ML20083G698

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:06, 19 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Final Deficiency Rept,Condition 260 Re Insufficient Flow to HXs in Standby Svc Water Loops a & B.B&R Evaluating Design Error.Also Reported Per Part 21
ML20083G698
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1983
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
REF-PT21-83 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, 260, G2-83-1172, GO2-83-1172, NUDOCS 8401040318
Download: ML20083G698 (3)


Text

..

RECENED unc Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland,Washin n 3g f30$372-5000 December 20, 1983 1 G02-83-1172 '

REGION Vl&F Mr. J. B. Martin Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Revion V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 10CFR50.55(e) REPORTABLE CONDITION #260 STANDBY SERVICE WATER FLOW PROBLEMS REVISED FINAL REPORT

References:

1. Telecon QA2-83-178, dated July 21, 1983, L.C. Floyd to R. Dodds
2. Letter BRG0-83-004, Rev. 1, dated August 12, 1983, F.J. Patti to J.P. Collins
3. Letter G02-83-761, dated August 11, 1983, C.S. Carlisle to J.B. Martin
4. Letter G02-83-1017, dated November 3, 1983, J.W. Shannon to J.B. Martin In accordance with provisions of 10CFR50.55(e), your office was informed by the references above of the subject condition. Reference 4 transmitted our final report; however, at Mr. Dodd's request, we are submitting a re-vised final response to more clearly define when the work will be completed.

The attachment to this letter provides the Project's revised final report on Condition #260.

If you have any questions, please contact Roger Johnson, WNP-2 Project QA Manager, at (509) 377-2501, extension 2712.

$. -, #J G.'C. orensen Manager, Regulatory Programs JGT/jdb

Attachment:

As stated cc: W.S. Chin, BPA N.D. Lewis, EFSEC A. Toth, NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk, NRC DR 0

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 DOCKET N0. 50-397 LICENSE NO. CPPR-93 EVALUATION OF P0TENTIAL 10CFT50.55(e) CONDITION #260 STANDBY SERVICE WATER FLOW PROBLEMS REVISED FINAL REPORT Description of Deficiency Startup testing identified insufficient flow to several heat exchangers in Standby Service Water (SSW) Loops A and B.

Safety Implication Insufficient service water flow through heat exchangers could cause failure of safety-related equipment due to overheating. Failure of this equipment could preclude safe shutdown of the reactor. The design as issued for con-struction was deficient and required both physical and operational changes to meet and maintain design flow conditions. The condition is considered to be a reportable deficiency under 10CFR50.55(e) and Part 21 criteria.

Cause of the Deficiency Design errors in the original system pressure drop calculations have been determined to be the cause for the low flow condition to the safety-related equipment. The condition was further accentuated by excessive pipe fouling which contributed to, but was not the actual cause for, low flow condition.

Action to Prevent Recurrence A chemical treatment program is required to control water quality so as to prevent future material buildup and fouling of the piping system.

Two factors should reduce the possibility of design errors in pressure drop /

flow calculations in the future.

1) We are now using a computer program for such calculations. This allows modelling of all loops of large parallel systems.

I 2) We now have available the as-built configuration of the piping within the plant upon which to base calculations.

Corrective Action-The Standby Service Water (SSW) system was chemically cleaned to remove the

! deposited materials and chemical treatment of system has been implemented by the Supply System. The SSW System Valve Lineup has been altered to main-tain these conditions through Project Engineering Directive (PED) 215-M-X473.

l r

.e Final Report #260 Page 2 of 2 Corrective Action (Continued)

Burns and Roe-has resolved the design error covered by Startup problem Report (SPR) 2807 by issuing PED 215-M-X329 to install a bypass around orifices SW-RO-2A and 2B. Throttling of Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Heat Exchanger inlet and outlet valves (RHR-V-14A/B and RHR-V-68A/B) will further alter the service water system pressure drop configuration providing increased available pressure drop for the various. heat exchangers and increase the. flow through them. Startup testing has been done to achieve minimal throttling on each gate valve while obtaining.the necessary flows through the heat exchangers. Data has been forwarded to Burns and Roe for dispositioning SPR-2808 without any further modification to the system.

This configuration will be used for system operation pending completion of an engineering evaluation on the most appropriate method for eliminating the need to throttle the RHR valves. The resulting system modification will be made prior to completion of the first refueling outage.

t l

l l

l I t-