ML17342A595

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:48, 14 September 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leakage Rate Test, Types A,B & C Periodic Test,Turkey Point Plant Unit 4.
ML17342A595
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/1986
From:
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17342A594 List:
References
NUDOCS 8606270299
Download: ML17342A595 (81)


Text

REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST TYPES A, B, AND C PERIODIC TEST FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NO.4 MARCH 1986 8606270gcP9

@~0~~~PDR ADoCg 050002 PDR 4 PREPARED BY STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS t,)a.V<

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title~Pa e TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ATTACHMENTS REFERENCES PURPOSE SU>MARY 2.1 TYPE A TEST 2.2 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)TYPE A TEST 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS 3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION

3.2.1 Prerequisites

3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation 3.2.3 Data Acquisition System 3.2.4 Data Resolution System 3o3 TEST RESULTS 3.3.1 Presentation of Test Results 2-1 2-1 2-2 3-1 3-1 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-4 3-4 3-6 3-6 3.3.2 ILRT Results-Mass Point Method/3.3.3 ILRT Results-Total Time Method 3.3.4 Superimposed Leakage Verification Test Results 3-6 3-6 3-6 3.3.5 Type C Corrections LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TESTS (Types B and C)3-7 4-1

'O4 Il, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment 3.2A 3.2B 3.2C Title Site Meteorology Instrumentation List Instrumentation Location-RHD's (Profile View)3.2D 3.2E 3.2F 3.3A 3.3B 3.3C 3.3D Instrumentation Location-RHD's (Plan View)Instrumentation Location-RTD's (Profile View)Instrumentation Location-RTD's (Plan View)ILRT-Input Variables Leakage Rate Data-Mass Point Leakage Rate Data-Total Time Graph 1-Containment Mass versus Time 3'E Graph 2-Containment Leakage Rate and UCL versus Time (Mass Point)3.3F Graph 3-Calculated Containment Leakage Rate and UCL versus Time (Total Time)3.3G Superimposed Leakage Verification Test Data (Reduced Input Variables, Mass Point, Total Time Results)4A 1986 Local Leakage Rate Test Data 4B 1984 Local Leakage Rate Test Data 4C 1986 Local Leakage Rate Test Summary Analysis l l\I PI t REFERENCES 1.10CFR50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, October 22, 1980.2.Florida Power&Light Turkey Point Plant Operating Procedure 13100.1, Integrated Leakage Rate Test, and 13100.2, Valve Lineup for ILRT.3.ANSI N45.4, American National Standard Leakage-Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors, March 16, 1972.4.ANSI/ANS-56.8, Cqntainment System Leakage Testing Requirements, February 19, 1981.IP 5.Bechtel Corporation Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants, BN-TOP-l, Revision 1, November 1, 1972.1 This document used only as a guideline and any reference to said document in no way implies compliance.

SECTION 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a description and analysis of the March 1986 Periodic Type A Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test (ILRT), and a summary of the periodic Types B and C Local Leakage Rate Tests conducted since May 1983 on the Florida Power and Light Company's (FP&L)Turkey Point Plant, Unit No.4.Stone&Webster Engineering Corporation provided engineering consultation services to FP&L during the performance of this test.This report is submitted as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Paragraph V.B.(Reference 1).1-1 0

SECTION 2

SUMMARY

2.1 TYPE A TEST Pressurization for the ILRT began at 2356 hours0.0273 days <br />0.654 hours <br />0.0039 weeks <br />8.96458e-4 months <br /> on March 25, 1986.Investigations of all penetration areas for leakage were conducted during-the pressurization period and throughout the Type A test.Only minor leakage paths were identified.

Containment pressurization equipment was secured at approximately 0937 hours0.0108 days <br />0.26 hours <br />0.00155 weeks <br />3.565285e-4 months <br /> on March 26, 1986, with a peak instantaneous pressure of 67.148 psia.Temperature, humidity, and pressure data was continuously recorded throughout the entire test period at 15 minute intervals.

The temperature stabilization criteria was satisfied at 1915 hours0.0222 days <br />0.532 hours <br />0.00317 weeks <br />7.286575e-4 months <br /> on March 26, 1986.The Type A test was successfully completed from 1930 hours0.0223 days <br />0.536 hours <br />0.00319 weeks <br />7.34365e-4 months <br /> on March 26, 1986 to 0500 hours0.00579 days <br />0.139 hours <br />8.267196e-4 weeks <br />1.9025e-4 months <br /> on March 27, 1986, with a Mass Point Upper Confidence Limit (UCL-MP)of 0.083594 percent/day and a Total Time Upper Confidence Limit (UCL-TT)of 0,108892 percent/day, (See Section 3.3, Test Results).Both the Mass Point and the Total Time leakage rates were well below the Turkey Point 0.75 L acceptance criteria of 0.1875 percent per day.a The Type A test duration was extended by.approximately one and one-half hours.This, was done'to closely monitor the slight change in the mass trend which occurred at approximately midnight of March 26, 1986.Reference the mass and leakage rate graphs of Attachments 3.3D through 3.3F.A review of Attachment 3.3A indicates that at approximately 2330 hours0.027 days <br />0.647 hours <br />0.00385 weeks <br />8.86565e-4 months <br /> on March 26, 1986 (which is 4.250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> after the start of the Type A test), the temperature and pressure trends essentially stabilized.

This brought about a very slight change in the mass trend.Once additional data was obtained it was readily determined that a significant break in the trends had not occured.A subsequent review of all the individual sensor readings did not reveal any abnormalities.

The superimposed leakage verification test was started at 0630 hours0.00729 days <br />0.175 hours <br />0.00104 weeks <br />2.39715e-4 months <br /> and was successfully completed at 1115 hours0.0129 days <br />0.31 hours <br />0.00184 weeks <br />4.242575e-4 months <br /> on March 27, 1986.The results of the verification test satisfied the requirements set forth in References 4 and 5, (See Section 3.3, Test Results).Depressurization of the containment commenced at 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br /> on March 27,'986 and was completed in the early evening.2-1 1

2.2 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TESTS (Types B and C)The Local Leakage Rate Tests (LLRT's)of containment isolation valves and other primary containment penetrations were conducted as,.required by the methods described in FP&L's Operating Procedure No.13404.1,"Containment Boundary Isolation Valves-Local Leakage Rate Tests" since the last Unit No.4 Type A Test performed in May 1983.Section 4 of this report summarizes the data for the two surveillance periods (1984 and 1986)of LLRT's conducted since the last Type A Test in accordance with Appendix J, 10CFR50, Paragraph V.B.2-2 SECTION 3 TYPE A TEST 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS This log was edited from information contained in the Official Log of Events.March 25, 1986 2356-Containment pressurization was initiated.

Pressurization rate was approximately 6.0 pounds per hour.1farch 26, 1986 0300-Initiated leakage investigation of the penetration area.0410-No pressure observed in the Personnel and Emergency Hatch.0500-Penetration area leakage investigation completed.

Observed various minor leakages on opened vent valves and valve packing.Containment pressure was 44.3 psia.Containment average temperature was approximately 94 F.0 0800-Performed leakage investigation of the penetration area.Same minor leakages were observed.0900-Performed leakage investigation of exclusion areas.No leakage was noted.0937-Containment pressure was 67.148 psia.Compressors were secured, and the pressurization line was vented.1315-The pressure between the purge exhaust and supply valves was increasing.

Readings were approximately 2 psig and 28 psig, respectively.

1400-Performed leakage investigation of the penetration area.Same minor.leakages were observed.1915-Satisfied the temperature stabilization criteria of the teat procedure.

1930-Commenced the start of the Type A Test.3-1 March 27, 1986 0130-Performed leakage investigation of the penetration area.Same minor leakages were observed.0500-Satisfied Type A criteria for a reduced duration test.0530-Superimposed leakage rate was started.0630-Superimposed leakage verification test was started.1115-Superimposed leakage verification test criteria was satisfied.

1200-Depressurization of the containment commenced.

3-2 3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION

3.2.1 Prerequisites

In accordance with the Turkey Point Plant Unit No.4 ILRT Procedure 13100.1 (Reference 2), the following is a listing of the pertinent prerequisites that were completed and documented prior to containment pressurization:

a.General inspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment structures and components completed.

b.All equipment and instrumentation that could be damaged by test pressure removed or protected.

II c.All instrumentation required for the test.calibrated within six months of the test and functionally verified.d.All required system valve lineups completed, including closure of containment isolation valves.e.All required Types B and C local leakage rate testing completed.

f.The Official Log of Events established.

g.Site meteorological data recorded at least three days prior to and during the ILRT (Attachment 3.2A).h.Temporary containment air recirculation fans installed and tested.ILRT pressurization system properly installed and tested.All ILRT computer software used for test calculations tested and operational.

3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation Pressurization of the containment was achieved by the utilization of a temporary system consisting of ten air compressors manifolded to aftercoolers and refrigerant air dryers.The system included adequate instrumentation and valving to maintain proper monitoring and control of the compressed air quality throughout the pressurization sequence.The total capacity of the pressurization system was rated at approximately 11,000 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm).The various containment parameters required to calculate containment leakage during the test were monitored using instrumentation which consisted of 22 resistance temperature detectors (RTD's), 10 relative humidity detectors (RHD's), and an absolute pressure quartz manometer,.

Pertinent data for the test instrumentation is listed in Attachment 3.2B, and the general locations of the RTD's and RHD's are shown in Attachment 3.2C through 3.2F.A rotometer was used to perform the superimposed leakage verification test.3-3 3.2.3 Data Acquisition System The Turkey Point Plant Unit No.4 ILRT sensor data were recorded at approximately 15 minute intervals during the test.A programmable, multichannel data logger was used to scan and record data from 22 RTD's, 10 RHD's, and manometer signal inputs;Data readings of the rotometer were manually recorded.The ILRT utilized a portable programmable computer to average the test data.Periodically during the test period, weighted average temperature, air pressure, weighted average vapor pressure, and mass values were computed.3.2.4 Data Resolution System After the appropriate data had been acquired and averaged, the results were inputted to the Stone 6 Webster Engineering Corporation's (SWEC)portable computer for leakage rate calculations.

For the Turkey Point Plant Unit No.4 ILRT, both the Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis and Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis were used to determine the leakage rate.Absolute Method of Mass Point Anal sis The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis consists of calculating the air mass within the containment structure, over the test period, using pressure, temperature, and relative humidity observations made during the ILRT., The air mass is computed using the ideal gas law as follows: M 144V(P-Pv)

RT (Eq.1)where: M~air mass, ibm P~total pressure, psia Pv~average vapor pressure, psia R~53.35 ft-lbf/lb R (for air)m 0 T average containment temperature, g 3 V containment free volume, 1.55 x 10 ft The leakage rate is then determined by plotting the air mass as a function of time, using a least-squares fit to determine the slope, A~dM/dT.The leakage rate is expressed as a percentage of the air mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

Leakage Rate A/B(-2400)(Eq.2)Where A is the slope of the least-squares curve and B is the y-intercept.

The sign convention is such that the leakage out of the containment is positive, and the units are in percent/day, 3-4 (Eq 3)The air mass is calculated and the result is correlated as a function of time by means of a'least-squares curve fit of the form: M~At+B The slope A and y-intercept B are then used in Equation 2 to determine the leakage rate.A confidence interval is calculated using a Student's T distribution.

The sum of the leakage rate and confidence interval is the upper confidence limit-mass point (UCL-MP).Absolute Method of Total Time Anal sis The Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis consists of calculating air lost from the containment, using pressure, temperature, and relative humidity observations made during the ILRT.The containment air mass is computed using Equation 1.The measured leakage rate at any time (t)is then determined by subtracting the mass at that time (Mt)from the initial mass (Mi)and dividing by the initial mass.The measured leakage rate is expressed as a percentage of containment mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

Measured Leakage Rate Mi-Mt (2400)Mi (>t)(Eq.4)The sign convention is such that leakage out of the containment is positive, and the units are in percent/day.

The calculated leakage rate is then determined by plotting the measured leakage rate as a function of time and then performing a least-squares curve fit of the measured leakage rate values as follows: Calculated Leakage Rate At+B (Eq.5)where, A is the slope and B is the y-intercept of the least squares curve.The confidence interval is calculated in accordance with the'equations in Reference 5.The sum of the calculated leakage rate and the confidence interval is the upper confidence limit-total time (UCL-TT).This analysis method was used in con)unction with procedure 13100.1 (Reference 2).3-5 ATTACHMENT 3.2A SITE METEOROLOGY Date 3-23-86 3-24-86 3-25-86 Time 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Ambient Temperature (p 69 68 66 66 64 63 62 60 58 56 56 56 57 57 57 57 58 61 64 70 72 70 71 72 71 69 65 65 65 65 65 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 68 71 70 71 73 74 72 Page 1 of Barometric Pressure 30.36 30.37 30.38 30.40 30.40 30.41 30.42 30.40 30.37 30.37 30.36 30.36 30.37 30.37 30.40 30.44 30.46 30.48 30.48 30.47 30.47 30.42 30.41 30.40 30.41 30.42 30.43 30.43 30.45 30.45 30.45 30.45 30.42 30.40 30.38 30.36 30.25 30.40 30.41 30.43 30.45 30.33 30.33 30.31 30.30 30.25 Wind Velocity~(m h)11 8 5 10 6 9 12 10 12 12 7 ll 6 8 12 10 10 5 6 8 10 10 12 7 8 7 8 4 12 5 6 5 6 5 6 7 12 12 16 13 12 15 13 13 12 10 Wind Direction~(a z emu th 300 330 335 335 330 330 320 315 335 320 325 325 355 325 330 330 330 330 330 40 70 60 63 65 45 45 65 64 63 55 55 55 55 60 70 79 90 91 91 90 90 85 90 85 85 75 ATTACHMENT 3.2A (Continued)

SITE METEOROLOGY Date 3-26<<86 3-27-86 Time 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Ambient Temperature (P)72 70 68 66 65 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 65 65 66 66 67 66 66 67 67 68'3 73 74 74 74 74 72 71 71 71 71 72 72 67 66 66 66 65 65 71-72 76 76 78 Page 2 of Barometric Pressure (in.H 30.24 30.35 30.34 30.33 30.32 30.33 30.34 30.35 30.33 30.33 30.31 30.29 30.28 30.25 30.15 30.26 30.28 30.29 30.30 30.29 30.28 30.28 30.27 30.25 30.23 30.21 30.19 30.19 30.20 30.21 30.21 30.22 30.22 30.21 30.20 30.18 30.16 30.14 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.18 30.19 30.19 30.19 30.17 Wind Velocity~(m h 16 5 10 8 9 ll 10 10 10 14 8 8 7 7 6 13 4 5 7 ll ll 12 13 7 7 10 6 10 15.8 8 ll 7 7 8 10 7 5 8 4 5 7 3 9 ll 10 Wind Direction~(azimuth 85 98 85 90 70 75 105 105 405 415 415 410 410 410.90 404 75 100 110 440 445 450 450 450 450 445 425 440 480 435 435 445 425 445 425 55 46 39 55 40 305 300 60 65 75 60

~l, M h ATTACHMENT 3.2B\INSTRUMENTATION LIST The following instruments were calibrated or functionally verified within 6 months prior to the performance of this test and in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J, using instrumentation traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

Channel Elevation Instrument CH-9 CH-19 CH-20 CH-12 CH-14 CH-15 CH-1 CH-3 CH-4 CH-5 CH-2 CH-6 CH-7 CH-8 CH-21 CH-22 CH-10 CH-11 CH-13 CH-16 CH-17 CH-18 CH-50 CH-51 CH-52 CH-53 CH-54 CH-55 CH-56 CH-57 CH-58 CH-59 CH-80 TI-145 0-100 psia Quartz TI-145 0-100 psia Quartz Rotometer 20'0'0'4'9t 34'4'4'4'4'7'7'7'7'7t 143'43'43'43'0'0'4'4'4'4'7'43'43'TD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD RHD 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.060334 0.060334 0.060333 0.060333 0.060333 0.060333 0.053334 0.053334 0.053333 0.053333 0.053333 0.053333 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495 0.06 0.06 0.181 0.181 0.16 0.16 Manometer 1 1.0 Manometer 2.N/A 0>>28 scfm 8 50 psig Page 1 of 1+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+0.5 F+2.5%RH+2.5%RH-+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+2.5%RH+0.001%F.S.

+0.001%F.S.

+1.0%F.S.

CH-56 EL.143 EL.97 CH-57 CH-54 EL.64 CH-55 CH-52 EL.34 CH-53 EL.20 CH-50 CH-51 PROFILE VIEW ATTACHMENT 3.2C INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RELATIVE HUMIDITY DETECTORS (RHD S)TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 CH"50 CH.-51 CH-52 EL.20 EL.54 CH-53 CH-64 97'H-67'H-.58 97 CH-66 EL.64 (EL.97)CH-55 PLAN.VIEW EL.143 CH-59 ATTACHMENT 5.2D INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RELATIVE HUMIDITY DETECTORS (RHO S)TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4

CH-18 CH-I6 CH" 13 CH-17 CH" 10 CH-'11 CH-7 CH 8 CH-2'I EL.143 CH.22 CH-2'L.97 CH'6 CH.4 CH-3 CH-1 EL.64 CH.5 CH 12.CH-15 CH"14 EL.34 CH-9 EL 20 CH.20 CH-19 PROFILE VIEW ATTACHMENT 3.2E INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RESISTANCE TEMPERATURF DETECTORS (RTD S)TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4

CH" I9 CH-20 CH-5 CH-12 CH-9 0 29 CH-14 EL.20 EL.34 CH-1 97 CH-2 97 CH-5 CH-6 CH-10 CH-11 97 CH-7 97 CH-8 ,CH-IB CH-16 CH-17 (EL.97 97 CH-4, CH-21')97 CH-'5 CH.22 CH-15 PLAN VIEW EL.143 ATTACHMENT 3.2F INSTRUMENTATION lOCATION RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTORS (.RTD'S)TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4

I 0 3.3 TEST RESULTS 3.3.1 Presentation of Test Results The ILRT was conducted in accordance with the Turkey Point Plant Unit No.4 Operating Procedure 13100.1.The results for the ILRT and for the Superimposed Leakage Verification Test are shown below: 3.3.2 ILRT Results-Mass Point Method 1.Leakage Rate Calculated, Lam 2.Upper Confidence Level 3.Type C Corrections (See'3.3.5) 4.Total Reported Type A Leakage Rate 0.079923 0.003670 0.003838 0.087431 Results were within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent/day.

3.3.3 ILRT Resuls-Total Time Method Percent/Da 1.Leakage Rate Calculated, Lam 2.Upper Confidence Level 3.Type C Corrections (See 3.3.5)4.Total Reported Type A Leakage Rate 0.077245 0.031647 0.003838 0.112730 Results were within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent/day.'.3.4 Superimposed Leakage Verification Test Results 1.The Superimposed Leakage Verification Test is acceptable provided L falls within the following range: (Lam+Lo-0.25 La)+Lc~(Lam+Lo+0.25 La)where: Lam~total measured containment leakage rate from ILRT Lo leakage rate imposed on containment using a flow measuring device (percent/day)

La maximum allowable leakage rate (0.25 percent/day)

Lc=composite leakage rate calculated during the verification test a.Mass Point (See Attachment 3.3G, Page 2 of 3)(.079923+.260691-.062500)(.3340084 (.79923+.260691+.062500).278114 5.334008~.403114 3-6 b.Total Time (See Attachment 3.3G, Page 3 of 3)(.077245+.260691-.062500)~".351351~(.077245

+.260691+.062500).275436~.351351~.400436 The Superimposed Leakage Verification Test met the requirements set forth in References 4 and 5.c.Calculation of Lo, percent/day Lo~740.04 scfh La~709.687 scfh and 0.25 percent/day Lo~(0.25)(740.04)(709.687)Lo.260691 percent/day 3.3.5 Type C Corrections 1.Type C penalty for not venting or draining in standard cubic centimeters per minute.Pen.11 40 ccm Pen.24 a,b,c 1130 ccm Total 1170 ccm 14.696 2.Type C penalty in percent/day (See 3.3.2.3 and 3.3.3.3)La~11.828 scfm and 0.25 percent/day 5142.71 sccm~0.181589 scfm Type C Correction

=0.181589 (scfm)(0.25)=0.003838 11.828 (scfm)Type C Correction

=0.003838 percent/day 3-7 ATTACHMENT 3.3A INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST FROM 1930 HOURS ON MARCH 26, 1986 TO 0500 HOURS ON MARCH 27, REDUCED INPUT VARIABLES 1986 Time~(nr Abs.(Pressure sia Vap.Pressure Temp.Rel.Humidity (ct Mass (ibm 0.000.250.500~750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1;750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3.500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4.5oo 4.75O 5.000 5.250 5.500 5.750 6.000 6.250 6.500 6.750 7.000 7.250 7.500 7.750 8.000 8.250 8.500 8.750 9.000 9.250 9.500 66.042 66.035 66.028 66.022 66.016 66.009 66.003 65.996 65.991 65.985 65.981 65.974 65.969 65.964 65.959 65.954 65.949 65.944 65.939 65.934 65.929 65.925 65.921 65.917 65.913 65.909 65.906 62.902 65.899 65.897 65.893 65.889 65.885 65.881 65.878 65.875 65.871 65.867 65.864.4434.4430.4424.4420.4414.4412.4406.4403.4399 ,4394.4390.4385.4382.4378.4375.4371.4368.4365.4364.4359.4357.4354.4350.4347.4347.4343.4341.4338.4335.4334.4332.4329.4327.4325.4324.4320.4319.4317.4314 545.97 545.92 545.87 545.83 545.78 545.74 545.70 545.66 545.62 545.58 545.54 545.50 545.46 545.43 545.40 545.36 545.33 545.30 545.27 545.24 545.21 545.18 545.15 545.12 545.'10 545.07 545.04 545.02 544.99 544.97 544.94 544.92 544.90 544.88 544.86 544.83 544.81 544.79 544.77 71.443 71.473 71.500 71.529 71.554 71.582 71.591 71.623 71.661 71.675 71.696 71.700 71.740 71.763 71.779 71.808 71.838 71.844 71.881 71.885 71;921 71.946 71.934 71.946 71.983 72.009 72.025 72.029 72.050 72.080 72.091 72.101 72.126 72.143 72.158 72.169 72.181 72.207 72.205 502675.452 502666.990 502662.334 502659.434 502663.749 502645.619 502643.796 502629.178 502629.810 502626.891 502634.785 502618.750 502619.037 502616.859 502609.757 502606.609 502602.508 502591.344 502583.199 502576.761 502567.823 502568.000 502563.359 502563.063 502553.466 502554.105 502554.788 502551.678 502552.697 502561.556 502555.958 502549.281 502538.827 502528.882 502527.112 502532.891 502518.687 502511.669 502506.973 Page lof1 ATTACHMENT 3.3B INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST FROM 1930 HOURS ON MARCH 26, 1986 TO 0500 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, MASS POINT ANALYSIS Time (hr)0.000.250.500~750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1.750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3.500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4.500 4.750 5.000 5.250 5.500 5.750 6.000 6.250 6.500 6.750 7.000 7.250 7.500 7.750 8.000 8.250 8.500 8.750 9.000 9.250 9.500 Mass~(ibm 502675.45 502666.99 502662.33 502659.43 502663.75 502645.62 502643.80 502629.18 502629.81 502626.89 502634.78 502618.75 502619.04 502616.86 502609.76 502606.61 502602.51 502591.34 502583.20 502576.76 502567.82 502568.00 502563.36 502563.06 502553.47 502554.11 502554.79 502551.68 502552.70 502561.56 502555.96 502549.28 502538.83 502528.88 502527.11 502532.89 502518.69 502511.67 502506.97 Leakage~ct~/da)0.000000 0.000000.125269.100667.059132.088280.092963.110431.110416.107427.094061.094510.091485.088158.087183.085933.084926.086470.088666.090755.093340.094135.094680.094209.094664.094109.092819.091538.089740.086607.084166.082401.081565.081415.081062.079902.079738.079817.079923 95 Pct.Conf.ct/da 0.000000 0.000000.179527.050088.061023.050944.034482.031597.023863.018958.020808.017124.014679.012937.011177.009803.008665.007824.007313.006885.006725.006148.005625.005166.004764.004424.004282.004166.004258.005021.005268.005227.004973.004678.004420.004321.004087.003870.003670 UCL~(ct/da)0.000000 0.000000.304796.150755.120154.139223.127445.142027.134279.126385;114869.111635.106165.101095.098360.095737.093592.094294.095979.097640.100065.100282.100305.099375.099429.098533.097101.095704.093997.091629.089434.087628.086538.086092.085482.084224.083825.083687.083594 Page 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT 3.3C INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST FROM 1930 HOURS ON MARCH 26, 1986 TO 0500 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TDK ANALYSIS Time, (hr)Mass (ibm Mean of Meas.Meas.Leakage Leakage Gale.Leakage/~(/)~(/Confidence (ct/da UCL.~(ct/da 0.000.250.500.750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1.750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3-500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4.500 4.750 5.000 5.250 5.500 5.750 502675.45 502666.99 502662.33 502659.43 502663.75 502645.62 502643.80 502629.18 502629.81 502626.89 502634.78 502618.75 502619.04 502616.86 502609.76 502606.61 502602.51 502591.34 502583.20 502576.76 502567.82 502568.00.502563.36 502563.06 0.000000.161613.125268.101972.055876.113949.100762.126248.108959.103047.077666.098445.089784.086077.089617.087650.087067.094488.097879.099200.102774.097719.097307.093321 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.095635.100289.097226.095705 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.099797.060106.078792.082456.096906.098946.098205.089040.089230.086928.084272.083226.082011.080981.081814.083245.084731.086674.087444.088054.087949 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.051600.033316.126159.104960.102131.088976.078919.072446.067064.062196.058161.055002.052260.049919.048474.047441.046501.045852.044700.043585.042378 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000.15139.09342.20495.18741.19903.18792.17712.16148.15629.14912.14243.13822.13427.13090.13028.13068.13123.13252.13214.13163.13032 Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.3C (Continued)

INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST FROM 1930 HOURS ON MARCH 26, 1986 TO 0500 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS Time~(hr Mass (ibm Mean of Meas.Meas.Leakage Leakage Gale.Leakage/~t/)~(/Confidence (ct/da UCL~(ct/da)6.000 6.250 6.500 6.750 7.000 7.250 7.500 7.750 8.000 8.250 8.500 8.750 9.000 9.250 9.500 502553.47 502554.11 502554.79 502551.68 502552.70 502561.56 502555.96 502549.28 502538.83 502528.88 502527.11 502532.89 502518.69 502511.67 502506.97.097070.092699.088632.087549.083727.075006.076069.077729.081539.084823.083323.077789.083163.084538.084673.095472.097225.096020.095390.093366.091749.090464.090467.089662.089426.089295.088731.088518.088397.087930.088465.008270.087526.086737.085539.083352.081559.080179.079414.079122.078703.077732.077437.077323.077245.041417.040364.039333.038374.037487.036841.036131.035402.034712.034130.033552.032955.032464.032042.031647.12988.12863.12685.12511.12302.12019.11769.11558.11412.11325.11225.11068.10990.10936.10889 Page 2 of 2

58Z658 582688 582558 6)l2 M OJ 26 Nar 1S86 TINE-HOURS 2?Mar 1S86 RTTRCHMENT 3.3D MRSS VS.TINE TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT 4 INTEGRRTED LERKRGE RRTE TEST

~~~~LRMMP 0-cC-3 R I-~zi D bJ a+2 u)o K N~cern u~u CC.1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~26 Mar 1986 TIME-HOURS 2?Mar 1S86 RTTRCHMENT 3.3E UCL 8 LRM VS.T IME TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT INTEGRRTED LERKRGE RRTE TEST

~~~~~~RMTT~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~26 Nar 1986 TINE-HOURS 27 Mar 1986 RTTRCHMENT 3.3F UCL 8 LRM VS.T IME TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT INTEGRRTED LERKRGE RRTE TEST

ATTACHMENT 3.3G SUPERIMPOSED LEAKAGE VERIFICATION TEST FROM 0630 TO 1115 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 REDUCED INPUT VARIABLES Time~hr Abs.Pressure sia Vap.Pressure Temp.Rel.Humidity (ct Mass (ibm)0.000.250.500.750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1.750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3.500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4.500 4.750 65.835 65.831 65.826 65.822 65.817 65.812 65.809 65.803 65.798 65.794 65.789 65.785 65.781 65.776 65.772 65.768 65.763 65.759 65.755 65.751.4303.4300.4297.4295.4294.4292.4290.4290.4286.4286.4284.4282.4281.4280.4278.4276.4273.4272.4271.4270 544.64 544.62 544.59 544.57 544.55 544.54 544.52 544.51 544'9 544.47 544.45 544.43 544.42 544.40 544.39 544.37 544.36 544.34 544.33 544.31 72.313 72.314 72.312 72.338, 72.355 72.369 72.371 72.387 72.391 72.421 72.422 72.429 72.430 72.469 72.475 72.492 72.467 72.484 72.510 72.521 502412.458 502403.787 502389.856 502378.923 502358.479 502339.129 502334.462 502298.584 502281.909 502264.392 502244.555 502232.782 502212.780 502193.781 502179.505 502165.831 502143.262 502127.174 502110.399

-502091.440 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 3.3G (Continued)

SUPERIMPOSED LEAKAGE VERIFICATION TEST FROM 0630 TO 1150 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, MASS POINT ANALYSIS Time~(hr 0.000.250.500.750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1.750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3.500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4.500 4.750 Mass~ibm 502412.46 502403.79 502389.86 502378.92 502358.48 502339.13~502334.46 502298.58 502281.91 502264.39 502244.55 502232.78 502212.78 502193.78 502179.50 502165.83 502143.26 502127.17 502110.40 502091.44 Leakage~(ct/d a 0.000000 0.000000.215946.218854.253794.280338'.269337.299436.314760.323649.331016.331186.332970.334950.334682~332885.333579.334092.333808.334008 95 Pct.Conf.~/0.000000 0.000000.248265.038499.050720.044399.032317.040987.035202.029168.024738.020352.017144.014711.012662.011163.009824.008709.007752.006958 UCL~(ct/da 0.000000 0.000000.464210.257353.304513.324737.301654.340422.349963.352818.355754.351538.350113.349661.347345.344048.343403.342800.341561.340966 Page 2 of 3

,~,

ATTACHMENT 3.3G (Continued)

SUPERIMPOSED LEAKAGE VERIFICATION TEST FROM 0630 TO 1115 HOURS ON MARCH 27, 1986 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS Mass (ibm Mean of Meas.Meas.Leakage Leakage Calc.Leakage/~t/~(/Confidence

/UCL~(ct/da)0.000.250.500~750 1.000 1.250 1.500 l.750 2.000 2.250 2.500 2.750 3.000 3.250 3.500 3.750 4.000 4.250 4-500 4.750 502412.46 502403.79 502389.86 502378.92 502358.48 502339.13 502334.46 502298.58 502281.91 502264.39 502244.55 502232.78 502212.78.502193.78 502179.50 502165.83 502143.26 502127.17 502110.40 502091.44 0.000000.165686.215946'213593

.257857.280232.248389.310841.311815.314358.320827.312110.317951.321418.317945.314167.321484.322282.320650.322839 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.222362.254395.280864.276758.302541.318218.328790.337683.340717.344212.347411.348647.348415.349652.350610.350872.351351 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.208078.079509.050156.078880.066412.057829.054584.053037.057072.058509.059273.061187.063604.063849.064010.064453.064473 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000.43044.33390..33101.35563.36895.37604.38337.39072.39778.40272.40668.40983.41201.41350.41462.41532.41582 Page 3 of 3

SECTION 4 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)Section 4 summarizes the LLRT data which has been obtained from periodic testing performed since the Hay 1983 Type A ILRT.Pre-repair data are provided for surveillance testing performed in 1984 and 1986.These LLRT's were performed by pressurizing the listed penetrations with either air or nitrogen and measuring the leakage across the containment isolation valves (Type C)or resilient seals (Type B).Each penetration's leakage rate can be obtained from site reference material.If the pre-repair and post-repair leakages are the same then no repair was performed.

Also, it should be noted that certain penetrations had multiple LLRT's performed as indicated in Attachments 4A and 4B.The acceptance criteria for Types B and C testing are in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J.The combined"as-left" leakage rate for all penetrations and valves subject to Type B and C tests in 1984 and 1986 were well below the acceptance criteria of less than 0.60 La.The data contained in this section are summarized below: Attachment Title 4A 4B 4C 1986 Local Leakage Rate Test Data 1984 Local Leakage Rate Test Data 1986 Local Leakage Rate Test Summary Analysis I 4-1 ATTACHMENT 4A 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.5 PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7 PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested CV-516 (OSC)SV-6385 (OSC).CK-518 (ISC)CK-519 (ISC)CV-519A (OSC)CV-519B (ISC)CV-522A (ISC)CV-522B (ISC)CV>>522C (ISC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)425 425 70,000 540 (25 Combination

~0 Combination Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)(25 C.25 170 540 425 Combination 430 Combination Re air/Notes CK-518-Cleaned and lapped seat.Pen.7-Replaced valve diaphragms.

8 PRZ Steam Samples 9 PRZ Liquid Samples CV-951 (ISC)CV-956A (OSC)CV-953 (ISC)CV-956B (OSC)C30 Combination 450~0 33,500<20 630 Combination 450<30 (30<20 Pen.7-Replaced valve diaphragms.

CV-956A-Cleaned and lapped.CV-953-Cleaned and lapped seat.Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min Post-Repair Leakage/Re air/Notes 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT ll Alternate Low Head SI to Loops 14 Letdown to Nonregenerative C Heat Exchanger 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Removal CV-4658B (OSC)PCV-3-1014 (OSC)CV-4658A (OSC)MOV-872 (OSC)CV-200A (ISC)CV-200B (ISC)CV-200C (ISC)CV-204 (OSC)CK-312C (ISC)HCV-121 (OSC)V-333 (OSC)HV-3-2 (OSC)HV-3-1 (OSC)PAHM-002A (OSC)~30 875 Combination 40<30 Combination 50<30~30 Combination

+30 Combination

<30 875 Combination 40<30 Combination 50 (30<30 Combination

<30 Combination 17 SI Test Line 19A Containment Spray A V-895V (OSC)CK>>890A (OSC)g30 430 8,750 2,800 g30+30 1,400 CK-890A-Inspected valve internals.

CK-890A-Cleaned and lapped seat.Page 2 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.19B Containment Spray B 20 A and B Hot Leg Sample 23.,Containment Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested MOV-880A (OSC)CK-890B (OSC)MOV-880B (OSC)SV-6427A (ISC)SV-6427B (ISC)SV-6428 (OSC)CV-2822 (OSC)CV-2821 (OSC)CK-298A (ISC)CK-298B (ISC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)(30 300 1,500 C30 (30 550 (30 150 400 800 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)(30 300 600 (30 C3O 550 (30 150 400 800 C'30 Repair/Notes CK-890B-Inspected valve internals and cleaned and lapped seat.24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return CK-298C (ISC)MOV-381 (OSC)MOV-6386 (ISC)300~30 1 0600 300 C30 1$000 MOV-6386-Adjusted limit switch.Page 3 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.29 Instrument Air Supply 30 Breathing Air 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return 33 Containment Air Sample 34 Service Air Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested CK-336 (ISC)CK-340A (ISC)CK-201 (ISC)CV-6165 (OSC)CV-4659B (OSC)CV-4659A (OSC)CK-11-003 (ISC)SV-2912 (OSC)PAHM-001A, B (OSC)SV-2913 (OSC)SV-2911 (OS)CK-205 (ISC)V-204 (OSC)HV-17 (OSC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)400 750<30 800+30 Combination 47,500 650 Combination

<30<30 145,000 600 Combination Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)400 750<30 800 C,30 Combination 700 650 Combination

<30 430 600 600 Combination Re air/Notes CK-11-003-Cleaned and lapped seat.CK-205-Cleaned and lapped seat.35 Containment Purge Inlet PV-2600 (OSC)PV-2601 (ISC)23,000 Combination 170,000 Combination 1%500 Combination 1,800 Combination PV-2600, 2601-Adjusted seats.PV-2600, 2601-Adjusted seats.Page 4 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.36 Containment Purge Outlet 37 Spare 38 Electrical Cannisters Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested PV-2602 (OSC)PV-2603 (ISC)Cap 10-879 Cannisters Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min 0'190,000 Combination 150,000 Combination X30<30 350 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min 700 Combination 550 Combination (30 C,30 350 Re air/Notes PV-2603-Adjusted seat.PV-2603-Adjusted seat.Pen.38-The repair value is the total of all electrical penetrations.

39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange B 40 Equipment Access Hatch B 41 Personnel Air Lock 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body ST-CK-945E (ISC)CV-855 (OSC)CK-10-567 (OSC)V-582 (ISC)120 430 4,500 1,600 3,600 600 1705000 Combination 120<30 4,500 1,600 1,900 600 CK-945E-Cleaned and lapped seat.CK-567-Cleaned and lapped seat.Page 5 of 7

ATTAGBKNT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.49 Emergency Air Lock 51 PACVS 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 54A Containment Recir.Sump to RHR Pump A 54B Containment Recir.Sump to RHR Pump B 55 Accumulator Sampling Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested 0-Ring and Body HV-4-3,4 (OSC)PAHM-4-002B (OSC)CV-4668B (OSC)CV-4668A (OSC)MOV-861A (OSC)MOV-860A (OSC)MOV-861B (OSC)MOV-860B (OSC)CV-955C (ISC)CV-955D (ISC)CV-955E (ISC)CV-956D (OSC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min 180,000 Combination 720<30 Combination

<30 Combination

<30 Combination 100 Combination 430 11,000 40 15,500 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min 2,200 Combination 720<30 Combination 30 Combination

<30 Combination 100 Combination

<30 120 40<30 430 Re air/Notes CK-567-Cleaned and lapped seat.CV-955D-Cleaned and lapped seat.CV-956D-Cleaned and lapped seat.CV-956D-Replaced valve internals.

Page 6 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4A (Continued) 1986 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.Ape Test Equipment/Valves Tested Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)Re air/Notes 56 Spare 61A Spare 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out 65B Containment Air Test Pressure Cap V-2027 (OSC)V-2023 (ISC)V-2024 (OSC)CV-2819 (ISC)CV-2826 (OSC)Flange'E'OSC)(ISC)B, C V-2025 (OSC)Flange (ISC)<30 (30 430<30 150 700 1,600 Combination 430 Combination

<30 430 430 K30 150 700 (30 Combination Z30 Combination Pen.65A-Tightened outbd.flange.65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow B, C.V-2026 (OSC)Flange (ISC)-430 g30 Combination Combination Page 7 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4B 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.5 PRT to Gas Analyzer Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested cv-516 (osc)SV-6385 (OSC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)(30<30 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)(30 (30 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7 PM to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8 PRZ Steam Samples 9 PRZ Liquid Samples CK-518 (ISC)CK-519 (ISC)CV-519A (OSC)CV-519B (ISC)CV-522A (ISC)CV-522B (ISC)CV-522C (ISC)CV-951 (ISC)cv-956A (osc)CV-953 (ISC)1,250 3,000 (30 Combination (30 48$000 400 18$000 170 1,400 750 (30 Combination (30 450 240 250 3 5600 170 300 CK-518-Cleaned and lapped seat.CK-519-Cleaned and lapped seat.CV-951-Retest performed after hydro cleaned and lapped seat.CV-956A-Cleaned and lapped seat.Tubing modification on containment boundary.CV-953-Retest performed after hydro.Page 1 of 10 ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT ll Alternate Low Head SI to Loops Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested CV-956B (OSC)CV-4658B (OSC)PCV-3-1014 (OSC)CV-4658A (OSC)MOV-872 (OSC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)50 (30 30,000 Combination

+52,000 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)50~30 (30<20 Combination (30 1,900 Re air/Notes CV-956B-Retest performed after hydro.CV-4658A-Cleaned and lapped seat.MOV-872-Cleaned and lapped seat.MOV-872-Greased valve operator.14 Letdown to Nonregenerative C Heat Exchanger CV-200A (ISC)CV-200B (ISC)CV-200C (ISC)CV-204 (OSC)700 Combination (30 700 Combination

&30 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Removal C CK-312C (ISC)HCV-121 (OSC)V-333 (OSC)HV-3-2 (OSC)HV-3-1 (OSC)PAHM-002A (OSC)(30 220 Combination (30 Combination.

430 220 Combination (30 Combination 17 SI Test Line V-895V (OSC)C30 (30 Page 2 of 10 ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.19A Containment Spray A Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested CK-890A (OSC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)80 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)1i400 Repair/Notes CK-890A-Inspected valve internals.

19B Containment Spray B MOV-880A (OSC)CK-890B (OSC)<30 (30 90 350 MOU-880A-Greased valve operator.CK-890B-Inspected valve internals.

20 A and B Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WET MOV-880B (OSC)SV-6427A (ISC)SV-6427B (ISC)SV-6428 (OSC)CV-2822 (OSC)(30 (30 150 (30)52,000 100 400 430 50 800 MOV-880B-Greased valve operator.SV-6427A-Retest performed after hydro.SV-6427B-Retest performed after hydro.SV-6428-Retest performed after hydro.CV-2822-Cleaned and lapped seat.CV-2821 (OSC)(30<30 Page 3 of 10 0

ATTACHIKNT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.Test Equipment/Valves Tested Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)Re air/Notes 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP CK-298A (ISC)C30 (30 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument Air Supply 30 Breathing Air 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return CK-298B (ISC)CK-298C (ISC)MOV-381 (OSC)MOV-6386 (ISC)CK-336 (ISC)CK-340A (ISC)CK-201 (ISC)CV-6165 (OSC)CV-4659B (OSC)CV-4659A (OSC)CK-11-003 (ISC)SV-2912 (OSC)PAHM-001A, B (OSC)(30 (30 1,150 (30 950 950 (30 430 (30 Combination 40%000 100 Combination (30 (30 1,150<3O 950 950 C30 (30 (30 Combination 1,000 100 Combination CK-11-003-Cleaned and lapped seat.Page 4 of 10

ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.33 Containment Air Sample 34 Service Air 35 Containment Purge Inlet Type Test Equipment/Valves

-Tested SU-2913 (OSC)SV-2911 (OSC)CK-205 (ISC)V-204 (OSC)HV-17 (OSC)PV-2600 (OSC)PV-2601 (ISC)Pre-,Repair Leakage~(cc/min 100 275 11,000 150 Combination

)52,000 Combination Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)100 275 850 430 Combination 3,000 Combination Re air/Notes CK-205-Cleaned and lapped seat.PV-2600&2601-Ad)usted seats.PV-2600&2601-Replaced seals and seats.0 52,000 Combination 9,000 Combination PV-2600&2601-Ad)usted seats.PV-2600&2601-Retest only.13,500 Combination PV-2600&2601-Retest only.Page 5 of 10 0

ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.36 Containment Purge Outlet Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested PV-2602 (OSC)PV-2603 (ISC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min))52,000 Combination 24,000 Combination Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)12%500 Combination 14,200 Combination 127000 Combination 29,000 Combination 10,000 Combination 700 Combination 350 Combination Repair/Notes PV-2600&2601-Retest only.PV-2600&2601-Retest only-.-.-PV-2600&2601-Retest only.PV-2600&2601-Retest only-.PV-2602&2603-Adjusted seats.PV-2602&2603 Retest only.PV-2602&2603-Adjusted seats.PV-2602&2603 Retest only.Page 6 of 10

ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min 200 Combination 19500 Combination 1,400 Combination 500 Combination Re air/Notes PV-2602&2603-Retest only.PV-2602&2603-Retest only.PV-2602&2603-Retest only.PV-2602&2603-Retest only.3,500 Combination PV-2602&2603-Retest only.500 Combination 37 Spare Cap V-10-879 430<30<30 a30 38 Electrical Cannisters Cannisters C,330<330 Penetration 38-Total of all electrical penetrations.

39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange B 0-Ring and Body 450 450 Page 7 of 10

ATTACHMENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.40 Equipment Access Hatch Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested 0-Ring and Body Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min)C,30 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min c30 c,30 430 c,30 30 Re air/Notes 41 Personnel Air Lock 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 0-Ring and Body ST-CK-945E (ESC)5,900 3,500 4,600 3,000 6,800 4,400 5,900 8,700 4,600 3,000 2,500 Personnel Airlock-Repaired reach rods.Personnel Airlock-Repaired reach rods.CK-945E-Cleaned and lapped seat.35,000 4,200 51000 500 CK-945E-Cleaned and lapped seat.CK-945E-Cleaned and lapped seat.CK-945E-Replaced valve.CV-855 (OSC)600 600 400 CV-855-Retest performed after hydro.Page 8 of 10

~'"

ATTAQBKNT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.47 Primary Water Supply Wash Header 49 Emergency Air Lock Type Test-Equipment/Valves Tested CK-10-567 (OSC)V-582 (ISC)O-Ring,and Body Pre-Repair Leakage-~))2%000 Combination 400 750 Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min)240 Combination 400 750 Re air/Notes CK-10-567-Cleaned and lapped seat.51 PACV's 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 54A Containment Recirc.Sump to RHR Pump A C.HV-4-3,4 (OSC)PAHM-4-002B (OSC)CV-4668B (OSC).CV-4668A (OSC)MOV-861A (OSC)MOV-860A (OSC)<30 Combination

<20 Combination

~20 Combination 40 Combination

<30 Combination C20 Combination

~0 Combination 40 Combination CV-4668A&B-Retest performed after hydro.43O (30 Combination Combination MOV-860A&861A-Greased valve operator.54B Containment Recirc.Sump to RHR Pump B 55 Accumulator Sampling MOV-861B (OSC)MOV-860B (OSC)CV-955C (ISC)20200 Combination 130 Combination 50 230 20200 Combination 130 Combination 50<30.MOV-860B&861B-Greased valve operator.CV-955C-Retest performed after hydro.Page 9 of 10 I

ATTAC1KENT 4B (Continued) 1984 LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA Penetration No.61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out Type Test Equipment/Valves Tested CV-955D (ISC)CV-955E (ISC)CV-956D (OSC)V-2023 (ISC)V-2024 (OSC)CV-2819 (ISC)CV-2826 (OSC)Flange iEe (OSC (ISC)Pre-Repair Leakage (cc/min 430 (30<30<30 430+30 430<30 300 950 5,000 Combination Post-Repair Leakage (cc/min 430 430 430<30 (30<30<30 C30 300 950 130 Combination Re air/Notes CV-955D-Retest performed after hydro.CV-955E-Retest performed after hydro.CV-956D-Retest performed after hydro.Pen.65A-Tightened outbd.flange.65B Containment Air Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow B, C V-2025 (OSC)Flange (ISC)B, C V-2026 (OSC)Flange (ISC)g30 Combination C.30 Combination 430 Combination 430 Combination Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT 4C 1986 LLRT

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS The pre-repair LLRT, the repair, and the post-repair LLRT for each boundary, or penetration, was reviewed.The net leakage contribution for each penetration was determined using the following criteria: 1.A leakage equivalent to the repair improvement achieved on each valve in the penetration is calculated.

2.The leakage equivalent is the difference between the pre-repair and the post-repair LLRT results.,3.If a repair was not performed, a zero leakage equivalent is assessed to the valve.4.The leakage equivalent assessed to a penetration may be reduced due to the safety related service of the system associated with the penetration(s).

Justification for this reduction will be provided with the analysis.5.The net equivalent leakage for the penetration is the lowest of the inside or outside valve grouping (e.g., simulates minimum pathway leakage).6.If the"As-Left" leakage of a repaired valve is lower than the"As-Left" leakage of a valve that didn't require a repair, then the penetration net equivalent leakage is the difference between the"As-Left" leakages.7.For series valves tested together, the penetration net equivalent leakage is half the total leakage when both valves are repaired at the same time (prior to performing another test).8.When the summation of the leakage equivalent and the leakage measured during a successful Type A test is greater than 0.75 L the penetration(s) with excessive leakage(s) shall be analyzed under a corrective action program.Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT (Continued) 1986 LLRT SU&fARY ANALYSIS Pen.No.Valve Loc."As-Found""As-Left" Pen.(ccm).(ccm)Net Remarks 5-PRT to Gas Analyzer-Nitrogen to PRT RCP Standpipes CV-516 SV-6385 CK-518 CK-519 OSC OSC ISC ISC Z 25 (25 70,000 540 (25 (25 170 370 540 10 14-PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes

-PRZ Steam Samples-PRZ Liquid Samples-RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT-Alternate Low Head SI to Loops-Letdown to Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger CV-519A,B CV-522A,B,C CV-951 CV-956A CV-953 CV-956B PCV-3-1014 CV-4658A CV-4658B MOV-872 CV200A,B,C CV204 OSC/ISC ISC ISC OSC ISC OSC OSC OSC OSC OSC ISC OSC (25 (30 450 450~30 Z30 33,500 (30 MO<20 875 875~30 430 40 40 WO 430 50 50 0 Combination 0 Combination 0 Combination 15-Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger CK-312C ISC V-333, HCV-121 OSC~30 (30<30&0 Combination

-PACV's, Hydrogen Removal 17-SI Test Line 19A-Containment Spray A 19B-Containment Spray B HV-3-1,2 PAHM-002A V-895V CK-890A MOV-880A CK-890B MOV-880B OSC OSC OSC OSC OSC OSC OSC C30.230 (30~30 (30 1,400 4 30 (30 300 600<30 (30 0 Combination Page 2 of 5 ATTACIBKNT (Continued) 1986 LLRT

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS Pen.No.Valve Loc."As-Found""As-Left" Pen.(ccm)(ccm)Net Remarks 20-A and B Hot Leg Sample 23-Containment Sump to WHT 24A,B,C,-RCP Seal Inject.SV-6427A SV-6427B SV-6428 CV-2821 CV-2822 CK-298A CK-298B CK-298C ISC ISC OSC OSC OSC ISC ISC ISC (30 (30 550 550<-30 (30 400 400 150 150 800 800 (30 (30 300 300 25-RCP Seal Water Return 29-Instrument Air Supply 31-RCDT to Gas Analyzer MOV-6386 MOV-381 ST-CK-340A CK-336 CK-201 CV-6165 CV-4659A,B ISC OSC ISC ISC ISC OSC OSC 1,600 1,000~30 (30 750 750 400 400 (30<30 800 800%0 (30 0 Combination 32-Containment Air Sample Return CK-11-003 ISC SV-2912, OSC PAHM-001A,B OSC 47,500 650 700 650 Combination 33-Containment Air Sample SV-2911 SV-2913 OSC OSC<30 (30<30<SO CK-205 ISC HV-17, V-204 OSC 145,000 600.600 600 Combination 35-Containment Purge Inlet 36-Containment Purge Outlet PV-2601 PV-2600 PV-2603 PV-2602 ISC OSC ISC OSC 23,000 1,800 0190,000 550 10,600 See Note 1 Combination 0 See Note 2, Only re-worked PV-2603.Combination Page 3 of 5

.i ATTACHMENT (Continued)

N 1986 LLRT

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS Pen.No.Valve Loc~"As-Found""As-Left" Pen.(ccm)(ccm)Net Remarks 37-Spare 38-Electrical Cannisters 39-Fuel Transfer Tube Flange CAP 10-879 (30 (30 (30<30 350 350 120 120 0 40-Equipment Hatch 30 30 41-Personnel Air Lock 4,500 4,500 42-Nitrogen to Accumulators ST-CK-945E CV-855 ISC OSC 1,600 600 15900 600 t 47-Primary Water Supply to Wash Header CK-10-567 V-582 OSC ISC 170,000 2,200 0 Only re-worked CK-10-567'ombination 49-Emergency Air Lock 51-PACV's Annulus HV-4-3, HV-4-4 OSC PAHM-4-002B OSC 720 720~30~30 0 Combination 52-RCDT Pump Discharge CV-4668A,B OSC<'3O (30 0 Combination t 54A-Cont.Recirc.Sump MOV-860A to RHR Pump A MOV-861A OSC MO (30 0 Combination 54B-Cont.Recirc.Sump to RHR Pump B MOV-860B MOV-861B OSC 100 100 0 Combination 55-Accumulator Sampling CV-955C CV-955D CV-955E CV-956D ISC ISC ISC OSC<30 430 11,000 120 10,880 40 40 15,500~0 Page 4 of 5

<4~~I rj~~

ATTACHMENT

'(Continued) 1986 LLRT

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS Pen.No.56-Spare 61A-Spare t 61B-Deadweight Tester to PT Valve V-2027 V-2023 V-2024 Loc.OSC ISC OSC 30"As-Found""As-Left" Pen.30 30~0 q(30 0 30 0 30 63-Instrument Air Bleed CV-2819 CV-2826 ISC OSC 150 700 150 0 700 65A-Containment Air Flange Test Air In-Out 65B-Containment Air V-2025 Test Pressure Flange OSC ISC OSC ISC 1,600 30 30 0 Only outbd.,',flange repaired.30 0 Combination 65C-Containment Air V-2026 Test Pressure Flange OSC ISC 30 30 0 Combination NOTES: 1.Since both valves were reworked at the same time, one-half of the total leakage (As-Found minus As-Left)is conservatively assigned to this penetration.

If piece-wise maintenance had been performed; as was done on Penetration 36, a smaller net equivalent leakage~mi ht have resulted.2.Greater than represents the largest flowmeter used for the 1986 LLRT program.See Penetration 36.CONCLUSION The net equivalent leakage is 21,850 ccm, or 0.071860 percent/day.

Page 5 of 5

(~i 0', 0