < 2506/17/14 < 2406/18/14 < 3006/19114 < 3106/20/14 < 3006/21/14 < 3106/22/14 < 2206/23/14 < 2606/24/14 < 2306/25/14 < 2906/26/14 < 2506/27/14 < 3506/28/14 < 2506/29/14 < 2206/30/14 < 1907/01/14 < 2007/02/14 < 2107/03/14 < 2307/04/14 < 1307/05/14 < 1707/06/14 < 2307/07/14 < 3207/08/14 < 2207/09/14 < 21267 +/- 48 < 1287 +/- 69 < 2206 t 64 < 2348 +/- 65 < 2217 +/- 43 < 1289 +/- 67 < 2255 +/- 73 < 2325 +/- 72 < 2424+/- 84 < 2250 1 79 < 2257 +/- 83 < 2286+/- 73 < 2378 +/-77 < 3425 +/-83 < 2279 86 < 3281 +/- 58 < 2136 +/- 63 < 2279 +/- 73 < 2327 +/- 75 < 2325 +/- 73 < 2362 +/- 77 < 2367 75 < 2356 +/-77 < 2208 +/- 84 < 2371 +/-80 < 2358 +/-72 < 2284 +/- 72 < 2346 +/- 79 < 3321 +/- 78 < 2301 +/- 83 < 2325 +/- 58 < 1366 +/- 84 < 2345 +/- 72 < 2329 +/- 69 < 2222 +/- 43 < 1257 +/- 66 < 2294 +/- 75 < 2321 +/- 84 < 3398 +/- 79 < 2334+/- 90 < 3<2<3<2<2<2<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<4<3<3<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<3<2<3<2<3<3<3<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<2<2<5<8<6<6<5<6<6<8<7<6<5<7< 11<7< 10<6<6<7<7<7<7<7<5<8<7<6<5<7<5<5<4<5<5<4<3<4<5<7<5<5<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<2<2<3<4<4<4<3<4<4<5<4<4<4<.5<6<4<5<4<4<5<4<5<5<5<3<5<4<4<4<5<4<5<3<4<4<5<2<3<4<6<4<5<2<3<3<3<2<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<5<3<4<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<3<3<3<2<3<2<3<3<3<2<2<2<3<2<2<3<5<5<5<3<5<5<6<5<4<5<5<7<6<7<4<5<5<6<6<5<5<5<5<4<5<5<6<4<5<3<4<4<4<2<3<4<6<4<4< 146< 172< 153< 157< 92< 85< 120< 127< 101< 67< 77< 69< 186< 137< 124< 79< 82< 74< 75< 80< 62< 65< 44< 46< 41< 41< 35< 42< 31< 25< 20< 19< 20< 18< 10< 12< 14< 18< 10< 10<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<3<2<2<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<3<2<2<2< 2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<2<2< 89< 119< 105< 96< 61< 65< 85< 95< 77< 64< 65<64< 135< 101< 100< 68< 73< 68< 66< 74< 63<64< 44< 48< 45< 45< 41< 52< 38< 33< 25< 30< 29< 24< 16< 20< 22< 30< 19< 20< 26< 25< 27< 29< 20< 16< 23< 26< 26< 21< 20< 22< 41< 22< 30< 22< 24< 23< 20< 23< 19< 16< 12< 14< 15< 12< 13< 13< 11< 10<8<7< 10<8<4<5<5<7<7<6BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-11.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140DATE-3MCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCD07/10/14 < 5107/11/14 < 1807/12/14 < 1807/13/14 < 1507/14/14 < 1207/15/14 < 1607/16/14 < 1607/17/14 < 1507/18/14 < 1807/19/14 < 2307/20/14 < 2107/21/14 < 2507/22/14 < 2107/23114 < 2107/24/14 < 2207/25/14 < 1207/26/14 < 1907/27/14 < 2107/28/14 < 1707/29/14 < 2107/30/14 < 1707/31/14 < 2108/01/14 < 1908/02/14 < 1908/03/14 < 2708/04/14 < 2608/05/14 < 1608/06/14 < 2408107/14 < 2008/08/14 < 2808/09/14 < 1808/10114 < 4808/11/14 < 2308/12/14 < 2408/13114 < 2808/14/14 < 1408/15114 < 2208/16/14 < 2308/17/14 < 1508/18/14 < 22316 +/- 65 < 5449 +/- 82 < 2325 +/- 71 < 2334 +/- 67 < 1278 +/- 56 < 1348 +/- 75 < 2304 +/- 62 < 2275 +/- 56 < 2313 +/- 56 < 1280 +/- 66 < 2274 +/- 51 < 1242 +/- 69 < 2208 +/- 55 < 1312 +/- 59 < 2254 +/- 52 < 2219 +/- 39 < 1317 +/- 58 < 2242 +/- 64 < 2275 +/- 51 < 1286 +/- 65 < 2264 +/- 53 < 1240 +/- 68 < 1300 +/- 64 < 1217 +/- 51 < 1368 t 68 < 2316 +/- 94 < 3322 +/- 57 < 1344+/- 69 < 2321 +/- 67 < 2312 +/- 86 < 3303 +/- 66 < 2298 +/- 84 < 480 < 2439 +/-: 95 < 2321 +/- 73 < 3225 +/- 52 < 1241 1+/-80 < 2285 1 68 < 2258 t 56 < 2380:+/-:89 < 2<5<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<3< 4<1< 3<2<3<2<5<3<2<3<2<2<2<2<3< 11<4<4<4<3<4<3<3<5<6<5<7<5.< 5<6<4<5<5<4<5<4<5<5<4<6<6<4<7<4<6<5< 12<5<5<6<3<4<5<3<5<5<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<1<1<2<1<1<2<1<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<2<1<3<2<4<3<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<11 <6<4 <2<4 <2<3 <2<3 <1<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<4 <2<4 <2<4 <3<3 <2<3 <2<3 <2<2 <1<3 <2<4 <2<2 <2<4 <2<3 <2<4 <2<3 <2<3 <2<5 <3<4 <3<3 <2<5 <3<3 <2<6 <3<4 <2<9 <6<4 <3<5 <3<5 <3<3 <2<5 <2<4 <2<3 <2<5 <3< 10<4<4<3<3<3<3<3<3<4<4<5<4<4<4<2<3<4<3<4<4<4<4<3<5<5<3<5<4<6<4<9<5<4<5<3<4<4<3<4< 18<6<6<4<3<3<4<3< 92< 99< 84< 97< 78< 71< 65< 37< 51< 46< 36< 40< 31< 32< 32< 27< 36< 29< 18<24< 18< 24< 14< 39< 16< 16< 16<8< 10< 10<7<9<5<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<1<2<1<2<1<2<2<1<1<2<1<2<1<2<1<1<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<4<2<2<3<1<2<2<1<2<5<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<3<2<1<2<2<3<2<5<2<2<3<1<2<2<2<3< 38 < 10<14 <3<14 <3<12 <2<9 <3<10 <2<10 <3<9 <2< 68 < 19<81 <23< 66 < 22< 73 < 21<64 <15< 65 < 14< 55 < 13<32 <8< 49 < 11< 45 < 13<31 <8< 44 < 14< 35 < 12< 38 < 10< 34 < 10<33 < 7< 45 < 12<48 < 11<24 < 8<31 <8<25 <8< 38 < 10<26 <7< 62 < 16<28 < 7<25 < 9<26 <8<15 <5<20 <6<20 < 5<14 <3<20 <6BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-II.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140DATE00MCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCD08/19/1408/20/1408/21/1408/22/1408/23/1408/24/1408/26/1408/27/1408/28/1408/29/1408/30/1408/31/1409/01/1409/02/1409/03/1409/04/1409/05/1409/06/1409/07/1409/08/1409/09/1409/10/1409/11/1409/12/1409/13/1409/14/1409/15/1409/16/1411/07/1411/08/1411/09/1411/10/1411/25/1411/26/1411/27/1411/28/1411/29/1411/30/1412/01/1412/02/14< 13< 19< 22< 23< 14< 14< 15< 26< 22< 30< 12< 21< 17< 13< 17< 10< 19< 14< 13< 18< 12< 21< 34< 15< 14< 59< 58< 53< 18< 19< 22< 24< 25< 13< 19< 17< 26< 53< 17< 20224272360273214212251351423569233210172226216279492222209289298580252273284287263270289285269240294273245283308300204222+/- 63+/- 84+/- 92+/- 90+/-56+/- 59+/- 53+/- 82+/- 89+/- 88+/- 40+/- 70+/- 71+/- 48+/- 65+/- 37+/- 64+/- 59+/- 50+/- 82+/- 43+/- 77+/- 65+/- 71+/- 54+/- 67+/- 72+/- 65+/- 53+/- 64+/- 66+/- 85+/- 77+/- 56+/- 75+/- 68+/- 94+/- 80+/- 66+/- 84<2<2<2<3<1<2<2<3<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<1<1<2<1<2<3<2<1<5<4<4<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<6<2<2<2<.2<2<2<1<1<2<3<3<3<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<4<2<1<7<6<5<1<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<3<6<2<2<4<5<4<5<3<3<4<8<6<6<3<4<4<3<5<3<4<4<3<5<3<5<8<4<3< 16< 15< 15<4<4<6<7<5<3<4<4<7< 14<3<5<2<2<2<2<1<1<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<1<1<2<1<2<3<2<1<4<4<4<2<1<2<2<2<2<3<2<3<6<2<2<3<4<4<4<3<3<3<6<5<4<2<3<3<2<4<2<4<3<3<4<2<4<7<3<3< 11< 10<9<3<4<3<4<4<3<4<3<5< 12<3<4<2<3<2<3<1<2<2<3<3<3<2<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<4<2<1<7<7<6<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<2<3<7<2<2<3<5<4<4<3<3<3<6<5<5<2<4<4<2<3<2<4<3<2<4<2<4<7<3<2< 12< 11< 10<3<4<5<4<4<3<5<3< 5< 11<4<4<6<7<6<7<5<4<4< 25< 22< 27< 11< 16< 13<9< 11<7< 12<8<7<9<6< 10< 15<6<5< 193< 157< 130< 36< 41< 40< 35< 12<7<9<8< 10< 22<5<7<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<1<1<2<1<2<1<1<2<1<2<3<1<1<4<4<4<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<6<2<2<2<2<2<3<1<1<2<3<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<1<2<1<2<4<2<1<4<4<4<1<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<3<6<2<2< 13< 16< 14< 15< 11< 10< 10< 39< 32< 37< 16< 24< 21< 15< 18< 11< 20< 14< 12< 19< 11< 19< 31< 13< 10< 160< 142< 128< 36< 43< 41< 43< 23< 14< 20< 16< 22< 44< 13*15<3<5<5<5<3<3<3< 10<8< 10<4<8<6<4<7<4<5<3<3<5<3<5<9<3<3< 48< 41< 42<11<11< 13< 13<6<5<5<4<6< 14<4<5BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-11.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K40 Mn-54Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140DATEMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDMCDSW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-1SW-112103114 < 2312/04/14 < 1712105114 < 1912/06/14 < 2112/07/14 < 1912/08/14 < 2112/09/14 < 1512/10/14 < 1212/11/14 < 1912/12/14 < 2212/13/14 < 3112/14/14 < 3712/15/14 < 3112/16/14 < 2512/17/14 < 2912/18/14 < 2012/19/14 < 2912/20/14 < 3012/21/14 < 2312/22/14 < 3412/23114 < 3012/24/14 < 3012/25/14 < 2412/26/14 < 3012/27/14 < 1612/28114 < 2212/29/14 < 2312/30114 < 1712/31/14 < 2703/12/14 < 2303/19/14 < 2903/27/14 < 2204/02/14 < 1404/09/14 < 1604/09/14 < 2104/16/14 < 1304/23/14 < 3005/01/14 < 2905/07/14 < 1805/14/14 < 26364 +/- 74 < 2318 +/- 74 < 2274 +/- 81 < 2314 +/- 87 < 2323 +/- 87 < 2451 +/- 79 < 2247 +/- 71 < 1273 +/- 48 < 1227 +/- 50 < 1210 +/- 55 < 1186 +/- 92 < 3216 +/- 88 < 3252 +/- 71 < 2227 +/- 78 < 2255 +/- 74 < 2215 +/- 49 < 2333 +/- 72 < 2268 +/- 80 < 2264 +/- 64 < 2367 +/- 92 < 3222 +/- 98 < 2268 +/- 87 < 2153 +/- 63 < 2250 +/- 72 < 2278 +/- 55 < 1341 +/- 75 < 2280 +/- 84 < 2296 +/- 60 < 1211 +/-89 <2238 +/- 53 < 1301 +/- 67 < 2305 +/- 80 < 2228 +/- 58 < 1218 +/- 60 < 2239 +/- 39 < 2236 +/- 54 < 1345 +/- 82 < 2274 +/- 93 < 2219 +/- 51 < 1234 +/- 96 < 3<2<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<4<3<3<2<3<2<3<2<2<3<3<3<2<3<2<2<2<2<3<2<3<2<2<2<2<1<3<3<2<3<4<4<4<4<5<3<4<3<4<6< 10<7<9<6<7<4<8<7<5<9<7<6<5<7<4<6<6<4<6<5<7<5<4<4<5<3<8<6<4<6<2 <4<2 <4<2 <4<2 <5<3 <5<1 <4<2 <3<1 <2<1 <3<2 <3<3 <6<2 <6<3 <5<2 <3<2 <5<1 <3<3 <5<2 <4<1 <3<3 <7<2 <5<2 <4<2 <4<2 <4<1 <3<3 <4<2 <4<1 <3<2 <5<1 <3<2 <4<2 <4<1 <3<1 <3<3 <5<1 <3<2 <5<2 <5<2 <3<3 <6<2 <4<2 <3<2 <3<3 <4<2 <4<2 <4<2 <3<2 <2<2 <3<2 <4<4 <7<4 <5<3 <6<3 <5<4 <5<2 <4<3 <6<3 <5<2 <4<4 <7<3 <6<3 <5<2 <4<3 <5<2 <3<3 <4<3 <4<2 <3<3 <6<2 <5<3 <4<2 <4<2 <3<2 <3<3 <4<1 <2<4 <5<3 <5<2 <3<3 <6<7 <2<6 <2<5 <2<5 <2<5 <2<5 <2<3 <2<2 <1<53 <1<66 < 1< 103 < 2<88 <2<93 <2<61 <2<79 <2<44 <1<66 <2<53 <2<42 < 1<60 <3<52 <2<44 <2< 28 <2<42 <2<20 <1<26 <2<29 <2<23 <2<25 <2< 124 < 1< 110 < 2<21 <2<9 <1<6 <2<6 <2<3 <1<50 <2<22 <2<10 <1<8 <2<3<2<2<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<3<3<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<1<3<3<2<3<17 <4<13 <4<14 <4<13 <4<14 <4<12 <3<9 <4<7 <2< 48 < 14< 60 < 16< 84 < 33< 81 < 19< 83 < 21<54 <18< 76 < 18< 42 < 13< 58 < 18< 58 < 16<46 < 13< 61 < 21< 48 < 14< 48 < 14< 39 < 12< 49 < 13<24 < 5<40 <8<34 <11<31 <8<36 < 11< 78 < 20< 91 < 24<30 < 11<16 <4<13 <4<14 <5<7 <2< 55 < 15<41 <8<17 <4<23 <8BOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-11.2CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AS PART OF THERADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Be-7K-40 Mn-54Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-951-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140La-140DATESW-iSW-iSW-iSW-iSw-iSW-iSW-iSW-iSw-iSW-iSW-iSW-iSW-iSW-iSw-iSW-iSw-iSW-iSW-isw-iSW-iSw-iSw-iSW-2SW-2SW-305/21/14 < 7105/28/14 < 3106/04114 < 3206/11114 < 2906/18/14 < 1706/25/14 < 2107/02/14 < 307/09/14 < 2407/16/14 < 1207/23/14 < 1407/30/14 < 1708/06/14 < 5708/13/14 < 2408/20/14 < 2208/27/14 < 2409/03/14 < 1509/10/14 < 2011/26/14 < 1712/03/14 < 1212/10/14 < 2112/17/14 < 1812/24/14 < 2412/31/14 < 2304/07/14 < 1707/17/14 < 704/07/14 < 17273 +/- 138 < 9221 +/- 71 < 2234 +/- 79 < 2293 +/- 72 < 2241 +/- 50 < 1288 +/- 54 < 289 +/- 16 < 0391 +/- 77 < 2313 +/- 51 < 1240 +/- 36 < 1329 +/- 49 < 1279 +/- 70 < 5212 +/- 82 < 2252 +/- 81 < 2226 +/- 79 < 2275 +/- 61 < 1260 +/- 75 < 2299 +/- 63 < 2247 +/- 42 < 1280 +/- 88 < 2216 +/- 57 < 1241 +/- 73 < 2313 +/- 86 < 2224 +/- 31 < 2289 +/- 39 < 1< 31 < 2<8 <19<3 <6<3 <8<2 <7<2 <4<2 <5<0 <1<3 <6<1 <3<1 <4<2 <5<6 <15<2 <5<3 <6<3 <7<2 <4<2 <4<2 <4<1 <2<3 <5<2 <4<3 <6<2 <6<2 <4<1 <2<2 <4< 10<2<2<2<1<2<0<2<1<1<1<5<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<3<1<2<2<2<1<2< 16<5<5<4<3<3<1<5<3<2<3< 11<4<5<5<2<4<3<2<4<3<3<4<4<2<3<9 <15<3 <6<4 <7<3 <5<2 <3<2 <4<0 <1<3 <5<1 <2<2 <2<2 <3<6 <11<2 <4<3 <4<3 <5<2 <3<2 <4<2 <3<1 <2<3 <4<2 <3<2 <5<3 <5<2 <3<1 <1<2 <3<14 <8< 333 < 2< 208 < 2< 110 < 2<38 < 1< 24 <2<2 <0<10 <3<3 <1<45 < 1<44 <1<80 <5<18 <2<11 <2<28 <2<12 <1<10 <2<10 <2<4 <1<4 <2<42 < 1<35 < 2< 20 <2<6 <2<2 <1<6 <2<9<2<2<2<1<2<0<3<1<1<1<5<2<3<2<2<2<2<1<3<1<2<2<2<1<2< 39< 173< 151< 91< 37< 31<4< 19<7< 39< 42< 96< 24< 22< 40< 21< 18< 16<9< 12< 44< 44< 26< 13<4< 13<7<54< 26< 22< 11<8<1<5<2< 11< 10< 26<7<8< 14<5<7<5<2<4< 12< 11< 11<5<1<40uBOLDED VALUES INDICATE LLD WAS NOT MET DUE TO THE AGE OF THE SAMPLE AT TIME OF RECEIPT AT THE LABORATORY TABLE B-I.3 TABLE B-II.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF HARD TO DETECTS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATERPROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITECOLLECTION Am-241 Cm-242DATECm-243/244 Pu-238 Pu-239/24C U-234 U-235U-238 Fe-55Ni-63DATENONE FOR 2014,=j TABLE B-Ill.1CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN PRECIPITATION WATER SAMPLESCOLLECTED AS PART OF THE RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATERPROTECTION PROGRAM, OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2014RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMASITE22223333444455556666COLLECTIONDATE01/13/1404/09/1407/23/1410/13/1401/13/1404/09/1407/23/1410/13/1401/13/1404/09/1407/23/1410/13/1401/13/1404/08/1407/23/1410/13/1401/13/1404/09/1407/23/1410/13/14UH-3< 182< 180< 178< 191< 189< 178* 181< 189< 177< 176< 182< 190* 183< 179< 180< 192< 174< 179< 182< 190B-22