ML20140J374
ML20140J374 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 05000231 |
Issue date: | 04/12/1971 |
From: | Woodruff R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
Shared Package | |
ML20140G249 | List:
|
References | |
FOIA-97-34 NUDOCS 9705140061 | |
Download: ML20140J374 (2) | |
Text
_- _- - . .- ~~ .. - - . , - -
4 g UNITED STATES
'l ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION I C-WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 1 ga ,
Mr , APR 12197; 1
File (SEFOR, Docket No. 50-231)
THRU:
R.J.Segmel Chief, ORB #1, DRL PROPOSED Cl
- x. as 0, 2 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL l
QUALIFICATIONS AND RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS In an application (1) dated June 12, 1970, as amended (2) July 30,1970, GE proposed: (a) changes to the qualifications required for key per- l sonnel, (b) clarification of the limits for release of radioactive i effluents from the plant stack, and (c) incr pump-around-loop. GEsubsequentlyrequestedgedsodiumflowinthe that action be deferred i on Item (c), if necessary, to expedite Item (a). This evaluation applies j to (a) snd (b) . )
1 The proposed changes to Technical Specification 6.1.A.3 for qualifica- )
tions of key personnel generally reduces the level of competence required i for the SEFOR staff. Because of certa enforcement problems at SEFOR, the Division of Compliance recommended against changing the specifi 1 tions to the extent requested. The Operational Safety Branch comparedg-}
l l
l all of the existing qualifications specifications and the proposed changes thereto to recommended specifications in ANS-3, Draft 9, and found that they are deficient in several areas. These deficiencies will be corrected ;
by modifying the qualifications specifications te meet the intent'of ANS-3, ;
Draf t 9, and will include a requirement that the Operations Mar.ager be l licensed as a Senior Reactor Operator. This requirement should not be l l enforced until the first opportunity after October 1, 1971, to examine the Operations Manager.
Technical Specification 3.7.C for the release of radioactive effluents )
is difficult to interpret because the limiting part of the specification ;
is in the reference section. GE's proposal eliminates this problem.
l l There are no other changes to the specification.
i 3
i t
4 4
9705140061 970505 - ~ ~ - -
' PDR VARADY9_7
.._ ., 34 N ,
t-
- e. _e J
File -
APR 1 2 :gyj i
L ,
l 3 The requested changes to Technical Specification 6.1.A.3, as modified, ;
. and to Technical Specification 3.7.C present no significant hazards considerations not described or implicit in the Safety Analysis Report l
l-and no undue risk to the public and should, therefore, be granted.
- l. '
t T Ro W. Woodruff' ;
Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Reactor Licensing j
References:
- 1. K. Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, June 12, 1970
- 2. K.' Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, July 30, 1970 l 3. K. Cohen, letter to P. A. Morris, March 5, 1971
- 4. R. C. Lewis, letter to W. C. Seidle, July 8, 1970
- 5. J. R. Sears, letter to R. J. Schemel, March 10, 1971
- 6. J. Arterburn, telecon with R. W. Woodruff, March 31, 1971 l cc: D. J. Skovholt l
.R. H. Vollmer j R. J. Schemel J R. W. Woodruff l S. A. Teets M. Jinks (2)
J. Keppler l
l h
t
=
__m..,.-...
~ -- , -