ML20138J310: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-                      ---                  .    - -        - -          .          -        _.      . _ -    .-~~ _-~-
To:                United States of America                                              00CKETED l                                Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                            USNRC i
 
==Subject:==
NRC Staff & Motion for issuance of stay in the matter              '97 APR 23 P4 :41 of Ralph L Tetrick.
Docket No. 55-20726-SP OFFICE OF SECRETARY DOCKETING & SERVICE BRANCH I              On March 27,1997, Peter B. Block, Presiding Officer ruled in favor of myself, Ralph L Tetrick, and ordered that I be issued an SRO License.
i
,              in response the Staff continues to contend that the presiding officer was in error in his decision.
l              The Staff cites the legal standards governing issuance of a Stay.
I respectfully submit the following responses:
1
: 1. Likelihood of Success on the Merits 4      -
The Staff references NUREG-1021, Rev.8 which was not in effect at the time and wants to backfit the NUREG to the Presiding Officers decision, thereby enforcing rules after the fact.
                                                                                                                                ~
: 2. Irreparable injury in the Absence of A Stay The Staff contends that the decision will disrupt the Staff's policy of requiring an 80% passing giade. I contend that the Staffs implementation of NUREG-1021 Rev. 8 clarifies the standards and the Staff's practice will not be disrupted
: 3. Harm to Other Parties
:              The Staff contends that I, Ralph L Tetr!ck will not be substantially harmed by a stay.
The very opposite is true, due to the Staffs continual denial of a license I am unable to apply for a Nuclear Watch Engineers position, this has harmed me monetarily and has limited my career
,              advancement opportunities.
: 4. Where the Public Interest Lies The Staff contends that the Presiding Officers decisionmay introduce confusion as to the grade required for an NRC license.
I contend that Revision
* af NUREG-1021 clarifies any confusion that would arise and that the Staff's abilities to administer tests will not be disrupted.
4                For the reasons stated above, I, Ralph L Tetrick respectfully request that the Commission agree with the
;                Presiding Officer and issue a license.
Sincerely, f
              /Ralph L Tetrick
: g.      (
l, 4
i                                                                    1 1
9705080149 970423 PDR ADOCK 05000250 0                          PDR}}

Latest revision as of 08:29, 22 July 2020

Requests That Commission Agree W/Presiding Officer & Issue SRO License.Staff Continues to Contend That Presiding Officer Was in Error Re Decision.Submits Listed Response to Legal Stds Governing Issuance of Stay Cited by Staff
ML20138J310
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point, 05520726  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/1997
From: Tetrick R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
CON-#297-18267 SP, NUDOCS 9705080149
Download: ML20138J310 (1)


Text

- --- . - - - - . - _. . _ - .-~~ _-~-

To: United States of America 00CKETED l Nuclear Regulatory Commission USNRC i

Subject:

NRC Staff & Motion for issuance of stay in the matter '97 APR 23 P4 :41 of Ralph L Tetrick.

Docket No. 55-20726-SP OFFICE OF SECRETARY DOCKETING & SERVICE BRANCH I On March 27,1997, Peter B. Block, Presiding Officer ruled in favor of myself, Ralph L Tetrick, and ordered that I be issued an SRO License.

i

, in response the Staff continues to contend that the presiding officer was in error in his decision.

l The Staff cites the legal standards governing issuance of a Stay.

I respectfully submit the following responses:

1

1. Likelihood of Success on the Merits 4 -

The Staff references NUREG-1021, Rev.8 which was not in effect at the time and wants to backfit the NUREG to the Presiding Officers decision, thereby enforcing rules after the fact.

~

2. Irreparable injury in the Absence of A Stay The Staff contends that the decision will disrupt the Staff's policy of requiring an 80% passing giade. I contend that the Staffs implementation of NUREG-1021 Rev. 8 clarifies the standards and the Staff's practice will not be disrupted
3. Harm to Other Parties
The Staff contends that I, Ralph L Tetr!ck will not be substantially harmed by a stay.

The very opposite is true, due to the Staffs continual denial of a license I am unable to apply for a Nuclear Watch Engineers position, this has harmed me monetarily and has limited my career

, advancement opportunities.

4. Where the Public Interest Lies The Staff contends that the Presiding Officers decisionmay introduce confusion as to the grade required for an NRC license.

I contend that Revision

  • af NUREG-1021 clarifies any confusion that would arise and that the Staff's abilities to administer tests will not be disrupted.

4 For the reasons stated above, I, Ralph L Tetrick respectfully request that the Commission agree with the

Presiding Officer and issue a license.

Sincerely, f

/Ralph L Tetrick

g. (

l, 4

i 1 1

9705080149 970423 PDR ADOCK 05000250 0 PDR