ML20133N376

TDP.10, Contracted Training

ML20133N376
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	04/12/1983
From:	SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20133N317	List: ML20133N315 ML20133N326 ML20133N336 ML20133N337 ML20133N344 ML20133N352 ML20133N357 ML20133N364 ML20133N366 ML20133N373 ML20133N376 ML20133N386 ML20133N397
References
TDP.10, NUDOCS 8508130470
Download: ML20133N376 (4)

Text

.

~

NOT A 83 CONTROLLED 8"rd n

<0 COPY 7838$

TDP.10 CONTRACTED TRAINING l

1.0 PURPOSE To ensure the training conducted by vendors or contracted trainers meets the division needs and accredited standards.

2.0 REFERENCES

.1 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (AP.700).

.2 Criteria, INPO 82-011.

'3.0 PROCEDURE

.1 Contracted training conducted as a component of an accredited program of the Nuclear Training Division must meet the goals and objectives of that program.

.2 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall ensure that these programs are evaluated in the following areas to ensure they meet program requirements.

.1 Program content. -

. P. Qualification of instructors.

.3 Method of instruction.

4 Instructional materials.

.5 Method of trainee evaluation.

.6 Evaluation of training.

.3 Evaluation of contracted training conducted as part of an accredited program shall be conducted on an annual basis. The evaluation shall be conducted at the vendor's training site.on at least a biennial basis.

4 Findings and recommendations of the evaluations shall be recorded on Enclosure 1.

.1 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall review evaluation results.

.2 Actions taken to rectify identified deficiencies shall be recorded on Enclosure 1.

~

O

_ TDP.10-1 i 8508130470 850808 i PDR ADOCK 05000312 l

V PDR

l

., t . ,.

' ; ;! ' f I: (~ "}

$'s f PROCEDURE (Continued) 3:4 .3 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall review and approve these corrective actions.

4.0 ENCLOSURES .

.1 CONTRACTED TRAINING REVIEW AND EVALUATION.

+

e;,

l l

l l

l O -

TDP.10-2 I

.-O ~cactosuac 4.1 Page 1 of 2 CONTRACTED TRAINING REVIEW AND EVALUATION

1. Training conducted by contractor / vendor - Division Address / Phone Number

2. Training conducted at Location

3. . Training conducted as part of Program Name and Number

4. Does the content of the training meet the goals and obje'ctives of applicable program.

YES NO If NO, explain.

S. Is training conducted by qualified instructnrs.

YES NO Explain basis for answer (attach instructor profile if needed).

6. Are the instructional methods effective and consistent with the subject raterial.

3 YES NO

[

Explain basis for answer.

l l

1

7. Do instructional materials and facilitief meet. accredited standards.

l YES NO Explain basis for answer. .

O l '--

TDP.10-3

ENCLOSURE 4.1 Page 2 of 2 ,

8. Summarize trainee reaction to the training. Attach Enclosure 4.3, ' ~

EVALUATION AND REVISION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS (TDP.6), if needed.

9. Based on 4-8 above does the training meet accredited standards.

YES NO If no, list each area not meeting standards and make recommendations for needed changes, modifications or improvements necessary to achieve accredited standards. (Use extra sheets as necessary.)

10.

Signature of Evaluator Date

11. Action requested of Vendor / Contractor Nuclear Training Superintendent 9)

12. Action completed by Vendor / Contractor .

~

Nuclear Training Superintendent

13. Training recommended for future use.

l YES NO Explain basis for recommendation on separate sheet and . attach to this

! enclosure.

I Division Superintendent advised Yes No Plant Superintendent advised l Yes No I

I Nuclear Training Superintendent Forward this enclosure to the Training Division Master File when completegggg l END I

TDP.10-4 l

e