ML20133N357

Rev 2 to TDP.6, Evaluation & Rev of Training Programs

ML20133N357
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	01/07/1985
From:	SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20133N317	List: ML20133N315 ML20133N326 ML20133N336 ML20133N337 ML20133N344 ML20133N352 ML20133N357 ML20133N364 ML20133N366 ML20133N373 ML20133N376 ML20133N386 ML20133N397
References
TAC-57407, TDP.6, NUDOCS 8508130461
Download: ML20133N357 (12)

Text

.

NOT A CONTROLLED i n , 7 85

'Q COPY sg

~

TOP.6 EVALUATION AND REVISION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS 1.0 PURPOSE To provide for the evaluation of training programs under the cognizance of the Nuclear Training Superintendent in accoraance witn NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (AP.700J.

2.0 REFERENCES

.1 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM TAP.700)

.2 Criteria, INPO 82-011 3.0 PROCEDURE

.1 Training programs shall oe evaluatea annually as directed by the Nuclear Training Superintendent.

u .1 Program evaluations shall aaaress the rollowing areas as a minimum:

.1 Achievement of stated goals ano objectives and their applicability.

.2 Compatibility of the trainees and the program.

.3 Sequence or instruction and time allocations.

.4 Instractional methods and materials and facilities.

.2 Programs will receive inputs from the following:

k .1 Feedback from RECOGNIZING NEED FOR TRAINING (TOP.11).

Q .2 FEE 08ALK - JOB SUPERVISud'S COMMENTS (Enclosure 2).

N .3 FEEDBACK - TRAINEE COMMENTS (Enclosure 3).

.4 Program quiz ano examination results.

.5 Feedback from program instructors.

.2 Evaluation findings arid recorwenaations sna11 oe recurueu on Enclosure 1 and retainea in the training division master files in accordance with TRAINIhG DIVISION RELORD KEEPlau tTUP.7).

(]

TDP.6-1 8508130461 850B00 2 PDR ADOCK 0500 ,

V

,!J', .,

PROCEDURES (Continued) h ')

2.2 .1 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall review evaluation resuits and assign responsibility for necessary prograra revisions. Revisions shall be maae in accordance with DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLDIENTATION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND MATERIALS (TDP.5).

Revisions will be initiated by submitting Enclosure 4.4, completed with sufficient details to the cognizant training supervisor for review. Revisions other than Editorial in nature snall receive the 2a sana review and approval as the original accument. Editorici changes may be approved by the cognizant training supervisor.

Enclosure 4.4 shall serve as the recora of revision approval. The completed uriginal will be' retained in cnronological oraer following the prograd or program segment cover sheet f ri the master files. Each

,cov r sheet will reflect use latest revision number.

Revision of a program or portion of a prograu will not require Plant Review Cocunittee ana/or plant Superintencent approval unless there is a station license requirement defined by Technical Specifications.

The Nuclear Training Superintendent may request a review of arty program revision.

.2 Upon completion of program modifications a cescription of tiie modifications and any other actions taken as a result or the evaluation shall De entered on Enclosure 1. gx

.)

4.0 ENCLOSURE

.1 Training Program Review and Evaluation

.2 Feedback - Job Supervisor's Comments

.3 Feedback - Trainee Coments

.4 Training Program Change Approval Fona l

i )

Rev. 2 '

TDP.6-2

O ENCLOSURE 4.1 Page 1 of 3 TRAINING PROGRAM EVALUATION

.1 Title and number of program being evaluated.

.2 Does the conduct of the training program meet its stated goals and obj ectives.

YES NO. If N0, explain each exception.

.1 List program goals. ,

.2 For each goal: Does training program achieve this goal. (Yes/No)

.3 Summarize evidence contained in FEEDBACK - J08 SUPERVISOR'S COMMENTS and FEEDBACK - TRAINEE COMMENTS on which this conclusion is based.

A A/

.3 Is the program compatible with trainees enrolled.

YES NO If NO, explain.

.4 Has the development and modification of the program content been in accordance with DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND REVISION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND MATERIALS (TDP.5).

YES NO If NO, explain.

l 0

TDP.6-3 f

i .

i_

u_

ENCLOSURE 4.1 Page 2 of 3.

• g~/)

Based on program results, has the sequence of. instruction and the time

.5 allocations been satisfactory.

YES NO If NO, explain.

.6 Based on program results, has the instructional methods and materials been sati sfacto,'y.

YES NO If NO, explain.

.7 Based on feedback from trainees' supervisor, did the program meet the needs of trainee's division (Enclosure 4.2, Feedback - Job Supervisor Comments).

l YES NO If NO, explain.

.8 Is feedback from on-the-job performance used to help determine program content (Enclosure 4.2, Feedback - Job Supervisor Comments).

YES NO If NO, explain.

TDP.6-4 e

ENCLOSURE 4.1 '

Page 3 of 3 ,

.9 Based on 2-8 above, the following findings and recommendations are made.

.1 Findings.

.2 Recommendations.

.3 Signature of Evaluator ( )

Title Date

,( J - .10 The following change (s) to the training program is/are assigned to for implementation.

Target date for completion Nuclear Training Superintendent Date

.11 Section 10 above has been satisfactorily accomplished.

Nuclear Training superintendent Date Forward this enclosure to the Training Division master files when leted. Include all Feedback data forms utilized in the

() compuation.

eva TDP .6-5

ENCLOSURE 4.2 Page 1 of 2 gj FEEDBACK - JOB SUPERVISOR'S COMMENTS Operations Maintenance Sih.e Support Training Supervisor (Print)

. ,o . -

dob Supervisor (Print) Title Iraining Program Name and Number This evaluation is to be conducted jointly by the Job and Training Supervi sors.

Feedback concerning: Training conducted Training need

.1 Based on training conducted, is trainee job perfomance satisfactory.

Yes' No NA Comments:

.2 Based on job perfomance, does new or additional trainir.g need to be conducted. . Yes _

No NA Comments:

/  !

Job Supervisor Date

/

Training Supervisor Date O

TDP.6-6

O- ENCLOSURE 4.2 Page 2 of 2 .

.3 Recommended action:

A Training Supervisor Date.

4 Action required:

a

/

Assigned to Target date for completion

<-O Nuclear Training Superintendent Date

.5 Action completed.

l l

l Nuclear Training Superintendent Date l

l l Attach this completed form to the applicable Training Program Evaluation, TDP.6, Enclosure 4.1.

O TDP.6-7 l

l

ENCLOSURE 4.3 g ',,

Page 1 of 3 FEEDBACK - TRAINEE COMFENTS

.1 Program and course Name and Number Date

.2 Did the training meet you- needs as you understand them.

YES N0 l Comments: (Be specific)

I

.3 Were the methods of instruction satisfactory.

YES NO Consnents:

.)

If unsatisfactory, what is needed to improve.

l

.4 Was the sequence of instruction satisfactory.

YES NO Comments:

If unsatisfactory, what is needed to improve.

G

'l TDP.6-8

ENCLOSURE 4.3 Page 2 of 3

.5 Was the level of instruction satisfactory. .

Too hard Too easy Just right Comments:

.6 Was the quantity and quality of training aids satisfactory.

YES NO Comments:

.7 Were classroom / training facilities / conditions (lighting, seating, ventilation, etc.) satisfactory.

YES NO Comments:

1

.8 Other comunents/ suggestions.

i l

1

- NOTE: Criticism is most welcome when accompanied l

hy suggestions for improvement. '

l

([3)

TDP.6-9

ENCLOSURE 4.3 Page 3 of 3 lll -

.9 Reviewed by:

Program / course instructors:

Instructor Date

, Instructor Date Instructor Date A summary review of all trainee comments for a specific course will be developed and attached to the applicable Training Program Evaluation, TDP.6, Enclosure 4.1.

e)

Training Supervisor. Date O '

TDP.6-10

Enc!osure 4.4

', Page 1 of 2 RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION NO.1 TRAINING PROGRAM CHANGE APPROVAL FORM Program (Segment) No.:

Title:

Revision No.:

Originator: Date:

Training Supervisor: Date:

Editoriai: Yes Approved: Date:

Nuclear Training Suot.

Recommend approval by Plant Review Committee: /

Requested change (continue on page 21:

Reason for change (continue on page 2):

Reviewed: Date:

Plant Review Committee Recommend approval: Yes No N/A Approved: Yes No N/A Plant Suot.

Date:

NRC approval received on site: Yes No N/A Date:

Nuclear Training Swot. I l

Rey, 1 TOP.6-11 ,

.- .. . . . . . - . - - _ _ - . _ - , . . - - - .. _- 1

Enclosure 4.4 Page 2 of 2 RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION NO.1 TRAINING PROGRAM CHANGE APPROVAL FORM regram No.: Revision No.:

Recuested enange (continued):

Reason for change (continued):

4 I

f Rev. 1 U

_O ICP.6.12