ML14071A063

Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End

ML14071A063
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A063 (34)

Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-- -107Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 6Status: YO N[D U0Equipment ID No. .SH21L503B Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description SERVICE WATER 8 TRAIN BA1TERY ROOM HVAC LCSLocation:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1,88 Room, Area 72CManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NO2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/123. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YZ NO U- N/AQYC@ NO U[3 NIAOAnchorage verified SAT on 9/11/124. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[ NO UO N/AnAnchorage verified SAT on 9/11/125. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12YO NO UO N/A0YO NO UR' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 194 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 6Status: YZ NEI U0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH21L5038 Equip. Class' 20Equipment Descriplion YICEBYE WA TER, B OWTRN BAIT Y ROOM 1HVAC LOInteraction Efrects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO Ur N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO Ur N/AOYO NO UOOther Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners wereobserved.

All internal connections and routed cables have beendetermined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 9/11/12.Final walkdown performed on 2/6/13 to Inspect cabinet internals.

No adverse seismic conditions noted.Evaluated by: Ryan HarlosTnylor Vnun hh,,.,V(J(jDate:Tal,11jr Younphitmul Page 195 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 6Page 196 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 6Page 197 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 6Page 198 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 6 of 6Page 199 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0fl-letSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH22L0502 Equip. Class'Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANELSheet 1 of 3Status: YS NE UO1-2A,Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 6tManufacturer.

Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO Nn UO N/AOYO NO UO N/AQ4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YJM Nr3 U[D N/ArO5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified on 8/3CY12 per SEWS package dated&24194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/AllYO NO UOI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 200 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSH22L0502 Equip. Class,Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANELSheet 2 of 3Status: YO NEI U01-2AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO UO1 N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur NIAQand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO NIAOYO NO UOOther Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables had adequate flex. All mounting hardware and anchorage IsIntact and appears In good condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Original walkdown performed on /30/12 verifled anchorage and IPEEE resolution.

Walkdown on 9125/13 pedormed to Inspect cabinet internals.

Evaluated by: Brian NelsonNikol ArrantDate: q Z-11Page 201 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-108Sheet 3 of 3IPage 202 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 4Status: Yo N[-] U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description Unit I Servke Water Battery Fuse Box Train ALocation:

Bldg. SWIS$ Floor El. 1.8 Room. Area 74Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchorage was venfied in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

The anchorage in the panel is free from potentially adverse seismicconditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and Is consistent withSEWS package dated 417/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEIYO NOI UI N/AOYO NO U- N/AQY0 NEI Ur N/AIYO NO UO N/A-YO NO U[-3IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 203 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 4Status: YU N[3 Ur'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description Unit I Service Water Batten Fuse Box Train AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO U' N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEI Ur N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NO UO N/AlOYO NO UQOther Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 NOI UQadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the panel was adequately restrained with no looseconnections and no missing bolts.Conments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/29/12.

Final walkdown performed to inspect panel internals andcomplete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: LTern, Alan MguL~x $~I~iA.a a- ý -Date:

\KJ, -z ciPage 204 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 4Page 205 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 4Page 206 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1 -%%oSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSR42B520B Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description SW BATTERY NO. 3 OR 4 DETECTION CABINETSheet i ofg3 Status: YO N[r] Ur-Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area .7_3Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- Noof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/123. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Anchorage venrfied SAT on 9/12/124. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/125. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12YO NO UD N/AlYO ND UD N/AQYO NO UO N/AOYO NO UO N/AsYO NO UD' Enter the equipment class name rrom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 207 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 03 */,,Status: YO NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B520B Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description SW BA7TERY NO.3 OR 4 DETECTION CABAINETInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI U" N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UF N/Anand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO Nr UO N/A[QYO NEI UOOther Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The internals of tMe cabinet were inspected and no missing hardware orfasteners was observed The cables Inside the cabinet had adequateflex. No other adverse seismic conditons were present.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed oniginally on 9/12/12.-CEvaluated by: Ryan HarJosDate:.iIII r I i, rTavlar Vnunphlrund

&lfY1.f6 )ýýo(/'UPage 208 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0IPage 209 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet z of 4Status: Yo NE ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR4280525A Equip.Equipment Description SW Buildin A Train BattelvSol SwLocation:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1L8 Room, Area 74Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

AnchorsuI. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchorage was verffed in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

The anchorage in the panel is free from potentially adverse seismiccondutis.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage in the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and is consistent withSEWS package dated 417194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YCM N3YO NO UE] NIAQYO NC3 U[I NIAQYO NC3 U[3 NIAC3YO NI- UO NIACYO NO UO' Ener the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 210 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 Of 4Status: Y[ NE] UQSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR4260525A Equip.Equipment Description SIN Building A Train Batte,V Sel SwInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NE UQ N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NOI UO N/ADYO NO UrOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the panel was adequately restrained with no looseconnections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/29/12.

Final walkdown performed to inspect panel internals andcomplete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay TJ ZSQelLATerry Alan MYUlen" 44, 4/JADDate: 2-1 -3:;Ili vlýj IUPage 211 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 4Page 212 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 4Page 213 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS SeI-s 15Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 4Status: Yo Nn ul-IEquipment ID No. QSR42BO526B Equip. Class, 16Equipment Description SERVICE-WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NO. 2 (STANDBYJ Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 ....... Room, Area 72DManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorafze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verified on 8/30/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage venfled on 8/30112.YONOYN NO UO N/AOYO NO UO N/AOY0R NO UO N/AQYM3 NO UO N/AOYO NO UO= Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 214 of 217*Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 214 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 4Status: YO NO UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42B0526B Equip. Class' 16Equipment Description SERVICE WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NQO 2 (STANDBY)

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO UF N/Arl8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOl U[3 N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All Internal cables have adequate flex and do not represent an adverseseismic condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO N/AI-U[3Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables have adequate flex and all mounting hardware is intact andappears to be in good condition.

All sensitive equipment Inside thecabinet (I.e. circuit boards) are mounted adequately and pose noseismic concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

External inspection peoformed 8/30/12.Second walkdown perfonned to Inspect Intemals found no adverse seismic conditions.

IPEEE outliers, restrain cart and ladder In area, have been resolved.

No unrestrained items arelocated in this area.Walkdown end SWC originally completed 10/16/13 has been retyped for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian Nelson _ i ? Date:Nikole ArrantuR'k-I&

xsiOn4h yLPage 215 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl-113 (QSR4280526B)

Shieet 3of 4Page 216 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-113 (05R42130526R)

Sheet 4of 4Page 217 of 217 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 8UNIT 1 -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) (Version 2.0)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 A total of 2 Area Walk-bys have been completed.

The Checklists are provided within this Attachment.

Page 1 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 4Status: Y[D ND UDArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105" Room, Area' CTMT 105' Inside Bloshleld Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NO UO N/Al:2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NE UO N/AOdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?

All overhead equioment appeared to be mounted adequately and Ingood condition.

YO NO Ur N/ADYO NOI UD N/AD' Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 2 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 4Status: YO NEI UQ]A r i- y h i WArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area, CTMT 105' Iside Bloshleld

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

Temporary cables were In the vicinity of the valve, but do not pose anadverse seismic condition.

All scaffold and other material staged foroutage activities was propedy stored and Wll1 be removed near the endof the outage.YO NO UO N/ADYZ NO UO N/AOYO NOI UO N/An8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Date: 9/10/13Nikole Arrant 9/30/13Page 3 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-008 (AWC) CTMT 105' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 4Page 4 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-OO8 (AWC) CTMT 105' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 4Page 5 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet I of.5Status: YN NEI uOLocation:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 129' nearpenetrations Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YO NO UD N/AD2, Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NO UD N/ADdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and other overhead equipment are adequately supported and appear In good condition.

This valve Is also located directly belowgrating which would protect It from Interaction with the overheadequipment.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?

YO ND U- N/AOYO NO UD N/Al'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 6 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5~Status:

Y~Ni] uQ~Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 1291'near oenetratlons

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

This area is not being used for material storage.

Workers In the areawere practicing good houskeeping.

No scaffold or temporary installations were present.YO NOI UO NIADYO NO UD NIAOYO NO UQ N/AQ8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NOl Uiadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Waikdown and A WC completed onginally on 9/30/13 has been retyped for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian Nel&on Date: _ $/1 _ _Nikole A rrant C{kok~ds..'

~1Page 7 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) CTMIT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) CTMT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of SPage 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) C"MT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 10 of 10