ML20212K124

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:46, 20 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected
ML20212K124
Person / Time
Site: Millstone, Three Mile Island, Shoreham  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1999
From: Adensam E
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Blossom D, Blossomweiss, Bond J, Bond S, Booth S, Chaskey M, Chaskey S, Cohen B, Cole J, De Scovine D, Dobbs L, Dobbs M, Fearon E, Huglund R, Mcdade E, Merrell J, Merrell S, Miller W, Ruch S, Sandell C, Schimmer D, Scott A, Scott D, Solow R, Von Hassell M, Von Wearen C, Weiss S
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20212K002 List:
References
NUDOCS 9910060143
Download: ML20212K124 (27)


Text

_ ------

'. u

{

' "l kWEk a+ h UNITED STATES (

[

t j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4001

\ % ,*/ October 1, 1999 Scott Weiss Box 442 Sag Harbor, NY 11963-0009

Dear Mr. Weiss:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency respmse.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55.FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, f& * = -

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 9910060143 991001 PDR ADOCK 05000245 H PDR

4 l*

  • s g

(w T UNITED STATES i

i j

t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20665 4001 4

October 1, 1999 Cay M. Von Wearen P.O. Box 1094 Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Von Wearen:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55 FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLi-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation K[

'd

r

  • * $ 7E _

h k. UNITED STATES s# [ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMINUON

  1. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20566-0001 4

9 , , , , 4 ,o October 1, 1999 Malve von Hassell 11 Cedarberry Lane Southampton, NY 11968

Dear Ms. von Hassell:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastem Long Island. As noted in my i previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile i emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55fR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of l issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987), i CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail  ;

"PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

]

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk i Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of l communication to ensure that Eastem Long Island is considered when decisions are made  ;

regarding the Mi5 stone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of ~

regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, f e=-

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate 1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

c .__ m

  • W

. p 4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20066 4001

\g# October 1, 1999 Rita Solow -

P.O. Box 996 Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Solow:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concem about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concems about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their suppoiting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is aasisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstorie plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, i

a A =~

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _a

'. +? "%4 l .-

7 k. UNITED STATES' '

j j- ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l- t WASHINGTON, D.c. 2006dL4001 October 1, 1999 I- Dale H. Scott P.O. Box 2118 Sag Harbor, NY 11963-0077

Dear Mr. Scott:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and to Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack.of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

l

-The Commission has given the NRC ctaff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55fR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987).

CLl-87-12); These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongeing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concems to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

IT ,

  • . pfL AE
g. k UNITED STATES

' g. [ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-4001 October 1, 1999 Angela Scott '

P.O. Box 1590 Sag Harber, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Scott:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55_FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the

. plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

rp

,, '4 M 'h

[f s-Jt j

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-0001

% October 1, 1999 Diane D. Schimmer 141 Wildwood Road Sag Harbor, NY 11963'

Dear Ms. Schimmer:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concems about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55.FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

' CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the

. plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure

.that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, l En k &

Elinor G. Adensam, Director

\

Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I

L

n-(:

  • ge miug l j g Jt UNITED STATES l

3

j. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20665 4 001

%, . . . . p

-October 1, 1999 l- Catherine Creedon Sandell 22 Mt. Misery Drive l Sag Harbor, NY 11963 l

Dear Ms. Sandell:

l Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of  !

about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response. I The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990. Fcderal Reaister notice (55fR 5603)  !

denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regardng emergency planning in support of I issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Pc wer Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," cr 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of

- communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of  !

regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns l

to the attention of the NRC.

1 Sincerely,  ;

ev Elinor G. Adensam, Director l Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  !

t i

C,

.2 _

__ -_ - _. m p* **%

o 4: UNITED STNIES

[

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20556 0001 October 1, 1999 Shirley A. Ruch 28 South Valley Road Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Ruch:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55fR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to corf ue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, L Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

  • #* p nra .

i ki UNITED STATES h'

e S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

3- j WASHINGTON, D.c. 3000M001

!  % October 1, 1999 II$$p[h C. Hoglund -

,4 L - P.O. Box 642

l. . Sag Harbor, NY 11963 '

L

[  :

Dear Mr. Hoglund:

i 1 Thank you for your record letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concem about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have

, been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the )

/ continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my

, previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile .

emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of -

about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response. I The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_ER 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of i issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuciear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12).- These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The.Egie.ral Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating'a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing

' dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the

~~p lans they believe are needed Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is con, Wilco to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concems to the attention of the NRC.  ;

i Sincerely, l

- ~ <k =:= w I .Elinor G. Adensam Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i- '

l< l S .

l )

F l

+

l

,J,en l l y* 4 UNITED STATES '

y t

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20656-0001 4

9. g October 1, 1999 l l

Susan Merrell 31 Carlisle Lane Sag Harbor, NY 11963 1

l

Dear Ms. Merrell:

l Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have i been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the f continued lack of an emargency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55_ER 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made ,

regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing l dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed. .

1 Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns  :

to the attention of the NRC. 1 Sincerely,

[ M I.

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

, w~ . . _ _ - _ _ - . ~ . . . _ . _ _ . ._ _

"g i

g* $ UNITED STATES s

2 j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20656 4001 1 $.,

% October 1, 1999 James Merrell 31 Carlisle Lane Sag Harbor, NY 11963 i

Dear Mr. Merrell:

{

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Mic.one nuclear power plants which have I been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my  ;

previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Corr, mission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_ER 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure l that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director l Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

jpg p M1 UNITED STATES l g j t

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINCTON, D.C. 20556-0001 l

i e

l 9,,,,,# October 1, 1999 Elinor McDade Box 1144 Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. McDade:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the l continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my l previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their i supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC stMf directions in response to requests to expand the  ;

10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55fR 5603)  !

denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of  !

issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987), l CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of j regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely,

[ +n-1 Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management j Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation f

I

{.,

f Mou y- t UNITED STATES

' s" j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2056H001

+ October 1, 1999

. William G. Miller 28 S. Valley Road Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Mr. Miller:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referrod to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55 FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing i dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the l plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, 1

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l I

%a_

j' ..;

_u-,w-~~._._-<~-- ~ - ,. - . - . -

\

f'. p2 nstg\

I p* UNITED STATES f j j 2

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20066-0001 p

4 # October 1, 1999 l Doris Blossom P.O. Box 2396 l

Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Blossom:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the j 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55_FR 5603) l denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk l Cc9nties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the ]

plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC. j Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director ,

Project Directorate I l Division of Licensing Project Managernent l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

L _. _ . - .

l ..

y* 4 UNITED STATES

  • a NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION If WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4001

% . . . . . p! October 1, 1999 Meikle Blossom-Weiss 295 Madison Street Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Blossom-Weiss:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_FB 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastem Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officiais, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

~.

U p ctr p 41 UNITED STATES y

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2066tWMNH 9

[

g,,* October 1. 1999 Joseph B. Bond 19 Widgeon Lane Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Mr. Bond:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and -

Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Threo Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55.ER 5603)

. denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and ti.e CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

f'o . . .

l. h

,v g 4 UNITED STATES

< S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f WASHINGTON, D.c. 2066H001

% . . . . . ,o October 1, 1999 Suzanne Bond 10 Widgeon Lane  !

Sag Harbor, NY 11963 I

Dear Ms. Bond:

I Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this poli y was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commiasion has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_FJ 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, ,

I l Elinor G. Adensam, Director

( Project Directorate l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l l

l a

1 1

  • \

]

g

[  %

4 '

. ' UNITED STATES j

t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2066H001

  1. October 1, 1999 Sally S. Booth 127 Madison Street Sag Harbor, NY 19963

Dear Ms. Booth:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concems about Millstone and the J continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my  !

previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their '

supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990,~ Federal Reaister notice (55 FR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a -minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstor v to casure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, f& .

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

hv. ~

f. -

.* '$? pun %'

p- 4.

E . UNITED STATES L j

-[ .

NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 4 001 J

e g October _1,'1999 '

Megan_Chaskey:

- P.O. Box 27 Sag Harbor, NY.11963

Dear Ms.'Chaskey:

Thank you for your recent letters to' Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and . l Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concems about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

- The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55f3 5603) -

denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk

' Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing

~

L dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed. l Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure lthat public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns

to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, t

Elinor G. Adensam, Director l Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

rg .

_ *"' % g

.p 4 UNITED STATES

.y j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20655-0001

% # October 1, 1999 Scott Chaskey P.O. Box 27 -

Sag Harbor, NY 11963 J

Dear Mr. Chaskey:

' Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and l

Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have i been referred to me for response, in your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the l continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of

. about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response. l The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the l 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55fR 5603) denying a petitior for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of l issuonce of the operati?g license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLi-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail  !

"PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed l material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages. I Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk l Cokties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of l communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the ;

plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, f .

Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate I L Division of Licensing Project Management l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

p-e._

.. , e a

_ , r,-~._ . ~ . _ - .. . - ~ . , ,

.s

%q j p k "

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION If~

\,,,,,/

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-0001 October 1, 1999 Bobbie Cohen 20 Collinswood Drive Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Ms. Cohen:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concem about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55.ER 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed 1 material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages. I Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastem Long Island is considered when decisions are made j regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure l that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of

, . regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely,

^ ^ =

l Elinor G. Adensam, Director i Project Directorate i l

Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

. Men l

g i UNITED STATES t

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2056H001

)

% # October 1,1999

' Jeffrey E. Cole' 127 Madison Street Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Mr. Cole:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concem about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the i accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the j 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55_ER 5603) i denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk l Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of j communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made i regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing l dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure ,

that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of l regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns j to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely,

'.sw Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate l l Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation .

l l

g,_____._ . . _ _ . _ . . _ .

1 ,

ger* G4g p 4 UNITED STATES j

s# NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  1. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20556-0001 October 1, 1999 Dan De Scovine clo De Simone Company i P.O. Box 1590 Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Mr. De Scovine:

)

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and the Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concem about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have i been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the  !

continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of

. about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reoister notice (55_ER 5603) i denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of l issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987), i CLI-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed material. The Federal Reoister notice is 12 pages and the CLl-87-12 is 17 pages.

Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinaied emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made t regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure j that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of j regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciato your bringing your concems  !

to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director  !

Project Directorate I ,

Division of Licensing Project Management i Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l

I i

L

y exumruurauu 1

. j . g. g NUCLEAR REZUi.ATORY COMMISSION

, t- CASHINITCN, D.C. 20666-0001 October 1, 1999

%...../ I 4

Michel and Liz Dobbs 17 Latham Street i Sag Harbor, NY 11963

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dobbs:

Thank you for your recent letters to Chairman Jackson and Commissioners and Dr. William D. Travers expressing concern about the Millstone nuclear power plants which have been referred to me for response. In your letters you raised concerns about Millstone and the continued lack of an emergency management plan for Eastern Long Island. As noted in my previous letters proposals have been made to both increase and decrease the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) distance since this policy was established following the j accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. After consideration of these proposals and their supporting document and rationale, the Commission has consistently concluded that an EPZ of about 10 miles in radius provides an acceptable planning basis for emergency response.

1 The Commission has given the NRC staff directions in response to requests to expand the 10-mile EPZ (as discussed in the February 16,1990, Federal Reaister notice (55fR 5603) denying a petition for rulemaking) and in a decision regarding emergency planning in support of l issuance of the operating license for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (26 NRC 383 (1987),

CLl-87-12). These references are available through the NRC Public Document Room, e-mail "PDR@nrc. gov," or 1-800-397-4209. There is a minimal charge of $0.08 per page of printed rnaterial. The Federal Reaister notice is 12 pages and the CLI-87-12 is 17 pages.

I Northeast Utilities is assisting each of the five east end towns of Long Island and Suffolk Counties with creating a coordinated emergency plan and establishing an open line of communication to ensure that Eastern Long Island is considered when decisions are made regarding the Millstone plants. I encourage the communities involved to continue the ongoing j dialogue with Northeast Utilities, as well as appropriate state and county officials, to develop the <

plans they believe are needed.

Again, I assure you that the NRC continues to monitor the performance of Millstone to ensure

]

that public health and safety are adequately protected. The NRC is committed to the level of  ;

regulatory oversight needed to carry out this mandate. I appreciate your bringing your concerns l to the attention of the NRC. 1 Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Director Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation g

o ' "

  • me es,. ,y em. ne**pgy,y, swesw - * *m'- ~ . as s owne.oom- - menwooe n- -= r e

L