ML17341B275

Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test,Types A,B & C

ML17341B275
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	03/31/1982
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17341B274	List: L-82-281, Forwards Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test,Types A,B & C ML17341B275
References
NUDOCS 8207190454
Download: ML17341B275 (102)

Text

REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUIZDING INTEGRATED ZEAK RATE TEST TYPE A, B, AND C SURVEILLANCE TEST FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NO.

3 MARCH 1982 8207>~0+5 05000250 q S2071~

PDR ADOCK pgp P

RE6IJulmRY HOCKEY FILE COPED

4 0!

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title PURPOSE

SUMMARY

2.1 TYPE A TEST 2.2 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (B AND C)

TYPE A TEST 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS 3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION Pacae l-l 2-1 2-1 2-2 3.1-1 3.1-1 3.2-1 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 Prerequisites Equipment and Instrumentation Data Acquisition System Data Resolution System

3. 2-1 3

~ 2 1

3

~ 2 2

3 '-2 3.3 TEST ANALYSIS 3.4 TEST RESULTS 3.4.1 CILRT Results Mass Point Method F 4.2 CILRT Results Total Time Method 3.4.3 Superimposed Leakage Rate Results LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C) 3.3-1 3.4-1

3. 4-1 3.4-1 3.4-2

0

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment Title 3.2A 3.2B 3.2C 3.2D 3.2E 3.2F 3.4A 3.4B 3.4C 3.4D Site Meteorology Instrumentation Table Instrumentation Location RHD's (Profile View)

Instrumentation Iocation RHD's (Plan View)

Instrumentation Location RTD's (Profile View)

Instrumentation Location RTD's (Plan View)

Containment Input Variables Leak Rate Data Mass Point Leak Rate Data Total Time Graph 1

Stabilization, CIIRT, and Verification, Containment Air Mass Versus Time 3.4E 3.4F 4B Graph 2

Containment Ieak Rate and UCL Versus Time (Mass Point)

Graph 3

Calculated Containment Leak Rate and UCL Versus Time (Total Time)

Type B Data Summary Type C Data Summary

REFERENCES

10CFR50, Appendix J,

Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power

Reactors, April 19, 1976.

Florida Power

& Light Turkey Point Plant Operating Procedure 13100.1, Integrated Leak Rate Test Unit 3.

ANSI/ANS-S6. 8, Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements, February 19, 1981.

Bechtel Corporation's Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants, BN-TOP-1, Revision 1,

November 1,

1972.

Qi

SECTION 1

PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a description and analysis of the March, 1982 Type A

Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT), and a summary of the Type B and C

tests performed since the last CILRT conducted on the Florida Power and Light (FPSL) Turkey Point Plant Unit 3.

This report is submitted as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Paragraph V.B (Reference 1).

1-1

SECTION 2

SUMMARY

2.1 TYPE A TEST On March 27, 1982, pressurization for the CILRT commenced at approximately 2130 hours0.0247 days <br />0.592 hours <br />0.00352 weeks <br />8.10465e-4 months <br />.

An investigation of all penetration areas for leakage was conducted during the pressurization period and throughout the Type A

Test.

At 0330 hours0.00382 days <br />0.0917 hours <br />5.456349e-4 weeks <br />1.25565e-4 months <br /> on March 28,

1982, 2 psig was observed in the personnel airlock.

The pressure in the airlock was vented off and the outer door was opened for leakage investigation.

Air leakage was noted around the lubrication fittings on the upper reach rods which are used for remote control of the inner and outer doors'qualizing valves.

The grease fittings were checked to see if the cavity was filled. It was determined by the pressure on the grease gun that the cavity was full.

The outer door was then closed.

Test pressure (68.6 psia) was reached and containment pressurization was secured at approximately 0944 hours0.0109 days <br />0.262 hours <br />0.00156 weeks <br />3.59192e-4 months <br />.

local leak rate test (LLRT) was conducted on. the personnel airlock at 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br />, to quantify the leakage of the inner door.

This LLRT was conducted by opening a test connection between the inner and outer doors, and connecting a line to the LLRT panel to measure the downstream leakage.

The LLRT panel was vented to the atmosphere.

The inner door leakage was measured to be 8,000 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM).

Temperature stabilization criteria was satisfied and the Type A Test was initiated at 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br />.

The inner door LLRT was monitored throughout the entire test period and remained essentially constant.

Temperature,

humidity, and pressure data was continuously recorded at 20 minute intervals.

Calculated mass

trends, from 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on March 28, 1982 to approximately 0200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br /> on March 29,

1982, indicated an acceptable upper confidence limit-total time (UCL-TT) of about 0.173 percent/day.

This rate satisfied the requirements of FPM.'s CILRT procedure No. 13100.1.

The Type A Test was successfully completed at 0700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br />, with a

calculated UCL-TT of 0.134654 percent/day.

A superimposed leak rate test was successfully completed from 0820 to 1220 hours0.0141 days <br />0.339 hours <br />0.00202 weeks <br />4.6421e-4 months <br /> on March 29, 1982.

2-1

At 1820 hours0.0211 days <br />0.506 hours <br />0.00301 weeks <br />6.9251e-4 months <br />, a LLRT was performed to quantify the leakage of the personnel airlock excluding the inner door which had equal pressure on both sides.

Both the containment and airlock pressures were continuously monitored by precision quartz manometers.

Using the make-up air

method, a

resultant leak rate was measured to be 14,000 SCCM.

Readings were taken over a period of one hour to ensure that pressure and temperature stabilization had occurred.

This LLRT demonstrated that the leakage of the outer door was, indeed insignificant to the outcome of the test.

Hhen the LLRT result (0 '10436 percent/day) was added to the Type A Test results (0.134654 percent/day),

the reported total (0.145090 percent/day) was well within the maximum allowable leakage rate (UCL-TT) of 0.25 percent/day.

Depressurization of the containment commenced at 1940 hours0.0225 days <br />0.539 hours <br />0.00321 weeks <br />7.3817e-4 months <br />.

During depressurization, an entry was made into the personnel airlock.

At approximately 2000

hours, a

liquid "snoop" inspection of the inner wall revealed the same leakage locations as noted previously at 0330 hours0.00382 days <br />0.0917 hours <br />5.456349e-4 weeks <br />1.25565e-4 months <br /> on March 28, 1982.

It appeared that the two upper reach rods were leaking at approximately the same rate as was observed on March 28, 1982, according to the inspector who had made both entries.

Complete depressurization of the containment was achieved at 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br /> on March 30, 1982.

2.2 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)

The Local Leak Rate Tests of containment isolation valves and other containment penetrations were performed by the methods described in FP&L's operating procedure No. 13404.1, "Containment Boundary Isolation Valves Local Leak Rate Tests".

Section 4

of this report summarizes the data for the three surveillance periods (1979/1980,

1981, and 1982) of LLRT's performed since the last Type A Test in accordance with Appendix J to 10CFR50, Paragraph V.3.

2-2

Qi

SECTION 3 TYPE A TEST 3.1 EDITED LOG OF EVENTS March 27, 1982 2130 - Containment pressurization was initiated.

2354 Inspection for leakage paths was started.

March 28, 1982 0330 - 2 psig was observed in the personnel airlock.

0400 Performed leakage investigation of personnel airlock.

Fittings on the inner shaft penetrations were checked for grease.

0944 Compressors were secured.

Peak instantaneous pressure of 68.604 psia was achieved.

1400 "Downstream" LLRT of the personnel airlock was monitored, and an inner door leakage of 8,000 SCCM was recorded.

1900 Temperature stabilization was completed.

March 29, 1982 0700 Leak rate test was completed.

0820 - Superimposed leak rate test was started.

1220 - Superimposed leak rate test was completed.

1305 Superimposed leak rate test was secured.

1820 Make-up LLRT of the personnel airlock (outer door) was initiated.

1920 Make-up LLRT of the personnel airlock was completed with a recorded outer door leakage of 14,000 SCCM.

1940 Containment depressurization was initiated.

3. 1-1

i+i ip

2000 - Follow-up leakage investigations of the personnel airlock were performed and similar leakage observations were noted.

March 30, 1982 1200 - Containment depressurization was completed.

3

~ 1 2

~j

3.2 GENERAL TEST DESCRIPTION 3.2.1 Prerequisites In accordance with the test procedure (Reference 2), the following is a partial listing. of the prerequisites that were completed and documented prior to containment pressurization:

a.

General inspection of accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment s ructures and components completed.

b.

All equipment and instrumentation, that could be damaged by test pressure, removed or protected.

c.

All instrumentation, required for the

test, calibrated or functionally verified.'.

Required valve line-ups completed, including closure of containment isolation valves.

e.

All computer software, used for test calculations, tested and operational.

f.

All Type B and Type C leak rate testing completed.

g.

The Official Iog of Events book established and available prior to commencement of the test.

h.

Site meteorology data recorded at least three days prior to and during CILRT (Attachment 3.2A).

3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation Pressurization of the containment was achieved by utilizing a temporary system consisting of eight air compressors manifolded to aftercoolers and refrigerated air dryers

~

The total capacity of the air compressors was rated at.

approximately 8, 500 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM).

The system included the necessary valving and instrumentation to maintain proper monitoring and control during pressurization.

The variables required to calculate containment leakage during the test were monitored using instrumentation which consisted of twenty resistance temperature detectors (RTD's), nine relative humidity detectors (RHD's),

and two absolute pressure quartz manometers.

Pertinent data for the test instrumentation is listed in Attachment 3.2B, and the 3.2-1

~gi

general locations of the RTD's and RHD's are shown in Attachments 3.2C-3.2F.

A rotameter was used during the superimposed leak rate test.

3.2.3 Data Acquisition System The Turkey Point Plant Unit No.

3 CILRT sensor data was recorded at approximately 20 minute intervals during the test.

A programmable, multi-channel data logger was used to scan and record data from 20 RTD's and 9 RHD's signal inputs.

Readings of the manometers and flowmeter were manually recorded.

The CILRT utilized a

portable programmable calculator to average the test data.

Periodically during the test period, weighted average temperature, weighted average relative humidity, absolute

pressure, vapor pressure, and mass values were computed.

3.2.4 Data Resolution System After the appropriate data had been acquired and averaged, the results were manually input to FPGL's offsite computer system for leak rate calculations.

3.2.4.1 Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis consists of calculating the air mass within the containment structure, over a minimum of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, using pressure, temperature, and dewpoint observations made during the CILRT.

The air mass is computed using the ideal gas law as follows:

RT (Eq.

1) where:

M P

Pv =

R T

V air mass, lb total pressure, psia av'erage vapor pressure, psia 53.35 ft lbf/ibm R (for air) average containment temperature,

~R containment free volume, 1.55 x 10 ft The leakage rate is determined by plotting the air mass as a

function of time, using a least-squares fit to determine the

slope, A

=

dM/dT.

The leak rate is expressed as a

percentage of the air mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

3

~ 2 2

lpga

Leak rate= A/B (-2400)

(Eq. 2) where A is the slope of the least-squares curve and B is the y-intercept.

The sign convention is such that an outward leak is positive and the units are in percent/day.

The air mass is calculated and correlated as a function of time by means of a least-squares curve fit of the form:

M=At+B (Eq. 3)

The slope A

and y-intercept B are used in Equation 2

to determine the leak rate.

A 95 percent confidence interval is calculated using a

Student T distribution.

The sum of the leakage rate and the 95 percent confidence interval is the upper confidence limit (UCL).

The measured leak rate may be described as 95 percent accurate to within the value of the upper confidence limit - mass point (UCL-MP).

3.2.4.2 Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis The Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis consists of calculating air lost from the containment, using

pressure, temperature, and dewpoint observations made during the CILRT.

The containment air mass is computed using Equation 1

(Section 3.2.4.1).

The measured leakage rate at any time (t) is determined by subtracting the mass at that time (Mt) from the initial mass (Mi) and dividing by the initial mass.

The measured leak rate is expressed as a percentage of containment mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:

Measured Leak Rate

=

Mi Mt (2400)

Mi(5t)

(Eq.

4)

The sign convention is such that an outward leak is positive and the units are in percent/day.

The calculated leakage rate is determined by plotting the measured leak rate as a function of time and then performing a

least-squares curve fit of the measured leak rate values as follows:

Calculated Leak Rate

= At +

B (Eq.

5) 3

~ 2 3

A is the slope and B is the y-intercept of the least-squares curve.

The.

95 percent confidence interval is calculated using a

Student T distribution.

The sum of the calculated leak rate and the 95 percent confidence interval is the UCL-TT.

This analysis method was used in conjunction with the procedure.

3.2-4

~

~gi

ATTACHMENT 3 2A SITE METEOROIDGY Date" 3/23/82 3/24/82 3/25/82 3/26/82 3/27/82 Time 1900 2300 0300 0700 1100 1500 1900 2300 0300 0700 1100 1530 1900 2300 0300 0700 1100 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 240D 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 oeoo 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

'l900 2000 Temperature

Ambient, OP 74 74 74 78 82 82 78 77 75 79 86 90 79 73 79 77 82 79 78 77 76 75 75 75 75 75 74 74 74 75 75 76 77 79 79 78 77 76 76 75 75 75 75 Barometric

Pressure,

~in.

m 30 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 29 95 30 00 29 95 30 00 30 03 29 95 29 95 30 05 3D 05 29 97 29 99 30 00 30 00 30moo 3D 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 29 90 29 90 30 moo 30 00 30 00 30 10 30 10 30 12 30 12 30 10 29 99 29m80 30m05 30m05 30m08 30 ~ 10 30 ~ 10 Wind

Velocity,

~mh 5

5 5

9 7

10 7

4 6

2 7

9 5

2 5

5 5

5 5

5 5

5 5

5 0

0 8

8 9

9 8

7 8

'l1 11 10 12 12

'l2 Wind Direction 185 180 180 170 150 180 170 195 260 230 220 120 170 270 190 300 270 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 60 eo eo 70 eo 60 60 70 60 60 60 50 60 60 Page 1 of 3

4~,

ATT165iMEBT 3 2A (Cont.)

Date TemPerature

Ambient, OP Barometric

Pressure, HIE Mind

Velocity, a@h Mind Direction 3/27/82 3/28/82 3/29/82 3/29/82 2100 2130 CILRT Started 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 75 75 74 74 74 74 73 73 73 73 73 72 73 74 74 74 72 73 73 70 70 74 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 73 73 73 71 71 70 72 71 74 76 71 71 71 71 71 30 10 30 11 30 11 30 11 30 12 30 10 30 08 30 08 30 10 30 10 30 10 30 12 30 15 30.14 30 16 30 15 30 12 30 10 30 10 30 09 30 08 30 08 30 08 30 12 30 12 30 12 30~ 12 30 07 30 07 30 06 30~05 30 05 30 05 30 05 30 07 30 05 30 08 30 10 30 09 30 08 30 08 30 08 30 09 30 07 12 12 12 14 14 13 16ie 20 16 22 22 22 27 23 24 25 24 23 15 18 20 18 18ie 26 24 22 26 12 12 10 2

0 3

5 9

8 17 15 28 29 29 29 eo 60 eo 60 eo eo 50 50 50 50 60 40 4o 60 eo 60 70 80 80 eo 70 90 90 90 so 90 90 110 120 140 180 190 180 200 240 309 300 300 310 305 5

5 20 30 Page 2 of 3

~t

~5

ATTACHMEHT 3 2A (Cont )

Date Time Tempera'.ure

Ambient, op Baxometric

Pressure, HcH Mind

Velocity, ng>>h Mind Direct@on 1700 1800 1900 1940 CELRT Completed 2000 2100 2200 2300 2000 71 71 71 72 72 73 73 73 30 10 30 10 30 10 30 12 30 13 30 10 30 10 30 10 29 28 23 26 25 26 20 20 30 30 22 30 o0 03 D7 05 Page 3 of 3

~1

ATTACHMENT 3 'B INSTRUMENTATION TABLE The following instruments were calibrated or functionally verified within 6 months prior to the performance of this test and in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J, and Field Calibration Procedures, using instrumentation traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

NOTE:

Instruments that were assigned a zero weight factor were not used in the leak rate calculations.

Channel CH-0 CH-1 CH-2 CH-3 CH-4 CH-5 CH-6 CH-7 CH-8 CH-,9 CH-10 CH-11 CH-12 CH-13 CH-14 CH-15 CH-16 CH-20 Instrument RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD Wei ht Factor 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.241 0.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.0396 0.241 0,0396 0.00 0.03

,0.0905 0.03 0.16 0.00 0.0905 0.018

~Accccac

+2.5%RH

+2.5%RH

+2.5%RH

+2.5%RH

+2 '%RH 22.5%RH i2.5%RH

+2.5%RH

+2.5%RH

+2.5%RH 0 SoF 20 5 F

+05 F

+05 F

+0 5 F 0 SoF

+05F

~0.5'F Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.2B (Cont.)

Channel CH-21 CH-22 CH-23 CH-24 CH-25 CH-26 CH-27 CH-30 CH-31 CH-32 CH-33 CH-34 CH-35 CH-36 Instrument RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD Wei ht Factor 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.0905 0.018 0.0905 0.03 0.16

~Accucac 20.5 F

io.s F

+05 F

205 F

~O.S~F

+0.5'F LOS F

+0 5 F

+0.5 F

+0 SoF

+O.S F

205 F

io5 F 205 F

TI-145 Quartz Manometer 1

N/A 0-100 psia TI-145 Quartz Manometer 2

N/A Rotameter 0-28 SCFM at 50 psig 0-100 psia 21.0% F.S.

Page 2 of 2

i

CH-0 EL. I40-00 CH-8 EL. 80-00 CH -3 CH-4 EL. 64-00 CH-5 CH.6 CH-7 EL. 30-00 CH-9 EL. 20-00 PROFILE VIEW ATTACHMENT 3. 2C INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RELATIVE HUMIDITY DETECTORS

( RHD'S)

TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT3 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

H H

3-8 STEAM G EN.

H PRZ.

04 H

H 3-C STEAM G EN.

oo H

H 3-A STEAM GEN.

PLAN VIEN ATTACHMENT 3. 2 D INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RELATIVE HUMIDITY DETECTORS

( RHD'S)

TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 5 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

,~

CH -10 CH. 36 CH -14 CH -12 EL. I40-00 CH-32 CH -16 CH 34 CH-11 EL. 80-00 CH 17 CH -13 CH.35 CH-21 CH-22 EL. 64-00 CH-24 CH-26 CH-23 CH-30 CH-20 CH.25 EL.50-00'H-31 CH-'33 CH -27 EL. 20-00 PROFILE VIEW ATTACHMENT 3. 2E INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTORS (RTD S)

TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 5 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

<Qi

H, 0

O CH 13 3-8 STEAM GEN.

H H

H H

H P RZ.

CH 24 H

3-C STEAM GEN.

0 0

CH 12 C

H CH 10 H

3-A STEAM G EN.

34 30 PLAN VIEW ATTACHMENT 5. 2F INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION RESISTANCE TEMPERATUR E DETECTORS (RTD S)

TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 3 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

3.3 TEST ANALYSIS Mass data acquired from the start of stabilization to the termination of the supplemental leak test are shown as a

graph in.4D.

The graph is divided into the following zones:

Zone A Depicts temperature stabilization period from 0944 to 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on March 28, 1982.

Zone B

Depicts acceptable mass trend from 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on March 28, 1982 to 0700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br /> on March 29, 1982.

This zone contains the data used for the leakage rate calculations.

Zone C - Depicts superimposed leak rate test from 0820 to 1220 hours0.0141 days <br />0.339 hours <br />0.00202 weeks <br />4.6421e-4 months <br /> on March 29, 1982.

The leakage rate analysis was performed by using FPEcL's CILRT program (Section 3.2.4).

The reduced data is shown in Attachment, 3.4A.

The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis (Section 3.4.1) represents the results qf the containment leakage rate.

The

results, as shown in Attachment 3.4B, show the UCL-MP to be 0.1070 percent/day which is within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent/day (0.75 La).

The Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis (Section 3.4.2) is used in conjunction with the Instrument Selection Guide (Reference

.3) to determine the duration of the CILRT.

The data used in Zone B

(Attachment 3.4D) satisfied the requirements of the test procedure.

The results of the total time analysis, tabulated in Attachment 3.4C, show the UCI-TT to be 0.1347 percent/day, which is within the acceptable limit of 0.25 percent/day (La).

To evaluate the effect of the personnel airlock leakage noted on March 28,

1982, the following actions'ere conducted:

a

~

The outer door was effectively removed as a

containment boundary by performing a LLRT on the inner door throughout the entire Type A Test period.

Thus, the inner door leakage was included in the reported leakage rates'.

The inner door was effectively removed as a

containment boundary by performing a LLRT on the outer door after the supplemental test had been 3.3-1

Qi

~ ~

completed.

This result was added as a

penalty to the Type A Test results.

The inclusion of both of these LLRT's in the Type A Test results indicates that the reported leak rates are both well within the respective acceptance criteria.

Thus, considering the conservative manner used to report the leakage

rates, it is concluded that the personnel airlock leakage did not have any effect on the acceptability of this Type A Test.

The following graphs are provided by this report:

Attachment 3.4D Containment Air Mass vs Time (0944 hours0.0109 days <br />0.262 hours <br />0.00156 weeks <br />3.59192e-4 months <br /> on 3-28-82 to 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br /> on 3-29-82)

3. 4E Containment Leak Rate and UCL vs

Time, Mass Point Analysis (1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on 3-28-82 to 0700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br /> on 3-29-82) 3.4F Calculated Containment Leak Rate vs

Time, Total Time Analysis (1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> on 3-28-82 to 0700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br /> on 3-29-82)

The Superimposed Leak Rate Test (Section 3.4.3),

performed from 0820 to 1305 hours0.0151 days <br />0.363 hours <br />0.00216 weeks <br />4.965525e-4 months <br /> on March 29,

1982, was used to verify the leakage rate test calculations.

The results of the verification test satisfied the acceptance criteria of the CILRT procedure.

3 ~ 3 2

3.4 TEST RESULTS 3.4.1 CILRT Results - Mass Point Method 1.

Leakage rate calculated, Lam 2.

95 percent upper confidence 0.099315 percent/day 0.007662 percent/day 3.

UCL-MP, Lam leakage rate plus 95 percent confidence interval (1+2) 0.106977 percent/day 4.

Correction for Type B Leakage:

Personnel Airlock 0.010436 percent/day 5.

Total Type A Leak Rate (3+4) 0.117413 percent/day Results were within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent/

days 3.4.2 CILRT Results - Total Time Method 1.

Leakage rate calculated, Lam 2.

95 percent upper confidence 3.

UCL-TT, Lam leakage rate plus 95 percent confidence interval (1+2) 4.

Correction for Type B Leakage Personnel Airlock 0.097074 percent/day 0.037580 percent/day 0.134654 percent/day 0.010436 percent/day 5.

Total reported Type A Leak Rate (3+4) 0.145090 percent/day Results were within the acceptable limit of 0.25 percent/

day.

3.4-1

0

3.4.3 Superimposed Leakage Rate Test Results 1.

The Superimposed Leak Rate Test is acceptable if Lc falls within the following range:

(Lo + Lam - 0.25La) 5 Lc 5 (Lo + Lam + 0.25La) where:

Lc

= containment leakage rate calculated during the verification test Lo

= leakage rate imposed on containment using a flow measuring device (0.21108 percent/day)

La

= maximum allowable leakage rate for ILRT (0.25 percent/day)

Lam = total measured containment leakage rate a.

Mass Point (0.099315

+

0.14858) 6 0.280676 5 (0.099315

+

0.27358) 0.247895 5 0.280676 5 0.372895 b.

Total Time

.(0.097074

+

0.14858) 5 0.282901 5 (0.097074

+

0.27358) 0.245654 5 0.282901 5 0.370654 2.

The Superimposed Leakage Rate Test met the requirements set forth in Reference 3.

3.4-2

~i

ATTA~IZ 3 4A FPEL TURKEY POINT PLANT UNET 3 ZNTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST FROM 1900 HOURS ON 3/28/82 TO 0700 HOURS ON 3/29/82 CONTAINMENT INPUT VARIABLES TXIBe

~Hours 0.000 0.334 0 667 1 000 334 1 667 2 000 2<<334 667 3 000 3<<334 3 667 4 000 4 334 4 667 5.000 5 334 5 667 6 000 6 334 Abs Pressure Psza 68.020 68 010 68 00t 67 992 67 982 67.974 67.>65 67<<957 67 949 67 941 67 '34 67 927 67 919 67 913 67 906 67.899 67 893 67 886 67 879 67 874 Rel Humxaity 76 080 76 213 7b<<364 7b<<462 76 563 7b<<b74 lb.775 76-821 76 914 76 989 77.041 7? 032 77 080 77 141 77 'l76 77 242 77 312 77 345 77 399 77 428 Vap Pressure Psxa 0 5763 0 5760 0.57bl 0 5759 0 $756 0.5752 0<<5754 0 574b 0 5743 0.5740 0<<5734 0<<5724 0 <<5720 0 5719 0 5711 0 <<570b 0 5706 0 5700 0 5699 0.5694 Dry Buib Tem ature 92.b 1 92.54 92.48 92.43 9?

37 92 30 92 27 92<<21 92 15 92 lt 92 05 91 99 91<<9b 91<<93 vt.86 91 81 9'l.78 91 73 91 70 91.b6 510879 1018 5108e8.80a9 5'10857 3621 510836 9133 510818.9545 510827 09at 5107s5.6759

>10788.9900 5107@3 blbl 5t07bb.o400 510772 2989 51077> 9270 510754.25 18 510737 1005 510750 4906 510748 83tb 510734.3603 510729 1271 510700.97b6 510706 5765 Page 1 of 2

0

ATTACHL~T 3.4A (ConC.)

Time

~HOul'8 6 ~ 667 7 000 7 334 7 667 8.000 8 334 s.ee7 9.000 9.334 9.667 10 000 10 334 10 667 11.000 11.334 11 667 12 000 Abs Pressure Psia 67 868 e7.862 67 856 67 851 67 845 67 839 67 834 67 829 67<<824 e7.sl9 67.814 67 809 67 804 67 799 67.795 67 790 b7.785 Rel Buna.chcy 77 <<463 77.590 77 569 77 608 77 bkl 77.o9>>

77 <<723 77 759 77<<775 77 767 77 750 77 719 77 741 77 743 77<<643 77 521 77 396 Vap Pressure 0 5690 0.5694 0 568k 0.5e80 0 5681 0 5674 0 5o70 0 5670 0 sess 0 5658 0.5o50 0.5644 0 5639 0 5629 0 5619 0 <<5610 0 5592 Dry Suib Tem eracure 4

Jf.b~

91 59 91.55 91 51 91 50 9l.kk 91 40 91 39 91 36 91-32 91<<28 91<<26 91<<22

91. 17 91 15 91<<15 91 10 Mass Lou 510698 5518 510679 b>>97 510osk 3480 510ob3.3637 510 b>>~.552>>

510bb5. 1922 510o61.5913 510b35 2140 5106~0.5c7Z 510 63b.4453 51oe37.ee27 510627 0821 510o~5.818 1 510646.081l 510b>>2 4312 510olf ~494 51063z 0925 Page 2 of 2

Ig)

ATTACHMENT 3m uB FPCL TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 3 INTEGRATED Lc'AK EcATE TEST FROM 1900 HOURS ON 3/28/82 TO 0700 HOURS ON 3/29/82 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD MASS POINT ANALYSIS Time

~Hours 0 334 0.667 1 000 1 334 1 667 2.000 2 334 2 667 3 000 3m334 3 667 4.000 0 334 4 667 5.000 5 334 5.667 6 000 Mass JLLbm 510879 10 510868. bl 510857.36 510836 91 510818 95 510827 10 510785 68 510788 99 510783. b2 510766.o4 510772 30 510775 93 510754.25 510737 10 510750 49 510748 83 510730. 36 510729 13 510700 98 Leakage

~Pct D~aj 0.000000 0 000000 0 153114 0.194517 0.21uu53 0 173142 0.202386 0.193790 0.181>21 0.179018 0 165o54 Om149614 Om145065

0. 144958 0.136551 0 128033 0 124337 0 120576 0 122246 Conf

~Pct r~Da 0.000000 0.000000 0.030697 0 092543 0 055213 0 072641 0 060021 0 047033 Qm039070 0 030674 0 030132 0 032174 Om027484 0 023303 0 022592 0 022041 0.019965 0.018235 0.016360 UCJJ

~Pct (~Da 0.000000 0 000000 0 187811 0 287060 0 26966b 0 245783 0.266807 0 201220 0 220991 0 20969'.

O. 1&5786 0 181788 0 172549 0.168zel 0 m 159 143 0.150 47u 0.144302 0 138811 0 138606 Page 1 of 2

i

ATTACMLt4T 3. 4B (Cont.)

Time

~Hours 6 334 6 667 7 000 7 334 7 667 8 000 8.334 8 667 9 000 9.334 9 667 10 000 10.334 10 667 11 000

%lo334 llo667 12.000 Mass

~Lbm 51070e. 58 510694 55 510 e79. 65 510684 35 510683.35 510649.55 510665. 19 510661.59 510635 21 510630.53 510636.45 510e37. 66 510627 08 510b25 82 510646 08 5106u2.43 510611 25 510e32 09 Leaxage

~Pct ~~Da 0 120586 0.119ze2

0. 1200lu 0 118559 0.116395 0 118034 0 llou29 0 114634 0 115099 0 115133 0 113880 0 112064

0. 110777 0 109@13 0 105921 0 102900 0 101872 0.0>9315 Conf

~xct r~ua 0 014796 0.013429 0.012198 0 011238 0.010593 0.00991e 0.00>329 0 008879 0.0081ue 0 007663 0.007292 0 007140 O.ooe854 0.00ee88 0.007384 0.00780e 0 0074e2 0 007462 OCL

~Pc D~a 0.135382 0.132691 0 13221?

0 129797 Oo126989 0 127950 0 125758 0.1&513 0 123345 0.122796 0 121172 0 119205 0 1176sl 0 115902 0.113304 0 110706 0 109334 0 106977 Xnitxal estunated mass

= 5108u7.65 Final estimated mass

= 510593.98 Page 2 of 2

lli e

ATTACHMEMr 3 4C FPSL TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 3 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST PROM 1900 H(NRS ON 3/28/82 TO 0700 BOURS ON 3/29/82 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD~ TOTAL TLUTE ANALYSIS Time

~Ho~s Meas Leakage Mean of Calc Leak ge Pct a

Conf

~Pct I~Da UCL

~Pct tea 0.000 0.334 0 667 000 1 334 1 667 2 000 2~334 2 667 3 000 3 334 3 667 4.000 4 334 4 667 5.000 5 334 5 667 6 000 510879.10 0

OOODOO 510868.81 0 144731 510857 36 0 153118 510836 91 0.198200 510818 95 0 211823 510827 10 0 146542 510785.68 0.219434 510788 99 0 181370 510783 62 0 168183 510766 64 0 176104 510772 30 0

150487 510775 93 0 132171 510754.25 0 146630 510737 10 0 153919 510750 49 0 129458 510748 83 0 122396 510734.36 0.127476 510729 13 0 124321 510700 98 0.139462 0

OOODOO 0 000000 0 000000 0 165350 0.176968 0.170883 0 178974 0 179317 0 177925 0 177723 D 174999 0 171106 0 169066 0 167901 0 165155 0 162304 0.160128 0 158021 0 156990 0 000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.192084 0.213942 0 183347 0.205210

0. 199770 0 190581 0 187361 0 176199 0 fb2372 0 156500 0 154130 0 146083 0.138137 0 133035 0 128326 0 127655 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 000000 0.000000 0 000000 0 ~ 145123 0 054954 0 337207 0.268895 0 134754 0 318101 0 107214 0 312424 0 094340 0 290110 0 088044 0 278624 0 079248 0.266609 0 077556 0.253755 0 077760 0 240132 O.O72658 0 067922 0.2291 58 0.222052 0 060138 0 057518 0 193173 0.185844 0 055676 0 183332 0.065370 0.211453 0 063062 0 201198 Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.4C (Cont.)

Title

~BolltS Mass

~Lb<<

Meas Leakage 6 334 6 667 7 000 7<<334 7.667 8.000 8.334 8.667 9 000 9 334 9 667 10 000 10.334 10 667 11 000 11 334 667 510706 58 0 127954 510698.55 0 127221 510679.65 0 133S53 510684.35 0.124747 510683.35 0 119941 510649 55 0 134797 510665<<19 0.120579 510661.59 0

'l17897 510635 21 0 127305 510630.53 0- 125105 510636.45 0 117918 510637 66 0 113423 510627.08 0 114567 510625 82 0 111545 510646 08 0 099516 510642.43 0 098096 510611.25 0 107851 12 000 510632 09 0 096700 Mean of 0 155462 0 154050 0

1530S8 0 ~ 151800 0

150415 0 <<149764 0 ~ 148597 0 <<147416 0 146671 0 ~ %45901 0 144&36 0.143886 0.14? 940 0 141959 0 140673

0. 139420 0 138518 0 137357 Calc Leaxage D. 124929 0.122595

0. 121872 0.119764

0. 117242 0

117452 0.

11553'.

113523 0 113126 0<<112514 0 111075 0.109264 0 107818 0 106202 0.103390 0 100722 0<<099417 0<<097074 Conf

~Pct Da~

QCL

~Pct r~Oa 0 053572 0

178500 0.051722 0 174317 0.050452 0.172324 0.048932 0.1o8696 0 047489 0 047008 0<<164731 0 ~ 164460 0 045813 0 161346 0.044690 0.158214 0 044113 0 157240 0<<043474 0 155988 0 042614 0.153689 0 041739 0 151003 0.040982 0<<148800 0 040232 0<<146435 0 037580 0<<134654 0 039496 0 142886 0 038783 0 139505 0 038238 0 137655 Initial calculated leakage

= 0.179946 Final calculated leakage

= 0 097074 Page 2 of 2

511788 5 1 1688 511588 5 1 1488 K 511388 fQ~ 511Z88 511.188 N 511888

~ 518S88 K

~ 518888

~ 518788 518888 5 18588 5 18488 ZONE R

ZONE 8 t

I

!zowie I

I I

I I

I I

I t

I t

I I

C' l

f tl 1II t

I t!

!I I

3-28-82 TINE HOURS 3-28-82 RTTRCHMENT 3.4D STRBILIZRTION,CILRT, 8 VERIFICRTION CONTR INNENT RIR MRSS VS.

TINE TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT 3 INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEST

I

f

~ 25 z

O

.zm NNKK

.15 UCL LRM

.18 3-28-82 3-2S-82 TINE HOURS RTTRCHMENT 3.4E LERK RRTE L UCL VS.

TIME TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT 3 INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEST

0

/ x LRN

.28 CCI-C)

. IS

.18 RTTRCHNENT 3.4F LERK RRTE 8

UCL VS.

TINE TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT 3 INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEST

0

SECTION 4 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPE B AND C)

Attachments 4A and 4B, which follow, summarize the LLRT data which has been obtained from periodic testing performed since the last Type A Test.

Prerepair data is provided for surveillance testing performed in 1979/1980,

1981, and 1982.

These LLRT's were performed by pressurizing the listed penetrations with air and either measuring leakage across the containment isolation valves (Type C) or across the resilient seals (Type B).

The acceptance criteria for Type B

and C

testing is in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J.

The combined leakage rate for all penetrations and

valves, subject to Type B

and C tests, is less than 0.6 La.

The LLRT's performed in 1979/1980,

1981, and 1982 were well below the acceptance limit.

New valves added during the 1982 outage were generally attributed to a TMI upgrade.

The attachments for this section are:

Attachment No.

Title Surveillance Period 4A 1982 Type B Data Summary 1/8/82 - 3/30/82 1981 Type B Data Summary 2/5/81 - 6/6/81 1979/1980 Type B Data Summary 12/4/79 1/23/80 1982 Type C Data Summary 1/8/82 3/30/82 1981 Type C Data Summary 2/5/81 - 6/6/81 1979/1980 Type C Data Summary 12/4/79 - 1/23/80

il>

ATTA(%MENT 4A TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No Equipment Tested As Found Leakage

~cc~Q As Left Leakage

~cc i~in 1982 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

38 Electrical Canna.sters 39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange 40 Equipment Access Hatch 41 Personnel Air Lock 49 hlnergency Air Lock 0-Ring and Body 0-Rang and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Rang and Body 80 16i500 80 1e,500 Page 1 of 3

~ ~

Qi

ATTACHNLNT uA (Cont.)

TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration Ho.

Equipment Tested As Found Leakage

~cc ?tiffin As Left Leakage

~cc min kemarks 1981 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

38 Electrical Cannisters 39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange u0 Equipment Access Hatcn u1 Personnel Air Lock o9 Emergency Axr Lock 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Rang and Body 135 75 75 Retest required after fuel movement; Page 2 of 3

if'5

ATTACHMEÃZ 4A (Cont )

TYPE B DA'IA

SUMMARY

Penetration 5o.

equipment Tested As Pound Leakage

~cc m~in As Left Leakage

~c~ci~n Remarks

\\979 1980 TYPE B DATA

SUMMARY

>8 Electrical Cannisters 39 Puel Transfer Tube Flange 40 Equipment. Access Hatch 41 Personnel Air Lock 49 Emergency Air Lock 0-Ring and Body O~g and Body 0-~g and Body 0-Rang and Body 0-Rang and Body 140 140 Page 3 of 3

ill

ATTAC&4hNT 4B TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No 1982 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Testee As Found LecLKage

~CC KlJl AS Left l,eax~ge

~ts sren kemacxs 1 To RHR from Loop C Hot Leq 5 PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT MOV-751

{ISC)

CV-516

{OSC)

SV-516 (OSC)

CK-518 (ISC)

STMK-519 {ISC) 1180 840 1180 840 SV-516 new valve; ST~-51>

new valve; 7 PN to PRT and kCP Standpzpes 8

PRZ Steam Samples 9 PRZ Liquid Samples CV-519h

((AC)

CV-51&B (ISC)

CV-522A QISC)

CV-522B (ISC)

CV-522C (ISC)

CV-951 (ISC)

CV-956A (OSC)

CV-953 (ISC)

CV-95oB (OSC) 0 (combined) 0 10@0 0

CV-951 replaced valve; CV->53 replacec valve; 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Bead SI to Loops CV-4658B (OSC)

PCV-3-1014 (OSC)

MOV-872 (OSC) 0 1500 38 0

1500 14 -Letdown to Nonregeneratxve Heat Exchanger 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger CV-200A (ISC)

CV-200B (ISC)

CV-200C (ISC)

CV-204 (OSC)

CK-312C (ISC)

HCV-121 (OSC)

HCV-333 (OSC)

<35 (CV-200h)

<35 (CV-200A)

(CV-200B)

(CV-c00b)

(CV-sOOC)

(CV-200C)

<30

<30

<35

<35 35 (HCV-121) 35 (HCV-1xl)

{HCV-333)

(dCV-333)

Page 1 of 12

4~

~ ~

ATTACk&iEÃT 4B (Cont )

TYPE C DATA SUl~Y Penetration No 1982 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Teittd As Pound 3 eatage

~CC Ill As Left Leakage

~CC llllII Remarks 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Removal 17 SI Test Line 19A Containment, Spray A 19B Containment Spray B

20 A and B Hot. Leg ample 23 Contaiument Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument, Air Supply 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment, Air Sample Return HV-3-2 (OSC)

V-895V (OSC)

CK-890A (OSC)

MOV-880A (OSC)

CKW90B (OSC)

MOV-880$ (OSC)

CV-955A (ISC)

CV-955B (ISO)

CV-956C (OSC)

SV-95ec SV-2822 (OSC)

CV-2821 (OSC)

CK-298A (ISC)

CK-298B (ISC)

CK-298C (ISC)

MOV-381 (OSC)

MOV-381A (ISC)

CK-336 (ISC)

CV-3-2803 (OSC)

CK-340A (ISC)

CVW659B (OSC)

CK-11M03 (ISC)

SV-2912 (OSC) 145 220 300 0

0 50

<35 0

30,000 400 40)52'00 35 55 145 220 300 0

'0 0

0 50

<35 0

<30 400 40 830 35 55 CV-955A and CV-9559 valves were replaced; MOV-381A new valve; system flushed; CK-340A new valve; valve seat cleaned and lapped; Page 2 of 12

4 C.

~II J

I i

~J J

8) 6 o

l'.i 4 9 V

fA CJt" sJ 8

Ql W3 p

t'"J

~

JJ (h

<<JJ fO VJ

,R JJ H

~l g

t'J V:

O.

J~J CI0 44 A

IP OJ Lg 0

iO JYe ql~

~ s Cph Cp QO C9 4

JC Q) p El Q

fo aQ 4

~s OQ VJ iL'(.

'E

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont )

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No'982 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leakage

~cc xc As Left Leakage

~c~cl~ln Remaras 33 Containment Air Sample 34 Service Air SV-2913 (OSC)

SV-2911 (OSC)

CK-205 (ISC)

V-204 (OSC) 1400 239 2300 20 t400 239 35 30 CK-205 valve seat cleaned; 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment.

Purge Outlet PV-2600 (OSC)

PV-2601 (XSC)

PV-2602 (OSC)

PV-2603 (ISC) 1400 (combined) 1400 3700 (ccxnbined) 3700 PV-2602 and PV-~603 half or valve seals replaced due co cracks; 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 53 -PACVS 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A 54B Containment, Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B 55 Accumulator Sampling 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed CV-855 (OSC)

CK-945E (OSC)

CK-10-5 67 (OSC)

CV-46688 (OSC)

HV-3-4 (OSC)

MOV-861A {OSC)

MOV-861B (OSC)

CV-955C (ISC)

CV-955D (ISC)

CV-955E

{ISC)

CV-956D (OSC)

Valve ~C'OS('.)

CV-2819 (ISC)

CV-2826 (OSC)

SV-2819 1020 0

25 3200 0

0 10,000 410 20,000 11,000 240 10z0 0

25 300 0

0 980 410 258 11,000 240 CK-&45m, new valve; HV-3-4 replaced valve:

CV-955C and CV-9550 valves replaced; CV-955E valve stroke adjusted; CV-2819 valve seat cleaned and lapped; Page 3 of t2

i ig>

ATTACHMEi&4B (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No.

'l982 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leakage

~CC 1ll As Left Leakage

~ct ts Remarks 65A Containment Air Test.

Air In-Out 65B Containment Air Test Pressure Flange

'E ~

(OSC) 520 Valve 'F'OSC) 45 520 45 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow Valve 'G'OSC) 0 Page 4 oi 12

ATTACHMENT 4b (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No 1981 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

~Valves Tested As Pound Leax,age

~cc As heft Leakage

~c~cin}

1 To RHR from Loop C

Hot leg 5 PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7

PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes MOV-751.(ISC)

CV-516 (OSC)

CK-518 (ISC)

CV-519A (OSC)

CVW19B (ISC)

CV-522A (ISC)

CV-522B (ISC)

CV-522C (ISC) 35 35

<30 (combined)

<30 8 PRZ Steam Samples 9 PRZ Liquid Samples CV-951 (ISC)

CV-956A (OSC)

CV-953 (ISC)

CV-956B (OSC) eo 0

60 0

10 RCDT and PRT Vent, and Nitrogen t:o RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head SI to Loops CV 4658B (OSC) 0 PCV-3-1014 (OSC) 150 MOV-872 (OSC) 0 0

150 14 Letdown to Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger

-CV-200A (ISC)

CV-200B (ISC)

CV-200C (ISC)

CV-204 (OSC) 40 (CV-200A)

(CV-200b)

(CV-200C) 40 (CV-200A)

(iV-200B)

(CV-200L.')

15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger CK-312C (ISC)

HCV-121 (OSC)

HCV-333 (OSC) 200 200 500 (HCV-121) 500 (HCV-121)

(HCV-333)

(HCV-333)

Page 5 of 12

ATTACHE NT 4B (Cont.}

TYPE C DATA SOMMARY Penetration No 1981 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Pound Leakage

~c~cu~n As Left Leakage

~CC lllill Remarks 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Removal 17 SI Test, Line 19A Containment, Spray A 19B Containment Spray B

20 A and B Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT 2'eal Water Injection to A RCP 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument; Air Supply 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment. Air Sample Return HV-3-2 (OSC)

GL-895V (OSC)

CK-890A (OSC)

MOV-880A (OSC)

CK-890B (OSC)

ROV-880 8 (OSC)

CVW55A (ISC)

CV-955B (ISC)

CV-956C (OSC)

CV-2822 (OSC}

CV-2821 (OSC)

CK-298A (ISC)

CK-298B (ISC)

CK-298C (ISC)

MOU-38 1 (OSC)

CK-33e (ISC)

CV-2803 (OSC)

CV-4659B (OSC)

CK-11-003 (ISC)

SV-29 12 (OSC) 23,000 0

60 2500 250 60 2500 1700 1,450 0

60 400 250 60 90

<30 CK-890A valve cleaned and lapped; CV-2821 valve stroke adjusted and seat cleaned; CK-11-003 valve cleaned and lapped; SV-2912 solenoid valve internals were replaced; Page 6 of 12

~5 JJ

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA SU!PNMARY Penetration No.

1981 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Pound Leakage

~cc in As Left Leakage

~cc in 33 Containment Air Sample 34 Service Air SV-2913 (OSC)

SV-2911 (OSC)

CK-205 (ISC)

CV-204 (OSC) 70 750

>52,000 1800 70 75 10 200 SV-2911 solenoid valve externals were replacea:

CK-205 cleaned valve; CV-204 valve stroke adjusted; cleaned vaive; 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment Purge Outlet 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators PV-2600 (OSC)

PV-2601 (ISC)

PV-2602 (OSC)

PV-2603 (ISC)

CV-855 (OSC) 25 (combined) 25 95 (combined) 95 8000 CV-855 valve stroke adjusted; 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 53 PACVS 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A 54B Contauunent Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B

CK-'l0-567 (OSC) 200 CU-4668B (OSC)

HV-3-4 (OSC)

NOV-861A (OSC)

MOV-861B (OSC) 200 0.

55 Accumulator Sampling 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed CV-955C (ISC)

CV-955D (ISC)

CV-955E (ISC)

CVW56D (OSC)

Valve 'C'OSC)

CV-2819 (ISC)

CV-2826 (OSC) 0 (CV-955C)

(CV-955D)

(CV-955K) 0 15 540 0

(CV-955C)

(CV-955D)

(CV-955E) 0 15 540 Page 7 of 12

~5 ip J~

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No.

1981 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leakage

~cc As Left Leakage

~cc Remarks 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out Flange

'ED (OSC) 0 65B Containment Air Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow Valve 'F~

(OSC)

Valve 'G'OSC) 180 180 Page 8 of 12

Qi Oi

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont..)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No 1979 1980 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leaxage

~CC l1C As Left Leacage

~CC 1ll Remaixs 1 To RHR from Loop C Hot, Leg 5 PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7

PN to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8 PR2't.earn Samples MQV-751 (ISC)

CV-516 (OSC)

CK-518 (ISC)

CV-5 19A (OSC)

CV-5198 (ISC)

CV-522A (ISC)

CV-522B (ISC)

CV-522C (ISC)

CV-951

{ISC)

CV-956A (OSC) 160 160 50 50 0

>52,000 30 (comnined) 30 CV-956A valve seating surf ace cleaned; 9 PRZ Liquid Samples CV-953 (ISC)

CV-956B (OSC) 0

>52,000 0

35 CV-95bB valve stroke adjusted and seating surface cleaned; 10 RCDT and PRT Vent, and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head SI to Loops CV-4658b

{OSC) 0 PCV-3-1014 (OSC) 90 MOV 872 (OSC) 0 0

90 14 Letdown to Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger CV-200A (ISC)

CV-200B (ISC)

CV-200C (ISC)

~-204 (OSC) 312C (ISC}

HCV-121 (OSC)

HCV-333 (OSC) 30 PV-200A)

(CV-200B)

(CV-200C) 15 300 10 (HCV-121)

(HCV-333) 30 (CV-200A)

(CV-200B)

{CV-200C}

15 300 10 (HCV-121)

(HCV-333)

Page 9 of 12

igj'

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetxation

=

No 1979 1980 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Pound Leakage

~nn in As Left Leakage

~cc in Remarks 16 PACVS, Hydrogen Removal 17 SI Test Line 19A Containment.

Spray A 19B Containment Spray B

20 A and B Hot, Leg Sample 23 Containment, Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to a RCP 24B Seal Mater Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument Air Supply 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Axx Sample Return HV-3-2 (OSC) 895V (OSC)

CK-890A (OSC)

MOV-8BOA (OSC)

CK-899B (OSC)

MOV-880B (OSC)

CV-9$5A (ISC)

CV-955B (ISC)

CV-956C (OSC)

CV-2822 gOSC}

CV-2821 (OSC)

CK-29BA (ISC)

CK-298B (ISC)

CK-29BC (ISC)

MOV-381 (OSC}

CK-336 (ISC)

CV-2803 (OSC)

CV-46598.(OSC)

CK-11W03 (ISC)

SV-2912 (OSC) 30 40 0

0 10 F 000 5 F 000 0

1,600 4,000 30 40 0

200

.0 3bO

.0 CV-2821 valve seating surf ace cleaned; CK-336 cleaned valve; lapped valve seat; CK-11-003 valve seat cleaned and lapped; SV-2912 solenoid valve internals were replaced; Page 10 of 12

i/i Qt i/i

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont.)

TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No 1979 1980 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leakage

~CC Xll As Left Leakage

~CC 1n Reaarks 33 Containment. Air Sample 34 Service Air SV-2913 (OSC)

SV-2911 (OSC)

CK-205 (ISC)

CV-204 (OSC) 20,000 500 12i000 10 0

10 SV-2913 solenoid valve ant,ernals were replaced; SV-z911 solenoxa valve internals were replacea; CK-205 cleaned valve3 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment Purge Outlet 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 53 PACVS 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A PV-2600 (OSC)

PV-2601 (ISC)

PV-2602 (OSC)

PV-2603 (ISC)

CV-855 (OSC)

CK-10-567 (OSC)

CVM668S (OSC)

HV-3-4 (OSC)

MOV-861A (OSC)

>52 000 (combined) 110 60 0-75 75 45 (combined) 45 PV-2600 ana PV-2601 valve seals replaced; 54B Containment Recure Sump to RHR Pump B

55 Accumulator Sampling 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Axr Bleed MOV-861B (OSC)

CV-955C (ISC)

CV-955D (ISC)

CV-955E (ISC)

CVW56D (OSC)

Valve 'C'OSC)

CV-2819 (ISC)

CV-2826 (OSC) 30 0

(CV-955C)

(CV-955D)

(CV-995E) 0 150 750 30 0

(CV-955C)

(CV-955D)

(CV-955E) 150 750 Page 11 of 12

4>'

ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont.)

.TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Penetration No 1979 1980 TYPE C DATA

SUMMARY

Valves Tested As Found Leakage

~cc hain As Left Leakage

~cc ruin Remarks 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out 65B Contauunent Air Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow Flange

~E~

(OSC) 90 Valve

~F~

(OSC) 105 Valve 'G'OSC) 0 90 Page 12 of 12

i if';i