ML071090180
| ML071090180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/2007 |
| From: | Sands S P NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2 |
| To: | |
| Sands S P,NRR/DORL, 415-3154 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML071090184 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC MD7434, TAC MD7435 | |
| Download: ML071090180 (7) | |
Text
May 2, 2007LICENSEE:Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY:LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF APRIL 5, 2007, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATIONCOMPANY, LLC (TAC NOS. MD7434 AND MD7435)On April 5, 2007, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generating Company, LLC (Exelon) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss regulatory resolution pathways for a proposed submittal, for the ultimate heat sink (UHS) for LaSalle County Station (LaSalle), Units 1 and 2. A list of attendees is provided as Enclosure 1. BACKGROUNDOn March 13, 2006, Exelon submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to the NRC tochange the technical specification (TS) limit of the UHS from 100 F to 101.5 F byreducing the temperature measurement uncertainty by replacing the existing thermocouples with higher precision temperature measurement equipment. On June 15, 2006, the NRC staff forwarded a request for additional information (RAI) to Exelon. Exelon responded to the RAI on July 13, 2006. After a number of telephone conferences, Exelon submitted a supplemental response to the NRC on August 4, 2006. The NRC staff reviewed the material supplied by Exelon with respect to the UHS submittal, and on November 13, 2006, the NRC staff determined that the degree of measurement accuracy that would be required to support the LAR was not adequately demonstrated and denied the LAR. In a letter to the NRC dated January 24, 2007, Exelon stated that the NRC was challenging the current design and licensing basis and that the technical basis for the denial represented a change in NRC's position on theappropriate measurement uncertainty methodology applied to non-safety related, indication only instrumentation.
On January 26, 2007, a public meeting was held between the NRC and representatives of Exelon to discuss the denial of the UHS submittal and Exelon's plan for re-submittal of theproposed LAR. At that meeting a number of actions items were identified for both the NRC staff and Exelon to address before the April 5, 2007, meeting. APRIL 5, 2007, MEETING
SUMMARY
The action items discussed during the January 26, 2007, meeting and their disposition arediscussed below. The NRC action items from the January 26, 2007, meeting are discussed in the body of the Exelon action items and are not covered separately. Exelon's action items:*Assess the acceptability of inserting a table in the LaSalle TS to address the loss ofthree out of four temperature detectors.Exelon determined this approach was not desirable and inconsistent with the integratedTSs and that this issue would be handled in the Bases section and maintained through their bases control program. The NRC staff agreed this was an acceptable approach.
- Correct the discrepancy in the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) thatdescribes the post accident temperature limit of 102 F versus the stated LAR value of 104 F. Exelon stated this would be accomplished in the next UFSAR update.*Verify the level of accuracy of the original thermocouple measurement uncertainty andthe basis for it. Exelon stated that when the plant was initially licensed, the licensing basis for LaSalle,with respect to UHS, was a nominal plant value, and as such no measurement uncertainty calculations were performed in the initial treatment of non-safety instruments such as the UHS thermocouples. This was the basis for Exelon's statement in their January 24, 2007, letter responding to the NRC denial of the UHS LAR that the NRC challenged the current design and licensing basis of the LaSalle circulating water system. NRC Deputy Director, Ken O'Brien informed Exelon that the only aspect of the design basis being reviewed was the design limit of 102 F for the UHS and not anyassociated uncertainty calculations. After the discussion, Exelon stated they no longer considered that the NRC challenged the LaSalle licensing or design basis.*Determine if the NRC had approved a graded approach to setpoint methodology forother licensees.NRC has not approved the graded approach for setpoint methodology at LaSalle. Inaddition, the NRC staff has not approved a license amendment for other licensees, using the graded approach. This was also an issue in the Exelon letter of January 24, 2007. Exelon's position that the technical basis for the denial, as described in the NRC staff's safety evaluation (SE), represented a change in the NRC position on the appropriate measurement uncertainty methodology being applied to non-safety related, indication only instrumentation. The NRC staff informed Exelon that the graded approach was not approved nor accepted, and that if Exelon wished to use this approach, they would have to supply all supporting documentation for the NRC staff's review which would support their calculations and their approach to measurement uncertainty.*Describe the industry standard for a graded approach to setpoint methodologyExelon presented the graded approach to setpoint methodology used by the industry. The NRC staff acknowledged that the industry may use the graded approach for some systems, however, for setpoint methodology, the NRC evaluates the information based on a two sigma (2) uncertainty analysis. The NRC staff discussed the Agency's position on the graded approach to setpoint methodology as well as the position inRegulatory Guide 1.105, "Setpoints for Safety Related Instrumentation."*The NRC staff discussed the value of completing the UHS uncertainty calculations usingthe 95/95 tolerance limit (2) as an acceptable method for uncertainties. This methodensures that there is a 95 percent probability that the constructed limits contain 95 percent of the population of interest for the surveillance interval selected. Exelon proposed that since the area of concern only relates to high temperature (notexceeding the design limit of 102 F), they plan to use single sided uncertainty in theirevaluation using the 95/95 tolerance limit which results in the uncertainty of about 0.49F. This should be within the calculated range for uncertainty for it to be below the 102 F design limit. The NRC staff pointed out that a licensee, with justification, maypropose an alternative calculation other than the 95/95 tolerance limit, based on its particular setpoint methodology or license.*A review of NRC's uncertainty calculation was discussed. The NRC's alternativecalculation identified a possible discrepancy between the calibration data and some assumptions in the Exelon calculation. The alternative calculation also addressed possible discrepancies between the assumed and derived resistance-temperature detector characteristics, but because the discrepancies may be related to differing definitions or other conditions, the alternative calculation did not address them directly.
Exelon indicated they would review the alternative calculations in detail, and plans to resubmit the amendment request by the end of May 2007.Exelon presented information (See Enclosure 2 or the Agencywide Documents Access andManagement System Accession No. ML071090218). Exelon's presentation provided a time line for the UHS as well as a listing of action items resulting from the previous public meeting on January 26, 2007. Members of the public were not in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were notreceived. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3154, or sps1@nrc.gov
. /RA by RKuntz for/Stephen P. Sands, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees2. Licensee Handoutcc w/encls: See next page position on the graded approach to setpoint methodology as well as the position inRegulatory Guide 1.105, "Setpoints for Safety Related Instrumentation."*The NRC staff discussed the value of completing the UHS uncertainty calculations usingthe 95/95 tolerance limit (2) as an acceptable method for uncertainties. This methodensures that there is a 95 percent probability that the constructed limits contain 95 percent of the population of interest for the surveillance interval selected. Exelon proposed that since the area of concern only relates to high temperature (notexceeding the design limit of 102 F), they plan to use single sided uncertainty in theirevaluation using the 95/95 tolerance limit which results in the uncertainty of about 0.49F. This should be within the calculated range for uncertainty for it to be below the 102 F design limit. The NRC staff pointed out that a licensee, with justification, maypropose an alternative calculation other than the 95/95 tolerance limit, based on its particular setpoint methodology or license.*A review of NRC's uncertainty calculation was discussed. The NRC's alternativecalculation identified a possible discrepancy between the calibration data and some assumptions in the Exelon calculation. The alternative calculation also addressed possible discrepancies between the assumed and derived resistance-temperature detector characteristics, but because the discrepancies may be related to differing definitions or other conditions, the alternative calculation did not address them directly.
Exelon indicated they would review the alternative calculations in detail, and plans to resubmit the amendment request by the end of May.Exelon presented information (See Enclosure 2 or the Agencywide Documents Access andManagement System Accession No. ML071090218). Exelon's presentation provided a time line for the UHS as well as a listing of action items resulting from the previous public meeting on January 26, 2007. Members of the public were not in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were notreceived. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-3154, or sps1@nrc.gov
. /RA by RKuntz for/Stephen P. Sands, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees2. Licensee Handout cc w/encls: See next page Distribution
- PUBLICTLiu, NRRTBloomer, EDODRahn, RES LPL3-2 R/FRidsNrrDorlRidsRgn3MailCenterRidsNrrDe RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2PRebstock, RESRidsNrrLAEWhittRidsOgcRp RidsNrrPMSSandsRidsNrrDeEicb RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter Package Accession No. ML071090184Meeting Summary Accession No. ML071090180License Handouts Accession No. ML071090218OFFICELPL3-2/PMLPL3-2/LADE/EICB/BCLPL3-2/BCNAMESSandsEWhittAHoweRGibbsDATE 05/02/07 05/02/07 04/ 25 /07 05/02/07 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Site Vice President - LaSalle County StationExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757Plant Manager - LaSalle County StationExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757Manager Regulatory Assurance - LaSalleExelon Generation Company, LLC 2601 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9757U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionLaSalle Resident Inspectors Office 2605 North 21st Road Marseilles, IL 61341-9756Phillip P. Steptoe, EsquireSidley and Austin One First National Plaza Chicago, IL 60603Assistant Attorney General100 W. Randolph St. Suite 12 Chicago, IL 60601ChairmanLaSalle County Board 707 Etna Road Ottawa, IL 61350Attorney General500 S. Second Street Springfield, IL 62701ChairmanIllinois Commerce Commission 527 E. Capitol Avenue, Leland Building Springfield, IL 62706Robert Cushing, Chief, Public Utilities DivisionIllinois Attorney General's Office 100 W. Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60601Regional Administrator, Region IIIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 210 2443 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4352Illinois Emergency Management Agency Division of Disaster Assistance &
Preparedness 110 East Adams Street Springfield, IL 62701-1109Document Control Desk - LicensingExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Senior Vice President - Operations SupportExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Director - Licensing and Regulatory AffairsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Vice President - Regulatory AffairsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Associate General CounselExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:Manager Licensing - Braidwood, Byron, and LaSalle Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Senior Vice President - Midwest OperationsExelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555Mr. Christopher M. Crane, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 ATTENDANCE LISTMEETING WITH EXELON GENERATING COMPANYPRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO DISCUSS THE ULTIMATEHEAT SINK (UHS) AMENDMENT REQUESTNAMEORGANIZATIONPHONE NUMBER Stephen P. SandsNRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-2301-415-3154Kenneth G. O'BrienNRC/NRR/APES/DE301-415-3300 Russell GibbsNRC/
NRR/DORL/LPL III-2301-415-2988Paul RebstockNRC/RES301-415-3295 Allen HoweNRC/NRR/EICB301-415-1351 John LubinskiNRC/NRR/DORL301-415-1453 Hukam GargNRC/NRR/DE301-415-2929 David RahnNRC/RES/ERA/IEEB301-415-5216 Wes BowersExelon610-765-5456 Vikram ShahExelon/LaSalle/I&C Design 815-415-3828 Terrence SimpkinExelon/LaSalle815-415-2800 Darin M. BenyakExelon/Corp. Licensing630-657-2811 Alison MackellarExelon/Corp. Licensing630-657-2817 Jerry VossExelon Services Corp.301-984-4400