ML14044A027: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2013 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. a. Verify that the outiine(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. R\fvJ w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with tt\4 I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
T T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t.Jifr N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
"""' tJ\A R\{\d 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component
: failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified
: scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s),
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and RK\J R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fonm ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the fonm A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonm L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonm (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form. H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
J.w. 0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fonm i<V\J u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of c. applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ' 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the W\J appropriate exam sections.
G rNA w:w E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N E c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. 1.. rv\A fN..w R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 111\A A J,\\\ @(\J L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
N\A f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). N\A P)(lJ a. Author Jtat2.
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
.d/1# 7 /) AI/A c. NRC Chief Examiner
(#)
'lbt11A Jb-zh!zolf d. NRC Supervisor
. .,._ .L .....
":'f/L ::"\ .:&#xa2;;p-&#xa5; I / lY " Note: #Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
*Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28 Scenario Outline Station:
Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-1 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:
-5% Power, steadl&#xa3; state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:
2C RFP OOS Event Malt. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 N BOP Establish Primary Containment lnerting Lineup Per DOP NONE 1600-05 2 NONE R ATC Withdraw Rods To Open Turbine Bypass Valves 3 RODH08DO CIT ATC Control Rod Drifts Out (TS) 4 NIA5POT liT BOP APRM Fails Upscale Without Half Scram (TS) 5 X10/X13 c ATC RFP Vent Fan-Trips Due To Overcurrent 6 HPINIT 1/T BOP HPCI System Spurious Initiation (TS) 7 F41 M TEAM LOCA In DW-Manual Scram 8 H32 c TEAM Loss Of RFPs-Use HPCI To Restore Level .. * (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-1 Page 2 of 28 Rev. 00 (08/13)
Scenario Outline Station:
Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-2 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:
100% Power1 steadl&#xa3; state1 and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:
At beginning of shift1 Core Test using control rods Event Mal f. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 AT17 CIT BOP CORE SPRAY TEST per DOS 1400-05 with Min Flow Auto-close Failure (TS) 2 NONE R ATC Lower Power Using Control Rods 3 RODD08ST c ATC CRD-Control Rod Stuck & Requires Higher Pressure to Move 4 NONE T SRO Torus Level PAM Instrument Not Qualified per IMD (TS) 5 Q31 I Q21 c BOP Service Water Pump Degradation 6 RLMRFPA(B)(C)
I ATC FW-Recirc Runback Due to Loss of FW Signal 7 RXMLGOSC I M ALL Manual Scram REQUIRED
-Due to Reactor Core Instabilities A 55 8 RDHLVFPA(B)
I MIC ALL Failure to Scram (SBLC successful)
RDHLDEGA(B)
.. * (N)ormal, (R)eactlvlty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-2 Page 2 of28 Rev. 00 (08113)
Scenario Outline Station:
Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-3 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:
88% Power, state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:
Scheduled load droe at beginning of shift Surveillance DOS 0500-01 Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test due Event Malf. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 NONE R ATC Lower Power with Recirc 2 MGDDBATR c BOP Generator Bus Duct Blower Trip 3 NONE N ATC Perform Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test on RPS Channel B 4 ICTUBLK liT BOP Isolation Condenser Tube Leak (TS) 5 B02 CIT ATC RPS -MG Set Trips I Re-energize from Reserve Power (TS) 6 B02 I ATC Recirc MG Set Vent Fan Failure 7 T50 I T52 M ALL Loss of Stator Cooling I Manual Scram AT5 NVM100BP FLOODING-Loss of RPV Level Indication Due to Loss of lnst 8 NVML29AP M ALL Power and Transmitter Failures NVML29BP NVML 112P .. * (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO IL T-N-3 Page 2 of26 Rev. 00 (08113)}}

Revision as of 19:04, 2 July 2018

2013 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Outline Submittal
ML14044A027
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/2013
From: Walton R K
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11355A021 List:
References
Download: ML14044A027 (5)


Text

2013 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. a. Verify that the outiine(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. R\fvJ w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with tt\4 I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t.Jifr N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

"""' tJ\A R\{\d 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component

failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified

scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s),

and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and RK\J R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fonm ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the fonm A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonm L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonm (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form. H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

J.w. 0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fonm i<V\J u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of c. applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ' 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the W\J appropriate exam sections.

G rNA w:w E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. 1.. rv\A fN..w R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 111\A A J,\\\ @(\J L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

N\A f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). N\A P)(lJ a. Author Jtat2.

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

.d/1# 7 /) AI/A c. NRC Chief Examiner

(#)

'lbt11A Jb-zh!zolf d. NRC Supervisor

. .,._ .L .....

":'f/L ::"\ .:¢;p-¥ I / lY " Note: #Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 26 of 28 Scenario Outline Station:

Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-1 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:

-5% Power, steadl£ state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:

2C RFP OOS Event Malt. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 N BOP Establish Primary Containment lnerting Lineup Per DOP NONE 1600-05 2 NONE R ATC Withdraw Rods To Open Turbine Bypass Valves 3 RODH08DO CIT ATC Control Rod Drifts Out (TS) 4 NIA5POT liT BOP APRM Fails Upscale Without Half Scram (TS) 5 X10/X13 c ATC RFP Vent Fan-Trips Due To Overcurrent 6 HPINIT 1/T BOP HPCI System Spurious Initiation (TS) 7 F41 M TEAM LOCA In DW-Manual Scram 8 H32 c TEAM Loss Of RFPs-Use HPCI To Restore Level .. * (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-1 Page 2 of 28 Rev. 00 (08/13)

Scenario Outline Station:

Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-2 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:

100% Power1 steadl£ state1 and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:

At beginning of shift1 Core Test using control rods Event Mal f. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 AT17 CIT BOP CORE SPRAY TEST per DOS 1400-05 with Min Flow Auto-close Failure (TS) 2 NONE R ATC Lower Power Using Control Rods 3 RODD08ST c ATC CRD-Control Rod Stuck & Requires Higher Pressure to Move 4 NONE T SRO Torus Level PAM Instrument Not Qualified per IMD (TS) 5 Q31 I Q21 c BOP Service Water Pump Degradation 6 RLMRFPA(B)(C)

I ATC FW-Recirc Runback Due to Loss of FW Signal 7 RXMLGOSC I M ALL Manual Scram REQUIRED

-Due to Reactor Core Instabilities A 55 8 RDHLVFPA(B)

I MIC ALL Failure to Scram (SBLC successful)

RDHLDEGA(B)

.. * (N)ormal, (R)eactlvlty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO ILT-N-2 Page 2 of28 Rev. 00 (08113)

Scenario Outline Station:

Dresden Generating Station Scenario No.: ILT-N-3 Class ID: 2013-301 Evaluators Operators I crew position I ATC I BOP I CRS Initial Conditions:

88% Power, state, and eguilibrium xenon Turnover:

Scheduled load droe at beginning of shift Surveillance DOS 0500-01 Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test due Event Malf. Event Event No. No. Type* Description 1 NONE R ATC Lower Power with Recirc 2 MGDDBATR c BOP Generator Bus Duct Blower Trip 3 NONE N ATC Perform Manual Scram Circuit Sensor Test on RPS Channel B 4 ICTUBLK liT BOP Isolation Condenser Tube Leak (TS) 5 B02 CIT ATC RPS -MG Set Trips I Re-energize from Reserve Power (TS) 6 B02 I ATC Recirc MG Set Vent Fan Failure 7 T50 I T52 M ALL Loss of Stator Cooling I Manual Scram AT5 NVM100BP FLOODING-Loss of RPV Level Indication Due to Loss of lnst 8 NVML29AP M ALL Power and Transmitter Failures NVML29BP NVML 112P .. * (N)ormal, (R)eact1v1ty, (l)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)aJor, (T)ech Spec SCENARIO IL T-N-3 Page 2 of26 Rev. 00 (08113)