ML20212D979
| ML20212D979 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1987 |
| From: | Daverio C, Watts R LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212D309 | List: |
| References | |
| OL-5, NUDOCS 8703040246 | |
| Download: ML20212D979 (55) | |
Text
-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-5
) (EP Exercise)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
j Unit 1) )
LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION EX 47 (Registration, Monitoring, and Decontamination of Evacuees from Special Facilities) i
)
Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street
)
P.O. Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 February 27,1987
)
)
0703040246 870227 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G PDR
)
i l
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
)
In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-5
) (EP Exercise)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
) Unit 1) )
LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION EX 47 (Registration, Monitoring, and Decontamination
) of Evacuees from Special Facilities)
)
Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street
)
P.O. Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 February 27,1987
)
)
3 LILCO, FG;bruary 27,1987
] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board D 4 In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-5
)(EP Exercise)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station )
3 Unit 1) )
LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION EX 47 s (Registration, Monitoring, and Decontamination of Evacuees from Special Facilities)
D
- 1. Q. Please state your narae and business address.
A. (Daverio] My name is Charles A. Daverio; my business address is Long Island Lighting Company, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, P.O. Box 628, 3
Wading River, New York 11752.
(Watts] 'My name is Richard J. Watts; my business address is 404 Bluhm g Road, Fairport, New York,14450.
- 2. Q. What are your professional qualifications related to Contention EX 47?
A. [Daveriol My full professional qualifications have been provided sepa-C rately in the bound volume titled " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witnesses on Exercise Contentions." I am employed by Long Island
(
l Lighting Company ("LILCO") as Assistant Department Manager, Nuclear C 13 Operations Support Department. I have supervised various aspects of i <.
LILCO's emergency planning efforts at Shoreham Nuclear Power Station since Jaauary,1980. During the February 13,1986 Exercise I was the e Lead Controller for the Local Emergency Response Organizatica (LERO).
O s
I #
l
)
(Watts] My full professional qualifications have been provided separately
)-
in the bound volume titled " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witness-es on Exercise Contentions." I am employed by LILCO as a radiological consultant on emergency planning matters. During the February 13, 1986
)
Exercise I was the Radiation Health Coordinator for LERO.
Introduction
- 3. Q. Please summarim the issues raised in Contention EX 47.
A. (Daverio, Watts] Contention EX 47 alleges that on the day of the Exer-cise, LILCO did not demonstrate the ability to register, monitor, and decontaminate evacuees from special facilities or that this activity could be accomplished in a timely fashion; that the LILCO Plan does not include provisions for reception centers for evacuees from special facilities; and that Revision 7 (Rev. 7) changes to the LILCO Plan are inadequate to remedy these deficiencies. A complete text of Contention EX 47 is At-tachment A to this testimony.
k
- 4. Q. Please summarize your testimony on these issues.
A. (Daverio, Watts] On the day of the Exercise, LERO workers demon-strated the organizational capability to protect special facility popula-
)
tions during an emergency. They demonstrated the ability to evacuate special f acility populations by gathering and transmitting essential infor-mation, dispatching vehicles to special f acilities, and directing the dis-
)
patch of monitors to special facility reception centers designated in the LILCO Plan. Although LERO workers did not simulate or actually per-form the registration, monitoring, and decontamination of any special f a-
)
cility residents, that does not mean they are incapable of performing
)
) ~
these functions. The process of registering, monitoring, and decon-
)
taminating is similar, regardless of the population being processed. The same LERO workers who would have registered, monitored, and decontaminated special facility evacuees monitored several hundred indi-
)
viduals accurately and efficiently at the Emergency Worker Decon-tamination Facility (EWDF) at Brentwood. Therefore, we conclude that on the day of the Exercise LERO demonstrated the organizational capabil-
)
ity and resources, and the technical competence to protect special f acill-ty populations during an emergency.
Finally, Revision 7, which was responsive to comments by the Re-
)
gional Assistance Committee and not, as Intervenors allege, to supposed flaws shown by the February 13,1986 Exercise, adequately addressed the needs of special facility populations. More recent modifications to the
)-
LILCO Plan provide additional details that resolve the issues raised by the Rev. 7 subsections of Contention EX 47.
) 5. Q What are the legal standards for the contention?
A. (Daverio, Watts] The applicable legal standards are:
10 C.F.R. S 50.47 (b)(1): Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee and by State and local organizations within the Emer-gency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emer-gency responsibilities of the various supporting orga-nizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a continuous
) basis.
10 C.F.R. S 50.47(b)(8): Adequate emergency f acili-ties and equipment to support the emergency are pro-vided and maintained.
) 10 C.F.R. S 50.47(b)(10): A range of protective ac-tions have been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public.
)
Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
s N U REG-0654.II.J.9: Each State and local organiza-
> tion shall establish a capability for implementing pro-tective measures based upon protective action guides and other criteria. This shall be consistent with the recommendations of EPA regarding exposure resulting from passage of radioactive airborne plumes,(EPA-
-520/1-75-001) and with those of DHEW(DHHS)/FDA
) regarding radioactive contamination of human food and animal feeds as published in the Federal Register of December 15,1978 (43 FR 58790).
N UREG-0654II.J.10.d: The organization's plans to im-s plement protective measures for the plume exposure J pathuy shall include: . . . Means for protecting those people whose mobility may be impaired due to such f actors as institutional or other confinement:
NUREG-0654 II.J.12.: Each organization shall de-scribe the means for registering and monitoring of
) evacuees at relocation centers in host areas. The per-sonnel and equipment available should be capable of monitoring within about a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> period all residents and transients in the plume exposure EPZ arriving at relocation centers.
February 13,1986 Exercise
- 6. Q. What procedures for registering, monitoring, and decontamination of evacuees from special f acilities were in effect on the day of the Exercise?
) A. (Daverio, Watts) The procedures in effect on the day of the Exercise that are specific to special facility residents were SS 3.2 and 5.1.5 of OPIP 3.9.2, which provide for dispatching monitoring personnel to special
) facility reception centers. Many of the monitoring procedures for the general population in OPIP 3.9.2, however, also apply to monitoring the special f acility population. The basic directions for using the monitoring
) instrument, an RM-14 with an HP-270 or HP-210 probe, are the same
)
i t
) regardless of the population being monitored. Obviously there will be
[
some variation because of the medical condition of individual special pop-ulation evacuees. Certain areas of the body which would normally be monitored may be inaccessible; but areas of the body that cannot be j reached by the monitoring instrument are highly unlikely to be reached by contamination. In addition, the RM-14 is a highly sensitive instrument ca-pable of detecting even slight traces of contamination. Thus, LERO's abil-
).
l ity to assess whether these individuals are contaminated and require more l detailed evaluation at a hospital is not impaired by their medical condi-tion.
l
- 7. Q. Was the ability to register, monitor, and decontaminate evacuees from special f acilities demonstrated in the February 13,1986 Exercise?
A. (Daverio, Watts] Yes. On the day of the Exercise LERO workers dem-
)
onstrated several aspects of the ability to register, monitor, and decontaminate evacuees from special f acilities. By demonstrating the preparatory step, evacuation, and by demonstrating the generic process of
)
monitoring, we are confident that LERO demonstrated its ability to pro-tect the special facility population in the event of a Shoreham emergen-cy.
l To place these events in perspective, it is important to bear in l- mind what would happen during a real emergency. Because special facili-ty populations will be indoors, they are less likely to become contaminated initially. In addition, when an evacuation is recommended, the resulting dose savings will outweigh the dose from contamination which might be retained on the body. In cases of minor contamination, decontamination
)
may require no more than removing blankets or outer clothing. Thus,
)
sound emergency planning dictates that LERO workers place primary em-3 phasis on evacuation procedures rather than on registration, monitoring, and decontamination procedures.
- 8. Q. What was FEMA Field Objective 13 on the day of the Exercise and how l was it demonstrated?
A. (Daverio] On the day of the Exercise, FEMA Field Objective 13 was j " Demonstrate a sample of the resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of the institutionalized mobility-impaired individuals within the 10-mile EPZ." FEMA Post Exercise Assessment at 14. During the Ex-g ercise, LERO workers demonstrated that expertise in several ways. At 9:58, in accordance with OPIP 3.6.5 SS 5.2.3.b. and 5.9.2, the Health Fa-cilities Coordinator notified the Special Facilities Evacuation Coordinator that health care facilities in the EPZ had been contacted to verify trans-3 portation requirements, relocation / reception centers, and other assis-tance. See Attachment B at B-1. Within half an hour the Special Facili-ties Coordinator notified the Evacuation Coordinator that the Home and Health Coordinators had begun contacting the health facilities in Zones l
A-M, Q, and R, advising them to evacuate, and had contacted the hospi-tals in those zones advising them to shelter, in accordance with OPIP 3.6.5 SS 5.2.3. and 5.9.2. See Attachment B at B-2.
LERO's organizational ability to effect an evacuation of special fa-cilities was further demonstrated when LERO workers dispatched six am-l bulances, six ambulettes, 45 buses, and eight vans to special f acilities, l
See Attachment C. (The buses and vans were simulated by having drivers drive their own cars.) FEMA observed two of these vehicles, which were dispatched in response to FEMA free play messages, an ambulance D
0- _7_
O. dispatched to Our Lady of Perpetual Help Convent to transport a resident to the Suffolk Developmental Center (see Attachment B at B-3), and an ambulette dispatched to the United Cerebral Palsy (UCP) residence to transp rt a resi&nt to the appropriate UCP residence outside the EPZ.
O See Attachment B at B-4. As documented in a letter written to me by Roger Kowleski on December 13, 1985, dispatching the ambulance and ambulette was all that was required to meet this objective. See Deposi-O-
tion Transcript of Charles A. Daverio, January 5,1987, Exhibit 5. at 4 (Attachment D).
O 9. Q. What steps did LERO take to prepare for registering, monitoring, and decontaminating the special facility population?
A. (Daverio, Watts) LERO's organizational ability to dispatch monitoring teams to special facilities in accordance with OPIP 3.9.2 5 5.1.5 was dem-O onstrated shortly before the Exercise ended. At 15:45, the Decon-tamination Coordinator ordered the Decontamination Leader to send mon-g itoring teams to the reception centers to which the special facilities would have been evacuated.
This demonstration goes beyond what FEMA has considered neces-sary at ther nuclear plants in New York State to demonstrate proficiency
- O in this area. I have read the deposition transcript of Mr. James Papile, Director of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group, a deposition
!g at which a member of my staff was present, in which Mr. Papile stated that the extent of participation by special facilities is normally no more l
l than the receipt of a phone call. See Papile Dep. Tr. at 69-70 Attachment E. N dem nstrad n f the abuhy to regBter, monkor, and decon-O taminate special facility residents is ever made with actual residents or at actual facilities in the State of New York. Nor is that ability simulated.
'O
- . . ~ .. -- _ ._ ._. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ . _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
F h l L
The issue of which objectives must be included in FEMA graded ex-
)'
ercises is the subject of Contentions EX 15 and 16. Therefore, it will be addressed in the testimony on those contentions.
- 10. Q. On the day of the Exercise, did LERO workers demonstrate monitoring techniques on individuals other than the special facility population?
A. [Daverio, Watts] On the day of the Exercise, LERO workers demon-i strated the ability to monitor several hundred emergency workers accu-
)
r rately and efficiently at the EWDF and in so doing demonstrated their knowledge of how to use the monitoring equipment. See FEMA Post-Exercise Assessment at 78. These are the same individuals who
) would monitor the special f acility evacuees, using the same equipment, an l
i .
RM-14 with the HP-210 or HP-270 probe, and the same method.
I LERO is composed of competent personnel who are capable of transferring their monitoring skills from one population to another, i
l LERO workers are also considerate of the impaired mobility of special f a-cility residents. These and other special needs are continually being f ac-
) tored into LILCO's emergency planning process.
During the Exercise LILCO demonstrated both the organizational l capabilities and the technical competence to protect the special facility population in an emergency. Given the detailed planning LILCO has un-dertaken for evacuation and monitoring of the special facility population l and the actual demonstrations made on the day of the Exercise, we are
) confident of LERO's ability to do all that is necessary to protect these in-dividuals in the event of an emergency at Shoreham.
)
) _9
- 11. .Q. What was FEMA Field Objective 21 on the day of the Exercise and how
- k. was it demonstrated?
A. [Daverio] On the day of the Exercise, FEMA Field Objective 21 was
" Demonstrate the adequacy of procedures for registration, radiological
) monitoring, and decontamination of evacuees and vehicles including ade-quate provisions for handling contaminated waste at the Reception Cen-ter." FEMA Post-Exercise Assessment at 15. The process of registering, I monitoring, and decontaminating different groups, the general population -
at the Nassau Coliseum and the emergency workers at the EWDF, was ad-equately demonstrated during the Exercise. Since the same organiza-
) tional capabilities and technical skills apply to processing special f acility populations, we do not believe this objective required more than LERO did on the day of the Exercise.
)
- 12. Q. What is your response to that portion of the contention which argues that an additional 850 individuals would need to be registered, monitored, and decontaminated if hospitals were evacuated?
A. [Daverio, Watts] Our response is that the subject of this litigation is events that occurred during the February 13,1986 Exercise and that hos-pital patients were not evacuated on that day. The Exercise scenario called for sheltering of hospital patients, a first-choice protective action that was approved by the Licensing Board in the litigation of the LILCO Plan. PID at 829. Therefore, no demonstration of hospital evacuation was sought during the Exercise and the number of patients that might be evacuated is not relevant to this contention.
)
)
r i ..
CONTENTION EX 47.A - E
- 13. Q. Please summarize the issues in the various subsections of Contention EX 47.A - E.
A. ( Daverio, Watts] All of these contention subsections take issue with the proposals for registering, monitoring, and decontaminating evacuees from special facilities that are set out in Revision 7 to the Plan, rather than with events that occurred on the day of the Exercise. Contention EX 17.A argues that the number of monitors assigned to each reception cen-ter is insufficient. Contention EX 47.B argues that evacuees should not be monitored as they are leaving their buses, ambulances, or ambulettes.
Contention EX 47.C alleges that bus drivers are not capable of keeping monitoring records. Contention EX 47.D argues that contaminated evacuees should not be sent to the Nassau Coliseum for decontamination.
Contention EX 47.E argues that school children must be monitored at re-ception centers in order to comply with'NUREG-0654 5 II.J.12.
j 14. Q. Please summarize your testimony on these issues.
A. (Daverio, Watts] Revision 7 has been superseded by the February 20,1987 draf t proposal which is Attachment F to this testimony. This proposal
) clarifles procedures for registering, monitoring, and decontaminating evacuees from special facilities, taking account of the special needs of these individuals. Two of the issues raised by the contention subsections
) are not affected by the draf t proposal: recordkeeping by busdrivers, and monitors for school reception centers. Contrary to the contention, drivers of emergency vehicles are competent to record the names of special fa-cility evacuees, and LILCO's decision not to send monitors to school re-ception centers is sound.
l D
O 11_
Designated nece ti n center
.O
- 15. Q. What is the new proposal for registering, monitoring, and decontaminating individuals evacuated f rom special f acilities?
A. (Daverio, Watts] This proposal responds to the comment in the February O 12, 1986 RAC review that there was no way to determine whether the number of monitors allotted to special facility evacuees was sufficient since the total number of reception centers had not yet been determined.
O The February 20 draft proposal routes all 1600 special facility evacuees identified in the LILCO Plan through the Emergency Worker Decon-tamination Center (EWDF) at Brentwood. All special f acility evacuees will O be registered and monitored in the vehicles in which they arrive at the EWDF. Uncontaminated evacuees will then be driven to relocation cen-ters without having to exit the ambulances, ambulettes, or buses in which O they arrive.
, Of the approximately 1600 special facility evacuees identified in the LILCO Plan, about half are non-ambulatory and half are ambulatory.
.O Contaminated non-ambulatory evacuees will be sent to local hospitals for decontamination. Each of these hospitals, identified in OPIP 3.7.1 Rev. 4, is accredited by the Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospi-O tals.
Contaminated ambulatory evacuees will be decontaminated in a l separate area in the EWDF set aside for that purpose. An elevator at the
- O EWDF will transport ambulatory special facility evacuees who have diffi-culty going up and down stairs.
- O
'O
)
t j Number of Monitors
- 16. Q. Under the February 20,1987 draf t proposal how many monitors will be available to assist in the registering and monitoring of special facility evacuees?
A. [Daverio, Watts] Under the February 20,1987 draf t proposal, at least 30 monitors will be available for the sole purpose of registering and mont-toring special f acility evacuees. Thus, one monitor will be available for approximately 55 special facility evacuees, until emergency workers begin
)
arriving at the EWDF. Given this ratio, even if all special facility evacuees arrived at the EWDF at the same time, they could be processed in less than two hours.
)
Monitorint and Decontamination Prneerkres
- 17. Q. How will special facility evacuees be monitored and decontaminated ac-j cording to LILCO's draf t proposals?
A. ( Daverio, Watts] Under this proposal, special facility evacuees will be monitored while in their vehicles, instead of being monitored as they exit the vehicles. This way, LERO need not move non-ambulatory people
)
unnecessarily. Special facility evacuees who are not contaminated are immediately driven to relocation centers without being exposed to ad-verse weather conditions. Contaminated evacuees would only be exposed to the weather for the moments between exiting the vehicles and enter-ing the facility. Since only ambulatory evacuees will be decontaminated at Brentwood, the amount of time required to move from vehicles to the
)
f acility should be brief.
m f ) Reristration Procedures
- 18. Q. Do you agree that drivers of emergency vehl_cles are not capable of regis-tering special f acility evacuees?
A. (Daverio, Watts] No. Registration of evacuees requires only that drivers
) of emergency vehicles record the name of each evacuee. This task re-quires no special training or equipment. LERO monitors are trained to su-pervise drivers in this recordkeeping function. The necessary materials,
) paper and pencils, are supplied to LERO monitors at the EWDF. This divi-sion of labor works especially well because the LERO monitor has only one function to perform: accurate monitoring of special facility evacuees. It
) also makes efficient use of the driver's time, which would otherwise be spent waiting idly for monitoring to be completed before driving the evacuees to their relocation centers.
School Receotion Centers
- 19. Q. What provisions are made in the LILCO Plan for registering, monitoring, and decontamination of school children?
) A. (Daverio, Watts) Under the LILCO Plan, if early dismissal of schools is ordered, as it was during the February 13,1986 Exercise, children will be returned home so that they can travel to reception centers with their
) parents. If an evacuation is ordered but early dismissal is not, school chil-dren from schools in the EPZ will be transported to schools outside the EPZ. In this situation, children will also be picked up by the parents. The children are then monitored at reception centers,in accordance with the
! procedures for monitoring the general population.
l l
t-- _ _ _ ,,_. _ - ~ _ - - . _ , , _ . . _ _ . , , _ . _ . . , _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ , _ . _ ,_ _ - __ _ ,__
O O
O O
O ATTACHMENT A O
O
!O
.O O
O
Attachment A i
Contention EX 47. The exercise revealed a fundamental flaw in the LILCO Plan in that LILCO failed to demonstrate the ability to register, monitor and decontaminate evacuees from special facilities who are transported to reception centers other than the Nassau Coliseum, or that such activities could be accomplished within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> as required by NUREG 0654 S II.J.12. Thus, LILCO has not satisfied objectives FIELD 13 and 21, and the exercise precludes a fir. ding that the LILCO Plan complies with 10 CFR S 50.47(b)(1),(b)(8). (b)(10) and NUREG 0654 S II.J.9.10, and 12.
According to the estimates in the Plan, if there were an evacuation of the entire EPZ, there could be as many as 1600 residents of nursing and adult homes, health care and other special facilities, all with special needs, requiring that they be sent to special reception facilities (OPIP 3.6.5, Att. 2), plus tens of thousands of school children. This number could be increased by approximately 850 persons if the hospitals in the EPZ and the Suffolk Infirmary also were evacuated. Ld. The LILCO Plan, Rev. 6, which was the subject of the exercise, has no provision for the registration, radiological monitoring or decontamination of such individuals; nor does it include provisions for reception centers ;
for the vast majority of such individuals, or agreements indicating that any such recep-
)
tion centers are in fact available or adequate to serve that purpose. Rather, it includes registration, radiological monitoring and decontamination procedures to be imple- I mented, and equipment and personnel to be present, only at the Nassau Coliseum and the Emergency Worker Decontamination Center. OPIP 4.2.3 OPIP 4.3.1. This is a def t- )
ciency in the Plan which violates NUREG 0654 S II.A.3, J.10.d and 12, and 10 CFR I
S 50.47(b)(8) and (b)(10), it precludes a finding that the LILCO Plan is adequate, or that '
there is reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a Shoreham emergency as required by 10 CFR S 50.47(a)(1).
Furthermore, the proposal in the new Revision 7 version of OP!P 4.3.1, purport-edly to address this deficiency (sm letter dated June 20,1986, from John D. Leonard to
O Harold Denton, (SNRC-1270), and Att. I at 4), fails to correct this deficiency for the O
following reasons:
EX 47.A. The proposal to send only one monitor to each special facility recep-tion center - assuming arguendo reception centers existed - is unworkable. See OPIP 4.3.15 5.1.6 (Rev. 7). For example, one of the few special facility reception centers designated by LILCO is expected to receive up to 465 evacuees. OPIP 3.6.5, Att. 2.
One person could not adequately or effectively perform the necessary monitoring, recordkeeping, and related activities that would be required at such a center.
EX 47.B. The proposal to have monitoring done as evacuees leave their buses, ambulances or ambulettes (m OPIP 4.3.15 5.4.9.c (Rev. 7)) is unworkable. It could not
',0 be done in inclement weather, there is no assurance that reception centers -- assuming arguendo they existed - would be laid out to permit such activities at unloading points, and the evacuees, who by definition have special needs, cannot be subjected to waits in O
buses or ambulances while lines of others arriving ahead of them are monitored by one i
LERO worker.
EX 47.C. The proposal to have bus drivers keep necessary monitoring records
.O (m OPIP 4.3.1 $ 5.4.9.c (Rev. 7)) is unworkable. Such personnel have not been trained for such a function, nor have they been properly equipped to fulfill it. It is also im-practical to expect a bus driver to be able to perform such a function.
t.o EX 47.D. The proposal to have persons found to be contaminated "get back on the bus" and eventually driven to the Nassau Coliseum (s_e_e OPIP 4.3.1. 5 5.4.9.d (Rev.
7)) is unworkable Impractical and dangerous. The evacuees at special facility recep-
~,O tion centers are, by definition, in need ci special care that cannot be provided at the Nassau Coliseum. To refuse to deccataminate them, and instead to send them to a fa-t cility that is not equippped to handle their special needs, and in the process delay their O
decontamination and also expose them to other contaminated people on the bus, thus potentially increasing their exposure, is without justification.
.O
O -
EX 47.E. The provision that it is not necessary to provide monitoring personnel at reception centers for schools (seg OPIP 4.3.1. S 5.1.5 (Rev. 7)) is wholly inadequate.
Assuming arguendo that such reception centers exist - and they do not - there is no basis for LILCO's refusal to provide radiological monitoring and decontamination ser-vices to the school children evacuees who would be taken there. This refusal is a clear violation of NUREG 0654 S II.J.12. Furthermore, the LILCO explanation that such ser-vices are not necessary "if the parents are going to be picking up the children," makes no sense, and f alls to correct the deficiency.
Finally, during the exercise, messages apparently were transmitted among cor-tain LILCO players referring to requests that monitoring personnel be sent to certain hospitals and facilities outside the EPZ. The exercise failed to demonstrate, however, that LILCO is capable of providing registration and monitoring at actual reception cen-ters for actual evacuees with special needs during a real emergency, since: (a) such personnel were not actually sent to any special reception center facilities during the exercise (all the referenced facilities were only " simulated" reception centers in any event since none of them participated in the exercise); and (b) there was no demonstra-tion that the LILCO personnel were capable of (1) performing the necessary registration and monitoring of the number of evacuees with special needs likely to be taken to such f acilities, or (11) otherwise properly implementing necessary procedures for registering, monitoring and decontaminating evacuees at such f acilities, even assuming arguendo that f acilities for use as special f acility reception centers exist. Accordingly, the exer-else precludes a finding of reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a Shoreham accident, as required by 10 CFR S 50.47(a)(1).
O O
________.___a
O O
O t
O 1
4
- O ATTACHMENT B iO l
I
'l
- O i
'O l
O O
O
O '"-
o-~*-
Attachment B OFIF 4.1.2 Page 6 of 7
.n V
Attachment i Page 1 of 1 ff/$k h$$ ~
o ' . y . . ,. . , c,,m = "w" = v
- No. d2 L.ocation i Name
~
Luv rnre 1 l Trom: 'e'
- ~:'c r_ e a fCC
'O r ar r ri et r~ii v G ,'.. FCC To:
Date/ Time: 6957 pit!/r(-
Message:
/$ rarM dr 6 /4~ter s! $/In" Or/t / fit ~.S
/cu r///n f-nrs~ A n ru G /M ie 3rt~n d.* ~rn.* ~r d A rib .
r i- 7*esi r-q pr t re, r 2 t....,, !vo. ,.rr ,
.at- --sp ,.m w-n>p.</A ri n
, ,,y ,
lO p_ , . ,, .,, , , p . , ,. .,. .
.,,,7.,,..,.,,.
M/'f f~
'O ?//f2f" /tJAC'A' /?O /)DD/?~/O///1 6 72/ ins /M27W7~/0h PJ'Gt/ iPf'/ttf*/)7T.
- O-t (O Routing for
- l(( Action lElInformation i
Response Required: ([l l .
l In Response to Message No. _
O (Signature)
White copy - Addressee Rev. 5 Yellow copy - Originator Pink COPY - Lead Communicator O
l
v .
O .
l
/
OPIP 4.1.2 !
/ // ) /klgW Pege 6 ot 1 Attachment 1 O y ,, t og 1
, .- 3 f{j e '
z.
LIto MESSAGE FORN
, , .i -
- O .. 1 .
no. 3 .
L.E.K U 1LCle 1,0C & C lon ( Name Froa* Ni # 8" " -7. 'N/fY [M .._ _
10 To: A*.'XtY (M 2 l~6'[
Dateliime: ' ' t' : 54 y .W
'45.., ,<. <./ c's.s/4V Heesage: ./Nar A.b /le. /Sy/m /*/ j.6 o .Z< Ah. +:/ mW . /A , . , . i . ).. s.e., if. e' /, ' & -
//f /*'>s. lao uf ,
/? / //l'.S bsi.l1by
- . A i d;.f'.,
- O .
f/s}X4'Y *n**l ';'WSWl$<,.k$/ , < a ,J?am . .hi())l y, ,,,..,()
A Y /*?lt /< W ;. / / s ,' Y h r.
O 1
O - +
cr. f, ~ 4 r ' '. - ,
/. o
,s i
f Routins for: lZIAction Information
!O ,
I Response Required: l~_l In Response to Message No.
l (O
White copy - Addressee * (Sig(nature)
Yellow copy - Ori inator Rev. 5 Fink copy - Lead onsnunicator O - .
e e
,,--- ---- ,n--,.-- - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . . . . , , . , - - . . . , - . -
O , . .. .
- la ,
e 4 OPIP 4.1.2 Page 6 of 7 0 -
/4 ( Attachment 1 Pge l of i V
LO . .
M/.5 /J J [f g & LERO NESSAGE FORM No.' e/ '
h.. , ~) -
L.oc at s.on aame i rnu u.c te l fron: /h.?
- w ,Q e G i ., 7X ,
"O To: <..'Er D r & G .c: $~O C Dete/ Time: /34 d e'/ 2#4 Massase: Pre mv n r nu #44 O
//dd - n3 t a f G brY;t? t t t n t t' =~ lo'n e Ts\ # n u', T # e (~ th 7% '*
- r ' !
- 1 '. 4
, T-
. c brnrio .) !
^ I I' / n ( ^_ e r n r D i .- v,
.S .
.!o N . r I b e- r , . r e e r t)A r , , . r .- n-Mb Dt r e e is r-n T.) .
O O
l Routing for: l~_l Action l3{'Information Response Required: l_l O In Response to Message No. *
(Signature)
White copy - Addressee Rev. 5 Yellow copy - originator O Pink copy - Lead consnunicecor 9 .
) -
0FIP 4.1.2
) Fage 6 of 7 I(
f [ Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1
-)
/f /f h E/4 6 LERO MESSAGE FORM No.' e' 1 <
.',, Q' Name 4,oCaClon L.EA U 1LCle
) Frae: ?.%s'- A'.' / i'r FOC ,_
To: f @ A
- A*! ? ? c*n /~f.f Da'e/ Time: > 2: $ r ,* t 3CG Message: _
bc r n v n ',-o v N < /*
1114 - v3 r A Plc
} )i n R t u r r r r t o p - n '~t'!! r-drn rd //
- rrn :%t-ren e e
n,a m . . , ,o . a. r s e , y .. e .. n ..
D % w N rsin ei r r 7"o //CD Z?'r*< t n t vs' 4 111.~ni n / A -Tr,n v EP r
)
3 .
)
, Routing fort l[lAction lIlInformation Response Required: l[l
) Io Response to Message flo.
__(Signature)
/
White copy - Addressee Rev. 5
) -
Yellow copy - Originator Pink copy - Lead Conusunicator
O O
O O
O ATTACHMENT C O
O O
lO i
i iO i
- O
) p Attachm:nt C
, OPIP 3.6.5 Page 59 of 60 Attachment 16 Page 1 of 2 s
)
EOC/SFECIAL POPULATIONS BUS DISPATCHIR FATCHOGUE STAGING AREA
) DATE: /7/# 6 TIME: O 9 Y d' FROM: Transportation Support Coordinator -..
To: Special Populations Bus Dispatcher
) Prestage l Evacuate l_ l Zonas evacuated: M #[,u, - N
) Send /u Bus Drivers to U v,N,3 /wAm, Bus Co./ Yard to get buses g -
Send -
8us Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get buses
{ ,
Send Bus Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get buses Send f ' Van Drivers to /Afo /4,b,, s Bus Co./ Yard to get vans Send Van Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get vans Send Van Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get vans
) .
CUR 3 SIDE PICKUP - Assign drivers t'o the following route groups:
) Buses Vans
- 1. /3 b C 1. 8 5. 4 J
- 2. 6: 2. 4, 6.
- 3. 3. p .z.
) -
- 4. 4. #1 7.
4.
l 5.
)
( ' .
/l?p. ,, ,'o g a uN p s r- n v. s
) ,
i
O .
OFIP 3.6.5 Fage 60 of 60 Accachsene 16 0 ' Fage 2 of 2 BOC/5 FECIAL F0FULATIONS BUS DISPATCHER PATCEOGUE STAGING AREA (continued)
SPECIAL FACILITIES - Assign bus driver to the facilities checked off on the O following lise.
No . o f Buses Reception Zone Reo'd l Center Name o nesten ure racLLities A* 1 Suffolk Dev.
j l Association for Help of Retarded Child Center
- F 1 Our Lady of Perpetual Help Convent 2
'~["~" - Ridge Rest Home G
3 K
O woodhaven Nursins/ Adult Home K 2 LaSalle Mili-Oak Hollow / Crest Hall tary Academy
.~
L 1 Millcrest Adult Home F 2 14Salle Mili-
~~~~ Riverhead Nursing Home tary Academy I Q 2
- Maryhaven Center of Hope Q 1 O ~~
Sunrest Health Facilities Nursery Schools ""
- F 1 7 Alphabet 1and Child Enrichment Center R 2 Central Brookhaven Head Start K 1 O Caram Child Care Center M 2 Kid-K-Us Day Care M 1 f Middle Island Nursery School F 1 7 ,
St. Ansela's Nursery School E 1
- (, St. John's Pre-School F 1 r, Sound Beach Pre-School ,
G 1
- O & Step by Step Early Learning G 1 r_ f Trinity Lutheran Nursery School C 1
- iM Wading River Cooperative Play School
~ Parochial Schools **
- Q 9 O Infant Jesue School S 4
) St. Isidore School _-
Activated Transfer Points
/ / ""~'
Brkhvn Hulcipla qCin.<
'"7 Brookhaven Lab 7 Miller Place ~~~
Shirley Mall O ~
~""
Norwood Ave. ~
yCor u Plaza *
~~
1-ookha'ren Substation i_ , Doc ors Path
'~
1' ,t t
. :.: : .) s t a:isn l_
, ) ;
y . . .
O ,
Rev. 6
3 '#
.c -
h OPIP 3.6.5
\ Page 59 of 60 Attachment 16 3
Page 1 of 2 3
BOC/SPECIAL POPULATIONS BUS DISPATCHER
,, PATCHOGUE STAGING ARIA D
DATE:
TIME: !b ' !
FROM: Transportation Support Coordinutor To: Special Populations Bus Dispatcher
( )
D Frestage l l Evacuate l' l Zones evacuated: k TAO.0 L K , ,
.M ,o, Send M Bus Drivers toU pa-6A \ l\90AJY_3us Co./ Yard to get buses Send l Bus Drivers to Oun es D h Bus Co./ Yard to get buses
{
Send k Bus Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get buses O Send 1 Van Drivers to O MftGA h0%M Bus Co./ Yard to 3ee vans Send Van Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get vans Send Van Drivers to Eus Co./ Yard to get vans O '
CURSSIDE PICKUP - Assign drivers t'o the following route groups:
Buses Vans O
- 1. Y $ '
- 1. ( 5. D
- 2. $~O' / 2. 2"\.1 / 6. Mb
- 3. M .d 3. @ ~U t/ 7. @ l 8 4. CC, M M, ILN
- 4. /S J 8.
- s. "
tag opcit [-e 9 e i C[s PavP ', $ 90<. fAc_, MC uRev. 06 5 bM M \)M 5' A% h T O d 't i l . . ,s q ' ,u ; j {'-i,, y
. -ardsmTK'S g . .
)
OPIP 3.6.5 Page~ 60 of 60
)
l
,Attachmant 16 Page 2 of 2 EOC/SPECIAL 70FUL*.TIONS BUS DISPATCHER ,
FATCEOGUE STAGING AREA (continued)
) SPE(:IAL FACILITIES - Assign bus driver to the facilities checked of f on the Tollowing list.
'~~
No . .o f I
- Buses Reception Zone Req'd. Cancer Nace h Maalth Gare FacLLLties Suffolk Dev.
Association for Help of Retarded Child A* 1 l l . Cancet 2' 3, Our Lady of Farpetual Halo Convant
[
i G / l g Ridge Rest Home -
K Woodhaven Nursing / Adult Home '
'MSaile Hili-K Oak Hollow / Crest Hall cary Academy L @
Z M111 crest Adult Home Riverhead Nursing Uma F 1pt Lase.lla Mili-tary Academy 3
i
)
T Maryhaven Center of Hopf
'/ lQ l Q i
~52*
Sunrest Health Faci 1Leias -
Nursery Schools ""
Alphabet 1and Child Enrichment Center l F v i. >
S 29 Central Brookhaven Pasd Scart K Coram Child Care Center M
^ Kid R-Us Day Care M
/ Middle Island Nursery Schcol F. '
St. Anselm's Nursery School
(
< St. John's Fre School '
r F
Q '
3 ~2" Sound Beach Pre. School G
< Step by See Early learning G r x TrinityLuckeranNursetySchool C gl Wading River Cooperativa Play School
~
=
Parochial Schools ** -
g Q 9 '
x Infant Jesus School /f S St. Isidore School
.- -+ _
Activated Transfer Points
~7' Brkhvu Multipla gCL.g T Brookhaven Lab "7 Miller Place Shirley Mall 7: Nocdood Ave. 2 2
Coram Plass
, Middle !1*.i 2 7,' h v.. m : Sb s -
0.::*'h**
?
I i:.- g 9 ../ ., . ,
5 a.a.
9 , .
- '*af 00Nl y ,, , 3
'.A O -
- orir 3.6.5 Page 59 of 60
( Attachment 16
. Page 1 of 2 O acc/SPECIAL FOPULATIONS BUS DISPATCHER PATCHOGUE STAGING ARIA
/
om: 2. /3 fro rIxE: 7, O FROM: Yransportation Support Coordinator _
To: Special Populations Bus Dispatcher
, Prestage l l Evacuate l l Zones evacuated: // [ b [ d/, , k 8-v i
O Send 7 aus Drivers to 13o hc na,. aus Co./ Yard to set buses
{, Send Bus Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to'get buses Send Bus Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get buses
- O ,
Sand / . Van Drivers to , Bus Co./ Yard to get vans
! Sand ~ Van Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get vans
', Send Van Drivers to Bus Co./ Yard to get vans
- o CURESIDE YICKUP - Assign drivers t'o the following route groups
i Buses" [ Vans
'O
- 62. o _
. 92 5.
. 6.
- 3. 3. 7.
O ,
- 4. 4. 8.
5.
Q d ) bl '/6 h w >' .3 d I b l00ME
.[
'g i ,
L M fR TotdL c"~f,dw W- Rey. 3 h-t w t f f .t! A k
- F i .. .
. >s c a chga n pRiv t.i't u ,. ,
o ,,o., i.- n,~-
k /
r- r
- O OPIP 3.6.5 Page 60 of 60
'O {. Attachment 16 Page 2 of 2 50C/SPECIAL POPULATIONS BUS DISPATCHER PATCHOGUE STAGLNG AREA (continued)
- O SPECIAL FACILITIES - Assign bus driver to the facilities che'cked off on the following list.. T 3 No. of Buses . Reception Zone i Reg'd i Center Name JO neaten care racilities A* 1 Suffolk Dev.
l l Association for Help of Retarded Child Center i F 1 u.
I Our lady of Perpetual Help Convent G 2 Ridge Rest Home K 3
.o - Woodhaven Nursing / Adult Home K 2 La5alle Mili- I
~~
,~. Oak Hollow /Crast Ha11 tary Academy L
Millcrest Adult Rome LaSalle Mili-
% Riverhead Nursing Home /f P Q
2 2
tary Academy g: l ~~~
Maryhaven Center of Hope Q l ,l
, Suurest Health Facilities l Nursery Schools ""
F 1 )
' "" ~
Alphabet 1and Child Enrichment Center R 2 l
!O Central Brookhaven Head Start '
K 1 l Coram Child Care Center M 2 l
' L Kid-R-Us. Day Care l M 1 Middle Island Nursery School F 1
' St. Anselm's Nursery School E 1 l
~
, . Sc. John's Pre-School F 1
- O
~
Sound Beach Pre-School G 1 Step by Step Early 7.marning ,
G 1 i Trinity Lutheran Nursery School C 1 l 1 Wading River Cooperative Play School Parochia1 Schools ** .
!O Q In faa'e .se sus School S St. Isidore School. j f /'
Activated Trans fer Points '
Z Brkhyn Multiple % Cia.;
O S- ~ ' Miller Place y Shirley Mall T arookhaven Lab E Norwood Ave.
3 'Coran *'dd12 Plaza Island C Brookhaven Substation d ~ Doctors Path 1 .
1< l I.ut;on 3 3 s t at'.:n
. _. Z=pressway ?. a l
, s O
"***' C
' ! " -7
- 11 P.a. to 6 a.a.
. - - . Rev. 6 i (
,---_.~__._2. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . . . . _ _ , _ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ __ _ ___ ,_ _ _ _ ,, , , , , _ , __
D a
3 e
e ATTACHMENT D O
O O
O
'O O
- O 5A pg Attachment D
', ,@f/6 Federal Emergency Management Agency
. . -m g Mr. Charles A. Daverio Manager, E E v. cy Preparedness Division Iong Island Lighting Cmpany 175 East old Country Road Hicksville,!E 11801
- O
Subject:
Revised objectives for Shornham Exa.ccise: and F m A '
List of Demonstrations l
Dear Mr. Daverio:
-O The Regional Assistance Ccrmittee has reviewed the proposed exercise objectives and your suggested miifications footncted at
- the bottom of each page and those conta.ined in your letter to tra dated h l r 5, 1985. Our cxrrmants are as follota: ,
Pace 1 0
- Sixth objective - the demonstration of this objective is not affected by the legal authority issun and,therefore the astarisk has been deleted.
i
- l CW ncw exercise objective was added which reads:
!O * "Derenstrate the ability to coordinate the erargency response with county and State officials. (Role of State and/or county officials will be si:x. lated by IDS designated pe. m.l".
Footncte was redified and new reads:
O "The derrenstration of this objective is affected by the legal authority issue".
This change is applicable to every page of the exercise objectives.
Pace 2 O-
- First exercise objective was I:cdified by deleting "and ability".
Sixth a.xi seventh objectives were :redified by adding reference to the water porr.icn of the 10 :r.ile IPZ.
,g With respect to your crrrrent regarding the pr:r pt notification system, n.v..A, Pagion 2 evaluates the 15 minutes " rule" for alert a.d netification of the public in all full scale exercises, i
o ~
731300
) .- .
Page 3
)
- In response to your cx:rmient concerning the notification of schools during the exercise via tone alert radios and telephone calls frcm the Public and Private School Coordinators,it is FDR's position that if the impleman-tation of the plan is to be evaluated, the decision *
) nust be alid to make any decision he deems appropriate, and the follow-up actions called for in the plan must be .
perfo:nad. 'Ihe plan calls for the notification by tone alert radicsand tele nust be demonstrated'. phones therefore, these capabilities
) We would appreciate receiving a clear guidance as to what denonstratiorews should be prepared to observe during the exercise.
Page 4 3 Secend, third and fourth objectives were redified by referencing BAO personnel.
Ninth objective was nodified by adding reference to the Traffic Guides
} Pace 5 Pburth exercise objective redified,by adding reference to '
the Traffic G.: ides.
Pace 6
)
- We did not accept your rectzmandation to 6elete the first exercise objective. Althcugh we agree that in any given accident only one option will be used (early dismissal of school or evacuation), we have in past exercises used both options. Depending on the decision made during the exercise, 3 the second dancmstration can be run out of sequence (free play nessage) .
With respect to the denenstration of redical drill (objectives ninth and tenth) II2% agrees to evaluate a weekend drill provided a prior arrangerrent is made. Om two objectives
) crossed-out should be reinstated.
It is II:MA's position that Pacection Center must be evaluated in secuence with the exercise scenario.
J 3 731301
) ,
1 Fifth and sixth objectives were nodified by deleting
) "by shift change".
Pace 7 Eighth objective was nodified by deleting "an overall
- %t" and substituting with " dose ". In addition,
) reference to BAO was added.
Tenth objective was nodified by deleting " determine" <
with "reccmnand". l Page 8
)
- Sixth objective - asterisk indicating that this objective is affected by the legal authcrity issue was deleted.
Page 9
) No cer:rnants Page 10 .
Second objective was nodified by deleting "by shift change".
) Paes 11 Second objective was nodified by deleting "thrcrgh shift change or".
Sixth objective should 1:e reinstate $ but noved to page 1.
Pace 12 First and second objectives were deleted.
Third objective was modified by adding: "and interaction
) with IE!c IDC".
New objective was added to read:
- "Ds:enstrate the ability to coordi.. ate the dose projections based on plant data and field measurernants with ecunty and/cr state officials (Role of State and/or county officials will
) .
be si.ulated by 312% designated personnel) ."
)
y 73130.7
)
LIST OF ACTIVIT2IS 'IO BE DDOETRATm BY rTim AND EVALUA7ED BY FD1A
)
Per my letter of Deceber 2,1985 and discussions at the Deceber 12 caeting, I res ....r4 that the following activities / facilities be der:cnstrated during the-Feb::uary 13, 1986 exercise.
Activities to Prs-designated
) be dow.strated Free In Out of No.
Plav Secuence Secuence Warning Point x E x EDF x x 1
SC x x 1
X 1
) Remption Center x x 1 Emergency Worker Decen. x 1 x
Staying Areas x x 1 Cong. Care Centers x x 3 Bus Routes (Gen. pop.) .x 2 x x School Evacuation 8
) (Schccls re:pesting assistance mbility L@ed x 2
at hcru x
6 mbility Irpaired at address-
) special facilities x x Transfer Points in 2 sagoence with bus rou*Js x x Boat Ale.t w (Coast Guard) x
) Reute Alerting x 1 (Siren Failure x
'ICPs x 3 TWie to x x 3x3 Evacuation Medical Drill x x 2 x
) Radiological x Itnitoring x x 2 Accident Assessnunt x x 2
) .
add ess,and telephone numbers)I request that you provide ne with t should by Deceber 20, 1985. In addition, yha, indicate (time window) . an approximate ti=e when MA can evaluate each activity
) Any free play activities will be selected by FD'A.
731303 J
~
) .
e f . .
' .5 OTHER ISSUES REIATED M SIOREHAM EXERCISE
) il 3 At thereached:
were Decenbar 12, 1985 rneeting with you, the following agreements o
- i LIICO will confirm the February 13, 1986 exercise 4
date in writing.
) (
LIIID will advise IDR why sirens cannot be sounded in sequence with the exercise scenario.
t
- 8 LIICD will provide IDR with a flocr plan and traffic flow for each staging area.
y *
. LIIDO will provide FDR with information on eh414ty inpaired at hone and special facilities that depend on buses, *1=us, etc. (trf tyce of vehicle required) .
LIIID will advise IDE about a drill which could be D inferrally observed and evaluated in .Tanuary 1986.
In addition to the ab:Me, I request that LII4D arrange for desks and telephones for Federal Observers at the following facilities:
EC Staging Areas g
- News Center EDF WC LII4D also shculd arrange for desks and telephones for simlators (State and local representatives) at:
B . g IDF Staging Areas (actual need to be deternuned later)
If g ou have any questions concerning this letter, please let me know at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely, g af f. 8 pDlesd9 Roger S. Towieski, P.E.
Chairman Regional Assistance Cxmittee s
e 731304
)- '
)
).-
)
PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES for the
)
1986 SHOREMAN EXERCISE
) Revised December 13, 1985 l
)- m -
y y
)
)
~ '
731305
D PEgo 1 of 12 December 13, 1985 i
U PROPOSED EIERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SHOREHAM EXERCISE Emergency Operations Center (ECC) 3 Demonstrate the ability to receive initial and follow-up emergency notifications.
Demonstrate the Local a timely Emergency Rer>ponse OrganizationEOC manner. (LERO)the in O
Demonstrate through ros ters, the ability to maintain staffing in the LERO EOC on a 24-hour basis.
Demonstrate that the LERO EOC has adequate space, equipment,
) operations. and supplies to support emergency Demonstrate that the LERO can establish appropriate communication
( communication links, with theboth primary and backup systems simulated). State and county v:.a RECS to be 3
Demonstrate control that the LERO EOC has adequate access and that security can be maintained.
Demonstrate that messages are transmitted in an
) accurate logged, that and timely statusmanner, messages are properly and updated, that boards are accurately maintained that incoming personnel are briefed. appropriate briefings are held, and Demonstrate that
,3 and in control of the appropriate official is in charge an overall coordinated response including decisions on protective action recommendations.
m Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the emergency
- ' response with county and State officials. (Role of
- State and/or county FE.% designated personnel.)
officials will be simulated by S
- Note:
The dem::nstration the legal of this objective is affected by authority issue.
3 731306
3, Page 2 of 12
. December 13, 1985 O PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SHOREEAM EXERCISE i
Emergency Operations Center - Continued D * '
Demonstrate the ability of the designated official to l determine the need to obtain State assistance.
Demonstrate the abilit g appropriate locations,y to personnel.
communicateand organizations, with all field Demonstrato r adia t io n dosagethe ability to receive projection and interpret information and to determine PAGs and appropriate pro tec t ive measures ,, based on g Office (BAO). inf ormation received from the Brookhaven A ea Demons trate the ability to provide advance coordination of public alerting and instructional messages with the State and county (State and simulated ) . county participation O
- Demonstrate notification siren the acility'to activate the prompt' sys tem in coordination with State and councy (State and county participation simulated).
Demonstrate the capability for providing both an alert O signal and an informational or instructional message to ,
the population on an area-wide basis throughout the 10 mile EPZ,_includine the water nortion, within 15 minutes (45 minutes for water oortion) . '
Demonstrate the orderly evacuation of all or part of the 10-mile EPZorgani zational 1j ab including the water portion.
" Note:
The deconstration of this objective is affected by the legal aut.t rity issue.
o o
7313C7 o
o
3 Pago 3 of 12
.. December 13, 1985 Q PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SBOREBAM EXERCISE
_ _ . = -
Emergency Operations Center - Continued 3
- Demonstrate the impediments to evacuation, such as inclementorganizational a traffic obstructions. weather or Demonstrate the g effect organizational ability necessary to EPZ. an early dismissal of schools within the 10-mile Demonstrate the control access to an evacuated area. organizational ability necessary Demonstrate the organi za tional ability necessary to 3 effect an orderly evacuation 10-mile EPZ. If this protective of schools action within the is not recommended by the decision-makers, e.g. schools were dismis sed early, a free play controllers message may be inserted to demonstrate this activity.
3
- i Demonstrate EBS in a timelythe ability to prepare and implement manner (i.e., within 15 minutes after command and control decision for implemen-tation of protective action recomme'ndations).
O
' Note:
3 The denonstration of this objective is affected by the legal authority issue.
e e
731308 o
._.-___-._n.,._ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . - _ _ _ _ . . . _._ -_
)
- Pcge 5 of 12 December 13, 1985 3 PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SHOREEAM EXERCISE Field Activities - Continued O
Demonstrate that emergency workers understand who can authorize excess exposure under the Protective Action Guidelines.
Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to
) implement an orderly evacuation of all or part of the 10-mila EP Z.
Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to deal with impediments to evacuacion, such as in clement weather or traffic obstructions.
3
- Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to control access to an evacuated area (Traffic Guides).
Demonstrate the adequacy of evacuation bus transfer points including access and parking / transfer areas.
3 Demonstrate a sample of L'esources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of the institutionalized mobility-impaired individuals within the 10-mile EPZ.
Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to effect 3 an orderly evacuation of the n o n-i n s titutionalized mobility-impaired individuals within the 10-mile EPZ.
3 " Note:
Tne de::mnstration of this objective is affected by the legal autharity issue.
y O
3 731303
j- ,
Page 6 of 12 December 13, 1985
) PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR TEE 1986 SEORERAM EXERCISE Field Activities - Continued
)
Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to effect an early dismissal of schools within the 10-mile EPZ.
Demonstrate a sample of resources necessary to effect ~
an orderly evacuation of
) EP Z. schools within the 10-mile Demonstrate the ability to mobilize staff and activate Reception Center in a timely manner.
Demonstrate the ability to mobilize staff and activate
) Congregate Care Center in a timely manner.
Demonstrate through rosters the ability to maintain
. staffing at the Reception Center on a 24-hour basis.
Demonstrate through rosters the ability f.o maintain
) staffing at the Congregate Care Center on a 24-hour basis. g Demonstrate registration, the adequacy of procedures for radiological monitoring, and
) decontamination of evacuees and vehicles including adequats provisions for handling contaminated wasta. l Demons trate the adequacy of facilities for mass care of evacuees.
) Demonstrate adequacy for ambulance f acilities and p rocedur es for handling injured and contaminated individuals.
off-site injury). (Medical drill involves an on-site /
D emon s t rate adequacy of hospital facilities and
) procedures for handling injured and contaminated individuals.
off-site injury).(Medical drill involves an o n -site /
) " Note:
The de::tmstration of this objective is affected by the legal autterity issue.
i
) -
731310
) .
Pcgo 7 of 12 4
December 13, 1985
) PROPOSED EXERCISE CBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SBOREEAM EXERCISE Brookhaven Area Office (BAO)
) Demonstrate the ability to receive initial and follow up emergency notifications. ,
Demonstrate the ability to mobilize staff and activate the Bho in a timely manner.
~
) Demonstrate through ros ters, the ability to maintain staffing in the BAO on a 24-hour basis.
Demons trste that the BAO has adequate space, equipment, and supplies to support emergency operations.
) Demonstrate that the BAO can es tablish appropriate communication systems.
links, using both primary and backup Demonstrate that the B AO has adequate access control and that security can be maintained.
)
D e mo n s t ra te that messages are transmitted in an accurate and timely manner, messages are properly logged, that status boards are accurately maintained and updated, that appropriate briefings are held, and that incoming personnel are briefed.
Demonstrate that the appropriate official is in charge l and in control of dose assessment function _assioned to the BAO.
D emo n s t rate the ability ~ to communicate with all
) appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.
t Demonstrate the ability to project radiation dosage to the public via plume exposure, based on plant data and
) field measurements, and to recon =:end appropriate pro-tactive measures, based on PAGs and effectively communicate them to the LERO EOC.
)
731311
)
4
) ,- ,
Pcgo 8 o'f 12 December 13, 1985
)
PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SBOREEAM EXERCISE Staging Areas
)
Demonstrate the ability to etceive emergency notifications.
Demonstrate the ability to mobilize staff and activate the staging areas in a timely manner.
)
Demonstrate through rosters the ability to maintain staffing at the staging areas on, a 24-hour basis. ;
Demons trate parking area,thatequi the staging areas have adequate space, emergency operations . pme n t , and supplies to support Demonstrate appropriate that the staging areas can establish communication links with the LERO EOC and field personnel using both primary and backup systems.
I
) Demonstrate that the staging areas have adequate secess control and that security can be maintained. I D e mo n s t ra te that messages are transmitted in an accurate anc timely man,ner, messages are properly logged, and that status updated, that boards are accurately maintained
) that incoming personnel appropriate briefings are held, and are briefed.
Demonstrate that the appropriate official is in charge and in control of an overall response assigned to the staging area.
)
- Demonstrate the ability to dispatch to and direct emergency workers in the field.
- Notet
) he denenstration of this objective is affected by the legal authority issue.
)
731312
) -
Page 9 of 12 December 13, 1985
}
PROPOSED EXERCIS4 kJBJECTIVES FOR TEE 1986 SBORESAM EXERCISE Staging Areas - Continued
)
D emo n s t rate the ability to appropriate locations, organizations, personnel. communicate andwith all field J
J J
3 2
3 -
73131^,
_ , , . . - . . - . - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ * * ' . .
- 1 Pcgs 10 of 12
.- December 13, 1985
$ PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SHOREHAM EXERCISE i
Emergency Workers Decontamination Facility y .
Demonstrate Emergency Worker Decontamination Facility.the ability to '
Demonstrate through rosters, the ability to maintain staffing of Emergenc on a 24-hour basis. y Worker Decontamination Facility D
Demonstrate adequate equipment and procedures for decontamination vehicles including of emergency adequate workers, equipment and contaminated waste. provisions for handling ('
D 3
3 3
e .
- Note:
The de:nmstration the legal of this objective is affec*d by aut.trity issue.
e e 731311
3 , ., ,
Page 11 of 12 December 13, 1985, D
PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SBOREEAM EXERCISE Emergency News Center (ENC)
Q Demonstrate the ability to mobilize staff and activate '
LERO functions at the ENC in a timely manner.
3 Demonstrate through rosters the ability to maintain staffing of LERO functions at the ENC on a 24-hour basis.
Demonstrate the ability to brief the media in a clear accurate, and timely manner.
3 Demonstrate the ability to share information with other agencias at the ENC prior to its release.
Demonstrate the ability to establish and operate rumor control in a coordinated manner.
3 k\ Dem nser ti ely e the bility o pre re an imple nt in a n ner (i.e. , ' thin minu es aft co nd nd ntro dec ion fo imple entati n of p oter'.'ve a tion reco ndati ns).
j Demons t. ate that the ENC has adequate space, equipment,
, and supplies to support emergency operations.
Demonstrate that the ENC has adequate access control and that security can be maintained.
3 -
y 1
- Note:
The derenstration of this objective is affected by the legal authority issue.
O o -
731315
D .- .
Page 12 of 12 December 13, 1985 ;
\
J PROPOSED EXERCISE OBJECTIVES FOR THE 1986 SBORZEAM EXERCISE J
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)
D onst ate e abil ty to me ilize s ff a
, fun tions at the ;OF in a imely ner.
acti ate e natr te b shif cha g a i ity t mai tain taffi e th ugh as es, he EO a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> sis.
of LERO fune ion in e Demonstrate that the Emergency Operations Facility has adequate space, ~
equipment, and - supplies to support emergency operations and interaction with LERO EOC.
3 Demonstrate have adequate that the Emergency Operations Facilities maintained. access control and that security can be O Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the dose projections based on plant data and field measurements with county and/or State officials (Role of State and/or county officials will be simulated by FEMA designated personnel) .
t O
s O
G .
l
- Note g The de cnstration of this objective is affected by the legal authority issue.
73131C o
3 0
3 g
O ATTACHMENT E O
O O
O O
O
3
'11M. SCRIF1 -- 8 OF PROC 9UE ~GS 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _x In the Matter of: :
- Docket No. 50-322-OL-5
) LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY : (EP Exercise)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, : (ASLBP No. 86-533-01-OL)
Unit 1) : ,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 3
g DEPOSITION OF JAMES'CONRAD BARANSKI, JAMES DOMINIC PAPILE and LAWRENCE BRUNO CZECH D
D Albany, New York D Tuesday, February 3, 1987 ace-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.
5:ene:viv Rwrtm 444 Nor:h Cactrol street D ; 'Aa-hygon{D;C.)o:001
- u ::,,3,u Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 e
~
9 -
acoo 01 01, r,9 ,
l D ccrysimons 1 by tone alert -- mainly by tone alert at all our 2 installations.
3 No. 2 is we do exercise some schools by sending
) 4 school buses to the school with a FEMA observer selected by 5 FEMA again and then showing where those buses would go after
) 6 they received their instructions.
7 0 With the exception of those schools to which 8 buses are sent, the participation you are referring to is J
9 notification either by phone or by tone alert?
10 A True.
3 11 O With respect to nursing homes, can you tell you 12 what you mean by participation?
13 A The same way. Nursing homes are called by either J
14 the hospital coordinator or the MSC coordinator at the EOC 15 and given the information about the incident or the exercise J 16 incident at that time.
l 17 l 0 And once again it is telephone notification ---
18 j A Telephone notification or tone alert also in 19 nursing homes.
20 0 And that's the extent of participation?
9 21 ' A Tnat's rignt.
22 ' :
O Haw about adult homes?
l
- ' ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.
I m.s,.- ~ _ . c... ,-
B 0000 01 01. 70 c3rysimons 1 A Adult homes would probably be the same way, 2 depending again upon each county. Each county has either 3 the Commissioner for the Aged or someone from his office, if D 4 they have such an office, in the county EOC and they would 5 notify the county adult homes. Some of the adult homes have 6 tone alerts also. I can't tell you for each county.
g 7 0 But, again, the participation is notification 8 either by telephone or tone alert?
D A Right.
9 10 0 Mr. Baranski, do you have anything to add to that 11 answer?
D ,
12 A (Witness Baranski) No, sir, I do not.
13 O Mr. Czech?
D No, I do not.
14 A (Witness Czech) 15 0 General Papile, are school districts in New York 3 16 l State separate political entities from the State government?
l 17 ! A (Witness Papile) As described to me, yes, they 18 l are.
19 l' O Is planning for them not necessarily the l'
20 responsibility of local governments?
p 21 A Festate that cuestion, please.
22 i O Is emergency planning for school districts not l
l
- ! ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.
202-347-3700 Nationside Coserage 500 336 4646
-y_ . ..-
O O
O
~
O O
ATTACHMENT F 0
0 0
0-O O
O Attachment F Special population evacuees will be routed through the LILCO Brentwood facility on their way to the designated O relocation centers. These evacuees will arrive by ambulance, ambulette and bus. They will be monitored while in their vehicle by the monitors assigned to the EWDF. Monitoring of each evacuee should take less than 90 seconds. Since there are less than 2,000 special population evacuees, the 30 EWDF monitors will be able to monitor these evacuees in less than
- (3 two hours or else as fast as they arrive. It is expected that this monitoring vill be completed prior to the arrival of the returning LERO emergency field personnel.
Decontamination of special population evacuees will be handled (3 at the Brentwood EWDF for ambulatory evacuees. Contamination on non-ambulatory evacuees will be removed to the extent possible without disturbing the patient. If detailed decontamination of non-ambulatory evacuees is necessary, they will be sent to the hospitals having accredited radiology or nuclear medicine departments.
- O 10
- O l
i g i
i I
'O O
3.9-5B Draft 2/20/87 O
l
,-v-- y -
-r-- -,w v - --- ---- -----