IR 05000361/1998002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20216F950
| number = ML20247D314
| issue date = 03/11/1998
| issue date = 03/11/1998
| title = Forwards Insp Repts 50-361/98-02 & 50-362/98-02 on 980209-13.NRC Determined That Licensee Physical Security Program Adequately Implemented.Insp Repts Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 & 10CFR73.21
| title = Insp Repts 50-361/98-02 & 50-362/98-02 on 980209-13.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program,Including Review of Alarm Stations,Access Control,Vital Area Barriers & Emergency Power Supply
| author name = Murray B
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name = Ray H
| addressee name =  
| addressee affiliation = SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
| addressee affiliation =  
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-361-98-02, 50-361-98-2, 50-362-98-02, 50-362-98-2, NUDOCS 9803190150
| document report number = 50-361-98-02, 50-361-98-2, 50-362-98-02, 50-362-98-2, NUDOCS 9805150003
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| package number = ML20247D313
| page count = 1
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
}}


Line 18: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'
{{#Wiki_filter:_
  /
_-_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _    _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _-
ENCLOSURE
!
!:        U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
==REGION IV==
Docket Nos.:    50-361; 50-362 License Nos.:    NPF-10; NPF-15 Report No.:    50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02
-
Licensee:    ' Southern California Edison Co.
 
!  Facility:    San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 i
Location:    5000 S. Pacific Coast Hw '
,
San Clemente, Califomia Dates:    February 9-13, 1998 Inspector (s):    A. Bruce Eamest, Physical Security Specialist Plant Support Branch
,  Approved By: '
Bleine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch
!
Division of Reactor Safety Attachment:    Supplemental Information l-I
!
!
!-
i
            !
I            I l
,
f
        ~
l 9905150003 980311 PDR  ADOCK 05000361 G    pm
_
--__-___m__. _  .-
 
i l        \
  -
e        )
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3  l NRC Inspection Report 50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The  ,
areas inspected included review of alarm stations, communications, personnei and vehicle  j access control, vital area barriers, vital area detection aids, emergency power supply,  '
records and reports, and the security organization. Overall, a continued slight downward program performance trend was noted. Good performance was observed in certain  l program area !
Plant Support I
-
The alarm stations were well protected, and the operators in the central alarm station  .
!
'
were alert and efficient (Section S1.1).    ;
l
-
Communications problems were identified with the responding local law enforcement  I agency (Section S1.2).
 
-
-
P Crieg  UNITED STATES
A noncited violation was identified involving inadequate searches of a vehicle and an employee (Section S1.3).
+  NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 *g
    "'*"'"
! !  "' 8 DOCUMENT CONTAINS
  "2n"d$$1o$YExIsIi.of,'g %,*****/  March 11, 1998 Harold B. Ray, Executive Vice President Southern Califomia Edison Co.


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, Califomia 92674-0128 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02
-
The vital area barriers were adequate. A concern was idantified involving unescorted / uncompensated uso of personnel boom trucks that could allow unauthorized access to vitel areas (Section S2.1).


==Dear Mr. Ray:==
-
From February 9-13,1998, a physical security inspection was conducted at your San Onofre Nuc' ear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 reactor facilities. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection.
The vital area detection aids were adequate to detect an intruder attempting to enter the vital areas (Section S2.2).


The NRC determined that your physical security program was adequately implemented.
-
A significant port %n of the perimeter detection system would not provide a " standby power" indication in the alarm stations if the system suffered a power loss (Section S2.3).


The material enclosed herewith contains Safeguards information as defined by 10 CFR 73.21 and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals is prohibited by Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Therefore, the material will agl be placed in the Public Document Room.
A very good safeguards event reporting system was in place (Section S3.1).


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Fublic Document Room (PDR).
-
 
A good security organization capable of meeting security and contingency plan requirements was in place (Section S6.1).
Should you have any questions conceming this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.


Sincerely,
I l
, o Blaine Murray, Chief  - ~ 'J j V Plant Support Branch  \"
        ,
Division of Reactor Safety j Docket Nos.: 50-361; 50-362 License Nos.: NPF-10; NPF-15 Enclosure:
l
NRC Inspection Report  kIM h*  % 3 W bbi r
_ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - _
50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02 DOCUMENT CdNTAINS    ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S) '
UPON SEPARATION THIS 9803190150 980311    PAGE lS DECONTROLLED PDR ADOCK 05000361 0  PDR ll ll ll10,1lllIll,I lll
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 00:30, 31 January 2022

Insp Repts 50-361/98-02 & 50-362/98-02 on 980209-13.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program,Including Review of Alarm Stations,Access Control,Vital Area Barriers & Emergency Power Supply
ML20247D314
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247D313 List:
References
50-361-98-02, 50-361-98-2, 50-362-98-02, 50-362-98-2, NUDOCS 9805150003
Download: ML20247D314 (2)
v • d • e


Text

_

_-_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _-

ENCLOSURE

!

!: U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket Nos.: 50-361; 50-362 License Nos.: NPF-10; NPF-15 Report No.: 50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02

-

Licensee: ' Southern California Edison Co.

! Facility: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 i

Location: 5000 S. Pacific Coast Hw '

,

San Clemente, Califomia Dates: February 9-13, 1998 Inspector (s): A. Bruce Eamest, Physical Security Specialist Plant Support Branch

, Approved By: '

Bleine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch

!

Division of Reactor Safety Attachment: Supplemental Information l-I

!

!

!-

i

!

I I l

,

f

~

l 9905150003 980311 PDR ADOCK 05000361 G pm

_

--__-___m__. _ .-

i l \

-

e )

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 l NRC Inspection Report 50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The ,

areas inspected included review of alarm stations, communications, personnei and vehicle j access control, vital area barriers, vital area detection aids, emergency power supply, '

records and reports, and the security organization. Overall, a continued slight downward program performance trend was noted. Good performance was observed in certain l program area !

Plant Support I

-

The alarm stations were well protected, and the operators in the central alarm station .

!

'

were alert and efficient (Section S1.1).  ;

l

-

Communications problems were identified with the responding local law enforcement I agency (Section S1.2).

-

A noncited violation was identified involving inadequate searches of a vehicle and an employee (Section S1.3).

-

The vital area barriers were adequate. A concern was idantified involving unescorted / uncompensated uso of personnel boom trucks that could allow unauthorized access to vitel areas (Section S2.1).

-

The vital area detection aids were adequate to detect an intruder attempting to enter the vital areas (Section S2.2).

-

A significant port %n of the perimeter detection system would not provide a " standby power" indication in the alarm stations if the system suffered a power loss (Section S2.3).

A very good safeguards event reporting system was in place (Section S3.1).

-

A good security organization capable of meeting security and contingency plan requirements was in place (Section S6.1).

I l

,

l

_ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000361/1998002&oldid=3422684"