ML20140J374

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:10, 27 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Proposed Change 2 to TS for Personnel Qualifications & Radioactive Effluents
ML20140J374
Person / Time
Site: 05000231
Issue date: 04/12/1971
From: Woodruff R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20140G249 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-97-34 NUDOCS 9705140061
Download: ML20140J374 (2)


Text

_- _- - . .- ~~ .. - - . , - -

4 g UNITED STATES

'l ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION I C-WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 1 ga ,

Mr , APR 12197; 1

File (SEFOR, Docket No. 50-231)

THRU:

R.J.Segmel Chief, ORB #1, DRL PROPOSED Cl

x. as 0, 2 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL l

QUALIFICATIONS AND RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS In an application (1) dated June 12, 1970, as amended (2) July 30,1970, GE proposed: (a) changes to the qualifications required for key per- l sonnel, (b) clarification of the limits for release of radioactive i effluents from the plant stack, and (c) incr pump-around-loop. GEsubsequentlyrequestedgedsodiumflowinthe that action be deferred i on Item (c), if necessary, to expedite Item (a). This evaluation applies j to (a) snd (b) . )

1 The proposed changes to Technical Specification 6.1.A.3 for qualifica- )

tions of key personnel generally reduces the level of competence required i for the SEFOR staff. Because of certa enforcement problems at SEFOR, the Division of Compliance recommended against changing the specifi 1 tions to the extent requested. The Operational Safety Branch comparedg-}

l l

l all of the existing qualifications specifications and the proposed changes thereto to recommended specifications in ANS-3, Draft 9, and found that they are deficient in several areas. These deficiencies will be corrected  ;

by modifying the qualifications specifications te meet the intent'of ANS-3,  ;

Draf t 9, and will include a requirement that the Operations Mar.ager be l licensed as a Senior Reactor Operator. This requirement should not be l l enforced until the first opportunity after October 1, 1971, to examine the Operations Manager.

Technical Specification 3.7.C for the release of radioactive effluents )

is difficult to interpret because the limiting part of the specification  ;

is in the reference section. GE's proposal eliminates this problem.

l l There are no other changes to the specification.

i 3

i t

4 4

9705140061 970505 - ~ ~ - -

PDR FOIA

' PDR VARADY9_7

.._ ., 34 N ,

t-

e. _e J

File -

APR 1 2 :gyj i

L ,

l 3 The requested changes to Technical Specification 6.1.A.3, as modified,  ;

. and to Technical Specification 3.7.C present no significant hazards considerations not described or implicit in the Safety Analysis Report l

l-and no undue risk to the public and should, therefore, be granted.

l. '

t T Ro W. Woodruff'  ;

Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Reactor Licensing j

References:

1. K. Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, June 12, 1970
2. K.' Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, July 30, 1970 l 3. K. Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, March 5, 1971
4. R. C. Lewis, letter to W. C. Seidle, July 8, 1970
5. J. R. Sears, letter to R. J. Schemel, March 10, 1971
6. J. Arterburn, telecon with R. W. Woodruff, March 31, 1971 l cc: D. J. Skovholt l

.R. H. Vollmer j R. J. Schemel J R. W. Woodruff l S. A. Teets M. Jinks (2)

J. Keppler l

l h

t

=

__m..,.-...

~ -- , -