ML20151A702

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:07, 25 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151A702
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1987
From: Steinberger A
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 52FR6980-00068, 52FR6980-68, OL-3, NUDOCS 8807200094
Download: ML20151A702 (1)


Text

'

g -

D L F C.

(FEB 2 319W) g4gg 303 Curtis AveMeMAR -2 P5 :33 Carle Place, NY 11514 February 26, })B7 ggc. , , .

Mr. Lando W. Zech, Jr. Chairman '

Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Zech:

Regarding your hearings on a new rule that would not require state and local cooperation prior to the licens-ing of nuclear power plants, I heartily concur.

In the case of Shoreham, on Long Island, New York State and Suffolk County approved construction of the plant, well knowing the problems they now cite. After construction at an expense of billions of dollars which will ultimately be paid by the ratepayers and/or taxpayers and is increas-ing each month that it is idle, a new set of politicitns fight it for their own political publicity and gain.

Evacuation possibilities were considered prior to the time of approval but are now used as the reason to. prevent Shoreham's opening. Additional electric power is in g:e, iter need daily on Long Island and the Shoreham plant should oc opened as soon as practical. Obviously every safety measure has been reviewed and incorporated in it.

Upon opening of this or any other nuclear plant, refusal of public officials to cooperate and assist in the protection of the citizens of the area should be considered dereliction of duty and they should be removed from office.

Thank you for your consideration of this statement, veproiv fory _

i b?/

Alf edN $Qinberd'e .I .

8807200094 870226 PDR PR 50 52FR6980 PDR [

w