ML17345B197
| ML17345B197 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1983 |
| From: | STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17345B196 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8308150109 | |
| Download: ML17345B197 (70) | |
Text
REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST TYPE A, B, AND C PERIODIC TEST FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NO.
4 May 1983 PREPARED BY STONE 6( WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION
- BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 8308150109'830805 PDR ADOCK 05000251 P
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title REFERENCES LIST OF ATTACHMENTS PURPOSE
SUMMARY
2.1 Type A Test 2 '
Local Leak Rate Tests (Types B and C)
TYPE A TEST 3.1 Edited Log of Events 3.2 General Test Description 3.2.1 Prerequisites 3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation 3.2.3 Data Acquisition System
- 3. 2. 4 Data Resolution System 3.3 Test Results 3.3.1 Analysis of Test, Results 3.3.2 64.7 psia CILRT Results 3.3.3 Verification Test Pacae iv 2-1 2-1 2-2
- 3. 1-1
- 3. 1-1 3
~ 2 1
3.2-1 3.2-2 3.2-3 3.2-4 3 '
1 3
~ 3 1
3.3-3 3.3-4 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES B AND C)
REFERENCES
- 10CFR50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power
- Reactors, October 22, 1980.
2.
Florida Power Ec light Turkey Point Plant Operating Procedure 13100.1, Integrated Leak Rate Test Unit 4.
3.
ANSI N45.4, American National Standard Leakage-Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear
- Reactors, March 16, 1972.
ANSI/ANS-56.8, Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements, February 19, 1981~.
5.
Bechtel Corporation's Testing Leakage Rate Testing of Primary for Nuclear Power
- Plants, November 1,
1972.
Criteria for Integrated Containment Structures BN-TOP-1, Revision 1,
'This document used only as a guideline and'ny reference to said document in no way implies compliance.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment Title 3.2A 3.2B 3.2C 3.2D 3.3A 3.3B Site Meteorology Instrumentation CILRT Temperature Detector Locations CILRT Relative Humidity Detector Locations Containment, Integrated Leak Rate Test Input Variables Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test Data-Mass Point.
3.3C Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test Data Total Time 3.3D 3.3E 3.3F Graph Containment Air Mass vs.
Time Graph Leak Rate and UCL vs.
Time (Mass Point)
Graph - Leak Rate and UCL vs.
Time (Total Time)
Type B Data Summary Type C Data Summary
SECTION 1
PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a description and analysis of the May 1983, Type A Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT), and a summary of the Type B and C tests performed since the last CILRT conducted on the Florida Power and Light (FPGL) Turkey Point Plant Unit 4.
This report is submitted as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Paragraph V.B (Reference 1).
SECTION 2
SUMMARY
On May 2,
- 1983, the pressurization for the CILRT commenced at, approximately 0805 hours0.00932 days <br />0.224 hours <br />0.00133 weeks <br />3.063025e-4 months <br />.
One 1200 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) compressor was lost, but a 900 SCFM compressor was obtained for a combined compressed air capacity of 8700 SCFM.
Containment pressurization was secured at 1955 hours0.0226 days <br />0.543 hours <br />0.00323 weeks <br />7.438775e-4 months <br /> on May 2, "1983, with a peak instantaneous pressure of 67.570 psia.
Temperature,
- humidity, and pressure data was continuously recorded throughout the entire test period at 20 minute intervals.
The temperature stabilization criteria was satisfied at 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> on May 3, 1983.
The start of the Type A test was extended to 0820 hours0.00949 days <br />0.228 hours <br />0.00136 weeks <br />3.1201e-4 months <br /> to permit continued stabilization of the monitored.
parameters as observed by the mass trend (See.3D).
The Type A test was successfully completed at 2020 hours0.0234 days <br />0.561 hours <br />0.00334 weeks <br />7.6861e-4 months <br /> on May 3; 1983, with an upper confidence limit total time (UCZ-TT) method of 0.169798 percent per day.
This rate also satisfied the requirements of FPEcL's CIZRT procedure No. 13100.1.
A mass step change verification test was successfully completed by 0348 hours0.00403 days <br />0.0967 hours <br />5.753968e-4 weeks <br />1.32414e-4 months <br /> on May 4, 1983.
The air mass equivalent of 0.25 percent per day was removed from the containment over the verification test period.
The results of the verification test also satisfied the requirements of FPK's CIZRT procedure No. 13100.1.
Reference Section 3.3 for a complete summary of the test results.
Depressurization of the containment commenced at 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> on May 4, 1983.
Complete'epressurization was achieved at 1330 hours0.0154 days <br />0.369 hours <br />0.0022 weeks <br />5.06065e-4 months <br /> on May 4, 1983.
A plant modification that increased the size and moved the location of the depressurization line resulted in an approximate 7 hour8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> improvement in depressurization time over the 1982 Turkey Point Plant Unit No.
3 CILRT.
2-1
2.2 Local Leak Rate Tests T
es B and C
The Local Leak Rate Tests (LLRTs) 'of containment isolation valves and other containment penetrations were performed by the methods described in FPGL's LLRT procedure No. 13404.1, "Containment Boundary Isolation Valves Local Ieak Rate Tests".
Section 4 of this report summarizes the data for two surveillance periods (1981/1982 and 1983) of LLRTs performed since the January
- 1981, Turkey Point Plant Unit No.
4 CILRT.
This summary is provided in accordance with Appendix J to 10CFR50, Paragraph V.B.
2-2
SECTION 3 TYPE A TEST 3.1 Edited Io Of Events 0805 1300 1500 1955 Containment pressurization was initiated.
Inspection for leakage paths was started.
Containment pressurization rate was 4.8 psi/hr.
Compressors were secured.
Peak instantaneous pressure of 67.57 psia was achieved.
Ma 3
1983 0400 2310 Temperature stabilization was completed.
Verification test was started.
0348 0400 0600 1330 Verification test was completed.
Containment depressurization was initiated.
Containment depressurization rate was 6.55 psi/hr.
Containment depressurization was completed.
e
3.2 General Test Descri tion 3.2.1 Prerequisites In accordance with the test procedure (Reference 2),
the following is a.partial listing of the prerequisites that were completed and documented prior to containment pressurization:
a
~
General inspection of accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment structures and components completed b.
C.
All equipment and instrumentati on, that could be damaged by test. pressure, removed or protected All instrumentation required for the test, calibrated or functionally verified i
d.
All required system valve line-ups completed e.
All Type B and Type C leak rate testing completed The
. Official Log of Events book established and available prior to commencement of the test g
Site meteorology data recorded prior to and during CILRT (Attachment 3.2A) 3
~ 2 1
3.2.2 Equipment, and Instrumentation Pressurization of the containment was achieved by utilizing a temporary system consisting of eight air compressors manifolded to aftercoolers and refrigerated air dryers.
The total capacity of the air compressors was rated at approximately 8,700 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM).
The system included the necessary valving and instrumentation to maintain proper monitoring and control during pressurization.
The variables required to calculate containment leakage during the test were monitored using instrumentation which consisted of twenty-two resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), ten relative humidity detectors (RHDs),
and two absolute pressure quartz manometers.
Pertinent data for the test instrumentation is listed in Attachment 3.2B, and the general locations of the RTDs and RHDs are shown in Attachments 3.2C and 3.2D.
A rotameter was used during the mass step change verification.
3
~ 2 2
3.2.3 Data Acquisition System.
The Turkey Point Plant Unit No.
4 CILRT sensor data was recorded at approximately 20 minute intervals during the test.
A programmable, multi-channel data logger was used to scan and record data from 22 RTDs, 10 RHDs, and manometer signal inputs.
Data readings of the flowmeter were manually recorded.
The CILRT utilized a portable programmable calculator to average the test data.
Periodically during the 'test
- period, weighted average temperature, weighted average relative humidity, absolute
- pressure, vapor pressure, and mass values were computed.
3 ~ 2 3
3.2.4 Data Resolution System After the appropriate data had been acquired and averaged, the results were manually input to FPEL's offsite computer system for leak rate calculations.
Absolute Method of Mass Point Anal sis The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis consists of calculating the air mass within the containment structure, over the test
- period, using
- pressure, temperature, and dewpoint observations made during the CILRT.
The air mass is computed using the ideal gas law as follows:
RT (Eq 1) where:
M
= air mass, ibm P
= total pressure, psia Pv = average vapor pressure, psia R
= 53.35 ft lbf/ibm OR (for air)
T
= average containment temperature, R
V
= containment free volume, 1.55 x 10 ft
-The leakage rate is determined by plotting the air mass as a
function of time, using a
least-squares fit to determine the
- slope, A = dM/dt.
The leakage rate is expressed as a percentage of the air mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:
Leakage rate
= A/B (-2400)
(Eq. 2) where A is the slope of the least-squares curve and B is the y-intercept.
The sign convention is such that leakage out of the containment is positive and the units are in percent/day.
The air mass is calculated and correlated as a function of time by means of a least-squares curve fit of the form:
M=At+B (Eq.
3)
The slope A
and y-intercept B
are used in Equation 2
to determine the leakage rate.
A 95 percent confidence interval is calculated using a Student's t distribution.
The sum of the leakage rate and the 95 percent confidence interval is the upper confidence limit (UCL).
The measured leakage rate may be described as 95 percent accurate to within the value of the upper confidence limit mass. point (UCL-MP).
3.2-4
Absolute Method of Total Time Anal sis The Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis consists of calculating air lost from the containment, using
- pressure, temperature, and dewpoint observations made during the CILRT.
The containment air mass is computed using Equation l.
The measured leakage rate at any time (t) is determined by subtracting the mass at that time (Mt) from the initial mass (Mi) and dividing by the initial mass.
The measured leakage rate is expressed as a percentage of containment mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or symbolically:
Measured leakage rate
=
Mi Mt (2400)
Mi(gt)
(Eq 4)
The sign convention is such that leakage out of the containment is positive and the units are in percent/day.
The calculated leakage rate is determined by plotting the measured leak rate as a function of time and then performing a
least-squares curve fit of the measured leak rate values as follows:
Calculated leakage rate
= At +
B (Eq.
5)
A is the slope and B is the y-intercept of the least-squares curve.
The 95 percent confidence interval is calculated using a
Student's t distribution.
The sum of the calculated leakage rate and the 95 percent confidence interval is the upper confidence limit-total time (UCL-TT).
This analysis method was used in conjunction with the procedure.
3.2-5
ATTACHMENT 3.2A SITE ihiETEOROLOGY Date
~
4/30/83 5/1/83 5/2/83 5/3/83 Time
~hrs 0400 0900 1300 1700 2100 0100 0500 0900 1300 1700 2100 0100 0500 0900 1300 1700 2100 0100 0500 Ambient Tempe ra ture
~F 73 76 77 78 75 74 72 75 77 78 75 75 68 77 80 80 76 75 75 Ba rometric Pressure
~ih h
- 30. 31 30.40 30.42 30.37 30.40 30.64 30.60 30.40 30.42 30.38 30.39
- 30. 11
- 30. 30 30.38 30.39
- 30. 31
- 30. 35 30 ~ 30
- 30. 30 Wind Speed
~mh 10 10 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 10 10 12 10 Wind Direction
~mz imuth 120 90 gpo 9po 90 90 920 82 880 9P0 750 88 100'000 110 90 9P0 1100 180o 0820 - Begin CILRT Test Period 0900 1300 1700 80 81 80 30.30 30.30 30.25 18 16 10 180o 180o 1600 Page 1 of 2
0
ATTACHMENT 3.2A (Cont.)
Date T I me
~hrs Ambient Tempe ra ture
~F Ba rometric Pressure
~h Wind Velocity
~mh Wind Direction
~azimu h
5/4/83 2020 - Complete CILRT 2100 0100 0500 0900 1300 78 76 75 79 83 30.25 29.96 29.96 30.24 30.23 12 10 15 17 160o 180O 175o 185 2llOo Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.2B INSTRUMENTATION The following instruments were calibrated or functionally verified within 6 months prior to the performance of this test and in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J, and Field Calibration Procedures, using instrumentation traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.
Channel CH-0 CH-1 CH-2 CH-3 CH-4 CH-5
~
CH-6 CH-7 CH-8 CH-9 CH-10 CH-11 CH-12 CH-13 CH-14 CH-15 CH-16 CH-17 CH-20 CH-21 Instrument RHD RHD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD Wei ht Factor 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495 0.0495 0.06 0.06 0.181 0.181 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.024 0.0603 0 '603 0.0603 0.0603 0.0603 0.08 0.0283 0.0603
~Accurac
+2.5%RH
+2.5%RH
+2 5%RH
+2.5%RH i2.5%RH
+2.5%RH
+2.5%RH i2.5%RH
+2.5%RH
+2 So/RH 0 SoF
+OSF
+05F
+05F
+OSF
+0 SoF
+O.S F
+OSF
+O.S'F
+O.S'F Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.2B (Cont'd)
Channel CH-22 CH-23 CH-24 CH-25 CH-26 CH-27 CH-30 CH-31 CH-32 CH-33 CH-34 CH-35 Instrument RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD RTD Wei ht Factor
- 0. 024 0.0283 0.024 0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.024 0 '283 0.024 0.08 0.08 A~ccurac
+0.5 F
+05 F
+0 5 F
+05 F
+0 5
F 20.5 F
+0 5
F
+05 F
io.s'F iO.S F
+0.5 F
+0 5 F TI-145 0-100 psia Quartz Manometer 1
TI-145 0-100 psia Quartz Manometer 2
N/A N/A
+0.001% F.S.
+0.001% F.S.
Rotameter 0-230 SCFM at 50 psig R1.0% F.S.
Page 2 of 2
CH.35 CH-10 CH.17 CH -34 CH.13 CH.12 EL. 140-00 CH-14 CH.16 CH.21 CH ~ 15 CH-31 EL. 80-00 CH-11 CH 24 CH-22 CH-33 EL. 60-00 CH-23 CH -32 CH-30 CH-27 CH 20 EL. 54'-00" CH-25 CH.26 EL.
20-00'ROFILE VlfW NOTE INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE.
ATTACHMENT 5.2C CILRT TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATIONS TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT4 PAGE I OF 2
0
~,
\\
4.8 STEAM GEN CH CH 15 ll 14 IO P R2.
CH 26 CH CH SI 35 4-C STEAM CH 13 4-A STEAM G EN.
O PLAN VIEW NOTE INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE.
ATTACHMENT 3.2C CXLRT TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATIONS TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT4 PAGE 2 OF 2
e
'I
CH-9 CH-8 CH 7 EL. 140-00 CH 6 CH.4 EL. eO'-OO" CH -5 CH.3 EL. 60-00 CH.2 CH-0 EL. 34-00 CH-1 EL. 20-00 PROFILE VIEW NOTE INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE.
ATTACHMENT 5.2D CXLRT RELATIVEHUMIDITY DETECTOR LOCATIONS TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 PAGE I OF 2
CH H
H H
H 4-C STEAM GEN 4-8 STEAM G EN.
H O
RR2 H
4-A STEAM GEN.
H H
PLAN VIEN NOTE INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLYAPPROXIMATE.
ATTACHMENT 3. 2D CTLRT RELATIVEHUMIDITY DETECTOR LOCATIONS TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNIT 4 PAGE 2 OF 2
3.3 Test Results 3.3.1 Analysis of Test Results Mass data from the end of the temperature stabilization period to the end of the Type A test is shown as a
graph in.3D.
The graph is divided into two zones:
Zone A - Depicts the extension of the stabilization period from 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> to 0820 hours0.00949 days <br />0.228 hours <br />0.00136 weeks <br />3.1201e-4 months <br /> on May 3, 1983.
Zone B
Depicts the calculation, May 3, 1983.
data used for the
" leakage rate 0820 hours0.00949 days <br />0.228 hours <br />0.00136 weeks <br />3.1201e-4 months <br /> to 2020 hours0.0234 days <br />0.561 hours <br />0.00334 weeks <br />7.6861e-4 months <br /> on The leakage rate analysis was performed by using FP6L's CILRT Program (Section 3.2.4).
The reduced data is shown in Attachment 3 'A.
The temperature stabilization criteria was satisfied at 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> on May 3, 1983.
The mass trend data in Zone A
exhibits a
relatively
- stable, almost flat, slope from 0500 to 0820 hours0.00949 days <br />0.228 hours <br />0.00136 weeks <br />3.1201e-4 months <br />.
The mass trend data in Zone B exhibits a
relatively
- stable, slightly
- downward, slope from 0820 to 2020 hours0.0234 days <br />0.561 hours <br />0.00334 weeks <br />7.6861e-4 months <br />.
The start of the CILRT was conservatively extended to 0820 hours0.00949 days <br />0.228 hours <br />0.00136 weeks <br />3.1201e-4 months <br /> on May 3,
- 1983, based on the steeper slope of the mass trend in Zone B.
The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis (Section 3.2.4) containment leakage rate test results are shown in.3B.
The results, 0.076215 percent per day, show the upper confidence limit-mass point (UCL-MP) to be well within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 percent per day (0.75 La).
The Absolute Method of Total Time Analysis (Section 3.2.4) is used in conjunction with the Instrument Selection Guide (Reference 4) to determine the duration of the CILRT.
The
- results, 0.169798 percent per day, show the UCL-TT to be well within the acceptable limit of 0.25 percent per day (La).
Graphs of the containment leakage rate for the mass point and for the total time analysis are shown in Attachments 3.3E and 3.3F.
The Mass Step Change Verification Test was performed from 2308 hours0.0267 days <br />0.641 hours <br />0.00382 weeks <br />8.78194e-4 months <br /> on May 3, 1983, to 0050 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> on May 4,
- 1983, and from 0248 hours0.00287 days <br />0.0689 hours <br />4.100529e-4 weeks <br />9.4364e-5 months <br /> to 0348 hours0.00403 days <br />0.0967 hours <br />5.753968e-4 weeks <br />1.32414e-4 months <br /> on May 4, 1983.
The reason for the two separate intervals was to ensure a full air mass equivalent of La was taken out of the containment.
The calibration of the verification test rotameter was based on a
test pressure of 64.7 psia,
- however, the actual inlet pressure to the rotameter was only 6 psig.
Correcting for the new inlet conditions required additional mass removal.
The results of the verification test satisfied the acceptance criteria of the CII,RT 3 ~ 3 1
procedure.
A complete summary of the test results is outlined in Section 3 '.2.,
3
~ 3 2
3.3.2 64.7 psia CILRT Results A.
Mass Point Method 1.
Leakage rate measured, Lam 2.
95 percent upper confidence 0.069926 percent/day 0.006288 percent/day B.
3.
UCL-MP, Lam leakage rate plus 95 percent confidence interval (1+2) 0.076215 percent/day Results were within the acceptable limit of 0.1875 per-cent/day.
Total Time Method 1.
Leakage rate calculated, Lam 2.
95 percent upper confidence 3.
UCL-TT, Lam leakage rate plus 95 percent confidence interval (1+2)
Results were within the 0.25 percent/day.
0.053590 percent/day 0.116208 percent/day 0.169798 percent/day acceptable limit of
- 3. 3-3
3.3.3 Verification Test Results The supplemental verification test was performed using the Mass Step Change Verification Method in accordance with Section 8.0 of Operating Procedure 13100.1.
a.
Calculated change in containment gas mass 1279 ibm b.
Total measured gas flow out of containment 1324 ibm c.
Difference between measured gas and calculated gas (b-a) 45 ibm d.
0.25 La verification limit 317 ibm Results of the Mass Step Verification Test are acceptable as the difference between the verification test data and the Type A test data is within 0.25 La.
3.3-4
ATTACHMENT 3.3A CONTAINHENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST From 0820 Hours On 5/3/83 To 2020 Hours On 5/3/83 INPUT VARIABLES Time
~hrs 0820 0840 0900 0920 0940 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1220 1240 1300 1320 1340 1400 1420 1440 Abs. Pressure
~ai a 66.463 66.457 66 '51 66.445 66.441 66.436 66.431 66.428 66.422 66.417 66.413 66.410 66.407 66.404
- 66. 401 66.398 66.395 66.393 66.391 66.388 Rel. Humidity
- 83. 31 83.30
- 83. 31
- 83. 31
.83.31 83.33 83'0 83.33 83.30 83.31 83.32 83.29 83.28 83.25 83.28 83.21
- 83. 19
- 83. 18
- 83. 16
- 83. 16 Vap.
Pressure sia 0.5378 0.5376 0.5367 0.5361 0.5355 0.5354 0.5344 0.5343 0.5340 0.5335 0.5331 0.5328 0.5325 0.5316
- 0. 5316
- 0. 5312 0.5304 0.5303 0.5298 0.5298 Ory Bulb Tem era ure 87.48 87.47
- 87. 41 87.38 87.35 87.33 87.28 87.27 87.26 87.23 87.20
- 87. 19
- 87. 18
- 87. 14
- 87. 13
- 87. 13 87.09 87.09 87.07 87.07 oF Hass
~Ibm 504 060.5 504 028 F 7 504 040. 1 504 027 '
504 034 ~ 1 504 012.0 504 027.6 504 015.3 503 978.6 503 974.7 503 973.5 503 960.7 503 953.6 503 972.0 503 956.4 503 936.7 503 954. 1 503 943.7 503 949.7 503 928.3 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.3A {Cont.)
Time
~hrs 1500 1520 1540 1600 1620 1640 1700 1720 1740 1800 1820 1840 1900 1920 1940 2000 2020 Abs.
Pressure 66.385 66.384 66.382 66.380 66.378 66.376 66.374 66.372 66.371 66.369 66.367 66.366 66.365 66.363 66.362 66.360 66.359 Rel. Humidity
- 83. 14
- 83. 11 83.17 83.03 83.03 83.00 82.99 82.94
- 82. 91 82.88 82.87 82.86 82.79 82.79
- 82. 81 82.75 82.71 Vap.
Pressure sia 0.5296 0.5291 0.5294 0.5285 0.5280 0.5275 0.5275 0.5271 0.5269 0.5266 0.5263 0.5263 0.5256 0.5255 0.5254 0.5250 0.5245 Ory Bulb Tem era ure 87.06 87.05 87.04 87.04 87.01 87.00 87.00 86.99 86.99 86.98 86.97 86.97 86.96 86.95
- 86. 94 86.94 86.92 oF Mass
~Ibm 503 911
~ 0 503 922.7 503 913.8 503 908.4 503 921.6 503 921.7.
503 904.8 503 900.5 503 896.7 503 886.3 503 889.5 503 876.3 503 886. 1 503 878. 1 503 882.7 503 870.2 503 885.2 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.3B CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST From 0820 Hours On 5/3/83 To 2020 Hours On 5/3/83 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD MASS POINT ANALYSIS Time
~hrs 0820 0840 0900 0920 0940 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1220 1240 1300 1320 1340 1400 1420 1440 Mass
~Ibm 504 060.5 504 028.7 504 040. 1 504 027.2 504 034. 1 504 012.0 504 027.6 504 015.3 503 978.6 503 974.7 503 973.5 503 960.7 503 953.2 503 972.0 503 956.4 503 936.7 503 954. 1 503 943.7 503 949.7 503 928.3 Leakage
~coda 0.000 000 0.000 000
- 0. 145 361
- 0. 126 193 0.077 570 0.097 741 0.070 466 0.067 868 0.097 128
- 0. 109 733 O. I12 438
- 0. 116 680
- 0. 118 956 0.109 303 0.105 876
- 0. 107 451
- 0. 101 557 0.098 230 0.092 949 95 Pct.
Conf.
0.000 000 0.000 000 1.273 837 0.309 726 0.166 315
- 0. 102 031 0.078 382 0.055 943 0.057 827 0.048 049 0.038 675 0.032 173 0.027 023 0.025 930 0.022 674 0.019 784 0.018 796 0.017 103 0.016 528 0.092 149.
0.014 841 UCL Q>~cd~a 0.000 000 0.000 000 1.419 198 0.435 919 0.243 886
- 0. 199 772 0.148 848
- 0. 123 811 0.154 955 0.157 782 0.151 113
- 0. 148 854 0 ~ 145 979 0.135 233
- 0. 128 550
- 0. 127 235 0 ~ 120 353 0.115 333
- 0. 109 477 0.106 990 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.38 (Cont'd)
Time
~hrs 1500 1520 1540 1600 1620 1640 1700 1720 1740 1800 1820 1840 1900 1920 1940 2000 2020 Ha ss
~Ibm 503 911.0 503 922.7 503 913.9 503 908.4 503 921.6 503 921.7 503 904.8 503 900.5 503 896.7 503 886.3 503 889.5 503 876.3 503 886.1 503 878. 1 503 882.7 503 870.2 503 885.2 Leakage Q>~cd~a 0.093 570 0.091 542 0.090 377 0.089 354 0.085 998 0.082 605 0.081 177 0.079 880 0.078 659 0.078 115 0.076 922 0.076 578 0.075 129 0.074 126 0.072 619 0.071 822 0.069 926 95 Pct.
Conf.
- 0. 013 483 0.012 456 0.011 422 0.010 511 0.010 445 0.010 434 0.009 788 0.009 200 0.008 671 0.008 104 0.007 699 0.007 218 0.006 983 0.006 669 0.006 525 0.006 226 0.006 288 UCL Q>~ct d~a 0.107 053
- 0. 103 998
- 0. 101 799 0.099 866 0.096 443 0.093 038 0.090 964 0.089 080 0.087 330 0.086 219 0.084 621 0.083 796 0.082 112 0.080 794 0.079 143 0.078 048 0.076 215 Initial estimated mass
= 504 033.6 Final estimated mass
= 503 857.4 Page 2 of 2
0
ATTACHMENT 3.3C CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST From 0820 Hours On 5/3/83 To 2020 Hours On 5/3/83 ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD TOTAL TIME A ALYSIS Time
~hrs Mass
~ibm Meas.
Leakage c
da Mean of Meas.
Leaka e
Ca I c.
Leakage c
da 95 Pct.
Conf.
ct da UCL Q>~cd~a 0820 0840 0900 0920 0940 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1220 1240 1300 1320 1340 1400 1420 1440 504 060.49 0.000 000 504 028.72 0.454 348 504 040. 11
- 0. 145 513 504 027.23
- 0. 158 385 504 034.08 0.094 335 504 011.95 504 027.64 0.138 665 0.078 217 503 943.71 503 949.70 503 928.27 0.098 121 0.087 920 0.099 '413 504 015. 34
- 0. 092 145 503 978.59 0'46 226 503 974.73 0.136 121 503 973.48
- 0. 124 308 503 960.71
- 0. 129 563 503 953. 16
- 0. 127 764 503 972.00 0.097 239 503 956.36
- 0. 106 241 503 936.68
- 0. 117 907 503 954.07 0.095 017 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.252 749 0.213 145
- 0. 198 249
- 0. 178 244
- 0. 165 944 0.163 479
- 0. 160 440
- 0. 156 826
- 0. 154 348 0.152 133
- 0. 147 910 0.144 934 0.143 132
- 0. 140 125 0.137 654 0.134 891 0.133 024 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000
- 0. 104 761 0.053 061 0.061 674 0.037 863 0.032 996
.0.054 285 0.065 811 0.070 542 0.076 225 0.080 418 0.075 590 0.074 500 0.076 782 0.073 627 0.071 942 0.068 687 0.068 404 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 1.270 401 0.537 011 0.434 556 0.341 606 0'00 895 0.294 815 0.276 770 0.257 516 0.242 439 0.229 112 0.215 006 0.204 076 0.195 787
- 0. 186 925 0'79 484
- 0. 172 524
- 0. 167 015 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 1.375 161 0.590 072 0.496 229 0.379 469 0.333 891 0.349 100 0.342 580 0.328 059 0.318 664 0.309 529 0.290 596 0.278 576 0.272 570 0.260 552 0.251 426 0.241 211 0.235 419 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3.3C t Cont'd)
Time
~hrs Mass
~Ibm Mea s.
Lea kage 1500 1520 1540 503 910.95 0.106 800 503 922'8 0.093 743 503 913.85 0.095 219 1620 503 921.55 0.082 694 1640 503 921.71 0.079 297 1700 503 904.76 0.085 555 1720 503 900.54 0.084 624 1740 1800 1820 1840 1900 1920 1940 2000 2020 503 896.72 0.083 551 503 886.34 0.085 777 503 889.54 0.081 399 503 876.28 0.084 882 503 886. 14
- 0.077 827 503 878.05 0.078 971 503 882.66 0.074 713 503 870.22 0.077 652 503 885.24 0.069 537 1600 503 908.38 0.094 466 Mean of Meas Leaka e
- 0. 131 712 0.129 904
- 0. 128 328
- 0. 126 856 0.125 015 0.123 187 0.121 739 0.120 365 0.119 050 0.117 903 0.116 686 0.115 660
- 0. 114 478
- 0. 113 402 0.112 264 0'11 275 0 ~ 110 115 Ca Ic.
Leakage 0.069 677 0.068 583 0.068 025 0.067 520 0.065 353 0.063 053 0.062 031 0.061 097 0.060 201 0.059 757 0.058 880 0.058 585 0.057 523 0.056 763 0.055 646 0.054 994 0.053 590 95 Pct Conf.
0.162 544
- 0. 157 733
- 0. 153 473 0.149 578 0.145 614 0.141 928 0.138 769 0.135 836 0.133 100 0..130 652
- 0. 128 231
- 0. 126 095
- 0. 123 891
- 0. 121 867
- 0. 119 867 0.118 075 0.116 208 UCL
~ct <~da 0.232 221 0.226 317 0.221 498 0.217 098 0.210 967 0.204 982 0.200 801 0 ~ 196 933 0.193 301 0.190 409
- 0. 187 112 0.184 680 0.181 414
- 0. 178 629 0.175 513
- 0. 173 069
- 0. 169 798 Page 2 of 2
584 158 ZONE H
584188 5-83-83 RTTRCHMENT 3.3D TIHE HOURS CONTRINMENT R IR MRSS VS.
TIME TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEST
.55
.08 x
.35 0
.38 Vl Q)
.25 I:
.Z8 l
l l
l LRM
.15
.18
$-83-83 TINE HOURS RTTRCHMENT 3.3E LERK RRTE 3
UCL VB. TIME TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEQT
.55
.45
.48 X:
.35 l-
.38 K
.25 O
.a8
\\
\\
.15
.18
.85 5-83-83 TIME HOURS RTTRCHMENT 3.3F LERK RRTE 8
UCL VS.
TINE TURKEY POINT PLRNT UNIT INTEGRRTED LERK RRTE TEST
SECTION 4 LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPE B AND C)
Attachments 4A and 4B, which
- follow, summarize the LLRT data which has been obtained from periodic testing performed since the last Type A Test.
Prerepair data is provided for surveillance testing performed in 1981/1982 and 1983.
These LLRTs were performed by pressurizing the listed penetrations with air and either measuring leakage across the containment isolation valves (Type C) or across the resilient seals (Type B).
The acceptance criteria for Type B and C testing is in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J.
The combined leakage rate for all penetrations and
- valves, subject to Type B and C tests, is less than 0.6 La.
The LLRTs performed in 1981/1982 and 1983 were well below the acceptance limit.
0
ATTACHMENT 4A TYPE B DATA
SUMMARY
~c Equipment
~Tcc cd As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
TYPE B DATA
SUMMARY
38 Electrical Penetration 39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange 0-Ring and Body
<40 0-Ring and Body
>50,000
<40 260 Tube tightened down 40 Equipment Hatch
/-
41 Personnel Air Lock 49 Emergency Air Lock 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body
/
0-Ring and Body 170 5,000
<35 290 5p 000
<35 Retested to verify con-tainment integrity Vent to atmosphere valve
- replaced, Hatch retested to verify leakage, No work performed after Type B testing Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)
TYPE 8 OATA
SUMMARY
<<c.
Equipment Tested As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
1-1 2 TYPE 8 OATA
SUMMARY
38 Electrical Penetration 39 Fuel Transfer Tube Flange 40 Equipment Hatch 41 Personnel Air Lock 49 Emergency Air Lock 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body 0-Ring and Body
<35
<40
<35
<40 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 4B TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
Penetration Nc Equipment/
Va Ives Tested As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
1 To RHR from Loop A Hot Leg MOV-751
( ISC)
<30
<30 5
PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7
PW to PRT and RCP Stand-pipes 8
PRZ Steam Samples 9
PRZ Liquid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head Sl to Loops 14 Letdown to Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger 16
SV-6385 (OSC)
CK-518 (ISC)
( ISC)
CV-519A (OSC)
CV-519B
( ISC)
CV-522A ( ISC)
CV-522B
( ISC)
CV-522C
( ISC CV-951
( ISC)
CV-956A (OSC)
CV-953
( ISC)
CV-956B (OSC)
CV-4658B (OSC)
PCV-4-1014 (OSC)
MOV-872 (OSC)
CV-200A ( ISC)
CV-2008
( ISC)
GV-200C ISC)
GV-204 OSC)
CK-312C
( ISC)
HCV-121 (OSC)
V-333 (OSC)
HV-4-2 (OSC)
PAHM-4-002A (OSC)
V-895V (OSC) 155
<40 1500 3600
<40 (combined) 100
<40 100
<40
<40
<40 300 120 (CV-200A)
(CV-2008)
(CV-200C) 150
<40 120 (HCV-121)
(V-333)
<40 (combined)
<40 155
<40 400 450
<40 100
<30 100
<40
<40
<40 300 120 (CV-200A)
(CV-2008)
(CV-200C) 150
<40
<30
( HCV-121 )
(V-333)
<40
<40 Seat lapped and cleaned Seat lapped and cleaned Retested to verify leakage V-333 repacked, Valves retested to verify leakage Retested to ver ify leakage Page 1 of 8
Qi ATTACHMENT 48 (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
Penetration nc Equipment/
Valves Tested As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Remarks 1
8 TYPE C DATA SUHMARY 19A Containment Spray A 198 Containment Spray 8
20 A and 8 Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT 24A Sea I
Wa te r I njec t I on to A RCP 248 Seal Water Injection to 8
RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument A) r Supply 30 Breathing Air 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return CK-890A (OSC)
HOV-880A (OSC)
CK-8908 (OSC)
HOV-8808(OSC)
CV-955A
( ISC)
CV-9558
( ISC)
SV-956C (OSC)
CV-2822 (OSC)
CV-2821 (OSC)
CK-298A ( ISC)
V"297A (OSC)
CK-2988 (ISC)
V-2978 (OSC)
CK"298C (ISC)
V-297C (OSC)
HOV-381 (OSC)
HOV-6386
( ISC)
CK"336
( ISC)
CV-2803 (OSC)
CK-340A
( ISC)
BA-201 CV-6165 CV-46598 (OSC)
CK-11-003
( ISC)
SV-2912 (OSC)
PAHM-001ApB (OSC) 10, 000
<40 4,000
<40
<40
<40
<40
<30
<30
<4O
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<4O 800 3,000 100 7,200
<40 200
<40 45,000
>54,000 (SV-2912)
( PAHH-001A, 8) 1,050
<40 150
<40
<40
<40
<40
<30
<30
<40
<40
<40
<4O
<40
<40
<40 800 90 100 1, 150
<30 200
<40 300 600 CK-890A seat was cleaned and lapped Retested to verify leakage CK-8908 seat was cleaned and
- lapped, Retested to verify leakage CK-336 and CK-340A cleaned and seats lapped CK-11-003 seat was cleaned, SV-2912 was replaced under PC/H 80-150, Insta I lation was reversed to ma inta in containment integrity Page 2 of'
ATTACHMENT 48 (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
~c Equipment/
Va Ives
~Tee ed As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
33 Containment Air Sample 34 Service Air 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment Purge Outlet 37 Spare 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 51 PACVs 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A
548 Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump 8
55 Accumulator Sampling 61A Spare 618 Deadweight Tester to PT SV-2913 (OSC)
SV-2911 (OSC)
CK-205 '( ISC)
V-204 (OSC)
HV-4"17 (OSC)
PV-2600 (OSC)
PV-2601
( ISC)
PV-2602 (OSC)
PV-2603
( ISC)
V-945E (OSC)
CK-10-569 (OSC)
HV-4-4 (OSC)
PAHM-4-0028 (OSC)
CV-4668A (OSC)
CV-46688 (OSC)
MOV-861A (OSC)
MOV-8618 (OSC)
CV-955C
( ISC)
CV-955D ISC)
CV-955E ISC)
CV-956D OSC)
Valve
'A'alve'C'OSC) 180 90
>52,000 450
<30
>50,000 (combined)
>52,000 (combined)
<30
<40
<40 1d500
<40 (combined)
<40 (combined)
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40 180 90 1, 100
<30
<30 6700 4,800
<30
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40 CK-205 and V-204 valve seats cleaned Valve seats adjusted Valve seats adjusted Valve lapped Page 3 of 8
ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
Penetration Nc Equipment/
Va Ives
~Tcc ed As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out 65B Containment A'ir Test Pressure 65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow CV-2819
( I SC)
CV-2826 (OSC)
Valve 'F'OSC)
Valve sGs (OSC) 2,500 150
>52, 000
<40
<40 150 150 300 80
<40 CV-2819 limit switch adjusted, CV-2826 retested to verify leakage Flanges removed to pres-surize and depressurize for ILRT, Retested after ILRT Retested after ILRT Retested after ILRT Page 4 of 8
ATTACHMENT 48 (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
~c Equipment/
Va Ives
~Tes cd As Found Leakage
~cc mic As Left Leakage JCCCIII i II Remarks 1
81 "1 2 TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
1 To RHR from Loop A Hot leg 5
PRT to Gas Analyzer 6 Nitrogen to PRT 7
PW to PRT and RCP Standpipes 8
PRZ Steam Samples 9
PRZ Liquid Samples 10 RCDT and PRT Vent and Nitrogen to RCDT 11 Alternate Low Head SI to Loops 14 Letdown to Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger 15 Charging to Regenerative Heat Exchanger 16
- PACVs, Hydrogen Remova I 17 SI Test Line 19A Containment Spray A MOV-751 (ISC)
GV-516 (OSC)
CK-518
( I SC)
( I SC)
CV-519A CV-519B CV-522A CV-522B GV-522C OSC ISC)
ISC)
ISC ISC)
CV-200A ISC)
CV-200B ISC)
CV-200C ISC)
CV-204 OSC CK-312C
( ISC)
HCV-121 (OSC)
V-333 (OSC)
HV-4-2 (OSC)
V-895V (OSC)
CK-890A (OSC)
MOV-880A (OSC)
CV-951
( ISC)
GV-956A (OSC)
CV-953 (ISC)
GV-9568 (OSC)
CV-4-46588 (OSC)
PCV-4-1014 (OSC).
MOV-872 (OSC) 50 0
0 (combined) 0
<30 0
<30 0
250 600 (CV-200A)
(CV-200B)
(CV-200C) 70 30 60
( HCV-121 )
(V-333) 75 42,500 0
50 0
0
<30 0
<30 0
250 600 (CV-200A)
CV-200B)
CV-200C) 70 30 60
( HCV-121 )
(V-333) 75 1,000 0
CK-890A valve seat cleaned and lapped Page 5 of 8
0
ATTACHMENT 4B (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
Penet rat ion
~o Equipment/
Va Ives
~Tcc cc As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
1-1 2 TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
19B Containment Spray B
20 A and B Hot Leg Sample 23 Containment Sump to WHT 24A Seal Water Injection to A RCP 24B Seal Water Injection to B RCP 24C Seal Water Injection to C RCP 25 RCP Seal Water Return 29 Instrument Air Supp,ly 30 Breathing Atr 31 RCDT to Gas Analyzer 32 Containment Air Sample Return 33 Containment Air Sample CK-890B (OSC)
MOV-880B(OSC)
CV-955A
( ISC)
CV-955B
( ISC)
SV-956C (OSC)
CV-2822 (OSC)
CV-2821 (OSC)
CK-298A
( ISC)
V-297A (OSC)
CK-2988
( ISC)
V"297B (OSC)
CK-298C
( ISC)
V"297C (OSC)
MOV-381 (OSC)
MOV-6386
( ISC)
CK-336
( ISC)
CV-2803 (OSC)
CK-340A
( ISC)
Blank Flange and V-BA-201 Blank Flange and CV-6165 CV-4659B (OSC)
CK-11-003
( ISC)
SV-2912 (OSC)
SV-2911 (OSC) 9p 000 0
0
<30 0
>52, 000 0
0 450 600 0
450 450
>52,000 2, 500 600 1, 700 0
0
<30 0
0 450 600 0
450 1, 020 1 p 500 CK-890B valve seat cleaned and lapped CV-2822 valve stroke adjusted and seat cleaned and lapped Tested between flange and va lve Tested between flange and va lve CK-11-003 valve seat cleaned; SV-2912 solenoid valve internals were replaced and seat cleaned SV-2911 and 2913 solenoid va lve interna Is were replaced Page 6 of 8
0
ATTACHMENT 4B
( Cont'
)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
~c Equipment/
Va Ives
~Tes cc As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
1-1 2 TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
34 Service Air 35 Containment Purge Inlet 36 Containment Purge Outlet 42 Nitrogen to Accumulators 47 Primary Water Supply to Wash Header 51 PACVs 52 RCDT Pump Discharge 54A Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump A
54B Containment Recirc Sump to RHR Pump B
55 Accumulator Sampl ing 61B Deadweight Tester to PT 63 Instrument Air Bleed 65A Containment Air Test Air In-Out 65B Containment Air Test Pressure CK-205
( ISC)
V-204 (OSC)
PV-2600 (OSC)
PV-2601
( ISC)
PV-2602 (OSC)
PV"2603
( ISC)
CV-855 (OSC)
V-945E (OSC)
CK-10-569 (OSC)
HV-4-4 (OSC)
PAHM-4-002B (OSC)
CV-4668A (OSC)
CV-4668B (OSC)
MOV-861A (OSC)
MOV-861B (OSC)
CV-955C ISC)
CV-9550
( ISC)
CV-955E ISC)'V-9560 OSC)
Valve 'C'OSC)
CV-2819
( ISC)
CV-2826 (OSC)
Valve 'F'OSC)
>52,000 120 28 000 (combined) 30,000 (combined)
>52'00 0 (combined) 0 (combined) 60 80 60 0
0 400 100 700 120 45
<30 60 80 60 0
0 400 100 CK-205 valve seat cleaned Valve seats adjusted Valve seats adJusted Valve seat cleaned and lapped Page 7 of 8
ATTACHMENT 48 (Cont'd)
TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
Penetration llc Equipment/
Va ives
~Tmc cd As Found Leakage
~cc min As Left Leakage
~cc min Rema rks 1
1-1 2 TYPE C DATA
SUMMARY
65C Containment Air Test Leakage Flow Valve 'G'OSC)
Page 8 of 8