|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:J The Energy People QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL DOCUMENT NO.: REVISION: | | {{#Wiki_filter:The Energy People DOCUMENT NO.: QAl 10-6 OPS~G QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL REVISION: 0 DATE: 3/10/83 |
| QAl 10-6 0 RIGINATION: | | ~*~IA PAGE 1 OF 1 J RIGINATION: REVIEW: APPROVAL: |
| REVIEW: APPROVAL:
| | STATION VOLUME STATION WORK ORDERS SALEM 2 |
| DATE: PAGE 1 OF 3/10/83 1 STATION STATION WORK ORDERS SALEM 1. SCOPE This instruction applies to the processing of station work orders. 2. PURPOSE .The purpose of this instruction is to describe the maintenance work order review by QA Nuclear Operations personnel. | | : 1. SCOPE This instruction applies to the processing of station work orders. |
| : 3. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS Administrative Procedure No. 9 (AP-9) -Control of Station Maintenance. | | : 2. PURPOSE |
| Master Equipment List (MEL). 4. IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 All non-safety related work orders will be reviewed as specified in AP-9 by the SQAE or his designee prior to the Senior Shift Supervisor's permission signature. | | .The purpose of this instruction is to describe the maintenance work order review by QA Nuclear Operations personnel. |
| Safety-related work orders that require an Inspection Hold Point shall also be reviewed when notification is made. 4.2 The designated staff log in and review the work order for work description and proper classification utilizing the MEL and System Descriptions. | | : 3. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS Administrative Procedure No. 9 (AP-9) - Control of Station Maintenance. |
| | Master Equipment List (MEL). |
| | : 4. IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 All non-safety related work orders will be reviewed as specified in AP-9 by the SQAE or his designee prior to the Senior Shift Supervisor's permission signature. Safety-related work orders that require an Inspection Hold Point shall also be reviewed when notification is made. |
| | 4.2 The designated staff me~ber s~all log in and review the work order for work description and proper classification utilizing the MEL and System Descriptions. |
| 4.2.1 If the classification as non-safety related cannot be confirmed, the performing department*reviewer will confer with the sponsor engineer for the correct classification. | | 4.2.1 If the classification as non-safety related cannot be confirmed, the performing department*reviewer will confer with the sponsor engineer for the correct classification. |
| 4.3 When the staff member concurs with the classification he/she shall mark the appropriate block on the work order with the Quality Inspection stamp. | | 4.3 When the staff member concurs with the classification he/she shall mark the appropriate block on the work order with the Quality Inspection stamp. ~ * |
| * 4. 4 *After the work order is stamped, it shall be noted in the log book and the work order released for further processing.
| | : 4. 4 *After the work order is stamped, it shall be noted in the log book and the work order released for further processing. |
| 4.4.1 If the work order was reclassified to safety-related, written notification will be sent to the sponsor engineer. | | 4.4.1 If the work order was reclassified to safety-related, written notification will be sent to the sponsor engineer. |
| 4.5 If a work order is reclassified to safety-related, all applicable safety-related provisions apply. 5. ATTACHMENTS None ( 8303160629 830314 . I PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR, VOLUME 2 | | 4.5 If a work order is reclassified to safety-related, all applicable safety-related provisions apply. |
| | : 5. ATTACHMENTS None |
| | ( 8303160629 830314 . |
| | I PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR, |
| * Appendix L QA Nuclear Operation Policy}} | | * Appendix L QA Nuclear Operation Policy}} |
Similar Documents at Salem |
---|
Category:QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
MONTHYEARML18106A3161998-01-31031 January 1998 Rev 16 to Section 17.2 to QA During Operations Phase. ML20141H2061996-09-25025 September 1996 Rev 8 to 17.2 to QA During Operation Phase ML20134C5951995-03-25025 March 1995 Quality Assurance Salem & Hope Creek Generating Stations Mechanical Maintenance Audit 95-142 ML18100A3161990-11-0707 November 1990 Rev 0 to Software Qa. ML18092A7441985-07-22022 July 1985 Rev 4 to QA Program Description,Constituting Chapter 17 of FSAR ML18092A2941984-07-22022 July 1984 Rev 3 to QA Program (Updated FSAR Section 17.2) ML18087A7511983-03-10010 March 1983 Station Work Orders. ML18087A7501982-05-13013 May 1982 Rev 10 to Review of Procurement Documents. 1998-01-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217A9931999-09-30030 September 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data ML18107A5581999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 991014 Ltr ML18107A5571999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 991014 Ltr ML18107A5301999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990913 Ltr ML18107A5311999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990913 ML18107A5031999-08-26026 August 1999 LER 99-006-00:on 990729,determined That SG Blowdown RMs Setpoint Was non-conservative.Caused by Inadequate ACs for Incorporating Original Plant Licensing Data Into Plant Procedures.Blowdown Will Be Restricted.With 990826 Ltr ML18107A5201999-08-12012 August 1999 Rev 0 to Sgs Unit 2 ISI RFO Exam Results (S2RFO#9) Second Interval,Second Period, First Outage (96RF). ML18107A4811999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990813 Ltr ML18107A4821999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990813 Ltr ML18107A4691999-07-28028 July 1999 LER 99-008-00:on 990714,determined That Limit Switch Cables Were Subject to Multiple Hot Shorts in Same Fire Area.Caused by Inadequate Original Post Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis.All Limit Switch Cables for MOVs Were Reviewed.With 990728 Ltr ML18107A4441999-07-0606 July 1999 LER 99-007-00:on 990605,surveillance for Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio (QPTR) Was Missed.Caused by Human Error.Qptr Calculation Was Performed & Personnel Involved Have Been Held Accountable IAW Pse&G Policies.With 990706 Ltr ML18107A4211999-07-0202 July 1999 LER 99-005-00:on 990605,11 Containment Declared Inoperable. Caused by Valves 11SW72 & 11SW223 Both Leaking.Procedure S1.OP-ST.SW-0010(Q) Was Enhanced to Provide Specific Instructions to Ensure Proper Sequencing.With 990702 Ltr ML18107A4331999-07-0101 July 1999 LER 99-002-01:on 990405,determined That 2SA118 Failed as Found Leakrate Test.Caused by Foreign Matl Found in 2SA118 valve.2SA118 Valve Was Cycled Several Times & Seat Area Was Air Blown in Order to Displace Foreign Matl.With 990701 Ltr ML18107A4321999-07-0101 July 1999 LER 99-006-01:on 990501,determined That There Was No Flow in One of Four Injection Legs.Caused by Sticking of Valve in Safety Injection Discharge Line to 21 Cold Leg.Valve Was Cut Out of Sys & Replaced.With 990701 Ltr ML18107A5211999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 0 to Sgs Unit 2 ISI RFO Exam Results (S2RFO#10) Second Interval,Second Period,Second Outage (99RF). ML18107A4351999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990713 Ltr ML18107A4341999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990713 Ltr ML20196H8621999-06-30030 June 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data, June 1999 Rept ML18107A3951999-06-17017 June 1999 LER 99-004-00:on 990520,reactor Tripped from 100% Power,Due to Negative Flux Trip Signal from Nuclear Instrumentation. Cause Has Not Been Determined.Discoloration Was Identified on One of Penetrations.With 990617 Ltr ML18107A3661999-06-0909 June 1999 LER 99-003-00:on 990513,unplanned Entry Into TS 3.0.3 Was Made.Caused by Human error.Re-positioned Creacs Supply Fan Selector Switches & Revised Procedures S1 & S2.OP-ST.SSP-0001(Q).With 990609 Ltr ML18107A3551999-06-0202 June 1999 LER 99-005-00:on 990504,failure to Meet TS Action Statement Requirements for High Oxygen Concentration in Waste Gas Holdup Sys Occurred.Caused by Inability of Operators. Existing Procedures Will Be Evaluated.With 990602 Ltr ML18107A3441999-06-0101 June 1999 Interim Part 21 Rept Re Premature Over Voltage Protection Actuation in Circuit Specific Application in Dc Power Supply.Testing & Evaluation Activities Will Be Completed on 990716 ML18107A3541999-06-0101 June 1999 LER 99-006-00:on 990501,HHSI Flow Balance Discrepancy Was Noted During Surveillance.Caused by Sticking of Check Valve in SI Discharge Line to 21 Cold Leg.Valve 21SJ17,was Cut Out of Sys & Replaced.With 990601 Ltr ML18107A3681999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1.With 990611 Ltr ML18107A3721999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 2.With 990611 Ltr ML18107A2931999-05-12012 May 1999 LER 99-002-00:on 990413,determined That Number 12 Auxiliary Bldg Exhaust Fan Was Rotating Backwards.Caused by mis-wiring of Motor Due to Human Error by Maint technician.Mis-wiring Was Corrected & Fan Was Returned to Svc.With 990512 Ltr ML18107A2781999-05-10010 May 1999 LER 99-004-00:on 990411,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred During Reactor Vessel Head Removal in Support of Refueling Operations.Caused by High Radiation Condition.Containment Atmosphere Was Monitored.With 990505 Ltr ML18107A2791999-05-0404 May 1999 LER 99-003-00:on 990406,all Salem Unit 2 Chillers Rendered Inoperable.Caused by Human Error.Lessons Learned from Event Were Communicated to All Operators by Including Them in Night Orders.With 990504 Ltr ML18107A2741999-05-0303 May 1999 LER 99-002-00:on 990405,determined That Containment Isolation Valve Failed as Found Leakrate Test.Caused by Foreign Matl Blocking Valves from Closing.Check Valve Mechanically Agitated.With 990504 Ltr ML18107A3711999-04-30030 April 1999 Corrected Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1 ML18107A3151999-04-30030 April 1999 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Salem Generating Station Individual Plant Exam for External Events (Seismic Portion), Rev 1 ML18107A2991999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Unit 1.With 990514 Ltr ML18107A2971999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Unit 2.With 990514 Ltr ML18107A2351999-04-23023 April 1999 LER 99-001-00:on 990330,MSSV Failed Lift Set Test.Caused by Setpoint Variance Which Is Result of Aging.Valves Were Adjusted & Retested to Ensure TS Tolerance.With 990423 Ltr ML18107A2881999-04-0707 April 1999 Rev 0 to NFS-0174, COLR for Salem Unit 2 Cycle 11. ML18107A1821999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990414 Ltr ML18107A1831999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990414 Ltr ML18106B1471999-03-29029 March 1999 LER 99-001-00:on 990228,reactor Scram Was Noted as Result of Turbine Trip.Caused by Operator Error.Lesson Plans Revised to Explicitly Demonstrate Manner in Which Valve Functions. with 990329 Ltr ML18106B1021999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Salem Unit 2.With 990315 Ltr ML18106B1011999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Salem Unit 1.With 990315 Ltr ML18106B0931999-02-25025 February 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee,Part Number SS-6-T.Caused by Crack Due to Improper Location of Heated Bar.Only One Part Out of 7396 Pieces in Forging Lot Was Found to Be Cracked.Affected Util,Notified ML18106B0701999-02-16016 February 1999 LER 98-015-00:on 981208,inadvertent Discharge Through RHR Relief Valve During Startup Was Noted.Caused by Operator Performing Too Many Tasks Simultaneously.Appropriate Actions Have Been Taken IAW Policies & Procedures.With 990216 Ltr ML18106B0551999-02-0101 February 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Matl Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee,Part Number SS-6-T.Defect Is Crack in Center of Forging.Analysis of Part Is Continuing & Further Details Will Be Provided IAW Ncr Timetables.Drawing of Part,Encl ML18106B0561999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 2.With 990212 Ltr ML18106B0571999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1.With 990212 Ltr ML20205P1671999-01-31031 January 1999 a POST-PLUME Phase, Federal Participation Exercise ML18106B0441999-01-29029 January 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee Part Number SS-6-T.Caused by Crack in Center of Forging. Continuing Analysis of Part & Will Provide Details in Acoordance with NRC Timetables ML18106B0491999-01-28028 January 1999 LER 98-007-01:on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Caused by Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking.Replaced Affected Tubing.With 990128 Ltr ML18106B0401999-01-18018 January 1999 LER 98-016-00:on 981219,ECCS Leakage Was Outside of Design Value.Caused by Leakage Past Seat of 21RH34 Manual Drain. Valve 21RH34 Was Reseated.With 990118 Ltr ML18106B0251998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Salem Unit 2.With 990115 Ltr 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
The Energy People DOCUMENT NO.: QAl 10-6 OPS~G QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL REVISION: 0 DATE: 3/10/83
~*~IA PAGE 1 OF 1 J RIGINATION: REVIEW: APPROVAL:
STATION VOLUME STATION WORK ORDERS SALEM 2
- 1. SCOPE This instruction applies to the processing of station work orders.
- 2. PURPOSE
.The purpose of this instruction is to describe the maintenance work order review by QA Nuclear Operations personnel.
- 3. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS Administrative Procedure No. 9 (AP-9) - Control of Station Maintenance.
Master Equipment List (MEL).
- 4. IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 All non-safety related work orders will be reviewed as specified in AP-9 by the SQAE or his designee prior to the Senior Shift Supervisor's permission signature. Safety-related work orders that require an Inspection Hold Point shall also be reviewed when notification is made.
4.2 The designated staff me~ber s~all log in and review the work order for work description and proper classification utilizing the MEL and System Descriptions.
4.2.1 If the classification as non-safety related cannot be confirmed, the performing department*reviewer will confer with the sponsor engineer for the correct classification.
4.3 When the staff member concurs with the classification he/she shall mark the appropriate block on the work order with the Quality Inspection stamp. ~ *
- 4. 4 *After the work order is stamped, it shall be noted in the log book and the work order released for further processing.
4.4.1 If the work order was reclassified to safety-related, written notification will be sent to the sponsor engineer.
4.5 If a work order is reclassified to safety-related, all applicable safety-related provisions apply.
- 5. ATTACHMENTS None
( 8303160629 830314 .
I PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR,
- Appendix L QA Nuclear Operation Policy