ML17254A862: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:AttachmentA1.RevisetheTechnicalSpecificationsbyremovingexistingpages2.1-3and2.1-4andinsertingtheenclosedpage2.1-3.84070500PP44188407i7POP>DOCKpDpPI lit'tt!tlttltt-'t'r Sinceitispossibletohavesomewhatgreaterenthalpyrisehotchannelfactorsatpartpowerthanatfullpowerduetothedeepercontrolbankinsertionwhichispermittedatpartpower,aconservativeallowancehasbeenmadeinobtainingthecurvesinFigure2.1-1foranincreaseinFIHwithdecreasingpowerlevels.Rodwithdrawalblockandloadrunbackoccursbeforereactortripsetpointsarereached.TheReactorControlandProtectiveSystemisdesignedtopreventanyanticipatedcombinationoftransientconditionsforreactorcoolantsystemtemperature,pressureandthermalpowerlevelthatwouldresultintherebeinglessthana95%probabilityata95%confidencelevelthatDNBwouldnotoccur.(2)(1)FSAR,Section3.2.2(2)SafetyEvaluationforR.E.GinnaTransitionto14x14OptimizedFuelAssemblies,WestinghouseElectricCorporation,November1983.2.1-3ftleJ'mendmentNo.March30,1976PROPOSED C~4AttachmentBInpreparationoftheproposedTechnicalSpecificationrelatedtotheuseofWestinghouseOptimizedFuelasareloadfuelforGinna,whichwassubmittedonDecember20,1983,itwasintendedthattheinformationpresentedinTechnicalSpecificationpage2.1-3bedeleted.Thisinformation,theidentificationofnuclearhotchannelfactorswhichformedthebasisfortheprevioussafetylimitcurves,wasnolongercorrectandthecorrectbasiswasidentifiedontheproposedpagechanges.Weunderstandthatbecausethisportionofthechangewasnotexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinitsissuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.,I'IIhJh444hlI'4lL C~1f.IbAIII1t AttachmentCInaccordancewith10CFR50.91,thischangetotheTechnicalSpecificationshasbeenevaluatedagainstthreecriteriatodetermineiftheoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwould:1.involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Asoutlinedbelow,RochesterGasandElectricsubmitsthattheissuesassociatedwiththisamendmentrequestareoutsidethecriteriaof10CFR50.91,andtherefore,anosignificanthazardsfindingiswarranted.Thechangesarealladministrativeinnature.AmendmentNo.61approveduseofWestinghouse'ptimizedfuelbasedonthe,analysisandproposedTechnical'pecificationswhichweresub-"mitted.Weunderstandthat'ecausethisportion:ofthe'hangewas'otexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinits'issuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.TheproposedchangesareconformedtotheCommission'sexample(i)ofchangesthatdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration. | {{#Wiki_filter:AttachmentA1.RevisetheTechnicalSpecificationsbyremovingexistingpages2.1-3and2.1-4andinsertingtheenclosedpage2.1-3.84070500PP44188407i7POP>DOCKpDpPI lit'tt!tlttltt-'t'r Sinceitispossibletohavesomewhatgreaterenthalpyrisehotchannelfactorsatpartpowerthanatfullpowerduetothedeepercontrolbankinsertionwhichispermittedatpartpower,aconservativeallowancehasbeenmadeinobtainingthecurvesinFigure2.1-1foranincreaseinFIHwithdecreasingpowerlevels.Rodwithdrawalblockandloadrunbackoccursbeforereactortripsetpointsarereached.TheReactorControlandProtectiveSystemisdesignedtopreventanyanticipatedcombinationoftransientconditionsforreactorcoolantsystemtemperature,pressureandthermalpowerlevelthatwouldresultintherebeinglessthana95%probabilityata95%confidencelevelthatDNBwouldnotoccur.(2)(1)FSAR,Section3.2.2(2)SafetyEvaluationforR.E.GinnaTransitionto14x14OptimizedFuelAssemblies,WestinghouseElectricCorporation,November1983.2.1-3ftleJ'mendmentNo.March30,1976PROPOSED C~4AttachmentBInpreparationoftheproposedTechnicalSpecificationrelatedtotheuseofWestinghouseOptimizedFuelasareloadfuelforGinna,whichwassubmittedonDecember20,1983,itwasintendedthattheinformationpresentedinTechnicalSpecificationpage2.1-3bedeleted.Thisinformation,theidentificationofnuclearhotchannelfactorswhichformedthebasisfortheprevioussafetylimitcurves,wasnolongercorrectandthecorrectbasiswasidentifiedontheproposedpagechanges.Weunderstandthatbecausethisportionofthechangewasnotexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinitsissuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.,I'IIhJh444hlI'4lL C~1f.IbAIII1t AttachmentCInaccordancewith10CFR50.91,thischangetotheTechnicalSpecificationshasbeenevaluatedagainstthreecriteriatodetermineiftheoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwould:1.involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Asoutlinedbelow,RochesterGasandElectricsubmitsthattheissuesassociatedwiththisamendmentrequestareoutsidethecriteriaof10CFR50.91,andtherefore,anosignificanthazardsfindingiswarranted.Thechangesarealladministrativeinnature.AmendmentNo.61approveduseofWestinghouse'ptimizedfuelbasedonthe,analysisandproposedTechnical'pecificationswhichweresub-"mitted.Weunderstandthat'ecausethisportion:ofthe'hangewas'otexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinits'issuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.TheproposedchangesareconformedtotheCommission'sexample(i)ofchangesthatdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration. | ||
4~S4Tt~khttftILltPJk | 4~S4Tt~khttftILltPJk}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 14:34, 18 May 2018
| ML17254A862 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1984 |
| From: | ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17254A856 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8407240218 | |
| Download: ML17254A862 (7) | |
Text
AttachmentA1.RevisetheTechnicalSpecificationsbyremovingexistingpages2.1-3and2.1-4andinsertingtheenclosedpage2.1-3.84070500PP44188407i7POP>DOCKpDpPI lit'tt!tlttltt-'t'r Sinceitispossibletohavesomewhatgreaterenthalpyrisehotchannelfactorsatpartpowerthanatfullpowerduetothedeepercontrolbankinsertionwhichispermittedatpartpower,aconservativeallowancehasbeenmadeinobtainingthecurvesinFigure2.1-1foranincreaseinFIHwithdecreasingpowerlevels.Rodwithdrawalblockandloadrunbackoccursbeforereactortripsetpointsarereached.TheReactorControlandProtectiveSystemisdesignedtopreventanyanticipatedcombinationoftransientconditionsforreactorcoolantsystemtemperature,pressureandthermalpowerlevelthatwouldresultintherebeinglessthana95%probabilityata95%confidencelevelthatDNBwouldnotoccur.(2)(1)FSAR,Section3.2.2(2)SafetyEvaluationforR.E.GinnaTransitionto14x14OptimizedFuelAssemblies,WestinghouseElectricCorporation,November1983.2.1-3ftleJ'mendmentNo.March30,1976PROPOSED C~4AttachmentBInpreparationoftheproposedTechnicalSpecificationrelatedtotheuseofWestinghouseOptimizedFuelasareloadfuelforGinna,whichwassubmittedonDecember20,1983,itwasintendedthattheinformationpresentedinTechnicalSpecificationpage2.1-3bedeleted.Thisinformation,theidentificationofnuclearhotchannelfactorswhichformedthebasisfortheprevioussafetylimitcurves,wasnolongercorrectandthecorrectbasiswasidentifiedontheproposedpagechanges.Weunderstandthatbecausethisportionofthechangewasnotexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinitsissuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.,I'IIhJh444hlI'4lL C~1f.IbAIII1t AttachmentCInaccordancewith10CFR50.91,thischangetotheTechnicalSpecificationshasbeenevaluatedagainstthreecriteriatodetermineiftheoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwould:1.involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Asoutlinedbelow,RochesterGasandElectricsubmitsthattheissuesassociatedwiththisamendmentrequestareoutsidethecriteriaof10CFR50.91,andtherefore,anosignificanthazardsfindingiswarranted.Thechangesarealladministrativeinnature.AmendmentNo.61approveduseofWestinghouse'ptimizedfuelbasedonthe,analysisandproposedTechnical'pecificationswhichweresub-"mitted.Weunderstandthat'ecausethisportion:ofthe'hangewas'otexplicitlyidentifiedinoursubmittal,theNRCdidnotapprovethischangeinits'issuanceofAmendmentNo.61datedMay1,1984.Theproposedchangeremediesthisinconsistencybydeletingtheincorrectinformation.Inaddition,foradditionalclarifi-cation,arevisedreferencetotheoptimizedfuelanalysis,isprovided.Theproposedchangemerelycorrectsanadministrativeinconsistencyinthebasis.Itdoesnotreviseanyexistinglimitsbutisbasedonpreviouslyapprovedanalyses.TheproposedchangesareconformedtotheCommission'sexample(i)ofchangesthatdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration.
4~S4Tt~khttftILltPJk