ML20206G979

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:35, 29 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That,Based on Encl Insp Rept 50-482/85-03 & Evidence That Issue of Harassment Not Substantiated,Technical Concerns of Allegation 4-84-A-076 Considered Closed.W/O Rept
ML20206G979
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek, 05000000
Issue date: 09/04/1985
From: Martin L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Nash T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20206G744 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-594 NUDOCS 8606250489
Download: ML20206G979 (1)


See also: IR 05000482/1985003

Text

- _ .

.

~ ~~

p # *%,

5 UNITED STATES

yT i

'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ c1 hg'n/ --. ,E REGION IV

S s

'I 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011

%, ,

SEP 0 41985

MEMORANDUM FOR: T. A. Nash, Allegation Coordinator

FROM: L. E. Martin, Chief, Project Section B, Reactor Project

Branch

SUBJECT: ALLEGATION 4-84-A-076

_

The technical concerns of this individual and the followup to these concerns

are contained in report 50-482/85-03.

The issue of termination, as a result of talking with tha NRC, was followed up

by KG&E Quality First and the NRC. I talked with the individual and with the

party responsible for preparing the reduction in force list.

The individual was a contractor employee involved in the diesel generator

startup testing program. The individual was terminated as a result of a

reduction in force, but when KG&E became aware of the possible harassment

issue, the individual was immediately rehired without any loss in pay. The

individual retained his position until the completion of the D.G. testing,

approximately 2 weeks later.

As a result of this concern, KG&E management immediately began preparing R0F

lists notifying individuals of the sequence that personnel could anticipate

further reduction in work force,.

The individual did not loose any pay and never actually left the site. The

party that recommended the individual for termination stated that he was using

,

a schedule that indicated that the D.G. testing was complete, and therefore,

thought the individual's job was complete.

The issue of harassment was not substantiated, but the appearance was there.

KG&E actions were considered prompt and appropriate for correcting this

matter.

On the basis of inspection report 50/482/85-03 and the above information, this

allegation is considered closed.

># a # % ,.

,W

y ,E. L. Mart'n, Chief

Project S ction B

!

Attachment:

NRC Inspection Report

j 50-482/85-03

e606250489 e60618

PDR FOIA

STEPHEN 85-594 PDR 8-I7

--. . .

Ea lo I ._ ..