|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20212B1681999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-12 & 50-323/99-12 on 990711- 08-21.Four Violations Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210H6181999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-07 & 50-323/99-07 on 990503- 0714.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML18107A7011999-06-25025 June 1999 Requests Rev of NRC Records to Reflect Change of PG&E Address ML20205J3381999-04-0808 April 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision Expired. Commission Declined Any Review & Became Final Agency Action on 990406.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990409 DCL-99-038, Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f)1999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f) DCL-99-033, Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl1999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl DCL-99-010, Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld1999-01-26026 January 1999 Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld ML20202A9831999-01-18018 January 1999 Informs That Modesto Irrigation District No Longer Seeking Addl Interconnection with Pacific Gas & Electric Co at Pittsburg,Ca & Matters First Addressed in 980429 Comments in Opposition to Restructuring of Util Have Now Become Moot IR 05000275/19980121999-01-13013 January 1999 Informs That Insp Repts 50-275/98-12 & 50-323/98-12 Have Been Canceled DCL-98-163, Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1998-11-24024 November 1998 Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld ML20195G5161998-11-16016 November 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-16 & 50-323/98-16 on 980913- 1024.No Violations Noted ML20155F7951998-11-0303 November 1998 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Records Subj to Request Encl & Identified in App C DCL-98-123, Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals1998-09-0909 September 1998 Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals DCL-98-108, Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year..1998-08-0707 August 1998 Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year.. ML20236T2931998-07-24024 July 1998 Forwards Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities for 5 Yrs.Order Being Issued Due to Falsification of Info on Application to Obtain Unescorted Access to PG&E Plant ML20236T3431998-07-22022 July 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-11 & 50-323/98-11 on 980526-28.Apparent Violations Identified & Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML20236J2251998-07-0101 July 1998 Ltr Contract,Task Order 232 Entitled, Review of Callaway, Comanche,Diablo Canyon & Wolf Creek Applications for Conversion to Improved TS Based on Standard TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20236G0691998-06-19019 June 1998 Forwards Endorsement 123 to Neila Policy NF-228,Endorsement 145 to Neila Policy NF-113,Endorsement 124 to Neila Policy NF-228 & Endorsement 89 to Maelu Policy MF-103 IR 05000275/19980051998-04-17017 April 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-05 & 50-323/98-05 on 980202-06 & 23-27 & 0302-18.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Resolution of Previous NRC Insp Findings & Included Review of Issues Identified During Architect/Engineering Insp Rept ML20203G0371998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Revised Copy of NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement - Licensee, (10/97) Encl 1,which Has Been Revised to Reflect Current Operator Licensing Policy DCL-98-014, Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1998-02-10010 February 1998 Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld ML20199H6691998-02-0202 February 1998 Ack Receipt of ,Transmitting Rev 18,change 11, to Plant Physical Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Role of Video Capture Audible Alarm Sys Needs to Be Addressed in Security Plan,Per 980123 Telcon DCL-97-187, Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1997-11-19019 November 1997 Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld IR 05000275/19970181997-10-31031 October 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/97-18 & 50-323/97-18 on 971006- 10.Insp Verified That Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program Was Properly Implemented.No Violations Noted DCL-97-156, Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld1997-09-16016 September 1997 Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld ML20210H4671997-08-0202 August 1997 Requests That NRC Suspend Investigation & Review of Issues Raised by Modesto Irrigation District & Transmission Agency of Northern CA Re Contention That PG&E Had Violated Nuclear License Conditions Known as Stanislaus Commitments ML20137N1591997-03-31031 March 1997 Informs That Licensee Facility Scheduled to Administer NRC GFE on 970409.Sonalsts,Inc Authorized Under Contract to Support NRC Administration of GFE Activities ML16343A4801997-02-25025 February 1997 Forwards non-proprietary WCAP-14796 & Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methodology. Proprietary Rept Withheld,Per 10CFR2.90 ML20134H6271997-02-10010 February 1997 Fifth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App I Encl & Available in Pdr.App J Records Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) & App K Records Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20134K3421997-02-0606 February 1997 Conveys Results & Conclusions of Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation Conducted by NRR at Plant,Units 1 & 2, on 960909-12.W/o Encl ML16342D5291997-01-31031 January 1997 Transmits WCAPs Supporting NRCs Review of License Amend Request 96-10,rev of TSs to Support Extended Fuel Cycles to 24 months.WCAP-11082,rev 5,WCAP-11594,rev 2 & WCAP-14646,rev 1 Withheld ML16342D5331997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests Proprietary Version of WCAP-14646,rev 1, Instrumentation Calibration & Drift Evaluation for Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1997 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5311997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests That WCAP-11594,rev 2, W Improved Thermal Design Procedure Instrument Uncertainty Methodology,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5321997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests WCAP-11082,rev 5, Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology for Protection Sys,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1996 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML20136C3521997-01-11011 January 1997 Discusses Japan Oil Spill & Np Intake & Possibilities of Such Event Occurring at SONGS or Dcnpp ML20133F8961997-01-0909 January 1997 Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received on 961210 Which Requested Further Info Re Utils Violations of Conditions of Its Nuclear Licenses Designated to Promote & Protect Competition in Bulk Power Market in Northern & Central CA ML20133F8721997-01-0909 January 1997 Acks & Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received by Undersigned on 961210 Requesting Further Info to Document Tancs Assertion,Per Filing on 960429 That Util Has Violated Terms & Conditions of Nuclear Power Project Licenses ML16342D5521996-12-18018 December 1996 Requests That Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methology, Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(b)(4)) ML20129J4001996-10-18018 October 1996 Forwards Order Approving Corporate Restructuring by Establishment of Holding Company & Safety Evaluation NSD-NRC-96-4846, Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl1996-10-16016 October 1996 Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl ML20129G6121996-09-24024 September 1996 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App C,E,F & G.Documents Available in Pdr.App E,F & G Documents Partially Withheld Ref FOIA Exemptions 4 & 6.App D Record Listed as Copyright DCL-96-170, Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1996-08-14014 August 1996 Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld DCL-96-141, Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1996-07-31031 July 1996 Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld ML20116B8411996-07-22022 July 1996 Forwards Revisions to SR 95-03,SR 95-04 & SR 95-05 Re EDG 1-2 Valid Failures ML20117E6171996-05-24024 May 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 11 to EPIP EP R-7, Off-Site Transportation Accidents DCL-96-102, Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1996-05-0606 May 1996 Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld DCL-96-096, Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 151996-04-16016 April 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 15 DCL-96-054, Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld1996-02-28028 February 1996 Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld 1999-09-13
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML18107A7011999-06-25025 June 1999 Requests Rev of NRC Records to Reflect Change of PG&E Address DCL-99-038, Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f)1999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f) DCL-99-033, Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl1999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl DCL-99-010, Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld1999-01-26026 January 1999 Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld ML20202A9831999-01-18018 January 1999 Informs That Modesto Irrigation District No Longer Seeking Addl Interconnection with Pacific Gas & Electric Co at Pittsburg,Ca & Matters First Addressed in 980429 Comments in Opposition to Restructuring of Util Have Now Become Moot DCL-98-163, Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1998-11-24024 November 1998 Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld DCL-98-123, Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals1998-09-0909 September 1998 Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals DCL-98-108, Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year..1998-08-0707 August 1998 Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year.. ML20236G0691998-06-19019 June 1998 Forwards Endorsement 123 to Neila Policy NF-228,Endorsement 145 to Neila Policy NF-113,Endorsement 124 to Neila Policy NF-228 & Endorsement 89 to Maelu Policy MF-103 DCL-98-014, Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1998-02-10010 February 1998 Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld DCL-97-187, Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1997-11-19019 November 1997 Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld DCL-97-156, Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld1997-09-16016 September 1997 Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld ML20210H4671997-08-0202 August 1997 Requests That NRC Suspend Investigation & Review of Issues Raised by Modesto Irrigation District & Transmission Agency of Northern CA Re Contention That PG&E Had Violated Nuclear License Conditions Known as Stanislaus Commitments ML16343A4801997-02-25025 February 1997 Forwards non-proprietary WCAP-14796 & Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methodology. Proprietary Rept Withheld,Per 10CFR2.90 ML16342D5291997-01-31031 January 1997 Transmits WCAPs Supporting NRCs Review of License Amend Request 96-10,rev of TSs to Support Extended Fuel Cycles to 24 months.WCAP-11082,rev 5,WCAP-11594,rev 2 & WCAP-14646,rev 1 Withheld ML16342D5321997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests WCAP-11082,rev 5, Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology for Protection Sys,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1996 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5331997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests Proprietary Version of WCAP-14646,rev 1, Instrumentation Calibration & Drift Evaluation for Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1997 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5311997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests That WCAP-11594,rev 2, W Improved Thermal Design Procedure Instrument Uncertainty Methodology,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20136C3521997-01-11011 January 1997 Discusses Japan Oil Spill & Np Intake & Possibilities of Such Event Occurring at SONGS or Dcnpp ML20133F8961997-01-0909 January 1997 Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received on 961210 Which Requested Further Info Re Utils Violations of Conditions of Its Nuclear Licenses Designated to Promote & Protect Competition in Bulk Power Market in Northern & Central CA ML20133F8721997-01-0909 January 1997 Acks & Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received by Undersigned on 961210 Requesting Further Info to Document Tancs Assertion,Per Filing on 960429 That Util Has Violated Terms & Conditions of Nuclear Power Project Licenses ML16342D5521996-12-18018 December 1996 Requests That Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methology, Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(b)(4)) NSD-NRC-96-4846, Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl1996-10-16016 October 1996 Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl DCL-96-170, Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1996-08-14014 August 1996 Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld DCL-96-141, Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1996-07-31031 July 1996 Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld ML20116B8411996-07-22022 July 1996 Forwards Revisions to SR 95-03,SR 95-04 & SR 95-05 Re EDG 1-2 Valid Failures ML20117E6171996-05-24024 May 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 11 to EPIP EP R-7, Off-Site Transportation Accidents DCL-96-102, Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1996-05-0606 May 1996 Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld DCL-96-096, Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 151996-04-16016 April 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 15 DCL-96-054, Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld1996-02-28028 February 1996 Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld ML20100L4631996-02-23023 February 1996 Forwards Response to NRC Enforcement Action 95-279 Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-275/95-17 & 50-323/95-17 on 951021-1208.Corrective Actions:Directive Was Issued to Plan 2R7 W/Six Day Work Schedule DCL-96-036, Forwards Public Version of Rev 18 to EPIP EP EF-1, Activation & Operation of Technical Support Ctr1996-02-20020 February 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 18 to EPIP EP EF-1, Activation & Operation of Technical Support Ctr ML20097E9341996-01-25025 January 1996 Forwards Public Version of EPIP Update for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 DCL-95-272, Supports Comments Submitted by NEI Re Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses,With Listed Exception.Nrc Should Allow Traning Requirement to Be Met by on-job Training1995-12-11011 December 1995 Supports Comments Submitted by NEI Re Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses,With Listed Exception.Nrc Should Allow Traning Requirement to Be Met by on-job Training DCL-95-264, Forwards Change 6 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.55(d)(5))1995-12-0606 December 1995 Forwards Change 6 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.55(d)(5)) ML20094M6001995-11-21021 November 1995 Forwards Final Rept of Investigation & Analysis of Event 29257 Re Substandard Fastner Processed & Sold by Cardinal Industrial Products,Lp,So That Customers Can Evaluate Situation in Light of 10CFR21.21(a)(1)(ii) & (b)(1) DCL-95-204, Forwards Proposed Changes to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld1995-09-19019 September 1995 Forwards Proposed Changes to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld DCL-95-199, Requests Exemption to 10CFR73.55 & Provides Draft Changes to Plant Physical Security Plan1995-09-14014 September 1995 Requests Exemption to 10CFR73.55 & Provides Draft Changes to Plant Physical Security Plan ML20087A0471995-07-28028 July 1995 Forwards Security Safeguards Info in Form of Change to Proposed Draft Plant Security Program.Encl Withheld DCL-95-153, Forwards Public Files Version of Revised Corporate Emergency Response Plan Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 14 to 1.1,Rev 8 to 1.2,Rev 11 to 2.1,Rev 5 to 3.1,Rev 12 to 3.2,Rev 6 to 3.5,Rev 14 to 4.3.W/950807 Release Memo1995-07-27027 July 1995 Forwards Public Files Version of Revised Corporate Emergency Response Plan Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 14 to 1.1,Rev 8 to 1.2,Rev 11 to 2.1,Rev 5 to 3.1,Rev 12 to 3.2,Rev 6 to 3.5,Rev 14 to 4.3.W/950807 Release Memo DCL-95-134, Forwards Rev 4 of Diablo Canyon Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(d)1995-07-0505 July 1995 Forwards Rev 4 of Diablo Canyon Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(d) ML20086H5461995-06-29029 June 1995 Forwards Final Exercise Rept for 931020,full Participation Plume Exposure & Ingestion Pathway Exercise of Offsite Radiological Emergency Response plans,site-specific to Plant.No Deficiencies Noted DCL-95-046, Submits Summary Description of Proposed Vehicle Control Measures Per 10CFR73.55.Encl Withheld1995-02-28028 February 1995 Submits Summary Description of Proposed Vehicle Control Measures Per 10CFR73.55.Encl Withheld DCL-95-039, Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including EPIP Table of Contents,Rev 18 to EP G-2,rev 3 to EP OR-3,rev 17 to EP EF-1 & Rev 3 to EP EF-9.W/950306 Release Memo1995-02-23023 February 1995 Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including EPIP Table of Contents,Rev 18 to EP G-2,rev 3 to EP OR-3,rev 17 to EP EF-1 & Rev 3 to EP EF-9.W/950306 Release Memo ML18101A5671995-02-17017 February 1995 Informs of Improper Presentation of Jet Expansion Model in Bechtel Technical rept,BN-TOP-2,Rev 2 Design for Pipe Break Effects Issued May 1974.NRC May Need to Consider Evaluating Consequences of Potential Misapplication of Expansion Model ML18101A5681995-02-17017 February 1995 Requests NRC to Clarify Whether Plant Should Declare ESF Portion of Ssps Inoperable & Enter TS 3.0.3 LCO Under Circumstances as Ref in in 95-10.Subj in Re Postulated Slb W/Potential to Render One Train of Ssps Inoperable ML18101A5741995-02-17017 February 1995 Requests Clarification of Whether Plant Should Declare ESF Portion of Ssps Inoperable & Enter TS 3.0.3 Limiting Conditions for Operation Under Circumstances Described in Info Notice 95-10 DCL-95-033, Forwards Public Version of Rev 3,Change 14 to Corporate Emergency Response Plan (Cerp) & Cerp Implementing Procedures1995-02-13013 February 1995 Forwards Public Version of Rev 3,Change 14 to Corporate Emergency Response Plan (Cerp) & Cerp Implementing Procedures DCL-95-013, Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Rev 11A to EP RB-11,rev 7A to EP RB-15:F,rev 4A to EP RB-15:G,rev 15A to EP EF-2 & Rev 14D to EP G-4.W/950208 Release Memo1995-01-24024 January 1995 Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Rev 11A to EP RB-11,rev 7A to EP RB-15:F,rev 4A to EP RB-15:G,rev 15A to EP EF-2 & Rev 14D to EP G-4.W/950208 Release Memo DCL-94-258, Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Rev 11A to EP RB-8,Rev 4B to EP RB-10,Rev 5 to EP RB-12,on-spot Change to Rev 9 to EP RB-15:C,Rev 16A to EP EF-1 & Rev 3B to EP EF-3B1994-11-21021 November 1994 Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Rev 11A to EP RB-8,Rev 4B to EP RB-10,Rev 5 to EP RB-12,on-spot Change to Rev 9 to EP RB-15:C,Rev 16A to EP EF-1 & Rev 3B to EP EF-3B 1999-06-25
[Table view] |
Text
ACCELERATED DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REGULSTQ INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDE)
ACCESSION. NBR:9307210082 DOC:DATE: 93/07/07 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET FACIL:50-275 Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Pacific Ga 05000275 50-323 Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Pacific Ga 05000323 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION RUEGER,G.M. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Forwards License Amend Request 93-04 to Licenses DPR-80 &
DPR-82,revising TS 5.1.3, "Map Defining Unrestricted Area's &-
Site Boundary for Radioactive Gaseous -& Liquid Effluents,"
for consistency w/10CFR20.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PDV LA 1 1 PDV PD 1 ~
1 PETERSONFS 2 2 INTERNAL: ACRS 6 6 NRR/DE/EELB 1 "-1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRPW/OTSB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OC/LFDCB 1 0 OGC/HDS1 1 0 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1, 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR i LAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
P+
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR ~X ENCL
l,j q
)
i 8 ~ r '
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street, Room1451 Gregory M. Rueger P.O. Box 770000 Senior Vice President and San Francisco, CA 94177 General Manager 415/973-4684 Nuclear Power Generation Fax 415/973-2313 July 7, 1993 PG&E Letter No. DCL-93-169 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket No. 50-275, OL-DPR-80 Docket No. 50-323, OL-DPR-82 Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 License Amendment Request 93-04 Revision of Technical Specification 5. 1.3 Change Due to Revision of 10 CFR 20 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is an application for amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82. The enclosed license amendment request (LAR) proposes to revise Technical Specification (TS) 5. 1.3, "Hap Defining Unrestricted Areas and Site Boundary for Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluents," to be consistent with a recent interpretation of the restricted area definition in 10 CFR 20.
The changes proposed in this LAR are not required to address an immediate safety concern. 'PG&E believes the NRC should assign a low priority to the review of the proposed changes. However, to maintain consistency between the TS and 10 CFR 20, PG&E requests that the revised TS be made effective on January 1, 1994.
Sincerely, Gregor M. Rueger CC: Edgar Bailey, DHS Bobby H. Faulkenberry Ann P. Hodgdon f4ary H. Hiller Sheri R. Peterson CPUC Diablo Distribution Enclosure 6170S/85K/PTN/263 rOf (IF' 9307ZR008Z 930707 05000275 PDR ADOCK P PDR
PG Letter No. DCL-93-169 ENCLOSURE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
) Docket No. 50-275 In The Hatter of ) Facility Operating License PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) No. DPR-80
)
Diablo Canyon Power Plant ) Docket No. 50-323 Units 1 and 2 ) Facility Operating License No. DPR-82 License Amendment Request No. 93-04 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Pacific Gas and Electric Company hereby applies to amend its Diablo Canyon Power Plant Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82 (License).
The proposed changes revise the Technical Specifications (TS) (Appendix A of the Licenses) regarding TS 5. 1.3, "Hap Defining Unrestricted Areas and Site Boundary for Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluents." Information on the proposed changes is provided in Attachments A and B.
These changes have been reviewed and are considered not to involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92 or an unreviewed environmental question. Further, there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed changes.
Sincerely, Gregory M. Rueger Subscribed and sworn to before me Attorneys for Pacific Gas and this 7th day of July 1993. Electric Company Howard V. Golub Christopher J. Warner Adriane D. ee, otary Public Christ pher . Warner ADPIANE D. TOLEFPEE COMM. 4 979198 Notary Pubtio California 6170S/85K ~ sANFPANceco coUNIY g
Q3Q7Q/QQSQ +3Q7Q7 ...,:.ym.ExPirosDEC22.1996 PDR *DOCK 05000278".'DR
4i. 4 1 M,. 'tc E '
a ,n ~ C.
i 1
't i C
ATTACHMENT A REVISION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 5.1.3 CHANGE DUE TO REVISION OF 10 CFR 20 A. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT REQUEST This license amendment request (LAR) proposes to change Technical Specification (TS) 5. 1.3, "Map Defining Unrestricted Areas and Site Boundary for Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluents," to remove two references to a restricted area.
The proposed changes to the TS are noted in the marked-up copy of the applicable TS (Attachment B).
B. BACKGROUND On May 21, 1991, revisions to 10 CFR 20 were published in the Federal Register. Included in the changes to 10 CFR 20 were the addition of the definition of member(s) of the public and the removal of residential quarters from the definition of unrestricted area.
Member(s) of the public, unrestricted area, and restricted area are defined in the TS for the purpose of personnel protection from radiation and radiological materials during normal plant operations.
In accordance with the definitions in the original version of 10 CFR 20, a restricted area is any area that is controlled by a licensee for the purpose of protecting individuals from exposure to radiation or radioactive materials. Any dose that is received in a restricted area is considered occupational exposure. An unrestricted area is any area in which access is not controlled or limited by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation or radioactive materials, and any area used for living quarters.
In accordance with the new revision to 10 CFR 20, an unrestricted area is any area to which access is neither controlled nor limited by the licensee. A member of the public is any individual outside a restricted area not receiving occupational dose. A member of the public is controlled to more restrictive radiation exposure limits than an individual that receives occupational radiation exposure. The definition of restricted area did not change as a result of the revision to 10 CFR 20.
A recent NRC interpretation of 10 CFR 19. 12 (Reference 1) resulting from the recent revision of 10 CFR 20 was provided to NUMARC in a letter dated September 14, 1992. This interpretation was contained in a series of question and answer sets concerning the revision of 10 CFR 20 that were primarily intended for training NRC inspectors. From information in the question and answer sets, it would appear that the NRC expects that in the future, individuals that infrequently enter a restricted area must be provided (1) some instruction concerning radiation and 6170S/85K
radioactive materials, and (2) must be informed that they are subject to occupational dose limits, regardless of the potential radiological health protection concerns.
In order to limit the number of infrequent visitors that require training concerning radiation and radioactive materials, and to allow them to be more appropriately controlled to member-of-the-public dose limits, the size of the restricted area is being reduced to eliminate areas where exposure is well below allowable member-of-the-public dose limits.
C. JUSTIFICATION Redefining the restricted area will allow Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) to comply with recent interpretations of 10 CFR 19. 12 expected to be implemented in the future. Additionally, the deletion of the restricted area from TS 5. 1.3, Figure 5. 1-3, allows radiation exposure for members of the public and certain classifications of employees to be more appropriately controlled to member-of-the-public dose limits when on portions of the site where no radiological health protection concerns exist.
D. SAFETY EVALUATION The restricted area is currently defined in Figure 5. 1-3 of TS 5. 1.3 as all property within the site boundary. Upon removal of the reference to restricted area from Figure 5. 1-3, a new, smaller restricted area will be established. The new restricted area will be defined and controlled in plant procedures in accordance with the requirements of the recent revision to 10 CFR 20.
Environmental monitoring of the area between the unrestricted area and the new, smaller restricted area has demonstrated that dose in the proposed controlled area resulting from normal plant operations is well below the member-of-the-public dose limits. Consequently, a radiological health protection concern does not exist, and the removal of the restricted area from Figure 5. 1-3 will have no affect on the dose that a member of the public receives.
The removal of the restricted area from Figure 5. 1-3 will have no impact on the determination of effluent release doses since the effluent release dose rates are based on the site boundary. The removal of the restricted area will have no impact on the emergency plan, since emergency plan limits are based on the exclusion area boundary.
Finally, the removal of the restricted area will have no impact on the security plan since the area previously designated as a restricted area will still be controlled by PG&E. Current security procedures are adequate to limit access to the area between the unrestricted area and the new, smaller restricted area.
Based on the above evaluation, PGKE believes there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be adversely affected by the proposed TS changes.
6170S/85K
E. NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION PGLE has evaluated the no significant hazards considerations involved with the proposed amendment, focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c) as quoted below:
The Commission may make a final determination, pursuant to the procedures in paragraph 50.91, that a proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility licensed under paragraph 50.21(b) or paragraph 50.22 or a testing facility involves no significant hazards considerations, if operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not:
(1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind 'of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The following evaluation is provided for the no significant hazards consideration standards.
Does the change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
A change to the defined restricted area has no affect on any plant operating parameters. Consequently, a change to the defined restricted area will not affect the probability or consequences of an accident occurring.
Therefore, the proposed changes does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
- 2. Does the change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
The proposed revision to the DCPP TS is administrative in nature.
Further, the proposed changes would not result in any physical alteration to any plant system, and there would not be a change in the method by which any safety-related system performs its function.
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
- 3. Does the change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
The proposed revision to the DCPP TS does not affect the margin of safety of any accident analysis since it does not affect the parameters for any accident analysis, and has no effect on the 6170S/85K s
current operating methodologies or actions which govern plant performance.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
F. NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION Based on the above safety evaluation, PG&E concludes that the changes proposed by this LAR satisfy the no significant hazards consideration standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) and, accordingly, a no significant hazards finding is justified.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PGLE has evaluated the proposed changes and determined the changes do not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Accordingly, the proposed changes meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental assessment of the proposed changes is not required.
H. REFERENCES
- 1. Letter from F. Congel to J. Schmitt dated September 14, 1992 6170S/85K
4