IR 05000266/1993017

Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-266/93-17 & 50-301/93-17 on 931115-18 (Ref 10CFR73.21).One non-cited Violation Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Security Program Plans & Audit & Protected & Vital Area Physical Barriers

ML20059B810
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	12/15/1993
From:	Creed J, Madeda T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059B791	List: IR 05000266/1993017 ML20059B787
References
50-266-93-17, 50-301-93-17, NUDOCS 9401040252
Download: ML20059B810 (2)

Text

"

,

'

cm U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Reports No. 50-266/93017(DRSS); 50-301/93017(DRSS)

Dockets No. 50-266; 50-301 Licenses No. DPR-24; DPR-27 Licensee: Wisconsin Electric Power Company ,

231 West Michigan '

Milwaukee, WI 53201 Facility Name: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

'

Inspection At: Plant Site, Two Rivers, Wisconsin Inspection Dates: November 15-18, 1993 Date of Previous Physical Security Inspection: February 8-12 and 22, 1993 Inspector: 90 * "W "

1 /e# -

MM '

Terfy J. Madeda U Date Physical Security inspector Approved By: b A" d YISl' b M James'R. Creed, Chief Date Safeguards & Incident Response Section i

'

Inspection Summary Inspection on November 15-18. 1993 (Reports No. 50-266/93017(DRSS):

No. 50-301/93017(DRSS))

Areas Inspected: Routine, announced physical security inspection involving: ,

Management Support, Security Program Plans and Audit; Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids and Followup on Previous Inspection Finding Results: Two violations were identified. One violation was identified concerning failures to provide proper escort. This is considered to be a repeat violation, (reference Inspection Report No. 50-266/92017(DRSS);

50-301/92017[DRSS]). One licensee identified violation pertaining to a

'

degraded protected area barrier was noted. This violation is not being cited i because the criteria specified in Section VII.B of the General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions of the Enforcement Policy were satisfied. One Inspection Followup Item, regarding a procedure ,

'

deficiency in the site access authorization program was also identifie Overall,_however, the security program was effective. Management attention and support for the program, security related modifications, and audit responsibilities were appropriately directed and usually resulted in effective implementation of day-to-day security requirement Inspection results showed 9401040252 931217 gDR ADOCK 05000266 PDR L

p

,- I

-

\

i

.

effective implementation in maintaining vital area barrier physical integrity, ;

isolation zones and assessment aids. Protected area barriers were generally

'

being maintained in an effective manner. Non-programmatic isolated weaknesses were identified regarding the degradation of one small portion of the protected area barrier, failure by a plant employee to provide a level of

. continuous escort and a procedure deficiency in the licensee's access authorization program. However, these inspection findings did not result in a !

significant reduction in the total effectiveness of the licensee's security progra i

!

!

l l

i

2