ML17229A697

Annual Environ Radiological Operating Rept for 1997.

ML17229A697
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	12/31/1997
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17229A696	List: ML17229A695 ML17229A697
References
NUDOCS 9804220287
Download: ML17229A697 (91)

Text

1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 5. 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared by:

Reviewed by:

,9804220287 980415 PDR ADOCK 05000335 R PDR

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program TABLE 1 Annual Summary Deviations/Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection TABLE 1B Capabilities Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENTA Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and ATTACHMENTB Light Company's St. Lucie Site First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison ATTACHMENTC Program, 1997

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St. Lucie Unit 1 5.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the St.

Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Control 3/4.12.1.

Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

C. Surface water samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2

d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH).

Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

hnaLy~aLBesults provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period. Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 D.

A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Xahl~,

Summary..

No locations yielding a calculated dose or Jose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

The lnterlaboratory Comparison Program is being changed.

Prior to 1997, the Department of Health Laboratory, performing our analyses, participated in the EPA sponsored program. This program consisted of air filters, milk, and water samples. The results were reported in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM.

The EPA Interlaboratory Comparison program relative to nuclear power plant environmental monitoring programs was discontinued. The EPA program did continue, however, in support of the Safe Drinking Water Program; the State laboratory, being a Certified SDWP laboratory, continued to receive, and analyze, water samples.

Since 1990, the State Laboratory has participated in the Department of Energy's Interlaboratory Comparison Program ( the "DOE-QAP" program).

This program consists of air filters, water, soil, and vegetation.

For the reports covering calendar year 1997, and proposed for calendar year 1998, the results of participating in the DOE-QAP will be included with the results of the EPA water samples in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM. Note that the right most columns, QAP45 and QAP 46 Evaluation, are the result of the last intercomparison results for comparison to the most recent evaluation shown in the second from right column.

The future of both the EPA and DOE programs past the end of 1998 are uncertain. FPL is in the process of identifying a new suitable intercomparison program. The program will be described in the ODCM and the results will be incorporated in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM.

(3)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by St. Lucie Plant, ODCM. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.

Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable l-131 ~ Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preope rational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

3. Surface Water:

The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements. Tritium was

.reported as present in four of the weekly samples collected from Site H-15. The highest concentration was less than 3% of the reporting level specified by the ODCM, Table 3.12-2. No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected. Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.

(4)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 &. 2

4. Waterborne Sediment and Food Products:

The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.

5. Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. One of twelve control location samples exhibited a positive result for CS-137 at about 13% of the required LLD as listed in ODCM table 4.12-1. Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.

The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.

Lucie Units 1 &. 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

Location of Facility PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr

',',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility (County, State)

Docket No(s).

Reporting Period Page 8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)

All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance 5. Control Locations 106'.87 of Anal ses Performed Exposure Rate, Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e (102/102) 4.02 - 6.37 Direction NW-10 10 mi., NW Ran e 6.1 7 (4/4) 5.62 - 6.37 Mean (f) Ran e 5.09 (4/4) 4.55 - 5.51 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Name of Facility Location of Facility PATHWAY: AIRBORNE

',',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

(County, State)

SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO - Ci/M Reporting Period ~

Docket No(s).

Page Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)"

AII Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance 8c Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f) Ran e

'"I, 260 0.024 <MDA < MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.012 (201/208) H-34 0.013 (51/52) 0.012 (49/52) 0.001 - 0.026 0.5 mi ~, N 0.004 - 0.024 0.003 - 0.024 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20

'Be 0.0052 0.1230 (16/16) H-14 0.1275 (4/4) 0.1253 (4/4) 0.0914 - 0.1543 1 mi., SE 0.1120 - 0.1404 0.1024 - 0.1592 134CS 0.00069 <MDA < MDA 137CS 0.00066 <MDA < MDA 210Pb 0.0124 (16/16) H-14 0.0143 (4/4) 0.0137 (4/4) 0.0048 - 0.0186 1 mi., SE 0.0116 - 0.0177 0.0098 - 0.0216 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Location of Facility PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER

'UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER

',',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility (County, State)

Docket No(s).

Reporting Period Page Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)b All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance 5. Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f) Ran e Tritium, 64 230 318 (3/52) H-15 318 (3/52) 104 (1/12) 135 - 640 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 180 - 640 Gamma Isotopic, 64 60 331 (52/52) H-15 331 (52/52) 328 (12/12) 244 - 394 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 244 - 394 274 - 393 "Mn <MDA <MDA esFe <MDA <MDA 68Co <MDA <MDA

~Co <MDA <MDA 66Zn <MDA <MDA seZr-Nb <MDA <MDA 131I

<MDA <MDA 134CS <MDA <MDA

'"Cs <MDA <MDA 140Ba La <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

1 0

Location of Facility PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO- Ci/K, DRY

',',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility (County, State)

Docket No(s).

Reporting Period UanuaL Page 8 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ype All Indicator and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance 5. Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f)'an e Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 814 (2/2) H-15 814 (2/2) 268 (2/2) 292 - 1337 <1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 292 - 1337 257 - 280 33'Ra 49 336 (2/2) H-15 336 (2/2) 210 (2/2) 181 - 492 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 181 - 492 190 - 231 308 (1/2) H-15 308 (1/2) <MDA

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 6mi ~,S 3

Co <MDA <MDA

~Co 12 <MDA <MDA 134CS <MDA <MDA 137 CS 12 <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

0 Location of Facility PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO- Ci/K, WET Facility,',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of (County, State)

Docket No(s).

Reporting Period (f)'age 8

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance tk Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f) Ran e Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 1610 (2/2) H-15 1610 (2/2) 1530 (2/2) 1457 - 1764 <1 mi., 1457 - 1764 1437 - 1624 ENE/E/ESE 228Ra <MDA <MDA

'4Mn <MDA <MDA "Fe < MDA <MDA 58Co < MDA < MDA 80Co 19 < MDA < MDA 5Zn 17 < MDA < MDA 134CS < MDA <MDA 137( S < MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Page . 8 Location of Facility Facility, (County, State)

',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Docket No(s).

Reporting Period PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO- Ci/K, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)

All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance 5 Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f)'an e Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 2178 (2/2) H-15 2178 (2/2) 2842 (2/2) 1770 - 2585 <1 mi., 1770 - 2585 1680 - 4005 ENE/E/ESE "Mn < MDA <MDA "Fe 16 <MDA < MDA 58Co <MDA <MDA

~co 10 <MDA <MDA Zn 17 < MDA <MDA 134CS < MDA <MDA 137CS < MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Name of Location of Facility, ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Facility, Docket No(s).

Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION (f)'age UNITS: PICO- Ci/K, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance & Control Locations of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Ran e Direction Ran e Mean (f) Ran e Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 71 689 (24/24) H-52 748 (12/12) 552 (12/12) 458 - 1134 1 mi., S/SSE 474 - 1134 258 - 861 40K 2606 (24/24) 100 H-51 2641 (12/12) 2133 (12/12) 1488 - 4282 1 mi., N/NNW. 1733 - 4282 894 - 4281 131 I <MDA < MDA 134C

<MDA <MDA 137CS <MDA 11 (1/12)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Page 8 Location of Facility Facility, (County, State)

',

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Docket No(s).

Reporting Period The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).

C. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

Results were based upon the average net response of two TLDs. (Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Airborne; Radioiodine 131 5 Particulates Location: H-30, 2 miles W Dates: 08/04/97 to 08/12/97 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Description of Air sampling pump failed about 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> into the 190 hour0.0022 days <br />0.0528 hours <br />3.141534e-4 weeks <br />7.2295e-5 months <br /> Problem: sampling period.

Corrective Repaired sampling equipment, verified sampling equipment as Action: operable.

B) Pathway: Airborne; Radioiodine 131 8c Particulates Location: H-34, 0.5 miles N Dates: 08/12/97 to 08/18/97 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Description of Air sampling hose found disconnected at end of sample Problem: period. Evaluation of sampling filter material concluded virtually no sample collected.

Corrective Repaired sampling equipment, verified sampling equipment as Action: operable.

C) Pathway: Direct Exposure Locations: W-2, 2 miles W and SSE-5, 5 miles SSE Dates: 09/11/97 to 12/05/97 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Description of TLD's missing when collection was attempted.

Problem:

Corrective New TLD's deployed near original locations.

Action:

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONlVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8a 2 ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/97 - 12/31/97 A) Pathway: Airborne; Radioiodine 131 5. Particulates Location: H-30, 2 miles W Cause: Sampling equipment failure lead to small sample size.

LLD Achieved: 0.017 versus required 0.01 pCi/m B) Pathway: Airborne; Radioiodine 131 5 Particulates Locations: H-08, 6 miles WNW and H-12, 12 miles S Cause: Short sampling period due to scheduling error.

LLD Achieved: H-08: 0.011 v. required 0.01 pCi/m H-12: 0.018 v. required 0.01 pCi/m

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONlVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 LAND USE CENSUS 7/97 Milk (c) 7/97 7/97 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d) 0 (e)

NNE ENE ESE SE 1.5/141 (g)

SSE 3.3/1 53 (g) 3.2/191 SSW 2.2/213 SW 1.9/236 WSW 1.9/245 (h)

.W 1.9/260 WNW 2.3/281 NW 3.5/304 NNW L (g)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 L 2 XMLE2 LAND USE CENSUS All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant.

The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.

Potential milk animal locations. All locations specified have been verified to be nai producing milk for human consumption.

Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area .

L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance Dascripiian SSE 1.8/149 Fire Station NNW 2.8/348 A new community is being developed, occupancy not expected until mid 1998.

SE 1.1/132 Lifeguard station at beach Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St.

Lucie Plant.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 FIGURE M SITE AREA MAP & ENVIRONMENTALSAMPLE LOCATIONS FPt.'s Property Vne Q lq Ne 1 Blind

~$ pg~ Af~@pq Creek j u

EC LU 0

Q" WNW-2 H34 D ~A"

-"

EXCLUSlON AREA (0.97 ml)

ANO LOW W2 POPULATlON ZONE(1 ml)

NOTES:

+

1) L-Vquld Radwaste Release Point

2) Due to the scale ot the Rgure the Exclusion Area Radius (OAV'mge) and the Low Population Zone (1 mlle) area shown as being the same atza SE-

'e O

m f~g'-'+7 FPL's Property 5pg3 Vne HH14 H WSW-2 H52

%4 (C-200A. WPG)

SCALE IN MlLES

1997 f

ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL NVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 FIGURE 1-2 ENVIRONMENTALSAMPLE LOCATIONS 10 MILES HW.10 WNW-10 EOF W-1 g '~@~~)

C

~,5 rPr,.;4h ~ 4; WSW4 ~k @

WSW-10 SW-10 ting

~~r

%4f4fe 4@4, 4

r h~a" SS E-10';.

SSW '10 H12

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 Page 1 of 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Approximate Location Direction Distance

~arne %acta@ smiles)

N-1 N 1 A1A, North of Blind Creek NNW-5 NNW 5 South of Pete Stone Creek NNW-10 NNW 9 Coast Guard Station NW-5 NW 6 Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.

NW-10 NW 10 S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 WNW-2 WNW 3 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.

WNW-5 WNW 5 U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 WNW-10 WNW 10 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike W-2 W 2 7609 Indian River Drive W-5 W 5 Oleander and Sager Street W-10 W 9 Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 WSW-2 WSW 2 8503 Indian River Dr.

WSW-5 WSW 5 Prima Vista at Yacht Club WSW-10 WSW 10 Del Rio at Davis Street SW-2 SW 2 9207 Indian River Drive SW-5 SW 5 U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.

SW-10 SW 10 Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.

SSW-2 SSW 3 10307 Indian River Drive SSW-5 SSW 6 U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.

SSW-10 SSW 8 Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.

S-5 S 5 13179 Indian River Drive S-10 S 10 U.S. 1 at S.R. 714 S/SSE-10 SSE 10 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane SSE-5 SSE 5 Entrance to Nettles Island SSE-10 SSE 10 Elliot Museum SE-1 SE 1 South of Cooling Canal CaatraL H-32 NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Meme Nectar Oniles) Description H-08 WNW FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.

H-14 SE On-Site, Near South Property Line H-30 W Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 0.5 On-Site at Meteorology Tower H-12 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8a 2 Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: H-15 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Mama Hector smiles H-51 ENE/E/SSE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Caniral H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance

~arne Deciar Umilesl H-1 5 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance

~arne Daatax ~miles)

H-1 5 ENE/E/ESE Ocean Side, Vicinity of St. Lucie Plant H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance

~arne Aaatar smiles) Descriptian H-51 N/NNW Off-site Near North Property Line H-52 S/SSE Off-site Near South Property Line Central:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE 1997 First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997

RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLOMDAPOWER AND LIGHT'S ST. LUCIE SITE FIRST QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1997 Number of CaJMihn Eragucan Gamp'7

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27

2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 60 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 60

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 12 Monthly 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 2

4. Ingestion

~

4.a. Fish and Invertebra tes 4.a.l. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 177 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as less than' Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

Sample Deployment 12-Dec-96 Site Collection 13-Mar-97 N-1 4.55 + 0.37 NNW-5 4.41 + 0.36 NNW-10 4.45 + 0.36 NW-5 4.97 + 0.40 NW-10 5.62 + 0.44 WNW-2 4.80 + 0.39 WNW-5 4.69 + 0.38 WNW-10 4.88 + 0.39 W-2 6.08 + 0.48 W-5 5.24 + 0.42 W-10 4.99 + 0.40 WSW-2 4.82 + 0.39 WSW-5 4.86 + 0.39 WSW-10 4.12 + 0;34 SW-2 4.36 + 0.36 SW-5 5.77 + 0.45 SW-10 4.65 & 0.38

'SSW-2 4.44 + 0.36 SSW-5 5.40 + 0.43 SSW-10 5.05 + 0.40 S-5 4.96 6 0.40 S-10 4.83 & 0.38 S/SSE-10 4.48 + 0.36 SSE-5 4.64 + 0.37 SSE-10 4.56 & 0.37 SE-1 4.37 + 0.36 H-32 5.34 + 0.42

W Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 06-Jan-97 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 15-Jan-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22-Jan-97 <0.01 29-Jan-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 03-Feb-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 13-Feb-97 <0.02 <0.02 19-Feb-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 25-Feb-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Mar-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 <0.03 12-MK-97 17-MK-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 26-Mar-97 <0.01

2 AIR Sam le Site Collection H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Date 06-Jan-97 0.002 w 0.002 0.004 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002 0.001 w 0.001 0.004+ 0.002 15-Jan-97 0.009 ~ 0.002 0.006 a 0.001 0.009 a 0.002 0.006 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 22-Jan-97 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.013 a 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.016 ~ 0.002 29-Jan-97 0.010 R 0.002 0.011 2 0.002 0.014 R 0.002 0.010 R 0.002 0.012 R 0.002 03-Feb-97 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.003+ 0.002 0.008 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 13-Feb-97 0.010 a 0.002 0.008 ~ 0,002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.003 ~ 0.001 0.009 a 0.002 19-Feb-97 0.007 a 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.004 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 25-Feb-97 0,010 ~ 0.002 0.004 ~ 0.002 0.008 s 0.002 0.001 ~ 0.002 0.009 a 0.002 04-Mar-97 0.006+ 0.002 0.006 W 0.002 0.008+ 0.002 0.007 ~ 0.002 0.007 ~ 0.002 12-Mar-97 0.012 2 0.002 0,012 w 0.002 0.011 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002 0.012 w 0.002 17-Mar-97 0.019~0.003 0.017~0.002 0.016~0.002 0.013~0.002 0.017+0.002 26-Mar-97 0,014 a 0.002

~ ~ 0.012 a 0.002

~ ~ 0:010 a 0.002

~ 0.014 ~ 0.002

~ ~ 0.013 a 0.002 Mean: 0.010 a 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.010 ~ 0.001 0.006 ~ 0.001 0.011+ 0.001 2.2 P RTI A E A TERLY MP ITE i m'am

~li g Ra2 G~I4 G~I7 D=2JQ H08 0. 1408 a 0,0099 <0.0173 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0115 w 0.0029 H12 0.1265 w 0.0124 <0.0149 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0118 R 0.0027 H14 0.1196 w 0.0108 <0.0165 <0.0009 <0.0008 0.0128 w 0.0030 H30 0.0940 w 0.0096 <0.0174 <0.0011 <0.0007 0.0077 w 0 .0025 H34 0.1384 2 0.0105 <0.0166 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0134 w 0.0025

Sample

~i Collection

~t HM ME M MQ Zr-95 Hh='5 (A)

L13l C.'M C~ Ba-140 L;>~4 (B)

H15 07-Jan-97 <140 330 + 17 <2 <2 <3 <2 <4 14-Jan-97 <140 350+ 39 <4 <4 <8 <5 <5 22-Jan-97 <141 301 + 22 <2 <5 <6 <3 28-Jan-97 <141 387 + 33 <3 <4 <8 <5 <4 <3 04-Feb-97 <143 276+ 36 <4 <4 <7 <4 <8 <4 <4 <6 13-Feb-97 <143 335 + 36 <9 <4 <9 <5 <6 <5 <4 <6 18-Feb-97 <145 341 + 28 <2 <3 <5 <5 <3 <6 25-Feb-97 <144 3S1 + 35 <3 <3 <8 <4 <5 <6 03-Mar-97 <145 392 + 3S <4 <8 <5 <8 <7 <9 <4 <5 <6 11-Mar-97 <145 352 + 34 <4 <7 <7 <6 <4 <4 <5 17-Mar-97 135 + 32 374 + 26 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <4 27-Mar-97 <140 373 + 32 <3 <3 <4 <7 <7 <3 <4 <3 <9 H59 07-Jan-97 104 + 45 303 + 32 <4 <4 <10 <5 <7 <4 <5 04-Feb-97 <143 351+ 17 <2 <2 <3 <2 <3 . <3 <3 03-Mar-97 <145 296 + 35 <4 <4 <9 <3 <7 <10 <4 <4 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

Sample H15 Collection DaLe 26-Feb-97

/k

<69 we'8 292 + 43 <6 <6 <6 Zh=El

<572 En&i 181 + 10 U23E

<305 H59 2S-Feb-97 <74 257 + 44 <7 <6 <9 <677 231 & 9 <361 4 1 w w Sample Collection ~4 hhM ~ ~ C~ ~ C.'~1 CsKB . Jh~2 ZW28 H15 2S-Feb-97 1764 + 162 <19 <19 <41 <23 <45 <17 <22 <361 <85 H59 26-Feb-97 1437 + 161 <15 <18 <40 <26 <45 <15 <17 <3S3 <113 W W Sample Collection Mate

~4 hid ME L2 Mdl ~ GsJZ M2 ZQZ6 MK H15 26-Feb-97 1770+ 179 <16 <18 <41 <18 <44 <17 <22 <345 H59 2S-Feb-97 1680 + 185 <14 <15 <34 <21 <42 <17 <22 <3S1

i

.FAF V / w Sample Collection Site Date BQ-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 H51 '07-Jan-97 582 + 54 2550 + 117 <9 <9 <9 <556 <203 04-Feb-97 562+58 2192+104 <14 <10 <10 <574 <215 04-Mar-97 669 + 55 2457 + 108 <17 <8 <8 <514 <177 H52 07-Jan-97 474 + 51 2487 + 116 <10 <9 <506 <176 04-Feb-97 577 s 60 1739 + 110 <11 <ll <11 <616 <221 04-Mar-97 1134 + 2S 2324 + 4S <S <4 480 + 107 <81 H59 07-Jan-97 763+54 1473+97 <10 <9 <9 <547 <227 04-Feb-97 258 + 47 2070 + 112 <14 <11 <12 <495 <198 04-Mar-97 453 + 48 1918 + 93 <17 <9 <8 <475 <171

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE PLANT SECOND QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1997 Number of Cdhadan Zrcqucnm 5 mph'

~ Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27

2. Airborne 2.a.'ir Iodines Weekly 65 2.b; Air Particulates Weekly 65

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 12 Monthly 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 181 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ggi significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

Sample Deployment 13-Mar-97 Site Collection 10-Jun-97 N-1 4.82 & 0.37 NNW-5 4.57 + 0.35 NNW-10 4.48 + 0.34 NW-5 4.68 + 0.36 NW-10 6.37 + 0.47 WNW-2 4.81 + 0.36 WNW-5 4.66 &,0.35 WNW-10 5.11 + 0.39 W-2 5.83 & 0.43 W-5 5,07 + 0.38

'-10 5.11 + 0.38 WSW-2 4.70 + 0.36 WSW-5 4.53 + 0.34 WSW-10 4.02 + 0.31 SW-2 4.63 & 0.35 SW-5 5.50 + 0.41 SW-10 4.56 + 0.35 SSW-2 4.53 + 0.34 SSW-5 4.85 & 0.37 SSW-10 4.94 + 0.37 S-5 4.62 + 0.35 S-10 4.66 + 0.35 S/SSE-10 4.07 + 0.31 SSE-5 4.48 + 0.35 SSE-10 4.30 + 0.33 SE-1 4.27 & 0.33 H-32 4.55 + 0.35

'

0

Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-Apr-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 08-Apr-97 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 15-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 22-Apr-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 29-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 05-May-97 <0.02 <0.01 '0.02 <0.02 <0.01 14-May-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 20-May-97 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 27-May-97 <0.01 <0,01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 03-Jun-97 <0.01 .. <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 10-Jun-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 18-Jun-97 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 24-Jun-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Sample Site Collection HOS H12 H14 H30 H34 Date 01-Apr-97 0.021 + 0.003 0.016 + 0.003 0.019 + 0.003 0.012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 08-Apr-97 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.01'4 a 0.002 0.012 +,0.002 0.01S + 0.003 15-Apr-97 0.01S+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.016+0.003 0.017+0.002 '0.017 + 0.002 22-Apr-97 0.017+0.002 0.018'+0.003 0.015+0.002 0.022+0.003 0.014+0.002 29-Apr-97 0.017 + 0.003 0.009 ~ 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.014 a 0.002 05-May-97 0.016 + 0.003 0.016 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.003 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 14-May-97 0.008 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 20-May-97 0.013 + 0.003 0.015 + 0.003 0.011 + 0,003 0.015 + 0.003 0.012 + 0.003 27-May-97 0.013 + 0.002 0.014.+ 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 03-Jun-97 0.007 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 10-Jun-97 0.005 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 18-Jun-97 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.004+0.002 0.007+0.002 24-Jun-97 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.014+0.002 0:013+0.002 Mean: 0.013.+ 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 Sampl~~e P~

HOS 0.1222 4. 0.0091 <0.0160 <0.0009 <0.0008 0.0146 & 0.0030 H12 0.1131 & 0.0105 <0.0163 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0115 & 0.0028 H14 0.1404* 0.0102 <0.0173 <0.0009 <0.0007 0.0152 & 0.0033 H30 0.1446 & 0.0095 <0.0167 <0.0011 <0.0007 0.0124 & 0.0029 H34 0.1280 & 0.0092 <0.0179 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0130 + 0.0031

a RF FW F - i/

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 K4L Ha%4. ME Ll31 CUB MZ J a-~4 (A) (B)

H15 02-Apr-97 <146 360 + 39 <3 <4 <8 <5 <6 . <6 <4 <4 <6 OS-Apr-97 <140 2S2 + 40 <3 <4 <7 <5 <9 <7 <5 <4 <4 <6 14-Apr-97 <140 361 + 35 <4 <3 <5 <9 <5 <5 <5 <4 <5 21-Apr-97 640+28 374+28 <3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <6 <3 <3 <4 <6 29-Apr-97 <143 319 + 34 <4 <3 <8 <4 . <9 <7 <4 <4 <6 06-May-97 180 + 24 3S4 + 37 <3 <4 <7 <5 <6 <7 <5 <3 <4 <5 15-May-97 <147 310+ 34 <4 <4 <6 <5 <8 <7 <6 <4 <4 <5 19-May-97 <143 270 + 31 <3 <4 <8 <5 <8 <7 <4 <4 <4 28-May-97 <143 298 + 32 <4 <5 <6 <3 <4 <4 <10 03-Jun-97 <139 367 + 31 <4 <8 <4 <8 <7 <5 <4 <5 <6 10-Jun-97 <139 279 + 2S <4 <3 <7 <5 <6 <5 <4 <4 <6 18-Jun-97 <147 346+ 35 <3 <3 <7 <5 <6 <6 <4 <4 <9 25-Jun-97 <147 316 + 34 <4 <4 <7 <4 <7, <7 <5 <4 <4 <4 H59 15-Apr-97 <140 278 + 35 <4 <4 <7 <4 <10 <7 <4 <4 <5 <6 06-May-97 <144 386 + 33 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <6 <6 <4 <3 <5 04-Jun-97 <139 360 + 34 <4 <4 <7 <5 <6 <7 <5 <4 <5 <6 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parerit or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

D e we'ample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 H51 15-Apr-97 710 + 46 1880 + 8S <7 <8 <8 <458 <167 06-May-97 553 + 55 2384 & 134 <11 <12 <10 <684 <234 04-Jun-97 612 + 47 3004 + 104 <7 <8 <416 <158 H52 14-Apr-97 810 + 51 4014 + 129 .

<9 <9 <8 <509 <192 06-May-97 773 + 59 3344 + 150 <9 <11 <9 <599 <244 04-Jun-97 662 + 43 14SS + S3 <7

" . <8 <416 <164 H59 15-Apr-97 640 + 47 2844 + 110 <7 <9 <8 <417 <156 06-May-97 554 + 49 894 + 80 <10 <10 <10 <621 <209 04-Jun-97 602 + 54 -

1901 + 93 <7 <9 <467 <175

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OP RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE PLANT THIRD QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1997 Number of Calhaiian Zrc@mm Smnpha

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27

2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 69 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 69

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 14 Monthly 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 197 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are lan significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

I 1

0

Sample Deployment 10-Jun-97 Site Collection 11-Sep-97 N-1 4.74 + 0.37 NNW-5 4.46 + 0.35 NNW-10 5.09 + 0.39 NW-5 4.76 & 0.37 NW-10 6.36 + 0.49 WNW-2 4.82 + 0.38 WNW-5 4.76 + 0.37 WNW-10 4.87 & 0.38 W-2 5.90 + 0.45 W-5 5.19 + OAO W-10 4.87 + 0.38 WSW-2 4.66 & 0.37 WSW-5 4.77 + 0.37 WSW-10 4.08 + 0.33 SW-2 4.65 + 0.36 SW-5 5.57 + 0.43 SW-10 4.81 + 0.38 SSW-2 4.77 + 0.37 SSW-5 5.05 + 5.05 SSW-10 4.94 + 0.39 S-5 4.72 & 0.37 S-10 4.91 + 0.39 S/SSE-10 4.61 + 0.37 SSE-5 4.79 + 0.37 SSE-10 4.76 & 0.38 SE-1 4.30 + 0.34 H-32 4.96 & 0.38

Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-Jul-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 10-Jul-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 14-Jul-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 23-Jul-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 29-Jul-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Aug-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02 <0.02 <0.02 12-Aug-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.07 (A) <0.02 18-Aug-97 <0,01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (B) 25-Aug-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Sep-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 11-Sep-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 15-Sep-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 26-Sep-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0,01 <0.01 29-Sep-97 <0.04 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 (A) The air pump was not functioning at the time of collection. Ne estimate the run time was 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> out of 190 during the sampling period.

(B) The air hose was not connected at time of sample collection. Due to the condition of the particulate filter, we estimate there was no sample collection.

Collection H08 H12 H14'30 H34 01-Jul-97 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011+ 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 10-Jul-97 0.015 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.010 0.002 14-Jul-97 0.011 0.003 <0.008 0.009 0.003 0.008 0,003 0.010 0.003 23-Jul-97 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.002 29-Jul-97 0,010 a 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 04-Aug-97 0.004+ 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 0.007 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 12-Aug-97 0.008 w 0.002 0.007 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002 <0.017 (A) 0.009 ~ 0.002 18-Ailg 97 0 006 w 0 002 0.007 w 0 002 <0.007 0 007 w 0.002 . (B) 25-Aug-97 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.006 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 04-Sep-97 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 11-Sep-97 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.014 ~ 0.002 15-Sep-97 0.008 ~ 0.003 <0.008 0.009 ~ 0.003 0.010+ 0.003 0.008 ~ 0.003 26-Sep-97 0.011 ~ 0.001 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.015 s 0.002 29-Sep-97 <0.011 (C) <0.018 (C) <0.008 <0.010 0.011 ~ 0.003 Mean: <0.010 <0.011 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 ~ 0.001 (A) The air pump was not functioning at the time of collection. We estimate the run time was 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> out of 190 during the sampling period.

(B) The air hose was not connected at time of sample collection. Due to the condition of the particulate filter, we estimate there was no sample collection.

(C) The volume for this sample was low due to a short sampling period (3 days).

QM~ CM H08 0.0914 w 0.0083 <0.0177 -<0.0010 <0.0009 0.0109 w 0.0024 H12 0.1024 w 0.0085 <0.0178 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0098 w 0.0024 H14 0.1120 w 0.0091 <0.0145 <0.0011 <0.0008 0.0116 w 0.0030 H30 0.1015 w 0.0098 <0.0174 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0048 w 0.0038 H34 0.1007 w 0.0089 <0.0168 <0.0009 <0.0010 0.0110 ~ 0.0031

a R Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140

~e ~h %3=3 hh<4 QHE L131 ~B CzJ32 j a144l (A) (B)

H15 01-Jul-97 <149 341 a 30 <4 <4 <10 <5 <9 <4 <5 <5 10-Jul-97 <149 288 + 33 <4 <3 <8 <5 <6 <7 <5 <4 <5 <5 14-Jul-97 <148 328 + 27 <3 <3 <6 <4 <6 <5 <4 23-Jul-97 <147 316 + 28 <3 <3 <7 <4 <6 <5 <4 <4 29-Jul-97 <147 344 + 30 <4 <4 <6 <6 <9 <7 <5 <5 04-Aug-97 <153 316 + 35 <4 <4 <5 <7 <8 <8 <4 <4 <5 12-Aug-97 <153 244 + 36 <4 '3 <9 <5 <8 <7 <4 <4 <4 18-Aug-97 <147 267 + 34 <3 <4 <4 <9 <7 <4 <4 <4 25-Aug-97 <147 295 + 37 <4 <4 <8 <8 <6 <5 <5 <4 04-Sep-97 <151 351+ 37 <4 <3 <8 <5 <9 <8 <6 <4 <6 11-Sep-97 <151 304 + 33 <4 <3 <6 <5 <8 <6 <4 <4 <9 15-Sep-97 <151 371 + 31 <3 <3 <5 <7 <6 <4 <4 <8 25-Sep-97 <166 386 + 35 <5 <4 <5 <8 <7 <6 <6 29-Sep-97 <166 245 + 32 <3 <4 <6 <5 <8 <6 <4 <4 <9 H59 02-Jul-97 <149 393 + 37 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <8 <9 <4 <4 05-Aug-97 <153 322 + 34 <4 <5 <8 <5 <7 <6 <4 <4 04-Sep-97 <151 338 + 17 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 <2

-

(A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

W 1 Sample Collection CM 25219 En226 Ih232 LGk H15 18-Aug-97 <98 1337+ 77 <10 <11 <15 <10 <958 492 + 14 308 + 17 <830 H59 18-Aug-97 '87 280 + 48 <6 <9 <8 <9 <656 190+ 9 <46 <380 W W Sample Collection

~h ~4 hf~ ~~ CnE ~ Cs=LB GsJZl Jh=226. B~ZL H15 30-JUI-97 1457 + 172 <20 <22 <39 <30 <47 <24 <24 <394 <127 H59 15-Sep-97 1624+ 195 <15 <19 <37 <24 <34 <25 <18 <400 <108 W W Sample

Collection

~h

~4 hire% QdE LS M8 ~ M2 Ml LQ26. 2428 H15 30-Jul-97 2585 + 212 <17 <21 <49 <33 <42 <25 <29 <332 <99 H59 30-Jul-97 4005 + 173 <14 <15 <31 <23 <34 <17 <17 <257 <65

I -B W Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Other H51 02-Jul-97 578 + 23 2817 + 56 <7 <4 <4 <234 <88 05-Aug-97 458 + 54 1733 + 105 <11 <9 <13 <588 <199 04-Sep-97 824 + 63 4282 + 153 <13 <11 <10 <565 <218 H52 02-Jul-97 712+64 3538+140 <16 <10 <10 <542 -<202 05-Aug-97 620+56 2233+120 <10 <12 <11 <513 <211 Pb-212: 3456 + 677 04-Sep-97 596 + 47 3218 + 142 <10 <11 <10 <556 <223 H59 02-Jul-97 566 + 60 2355 + 107 <15 <9 <9 <516 <193 05-Aug-97 658 + 59 1312 + 90 <13 <9 11+5 <481 <201 04-Sep-97 453 + 51 2637 + 126 <9 <10 <11 <476 <223

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE PLANT FOURTH QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

0 SL QR97-4 ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1997 Number of Snmpha

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 25

2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 65 2,b. Air Particulates Weekly 65

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Broad Leaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 180 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

1 of 13

SL QR97-4 DIRE TRADI D- Rh r Sample Deployment 11-Sep-97 Sample Deployment 11-Sep-97 Site Collection 05-Dec-97 Site Collection 05-Dec-97 N-1 4.79 a 0.37 SW-2 4.55+ 0.35 SW-5 5.83 ~ OA4 NNW-5 4.63 w 0.36 SW-10 5.04 ~ 0.39 NNW-10 5,22+ 0.40 SSW-2 4.73 w 0.36 NW-5 4.98+ 0.38 SSW-5 5.09 a 0.39 NW-10 6.32 w 0.48 SSW-10 5.16 ~ 0.40 WI'AV-2 5.00 a 0.38 S-5 4.76 w 0.37 Wt'Ail-5 5.06+ 0.39 S-10 5.13 ~ 0.39 WNW-10 5.18 ~ 0.40 S/SSE-10 4.51 w 0.35 W-2 Mjssjno (A)

W-5 5.42 w 0.41 SSE-5 Missing (A)

W-10 5.09 a 0.39 SSE-10 4.62+ 0.36 WSW-2 4.82 w 0.37 SE-1 4.43 ~ 0.35 WSW-5 5.00 R 0.38 WSW-10 4.50 ~ 0.35 H-32 5.51 + 0.42 SW-2 4.55 ~ 0.35 SW-5 5.83 ~ OA4 SW-10 5.04 ~ 0.39 (A) The tld's for sites W-2 and SSE-5 were missing when collection was attempted. New tld's were deployed near original locations.

2of 13

SL QR97-4 Sample Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 08-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 16-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 20-Oct-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 27-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-Nov-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-Nov-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 17-Nov-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 24-Nov-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Ol-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 15-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 22-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 29-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 3 of13

SL QR97-4 2 1 AIR PA A E Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 08-Oct-97 0,026 ~ 0,002 0.024 ~ 0.002 0.020 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.019+ 0.002 16-Oct-97 0.015 a 0.002 0.021 a 0.002 0.022 a 0.002, 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 20-Oct-97 0.008 a 0.003 0.007 ~ 0.003 0.014+ 0.003 <0.009 0.010 a 0.003 27-Oct-97 0.021 a 0.003 0.019 a 0.002 0.013 a 0.002 0.022 a 0,002 0,015 ~ 0.002 03-Nov-97 0.014 ~ 0,002 0.017 a 0.002 0,010 a 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.014 a 0.002 12-Nov-97 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.021 ~ 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 0.018 a 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 17-Nov-97 0.017 ~ 0.003 0.018+ 0.003 0.018 a 0.003 0.020 ~ 0.003 0.024 ~ 0.003 24-Nov-97 0.019 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 01-Dec-97 0.016+ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.016 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 08-Dec-97 0.016 ~ 0.002 0.020 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.021+ 0.002 15-Dec-97 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 22-Dec-97 0.020 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.018 s 0.002 0.015 s 0.002 0.016 a 0.002 29-Dec-97 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.006 ~ 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 Mean: 0.016 ~ 0.001 0.017 ~ 0.001 0.016 ~ 0.001 <0.015 0.016 w 0.001 2..2. AIR PARTI LATE A MA ANALY I F ARTERLY MP E i m~

~m1~ia K-4 M4 M3Z Eh=2&I H08 0.1543 w 0.0105 <0.0195 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0077 w 0.0027 H12 0.1592 w 0.0103 <0.0199 <0.0010 <0.0009 0.0216 w 0.0034 H14 0.1379 w 0.0100 <0.0175 <0.0009 <0.0007 0.0177 w 0.0031 H30 0.1132 w 0.0105 <0.0142 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0151 2 0.0027 H34 0.1295 2 0.0103 <0.0186 <0.0008 <0.0006 0.0186 w 0.0027 4of 13

SLQ -4 W

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140

~h hfdf CQE L131 QM CalXl La=HQ (A) (B)

H15 08-Oct-97 <145 298 + 34 <3 <3 <7 <4 <S <7 <S <4 <4 <5 15-Oct-97 <145 326 + 12 <1 <1 <2 <1 <3 <2 <1 20-Oct-97 <144 313 + 33 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <5 <4 <8 27-Oct-97 <144 325 + 33 <3 <3 <6 <4 <9 03-Nov-97 <152 331 + 34 <3 <4 <7 <4 <7 <6 <4 <4 <5 <6 12-Nov-97 <151 311 + 32 <4 <3 <7 <5 <7 <7 <4 <4 17-Nov-97 <151 394 + 32 <3 <3 <6 <4 <8 . <6 <4 <4 <6 24-Nov-97 <151 312 + 35 <3 <5 <S <4 <10 <6 <8 <4 <5 <5 01-Dec-97 <145 340 + 36 <4 <3 <8 <4 <9 <6 <5 <4 08-Dec-97 <145 351 + 14 <1 <1 <3 15-Dec-97 <145 307 + 31 <4 <4 .<S <5 <8 <7 <6 <5 <4 22-Dec-97 <145 309 + 34 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <6 <4 <4 <8 29-Dec-97 <135 352 + 31 <3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <8 H59 15-Oct-97 <145 337+ 34 <4 <4 <7 <4 <9 <7 <6 <5 04-Nov-97 <152 274 + 31 <4 <3 <9 <4 <8 <6 <5 <4 <4 <5 05-Dec-97 <145 303 + 34 <4 <5 <9 <4 <10 <6 <5 <5 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

5 of 13

SLQ -4 Sample Collection 1'-'2 IL4Q ME C~ Q-L8 Q-132 EHJ2 EQZ6 Xh232 LL23E These samples were previously collected.

e wei Sample Collection

~)~ie hire.k ME ~ 6=69 ~ Q-12 Q-1Z ~@2'a-222 These samples were previously collected.

w we h Sample Collection

~i~e

~4 he% ME M Mdl ~ Q=E4 Q=IZ ~26 34228 These samples were previously collected.

6 of 13

SLQ -4 V wtwi Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 KAO I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Other H51 15-Oct-97 609 & 44 2902+ 106 <9 <8 <436 <167 04-Nov-97 788 + 66 2144 + 118 <9 <9 <10 <1259 <230 05-Dec-97 609 + 48 3344 + 123 <11 <8 <570 <168 H52 15-Oct-97 561 + 49 2713 + 109 <10 <8 <6 <521 <174 04-Nov-97 968 + 64 2153 + 115 <9 <694 <229 05-Dec-97 1092 + 64 1602 + 84 <10 <9 <8 <532 <183 H59 15-Oct-97 861 + 64 4281 + 163 <11 <12 <10 <670 <238 04-Nov-97 390 + 50 1082 + 87 <10 <540 <207 05-Dec-97 432 + 55 2824 + 111 <10 <10 <8 <496 <180 7 of 13

1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1997

i

~ FLORIDA DEPT'F HEALTH EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1997 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level WATER Co-60 06 06 97 18 pCi/L 0.118 18.67 0.23 WATER Zn-65 06 06 97 100 pCi/L 0.236 104.33 0.75 WATER Cs-134 06 06 97 22 pCi/L 0.236 21.33 -0.23 WATER Cs-137 06 06 97 49 pCi/L 0.118 52.67 1.27 WATER Ba-133 06 06, 97 25 pCi/L 0.354 23.67 -0.46 WATER Sr-89 01 17 97 12 pCi/L 0.000 5.00 -2.42 WATER Sr-90 01 17 97 25 pCi/L 0.473 21.33 -1.27 WATER 'lpha 31 97

'1 5.2 pci/L 0.177 6.47 0.44 WATER Beta 01 31 97 14. 7 pCi/L 0.319 17.90 1.11 WATER I-131 02 07 97 86 pCi/L 0.131 83.67 -0.45 WATER H-3 03 07 97 7900 pCi/L 0.043 7332.33 -1.24 NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P.- 0. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

FLORIDA DEPT OF HEALTH EPA ZNTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1997 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level WATER Alpha 07 18 97 3.1 pC3./L 0.142 4.70 0.55 WATER Alpha 10 31 '97 14. 7 pCi/L 0.177 7.37 -2.54 WATER Beta 07 18 97 15.1 pCi/L 0.071 17.17 0.72 WATER Beta 10 31 97 48.9 pCi/L 0.354 53 ..40 1.56 WATER Co-60 11 07 97 27 pci/L 0.118 28.33 0.46 WATER WATER Zn-65 Ba-133 ll 11 07 07 97 97 75 99 pCi/L pCi/L 0.222 0.177 80.33 92.33 1.15

-1.15 WATER WATER Cs-134 Cs-137 ll 11 07 07 97 97 10 74 pCi/L pCi/L 0.000 0.118 10.00 77.67 0.00 1.27 WATER H-3 08 08 97 11010 pCi/L 0.519 10485.00 -0.83 WATER I-131 09 19 97 10 pc3./L 0.295 11.33 0.38 WATER Sr-89 07 11 97 44 pCi/L . 0.354 36.00 2 ~ 77 WATER Sr-90 07 11 97 16 pCi/L 0.236 13.00 -1. 04 NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Xntercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet.

been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

IB e DLlH kNV RHDIHl JUN C IRL I-ax:4UC-Z9/-ZU8> i-eb '-'87'jj'~l'. 1P'18 EML 591 QAP 9703 July 1,1997 QAP 46 R ults by Laboratory Pl ere.h.

Lab: FL Florida Dept of Health & Rehab. S rv., Orlando No. Radio- Reported Reported E L EMl.

Test nuclide Value QAP 45 Error Va ue Error ML Evaluation Evaluation Matrix: Al Bqifitter AM241 1.000 0.050 0 "I52 .0.013 6.579 N CE144 ,

18.200 0.200 15 00 1.000 1,159 W CO 57 12.660 0.060 10. 10 1.000 1.171 W

'O60 5.950 0.090 5. 10 0,300 1.188 N

W CS134 11.160, 0.090 10, 80 1.000 1.026 A CS137 W

10.500 0.100 e.y 00 0.800 GA 1 GB 2 0.960 0.590 0.020 0.010 960 0.$ 50 0.050 0.030 1.207 1.000 1.311 W

A A

I W

A MN 54 9.800 0.100 7.(20 0.600 1.286 W N PU238 0.065 0.004 0.100 0.006 0.649 W A PU239 0.083 o,oo4 0.119 0.006 0.699 W SB125 12.800 0.500 12.330 1,000 1.038 A U 238 0.800 0.200 0.105 0,004 7.656 N Matrix: Bq/kg AM241 5.000 0.500 5.080 0.500 A CS137 0.880 A 841.000 2.000 825,500 14.100 1,019 A A K 40 34'l.ooo 6.000 '34.050 7.140 1.020 A A PU238 0.238 0.240, 0.$ 30 0.111 0.449 W W PU239 147.374 4.190 134.930 17.100 1.092 A A U 238 34.700 3.700 42.$ 30 2.500 0.818 A Matrix: VE Bqlkg I

AM241 2.300 0.500 .1 ~ 1 3 0.113 1,944 W A CO 60 14.500 0.600 12.5 0 A CS137 0.320 1.160 A 219.000 1.000 189.2, 0 7.270 1.157 A W K 40 953.000 13.000 811.500 12.200 1.'l74 A A Matrix: WA Bq/L 1 CO 60 97.600 0.800 90,850 1,150 1.074 A W I CS134 22.500 0.400 20.550 0.310 1.095 A 1' CS137 79.400 0.800 69.780 1.230 1.138 A W GA 1 1332.000 19.000 1130.060 . 10.000 1.170 A W 1 GB 2 643.000 9.000 744.000 10.000 0.860 A A 1 H 3 228.000 2.000 250.300 4.200 0.911 A A MN 54 24.300 0.300 20.850 0.310 1.165 W W 1 PU238 1.310 0.021 0.063 1.015 A W 1 PU239 0.815 0.014 o.'e)o 0.050 0.959 A ~

W Values for elemental uranium are reported in p ilter, 9, or IL.

pCl/g or rnL ~ Bq x 0.021

L 4,

DUH ENV RH13LHILUN IRL l.ax:4Ur'-Z9r'-AN> i.eO --'87'97 28S5Y. 18/18 EML 694 QAP 9709 January 1,199f3 GAP 47 Re Umts by Laboratory 5~p+ l f +

Lab'. FL Florida De t of Health 8 Rehab. SeN . Orlando I

No. Radio. Reported Reported - EwfLf EML QAP 46 Test nuclide Value Error Vafu'e Error ML Evaluation Evaluation Matrix: Al Air Filter Bqlfilter r

1 AM24'f CE'l44 0.440 '.050 0.2110 0.009 2.060 N N 1 15.700 0.300 19.120 0.700 0.820 A W 1 CO 57, 10.330" 0.050 12.650 0.430 0.810 A W

"

1 CO 60 9.1TO 0.120 10.7 0 1.090 0.850 A W 1 CS134. ~ 21,900 0.170 28.170 0,730 0.770 W A 1

1 CS137 GA 6.900

'l e470 0,100 0.040 njo 0.250 0.090 0.940 0.980 A

A W

A 1 GB 3.280 0,050 3.0qo 0.140 1.090 A A

'f MN 54 6.300 0.100 6.720 0.270 0.930 A W 1 PU238 0.210 0.007 0.210 0.007 1.000 A W 1 PU239 0,110 0.005 0.100 0.'o04 1.030 A W 1 SB125 13.900 0.400 16.180 0.790 0.860 A A Matrix: SO Soil Bq/kg AM241 5.700 0.600 6.040 0,580 O,94O A CO 60 1.600 0.200 1.500 0.400 1.060 A CS137 838.000 2.000 810.000 40.000 1.030 A A K 40 306.000 5.000 315,000 20.000 0.970 A A U238 27.7OO 3.?00 34.900 0.140 0.790 A A Matrix: VE Vegetation Bqlkg AM241 5.300 O.TOO 3.460 0.250 1.530 A W CO 60 34.900 0.500 32.400 1.600 1.070 A A CS'l37 738.000 2.000 624.000 31.000 1.180 A A K 40 1183.000 10.000 'f130.000 70.000 1.040 A A Matrix: NA Water BqlL 1 CO 60 25.700 0.300 23.304 1.200 1.'foo A A CS134 74.500 0.500 66.00 2.600 1.120 A A CS137 39.300 0.600 34.30 1.700 1.140 A A GA 841.620 12.750 557.00, 60.000 1.510 N W GB 1060.000 9.400 712.000 70.000 1 480 A H 3" 112.000 1,700 115.00/ 6.ooo 0.970 A A 1 MN 54 45.300 0.600 37.800 1.900 1.190 W W Vafues for etetnentaf uranium are reported in fIlg/filter,g, or mL. ~

Evatnanon, A=Aoeeptabie, W Aooeptabie with Waminti N=Not Aeoeptabia pCilg or mL = 80 a 0027

~

lfthe evaluation system ls not appropriate for the types of analyses performed ln your lab, apply site specific evaluation. ~

99

o ~

l "1

4