ML20108A178

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:57, 18 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Appeal from Issuance of Low Power OL for Unit 1 & Request for Immediate Stay.Claim Made That Plant Cannot Be Safely Operated at Low Power Due to More than 20 Safety Exemptions
ML20108A178
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/10/1984
From: Anthony R
ANTHONY, R.L.
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#484-121 OL, NUDOCS 8411140489
Download: ML20108A178 (1)


Text

IN UNITED STATES UUCLEAR REGULATORY COM'aISSION RE: FHILADELFRIA ELECT 2IC CO.

Limerick.Ge:nerating Sta. Units 1 and 2 D 5 52,353

  • Joy. 10,1984 AIPEAL TO THE ComIISSION FROM THE ISSUING OF A[07,,PO,WER OPERATIUG LICERSE TO PECO, FR0ld R.L. AUTHONY/FCE. AFD REQUEST FOR AN IlciEDIATE STAY.

Anthony /F0E hereby appeal the issuing of a low power license to PEco and petition the- Cocmis,.sion for an immediej.te stay.

~

1. We learned only indirectly of the license from the Appeal Board Order served 10/30/84, addressed to us as an intervenor and Del-Awara,Unitd.-

ile claim a violation of LB Order of 10/14/81, 19NRC 866, which instructed all parties to serve all parties. We were not notified of the' issuance of this l'icense and we petition the Commission to invoke sanctions against NRC and PECo.

2. We claim that the Limerick plant cannot be safely operated at low poher because of the more than twenty safety exemptions that have been re-quested by PEco and gran ted by NRC.

3 An appeal from NRC decisions on our appeals against the bringing of nuclear fuel to the plant .in this past spring is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court. B.riefs have been filed and the Court is now in a position to rule on whether the fuel was brought to the plant in violation of the regulations and statutes. NRC was in er:sor to issue a license until this ma:tter of' illogal shipment, storage,and loading- of fuel is decided by the Court. The NRC license prejudices my case before the Court.

4 We request an immediate stay on the basis that : av) we expect the Appeals Court will decide in our favor and will ordhr the fuel removed as we have requested, b.).the loading of fuel and start of the reaction j process sets in motion an inerorable chain of operatiors which lead to releases poisons of radioactive and the damaging of my envirnment with possible fatal effects on my health and safety, c.) PECo may have.its plans to operate the reactor yg impeeded but we are convinced 'that an operating license for full power will

~

~ 7 be held up by litigati,on,possibly for ye rs e and d.) if PECo were to cancel wo '

g ' Limerick # 1 immediately the investment could be paid off over ten years,as

o-m
s:

has happened with other nuclear plants,and rates for the public would be less Q than if the plant operated,and PEco's financial situation nould improve,too.

w I certify copies to:

" Appeal Br'. . Judges , LB Judgss, NRC Counsel., Re3.pectfullyuubitted' g

"$ Docketing and Serv., Conner and Wetterhe.hn- M M, d<

M mac Limerick Ecol. Action,' Del-Aware Box 186 Meylan Pa.19065 $g

.