|
|
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
| Submission Type: | | Submission Type: |
| WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
| | Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: |
| NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: | | NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: |
| NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0060 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Arturo Torres Address: 810 Regal RoadEncinitas, CA, 92024 General Comment Our family lives within 25 miles of San Onofre Nuclear Station. We have been fearful of a nuclear accident for many years. When San Onofre shut down, we felt a sense of relief. When the California Coastal Commission decided to allow the highly radioactive waste to be partially buried on the beach as storage, we were shocked and frightened. This fear has continued to grow the more we learn about the way this difficult problem of storage is handled. We were sad that we had to decide to sell our home and move away from the area because the manner and location for radioactive waste storage at San Onofre was susceptible to dangerous consequences. | | NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0060 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Arturo Torres Address: 810 Regal RoadEncinitas, CA, 92024 General Comment Our family lives within 25 miles of San Onofre Nuclear Station. We have been fearful of a nuclear accident for many years. When San Onofre shut down, we felt a sense of relief. When the California Coastal Commission decided to allow the highly radioactive waste to be partially buried on the beach as storage, we were shocked and frightened. This fear has continued to grow the more we learn about the way this difficult problem of storage is handled. We were sad that we had to decide to sell our home and move away from the area because the manner and location for radioactive waste storage at San Onofre was susceptible to dangerous consequences. |
Latest revision as of 22:25, 5 July 2018
|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2018-0017, Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel2018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2772018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (060) from Marion Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2762018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (070) from Daniel Dowden on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2702018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (064) from Mary Jo Poole on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3792018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3782018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (052) from Carmela Price on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3742018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (057) from Arturo Torres on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3732018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (056) from Irwin Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3722018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (055) from Paula Colby on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3712018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (054) from Joel Goldstein on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3622018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (049) from Scott Chamberlin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3572018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (044) from Sheryl Arruda on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18158A2792018-06-0505 June 2018 Comment (062) from Jonathan Adler on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3682018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (042) of Jo Panitch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3672018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (041) of Anne Clorite on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3662018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (040) from Susan and David Dearing on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3652018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (039) of Berton Moldow on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3642018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (038) of Laura Lynch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3562018-06-0404 June 2018 Comment (043) of Mary Steele on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A2992018-06-0101 June 2018 Comment (034) from an Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18157A3002018-05-31031 May 2018 Comment (033) from Patricia Borchmann on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18150A6392018-05-29029 May 2018 Comment (029) from Donna Shanske on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18149A6012018-05-25025 May 2018 Comment (019) from Cord Bauer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18094A7852018-04-0303 April 2018 Comment (003) from Ken Berg on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18094A7732018-04-0202 April 2018 Comment (002) from Ron Rodarte on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML18100A3522018-04-0202 April 2018 Comment (012) of Steve Schlesinger on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML16082A0072016-03-18018 March 2016 Comment (112) of Charles R. Langley on Behalf of Public Watchdogs on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16060A5112016-02-29029 February 2016 Comment (043) of Sara Kaminske on Behalf of Orange County, CA on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16053A4532016-02-0101 February 2016 Comment (036) of Ron Roberts and Dianne Jacob on Behalf of the County of San Diego, CA, Board of Supervisors on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML13360A3582013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00685) of Ray Lutz on Behalf of Citizens Oversight, Inc. on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14007A0332013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00868) of Patricia Holloway on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A4422013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00845) of G. Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A4382013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00841) of Bruce Lieberman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14006A3782013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00835) of Yoko Collin on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0572013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00786) of Alan Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0052013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00736) of Valerie Burchfield Rhodes on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13365A3372013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00717) of Laurenn Barker on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4162013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00632) of Christina Imhoof on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14002A0042013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00801) of Jim Powers on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14002A0002013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00797) of Kevin Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0372013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00766) of Ed Maher on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0362013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00765) of Juniel Worthington on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML14001A0252013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00754) of Margaret Kuchnia on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13357A8322013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00601) of Roger Johnson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13359A0022013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00648) of Grace Van Thillo on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4262013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00639) of Kim Stanick on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A4252013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00647) of Stephanie Jennings on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13358A3512013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00615) of John Dolegowski on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13352A5172013-12-15015 December 2013 Comment (00461) of Kevin Higgins on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13336A5512013-11-18018 November 2013 Comment (00269) of Bill Hannaman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel 2018-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 4:53 PM Received:
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1k2-93jw-rcjd Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
Submission Type:
Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0060 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Arturo Torres Address: 810 Regal RoadEncinitas, CA, 92024 General Comment Our family lives within 25 miles of San Onofre Nuclear Station. We have been fearful of a nuclear accident for many years. When San Onofre shut down, we felt a sense of relief. When the California Coastal Commission decided to allow the highly radioactive waste to be partially buried on the beach as storage, we were shocked and frightened. This fear has continued to grow the more we learn about the way this difficult problem of storage is handled. We were sad that we had to decide to sell our home and move away from the area because the manner and location for radioactive waste storage at San Onofre was susceptible to dangerous consequences.
Then we read the HELMS prop osal. As we progressed thro ugh the document, we felt a growing sense of hope and security. We realized that by employing the HELMS guidelines, we would be able to keep our home and we would be able to continue to live in our neighborhood and con tinue to participate in our community. While storage of highly radioactive waste is always difficult, the steps described in the HELMS proposal provide common sense solutions to hard proble ms. I hope that the NRC will Page 1 of 206/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=0900006483342a9 a&format=xml&showorig=false consider the value of the homes and businesses and land that will be destroyed if we have significant radiation leaks in the current storage situation.
The solutions provided in the HELMS Proposal are elegant in their simplic ity and in their usef ulness to provide a framework upon which to solve the problem of hi gh-level radioactive waste storage for the next 1000 years. Page 2 of 206/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=0900006483342a9 a&format=xml&showorig=false