ML20133N344

Rev 2 to TDP.4, Development & Evaluation of Training Div Staff

ML20133N344
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	01/04/1985
From:	SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20133N317	List: ML20133N315 ML20133N326 ML20133N336 ML20133N337 ML20133N344 ML20133N352 ML20133N357 ML20133N364 ML20133N366 ML20133N373 ML20133N376 ML20133N386 ML20133N397
References
TDP.4, NUDOCS 8508130457
Download: ML20133N344 (3)

Text

-

NOT A. oi_g,_,,

Rev. 2 CONTROLLED WP0374P

-O COPY 0-00i.P TOP.4

• DEVELOPMENT ANO EVALUATION OF TRAINING 0! VISION STAFF 1.0 PURPOSE To provide for the development and maintenance of an effective and qualified training division instructional staff.

2.0 REFERENCES

.1 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (AP.700).

.2 Criteria, INPO 82-011 (5-82).

3.0 PROCEDURE

.1 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall establish and implement an initial and continuing training program for instructional staff members in accordance with NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (AP.700) and DEVELOPMENT AN0 IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS ANO NATERIALS

(

(TOP.5).

.1 The training program for the training division instructional staff shall be evaluated in accordance with EVALUATION AN0 REVISION OF TRAINING PROGRAMS (TOP.6).

.2 The Nuclear Training Superintendent shall ensure that classroom

! performance of instructional staff members is evaluated annually in t

addition to other performance evaluations.

l

.1 The classroom performance of each instructor shall be assessed as part of the annual performance evaluation using Enclosure 1.

.2 Tne completed Enclosure 1 shall be retained in the individual instructors training record and in the training division master' files in accordance with TRAINING DIVISION RECORO KEEPING (TOP.7).

2+ .3 Annual instructor training evaluation results shall be used as a basis for each instructors continuing training for the following

• year.

4.0 ENCLOSURES

.1 Lecture Evaluation Form Rev. 2 O 0508130457 050008 TOP.4-1 PDR ADOCK 05000312 V PDR

ENCLOSURE 4.1 age 1 of 2 LECTURE EVALUATION FORM i

&)

INSTRUCTOR'S N AM E: DATE:

LESSON TITLE: LESSON PLAN NUMBER:

CLASS SIZE: LOCATION:

EVALUATOR'S NAME:

COURSE TITLE:

NUCLEAR TR AINING SUPERINTENDENT: OVERALL EVALUATION:

5 1- -

s w u=. a. Notes INSTRUCTOR:

Personal Traits A. Appearance B. Enthusiasm C. Choice. use of word g.

D.

E.

Enunciation Quality, volume of voice W}

F. Eye contact G. Body Mennerisms Reistionship with Studentr.

A. Distribution of questions. attentioi B. Knowledge of names C. Class control D. Attentive to feedback E. Responsive to needs, difficulties F. Tact G. Use of humor LESSON:

Introduction:

A. Establish learning ge4's B. Motivation, interest arousal C. Establish relevance,importance of topic e i Rev. 1 TDP.4-2

Page 2 of 2 ENCLOSURE 4.1 (Continued)

LECTURE EVALUATION FORM

,- l f i

1 ua 1 .i c u.

i

a. Notes Presentation:

A. Logical B. Carity of explanation C. Explanation of unf amiliar terms D. Attention to previous knowledge level of students E. Effective utilization of training aids F. Questioning technique G. Emphasis on 'why' and ' application' H. Accuracy of technical content

1. Allow for preper note taking Conclusion / Evaluation:

A. Adequacy of surnmary B. Accomplishment of the objectives P. ; - _2 r:

A. Clarity of objectives B. Choice of methods and materials C. Readiness of equipment, f acilities D. Quality of handeuts, transparencies, etc.

General Cherosteristics:

A. Use of lesson plan B. Use of available time EVALUATOR'S

GENERAL COMMENT

S:

O END Rev. 1 TDP.4-3

_ _ _ _ _ _ _