ML17340A940

Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test Type A,B & C Surveillance Test

ML17340A940
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	01/31/1981
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17340A939	List: L-81-148, Forwards, Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test Type A,B & C Surveillance Test ML17340A940
References
NUDOCS 8104090483
Download: ML17340A940 (99)

Text

REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST TYPE Ag B~

AND C SURVEILLANCE TEST FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NO.

4 JANUARY 1981 a ju~N@mmm ts> Oooo o)Qg

)

1

REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST TYPE Ag B~

AND C SURVEILLANCE TEST FLORIDA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NO.

4 JANUARY 1981

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section REFERENCES.

Title

~Pa e

1

PURPOSE, 2

SUMMARY

e

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

2.1 TYPE A TEST.

~

~

~

2-1 2"1 2.2 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C).

3 TYPE A TEST.

~

2 3 3-1 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS

~ 3-1 3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION

~

3 2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 Prerequisites.

Equipment and Instrumentation.

Data Acquisition System.

Data Resolution System 3-2 3 2 3-2 3-3 3.3 TEST ANALYSIS.

~

~

~

3-5 3.4 TEST RESULTS

~

~

~

3 7

3.4.1 CILRT Results

- Mass Point Method.

3.4.2 CILRT Results

- Total Time Method.

3.4.3 Imposed Leakage Rate Results

~Aendix 3A SITE METEOROLOGY PRIOR TO CILTR 3B SITE METEOROLOGY DURING THE CILRT.

3C INSTRUMENTATION TABLE 3D INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION (PROFILE VIEW) 3E CONTAINMENT INPUT VARIABLES

~

3 7

3 "7

~

3 7

3B-1 3D-1 3F LEAK RATE DATA - ABSOLUTE METHOD.

3G LEAK RATE DATE " TOTAL TIME 3H STABILIZATION, CI?RT AND VRRIFICATION, CONTAINMENT AIR MASS VERSUS TIME (HOURLY DATA) 3F-1 3G-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont) 3J CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE AND UCL VERSUS TIME 3J"1 3K CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE (TOTAL TIME) VS TIME.

3K-1 Section 4

LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C).

~Aced ix 4A 1980 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

1979 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

1978 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

1977 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

4-1 4A-1 4A-1 4A-1 4A-2 4B 1980 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1979 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1978 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1977 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

~

4B-1 4B-5 4B-9 4B-13

'L k

REFERENCES 10CFRSO Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water cooled Power Reactors, April 19, 1976 Florida Power Ec Light Turkey Point Plant OP13100.2 Integrated Leak Rate Test Unit 4 ANS

N274, Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements, Draft 3, July 1979

V

SECTION 1

PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a description of the Type A Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT) and an analyses of the Types B,

and C testing activities since the last CILRT conducted on the Florida Power and Light Turkey Point. Plant Unit No. 4; This report.

is 'ubmitted as requir'ed by 10CFRSO Appendix J, paragraph V.B. (Reference 1)

I' 0

SECTION 2

SUMMARY

2.1 TYPE A TEST Pressurization for the CILRT was initiated at approximately 0600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> on 30 December.

1980.

At approximately 0924

hours, pressurization was stopped at a

pressure of approximately 25

psia, so a

preliminary inspection could be made of all penetration areas.

There was no significant leakage noted at

-this time.and no corrective action was considered necessary.

Pressurization continued at approximately 1146 hours0.0133 days <br />0.318 hours <br />0.00189 weeks <br />4.36053e-4 months <br />.

Test pressure was reached at approximately 2105 hours0.0244 days <br />0.585 hours <br />0.00348 weeks <br />8.009525e-4 months <br /> and containment pressurization was secured.

Containment temperature stabilization criterion was met at approximately 0520 hours0.00602 days <br />0.144 hours <br />8.597884e-4 weeks <br />1.9786e-4 months <br /> on 31 December 1980.

The extended time period required for stabilization was apparently due to insufficient air circulation in the containment.

Sensor data were continually recorded at 20 minute intervals.

Calculated mass trends from 0520 hours0.00602 days <br />0.144 hours <br />8.597884e-4 weeks <br />1.9786e-4 months <br /> to approximately 1120 hours0.013 days <br />0.311 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.2616e-4 months <br /> indicated an acceptable leak rate of approximately 35 percent of La.

From 1120 hours0.013 days <br />0.311 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.2616e-4 months <br /> to approximately 1600

hours, the mass trends indicated an unacceptable leak rate of approximately La.

A detailed inspection was initiated at

'pproximately 1300 hours0.015 days <br />0.361 hours <br />0.00215 weeks <br />4.9465e-4 months <br /> to identify major leak paths.

At approximately 1600

hours, the reactor coolant drain tank (RCDT) "A" loop pump discharge isolation valve (CV-4668A) was observed to be leaking through the valve body.

It was also observed that the valve was in the open position, although the valve does receive a containment isolation signal to close.

A review of the valve line-up revealed that, an error had been made in an attachment to the test procedure (Reference 2).

The attachment showed the valve in the open position.

The attachment to the procedure was amended to reflect the proper position of the valve.

At approximately 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> on 31 December

1980, the valve was placed in its proper position.

From 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> 31 December 1980 to approximately 0800 hours0.00926 days <br />0.222 hours <br />0.00132 weeks <br />3.044e-4 months <br /> on 1

January

1981, the calculated leak rate was acceptable and the requirements of the procedure were satisfied.

At 0900 hours0.0104 days <br />0.25 hours <br />0.00149 weeks <br />3.4245e-4 months <br /> on 1 January 1981, the superimposed leak rate test commenced.

At 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br /> the calculated containment leak rate satisfied the requirements of the procedure.

Depressurization of the containment at approximately 5.5 psi/hr commenced at 1852 hours0.0214 days <br />0.514 hours <br />0.00306 weeks <br />7.04686e-4 months <br /> on 1 January 1981.

1 2-1

I

'I P

W r

e

'h I

~ I

During depressurization, the RCDT pump isolation valve was tested in the closed position and a leak rate of 20 cc/min was measured.

The bonnet of the valve was removed and it was noted that the diaphragm had failed.

The diaphragm was replaced and the valve retested.

The measured leak rare was 0 c'c/min.

2~2

I I

T

2.2 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)

The local leak rate testing of containment isolation valves and primary containment, penetrations was conducted as required by station procedures, since the last Type A Test.

The penetrations tested and their associated leak rates are listed in Section 4 of this report.

2-3

SECTION 3 TYPE A TEST 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS 30 December 1980 0600 - initiated containment pressurization 0924 - stopped pressurization for preliminary leakage

. inspection 1146 restarted containment pressurization 2105 - secured containment pressurization 31 December 1980 0520 - completed stabilization 1300 - increased containment leakage rate noted 1620 - closed RCDT pump isolation valve 1 January 1981 0800 - leak rate test terminated 0900 - started superimposed leak rate test 1400 - completed superimposed leak rate test 1852 - commenced blowdown of containment

4 0

3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION 3.2.1 Prerequistes In accordance with the test procedure (Reference 2),

the following is a partial listing of the prerequisites that were completed and documented prior to containment pressurization.

1.

General inspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment structure inspected.

2.

All equipment and instrumentation that could be damaged or destroyed by test pressure removed or protected.

3.

All instrumentation used for test calibrated or functionally verified.

4.

Valve line-ups, as

required, completed, including closure of the containment isolation valves.

5.

Appropriate computer systems programmed and available for data input into the time share computer.

6.

The Official Log of Events book established and available prior to commencement of the test.

7.

Site meterological data taken for seven days prior to and throughout the performance of the CILRT.

3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation Instrumentation and valving were installed to maintain proper monitoring and control during pressurization.

Pressurization of the containment was achieved by utilization of eight air compressors.

Air was piped through aftercoolers and refrigerated air dryers.

The total capacity of the pressurization system as installed was rated at approximately 7,000 scfm.

During the

test, the necessary variables used to determine containment leakage were continually monitored using instrumentation which consisted of resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), relative humidity detectors (RHD) and absolute pressure quartz manometers (see Appendix 3D).

A rotometer was used during the superimposed leak rate test.

3.2.3 Data Acquisition System The Turkey Point Plant Unit No.

4 CILRT utilized a portable programmable calculator and a time share computer to average and analyze the test data.

3-2

I y

,h K

CILRT sensor data were recorded at 20 minute intervals during the test.

Neighted average temperature, weighted relative

humidity, absolute

pressure, vapor

pressure, and mass values were periodically calculated for each interval using the portable programmable calculator.

3.2.4 Data Resolution System After the appropriate data had been acquired and averaged, the results were manually input into FPEcL's computer system for UCL and leak rate calculations.

3.2.4.1 Absolute Method Mass Point Analysis The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis consists of calculating air masses within the containment structure over a

period of time from

pressure, temperature, and dew point observations during the CILRT.

The air masses are computed using the ideal gas law as follows:

RT (Eq 1) where:

M P

Pv

R T

V air mass, lb total pressure, psia average vapor pressure, psia 53.35 ft lbf/ibm R (for air) average containment temperature OR containment free volume, 1.55 x 10't~

The air mass is correlated and the result is correlated as a

function of time by means of a least-squares fit of the form:

m=At+ B (Eq 2)

The slope A and the y intercept B are then used in Equation 3 to determine the leak rate.

The leakage rate is then determined by plotting the air mass as a

function of time, using a

least-squares fit to determine the

slope, A = dM/dt.

The leak rate is expressed as a percentage of air mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

B (Eq 3) where A is the slope of the least-squares curve and B is the y intercept.

The sign convention is such that an outward leak is positive and the units are in percent/day.

3-3

A 95 percent, confidence interval is calculated using a 'students' distribution.

The sum of the leakage rate and the 95 percent. confidence interval "is the UCL.

The leak rate is less than the UCL with a probability of 95 percent.

3.2.4.2 Absolute Method Total Time Analysis The absolute method of total time analysis consists of calculating air lost from the containment using

pressure, temperature, and dew point observations during the CILRT.

The containment air mass is computed using Equation 1

(Section 3.2.4.1).

The measured leakage rate at any time (t) is then determined by subtracting the mass at that time (Mt) from the initial mass (Mi) and dividing by the initial mass.

The measured leak rate is expressed as a percentage of containment mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

Measured Leak Rate

= Mi - Mt (2400)

Mih( t)

The sign convention is such that an outward leak is positive and the units are in percent/day.

The calculated leakage rate is then determined by plotting the measured leak rate as a function of time and then performing a

least-squares fi't of the measured leak rate values as follows:

Calculated Leak Rate

= At +

B Where A is the slope and B is the Y intercept of the least-squares curve.

The 95 percent confidence interval is determined with the

'students' distribution.

This analysis method was used in conjunction with the procedure.

3-4

3.3 TEST ANALYSIS Test data acquired from the start of stabilization to the termination of the supplemental leak test are shown as a graph in Appendix 3H.

The graph is divided into the following zones:

Zone A

depicts temperature stabilization period from 2105 hours0.0244 days <br />0.585 hours <br />0.00348 weeks <br />8.009525e-4 months <br /> 30 December 1980 to 0520 hours0.00602 days <br />0.144 hours <br />8.597884e-4 weeks <br />1.9786e-4 months <br /> 31 December 1980 Zone B

depicts acceptable mass trend from 0520 to 1300 hours0.015 days <br />0.361 hours <br />0.00215 weeks <br />4.9465e-4 months <br /> 31 December 1980 Zone C

depicts increasing mass trend from 1300 to 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> 31 December 1980 Zone D

depicts acceptable mass trend from 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> 31 December 1980 to 0800 hours0.00926 days <br />0.222 hours <br />0.00132 weeks <br />3.044e-4 months <br /> 1 January 1981.

This zone contains the data used for leakage rate calculations Zone E

depicts superimposed leak rate test from 0900 hours0.0104 days <br />0.25 hours <br />0.00149 weeks <br />3.4245e-4 months <br /> 1 January 1981 to 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br /> 1 January 1981 It is apparent that the cause of the increased mass trend as shown in Zone C was a result of the failure of the RCDT pump isolation valve.

The subsequent closing of the valve resulted in the acceptable mass trend as shown in Zone D.

The slope of the mass trend shown in Zone D is similar to that slope in Zone B before the RCDT pump isolation valve diaphragm failed.

The leakage rate analysis was performed by using FPGL's CILRT program (Section 3.2.4).

The reduced data are shown in Appendix 3E.

The absolute method mass point analysis (Section 3.4.1) represents the results of the containment leakage rate.

The

results, shown in Appendix 3F, show the UCI to be 0.0367 percent/day which is within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent/day (0.75 La).

The Absolute Method Total Time Analysis (Section 3.4.2) is used in conjunction with the Instrument Selection Guide (Reference 3) to determine the duration of the CILRT if less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

The data used in Zone D satisfy the requirements of the test procedure.

The results of the total time analysis are tabulated in Appendix 3G.

The results show the UCL to be 0.1299 percent/day which is within the acceptable limit of 0.25 percent/day (La).

3-5

The following appendixes summarize the plots provided by this report:

~Aendix Dee~cri'icn 3H Containment air mass vs time (2120 hours0.0245 days <br />0.589 hours <br />0.00351 weeks <br />8.0666e-4 months <br /> on 12/30/80 to 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br /> on 1/1/81) 3J Containment leak rate and UCL vs time, mass point analysis (1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> on 12/31/81 to 0800 hours0.00926 days <br />0.222 hours <br />0.00132 weeks <br />3.044e-4 months <br /> on 1/1/81 3K Calculated containment leak rate vs time, total time analysis (1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> on 12/31/81 to 0800 hours0.00926 days <br />0.222 hours <br />0.00132 weeks <br />3.044e-4 months <br /> on 1/1/81)

The leakage rate test calculations were verified by the

. superimposed leak method.

The test ran from 0900 to

~ 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br /> on January 1,

1981.

The containment leakage rate calculated during the verification test satisfied the procedure.

3-6

~ 't ll

3.4 TEST RESULTS 3.4.1 2.

3.

CILRT Results - Mass Point Method Leakage rate calculated, Lam 95 percent upper confidence

UCL, Lam leakage rate with 95 percent confidence interval (1+2) 0 '32450 percent/day 0.004231 percent/day 0 '36681 percent/day 3.4.2 CILRT Results - Total Time Method l.

2.

3.

Leakage rate calculated, Lam 95 percent upper confidence

UCL, Lam leakage rate with 95 percent confidence interval (1+2) 0.047204 percent/day 0.082689 percent/day 0.129893 percent/day 3.4.3 Imposed Leakage Rate Test Results The Imposed Leak Rate Test is acceptable if Lc falls

'ithin the following range:

(Lo+Lam - 0.25 La)

< Lc< (Lo+Lam

+ 0.25 La) where:

Lc = containment leakage rate calculated during the verification'est (0.1108%/day).

Lo = leakage rate imposed on containment using flow measuring device (0.1103%/day)

La = Maximum allowable leakage rate for ILRT (0.25%/day)

Lam = total measured containment leakage rate (0.0472%/day)

(0.1108

+ 0.0472 - 0.0625)

< 0.110%

(0.1108

+ 0.0472

+ 0.0625)

II 0.0950

< 0.1108

< 0 '200 2

~

The Imposed Leakage Rate Test met the requirements set forth in Reference 3.

3-7

APPENDIX 3A SITE METEOROLOGY PRIOR TO CILRT Date 12/23/80 12/24/80 12/25/80 12/26/80 12/27/80 12/28/80 12/29/80 Time 0400 0800 1200

.1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800 Barometric Pressure

30. 21

30. 27 30'5 30.20 30.23 30.21 30.18 30.21 30.20 30.15 30.16 30.15

30. 13 30.16 30.18

30. 15

30. 21 30.18 30.21 30.22 30.18 30'0 30.10 30.10 30.07 30.12 30.12 30.05 30.05 30.08

30. 04

30. 05 30.10 30.05 30.09 30.05

30. 03 30.08 Dry Bulb Temperature 69.0 71.0 76.0 70.0 68.0 65.0 65.0 61.0 67.0 71.0 68.0

64. 0

62. 0 61.0 65.0

64. 0 55 '

49.0 45.0 47.0 70.0

68. 0 61.0 60.0

54. 0 53.0 67.0 63.0 55.0 50.0

45. 0

43. 0 S4. 0 58.0 50.0 48.0 50.0 49.0 Wand Direction 120 120 130 60 360 350 350 315 10 350 350 355 320 270 310 340 330 320 320 330 340 45 350 10 300 310 300 320 300 340 320 320 300 290 360 60 240 320 Wind Velocity

~Nh 18 16 19 8

18 14 15 14 14 8

8 16 8

12 20 24 18 16 14 6

12 10 15 10 20 15 15 20 20 20 20 18 12 15 10 2

6 13

Appendix 3A (Cont)

Date Time Barometric Pressure Dry Bulb Wind Temperature Wind Velocity 1200

30. 10 1600 30.04 2000 30.12 2400 30.08 12/30/80 0400 30.08 65.0 64.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 190 310 270 300 340 12 12 12 14 15 3A-2

1

APPENDIX 3B SITE METEOROLOGY DURING THE CIIRT Date 12/30/80 12/31/80 1/1/81 Time 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 0000 Barometric Pressure 30'9 30.10 30.12 30.14

30. 13

30. 14

30. 13 30'. 09 30.07 30.06 30.06 30.07 30.07 30'7 30.09 30.08 30.08 30.06

30. 06 30.06 30.05 30.07 30.07 30.05 30.09 30.12 30.13 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 30.11 30.11 30.12 30.13 30.16 30'8 30.16 30.19 30.20 Dry Bulb Temperature 50 '

55.0 56.0 58.0 67.0 64.5 67.0 68.0 65.0 64.0 67.0 65.0

63. 0 62

~ 0

58. 0 58.0 60.0 59.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 52.0 50.0 49.0 50.0 56.0 57.5 59.0 63.0 63.0 64.0 65.0 63.0 62.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 49.0 Wind Direction 320 N/A 120 120 150 170 290 220 280 260 260 260 230 230 240 240 260 300 340 340 320 320 330 320 310 310 300 300 310 310 312 320 300 300 330 270 270 280 310 310 Wind Velocity

~Mh 12 4

12 14 8

12 10 18 20 12 12 14 14 14 19 20 20 23 16 16 16 16 19 20 16 12 11 12 8

8 5

7 8

4 7

16 17 18

it

Date Time Appendix 3B (Cont)

Barometric Dry Bulb Pressure Temperature Wind Wind Velocity Direction

~M h 0100

30. 20 0200 30'9 0300 30.18 0400 30.19 0500 30.18 0600 30.21 0700 30'2 0800 30.24 0900 30'6 1000 30.27 1100 30.27 1200 30.21 1300 30.20 1400 30.18 1500 30.18 1600 30'6 1700 30.19 1800 30.20 48.0 48.0 47.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 46.0 51.0 58.0 58.0 62.0 60.0 62.0 72.0 71.0 70.0 63.0 60.0 320 310 305 320 325 330 310 340 340 330 360 30 30 270 270 280 170 170 19 18 17 18 16 10 12 15 12 6

8 6

8 10 10 4

14 12 3B-2

0 c

APPENDIX 3C INSTRUMENTATION TABLE The following instruments were calibrated or functionally verified no greater than 6 months prior to the performance of this test and in accordance with 10CFRSO, Appendix J, and Field Calibration Procedures using instrumentation traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

Instrument RTD-1 RTD-2 RTD-3 RTD-4 RTD-5 RTD-6 RTD-7 RTD-8 RTD-9 RTD-10 RTD-11 RTD-12 RTD-13 RTD-14 RTD-15 RTD-16 RTD-17 RTD-18 RTD-19 RTD-20 RTD-21 Wei ht Factor 0.181 0.32 0.024 Not Used 0.024 Not Used 0.024 0.024 0.0198 0.0198 0.0198 0.0198 0.0198 0.0198 0.0198 Not Used 0.0198 0.0198 Not Used 0.0198

0. 024

~Accurac

+O.S'F

+O.S F

+O.S'F

+0.5'F

+0 5 F

+O.S'F

+05 F

+0.5'F

+O.S'F

+05 F

+O.S F

+05 F

+O.S'F

+OSF

+05F 20 SOF

+05 F

Instrument APPENDIX 3C (CONT)

Wei ht Factor A~ccurac RTD-22 RHD-1 RHD<<2 RHD-3 RHD-4 RHD-6 RDH-8 RDH-9 RHD-10

0. 181

0. 160 not used 0.482 0.160 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495

+05F

+03C

+03C

+03C

+03C

+0. 3~C i0.3 C

+03C TI-145 Quartz Manometer 1

TI-145 Quartz Manometer 2

N/A N/A 0-100 psia 0-100 psia Flowmeter 28 scfm at, 50 psig 3C-2

~ <

~

1

RHD-I RHD-4 RHD 2 EL I4000 RHD-3 EL 80 00 EL 6300 RHD-8 EL 36 00 RHD-9 RHD-6 EL 20 00 RHD-IO PROFILE VIFW NOTE:

I. RHD-2 NOT USED APPENDIX 3D INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RELATIVE HUMIDITYDETECTORS(RHD)

TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST 3D"I

0

~ ~

%e i

RTD-2.

RTD" I RT D-5 RTD"4 RTD "3 RTD-10 RTD-I I RTO-12 RTD-9 RTD-13 RT D-14 EL 140 00 EL 80 00 EL 63 00 EL 36 00 EL 20 00 RTD-22 RTD-6 RTD-7 RTD-8 RTD" 19 RTD-17 RTD-15 RTD-20 RTD-IS RTD-16 PROFILE V IEW NOTE:

I, RTD-4, 16 AND 19 NOT USED APPENDIX 3D INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION R ES ISTANCE TEMPEfQllJRE DETECTORS(RTD)

TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST 3D" 2

yf t

i

'h f

~,

'P

~ P

~

I a

e

APPENDIX 3E FPBcL TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST FROM 1620 HOURS ON 12/31/80 TO 0800 HOURS ON 1/1/81 Time

~Hours 0.000 0.333 0.667 1 ~ 000 1.333

1. 667 2.000 2.333 2.667 3.000 3.333 3.667 4.000 4.333 4.667 5.000 5.333 5.667 6.000 6.333 6.667 Abs Pressure Psia 67.942 67.938 67.935 67.932 67.929 67.925 67.923

67. 919

67. 915

67. 913

67. 910 67.907 67.904 67.901 67.898 67.895 67.891 67.889 67.886 67.883 67.879 Rel Humidity

~P'6.744 76.768 76.805 76.832 76.861 76.903 76.906 76.944 76.968 77.010 77.042 77.084

77. 120

77. 160

77. 152 77.221 77.281 77.275 77.275 77.278 77.289 Vap Press

~rs ls 0.3856 0.3853 0.3850 0.3851 0.3849 0.3849 0.3849 0.3847 0.3848 0.3849 0.3849 0.3847 0.3843 0.3844 0.3839 0.3839 0.3839 0.3835 0.3834 0.3832 0.3831 Dry Bulb Tem era ure 539.40 539.36 539.33 539.32 539.29 539.26 539.27 539.25 539.24 539.23 539.22 539. 19 539. 14 539. 17 539. 10 539.07 539.05 539.02 539.01 539.00 538.98 "R

Mass

~Ibm 523978.3862 523987.9376 523998.9060 523981.8564 523986. 1885 523971. 1748 523961.2429 523954.3788 523930.0180 523920.7972 523912.8436 523919.8039 523941. 3212 523924.6400 523939. 6182 523946.5153 523934.9075 523951.4822 523940.3169 523930.4792 523917. 1398

C l

E P

8 1

k I

r>

I 1

r 1

J A1

~

~

C

'0

APPENDIX 3E (CONT)

Time

~Hours 7.000 7.333 7.667 8.000 8.333 8.667 9.000 9.333 9.667 10.000 10.333 10.667

11. 000

11. 333

11. 667 12.000 12.333 12.667 13.000 13.333 13.667 14.000 14.333 Abs Pressure Psia 67.875 67.872 67.869 67.866 67.863 67.859 67.855 67.852 67.849 67.846 67.842 67.838 67.835 67.826 67.829 67.826 67.824 67.821

67. 818

67. 815

67. 813

67. 810 67.808 Rel Humidity

~s 77.338 77.351 77.335 77.355 77.364

77. 199 77.370 77.387 77.362 77.357 77.343 77.309 77.328 77.307 77.252 77.224 77.212

77. 165

77. 171 77.143

77. 113

77. 144

77. 161 Vap Press

~oslo 0.3829 0.3827 0.3825 0.3822

0. 3819 0.3809

0. 3811

0. 3813

0. 3810 0.3805 0.3801 0.3798 0.3794 0.3784 0.3789 0.3784 0.3780 0.3774 0.3771 0.3770 0.3765 0.3767 0.3766 Dry Bulb Tem era ure 538.94 538.92 538.92 538.89 538.86 538.84 538.79 538.80 538.78 538.75 538.73 538.72 538.68 538.66 538.66 538.63 538.61 538.57 538.55 538.55 538.53 538.52 538.52 R

Mass

~los 523921.8974 523921. 4147 523905. 1664 523913.8941 523919.9586 523911.3762 523928.6897 523897.9574 523891.9441 523904.6628 523901.3968 523880.7412 523889.2432 523889.9409 523874. 1923 523883.2692 523894.3491 523907.6057 523907.4625 523884.3588 523889.8624 523867.8800 523861.3200 3E-2

I 4

)

C f

1

.0 J

APPENOIX 3E (CONT)

Time

~Hours Abs Pressure Psia Rel Humidity JPP Yap Press

~osis Ory Bulb Tem erature R

Mass

~luu 14.667 15.000 15.333 15.667 67.805 67.802 67.799 67.797

77. 133 77.089 77.086 77.039 0.3761 0.3757 0.3754 0.3752 538'8 538.47 538.45 538.44 523871. 5800 523864.5923 523868.0273 523855.8481 3E-3

APPENDIX 3F FPScL TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 4 1NTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST FROM 1620 HOURS ON 12/31/80 TO 0800 HOURS ON 1/1/81 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, MASS POINT ANALYSIS Time

~Hours 0.333 0 '67 1.00 1.333 1.667 2.000 2.333 2.667 3.000 3.333 3.667 4.000 4.333 4 '67 5.000 5.333 5.667 6.000 6.333 6.667 Mass

~Lbm Leakage

~Pct Da

)

Conf Pct a

523978.39 0.00 523987.94 0.00.

0.000000 0.000000 523998. 91

-0. 140916

0. 039323 UCL Pct a

0.00 0.00

-0.101593 523986.19

-0.013104 0.091465 523971.17 0.022907 0.047927 0.062221 523961.24 523954.38 523930.02 0 '87057 523920.80 0.101862 523912.84 0.110279 523919.80 0.107208 523941.32 0.092076 523924.64 0.086485 523939 '2 0.075537 523946.52 0.064459 523934.91 0.058721 523951.48 0.049665 523940.32 0.044823 523930.48 0.42S86 523917.14 0.0427S7 0.089013 0.069319 0.053301 0.052334 0.0452S5 0.037900 t0.031322 0.032455 0.028403 0.027951 0 '7875 0.025432 0.025059 0 '023074 0.020852 0.018827 0.104569 0.111920 0 '17246 0.115522 0.139391 0.147117 0.148179 0.138530 0.124531 0.114888 0.103488 0 '92334 0.084153 0.074724 0.067897 0.063438 0.061584 523981.86

-0.029395

-0.189510 0.218905

lg I

4

APPENDlX 3F (CONT)

Time Mass

~Hours

~Lbm Leakage Pct a

Conf Pct Da UCL Pct a

7.000 7 '33 7 '67 8.000 8.333 8.667 9.000 9.333 9.667 10.000 10.333 10.667 11.000 11.333 11.667 12.000 12.333 12.667 13.000 13.333 13.667 14.000 14.333 r

14.667 523921. 90

0. 041604 523921. 41

0. 040346 523905.17 0.041206 523913.89 0.040389 523919.96 0.038689 523911.38 0.037969 523928.69 0.035354 523897.96 0.035912 523891.94 0.03667 523904.66 0.036007 523901.40 0.035513 523880.74 0.036431 523899.24 0.035732 523889,94 0.035584 523874.19 0.036273 523883.27 0.036170 523894.35 0.035320 523907.61 0.033757 523907.46 0.032301 523884.36 0.032042 523889.86 0.031460 523867.88 0.031814 523861.32 0.032298 523871.58 0.032218 3F-2 0.017078 0.015617 0.014311 0.013167 0.012294 0.011389 0.011001 0.010245 0.009584 0.008987 0.008433 0.007985 0.007550 0.007112 0.006758 0.058682 0.055963 0.055517 0.053556 0.050983 0.049358 0.046355 0.046157 0.046254 0.044994 0.043946 0.044416 0.043282 0.042696 0.043031 0.006126 0.006087 0.006023 0.005732 0.005496 0.005273 0.005042 0.004816 0.041446 0.039844 0.038324 0.037774 0.036956 0.037067 0.037340 0.037034 0.006387 '.042557

Time

~Hours Mass

~Lbm APPENDIX 3F (CONT)

Leakage Conf Ml UCL Pct a

15.000 15.333 15.667 523864. 59

0. 032326

0. 004604

0. 036930 523868.03 0.032208 0.004408 0 '36616 S238S5.84 0.032450 0.004231 0.036681 Initial estimated mass

= 523973.17 Final estimated mass

= 523862.18 3F-3

APPENDIX 3G FP&L TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST FROM 1620 HOURS ON 12/31/80 TO 0800 HOURS ON 1/1/81 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS Time

~Hours 0.000 0.333 0.667

1. 000 1

~ 333 1.667 2.000 2.333 2.667 3.000 3.333 3.667 4.000 4.333 4.667 5.000 5.333 5.667 6.000 6'33 6.667 Mass

~Lbm 523978.39 523987.94 523998.91 523981.86 523986. 19 523971. 17 523961 '4 523954.38 523930.02 523980.80 523912.84 523919.80 523941.32 523924.64 523939.62 523946.52 523934.91 523951.48 523940.32 523930.48 523917. 14 Meas Leakage Pcs Da 0.000000

-0. 131377

-0. 140911

-0.015895 "0.026810

0. 019814 0.039261 0.047133 0.083068 0.087926 0.090071

0. 073173 0.042443 0.056814 0.038048 0.029196 0.037342 0.021745 0.029062 0.034649 0.042077 Mean of Meas Leaka e

0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

-0.096061

-0.078748

-0.059036

-0.042653

-0.029826

-0. 015714

-0.004199 0.005228 0.011405

0. 013991

0. 017286 0 ~ 018769

0. 019464 0.020581 0.020650 0.021117

0. 021829 0.022842 Ca ic Leakage

~Pc D~a 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

-0.03838

-0. 01297 0.02427

0. 05193 0.06996 0.09486

0. 11188

0. 12332

0. 12529

0. 11690

0. 11396

0. 10643 0.09798 0.09281 0.08505 0.07998 0.07673 0.07527 Conf

~roo Hs 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.532747 0.214869

0. 136351

0. 107194 0.097679 0.085773 0.082199 0.083704 0.094114 0, 112455

0. 116501

0. 123111

0. 127933

0. 128153

0. 129888

0. 128872

0. 126664

0. 123720 UCL

~Pc

~Da 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.494364 0.201891

0. 160628

0. 159129

0. 167640

0. 180640

0. 194079 0.207030

0. 219410 0.229363 0.230462 0.229542 0.225916 0.220967

0. 214940 0.208861 0.203396 0.198993

0:

1

T I me

~uuuru 7.000 7.333 7.667 8.000 8.333 8'67 9.000 9.333 9.667 1D.ODD 10.333 10.667

11. 000 11.333 11.667 12.000 12.333 12.667

13. 000 13.333 13.667 14.000 14.333 14.667 Mass

~Lbm 523921. 90 523921.41 523905. 17 523913.89 523919.96 523911.38 523928.69 523897.96 523891. 94 523904.66 523901,40 523880.74 523899.24 523889.94 523874. 19 523883.27 523894.35 523907.61 523907.46 523884.36 523889.86 523867.88 523861. 32 523871. 58 Meas Leakage Pc Oa 0.036963 0.035586 0.043742 0.036924 0.032115 0.035413 0.025292 0.039472 0.040957 0.033768

0. 034127

0. 041928 0.032955 0.035746 0.040905 0.036306 0.031210 0.025594 0.024989 0.032302 0.029668 0.036155 0.037408 0.033354 Gale Leakage Pc Oa 0.07300 0.07075 0.07007 0.06834 0.06604 0.06447

0. 06162 0.06098 0.06058 0.05927 0.05811 0.05799 0.05860 0.05602 0.05586 D. 05521 0.05406 0.05244 0.05088 0.05014 0.04921 0.04893 0.04878 0.04827 APPENDIX 3G (CONT)

Mean of

0. 023514 0.024063 0.024918 0.025419 0.025686 0.026061 0.026032 0.026512 0.027010 0.027235 0.027458 0.027910 0.028063 0.028289 0.028649 0.028862 0.028925 0.028838 0.028739 0.028828 0.028849 0.029023 0.029218 0.029312 3G-2 Conf

~Pc isa

0. 121333

0. 119089

0. 116382 0.114246

0. 112468

0. 110501

0. 109168

0. 107080

0. 105059

0. 103415

0. 101806

0. 10017 0.098595

0. 097123 0.095578 0.094219 0.093058 0.092106

0. 091164 0.090011 0.088956 0.087794 0.086658 0.085632 UCL

~Pc I~Oa

0. 194341 0.189842

0. 186460 0.182588

0. 178516

0. 174978 0.170790 0.

168066'.

165644

0. 162689

0. 159924

0. 158006

0. 155398

0. 153147

0. 151447

0. 149431

0. 147125

0. 144550

0. 142046

0. 140155

0. 138166 0 136727

0. 135442

0. 133908

0

APPENDIX 3G (CONT)

Time

~Hours 15.000 15.333 15.667 Mass

~Lbm 523864.59 523868.03 523855.84 Peas Leakage Pc Oa 0.034748 0."032965 0.035827 Mean of Meas Leaks e

0.029432 0.029509 0.029644 Ca lc Leakage Pc Oa 0.04791 0.04743 0.04720 Conf

~ce oa 0.084613 0.083659 0.082689 UCL

~ace oa

0. 132532

0. 131090

0. 129893 Initial calculated leakage

= 0.011320 Final calculated leakage

= 0.047204 3G-3

I r

I

~

5800 5600 0) 5200 50 CU 480 600 4400 ZoI-CtN Ct 0)

Cf z I-0N I-LL Ul LL UJI-CJz LLI-M LU 0 ~

N

<<t LL UJOO CJz L):I-CQ LQ Ul Z 20 z N 0)

CC Ul LL

'z zo I-I-CJ g 0 J L)' N O Ul Ul ~ g oz-J acct O Q. )

CIz LU Ct

a. I-rn o V) LU UJZ LU o FLU N 0)LQ Ct I-LU LU o -J 0

(h LUI-LU Ul A LU 0 Z Ul O Lo N 0 Q.

LL UJ Q.

(Q 420 5800 0

CO JO C4 g

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 Ol Ol Ol Ol C4 OJ Ol N

C4 C4 C4 Ol Ol Ol Ol N

OJ N

Ol O

C4 CO e n

CO C

cO OJ 0

ol Jo g

cO lO C

CO Ol 8

0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

0 TIMEHOURS 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 C4 Ol Ol N

N Ol C4 Ol CJ C4 OJ Ol C4 Ol 0 0 0

Q 0 8

0 ol ccl 0

g co ct 3 g t ol

()

N lo

'It AP PEND I X 5H STABILIZATION,CILRT 6 VERIFICATION CONTAINMENT AIR MASS vs TIME TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

e

0.24 0.22 o.eo

~4 0.18 0.16 0

'K 0.14 O.12 O

5 I

0.10 o.os Ill 006

~ Q.

0.04 0.02 o.o ICI 002

-0.04 Q

-008 0.08 0

- 0.10 0.12

-0.14 (f

LEAKAGE N

12/51/80 0

C4 0

Ol IO 0

C4 Cb 0

C40N 0

OlN Ol 0

C4 lO C4 0

C400 I/I/SI 0

C4 0

0 Ol Ol0 0

0 0

0 N

C4 N

C4 O

0 0

0 TIME, 20 MINUTE INTERVALS APPENDIX 5J CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE 6 UCL vs TIME TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

l 7

4

O.l 9 O.IS O.I7 0.16 O.I5 O IO 0.15 O. I2 O. I I O.IO Ill 0.

I-I- Oas K ~

007 I-0.06 ooo 0.05 ICI 0.02 0.0 I 0.0 O

<<C

-O.OI O

-002

-0.0 I2/51/80 O

Oll OlO O

O I/I/Sl O

Ol O

O Ol Ol0 0

0 O

Ol O

Ol OO O

Ol 0

0 0

Ol 0

CO 0

O 0.0 T I M E 2 0 MINUTE I NTERVALS APPENDIX 3K CALCULATED CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE vs TIME TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

)R I

L E

V s

W rt

~ >

SECTION 4 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)

Local leak rate tests were performed by pressurizing with air the penetrations listed and either measuring leakage across containment isolation valves (Type C) or across resilient seals (Type B).

The total Types B and C leakage documented was verified to be in accordance with station procedures.

The following pages list the penetrations tested and their documented leakage.

T

APPENDIX 4A TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration

~C Equipment

~TCC ed Pre repa i r Leakage

~CC mid Post Repair Leakage

~CC IIII tl Rema rks 1

TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Equipment Hatch Personnel Hatch Inner Annulus of Personnel

Hatch, Emergency Escape Hatch Fuel Transfer Tube Inner Annulus of Emergency Escape Hatch 1979 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Emergency Escape Hatch Inner Annulus of Emergency Escape Hatch Personnel Hatch Inner Annulus of Personnel Hatch Equipment Hatch Fuel Transfer Tube 1978 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Inner Annulus of Emergency Escape Hatch Equipment Hatch Personnel Hatch 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 25 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

Flange 95 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 30 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

Flange 400 180 95 30 Cleaned seats and seating surface Flange tightened

APPENDIX 4A (CONT'D)

Penetration Nc Equipment Tested Prerepa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repa i r Leakage

~cc min Remarks Emergency Escape Hatch 0-Ring and Body 0

Fuel Transfer Tube Flange 65 65 Inner Annulus of Personnel Hatch 1977 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Equipment Hatch Personnel Hatch Inner Annulus of Personnel Hatch 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 440 0-Ring and Body 0

0-Ring and Body 0

0 0

Cleaned seats Emergency Escape Hatch 0-Ring and Body 0

Inner Annulus of Emergency Escape Hatch 0-Ring and Body 0

0 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange 200 200 All electrical cannisters were tested from 1977 to 1980 with no leakages noted or repairs required with one exception.

In

1977, electrical cannister T4P33 had a

leakage rate of 820 cc/min.

The cannister was repaired and the leakage rate was 0 cc/min.

4A-2

Pene ra ion o

Va Ives Tested APPENDIX 4B TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Pre reps i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks 1

8 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1 To RHR from Loop A Hot leg 5

PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7

PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8

PRZ Steam Samples 9

PRZ LiqUid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head SI to Loops 14 Letdown to Nonregen-erative Heat Exhanger 15 Charging to Regen-erative Heat Exchanger MOV-751

( I SC) 30 CV-516 (OSC)

CK-518

( ISO) 4000 CV-519A (

CV-519B

(

CV-522A (

CV-522B

(

CV-522C

(

OSC)

ISC)

ISO I SC ISC J and 0

CV-951 (ISC) 20 GV-956A (OSC) 0 CV-953

( ISC) 0 CV-9568 (OSC) 200 CV-4658B (OSC) 0 PCV-4-1014 (OSC) 60 MOV-872 (OSC) 0 SV-200A

( ISC),

SV-200 B

( ISC)

SV-200 C

( ISC) 750 CV"204 (OSC) 15 312 C

( ISC) 0 HCV-121 (OSC) and HGV-333 (OSG) 35 30 800 20 200 60 750 15 35 Lapped seat

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pene ra ion o.

Va Ives T~cc cd Prerepair Post Repair Leakage Leakage

~cc min

~cc min Rema rks 16 PACVS,'ydrogen Remova I 17 Sl Test Line HV-4-2 (OSC) 0 0

GI-895 V (OSC) 0 0

19A Containment Spray A CK-890 A (OSC) 52,000 0

Va Ive stroke readjusted 19B Containment Spray B

CK-880 A (OSC) 0 CK-890 B (OSC) 60 CK-880 B (OSC) 10 60 10 20 A 8c B Hot Leg Sample SV-955A

( ISC)

SV-955B (ISC)

SV-956C (OSC) 190 110 190 110 23 Containment Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP 24B Sea I Water Injection to B RCP CV-2822 (OSC)

CV-2821 (OSC)

CK-298A ( ISC) 297A (OSC)

CK-298B

( ISC) 297B (OSC) 7000 Va lve stroke readjusted 24C Seal Mater Injection CK-298C

( ISC) 0 to C RCP 297C (OSC) 25 RCP Seal Water Return NOV-381 (OSC) 0 29 Instrument Air Supply CK-336 (ISC) 350 SV-2803 (OSC) 0 350 4B-2

Penetra ion o

Va Ives Tested APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pre repa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer CV-4659B (OSC) 0 32 Containment Air Sample Return CK-11-003

( I SC) 0 SV-2912 (OSC) 33 Containment Air Sample SV-2913 (OSC) 120

>52, 000 120 265 Solenoid coil replaced and adjusted SV-2911 (OSC)

>52,000 37 Solenoid coil replaced and adjusted 34 Service Air 205 '( ISC) 204 (OSC)

>52p000 li200 0

0 Valve seat replaced and lapped 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment Purge Out Iet PV-2600 (OSC) and >52,000 80 PV-2601

( ISC)

PV-2601

( ISC)

PV-2602 (OSC) and >52,000 40 PV-2603

( ISC)

Rubber seat replaced Rubber seat replaced and tightened 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 53 PACVS 54A Conta inment Reci rc Sump to RHR Pump A

54B Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B

855 (OSC)10-567 (OSC) 35 CV-46688 (OSC) 0 HV-4-4 (OSC) 20 NOV-861A (OSC) 1500 NOV-861B (OSC) 300 35 0

20 1500 300 48-3

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pane ration No Valves

~Tee ed Prerepa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repa i r Leakage

~cc min Remarks 55 Accumulator Sampling CV-955C

( ISC) 0 CV-955D

( ISC)

CV-955E

( ISC)

CV-956D (OSC) 32, 000 260 Readjusted valve stroke 61B Deadweight Jester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Air In-out 65B Conta Inment Air Test Pressure VIV-C (OSC) 0 CV-2819

( ISO) 65 CV-2826 (OSC) 165 VIV-E (OSC) 0 VIV-F (OSC) 0 65 165 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow VIV-G (OSC) 0 4B-4

APPENDIX IIB (CONT)

Pene ra ion o

Va Ives

~Tmc md Prerepa ir Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Rema rks 1

7 TYPE C

SUMMARY

1 To RHR from Loop A Hot Leg 5

PRT to Gas Ana lyze r 6 Nitrogen to=PRT 7

PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8

PRZ Steam Samples 9

PRZ Liquid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT MOV"751 (ISC) 0 CV-516 (OSC)

CK-518 (ISC) 1700 CV-519A (OSC)

CV-519B

( I SC)

CV-522A ISC)

CV-5228 ISC)

CV-522C ISC and 0

PCV-II-101II (OSC) 0 CV-951 (ISC) 3600 CV-956A (OSC) 3600 CV-953

( ISC) 0 CV-956B (OSC) 0 CV-II658B (OSC) 0 1700 Valve packing tightened; plug properly seated II8-5

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pene ra ion o

Va Ives

~Tcc cd Prerepa Ir Leakage JcCcm i n Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks ll Alternate Low Head MOV-872 (OSC)

S I to Loops 30 30 14 Letdown to Nonregen-SV-200A (ISC),

erative Heat Exchanger SV-200B (ISC and SV-200C

( ISC 1000 1000 15 Charging to Iiegen-erative Heat Exchanger CV-204 (OSC) 312C

( ISC)

>50000 2000 Seat cleaned and gasket replaced 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Remova I

17 SI Test Line HCV-121 (OSC) and HCV-333 (OSC) 260 HV-4-2 (OSC)

GI-895 V (OSC) 0 260 19A Containment Spray A

CK-890 A (OSC)

CK-880A (OSC) 0 19B Containment Spray B

CK-8908 (OSC)

CK-880B (OSC) 45 45 20A 8c 8 Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP SV-955A ISC),

SV-955B

( ISC) and SV-9560 (OSC) 300 CV-2822 (OSC)

CV-2821 (OSC)

CK-298A

( ISC) 0 297A (OSC) 300 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP CK"298B

( ISC) 0 4B-6

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Penetration No Valves

~Tcc ed Prerepa I r Leakage

~cc min Post Repa ir Leakage

~cc min Remarks 24C Seal Water Injection to C

RCP 2978 (OSC)

CK-298C

( I SC) 2500 297C (OSC) 30 2500 30 25 RCP Sea I Mater Return 29 Instrument Air Supply 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return 33 Containment Air Sample Suction 34 Service Atr MOV-331 (OSC)

CK-336

( ISC)

SV"2803 (OSC 4659B (OSC)11-003

( ISC)

'V-2912 (OSC)

SV-2913 (OSC)

SV-2911 (OSC) 205

( ISC) 204 (OSC) 400 2700 16500 290 250 480 300 400 40 190 290 250 480 300 Valve lapped. and cleaned.

Replaced coil.

35 Containment Purge In let 36 Containment Purge Outlet PV-2602 (OSC) and PV-2603

( ISC)

)51000 PV-2600 (OSC) and PV-2601 (ISC) 30 30 90 Adjusted seat and sea I.

Adjusted seat and sea I

42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 855 (OSC) 1500 10 Replaced actuator, repacked bonnet 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 10-567 (OSC)

)51000 540 Lapped seat 4B-7

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pene ra ion No Va Ives

~Tee ed Prerepair Post Repair Leakage Leakage

~cc min

~cc min remarks 1979 TYPE C

SUMMARY

52 RCDT Pump Discharge 53 PACVS 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A

54B Containment Recirc Sump 55 Accumulator Sampling CV-4668B (OSC) 0 HV-4-4 (OSC) 0 MOV-861A (OSC) 1000 MOV-8618 (OSC) 0 CV-955C ISC),

CV-955D ISC) and CV-955E ISC) 2000 1000 2000 61B Deadweight Tester to PT CV-9560 (OSC)

VIV-C (OSC) 210 210 63 Instrument Air Bleed 2819

( I SC) 2826 (OSC) 70 140 70 140 65A Containment Air Test Alr In-out 65B Containment Air Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow (OSC)

Flange VIV"F (OSC)

VIV-G (OSC) 4B-8

Pene ra ion o

Va Ives Tested APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Prerepa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks 1

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1 To RHR from Loop MOV-751 (ISC) 120 120 5

PRT to Gas Ana lyzer CV-516 (OSC) 0 6

Nitrogen to PRT 7

PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8

PRZ Steam Samples 9

PRZ Liquid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT ll Alternate Low Head Sl to Loops CK-518

( I SC) 2000 GV-519A SC-519B CV"522A GV-522B CV-522C (OSC),

ISC)

ISC),

ISC) and

( ISC) 55 CV-951

( ISC) and 2300 CV-956A GV-953 (ISC) 2000 CV-956B (OSC) 2000 GV-4658B (OSC) 0 PCV-4"1014 (OSC) 80 MOV"872 (OSC) 0 2000 55 55 80 Stroke adJusted Stroke adjusted Stroke adJusted 14 Letdown to Nonregen-SV-200A

( ISC),

eratlve Heat Exchanger SV-200B

( ISC) and SV-200C ISC 120 CV-204 (OSC) 0 15 Charging to Regen-312 C

( I SC) 155 e ra t ive Hegg Exchange r HCV-121 (OSC) and HCV-333 (OSC) 60 120 155 60 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Remova I 17 Sl Test Line HV-4-2 (OSC) 0 Gl-895 V (OSC) 0 4B-9

APPENDIX 48 (CONT)

Pene ra ion No Va I ves

~Tmc cd Pre repa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks 19A Containment Spray A

CK-890 A (OSC) 19B Containment Spray B

CK-880A (OSC)

CK-890B (OSC)

CK-8808 (OSC) 15 15 20 ALB Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT SV-955A ISC)p SV-9558 ISC) and SV-956C OSC) 55 CV-2822 (OSC) 55 CV-2821 (OSC) 0 24A Seal Water Injection CK-298A

( ISC) 0 to A.RCP 248 Seal Water Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 297A (OSC)

CK-2988

( ISC) 297B (OSC)

CK"298C

( ISC) 297C (OSC) 25 RCP Seal Water Return HOV-381 (OSC) 29 Instrument Air Supply CK-336

( ISC)

SV-2803 (OSC) 55 1200 55 1200 31 RCDT to Gas Ana lyzer CV-4659B (OSC) 0 32 Containment Air Sample CK-11-003

( ISC)

Return SV-2912 (OSC) 33 Containment Air Sample SV-2913 (OSC)

Suction SV-2911 (OSC)

>52000 21000

>52000 21000 160 95 180 105 Solenoid

replaced, stroke adjusted Solenoid

replaced, stroke adjusted 48-10

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Penetra ion No Va Ives

~Tee ed Prerepa ir Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Rema rks 34 Service Air 205

( ISC) 204 (OSC)

>52000 320 700 320 Va ive lapped 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment, Purge PV-2600 (OSC) and PV-2601

( I SC) 40 PV-2602 (OSC) and PV-2603

( ISC) 5 40 42 Nitrogen to Accumu I a to rs 855 (OSC) 690 3500 Repa irs unsuccessful 47 Prima ry Water 'Supp ly 10-567 (OSC) 0 52 RCDT Pump Discharge CV-46688 (OSC) 0 53 PACVS 54A Conta inment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A

54B Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B

55 Accumulator Sampling 61B Deadweight Tester to PT HV-4-4 (OSC) 0 HOV-861A (OSC) 40 HOV-861B (OSC) 5 CV-955C (ISC),

CV-955D

( ISC d

CV-955E (ISC) and CV-9560, (OSC 250 VIV C (OSC) 0 40 250 63 Instrument Air Bleed CV-2819

( ISC) 85 CV"2826 (OSC) 200 85 200 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out 658 Containment Air Test Pressure Flange E (OSC) 0 VIV-F (OSC) 65C Conta Inment Air Test VIV-0 (OSC)

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pene ra ion o

Valves

~Tcc cd Prerepa ir Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks Leakage Flow 1977 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

1 To RHR from Loop MOV-751

( ISC) 400 400 5

PRT to Gas Analyzer CV-516 (OSC) 40 40 6

Nitrogen to PRT 7

PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8

PRZ Steam Samples 9

PRZ Liquid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head Sl to Loops CK-518

( ISO) 1 c60 CV-519A (OSC)p 0

CV-519B

( ISC)p 0

CV-522A

( I SC),

0 CV-5228

( ISC) and 0

CV-522C

( ISC) 0 CV-951

( ISC) 0 CV-956A 0

CV-953

( ISC) 0 CV-956B (OSC) 0 CV-4658B (OSC) 0 MOV-872 (OSC) 25 1160 25 14 Letdown to Nonregen-SV-200A

( ISC),

erative Heat Exchanger SV-200B

( ISC) and SV-2000

( ISC) 0 CV-204 (OSC) 0 15 Charging to Regen-312 C

( ISC) 30 erative Heat Exchanger HCV-121 (OSC) and HCV-333 (OSC) 100 4B-12 30 100

APPENDIX'B (CONT)

Pene ra ion o

Va Ives

~Tem md Pre repa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Remarks 16

PACVS, Hydrogen Removal 17 SI Test Line HV-4-2 (OSC)

GI"895 V (OSC) 0 19A Containment Spray A

CK-890 A (OSC) 0 CK"880A (OSC) 0 19B Containment, Spray B

CK-8908 (OSC) 20 CK-8808 (OSC) 0 20 20 ARB Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT 24A Seal Mater Injection to A RCP 24B Sea I Water Injection to B RCP 24C Sea I Water Injection to C

RCP SV-955A

( I SC) p SV-955B

( ISC) and 55 SV-956C (OSC 55 CV-2822 (OSC) and CV-2821 (OSC) 15 CK-298A ( I SC) 0 297A (OSC) 0 CK-298B (ISC) 1200 297B (OSC) 0 CK-298C (ISC) 25 297C (OSC) 30 55 55 15 1200 0

25 30 25 RCP Sea I Water Return HOV-381 (OSC) 20 29 Instrument A i r Supply CK-336

( I SC) 800 CV-2803 (OSC) 30 20 800 30 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return CV-4659B (OSC) 0 CK-11-003

( ISC) 250 SV-2912 (OSC) 1800 250 80 Replaced solenoid adjusted stroke 4B-13

APPENDIX 4B (CONT)

Pene ra Ion o

Valves

~Tee ed Prerepa i r Leakage

~cc min Post Repair Leakage

~cc min Rema rks 33 Containment Air Sample SV-2913 (OSC) 230 Suction 230 34 Service Air SV-2911 (OSC) 205

( ISC) and 204 (OSC) 200 2000 200 2000 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Conta inment Purge 42 Nitrogen to Accumu I a to rs PV-2600 (OSC) and PV-2601

( ISC) 15 PV-2602 (OSC) and PV-2603

( ISC) 10 855 (OSC) 15 10 47 Primary Water Supply 10-567 (OSC) 700 700 53 PACVS 54A Containment Reci rc Sump to RHR Pump A

54B Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B

55 Accumulator Sampling 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Atr In-out 65B Containment Air Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow HV"4-4 (OSC)

MOV"861A (OSC) 10 MOV-8618 (OSC) 0 CV-2819

( I SC) and CV-2826 (OSC) 600 Flange E (OSC) 200 VIV-F (OSC)

VIV-G (OSC) 10 4B-14 CV-955C

( ISC),

CV-955D

( ISC),

CV-955E

( ISC) and CV-9560 (OSC

)52000 VIV C (OSC) 10 150 600 200 10 Repaired va Ives Used for test boundaries

0

'E g