ML17353A799

Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TSs to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria

ML17353A799
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	07/17/1996
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17353A798	List: ML17353A799
References
NUDOCS 9607230088
Download: ML17353A799 (16)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED LICENSE 2QGBlDMENT FOR XMPLEKBITATZONOF 10 CFR 550, Append.x Z, Option B 3/4 6-1 thru 3/4 6-5 3/4 6-10 6-15 9607230088 960717 j

pDR ADQCK 08000250 PDR

3/4.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6. 1 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6. 1. 1 Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be maintained."

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

Without primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY, restore CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6.1.1 CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be demonstrated:

a ~

At least once per 31 days by verifying that all penetrations"*

not capable of being closed by OPERABLE containment automatic isolation valves and required to be closed during accident conditions are closed by valves, blind flanges, or deactivated automatic valves secured in their positions; By verifying that each containment air lock is in compliance with the requirements of Specification 3.6. 1.3i. and "Exception may be taken under Administrative Controls for opening of valves and airlocks necessary to perform surveillance, testing requirements and/or corrective maintenance.

In addition, Specification 3.6.4 shall be complied with.

"*Except valves, blind flanges, and deactivated automatic valves which are located inside the containment and are locked, sealed or otherwise secured in the closed position.

These penetrations shall be verified closed during each COLD SHUTDOWN except that such verification need not be performed more often than once per 92 days.

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 8( 4 3/4 6-1 AMENDMENT NOS.137AND 132

1

A HNT Y

CONTA NH NT KAG H T NG COND T N

FOR P

RAT ON Iv) ACCORD~ Mll-g ~~

Con&irvn~+ g~~gqgg.~

3.6.1.2 Containment leakage rates shall be limited. te.

'T<~> p~~~.

APPLICABILITY:

HODES I, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

With ~her-the measured overall integrated containment leakage rate exceeding

(,0 gal%

La

, restore the overall inte-grated leakage rate to less than 0.75 La and the combined leakage rate for all penetrations subject to Type 8 and C tests to less than 0.60 La prior to increasing the Reactor Coolant System temperature above 200'F.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREHENTS R~LVed 4.6. 1.2 The containment leakage rates shall be demonstrated at the-4~~p test schedule and *shall be determined in conformance with the criteria speci-fi d i c;.k.,+ ~ C,W Wa'~o~

4o >< fn 4$ S~hM$

COL4 sHQ7~Mhl mi444 4a 4/lo~j~

z0 gopz~,

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 5 4 3/4 6-2 AHENDHENT NOS 158AND 152

c.i 4

41 I

f d

. I>>

~ 'I 4

4

%r

~ W

)

I ll Ty 4 l

~

L 'sl

~

~

'I II C

11 g

s g'

g'<ll"

~

I n

~ '< I'>> 'L >

~

~I A

4l n,

4,

~,

~

g

~ I CONTAINMEN SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE R UIREMENTS (Continued)

If any eriodic Type A test fails to meet 0. 75 L

the test schedule for subs quent Type A tests shall be reviewed and approved by the Commissio

. If two consecutive Type A tests fail to meet 0.75 L

,a' Type A te t shall be performed at least every 18 months until two consecutive ype A tests meet 0.75 L

at which time the above test schedule may e resumed; c.

The accuracy o

each Type A test shall be verified by a supplemental test which:

1)

Confirms the ccuracy of the test by verifying that the supple-mental test re ult, L

, is in accordance with the following equation:

L

- (L

+

L )

[

< 0 25 L

where L

is the me sured Type A test leakage and L

is the am superimposed leak; 2)

Has a duration sufficie t to establish accurately the change in leakage rate between the Type A test and the supplemental test; and 3)

Requires that the rate at w ich gas is injected into the contain-ment or bled from the contai ment during the supplemental test be limited to between 0.75 L

and 1.25 L

d.

Type B and C tests shall be conducte with gas at a pressure not less than P

, 49.9 psig, at intervals no g eater than 24 months except a'or tests involving:

1)

Air locks, 2)

Purge supply and exhaust isolation va es, and 3)

Equipment access opening which shall be ested at least once every 12 months and after each use.

e.

Air locks shall be tested and demonstrated OPERA LE by the require-ments of Specification 4.6. 1.3; f.

Purge supply and exhaust isolation valves seals sha 1

be tested and demonstrated OPERABLE by the requirements of Specifi ation 4.6. 1.7. 2, as applicable; g.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.2 are not applicabl De.(e+c p~g~

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 Ec 4 3/4 6-3 AMENDMENT NOS.137 ANO 132

4

~'

a

/

l l

/

P P

i I

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT AIR LOCKS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6. 1.3 Each containment air lock shall be OPERABLE with:

a.

Both doors closed except when the air lock is being used for normal transit entry and exit through the containment, or during the performance of containment air lock surveillance and/or testing requirements, then at least one air lock door shall be closed, and b.

An overall air lock leaka e rate

+he Conknmerrf- ~

W~kn Pao APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2,,

a ACTION:

With one containment air lock door inoperable:

1.

Maintain at least the OPERABLE air lock door closed and either restore the inoperable air lock door to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or lock the OPERABLE air lock door closed; 2.

Operation may then continue until performance of the next required overall air lock leakage test provided that the OPERABLE air lock door is verified to be locked closed at least once per 31 days; Otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDO'WN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

With the containment air lock inoperable, except as the result of an inoperable air lock door, maintain at least one air lock door closed; restore the inoperable air lock to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 8( 4 3/4 6-4 AMENDMENT NOS. 137AND 132

C'1

)

r i

lt

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6. 1.3 Each containment air lock shall be demonstrated OPERABLE.

~n s er.ikey

<'n 4'.

Con&inme~f

, by Lee~e.

verifying that the seals have not been damaged and have seated properly by vacuum testing the volume between the door seals in accordance with approved plant procedures.

hoary~

b.

By conducting overall air lock leakage tests

%he. donkey~~

4AIN t

aW 7~+

fko c.

At least once per 6 months by ver> ying that only one door

>n each air lock can be opened at a time.

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 8

4 3/4 6-5 AMENOMENT NOS. 137ANO 132

~ ~ >>

I 2

5 ig<w h

4

'l C

II I 'I J ~

l(

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE"RE UIREMENTS Continued d.

Assuring that the observed lift-offforce for each tendon exceeds the min>mum required lift-offforce.

Required lift-offforces shall be calculated individually for each surveillance tendon prior to the beginning of each surveillance, and should consider such factors as:

1)

Prestressing history; 2)

Friction losses; and 3)

Time-depende'nt losses (creep, shrinkage, relaxation), considering time elapsed from prestressing.

e.

Verifying the OPERABILITY of the sheathing filler grease by:

1)

Minimum grease coverage exists for the different parts of the anchorage

system, and 2)

The chemical properties of the filler material are within the tolerance limits as specified by the manufacturer.

4. 6. l. 6. 2 End Anchora es and Ad 'acent Concrete Surfaces.

The structural integrity o e en anc orages o

a en ons snspec e

pursuant to Specifi-cation 4.6. 1.6. 1 and the adjacent concrete surfaces shall be demonstrated by determining through visual inspection that no unacceptable levels of corrosion exist on the end anchorages and no unacceptable cracking exists in the concrete adjacent to the end anchorages.

Determination of acceptance levels shall be by engineering evaluation of the areas in question.

If unacceptable conditions are found, the tendons inspected during the previous surveillance shall be examined to determine whether the corrosion levels or concrete cracking have increased since the previous surveillance.

Inspection of adjacent concrete surfaces shall be performed concurrently with the containment tendon surveillance (Technical Specification 4.6. 1.6. 1).

4. 6. 1. 6. 3 Containment Surfaces.

In accordance with SscQea-V a vlsua 1nspec son of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment, includin the liner plate, shall be performed, utdown=fee=(hut-prior-t ash-Typ~wo&a4me The purpose of this inspect>on shall be to identify any evidence of structural deterioration which may affect containment structural integrity or leaktightness.

The visual inspection shall be general in nature; its intent shall be to detect gross areas of widespread cracking, spalling, gouging, rust, weld degradation, or grease leakage.

The visual examination may include the utilization of binoculars or other optical devices.

Corrective actions taken, and recording of structural deterioration and corrective actions, shall be in accordance EILa4-a~le ~~~

R d

f p i

i p ti shall be reviewed to verify no apparent changes in appearance.

The first inspection performed will form the baseline for future surveillances.

We.

COrrfpfnheg Lca+e ~e-e~g P+p TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3 8( 4 3/4 6-10 AMENDMENT NOS. 149 AND 144

L

~

)

l

~

4 1

1'

AD I ST PROCEDURE G

Ued (3)

Identfficat1on of process sampling points, which shall include monitoring the discharge of the condensate pumps for evidence of condenser in-leakage, (4)

Procedures for the recording and management of data, (5)

.Procedures defining corrective actions for all off-control point chemistry conditions, and (6)

A procedure identifying:

(a) the authority responsible for the interpretation of the data, and (b) the sequence and timing of administrative events required to in1tiate corrective act1on.

d.

Post-Accident Sam li A program which will ensure the capabil1ty to obtain and analyze reactor

coolant, radioact1ve iodines and particulates in plant gaseous effluents, and conta1nment atmosphere samples under accident condit1ons.

The program shall 1nclude the following:

(1)

Train1ng of personnel, (2)

Procedures for sampling and analysis, and (3)

Provisions for maintenance of sampling and analysis equipment.

e.

Diese Fue Oil Test n

ro A diesel fuel oil test1ng program to implement required test1ng of both new fuel oil and stored fuel oil shall be established.

The pt ogram shall include sampling and testing requirements, and acceptance criteria, all in accordance with appl1cable ASTI Standards.

The purpose of the program is to establish the following:

a.

Acceptability of new fuel oil for use prior to addition to storage tanks by determining that the fuel oil has:

l.

an API Gravity or an absolute specific gravity.within limits, 2.

a flash point and kinematic viscos1ty within limits for Grade No. 2-D fuel oil per ASTN D975, and 3.

a clear and br1ght appearance with proper color; b.

Other properties for Grade No. 2-D fuel oil per ASTN D975 are within 11mits with1n 30 days following sampling and addit1on to storage tanks; and 6-15 c.

Total particulate concentration of the fuel oil is < 10 mg/liter when tested every 31 days in accordance with either ASTI D-2276 or

-5452.

v~eef-A.

TURKEY POINT - UNITS 3

& 4 NPS 169 AND 163

Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program A program shall be established to implement the leakage rate testing of the containment as required by 10 CFR 50.54(o) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B, and as modified by approved exemptions.

This program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program," dated September

1995, as modified by the following deviations or exemptions:

1)

Type A tests will be performed either in accordance with Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-l, Revision 1, dated November 1,

1972, or the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.163.

2)

A vacuum test will be performed in lieu of a pressure test for airlock door seals at the required intervals (Amendment Nos.

73 and 77, issued by NRC November 11, 1981).

The peak calculated containment internal pressure for the design basis loss of coolant accident, Pa, is 49.9 psig.

The maximum allowable containment leakage rate, La, at Pa, shall be 0.25% of containment air weight per day.

Leakage Rate acceptance criteria are:

1)

The As-found containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is < 1.0 La.

Prior to increasing primary coolant temperature above 200'F following testing in accordance with this program or restoration from exceeding 1.0 L, the As-left leakage rate acceptance criterion is < I%.75 La for Type A test.

2)

The combined leakage rate for all penetrations subject to Type B or Type C testing is as follows:

The combined As-left leakage rates determined on a maximum pathway leakage rate basis for all penetrations shall be verified to be less than 0.60La prior to increasing primary coolant temperature above 200'F following an outage or shutdown that included Type B and Type C testing only.

The As-found leakage rates, determined on a minimum pathway leakage rate basis, for all newly tested penetrations when summed with the As-left minimum pathway leakage rate leakage rates for all other penetrations shall be less than 0.6La at all times when containment integrity is required.

3)

Overall air lock leakage acceptance criteria is < 0.05 La when pressurized to Pa.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.2 do not apply to the test frequencies contained within the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.

ir J

~ ~

~

~ l'