ML17229A697

Annual Environ Radiological Operating Rept for 1997

ML17229A697
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	12/31/1997
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17229A696	List: L-98-097, Forwards 1997 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, for St Lucie,Units 1 & 2.Rept Provides Info Summaries & Analytical Results of REMP ML17229A697
References
NUDOCS 9804220287
Download: ML17229A697 (91)

Text

1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 5. 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data submitted by:

Florida DOH Prepared by:

Reviewed by:

,9804220287 980415 PDR ADOCK 05000335 R

PDR

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary TABLE 1 Deviations/Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities TABLE 1B Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENTA Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and Light Company's St. Lucie Site ATTACHMENTB First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, 1997 ATTACHMENTC

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St. Lucie Unit 1 5.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM A.

Purpose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the St.

Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Control 3/4.12.1.

Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

C.

Surface water samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively.

Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 d.

Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples.

Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2.

Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH).

Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

hnaLy~aLBesults provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.

Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 D.

A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.

A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Xahl~,

Summary..

No locations yielding a calculated dose or Jose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

The lnterlaboratory Comparison Program is being changed.

Prior to 1997, the Department of Health Laboratory, performing our analyses, participated in the EPA sponsored program.

This program consisted of air filters, milk, and water samples.

The results were reported in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM.

The EPA Interlaboratory Comparison program relative to nuclear power plant environmental monitoring programs was discontinued.

The EPA program did continue, however, in support of the Safe Drinking Water Program; the State laboratory, being a Certified SDWP laboratory, continued to receive, and analyze, water samples.

Since 1990, the State Laboratory has participated in the Department of Energy's Interlaboratory Comparison Program ( the "DOE-QAP" program).

This program consists of air filters, water, soil, and vegetation.

For the reports covering calendar year 1997, and proposed for calendar year 1998, the results of participating in the DOE-QAP will be included with the results of the EPA water samples in ATTACHMENTC, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM. Note that the right most columns, QAP45 and QAP 46 Evaluation, are the result of the last intercomparison results for comparison to the most recent evaluation shown in the second from right column.

The future of both the EPA and DOE programs past the end of 1998 are uncertain.

FPL is in the process of identifying a new suitable intercomparison program.

The program will be described in the ODCM and the results will be incorporated in ATTACHMENT C,

RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM.

(3)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by St. Lucie Plant, ODCM. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1.

In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.

Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant.

The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program.

Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents.

All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable l-131

~

Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.

The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preope rational surveillance program.

Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

3.

Surface Water:

The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was

.reported as present in four of the weekly samples collected from Site H-15.

The highest concentration was less than 3% of the reporting level specified by the ODCM, Table 3.12-2.

No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.

Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.

(4)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 &. 2 4.

Waterborne Sediment and Food Products:

The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne

sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.

There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.

5.

Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.

There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

One of twelve control location samples exhibited a positive result for CS-137 at about 13% of the required LLD as listed in ODCM table 4.12-1.

Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.

The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental

samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.

Lucie Units 1

&. 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)"criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility ', Docket No(s).

Location of Facility ', Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)

Page 8

Type and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Lower Limit of Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f) Ran e

Distance 5.

Direction Ran e

Control Locations Mean (f) Ran e

Exposure Rate,106'.87 (102/102)

NW-10 4.02 - 6.37 10 mi., NW 6.1 7 (4/4) 5.62 - 6.37 5.09 (4/4) 4.55 - 5.51 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility ', Docket No(s).

Location of Facility ', Reporting Period ~

(County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINEAND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO - Ci/M Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)"

Page Type and Total Number Lower Limit of of Anal ses Performed Detection'LLD)

AII Indicator Locations Distance 8c Mean (f) Ran e

Direction Ran e

Control Locations Mean (f) Ran e

'"I, 260 Gross Beta, 260 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 0.024 0.0025

<MDA 0.012 (201/208)

H-34 0.001 - 0.026 0.5 mi ~, N 0.013 (51/52) 0.004 - 0.024

< MDA 0.012 (49/52) 0.003 - 0.024

'Be 134CS 137CS 210Pb 0.0052 0.00069 0.00066 0.1230 (16/16) 0.0914 - 0.1543

<MDA

<MDA 0.0124 (16/16) 0.0048 - 0.0186 H-14 1 mi., SE H-14 1 mi., SE 0.1275 (4/4) 0.1253 (4/4) 0.1120 - 0.1404 0.1024 - 0.1592

< MDA

< MDA 0.0143 (4/4) 0.0137 (4/4) 0.0116 - 0.0177 0.0098 - 0.0216 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

Page ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility ', Docket No(s).

Location of Facility ', Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER

'UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)b Type and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Lower Limit of Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Distance 5.

Mean (f) Ran e

Direction Ran e

Control Locations Mean (f) Ran e

Tritium, 64 Gamma Isotopic, 64 230 318 (3/52)

H-15 318 (3/52) 135 - 640

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 180 - 640 104 (1/12)

"Mn esFe 68Co

~Co 66Zn seZr-Nb 131I 134CS

'"Cs 140Ba La 60 331 (52/52) 244 - 394

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA H-15 331 (52/52)

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 244 - 394 328 (12/12) 274 - 393

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

1 0

Page 8

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility ', Docket No(s).

Location of Facility ', Reporting Period UanuaL (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO-Ci/K, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ype and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 Lower Limit of Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f) Ran e

Distance 5.

Direction Ran e

Control Locations Mean (f)'an e

40K 33'Ra 3 Co

~Co 134CS 137 CS 140 49 12 12 814 (2/2) 292 - 1337 336 (2/2) 181 - 492 308 (1/2)

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA H-15 814 (2/2)

<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 292 - 1337 H-15 336 (2/2)

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 181 - 492 H-15 308 (1/2)

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 6mi~,S 268 (2/2) 257 - 280 210 (2/2) 190 - 231

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

0

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name ofFacility, Docket No(s).

Location of Facility ', Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO-Ci/K, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'age 8

Type and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 228Ra

'4Mn "Fe 58Co 80Co 5Zn 134CS 137( S Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 130 19 17 All Indicator Locations Mean (f) Ran e

1610 (2/2) 1457 - 1764

<MDA

<MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA Distance tk Direction H-15

<1 mi.,

ENE/E/ESE Ran e

1610 (2/2) 1457 - 1764 Control Locations Mean (f) Ran e

1530 (2/2) 1437 - 1624

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA

<MDA

<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name ofFacility, Docket No(s).

Location of Facility

', Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO-Ci/K, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)

Page

. 8 Type and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K "Mn "Fe 58Co

~co Zn 134CS 137CS Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 130 16 10 17 All Indicator Locations Mean (f) Ran e

2178 (2/2) 1770 - 2585

< MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

< MDA

< MDA

< MDA Distance 5 Direction H-15

<1 mi.,

ENE/E/ESE Ran e

2178 (2/2) 1770 - 2585 Control Locations Mean (f)'an e

2842 (2/2) 1680 - 4005

<MDA

< MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name ofFacility, Docket No(s).

Location ofFacility, Reporting Period (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO-Ci/K, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'age Type and Total Number of Anal ses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 36 Lower Limit of Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Distance &

Mean (f) Ran e

Direction Ran e

Control Locations Mean (f) Ran e

Be 40K 131 I 134C 137CS 71 100 689 (24/24) 458 - 1134 2606 (24/24) 1488 - 4282

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA H-52 1 mi., S/SSE H-51 1 mi., N/NNW.

748 (12/12) 474 - 1134 2641 (12/12) 1733 - 4282 552 (12/12) 258 - 861 2133 (12/12) 894 - 4281

< MDA

<MDA 11 (1/12)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

= 0

Page 8

ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name ofFacility, Docket No(s).

Location of Facility

', Reporting Period (County, State)

The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that willyield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

LLDs in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.

Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).

C.

Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

Results were based upon the average net response of two TLDs. (Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDArefers to minimum detectable activity.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 DEVIATIONS/MISSINGDATA A)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

B)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

C)

Pathway:

Locations:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

Airborne; Radioiodine 131 5 Particulates H-30, 2 miles W 08/04/97 to 08/12/97 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Air sampling pump failed about 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> into the 190 hour0.0022 days <br />0.0528 hours <br />3.141534e-4 weeks <br />7.2295e-5 months <br /> sampling period.

Repaired sampling equipment, verified sampling equipment as operable.

Airborne; Radioiodine 131 8c Particulates H-34, 0.5 miles N 08/12/97 to 08/18/97 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Air sampling hose found disconnected at end of sample period.

Evaluation of sampling filter material concluded virtually no sample collected.

Repaired sampling equipment, verified sampling equipment as operable.

Direct Exposure W-2, 2 miles W and SSE-5, 5 miles SSE 09/11/97 to 12/05/97 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

TLD's missing when collection was attempted.

New TLD's deployed near original locations.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONlVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8a 2 ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/97 - 12/31/97 A)

Pathway:

Location:

Cause:

LLD Achieved:

B)

Pathway:

Locations:

Cause:

LLD Achieved:

Airborne; Radioiodine 131

5. Particulates H-30, 2 miles W Sampling equipment failure lead to small sample size.

0.017 versus required 0.01 pCi/m Airborne; Radioiodine 131 5 Particulates H-08, 6 miles WNW and H-12, 12 miles S Short sampling period due to scheduling error.

H-08: 0.011 v. required 0.01 pCi/m H-12: 0.018 v. required 0.01 pCi/m

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONlVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 LAND USE CENSUS Sector NNE 7/97 Milk (c)

Animal 0 (e) 7/97 Residence 7/97 Garden (d)

ENE ESE SE SSE SSW SW WSW

.W WNW NW NNW 1.5/141 (g) 3.3/1 53 (g) 3.2/191 2.2/213 1.9/236 1.9/245 (h) 1.9/260 2.3/281 3.5/304 L (g)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 L 2 XMLE2 LAND USE CENSUS All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant.

The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.

Potential milk animal locations.

All locations specified have been verified to be nai producing milk for human consumption.

Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance Dascripiian SSE 1.8/149 Fire Station NNW 2.8/348 A new community is being developed, occupancy not expected until mid 1998.

SE 1.1/132 Lifeguard station at beach Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St.

Lucie Plant.

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 FIGURE M SITE AREA MAP & ENVIRONMENTALSAMPLE LOCATIONS Q lq

~$

u FPt.'s Property Vne Ne pg~

Af~@pq 1

Blind Creek j

EC LU0 Q"

WNW-2 D

H34

~A" EXCLUSlONAREA (0.97 ml)

ANO LOW W2 POPULATlON ZONE(1 ml)+

NOTES:

1)

L-VquldRadwaste Release Point

2) Due to the scale ot the Rgure the Exclusion Area Radius (OAV'mge) and the Low Population Zone (1 mlle) area shown as being the same atza WSW-2 FPL's Property Vne SE-5pg3

%4 f~g'-'+7 HH14 H H52

'e Om SCALE IN MlLES (C-200A. WPG)

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALfNVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 FIGURE 1-2 ENVIRONMENTALSAMPLE LOCATIONS 10 MILES HW.10 WNW-10 EOF W-1

~,5 rPr,.;4h ~

g 4;

'~@~~)

C WSW4 WSW-10

~k @

%4f4fe 4~

~r SW-10 ting r

h~a" 4@4, SS E-10';.

SSW '10 H12

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONIVIENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8c 2 Page 1 of 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location

~arne N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 CaatraL H-32 Direction

%acta@

N NNW NNW NW NW WNW WNW WNW W

W W

WSW WSW WSW SW SW SW SSW SSW SSW S

S SSE SSE SSE SE NNW Approximate Distance smiles) 1 5

9 6

10 3

5 10 2

5 9

2 5

10 2

5 10 3

6 8

5 10 10 5

10 1

19 A1A, North of Blind Creek South of Pete Stone Creek Coast Guard Station Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.

S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.

U.S.

1 at S.R. 712 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike 7609 Indian River Drive Oleander and Sager Street Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 8503 Indian River Dr.

Prima Vista at Yacht Club Del Rio at Davis Street 9207 Indian River Drive U.S.

1 at Village Green Dr.

Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.

10307 Indian River Drive U.S.

1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.

Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.

13179 Indian River Drive U.S.

1 at S.R. 714 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane Entrance to Nettles Island Elliot Museum South of Cooling Canal University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINEAND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Location Meme H-08 H-14 H-30 H-34 Direction Nectar WNW SE W

Approximate Distance Oniles) 0.5 Description FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.

On-Site, Near South Property Line Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive On-Site at Meteorology Tower H-12 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8a 2 Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

H-15 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Location Mama Direction Hector Approximate Distance smiles H-51 ENE/E/SSE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Caniral H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location

~arne Direction Deciar Approximate Distance Umilesl H-1 5 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5. 2 Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location

~arne Direction Daatax Approximate Distance

~miles)

H-1 5 ENE/E/ESE Ocean Side, Vicinityof St. Lucie Plant H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location

~arne H-51 H-52 Direction Aaatar N/NNW S/SSE Approximate Distance smiles)

Descriptian Off-site Near North Property Line Off-site Near South Property Line Central:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5 2 RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE 1997 First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997

RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLOMDAPOWER ANDLIGHT'S ST. LUCIE SITE FIRST QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1997

1. Direct Radiation CaJMihn Eragucan Quarterly 27 Number of Gamp'7

2. Airborne 2.a. AirIodines 2.b. AirParticulates Weekly Weekly 60 60

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water tes 4.a.l. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation 3.b. Shoreline Sediment

~4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebra Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 12 3

2 Total: 177 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as less than' Lower Limitof Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit(with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

Sample Site N-1 Deployment 12-Dec-96 Collection 13-Mar-97 4.55 + 0.37 NNW-5 NNW-10 4.41 + 0.36 4.45 + 0.36 NW-5 NW-10 4.97 + 0.40 5.62 + 0.44 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 4.80 + 0.39 4.69 + 0.38 4.88 + 0.39 W-2 W-5 W-10 6.08 + 0.48 5.24 + 0.42 4.99 + 0.40 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 4.82 + 0.39 4.86 + 0.39 4.12 + 0;34 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 4.36 + 0.36 5.77 + 0.45 4.65 & 0.38

'SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 4.44 + 0.36 5.40 + 0.43 5.05 + 0.40 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 4.96 6 0.40 4.83 & 0.38 4.48 + 0.36 SSE-5 SSE-10 4.64 + 0.37 4.56 &0.37 SE-1 H-32 4.37 + 0.36 5.34 + 0.42

W Collection Date 06-Jan-97 15-Jan-97 22-Jan-97 29-Jan-97 H08

<0.02

<0.01 H12

<0.01 H14

<0.01

<0.01 H30

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 H34

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 03-Feb-97 13-Feb-97 19-Feb-97 25-Feb-97

<0.03

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 04-Mar-97 12-MK-97 17-MK-97 26-Mar-97

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.04

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.03

<0.01

2 AIR Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 06-Jan-97 0.002 w 0.002 0.004 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002 0.001 w 0.001 0.004+ 0.002 15-Jan-97 0.009 ~ 0.002 0.006 a 0.001 0.009 a 0.002 0.006 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 22-Jan-97 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.013 a 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.016 ~ 0.002 29-Jan-97 0.010 R 0.002 0.011 2 0.002 0.014 R 0.002 0.010 R 0.002 0.012 R 0.002 03-Feb-97 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.003+ 0.002 0.008 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 13-Feb-97 0.010 a 0.002 0.008 ~ 0,002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.003 ~ 0.001 0.009 a 0.002 19-Feb-97 0.007 a 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.004 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 25-Feb-97 0,010 ~ 0.002 0.004 ~ 0.002 0.008 s 0.002 04-Mar-97 0.006+ 0.002 0.006 W 0.002 0.008+ 0.002 0.001 ~ 0.002 0.007 ~ 0.002 0.009 a 0.002 0.007 ~ 0.002 12-Mar-97 0.012 2 0.002 0,012 w 0.002 0.011 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002 0.012 w 0.002 17-Mar-97 0.019~0.003 0.017~0.002 0.016~0.002 0.013~0.002 0.017+0.002 26-Mar-97 0,014 a 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0:010 a 0.002 0.014 ~ 0.002

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

0.013 a 0.002 Mean:

0.010 a 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.010 ~ 0.001 0.006 ~ 0.001 0.011+ 0.001 2.2 P RTI A E A TERLY MP ITE i

m'am

~li g H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Ra2

0. 1408 a 0,0099

<0.0173 G~I4

<0.0010 G~I7

<0.0010 D=2JQ 0.0115 w 0.0029 0.1265 w 0.0124

<0.0149

<0.0007

<0.0008 0.0118 R 0.0027 0.1196 w 0.0108

<0.0165

<0.0009

<0.0008 0.0128 w 0.0030 0.0940 w 0.0096

<0.0174

<0.0011

<0.0007 0.0077 w 0.0025 0.1384 2 0.0105

<0.0166

<0.0008

<0.0008 0.0134 w 0.0025

Sample Collection

~i

~t H15 07-Jan-97

<140 14-Jan-97

<140 HM ME M MQ 330 + 17

<2

<2

<3

<2 350+ 39

<4

<4

<8

<4

<5 Zr-95 Hh='5 (A)

L13l C.'M

<5 Ba-140 C~

L;>~4 (B) 22-Jan-97

<141 301 + 22

<2 28-Jan-97

<141 387 + 33

<3

<5

<6

<4

<8

<5

<3

<4

<3 04-Feb-97

<143 13-Feb-97

<143 276+ 36 335 + 36

<4

<4

<7

<4

<8

<9

<4

<9

<5

<6

<4

<5

<4

<4

<6

<6 18-Feb-97

<145 341 + 28

<2

<3

<5

<5

<3

<6 25-Feb-97

<144 3S1 + 35

<3 03-Mar-97

<145 392 + 3S

<4 11-Mar-97

<145 352 + 34

<4 17-Mar-97 135 + 32 374 + 26

<3 27-Mar-97

<140 373 + 32

<3

<4 H59 07-Jan-97 104 + 45 303 + 32

<3

<8

<8

<5

<8

<7

<9

<3

<6

<4

<7

<6

<4

<3

<4

<4

<10

<5

<7

<7

<7

<3

<7

<7

<6

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<5

<5

<4

<3

<6

<6

<5

<9

<5 04-Feb-97

<143 03-Mar-97

<145 296 + 35

<4

<4

<9

<3

<7

<10 351+ 17

<2

<2

<3

<2

<3

<3

<3

<4

<4 (A) - These tabulated LLDvalues for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher ofthe individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth ofLa-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

/k we'8 H59 2S-Feb-97

<74 257 + 44

<7

<6

<9 Sample Collection DaLe H15 26-Feb-97

<69 292 + 43

<6

<6

<6 Zh=El En&i U23E

<572 181 + 10

<305

<677 231 & 9

<361 4

1 w

w Sample Collection

~4 hhM ~ ~ C~ ~

C.'~1 CsKB

. Jh~2 ZW28 H15 2S-Feb-97 H59 26-Feb-97 1764 + 162

<19

<19

<41

<23

<45

<17

<22 1437 + 161

<15

<18

<40

<26

<45

<15

<17

<361

<3S3

<85

<113 W

W Sample Collection Mate

~4 hid ME L2 Mdl ~

GsJZ M2 ZQZ6 MK H15 26-Feb-97 H59 2S-Feb-97 1770+ 179

<16

<18

<41

<18

<44

<17

<22 1680 + 185

<14

<15

<34

<21

<42

<17

<22

<345

<3S1

i

.FAF V

/

w Sample Site H51 Collection Date

'07-Jan-97 04-Feb-97 04-Mar-97 BQ-7 K-40 1-131 582 + 54 2550 + 117

<9 562+58 2192+104

<14 669 + 55 2457 + 108

<17 Cs-134

<9

<10

<8 Cs-137

<9

<10

<8 Pb-210

<556

<574

<514 Ra-226

<203

<215

<177 H52 07-Jan-97 474 + 51 2487 + 116

<10 04-Feb-97 577 s 60 1739 + 110

<11 04-Mar-97 1134 + 2S 2324 + 4S

<S

<9

<ll

<4

<11

<506

<616 480 + 107

<176

<221

<81 H59 07-Jan-97 763+54 1473+97

<10 04-Feb-97 258 + 47 2070 + 112

<14 04-Mar-97 453 + 48 1918 + 93

<17

<9

<11

<9

<9

<12

<8

<547

<495

<475

<227

<198

<171

FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDAPOWER ANDLIGHTCOMPANY ST. LUCIEPLANT SECOND QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1997 Cdhadan Zrcqucnm Number of 5 mph'

~ Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27

2. Airborne 2.a.'ir Iodines 2.b; AirParticulates Weekly Weekly 65 65

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 12 3

0 Total:

181 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ggi significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limitof Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit(with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

Sample Site N-1 Deployment 13-Mar-97 Collection 10-Jun-97 4.82 & 0.37 NNW-5 NNW-10 4.57 + 0.35 4.48 + 0.34 NW-5 NW-10 4.68 + 0.36 6.37 + 0.47 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 4.81 + 0.36 4.66 &,0.35 5.11 + 0.39 W-2 W-5

'-10 5.83 & 0.43 5,07 + 0.38 5.11 + 0.38 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 4.70 + 0.36 4.53 + 0.34 4.02 + 0.31 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 4.63 & 0.35 5.50 + 0.41 4.56 + 0.35 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 4.53 + 0.34 4.85 &0.37 4.94 + 0.37 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 4.62 + 0.35 4.66 + 0.35 4.07 + 0.31 SSE-5 SSE-10 4.48 + 0.35 4.30 + 0.33 SE-1 H-32 4.27 & 0.33 4.55 + 0.35

0

Collection Date 01-Apr-97 08-Apr-97 15-Apr-97 22-Apr-97 29-Apr-97 H08

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02 H12

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01 H14

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01 H30

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01 H34

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01 05-May-97 14-May-97 20-May-97 27-May-97

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

'0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.03

<0,01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.01 03-Jun-97 10-Jun-97 18-Jun-97 24-Jun-97

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

.. <0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

Collection Date HOS H12 Sample Site H14 H30 H34 01-Apr-97 0.021 + 0.003 0.016 + 0.003 0.019 + 0.003 0.012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.01S + 0.003

'0.017 + 0.002 08-Apr-97 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.01'4 a 0.002 0.012 +,0.002 15-Apr-97 22-Apr-97 0.01S+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.016+0.003 0.017+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.018'+0.003 0.015+0.002 0.022+0.003 0.014+0.002 29-Apr-97 0.017 + 0.003 0.009 ~ 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.014 a 0.002 05-May-97 0.016 + 0.003 0.016 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.003 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 14-May-97 0.008 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 20-May-97 0.013 + 0.003 0.015 + 0.003 0.011 + 0,003 0.015 + 0.003 0.012 + 0.003 27-May-97 0.013 + 0.002 0.014.+ 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 03-Jun-97 0.007 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 10-Jun-97 0.005 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 18-Jun-97 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.004+0.002 0.007+0.002 24-Jun-97 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.014+0.002 0:013+0.002 Mean:

0.013.+ 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 Sampl~~e HOS H12 H14 H30 H34 0.1222 4. 0.0091

<0.0160

<0.0009

<0.0008 0.1131 & 0.0105

<0.0163

<0.0007

<0.0008 0.1404* 0.0102

<0.0173

<0.0009

<0.0007 0.1446 & 0.0095

<0.0167

<0.0011

<0.0007 0.1280 & 0.0092

<0.0179

<0.0007

<0.0008 P~

0.0146 & 0.0030 0.0115 & 0.0028 0.0152 & 0.0033 0.0124 & 0.0029 0.0130 + 0.0031

a RF FW F

i/

Sample Collection K4L Ha%4. ME

<4

<8

<5

<4

<7

<3

<5

<5

<3

<6

<3 H15 02-Apr-97

<146 360 + 39

<3 OS-Apr-97

<140 2S2 + 40

<3 14-Apr-97

<140 361 + 35

<4 21-Apr-97 640+28 374+28

<3 Zr-95 (A)

<6

<9

<7

<9

<5

<6

<6

. <6

<5

<5

<3

<4

<4

<5

<3

<4

<4

<4

<4 Ll31 CUB MZ Ba-140 J a-~4 (B)

<6

<6

<5

<6 29-Apr-97

<143 319 + 34

<4

<3 06-May-97 180 + 24 3S4 + 37

<3

<4 15-May-97

<147 310+ 34

<4

<4

<7

<6

<5

<5

<6

<7

<5

<8

<7

<6

<8

<4

<9

<7

<4

<3

<4

<4

<4

<4

<6

<5

<5 19-May-97

<143 270 + 31 28-May-97

<143 298 + 32

<3

<4

<8

<5

<8

<7

<4

<4

<5

<6

<3

<4

<4

<4

<4

<10 03-Jun-97

<139 367 + 31

<4

<8

<4

<8

<7

<5

<4

<5

<6 10-Jun-97

<139 279 + 2S

<4

<3

<7 18-Jun-97

<147 346+ 35

<3

<3

<7

<5

<6

<5

<4

<4

<5

<6

<6

<4

<4

<6

<9 25-Jun-97

<147 316 + 34

<4 H59 15-Apr-97

<140 278 + 35

<4 06-May-97

<144 386 + 33

<3

<4

<7

<4

<7

<3

<7

<4

<7,

<7

<5

<4

<4

<10

<7

<4

<4

<4

<7

<6

<6

<4

<4

<5

<3

<4

<6

<5 04-Jun-97

<139 360 + 34

<4

<4

<7

<5

<6

<7

<5

<4

<5

<6 (A) - These tabulated LLDvalues for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher ofthe individual parerit or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth ofLa-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

D e

we'ample Site H51 Collection Date 15-Apr-97 06-May-97 04-Jun-97 Be-7 K-40 I-131 710 + 46 1880 + 8S

<7 553 + 55 2384 & 134

<11 612 + 47 3004 + 104

<7 Cs-134

<8

<12

<8 Cs-137

<8

<10 Pb-210

<458

<684

<416 Ra-226

<167

<234

<158 H52 14-Apr-97 810 + 51 4014 + 129

<9 06-May-97 773 + 59 3344 + 150

<9 04-Jun-97 662 + 43 14SS + S3

<7 "

<9

<11

<8

<9

. <8

<509

<599

<416

<192

<244

<164 H59 15-Apr-97 640 + 47 2844 + 110

<7 06-May-97 554 + 49 894 + 80

<10 04-Jun-97 602 + 54 1901 + 93

<7

<9

<10

<8

<10

<9

<417

<621

<467

<156

<209

<175

FLORIDADEPARTMENT OP RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDAPOWER ANDLIGHTCOMPANY ST. LUCIEPLANT THIRD QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

ST. LUCIESITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1997

1. Direct Radiation

2. Airborne 2.a. AirIodines 2.b. AirParticulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Calhaiian Zrc@mm Quarterly Weekly Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 27 Number of Smnpha 27 69 69 14 Total: 197 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are lan significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limitof Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit(with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

1I 0

Sample Site N-1 Deployment 10-Jun-97 Collection 11-Sep-97 4.74 + 0.37 NNW-5 NNW-10 4.46 + 0.35 5.09 + 0.39 NW-5 NW-10 4.76 & 0.37 6.36 + 0.49 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 4.82 + 0.38 4.76 + 0.37 4.87 & 0.38 W-2 W-5 W-10 5.90 + 0.45 5.19 + OAO 4.87 + 0.38 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 4.66 & 0.37 4.77 + 0.37 4.08 + 0.33 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 4.65 + 0.36 5.57 + 0.43 4.81 + 0.38 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 4.77 + 0.37 5.05 + 5.05 4.94 + 0.39 S-5 S-10 4.72 & 0.37 4.91 + 0.39 S/SSE-10 4.61 + 0.37 SSE-5 SSE-10 4.79 + 0.37 4.76 & 0.38 SE-1 H-32 4.30 + 0.34 4.96 & 0.38

Collection Date 01-Jul-97 10-Jul-97 14-Jul-97 23-Jul-97 29-Jul-97 04-Aug-97 12-Aug-97 18-Aug-97 25-Aug-97 04-Sep-97 11-Sep-97 15-Sep-97 26-Sep-97 29-Sep-97 H08

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0,01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0.01

<0.04 H12

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0.01

<0.04 H14

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0,02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0.01

<0.03 H30

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.07 (A)

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0,01

<0.04 H34

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 (B)

<0.02

<0.01

<0.02

<0.03

<0.01

<0.03 (A)

The air pump was not functioning at the time of collection. Ne estimate the run time was 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> out of 190 during the sampling period.

(B)

The air hose was not connected at time of sample collection.

Due to the condition of the particulate filter, we estimate there was no sample collection.

Collection H08 H12 H14'30 H34 01-Jul-97 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011+ 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 10-Jul-97 0.015 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.010 0.002 14-Jul-97 0.011 0.003

<0.008 0.009 0.003 0.008 0,003 0.010 0.003 23-Jul-97 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.002 29-Jul-97 0,010 a 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 04-Aug-97 0.004+ 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 0.007 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 12-Aug-97 0.008 w 0.002 0.007 w 0.002 0.006 w 0.002

<0.017 (A) 0.009 ~ 0.002 18-Ailg 97 0 006 w 0 002 0.007 w 0 002

<0.007 0 007 w 0.002 (B) 25-Aug-97 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.006 a 0.002 0.005 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 04-Sep-97 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 11-Sep-97 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.014 ~ 0.002 15-Sep-97 0.008 ~ 0.003

<0.008 0.009 ~ 0.003 0.010+ 0.003 0.008 ~ 0.003 26-Sep-97 0.011 ~ 0.001 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.015 s 0.002 29-Sep-97

<0.011 (C)

<0.018 (C)

<0.008

<0.010 0.011 ~ 0.003 Mean:

<0.010

<0.011

<0.010

<0.010 0.010 ~ 0.001 (A)

The air pump was not functioning at the time of collection. We estimate the run time was 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> out of 190 during the sampling period.

(B)

The air hose was not connected at time of sample collection.

Due to the condition of the particulate filter, we estimate there was no sample collection.

(C)

The volume for this sample was low due to a short sampling period (3 days).

QM~

CM H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.0914 w 0.0083 0.1024 w 0.0085 0.1120 w 0.0091 0.1015 w 0.0098 0.1007 w 0.0089

<0.0177

<0.0178

<0.0145

<0.0174

<0.0168

-<0.0010

<0.0009

<0.0011

<0.0010

<0.0009

<0.0009

<0.0009

<0.0008

<0.0010

<0.0010 0.0109 w 0.0024 0.0098 w 0.0024 0.0116 w 0.0030 0.0048 w 0.0038 0.0110 ~ 0.0031

a R

Sample Collection

~e

~h

%3=3 hh<4 QHE H15 01-Jul-97

<149 341 a 30

<4

<4

<10

<5

<9 Zr-95 (A)

<4

<5 L131 ~B CzJ32 Ba-140 j a144l (B)

<5 10-Jul-97

<149 288 + 33

<4

<3

<8 14-Jul-97

<148 328 + 27

<3

<3

<6 23-Jul-97

<147 316 + 28

<3

<3

<7 29-Jul-97

<147 344 + 30

<4

<4

<6

<5

<6

<7

<4

<6

<5

<4

<6

<5

<6

<9

<7

<5

<4

<4

<5

<4

<5

<5

<4

<5 04-Aug-97

<153 316 + 35

<4

<4 12-Aug-97

<153 244 + 36

<4

'3 18-Aug-97

<147 267 + 34

<3

<4 25-Aug-97

<147 295 + 37

<4

<4 04-Sep-97

<151 351+ 37

<4

<3 11-Sep-97

<151 304 + 33

<4

<3 15-Sep-97

<151 371 + 31

<3

<3 25-Sep-97

<166 386 + 35

<5

<4 29-Sep-97

<166 245 + 32

<3

<4 H59 02-Jul-97

<149 393 + 37

<4

<4

<9

<8

<8

<6

<6

<8

<5

<7

<8

<5

<8

<7

<4

<9

<7

<8

<5

<9

<8

<5

<8

<6

<5

<7

<6

<5

<8

<7

<5

<8

<6

<4

<8

<8

<8

<4

<4

<6

<6

<4

<4

<6

<4

<9

<4

<4

<4

<5

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<5

<4

<5

<4

<4

<6

<9

<8

<6

<9

<4 05-Aug-97

<153 322 + 34

<4

<5

<8

<5

<7

<6

<4

<4 04-Sep-97

<151 338 + 17

<2

<2

<4

<2

<3

<3

<3

<2

<2 (A) - These tabulated LLDvalues for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher ofthe individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLDvalues are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement ofBa-140 or based on ingrowth ofLa-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

W 1

Sample Collection H15 18-Aug-97

<98 1337+ 77

<10 H59 18-Aug-97

'87 280 + 48

<6

<11

<9

<15

<8 CM

<10

<9 25219 En226 Ih232 LGk

<958 492 + 14 308 + 17

<830

<656 190+ 9

<46

<380 W

W Sample Collection

~h

~4 hf~ ~ ~

CnE ~

Cs=LB GsJZl Jh=226.

B~ZL H15 30-JUI-97 H59 15-Sep-97 1624+ 195

<15

<19

<37

<24

<34

<25

<18 1457 + 172

<20

<22

<39

<30

<47

<24

<24

<394

<400

<127

<108 W

W Sample Collection

~h

~4 hire% QdE LS M8 ~ M2 Ml LQ26.

2428 H15 30-Jul-97 H59 30-Jul-97 2585 + 212

<17

<21

<49

<33

<42

<25

<29 4005 + 173

<14

<15

<31

<23

<34

<17

<17

<332

<257

<99

<65

I

-B W

Sample Site H51 Collection Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 02-Jul-97 578 + 23 2817 + 56

<7 05-Aug-97 458 + 54 1733 + 105

<11 04-Sep-97 824 + 63 4282 + 153

<13 Cs-134

<4

<9

<11 Cs-137

<4

<13

<10 Pb-210

<234

<588

<565 Ra-226

<88

<199

<218 Other H52 02-Jul-97 712+64 3538+140

<16 05-Aug-97 620+56 2233+120

<10 04-Sep-97 596 + 47 3218 + 142

<10

<10

<12

<11

<10

<11

<10

<542

<513

<556

-<202

<211 Pb-212:

3456 + 677

<223 H59 02-Jul-97 566 + 60 2355 + 107

<15 05-Aug-97 658 + 59 1312 + 90

<13 04-Sep-97 453 + 51 2637 + 126

<9

<9

<9

<10

<9 11+5

<11

<516

<481

<476

<193

<201

<223

FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDAPOWER ANDLIGHTCOMPANY ST. LUCIEPLANT FOURTH QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL

0

SL QR97-4 ST. LUCIESITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1997

1. Direct Radiation

2. Airborne 2.a. AirIodines 2,b. AirParticulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment

4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broad Leaf Vegetation Quarterly Weekly Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 27 0

Number of Snmpha 25 65 65 13 Total: 180 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limitof Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit(with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

1 of 13

SL QR97-4 DIRE TRADI D-Rh r

Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 Deployment 11-Sep-97 Collection 05-Dec-97 4.79 a 0.37 4.63 w 0.36 5,22+ 0.40 4.98+ 0.38 6.32 w 0.48 Sample Site SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 Deployment 11-Sep-97 Collection 05-Dec-97 4.55+ 0.35 5.83 ~ OA4 5.04 ~ 0.39 4.73 w 0.36 5.09 a 0.39 5.16 ~ 0.40 WI'AV-2 Wt'Ail-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 5.00 a 0.38 5.06+ 0.39 5.18 ~ 0.40 Mjssjno (A) 5.42 w 0.41 5.09 a 0.39 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 4.76 w 0.37 5.13 ~ 0.39 4.51 w 0.35 Missing (A) 4.62+ 0.36 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 4.82 w 0.37 5.00 R 0.38 4.50 ~ 0.35 4.55 ~ 0.35 5.83 ~ OA4 5.04 ~ 0.39 SE-1 H-32 4.43 ~ 0.35 5.51 + 0.42 (A) The tld's for sites W-2 and SSE-5 were missing when collection was attempted.

New tld's were deployed near original locations.

2of 13

SL QR97-4 Collection Date 08-Oct-97 16-Oct-97 20-Oct-97 27-Oct-97 H08

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 H12

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 Sample Site H14

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 H30

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 H34

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 03-Nov-97 12-Nov-97 17-Nov-97 24-Nov-97

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 Ol-Dec-97 08-Dec-97 15-Dec-97 22-Dec-97 29-Dec-97

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 3 of13

SL QR97-4 2

1 AIRPA A E Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 08-Oct-97 0,026 ~ 0,002 0.024 ~ 0.002 0.020 ~ 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.019+ 0.002 16-Oct-97 0.015 a 0.002 0.021 a 0.002 0.022 a 0.002, 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 20-Oct-97 0.008 a 0.003 0.007 ~ 0.003 0.014+ 0.003

<0.009 0.010 a 0.003 27-Oct-97 0.021 a 0.003 0.019 a 0.002 0.013 a 0.002 0.022 a 0,002 0,015 ~ 0.002 03-Nov-97 0.014 ~ 0,002 0.017 a 0.002 0,010 a 0.002 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.014 a 0.002 12-Nov-97 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.021 ~ 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 0.018 a 0.002 0.019 a 0.002 17-Nov-97 0.017 ~ 0.003 0.018+ 0.003 0.018 a 0.003 0.020 ~ 0.003 0.024 ~ 0.003 24-Nov-97 0.019 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 0.017 a 0.002 01-Dec-97 0.016+ 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.016 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 08-Dec-97 0.016 ~ 0.002 0.020 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.021+ 0.002 15-Dec-97 0.012 ~ 0.002 0.012 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 22-Dec-97 0.020 a 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 29-Dec-97 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.018 s 0.002 0.006 ~ 0.002 0.015 s 0.002 0.016 a 0.002 0.010+ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 Mean:

0.016 ~ 0.001 0.017 ~ 0.001 0.016 ~ 0.001

<0.015 0.016 w 0.001 2..2. AIRPARTI LATE A MAANALY I F

ARTERLY MP E

i m~

~m1~ia H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.1132 w 0.0105 0.1295 2 0.0103

<0.0142

<0.0186 K-4 0.1543 w 0.0105

<0.0195 0.1592 w 0.0103

<0.0199 0.1379 w 0.0100

<0.0175 M4

<0.0010

<0.0010

<0.0009

<0.0010

<0.0008 M3Z

<0.0010 Eh=2&I 0.0077 w 0.0027

<0.0009 0.0216 w 0.0034

<0.0007 0.0177 w 0.0031

<0.0007 0.0151 2 0.0027

<0.0006 0.0186 w 0.0027 4of 13

SLQ

-4 W

Sample Collection

~h hfdf CQE H15 08-Oct-97

<145 298 + 34

<3

<3

<7

<4

<S Zr-95 L131 (A)

<7

<S

<4

<4 QM CalXl Ba-140 La=HQ (B)

<5 15-Oct-97

<145 326 + 12

<1

<1

<2 20-Oct-97

<144 313 + 33

<3

<3

<7 27-Oct-97

<144 325 + 33

<3

<3

<6 03-Nov-97

<152 331 + 34

<3

<4

<7 12-Nov-97

<151 311 + 32

<4

<3

<7 17-Nov-97

<151 394 + 32

<3

<3

<6 24-Nov-97

<151 312 + 35

<3

<5

<S 01-Dec-97

<145 340 + 36

<4

<3

<8 08-Dec-97

<145 351 + 14

<1

<1

<3 15-Dec-97

<145 307 + 31

<4

<4

.<S 22-Dec-97

<145 309 + 34

<3

<3

<7 29-Dec-97

<135 352 + 31

<3

<3

<6 H59 15-Oct-97

<145 337+ 34

<4

<4

<7 04-Nov-97

<152 274 + 31

<4

<3

<9 05-Dec-97

<145 303 + 34

<4

<5

<9

<1

<3

<2

<1

<4

<7

<7

<5

<4

<7

<6

<4

<5

<7

<7

<4

<4

<8

. <6

<4

<4

<10

<6

<8

<4

<9

<6

<5

<5

<8

<7

<6

<4

<7

<6

<4

<3

<6

<5

<3

<4

<9

<7

<6

<4

<8

<6

<5

<4

<10

<6

<5

<4

<4

<4

<4

<5

<4

<3

<4

<5

<4

<4

<5

<5

<4

<3

<4

<8

<9

<6

<6

<5

<4

<8

<8

<5

<5 (A) - These tabulated LLDvalues for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher ofthe individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

5 of 13

SLQ

-4 Sample Collection 1'-'2 IL4Q ME C~

Q-L8 Q-132 EHJ2 EQZ6 Xh232 LL23E These samples were previously collected.

e wei Sample Collection

~)~ie hire.k ME ~

6=69 ~

Q-12 Q-1Z

~@2'a-222 These samples were previously collected.

w we h

Sample Collection

~i~e

~4 he% ME M Mdl ~

Q=E4 Q=IZ ~26 34228 These samples were previously collected.

6 of 13

SLQ

-4 V

wtwi Sample Site H51 Collection Date 15-Oct-97 04-Nov-97 05-Dec-97 Be-7 609 &44 KAO I-131 2902+ 106

<9 788 + 66 2144 + 118

<9 609 + 48 3344 + 123

<11 Cs-134

<8

<9 Cs-137

<10

<8 Pb-210

<436

<1259

<570 Ra-226

<167

<230

<168 Other H52 15-Oct-97 561 + 49 2713 + 109

<10 04-Nov-97 968 + 64 2153 + 115

<9 05-Dec-97 1092 + 64 1602 + 84

<10

<8

<9

<6

<8

<521

<694

<532

<174

<229

<183 H59 15-Oct-97 861 + 64 4281 + 163

<11 04-Nov-97 390 + 50 1082 + 87

<10 05-Dec-97 432 + 55 2824 + 111

<10

<12

<10

<10

<8

<670

<540

<496

<238

<207

<180 7 of 13

1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1997

i~

FLORIDA DEPT'F HEALTH EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1997 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-133 Sr-89 Sr-90

'lpha Beta I-131 H-3 Media Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr 06 06 97 06 06 97 06 06 97 06 06 97 06 06, 97 01 17 97 01 17 97

'1 31 97 01 31 97 02 07 97 03 07 97 EPA Known 18 100 22 49 25 12 25 5.2

14. 7 86 7900 Units pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Normal.

Range 0.118 0.236 0.236 0.118 0.354 0.000 0.473 0.177 0.319 0.131 0.043 Mean of Analyses 18.67 104.33 21.33 52.67 23.67 5.00 21.33 6.47 17.90 83.67 7332.33 N.D.K. Action Level 0.23 0.75

-0.23 1.27

-0.46

-2.42

-1.27 0.44 1.11

-0.45

-1.24 NOTES:

Normal.:

Normalized range.

As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.

S. Environmental Protection

Agency, P.- 0.

Box 93478, Las Vegas,

Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004,

February, 1981.

N.D.K.:

NDP:

NA:

Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

No data provided.

No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

Not available.

Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

FLORIDA DEPT OF HEALTH EPA ZNTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1997 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Alpha Beta Beta Co-60 Zn-65 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-137 H-3 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Media Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr 07 18 97 10 31

'97 07 18 97 10 31 97 11 07 97 ll 07 97 11 07 97 ll 07 97 11 07 97 08 08 97 09 19 97 07 11 97 07 11 97 EPA Known 3.1

14. 7 15.1 48.9 27 75 99 10 74 11010 10 44 16 Units pC3./L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pc3./L pCi/L pCi/L Normal.

Range 0.142 0.177 0.071 0.354 0.118 0.222 0.177 0.000 0.118 0.519 0.295

. 0.354 0.236 Mean of Analyses 4.70 7.37 17.17 53..40 28.33 80.33 92.33 10.00 77.67 10485.00 11.33 36.00 13.00 N.D.K. Action Level 0.55

-2.54 0.72 1.56 0.46 1.15

-1.15 0.00 1.27

-0.83 0.38 2

~ 7 7

-1. 04 NOTES:

Normal.:

N.D.K.:

NDP:

NA:

Normalized range.

As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Xntercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.

S. Environmental Protection

Agency, P. 0.

Box 93478, Las Vegas,

Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004,

February, 1981.

Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

No data provided.

No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

Not available.

Report containing this data has not yet.

been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

IB e

DLlH kNV RHDIHlJUN C IRL I-ax:4UC-Z9/-ZU8>

i-eb '-'87'jj'~l'. 1P'18 QAP 46 R ults by Laboratory Lab: FL Florida Dept of Health & Rehab. S rv., Orlando EML591 QAP 9703 July 1,1997 Pl ere.h.

No.

Test Radio-Reported Reported nuclide Value Error E

L Va ue EMl.

Error QAP 45 ML Evaluation Evaluation Matrix:

Matrix:

Al AM241 CE144 CO 57

'O60 CS134 CS137 GA 1 GB 2 MN 54 PU238 PU239 SB125 U 238 Bqifitter 1.000

, 18.200 12.660 5.950 11.160, 10.500 0.960 0.590 9.800 0.065 0.083 12.800 0.800 Bq/kg 0.050 0.200 0.060 0.090 0.090 0.100 0.020 0.010 0.100 0.004 o,oo4 0.500 0.200 0 "I 15 10.

5.

10, e.y 52 00 10 10 80 00 960 0.$50 7.(20 0.100 0.119 12.330 0.105

.0.013 1.000 1.000 0,300 1.000 0.800 0.050 0.030 0.600 0.006 0.006 1,000 0,004 6.579 1,159 1.171 1.188 1.026 1.207 1.000 1.311 1.286 0.649 0.699 1.038 7.656 N

W W

A W

A A

W W

W A

N N

W W

WI A

N A

AM241 CS137 K 40 PU238 PU239 U 238 Matrix:

VE 5.000 841.000 34'l.ooo 0.238 147.374 34.700 Bqlkg 0.500 2.000 6.000 0.240, 4.190 3.700 5.080 825,500

'34.050 0.$30 134.930 42.$ 30 0.500 14.100 7.140 0.111 17.100 2.500 0.880 1,019 1.020 0.449 1.092 0.818 A

A A

W AA A

A A

W A

AM241 2.300 CO 60 14.500 CS137 219.000 K 40 953.000 0.500 0.600 1.000 13.000 I

.1 ~ 1 3

12.5 0 189.2, 0 811.500 0.113 0.320 7.270 12.200 1,944 1.160 1.157 1.'l74 W

A A

A A

A W

A Matrix:

WA Bq/L 1

I 1'

1 1

1 1

CO 60 CS134 CS137 GA 1

GB 2 H

3 MN 54 PU238 PU239 97.600 22.500 79.400 1332.000 643.000 228.000 24.300 1.310 0.815 0.800 0.400 0.800 19.000 9.000 2.000 0.300 0.021 0.014 90,850 20.550 69.780 1130.060 744.000 250.300 20.850 o.'e)o 1,150 0.310 1.230

. 10.000 10.000 4.200 0.310 0.063 0.050 1.074 1.095 1.138 1.170 0.860 0.911 1.165 1.015 0.959 A

W A

A W

A W

A A

A A

W W

A W

A

~

W Values for elemental uranium are reported in p ilter, 9, or IL.

pCl/g or rnL ~ Bq x 0.021

L 4,

DUH ENV RH13LHILUN IRL l.ax:4Ur'-Z9r'-AN>

i.eO

--'87'97 28S5Y. 18/18 Umts by Laboratory

. Orlando GAP 47 Re Lab'. FL Florida De t of Health 8 Rehab. SeN EML694 QAP 9709 January 1,199f3 5~p+

l f +

No.

Test I

Radio.

Reported Reported

- EwfLf nuclide Value Error Vafu'e EML QAP 46 Error ML Evaluation Evaluation Matrix:

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

'f 1

1 1

Al AirFilter Bqlfilter r

AM24'f 0.440 '.050 CE'l44 15.700 0.300 CO 57, 10.330" 0.050 CO 60 9.1TO 0.120 CS134.

~

21,900 0.170 CS137 6.900 0,100 GA

'le470 0.040 GB 3.280 0,050 MN 54 6.300 0.100 PU238 0.210 0.007 PU239 0,110 0.005 SB125 13.900 0.400 0.2110 19.120 12.650 10.7 0 28.170 njo 3.0qo 6.720 0.210 0.100 16.180 0.009 0.700 0.430 1.090 0,730 0.250 0.090 0.140 0.270 0.007 0.'o04 0.790 2.060 0.820 0.810 0.850 0.770 0.940 0.980 1.090 0.930 1.000 1.030 0.860 N

A AA W

A A

A A

A AA N

W W

W A

W A

A W

W W

A Matrix:

SO Soil Bq/kg AM241 5.700 CO 60 1.600 CS137 838.000 K40 306.000 U238 27.7OO 0.600 0.200 2.000 5.000 3.?00 6.040 1.500 810.000 315,000 34.900 0,580 0.400 40.000 20.000 0.140 O,94O 1.060 1.030 0.970 0.790 A

A A

A A

A A

A Matrix:

VE Vegetation Bqlkg AM241 5.300 CO 60 34.900 CS'l37 738.000 K40 1183.000 Matrix:

NA Water BqlL O.TOO 0.500 2.000 10.000 3.460 32.400 624.000

'f130.000 0.250 1.600 31.000 70.000 1.530 1.070 1.180 1.040 A

A A

A W

A A

A 1

1 CO 60 CS134 CS137 GA GB H 3" MN 54 25.700 74.500 39.300 841.620 1060.000 112.000 45.300 0.300 0.500 0.600 12.750 9.400 1,700 0.600 23.304 66.00 34.30 557.00, 712.000 115.00/

37.800 1.200 2.600 1.700 60.000 70.000 6.ooo 1.900 1.'foo 1.120 1.140 1.510 1 480 0.970 1.190 A

A A

N A

W A

A A

W A

A W

~

~

~

Vafues for etetnentaf uranium are reported in fIlg/filter,g, or mL.

Evatnanon, A=Aoeeptabie, W Aooeptabie with Waminti N=Not Aeoeptabia pCilg or mL = 80 a 0027 lfthe evaluation system ls not appropriate forthe types ofanalyses performed ln your lab, apply site specific evaluation.

99

o ~

l "1

4